FLOOD

Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education
Region IV-A CALABARZON
SCHOOLS DIVISION OF BATANGAS CITY
TABANGAO INTEGRATED SCHOOL
Tabangao Aplaya, Batangas City
PREFACE
The contingency plan Tabangao Integrated School was crafted through a
collaborative effort of internal and external stakeholders directly and indirectly
involved in dealing with actual disaster emergencies. The different scenarios during
a disaster were anticipated to address the needs of the students, teaching and non-
teaching staff of Tabangao Integrated School. In to share human material resources
and stay connected, coordinated, and protected during actual field operations. Under
the legal basis of Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Act of 2010 (DRRM Act
of 2010 or RA 10121) which stated as “a management process that analyzes specific
potential events or emerging situations that might threaten society or the
environment and establishes arrangements in advance to enable timely, effective
and appropriate responses to such events and situations”. School Disaster Risk
Reduction Management (SDRRM) became the immediate responsive team in times
of disaster. The success of this contingency plan is primarily hinged on collective
efforts and effective involvement of SDRRM Team

TABANGAO APLAYA, BATANGAS CITY
(043) 702-2094  [email protected]
A. Introduction:
Tabangao Integrated School is an institution aimed for scholarly uplifting the
academic and educational skills of the students. The school is located at Tabangao
Aplaya, Batangas City comprising 10, 203 square meters. Tabangao Aplaya is a
coastal barangay lying at the western portion of Batangas City and is one of the
outlying areas of the component city of Batangas City. The school is in a barangay
with partly urban areas with remaining rural areas.
Table 1: Distribution of Students Population according to sex at birth
SEX AT BIRTH POPULATION PERCENTAGE

MALE 477 57%
FEMALE 357 43%
TOTAL 834 100%
Table 2: Distribution of Population of Teaching Staff according to sex at birth

MALE 4 10%
FEMALE 38 90%
TOTAL 42 100%
Table 3: Distribution of Population of Non-Teaching Staff according to sex at birth

MALE 0 0%
FEMALE 5 100%
TOTAL 762 100%

Figure 1: Satellite
Image of Tabangao
Integrated School

Figure 2: Ground Level Evacuation Plan of Tabangao


B. Hazard identification:
Table 4: CP Form 1 – Hazard Analysis
HAZARD PROBABILITY IMPACT AVERAGE RANK

RATE REMARKS RATE REMARKS
Flood 5 Identify areas prone to flashflood 5 Most communities live in flood-prone 5 1
areas
Typhoon 4 Geographic Location: Past experiences such as 4 Most communities live in flood-prone 4 2.5
Typhoon Rosita, Falcon, Jenny and Hannah areas
Earthquake 3 Geographic Location 5 Near the Calamba fault line 4 2.5
Epidemic 3 Crowded area, poor health practices, unhealthy 3 Overpopulated communities 3 7
environment
Bomb Scare 3 Easy access, overpopulated, crowded area 3 Overpopulated communities 3 7
Fire 3 Crowded area, over-populated, octopus wiring, 3 Crowded residential areas 3 7
illegal electrical connection
Volcanic 3 Geographic location 3 Most communities live near Taal 3 7
Eruption Volcano
4 Identified areas prone to landslide 3 Most communities live in landslide- 3.5 4
Land Slide prone areas
Chemical 3 Past experiences on chemical hazards 3 Communities near Malampaya/ Shell 3 7

Hazards Refinery/JG Summit
3 Identified areas prone to storm surge 2 Most communities near the coastal 2.5 10
Storm Surge areas

As depicted in the above table on the probability and impact of the different
disasters reported, flood got the number 1 rank with an average of 5. Then it was
shortly followed by typhoon and earthquake with an average score of 4 followed by a
landslide with an average score of 3.5 while flashflood, epidemic, bomb scare, fire,
chemical hazards, and volcanic eruption with an average of 3, and storm surge rank
least with an average score of 2.5 respectively.
C. Hazard to Plan for Rain Induced Flooding
Based on the assessment of the hazards, Tabangao IS requires having
a contingency plan for flooding that shall help ensure preparedness for
effective disaster preparedness and response in the barangay. This planning
process requires, however, a clear understanding of how a hazard occurs, or
typhoon in this case, to anticipate the causes and damages.

