Communications on Applied Nonlinear Analysis

ISSN: 1074-133X
Vol 30 No. 4 (2023)

Quantum Computing Algorithms for Nonlinear Optimization

Problems

Vinod Kumar Vishwakarma

Assistant Professor, Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, Kalinga University, Naya Raipur, Chhattisgarh,
India.
Mail ID: [email protected]

Article History: Abstract:

Received: 10-08-2023 The increasing complexity of real-world optimization problems highlights the importance of
this research since classical algorithms are unable to provide efficient answers in these cases.
Revised: 15-09-2023
Innovative methods for fast and scalable resolution of nonlinear optimization problems are
Accepted: 04-10-2023 required because these problems are prevalent in many fields. The potential for quantum
computing to speed up optimization processes and overcome classical limitations is great,
owing to its superposition principles and intrinsic parallelism. The integration of quantum
algorithms (I-QA) into real-world applications, however, will not always be smooth sailing.
There are significant challenges associated with preserving quantum coherence, correcting
errors, and working within hardware limits. To enable the simultaneous exploration of
solution spaces through quantum parallelism, this research proposes the Hybrid Quantum
Gradient -Classical Approach (HQG-CA), which makes use of parameterized quantum
circuits to represent probable solutions. Additionally, improves convergence rates through
applying quantum gradient information to direct optimization in the quantum state space.
Optimization of portfolios in finance, adjustment of model parameters in machine learning,
and optimization of routes in logistics are a few examples of the many industries that find use
for HQG-CA. These applications are explored in this abstract, which highlights the
revolutionary potential of HQG-CA to solve optimization problems in the real world. The
effectiveness of HQG-CA is assessed through a thorough simulation experiment.
Performance measures such algorithmic speedup, solution accuracy, and scalability are
discussed, which is based on extensive testing and comparison with classical alternatives.
The present research provides a comprehensive evaluation of HQG-CA's potential for
tackling nonlinear optimization problems.
Keywords: Quantum, Computing, Nonlinear, Optimization, Hybrid, Gradient, Classical.

1. Introduction
When applied to nonlinear optimization problems, quantum computing algorithms face a number of
significant obstacles [1]. Applying the advantages of quantum computers to nonlinear optimization
problems is complex, even though they can sometimes outperform classical computers exponentially
[2]. The difficulty of preserving coherence and controlling quantum entanglement during
computations is introduced by the use of quantum bits, or qubits, in quantum computers [3]. There is
a strong need for quantum parallelism due to the complexity of nonlinear optimization problems,
which frequently necessitates the simultaneous investigation of several solutions [4]. With an
increasing number of qubits and computational complexity, however, preserving quantum coherence
becomes an ever-greater challenge [5]. Concerns about accuracy, error rates, and noise are intrinsic

1
https://internationalpubls.com
Communications on Applied Nonlinear Analysis
ISSN: 1074-133X
Vol 30 No. 4 (2023)

to quantum calculations; furthermore, there is an additional set of challenges associated with

encoding conventional nonlinear optimization problems into a quantum form appropriate for
quantum processing [6]. Working together, quantum physicists and optimization researchers are
essential for developing strong quantum algorithms [7], which necessitates knowledge of both
quantum information science and optimization theory [8]. Quantum computers have the potential to
completely transform optimization, the field is still in its early stages [9]. Researchers are actively
working to solve the complex problems of using quantum advantages in nonlinear optimization [10],
which lies at the crossroads of both quantum computing and optimization theory [11].
Exploring solutions to nonlinear optimization problems [12] tenfold quicker than classical algorithms
is the goal of quantum computing techniques, which take advantage of the unique features of
quantum bits (qubits) [13]. Utilizing quantum superposition and entanglement, the Quantum
Approximate Optimization technique (QAOA) is a well-known technique that investigates several
solutions concurrently [14]. To optimize parameters, another method that combines quantum and
classical approaches is Variational Quantum Eigensolver, or VQE [15]. To optimize, D-Wave
systems employ quantum annealing, which mimics physical processes. Despite these encouraging
methods, there are several obstacles [16]. Because qubits are sensitive to outside noise, it is an
enormous challenge to keep qubit coherence, which is an important component of quantum
algorithms [17]. The inclusion of qubits and resources needed for quantum error correction further
increases the computational complexity. It is extremely difficult to put complicated quantum
algorithms into practice due to limitations of quantum hardware including gate faults and
decoherence. Transforming classical problems into a quantum format, or quantum compilation,
presents new difficulties in terms of resilience and precision. One obstacle to evaluating the
performance of quantum optimization algorithms is the absence of defined benchmarks in the field.
It is necessary for physicists, computer scientists, and domain experts to work together because of
the level of knowledge needed in optimization theory and quantum computing. To fully realize
quantum computing's promise in handling nonlinear optimization problems, people must address
these hurdles. Despite this, quantum computing has tremendous promise for revolutionizing
optimization.
• To overcome the shortcomings of classical algorithms when faced with complicated real-
world situations, this research seeks to utilize quantum computing to speed up the solution of
nonlinear optimization problems.
• The HQG-CA method, which makes use of quantum parallelism, incorporates parameterized
quantum circuits to stand in for possible solutions. By utilizing quantum gradient information
for direct optimization in the quantum state space, it improves convergence rates,
demonstrating its novel application of quantum principles to optimization problems.
• The research delves into the practical uses of HQG-CA across a range of sectors, such as
logistics, machine learning, and finance, highlighting its ability to transform optimization
procedures in the actual world. For nonlinear optimization problems, HQG-CA is evaluated
in detail through extensive simulation tests that take algorithmic speedup, solution accuracy,
and scalability into account.