The anatomy of rain-induced flooding is shown below:
Table 5: CP Form 2: Anatomy of Rain – Induced Flooding
EXISTING
ROOT CAUSES EARLY WARNING SIGNS TRIGGERING FACTORS
MITIGATING MEASURES
The flash flood incident may be enhanced by  Early warning signs
● Improper Waste Disposal ● Physical manifestations (heavy
the following conditions: Emergency Siren/bell
rain, strong sea currents, Public Announcement System
● School Situated near sea ● High tide (making it easier for water
cockroaches start to come out
of the drainages) to overflow)
● Terrain is relatively flat making  Information dissemination
it a catch basin  Weekly clean up drives
● Functiona lCCTV cameras ● Heavy rainfall  Proper waste segregation and
● Poor planning disposal
● Tri-media
● Low-lying area  Unclogging of drainage and canals
● Text brigade
● Surrounded by residential and
● Paging system commercial area
● Improper waste disposal
● Clogged canal/drainage

The root cause of the flooding would be the improper waste disposal resulting to
clogged drainages during heavy rainfalls. The geographical location of Tabangao IS
contributed to its inherent flooding risk, being situated near sea in addition to it
terrain is relatively flat, making it a catch basin. The early warning signs that need to
be monitored are mostly physical manifestations: heavy rain, strong river currents,
cockroaches starting to come out of the drainages. Nevertheless, in terms of
mitigation, strong implementation of the environment code is being implemented by
the school. The school also reinforces this by conducting weekly clean-up drives.
Moreover, emergency sirens, constantly monitoring the sea water level and public
announcement system are also in place. In terms of preparedness, numerous
activities, trainings, and plans are in line to be drafted and implemented. Evacuation
centers are present, emergency drills are conducted, rescue and medic volunteers
are organized, and there exists an information system through social media

D. Scenarios
The following table describes scenarios that may occur in the event of a flood incident in the school
Table 6: CP Form 3A: Scenario Generation for Flood Incidence in Tabangao Integrated School
PARTICULARS
BAD WORSE WORST
(CAN BE CUSTOMIZED)
Flood arises resulting to the ff:
 Uneasy access to some parts
of the school.
Water rises around the school  Caused health problems like
General Description of Event Continuous rain.
premises due to due to heavy rain. leptospirosis and other skin
diseases.
 Affects the pupil’s attendance.
Damaged of the school properties.
No. of Affected Learners (Male, Female, IP,

190 381 762
Muslim, PWD)
No. of Dead Learners (Male, Female, IP,
19 38 57
Muslim, PWD)
No. of Injured Learners (Male, Female, IP,
38 57 190
Muslim, PWD)

No. of Missing Learners (Male, Female, IP,

19 38 57
Muslim, PWD)
No. of Affected Teaching Personnel (Male,
10 21 38
Female)
No. of Dead Teaching Personnel (Male,
2 10 19
Female)
No. of Injured Teaching Personnel (Male,
10 21 38
Female)
No. of Missing Teaching Personnel (Male,
2 10 19
Female)
No. of Affected Non-Teaching Personnel (Male,
2 3 5
Female)
No. of Dead Non-Teaching Personnel (Male,
1 2 3
Female)

No. of Missing Non-Teaching Personnel (Male,

1 2 3
Female)
EFFECTS
Infrastructure
- Totally damaged CLs
- Partially damaged CLs Damaged other infrastructures and
Partially damaged CLs Totally damaged CLs
- Damaged WASH facilities ancillary facilities (e.g., laboratories,
- Damaged other infrastructures and clinic, library)
ancillary facilities (e.g., laboratories,
clinic, library)
Non-infrastructure
- Damaged furniture and fixtures
- Damaged learning resources and self-
learning modules
- Damaged Information and
Damaged technical-
Communication Technology (ICT) Damaged learning resources
vocational supplies and Total furniture and fixtures
equipment and self-learning modules
equipment
- Damaged laboratory equipment
- Damaged medical and dental
equipment and supplies
- damaged technical-vocational supplies
and equipment
Communication Weak internet connection No internet Connection All Communication is down

Power/ Electricity Power brownout for 2 hours Power brownout for 1 day Power blackout for 1 week
Transportation Land (Conditional) Moderately interrupted Cancellation of classes.
SDRRM Team is activated with few

Response Capabilities Functional response groups from local and private 100% response were activated
clusters.
The SDRRMC of TIS will have to prepare for the worst-case scenarios as described in the above table. In this case, heavy
flooding shall affect the school community, possibly destroying some structures and buildings. Other functions within the school
could also be paralyzed. Moreover, in case in-community evacuation is needed, several evacuation areas are available all around
the Barangay. It is also noteworthy that areas of Sitio Hilltop can be sites for future evacuation centers because it has the highest
elevation near the school.

Table 7: CP Form 3B: Scenario Generation for Human-Induced Hazard
PARTICULARS
BAD WORSE WORST
(CAN BE CUSTOMIZED)
Flood arises resulting to the ff:
 Uneasy access to some parts
of the school.
Water rises around the school  Caused health problems like
General Description of Event Continuous rain.
premises due to due to heavy rain. leptospirosis and other skin
diseases.
 Affects the pupil’s attendance.
Damaged of the school properties.
No. of Affected Learners (Male, Female, IP,

190 381 762
Muslim, PWD)
No. of Dead Learners (Male, Female, IP,
19 38 57
Muslim, PWD)
No. of Injured Learners (Male, Female, IP,
38 57 190
Muslim, PWD)
No. of Missing Learners (Male, Female, IP,
19 38 57
Muslim, PWD)
No. of Affected Personnel (Male, Female,) 10 21 38
No. of Dead Personnel (Male, Female) 2 10 19

No. of Injured Personnel (Male, Female) 10 21 38

No. of Missing Personnel (Male, Female) 2 10 19
No. of Affected Non-Teaching Personnel (Male,
2 3 5
Female)
No. of Dead Non-Teaching Personnel (Male,
1 2 3
Female)
No. of Injured Non-Teaching Personnel (Male,
2 3 5
Female)
No. of Missing Non-Teaching Personnel (Male,
1 2 3
Female)
EFFECTS
Damaged other infrastructures and
Partially damaged CLs Totally damaged CLs
Infrastructure ancillary facilities (e.g., laboratories,
clinic, library)
Damaged technical-
Damaged learning resources
vocational supplies and Total furniture and fixtures
Non-infrastructure and self-learning modules
equipment
Communication Weak internet connection No internet Connection All Communication is down

Power/ Electricity Power brownout for 2 hours Power brownout for 1 day Power blackout for 1 week
Transportation Land (Conditional) Moderately interrupted Cancellation of classes.
SDRRM Team is activated with few

Response Capabilities Functional response groups from local and private 100% response were activated
clusters.
Table 8: CP Form 4A.1: Affected Learners
DISPLACED LEARNERS
NO. OF LEARNERS
AREA/ LOCATION REASONS FOR
AFFECTED NO. OF LEARNERS INSIDE EVACUATION CENTERS
DISPLACEMENT
213 95 Due to flood, communities near
the school led to the displacement
Aplaya (Proper) of the affected learners
Ambulong 194 0
Libjo 13 0
Dao 242 0

Pinamukan Silangan 9 0
Pinamukan Proper 21 0
San isidro 22 0
Simlong 13 0
Haligue Silangan 3 0
Mabacong 5 0
Malibayo 9 0
TOTAL 834 0

Table 9: CP Form 4A.2: Affected Personnel
DISPLACED TEACHING PERSONNEL NO. OF NON- DISPLACED NON-TEACHING PERSONNEL

NO. OF NO. OF TEACHING NO. OF NON-
NO. OF NO. OF NON-
TEACHING TEACHING PERSONNEL TEACHING
AREA/ TEACHING TEACHING
PERSONNEL PERSONNEL REASONS FOR AFFECTED PERSONNEL REASONS FOR
LOCATION PERSONNEL OUTSIDE
INSIDE OUTSIDE DISPLACEMENT INSIDE DISPLACEMENT
AFFECTED EVACUATION
EVACUATION EVACUATION EVACUATION
CENTERS
CENTERS CENTERS CENTERS
Tabangao 42 4 38 Ensure safety 5 1 4 Due to flood,
Integrated School communities near
the school led to
the displacement
of the affected s
Based on the information provided is a structured overview of the situation regarding the teaching and non-teaching
personnel affected by the evacuation. This breakdown aims to clarify the extent of the impact on both teaching and non-teaching
staff due o he evacuation, emphasizing the importance of safety and support during such crises.