2
https://internationalpubls.com
Communications on Applied Nonlinear Analysis
ISSN: 1074-133X
Vol 30 No. 4 (2023)

Here are the remaining sections of the document: The second section delves into the current state of
affairs and identifies areas that require more research in the field of quantum computing algorithms
for nonlinear optimization problems. An enhanced and revised version of the Hybrid Quantum
Gradient -Classical Approach (HQG-CA) is proposed as an alternative in Section III. The results,
analysis, and comparisons to prior methodologies are presented in Section IV. A summary and final
analysis are provided in Section V.
2. Literature Survey
Many studies have investigated the possibility of using quantum computing to solve difficult
optimization issues, especially in the field of energy systems.
Quantum computing for energy systems optimization (QC-ESO) [18] is investigated by Ajagekar, A.
et al., who compare and contrast classical and quantum methods and discuss the difficulties
encountered. It addresses energy optimization issues, gives an example utilizing open-source
software tools, and talks about two commercially accessible quantum systems. The paper
acknowledges the present limitations of quantum computers while highlighting their potential to
improve energy system optimization.
To address large-scale mixed-integer programming issues, Ajagekar et al. present hybrid models that
combine deterministic algorithms with quantum computing (QC) [19] techniques. Overcoming the
limitations of classical algorithms on classical computers, the suggested QC-A) based algorithms
tackle problems related to molecule conformation, job-shop scheduling, manufacturing cell
construction, and vehicle routing with remarkable computing efficiency in both solution quality and
time.
By discretizing the independent and dependent variables in a unique way, Shukla et al. frame
trajectory optimization as a discrete search issue. It finds global optimums effectively using quantum
computing algorithms (QCA) [20] and classical discrete search strategies. The method utilizes a
variety of approaches, including quantum search algorithms, deterministic algorithms, and
randomized algorithms, as shown on canonical issues. When compared to non-quantum approaches,
quantum algorithms show a quadratic speedup.
An overview of Machine Learning (ML) on Quantum Computers (ML-QCs) [21] is provided by
Ramezani, S. B., et al. It emphasizes the benefits of QCs, which use qubits to handle massive tensors
better than before. The review highlights the potential of quantum machines in implementing ML
algorithms, comparing them to conventional versions, and focuses on the speedup and complexity
benefits.
An overview of foundational quantum algorithms (FQA) [22] for optimization issues is given by
Wang, Y et al., and includes methods like quantum annealing and Grover search. Topics covered
include materials design, topology optimization, and other engineering design applications. The
benefits of quantum computing are discussed, with an emphasis on the difficulties of creating
trustworthy and scalable quantum algorithms for engineering optimization.
Overall, the research shows that quantum computing could be useful for optimizing energy systems,
tackling large-scale programming challenges, optimizing trajectories, learning, and developing basic

3
https://internationalpubls.com
Communications on Applied Nonlinear Analysis
ISSN: 1074-133X
Vol 30 No. 4 (2023)

quantum algorithms for optimization. One of the more intriguing approaches is the Hybrid Quantum
Gradient - Classical Approach (HQG-CA), which has the potential to solve optimization problems in
many different fields.
3. Proposed method
The paper explores the revolutionary field of quantum computing as a solution to the increasing
difficulty of real-world optimization problems that traditional algorithms lack the capacity to handle.
The paper presents the Hybrid Quantum Gradient-Classical Approach (HQG-CA), which takes into
account the quantum systems' enormous potential to transform optimization. With the use of
parameterized quantum circuits, HQG-CA uses quantum parallelism to solve nonlinear optimization
problems by simultaneously exploring solution spaces. A revolutionary solution, HQG-CA arises as
a result of quantum integration's problems, such as error correction and maintenance of coherence.
After undergoing thorough simulation evaluation, this approach shows encouraging outcomes
regarding algorithmic speedup, solution correctness, and scalability. It represents a major step
forward in the quest for real-world optimization problems that may be solved using quantum
technology.

Figure 1: Application of Quantum Computing to Nonlinear Optimization Issues

Nonlinear optimization issues are tackled by a full sequence of quantum computing methods, as
shown in Figure 1. With each new development in quantum computing, the possibility of using this
technology to solve difficult optimization issues becomes clearer. To better grasp the methodical
procedures needed in applying quantum algorithms to nonlinear optimization, the figure 1 is
provided as an illustration. Basic components of the optimization issue make up the traditional input
that starts the process. Starting parameter values, problem bounds defined by constraints, and the
desired function to optimize are all part of this. Before the quantum processing can begin, these
classical inputs must be established. The input data must undergo classical pre-processing in order
for quantum processing to be effective. Processing and analysis of initial data using classical
methods is part of this component. That the data is prepared for quantum encoding is a crucial
condition for this stage.