Table 10: CP Form 4B.1: Breakdown of Affected Learners
BREAKDOWN
(FILL-UP ONLY WHEN APPROPRIATE)
AREA/ LOCATION , IP LEARNERS LEARNERS MUSLIM ALS OTHERS
K- G6 G7-G10 SHS WITH LEARNERS LEARNERS
DISABILITY
M F M F M F M F M F M F M F M F
Aplaya (Proper) 121 92 0 0 94 71 27 21 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ambulong 108 80 0 0 86 65 28 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Libjo 12 7 0 0 5 1 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Dao 124 115 0 0 95 101 29 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pinamukan Silangan 4 5 0 0 0 5 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pinamukan Proper 10 2 0 ;0 0 2 10 9 0 ;0 0 ;0 0 ;0 0 ;0
San isidro 10 12 0 ;0 7 12 3 0 0 ;0 0 ;0 0 ;0 0 ;0
Simlong 66 ;0 0 ;0 4 4 62 37 0 ;0 0 ;0 0 ;0 0 ;0

Haligue Silangan 3 0 0 ;0 0 0 3 0 0 ;0 0 ;0 0 ;0 0 ;0
Mabacong 5 0 0 ;0 0 0 5 0 0 ;0 0 ;0 0 ;0 0 ;0
Malibayo 5 0 0 ;0 0 0 5 0 0 ;0 0 ;0 0 ;0 0 ;0
TOTAL 477 357 0 ;0 294 261 183 96 0 ;0 0 ;0 0 ;0 0 ;0
Based on the information provided is a structured overview of the situation regarding the Learners affected by the
evacuation. This breakdown aims to clarify the extent of the impact on learners due to the evacuation, emphasizing the importance
of safety and support during such crises.

Table 10: CP Form 4B.2: Breakdown of Affected Personnel
NO. OF TEACHING PERSONNEL NO. OF NON-TEACHING PERSONNEL

AREA/ LOCATION AFFECTED AFFECTED
OTHERS
M F M F
Tabangao Integrated School 4 38 0 5 N/A
This organized presentation includes a breakdown by gender and location aiding in understanding he demographic impact of
the evacuation on educational personnel.

CHAPTER II. GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
A. Goals
The goal of the Contingency Plan is to develop a comprehensive flood
preparedness and response plan for Tabangao Integrated School that prioritizes the
protection of lives and property, ensures the identification and fulfillment of
immediate needs, and fosters strong coordination and collaboration with
stakeholders for effective action during flood
B. General Objective(s)
The general objectives of the contingency plan are as follows:
1. To safeguard human life and minimize property and environmental damage
from disaster
2. To establish measures and actions to avert or minimize loss of lives and
property through:
a. planning
b. organizing
c. training
d. equipping
e. hazard mapping
f. and efficient dissemination of public information

3. To organize concerted actions of the community members to provide the
following to victims
a. Emergency assistance
i. evacuation
ii. search
iii. rescue
b. Emergency relief
4. To compose measures to facilitate the return to normalcy by off-site record
keeping, restoring or improving damaged equipment and infrastructure.
C. Scope and Limitations:
The scope of methodology employed in the formulation of the Contingency
Plan for flood of Tabangao Integrated School included:
1. Contingency Plan formulation has followed the most recent guidelines of
the Office of the City DRRM Council (CDRRMC) on contingency planning.
2. Flood hazard map and all other maps included in the current document are
generated using Geographic Information System (GIS) and made use of
government data on hazards (e.g., flood map from Mines and Geosciences
Bureau and the DOST-Project NOAH)
3. Sufficient consultations and workshop activities with Brgy. Council

representatives and BDRRM Officer.
This CP for flood, however, has several limitations assumptions were made in
filling up some of the CP Forms due to lack or absence of updated data.

CHAPTER III. RESPONSE ARRANGEMENTS
A. Response Clusters
The following are the required clusters, with the corresponding lead and member
offices, that must be activated in response to the typhoon: Coordinating response to
any disaster calls for the identification of both internal and external Barangay clusters
to pinpoint the lead committee and outline their corresponding roles and tasks. In
Barangay Tabangao, the following are the identified Ad hoc and Technical
Working Group Clusters:
1. Food and Non-food Items
2. HEALTH (WASH, Health, Nutrition and Psychological Services) Cluster
3. Protection
4. Camp Coordination and Management Cluster
5. Logistics
6. Emergency Communications Cluster
7. Education Cluster
8. Search and Rescue
9. Dead and Missing Cluster
10. Law and Order
11. Humanitarian Assistance Cluster

Response Activities
Table 12: CP Form 6: Response Activities

,
TIMEFRAME
RESPONSE ACTIVITIES RESPONSIBLE TEAM/COMMITTEE
(after the trigger)
0-24 hours ● Check yourself and others. Facilities Assessment Team
● Check water, gas and electric lines for damage.
● Turn on the radio/cellphone.
● Stay out of damaged buildings.
● Secure the damaged area
● Search and Rescue