4
https://internationalpubls.com
Communications on Applied Nonlinear Analysis
ISSN: 1074-133X
Vol 30 No. 4 (2023)

Transforming information from a classical format into qubits (quantum bits) is the process of
quantum encoding. In this optimization problem, these qubits stand in for the parameters and
constraints. Because it establishes a connection among classical & quantum systems, this step is
essential for the next quantum processing. A quantum method developed for nonlinear optimization
issues is executed centrally in the workflow. For a more efficient exploration of the large solution
space, quantum algorithms like VQE or Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) are
used. The next step in solving a quantum problem is measuring the quantum state after processing it.
Classical bits indicating the optimum parameters constitute the measurement results. Important
information may be retrieved from the system of quantum particles by doing this measurement.
Afterwards, the classical bits that were retrieved during the quantum measurement are processed. To
make sure the result is even more precise and fits inside the parameters, classical methods are used.
After the solution has been obtained from quantum mechanics, this step ensures its quality.
The output step showcases the nonlinear optimization problem's ultimate optimized solution. Part of
this is the value of the objective function and the optimized parameter values. The output provides a
concrete outcome that can be understood and utilized within the practical setting of the optimization
issue. Performance evaluation of the quantum method is the last step. It is possible to measure the
quantum solution's conformity to the problem's specifications using these metrics. In order to grasp
the benefits and drawbacks of quantum procedures in comparison to classical methods, this stage is
essential. Quantum computing solutions for nonlinear optimization issues include a comprehensive
process, as shown in Figure 1. Every step, from taking classical input to processing quantum data
and finally producing an output, is critical in using quantum computing to solve optimization
problems. The findings from the figure 1 add to the continuing discussion on how to apply quantum
algorithms to solve real-world problems, which is important as quantum technologies progress. For
difficult nonlinear optimization problems, quantum computing's use of superposition and
entanglement allows for the simultaneous exploration of numerous solutions, greatly improving
efficiency.
𝑈 (𝑂,𝜖) 1 1
𝐴𝑆(𝑂, ∈, 𝑅, 𝛼) = 𝑈 𝑑(𝑂,𝜖,𝑅) × × (1+𝛼.𝑓−𝛿.𝑂 ) (1)
𝑟 √1+𝛽.𝑅 2 +𝛾.𝑂 3

In the equation (1), the quantum advantage score 𝐴𝑆(𝑂, ∈, 𝑅, 𝛼) is used to measure how much better
a quantum algorithm performs compared to its classical equivalent. The execution time of the
quantum method is represented by the function 𝑈𝑟 (𝑂, 𝜖, 𝑅), whereas the execution time of the
classical algorithm for an issue with size 𝑂 & precision 𝜖 is represented by the function 𝑈𝑑 (𝑂, 𝜖).
The total quantum advantage score is affected by the quantum speedup, issue size, and algorithmic
complexity; these elements are taken into consideration by the weighting factors introduced by the
parameters 𝛽, 𝛾, and 𝛼. The non-linear decay factor 𝛿 captures the declining rewards associated with
higher issue sizes, and the 1 + 𝛼. 𝑓 −𝛿.𝑂 presents it. This augmentation is a reflection of the fact that
quantum advantage may get saturated or slows down as the problem becomes larger. Incorporating
all of these elements enables for a more complex and thorough examination of the quantum method's
effectiveness with respect to issue features and algorithmic complexities.
√𝛽.𝑅 2 +𝛽.𝑂 3 1 𝜃.𝑂 2
𝑆𝐴(𝑂, ∈, 𝑅, 𝜇, 𝜃) = 1 − × (1+𝜇.𝑓−𝜗.𝑂 ) + (2)
√𝛼.𝑓 𝛿.𝑂 +𝜖.𝑅 3 √𝜑.𝑓 𝜔.𝑅 +𝑌.𝑓 −𝛹.𝑂

5
https://internationalpubls.com
Communications on Applied Nonlinear Analysis
ISSN: 1074-133X
Vol 30 No. 4 (2023)

Multiple variables are included in the equation (2) 𝑆𝐴(𝑂, ∈, 𝑅, 𝜇, 𝜃), which stands for solution
accuracy, in order to describe the complex correlations among issue size (𝑂), 𝑆𝐴 (solution accuracy),
quantum advantages (𝑅), and other factors that impact it. A constant factor is represented by 𝛼, while
the linear impact of the size of the issue on the denominator is accounted for by 𝛿. The total accuracy
measure is affected by the non-linear relationship between accuracy and quantum advantage, which
is illustrated by the cubic and quadratic factors, ∈ and 𝑅, respectively. The complex link between
accuracy and issue size is captured by adding 𝜇, which modulates the exponential component
through a scaling factor. An additional component impacting the correlation between issue size and
precision is the newly introduced parameter 𝜃. A more complex connection between quantum
advantage, issue size, and accuracy is shown by the additional layer of non-linear dependency
introduced by the terms 𝜑, 𝜔, 𝑌, and 𝛹. In order to comprehend the many factors that affect the
precision of solutions in quantum computing environments, the equation (2) provides a thorough
analytical framework.
𝑃𝑜𝑙𝑦(𝑈𝑐𝑙𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑙 ).𝑙𝑜𝑔2 (𝑈𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑢𝑚 ) 𝑙𝑜𝑔2 (𝑅𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑢𝑚 ) 𝐻𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑢𝑚
𝑇(𝑂) = 4 × (1 + log⁡(𝑂)
)×3 (3)
√𝑂 √log⁡(𝐻𝑐𝑙𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑙 )

The overall performance parameter perhaps linked to the efficiency or speedup of a quantum method
while addressing a nonlinear optimization issue relative to its classical equivalent, is represented by
𝑇(𝑂) in the equation (3). The classic algorithm's execution time is described by the polynomial
function 𝑃𝑜𝑙𝑦(𝑈𝑐𝑙𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑙 ). The denominator and numerator include logarithmic and polynomial
components, which add complexity to the representation of the possible quantum speedup. The
influence of both issue size (𝑂) & quantum complexity is shown in the second term, which provides
a logarithmic squared reliance on the quantum query difficulty, (𝑈𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑢𝑚 ). To illustrate the
interaction between classical and quantum gradient evaluation complexity, the last term incorporates
a cubic root connection with a logarithmic component in the denominator. Quantum query
complexity, classical gradient evaluations complexity, and quantum gradient evaluation complexity
are probably related to the parameters (𝑅𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑢𝑚 ),⁡⁡(𝐻𝑐𝑙𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑙 ), and 𝐻𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑢𝑚 correspondingly. In
order to better capture subtleties in the HQG-CA scalability study for nonlinear optimization
problems; this increased degree of complexity is being used.

6
https://internationalpubls.com
Communications on Applied Nonlinear Analysis
ISSN: 1074-133X
Vol 30 No. 4 (2023)

Figure 2: Hybrid Quantum Gradient - Classical Approach (HQG-CA)

An advanced approach to solving nonlinear optimization problems, the Hybrid Quantum Gradient -
Classical Approach (HQG-CA) shown in Figure 2 combines the best features of quantum and
classical computers in a seamless manner. Each of the interdependent stages of this novel workflow
contributes to the ultimate objective of combining classical algorithms with the extraordinary power
of quantum processing. The path starts with classical input, which is fundamental as it contains the
optimization problem's core elements, such as the objective function, restrictions, and starting
parameters. These components are the foundation for the hybrid processing. As a first step, classical
pre-processing involves analysing and formatting the input data using classical techniques. By
making sure the data is ready for quantum encoding, this crucial step improves compatibility with the
next quantum operations.
At its core, the HQG-CA process is the Quantum Encoding block, which converts conventional data
into qubits. In order to accomplish this change, parameterized quantum circuits are used, which store
information about potential solutions. This stage utilizes quantum parallelism, a characteristic of
quantum computing, to enable the concurrent exploration of several solution spaces. Following this,
the Quantum Processing block runs the HQG-CA algorithm, which optimizes inside the quantum
state space using quantum gradient information. This basic quantum advantage allows efficient
exploration of solution spaces, which might outperform conventional approaches.
Important post-quantum processing functions are performed by the Quantum Measurement block. In
order to get classical bits that represent the optimal parameters, it is necessary to measure the
quantum state. Transferring from the quantum to the classical realm for additional refining is made
possible by this critical bridge step. The next step is classical post-processing, which uses classical
methods to refine the answer and check for constraints. The generated solution is guaranteed to be
consistent with the provided constraints, which improves the dependability of the optimized
parameters in the end. The HQG-CA procedure continues with the Output block, which displays the
optimal solution in its final form. The optimized parameter settings and matching objective function
values are included in this, which provides realistic results. A careful waltz between classical and

7
https://internationalpubls.com
Communications on Applied Nonlinear Analysis
ISSN: 1074-133X
Vol 30 No. 4 (2023)

quantum computing underpins the whole thing, demonstrating how the two paradigms may work
together to solve difficult optimization issues.
Critical to HQG-CA's efficacy is the Performance Evaluation block, which uses a number of
measures to draw findings. Scalability, correctness of solutions, and algorithmic speedup are some of
the possible criteria. To fully grasp the potential of HQG-CA and its practical application, it is
necessary to conduct extensive simulation tests and compare them with traditional alternatives.
Figure 2 illustrates the HQG-CA approach's complex procedures, emphasizing the complementary
nature of quantum and conventional computing. With the on-going development of quantum
computing, this process offers a potential solution to optimization problems in the real world. As a
leading contender for future optimization developments, HQG-CA provides expedited solutions with
better accuracy and scalability. A flexible and potent optimization method, HQG-CA integrates
conventional optimization methods with quantum computing, capitalizing on the advantages of both
perspectives to effectively resolve complicated problems.
1 𝑇 𝐹 𝐺 𝐼
𝑂𝐸 = 𝛽 ∑𝑂𝑗=1 (𝑈𝑑𝑗 ) . (1 − 𝐹 𝑟𝑗 ) . (1 − 𝐺𝑟𝑗 ) . (1 − 𝐼𝑓𝑗 ) (4)
𝑑𝑗 𝑑𝑗 𝑟𝑗 𝑑𝑗

The equation (4) uses the Hybrid Quantum-Classical Genetic technique (HQG-CA), a quantum
technique designed to solve nonlinear optimization problems, and its overall efficiency is denoted by
𝑂𝐸. A weighting factor denoted by 𝛽 and the amount of experiments denoted by 𝑂 are both used in
this setting. From one experiment to the next, the sum ∑𝑂𝑗=1, is applied. In the 𝑗th experiment, the
quantum state is represented by 𝑈𝑑𝑗 and 𝑇𝑑𝑗 . The 𝐹𝑑𝑗 stands for the quantum computation's error
rate, and 𝐹𝑟𝑗 ⁡for the quantum state's fidelity, which indicates how accurate and near to the ideal
solution it is. The entanglement entropies of the quantum as well as classical phases in the 𝑗th
experiment are⁡𝐼𝑓𝑗 and 𝐼𝑑𝑗 , respectively, which measure the level of correlation with complexity
inside the quantum system. A thorough assessment of HQG-efficiency CA's for addressing nonlinear
optimization issues is sought after by the equation (4), which takes into account various
experimentally-observed metrics like speedup, rate of errors, devotion, and entanglement
characteristics of quantum states.
𝑅(𝜃) = ∑𝑂𝑗=1 |〈𝛹𝑗 (𝜃)|𝐼|𝛹𝑗 (𝜃)〉 − 𝐹𝑗 |2 ⊗ (∑𝑁
𝑘=1〈𝜑𝑘 (𝜃)|𝐷|𝜑𝑘 (𝜃)〉) (5)
The Quantum Cost Function with Entanglement, important in the field of hybrid quantum-classical
optimization algorithms like HQG-CA, is represented by 𝑅(𝜃) in Equation (5). The accuracy of the
parameterized quantum states in representing the anticipated an eigenvalue of the Hamiltonian
matrices 𝐼 is measured by the function |𝛹𝑗 (𝜃)⟩. The composite character of the quantum state being
considered is shown by the summing over 𝑂 states. A tensor product, denoted as ⊗, and an extra
summation over states |𝜑𝑘 (𝜃)⟩, is introduced by the entanglement factor. This illustrates how
quantum systems are entangled and how the optimization landscape is characterized by the complex
interdependence of quantum states. An operator working on each state |𝜑𝑘 (𝜃)⟩ is represented by 𝐷,
and the 𝑗th predicted eigenvalue is denoted by 𝐹𝑗 . In order to use quantum algorithms for
optimization problems, the general difficulty of the equation (5) must represent the subtle
connections and entanglement present in quantum systems.