24-48 hours ● Expect the FLOOD. Information and Communication Team
Transportation/Mobilization Team
● Expect continuous collapse of building
● Turn on the radios.
● Stay away from falling debris
● Retrieval Operation

TIMEFRAME
(after the trigger)

72 hours ● Survey the scene Safety and Security Team
● Damage assessment
96 hours ● Clearance of the affected area Psychosocial Team
Medical Team/Health Team
● Conduct Psychological First Aid
5-10 days ● Conduct of information gathering and analysis of the flood Currriculum Monitoring/Assessment Team
and maintenance of records
● Assessment/Re-assessment of emergency disaster efforts
capabilities and submission of reports
● Re-planning to effectiveness based on experience and other
factors.

TIMEFRAME
(after the trigger)

0-24 hours ● Check yourself and others. Search and Rescue team
● Check water, gas and electric lines for damages.
● Secure the damage area

Resource Inventory
Table 13: CP Form 7: Resource Inventory
TEAM/COMMITTEE RESOURCE QUANTITY REMARKS

Information and Communication devices For reliable communication during
10
Communication Team (radios) events
Laptops 5 For report preparation and data entry
Printer 1 For printing materials and reports
Projector 1 For presentations during meetings
Curriculum Assessment materials
200 For regular curriculum evaluations
Monitoring/Assessment Team (tests)
Data analysis software 1 For data processing
Inspection tools
Facilities Assessment Team N/A For assessing facilities
(measuring tape, levels)
Safety gear 10 sets For use during facility inspections
Pre-Disaster Monitoring
Weather monitoring tools 5 For tracking potential disasters
Team
Emergency contact list 1 Ensure it is up to date

Transportation/Mobilization
Vehicles 5 For transporting personnel/supplies
Team
Fuel 100 gallons For vehicles
Maps/GPS devices 5 For navigation
Safety equipment (first aid
Safety and Security Team 10 For emergencies
kits)
Flashlights 10 For visibility in emergency situations
Contain basic supplies for
Emergency kits 10
emergencies
Search and Rescue Team Search and rescue tools N/A Such as ropes, harnesses, etc.
Communication devices For coordination during search
10
(radios) operations
Logistics/Relief Assistance
Food and water supplies 500 units Non-perishable items for relief efforts
Committee
Blankets 200 For distribution during disasters
Shelter materials N/A Tarpaulins, tents
Medical Supply/Health Team First aid kits 15 For medical emergencies
Medical supplies
(bandages, antiseptics, N/A For general health care
etc.)
Personal protective 20 sets For health and safety of responders

equipment
Prescription medications Varies For distribution where applicable
Psychosocial Processing Counseling materials
100 For dissemination
Team (brochures, guides)
Activity materials (games,
N/A For engagement during sessions
art supplies)
Trained counselors 5 For providing direct support
Training materials for staff N/A For training on psychosocial support
Curriculum Rehab/Recovery Educational resources
200 For use in recovery programs
Team (books, materials)
Training programs for Focused on recovery and trauma-
N/A
teachers informed practices
Technology tools
10 For facilitating learning
(tablets/laptops)
Support materials for
N/A For providing guidance to caregivers
families
This structured resource inventory not only prepares each team for immediate response but also fosters collaboration,
ensuring that the community is well-equipped to handle emergencies and support recovery efforts effectively. Regular audits and

updates to the inventory will maintain readiness and responsiveness as new challenges arise, highlighting the importance of
preparedness in safeguarding community well-being.
Resource Projection
Table 14: CP Form 8: Resource Projection
Projected Needs
No. of (e.g. training needs)
Capacity Possible sources of funding
staff/per Write N/A if not needed
Human Resources (certifications, (MOOE, SEF, Local DRRM Timeline
sons No. of staff
skills, etc.) Fund, Partners, etc)
available needing Cost for Training
training
Internal
(e.g. GCs, Teachers, Staff,
etc.) DRRM training 10 8 450/pax MOOE,Partners,Local DRRM fund June to March
External Resources City Disaster Risk
(e.g. Partners, PNP, BFA Reduction
etc.) Management 12 27 450/pax Local Fund,canteen fund June to March
Philippine Red Cross
– Batangas Chapter 10 27 450/pax MOA June to March
Equipment
Equipment/Supplies Condition Units Projected Needs Possible sources of funding Timeline
(e.g. fire extinguishers, body (e.g. fully functional, available (MOOE, SEF, Local DRRM Fund,
board, siren, comms radio) nearing expiry, etc.) Partners, etc)
Units Needed Unit Cost
Fire Extinguisher Functional 14 8 3000 MOOE June to March

Megaphone Functional 2 1 3000 MOOE June to March

Spine Board Available 1 2 2250 MOOE June to March
Key Areas for Measures to strengthen capacities or address

Details Capacities Gaps/Vulnerabilities Timeline
Preparedness gaps/vulnerabilities
Risk Understanding 1. Understanding of Hazards and its

Know the different hazards in the Integrate all DRRM concern in the SIP for funding to
characteristics Materials and Supplies for the identified hazard
community. MOOE.
June to March
2. Conduct of Risk Assessment Hazard mapping
3. Planning and undertaking actions based
on risk assessment results Immediate action to hazard prone area
Contingency Plan and 1. Contingency Plan Updated contingency plan Every 6 months
Dissemination 2. IEC Updated contingency plan
Communication 1. Understanding of advisory including

warning signals
Updated applications for the weather Information of Teachers Disseminate the applications to SDRRM coordinator
June to March
2. Understanding and implementation of DO
21 s.2015
Some members of the faculty are not aware and
Understand the guidelines of DO 21 s2015 SLAC Session
familiar on DO 21
June to March
3. Equipment Limited equipment for DRRM in the school June to March

Coordination 1. Division Office Implementation of the programs and projects

Request letter and proposal for the activity
(funding) June to March
2. P/M/CDRRMC
Properly coordinated the programs and June to March
3. LGUs projects of the school to the local
June to March
government and for the partners
4. Partners
June to March
5. DepEd CO
June to March
Monitoring 1. Monitoring of
preparedness/contingency
80% of the school contingency plan were Monitoring to 20% of the schools to update their
plan of school 100% of the school contingency plan were updated
updated contingency plan
June to March
2. Monitoring of hazard
situation, including communicating with
school officials, strict/division office and LGU Hazards situation were properly monitored
Emergency supplies and equipment Need to purchase DRRM equipment
and coordinated
June to March
3. Monitoring RADaR
completion, validation and
submission to Central Send RADaR report after calamities Signals and proper format of the radar School to school DRRM awareness campaign
Office
June to March
4. Monitoring of
implementation of support
for learning continuity June to March
5. Tracking of Learners and personnel
Tracking of learners and personnel were
Contact number of pupils and school personnel Database system for the contacts of all concern
properly monitored
June to March
6. Transportation Transportation for monitoring is enough to
Monitor early to avoid traffic
implement the programs and projects
June to March

Convergence 1. Interface among offices within the school

Collaboration and discussion to other office
Attitude Explain the proper handling of disaster
were evident.
June to March
2. Existence of SDRRM Team Commitment of the member of the committee need to
Commitment
address to top management June to March
3. Command System DRRM team and School Watching Team
were evident
4. Twinning with other schools
Support for Learning 1. Implement and monitor Temporary

Continuity Learning Spaces
2. Buffer stocks for learning materials

3. Alternative Delivery Modes
4. Psychosocial Support
SDRRM Coordinator and Clinic
Commitment of the member of the committee need to
Teacher are aware and had Commitment Year Round
address to top management
background on this matter.
5. Emergency School Feeding

6. Learner's Kits The Learners are taught about the
information about disaster. June to March
7. Teacher's Kits Teachers were provided with First Aid kit June to March
8. Hygiene kits
Each classroom is equipped with hygiene kit.
June to March
9. Provision of Water Sanitation and Hygiene
services
There is a yearly check-up for the water
supply and its safety.
June to March

10. Updated disaggregated data on learners

and master list of students in school and Coordination to planning section for the
alternative learning schools Internet and system
updates of the learners.
June to March
11. Clean up drives
Coordinate early the attendees of the clean drive for
Clean drive partnership to Barangay Council Transportation
transportation
June to March
12. Sign memorandum of agreement (MOA)
with private enterprises for emergency
purchase
Support for Schools 1. Sign memorandum of agreement (MOA)

used as Evacuation between LGU and school on the use of
Centers schools as evacuation center including the
roles and responsibilities of both institutions;
2. Repair, maintenance and replacement of

schools identified as evacuation center by
the LGU
3. Resumption Strategies including

assessment of readiness of the schools
4. Establish functional referral pathways to
respond to child protection concerns using
the existing PNP and DSWD operational
guidelines
5. Feedback mechanism to report gaps in

the delivery of services, grievances and
other needs to improve education
interventions