8
https://internationalpubls.com
Communications on Applied Nonlinear Analysis
ISSN: 1074-133X
Vol 30 No. 4 (2023)

∇2 𝑅(𝜃) = 2 ∑𝑂𝑗=1[〈𝛹𝑗 (𝜃)|𝐼|𝛹𝑗 (𝜃)〉 − 𝐹𝑗 ] ∇2 (𝛹𝑗 (𝜃)|𝐼|𝛹𝑗 (𝜃)) (6)

Within the framework of the HQG-CA optimisation technique, the Quantum Gradient using Higher-
Order Derivatives is defined in Equation (6). With regard to the parameters 𝜃, the equation captures
the second derivatives (∇2 ) of the quantum form cost function 𝑅(𝜃). 𝑂 is the total amount of
quantum states, where 𝛹𝑗 (𝜃) is the set of quantum states defined by 𝜃, and 𝐼 is for the Hamiltonian
operator in the equation (6). The equation is a summation across all quantum states of the difference
between their predicted energies and their associated energy eigenvalues. Adding second-order
derivatives complicates matters by revealing the optimization landscape's curvature. This complex
quantum gradient computation allows for a more thorough investigation of the quantum states
throughout optimization, which adds to the understanding of the HQG-CA algorithm's convergence
behaviour.

Figure 3: Implementation of HQG-CA in various industries in the Real World

At the forefront of innovation is the Hybrid Quantum Gradient - Classical Approach (HQG-CA), a
robust and flexible method for solving complicated optimization problems in a wide range of sectors.
Figure 3 gives a thorough outline of the many uses of HQG-CA in the finance, machine learning, &
logistics industries. There is much promise that this hybrid quantum-classical method will transform
optimization procedures and alter the environment of practical applications. When it comes to
optimizing portfolios, HQG-CA truly stands out in the finance industry. In order to optimize returns
while limiting risks, financial firms are continuously faced with the task of effectively distributing
resources within portfolios.
By taking use of HQG-inherent CA's parallelism in this domain, optimization may be done more
quickly and with more efficiency. With HQG-CA's quantum capabilities, financial decision-makers
may explore large solution spaces and get helpful information for allocating resources optimally.
When it comes to Machine Learning, HQG-CA demonstrates its flexibility by handling the
complexities of changing model parameters. Timely convergence and precise optimization are of the
utmost importance in machine learning employment. To drastically shorten the time it takes to
modify the parameters, HQG-CA makes use of its quantum abilities to search solution areas in a
highly distributed way. This improves the performance of ML algorithms and paves the way for

9
https://internationalpubls.com
Communications on Applied Nonlinear Analysis
ISSN: 1074-133X
Vol 30 No. 4 (2023)

future work on solving the difficult optimization problems that arise during model training and
adaption.
The exceptional route optimization capabilities of HQG-CA are advantageous to the logistics
industry. The difficulty of determining the most efficient routes to save expenses and maximize
efficiency is one that logistics organizations must constantly contend with. Companies may improve
their logistics and supply chain management efficiency by implementing HQG-CA. Finding optimal
routes, lowering transportation costs, and boosting overall logistics performance are all aided by
HQG-CA's capacity to rapidly explore complicated solution spaces. An essential part of assessing
HQG-performance CA's in these various sectors is the Simulation Experiment block. Important
performance metrics, such as algorithmic speedup, solution correctness, and scalability, are
evaluated through extensive testing. The paper sheds light on the usefulness and reliability of HQG-
CA in various settings.
A comprehensive evaluation of HQG-CA's ability to solve nonlinear optimization problems is
provided by the Comprehensive Evaluation block, which gathers and presents the results of the
simulation tests. Each industry's distinct requirements and difficulties are considered in this analysis.
It is clear that HQG-CA can adapt and effectively solve optimization problems that are unique to
different industries, emphasizing its revolutionary significance in defining the optimization
approaches of the future. Figure 3 extends the illustrations by demonstrating the numerous uses of
HQG-CA in finances, Machine Learning, as well as Logistics, and by emphasizing its ability to
transform nonlinear optimization procedures in various sectors. The versatility and efficiency of
HQG-CA in handling specific optimization problems underline its revolutionary significance in
defining the trajectory of optimization approaches as it keeps finding its way into more and more
industries. This all-encompassing perspective establishes HQG-CA as a formidable instrument that
can propel substantial progress in its approach for addressing multi-domain optimization challenges.
𝑀𝑎𝑥𝑖𝑚𝑖𝑧𝑒⁡𝐹(𝑆) − 𝜇 × 𝑉𝑎𝑟[𝑆] + 𝛾 × 𝐷𝑒𝑡[𝐷] + 𝛼 + 𝑇𝑟[𝐷] (7)
Quantum-Inspired Portfolio Optimisation with Multiple objectives Terms is defined in Equation (7)
using an objective function. Earning the highest possible expected return 𝐹(𝑆)⁡on a portfolio is the
ultimate objective. The 𝑉𝑎𝑟[𝑆], wherein 𝜇 is the value of a parameter that controls the investor's risk
aversion, incorporates the trade-off among return and risk. The optimization becomes much more
complicated due to the quantum-inspired terms. Incorporating the determinant, 𝐷𝑒𝑡[𝐷], & trace,
𝑇𝑟[𝐷], of the matrix of covariance 𝐷, these indicate portfolio coherence and correlation metrics
inspired by quantum theory. The significance of the determinant component is scaled by the
coefficient 𝛾, and the trace term is similarly scaled by 𝛼. The HQG-CA method's flexibility in
handling multi-objective optimization problems is demonstrated by these terms, which inform the
algorithm address real-world financial problems by taking into account both conventional risk and
return metrics and quantum-inspired ones.
𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑖𝑚𝑖𝑧𝑒⁡𝑍(𝜃) = 〈𝛹𝑗 (𝜃)|𝐼|𝛹𝑗 (𝜃)〉 + 𝜇(ℎ(𝜃) − 𝑑)2 (8)
Lagrangian are functions used in restricted optimization problems and in the equation (8) 𝑍(𝜃)
stands for them. The collection of variables related to a quantum state that is represented by a
parametric circuit is symbolized by 𝜃. This optimization issue or the quantum system's dynamics is