6. Twinning of schools for teacher-volunteers

for deployment in the affected schools that Participation of school personnel, pupils and Active participation of the school personnel and the
need additional volunteers Quarterly drills were conducted
external stakeholders community must be address during evaluation
June to March
10. LGUs preposition additional Temporary
Learning Spaces (TLS)
Drills 1. Regular conduct of drills

Conduct Drills (quarterly) Attitude Discuss to the pupils and PTA the purpose of drills
June to March
2. Existence of protocols – command
system, evacuation route, safe place, family
reunification
3. Coordination with and participation of
parents, relevant agencies and partners
during drills
Fund Sources NGOs’ LGU’s MOOE fund

B. Emergency Operations Center
Table 15: CP Form 10: Emergency Operations Center

LOCATION Tabangao Integrated School
CONTACT INFORMATION
Primary Alternate
Landline: 043) 702-2094 Satellite Phone: None
Mobile: 09391934031 Radio Frequency: None
Email Address: [email protected] Others: N/A
Social media:
https://www.facebook.com/DepEdTayoTIS301481
Others: N/A
EOC MANAGEMENT TEAM
POSITION NAMES AND AGENCY/ CONTACT INFORMATION
(CUSTOMIZE AS APPROPRIATE) OFFICE/ ORGANIZATION (PRIMARY AND ALTERNATE)
(PRIMARY AND ALTERNATE)
Lorna L. Catilo 09391934031
EOC Manager
Rosemarie Z. Malibiran
Rommel A. Rosales
Operations Coordinator
Babylyn A. Formarejo
Elamay B. Pagsinohin
Planning Coordinator
Anabelle Aguado
Mary Jane F. Magnaye
Logistics/Rescue Coordinator
Mabel Sarmiento
Vanessa Blanca D. Balugo
Finance/ Admin Coordinator
Mary Claire
Monitoring team Vincent M. Dela Roca
Nepomuceno A. Caaway
VINCENT M. DELA ROCA
MONIIORING COORDINAOR
Non-Activation
In case of flooding the responsible clusters will lead the implementation of the
contingency plan following the activation guide below:
Figure 3: CP Activation Flow Chart for Flood
START
PAGASA
forecasts
Flood
DRRMC
conducts
PDRA
Typhoon makes
landfall. DRRMC
conducts RDANA
1
2
EOC on red alert Yes Activate No

contingency EOC on blue
status alert status
plan?
RO convenes the Responders

clusters at the conduct normal
EOC 3
operations using
ICS
RO mobilizes and
deploys IMT Clusters provide
continuous support
to responders
Clusters and IMT
operate based on
contingency plan
No
Situation
normalize 3
No d?
Situation
1 Yes
improved?
IC recommends
Yes demobilization
IMT recommends
deactivation of RO approves recommendation
contingency plan for demobilization
RO directs deactivation Responders and clusters demobilize.

of contingency plan Clusters for early recovery operate.
2 EOC returns to white

status END
Figure 4: Sample CP Activation Flor Chart for Planned Event
START
DRRMC activates
contingency plan
EOC on red alert

status
RO convenes the
clusters at EOC
Figure 5: General Workflow for the activation and deactivation of Contingency Plan
RO mobilizes and
deploys IMT
Convene all Coordinate

Clusters and IMT
Activation of representatives
operate based on preparations and
Contingency Plan of appropriate
contingency plan all necessary
clusters activities
No
Planned
event
ended?
Yes
IMT recommends
Non-Activation deactivation of
contingency plan
This Contingency Plan will only be activated upon the recommendations of the team
RO directs deactivation of
using the following decision points: contingency plan
IMT, responders and

clusters demobilize
• No. of Affected Areas (AOR)
OpCen on white alert
• Directive from the Responsible Personstatus
• Situation Reports
END
Unless the findings specify otherwise, the Contingency Plan will not be activated. In
the case of non – activation, the plan will be maintained as a perpetual plan for future
use in the event of upcoming incidents in school.