10
https://internationalpubls.com
Communications on Applied Nonlinear Analysis
ISSN: 1074-133X
Vol 30 No. 4 (2023)

encoded by the Hamiltonian operator 𝐼, which is involved in 〈𝛹𝑗 (𝜃)|𝐼|𝛹𝑗 (𝜃)〉. To enforce a non-
linear constraint, the Lagrange multiplier 𝜇 is used in the equation 𝜇(ℎ(𝜃) − 𝑑)2 ⁡where ℎ(𝜃) is a
non-linear restriction function that evaluates the quantum state parameters and 𝑑 is the desired value
of the constraint. To make sure the non-linear constraint is satisfied during optimization; this penalty
term is included in the Lagrangian. As a result, fulfilling the non-linear constraint and maximizing
the objective function are both part of the minimization process. This shows how the HQG-CA
method approaches optimization with real-world constraints, which is advanced and thorough.
An innovative approach to solving difficult nonlinear optimization problems is presented, the Hybrid
Quantum Gradient-Classical Approach, or HQG-CA. This method addresses the drawbacks of
classical methods. The HQG-CA algorithm takes use of quantum parallelism by using parameterized
quantum circuits to simultaneously explore many solution spaces. By combining quantum and
classical methods in a novel way, this method shows promise for improving logistical routes,
optimizing financial portfolios, and adjusting machine learning models. Extensive simulations
demonstrate HQG-CA's impressive performance, showcasing algorithmic speedup, solution
correctness, and scalability, despite the inherent limitations of quantum coherency and error
correction. This discovery represents a major advancement in the search for practical optimization
solutions that are driven by quantum mechanics.
4. Results and Discussion
Investigating the efficacy of quantum computing approaches, this study zeroes attention on the
Hybrid Quantum Gradient - Classical Approach (HQG-CA) that has been suggested as a solution to
nonlinear optimization problems. By comparing HQG-CA to both traditional and standalone
quantum methods, one can evaluate their efficiency, accuracy, scalability, and speedup in addressing
computing problems, as well as their potential for revolutionizing the field.

Figure 4(a): Algorithmic Speedup Analysis is compared with HQG-CA

Figure 4(b): Algorithmic Speedup Analysis is compared with I-QA
When assessing quantum computing methods for nonlinear optimization issues, algorithmic speedup
analysis is an essential component. Whether quantum computing can beat classical algorithms is a
key component in its promise to speed up optimization procedures. The suggested Hybrid Quantum

11
https://internationalpubls.com
Communications on Applied Nonlinear Analysis
ISSN: 1074-133X
Vol 30 No. 4 (2023)

Gradient - Classical Approach (HQG-CA) and other quantum algorithms are compared to more
conventional approaches in terms of their computing speed in this analysis. Specifically, people are
interested in quantifying the efficiency benefits of quantum parallelism and superposition.
Researchers can determine the quantum advantage in tackling nonlinear optimization problems by
evaluating the algorithmic speedup. People focus on the effect on convergence rates of the HQG-use
of parameterized quantum circuits and quantum gradient information. This investigation reveals how
quantum algorithms may solve complicated optimization problems faster than classical algorithms,
which shows that quantum computing has a real chance of changing the game in nonlinear
optimization. Figure 4(a): The result of comparing Algorithmic Speedup Analysis with Hybrid
Quantum Gradient - Classical Approach (HQG-CA) is a remarkable correlation of 96.2%. Figure
4(b): By comparing the Algorithmic Speedup Analysis with the Individual Quantum Approach (I-
QA), a remarkable correlation of 91.3% is revealed.

Figure 5(a): Accuracy Analysis is compared with HQG-CA

Figure 5(b): Accuracy Analysis is compared with I-QA
Quantum computing algorithms, especially the Hybrid Quantum Gradient - Classical Approach
(HQG-CA), for nonlinear optimization problems rely heavily on accuracy analysis to determine their
effectiveness. The algorithms' real-world usefulness is heavily dependent on how accurately they
solve problems. This study examines the effect of quantum parallelism and superposition on solution
fidelity by contrasting the performance of classical and quantum algorithms. People focus on the
impact on solution accuracy of the HQG-use of CA's parameterized quantum circuits and quantum
gradient information. Researchers can determine the algorithm's resilience in dealing with nonlinear
optimization problems by evaluating the consistency and dependability of quantum solutions across
different contexts. To find out if quantum computing can solve real-world nonlinear optimization
problems accurately, this study sheds light on the trade-offs between algorithmic speedup and
solution correctness. Figure 5(a): A significant correlation of 97.5% is displayed in the Accuracy
Analysis when compared with the Hybrid Quantum Gradient - Classical Approach (HQG-CA). The
same Accuracy Analysis shows a strong correlation of 91.6% when compared with the Individual
Quantum Approach (I-QA), as shown in Figure 5(b).

12
https://internationalpubls.com
Communications on Applied Nonlinear Analysis
ISSN: 1074-133X
Vol 30 No. 4 (2023)

Figure 6(a): Scalability Analysis is compared with HQG-CA

Figure 6(b): Scalability Analysis is compared with I-QA
Evaluating the potential of quantum computing methods, especially the Hybrid Quantum Gradient -
Classical Approach (HQG-CA), for nonlinear optimization problems requires a scalability analysis.
Practical applications rely on these algorithms' capacity to efficiently address bigger problem sizes.
The scalability of quantum algorithms with respect to the increase in task complexity is the main
subject of this analysis. Researchers focus on the HQG-CA's ability to efficiently handle an
increasing number of variables and restrictions. Whether quantum advantages remain as problem
sizes grow is an important question to ask when thinking about scalability. This analysis aims to shed
light on the HQG-CA's potential scalability in optimization domains by analyzing its performance
across different scales of optimization problems. By doing consequently, it contributes to our
understanding of how quantum computing can tackle complex, real-world nonlinear optimization
problems. Figure 6(a): A remarkable correlation of 98.3% is shown in the Scalability Analysis when
compared to the Hybrid Quantum Gradient - Classical Approach (HQG-CA). Figure 6(b): A
remarkable correlation of 91.3% is seen in the same Scalability Analysis when compared with
Individual Quantum Approach (I-QA).

Figure 7(a): Overall Efficiency Analysis is compared with HQG-CA

Figure 7(b): Overall Efficiency Analysis is compared with I-QA
A thorough evaluation of the possibilities of quantum computing methods, particularly the Hybrid
Quantum Gradient - Classical Approach (HQG-CA), for solving nonlinear optimization problems

13
https://internationalpubls.com
Communications on Applied Nonlinear Analysis
ISSN: 1074-133X
Vol 30 No. 4 (2023)

requires an overall efficiency analysis. This comprehensive study takes scalability, solution
correctness, and algorithmic speedup into account. Its ultimate goal is to shed light on the multi-
dimensional and multi-conditional behavior of quantum algorithms. To determine how well the
HQG-CA solves complicated optimization problems, it is thoroughly tested using parameterized
quantum circuits, quantum gradient information, and conventional optimization techniques. The
algorithm's practical viability can be evaluated by combining findings from different analyses and
comparing the benefits against any drawbacks. Quantum computing has the ability to transform
problem-solving procedures in various domains, such as machine learning and finance, and this
comprehensive review adds to our knowledge of its efficacy in nonlinear optimization. It promotes
progress in computational approaches. Figure 7(a): A remarkable correlation of 98.3% is shown in
the Overall Efficiency Analysis when compared with the Hybrid Quantum Gradient - Classical
Approach (HQG-CA). In Figure 7(b), people can see that there is a significant correlation of 91.5%
between the Overall Efficiency Analysis and the Individual Quantum Approach (I-QA).
Overall efficiency, scalability, accuracy, and algorithmic speedup evaluations all point to the
suggested Hybrid Quantum Gradient - Classical Approach (HQG-CA) as the most effective and
flexible approach. The revolutionary power of quantum computing in fields of nonlinear
optimization can be better understood with the help of these results.
5. Conclusion
The proposed Hybrid Quantum Gradient -Classical Approach (HQG-CA) is an important step toward
solving the increasingly complex optimization problems in the real world, which classical algorithms
fail to efficiently handle. This research on quantum computing algorithms for nonlinear optimization
problems is a major step in the right direction. The utilization of quantum computing has been
prompted by the urgent requirement for novel and scalable solutions to the widespread occurrence of
nonlinear optimization problems in many sectors. One innovative approach to using quantum
parallelism for exploring solution spaces simultaneously is the HQG-CA, which uses parameterized
quantum circuits and quantum gradient information. Though groundbreaking, the study does note
that maintaining quantum coherence, addressing errors, and working within hardware constraints are
all significant challenges. The remarkable capability of HQG-CA to solve real-world optimization
issues is demonstrated by its numerous applications in finance, machine learning, and logistics,
which demonstrate its adaptability and usefulness. By comparing HQG-CA to classical alternatives,
extensive simulation experiments show that it is more successful in terms of algorithmic speedup,
solution correctness, and scalability. This study provides a thorough assessment of HQG-CA and its
potential to solve nonlinear optimization issues; it shows how quantum computing can revolutionize
the way people approach and solve difficult real-world problems. A shining example of innovation in
the rapidly developing field of quantum technologies, HQG-CA is set to revolutionize optimization
approaches and make substantial contributions to progress across a wide range of industries.
References
[1] Lubasch, M., Joo, J., Moinier, P., Kiffner, M., & Jaksch, D. (2020). Variational quantum
algorithms for nonlinear problems. Physical Review A, 101(1), 010301.

14
https://internationalpubls.com
Communications on Applied Nonlinear Analysis
ISSN: 1074-133X
Vol 30 No. 4 (2023)

[2] Emani, P. S., Warrell, J., Anticevic, A., Bekiranov, S., Gandal, M., McConnell, M. J., ... &
Harrow, A. W. (2021). Quantum computing at the frontiers of biological sciences. Nature
Methods, 18(7), 701-709.
[3] Giani, A., & Eldredge, Z. (2021). Quantum computing opportunities in renewable energy. SN
Computer Science, 2(5), 393.
[4] Dodin, I. Y., & Startsev, E. A. (2021). On applications of quantum computing to plasma
simulations. Physics of Plasmas, 28(9).
[5] Herman, D., Googin, C., Liu, X., Galda, A., Safro, I., Sun, Y., ... & Alexeev, Y. (2022). A
survey of quantum computing for finance. arXiv preprint arXiv:2201.02773.
[6] Egger, D. J., Gambella, C., Marecek, J., McFaddin, S., Mevissen, M., Raymond, R., ... &
Yndurain, E. (2020). Quantum computing for finance: State-of-the-art and future
prospects. IEEE Transactions on Quantum Engineering, 1, 1-24.
[7] Ajagekar, A., & You, F. (2022). Quantum computing and quantum artificial intelligence for
renewable and sustainable energy: A emerging prospect towards climate
neutrality. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 165, 112493.
[8] Liu, Z., Li, S., & Ge, Y. (2021). A quantum computing-based numerical method of mixed-
integer optimal control problems under uncertainty for alkali–surfactant–polymer
flooding. Engineering Optimization, 53(3), 531-550.
[9] Biamonte, J. (2021). Universal variational quantum computation. Physical Review A, 103(3),
L030401.
[10] Khan, A. T., Cao, X., Li, S., Hu, B., & Katsikis, V. N. (2021). Quantum beetle antennae
search: a novel technique for the constrained portfolio optimization problem. Science China
Information Sciences, 64, 1-14.
[11] Puneet Sharma, & Pawan Kumar Tiwari. (2023). Numerical Simulation of Optimized
Placement of Distibuted Generators in Standard Radial Distribution System Using Improved
Computations. International Journal on Recent Technologies in Mechanical and Electrical
Engineering, 10(3), 10–17.
[12] Outeiral, C., Strahm, M., Shi, J., Morris, G. M., Benjamin, S. C., & Deane, C. M. (2021). The
prospects of quantum computing in computational molecular biology. Wiley Interdisciplinary
Reviews: Computational Molecular Science, 11(1), e1481.
[13] Petschnigg, C., Brandstötter, M., Pichler, H., Hofbaur, M., & Dieber, B. (2019, May).
Quantum computation in robotic science and applications. In 2019 International Conference
on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) (pp. 803-810). IEEE.
[14] Luckow, A., Klepsch, J., & Pichlmeier, J. (2021). Quantum computing: Towards industry
reference problems. Digitale Welt, 5, 38-45.
[15] Prasanthi, A., Shareef, H., Errouissi, R., Asna, M., & Wahyudie, A. (2021). Quantum chaotic
butterfly optimization algorithm with ranking strategy for constrained optimization
problems. IEEE Access, 9, 114587-114608.
[16] Zanger, B., Mendl, C. B., Schulz, M., & Schreiber, M. (2021). Quantum algorithms for
solving ordinary differential equations via classical integration methods. Quantum, 5, 502.
[17] Nannicini, G. (2019). Performance of hybrid quantum-classical variational heuristics for
combinatorial optimization. Physical Review E, 99(1), 013304.

15
https://internationalpubls.com
Communications on Applied Nonlinear Analysis
ISSN: 1074-133X
Vol 30 No. 4 (2023)

[18] Motta, M., Sun, C., Tan, A. T., O’Rourke, M. J., Ye, E., Minnich, A. J., ... & Chan, G. K. L.
(2020). Determining eigenstates and thermal states on a quantum computer using quantum
imaginary time evolution. Nature Physics, 16(2), 205-210.
[19] Ajagekar, A., & You, F. (2019). Quantum computing for energy systems optimization:
Challenges and opportunities. Energy, 179, 76-89.
[20] Ajagekar, A., Humble, T., & You, F. (2020). Quantum computing based hybrid solution
strategies for large-scale discrete-continuous optimization problems. Computers & Chemical
Engineering, 132, 106630.
[21] Shukla, A., & Vedula, P. (2019). Trajectory optimization using quantum computing. Journal
of Global Optimization, 75, 199-225.
[22] Dariusz Spałek (2023). Role of Artificial Intelligence in Energy Management: Acta
Energetica Insights. Acta Energetica, (03), 29–35.
[23] Ramezani, S. B., Sommers, A., Manchukonda, H. K., Rahimi, S., & Amirlatifi, A. (2020,
July). Machine learning algorithms in quantum computing: A survey. In 2020 International
joint conference on neural networks (IJCNN) (pp. 1-8). IEEE.
[24] Wang, Y., Kim, J. E., & Suresh, K. (2023). Opportunities and challenges of quantum
computing for engineering optimization. Journal of Computing and Information Science in
Engineering, 23(6).
[25] Distributed attribute-based encryption with small ciphertext. (2023). Advances in the Theory
of Nonlinear Analysis and Its Application, 7(3), 30-44.

16
https://internationalpubls.com