ANNEXES
Working Group
Purpose:
The Working Group shall oversee the refinement, finalization, testing,
evaluation, packaging, updating an improvement of the contingency plan
under the supervision of the CDRRM focal person.
1. Facilitate the refinement and finalization of the contingency plan to
include testing, evaluation, packaging, updating and improvement.
2. Develop work plan for the completion and updating of the
contingency plan.
3. Organize consultation meetings with the planners and relevant
technical experts regarding the development of the contingency plan; and
4. Facilitate the presentation and endorsement of the contingency plan
to the authorities for comments and approval.
a. Head:
Overall, in charge of coordinating the entire CP
process; monitors the progress of the contingency plan;
initiates the conduct of meetings to review, evaluate and
update the contingency plan, as necessary; disseminates
updates on the contingency plan to agencies/offices
concerned; leads the conduct of simulation exercises to
test the coherence and integrity of the plan.

b. Facilitator
Facilitate meetings on contingency planning, workshops,
and simulation exercises; drives the contingency planning
participants to achieve the target outputs.
c. Secretariat:
Documents and assimilate comments, inputs and recom-
menddations gathered during meetings,
workshops, and exercises into the contingency plan; consolidate
the outputs from the clusters and integrates them into the
contingency plan; provides other secretariat services.
d. Cluster Representative(s):
Facilitates the completion of detailed implementation
plans for the respective cluster, including the accomplishment of
the CP forms; ensures the availability of data for the specific
cluster.
Coordinates with other clusters to ensure that the preparation of
sub-plans is on track, that the different cluster plans are
consistent with each other, and that all clusters are familiarized
with their tasks likely to be performed in case of an emergency.
i. Work plan:
his should cover the detailed activities and
timelines for completing, testing, evaluating,

packaging, updating, and improving the
contingency plan.
ii. Proceedings of the meetings, workshops, and
simulation exercises:
his pertains to the chronological
documentation of the proceedings and discussions
during meetings, workshops and simulation
exercises and other related activities.
EFFECTIVITY
This contingency plan for 2024 - 2027 shall be effective and upon
publication. The plan shall be considered a “working document “and be
subjected to continuous review and enhancement by the DepEd Technical
Working Group based on latest scientific studies about geological hazards,
risk assessment findings and innovations in DRRM policies and standards.
Prepared by:
LORNA L. CATILO
SDRRM Coordinator
Checked by:
ANNALYN D. EBORA, EdD

Principal II
Conformed:
School Emergency Operation Center Committee
ROMMEL ROSALES VANESSA BLANCA D. BALUGO

Operations Coordinator Administrative Coordinator
Lead Committee Member (Chair) Alternate Lead
ETHEL V. DINGLASAN ANABELLE AGUADO

Prefect of Discipline SSG Adviser
Internal Members Internal Members
NEPOMUCENO A. CAAWAY Jr. VINCENT M. DELA ROCA

Barangay Captain Barangay Councilor
External Members External Members

FLOOD

Uploaded by

Document Informationclick to expand document information

Document Informationclick to expand document information

Copyright:

Available Formats

FLOOD

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

FLOOD

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Republic of the Philippines

The contingency plan Tabangao Integrated School was crafted through a

collaborative effort of internal and external stakeholders directly and indirectly

teaching staff of Tabangao Integrated School. In to share human material resources

of 2010 or RA 10121) which stated as “a management process that analyzes specific

potential events or emerging situations that might threaten society or the

environment and establishes arrangements in advance to enable timely, effective

Reduction Management (SDRRM) became the immediate responsive team in times

of disaster. The success of this contingency plan is primarily hinged on collective

efforts and effective involvement of SDRRM Team

TABANGAO INTEGRATED SCHOOL

Tabangao Integrated School is an institution aimed for scholarly uplifting the

with partly urban areas with remaining rural areas.

Table 1: Distribution of Students Population according to sex at birth

SEX AT BIRTH POPULATION PERCENTAGE

Table 2: Distribution of Population of Teaching Staff according to sex at birth

SEX AT BIRTH POPULATION PERCENTAGE

Table 3: Distribution of Population of Non-Teaching Staff according to sex at birth

SEX AT BIRTH POPULATION PERCENTAGE

TABANGAO INTEGRATED SCHOOL

TABANGAO INTEGRATED SCHOOL

Figure 2: Ground Level Evacuation Plan of Tabangao

TABANGAO INTEGRATED SCHOOL

TABANGAO INTEGRATED SCHOOL

HAZARD PROBABILITY IMPACT AVERAGE RANK

Chemical 3 Past experiences on chemical hazards 3 Communities near Malampaya/ Shell 3 7

TABANGAO INTEGRATED SCHOOL

shortly followed by typhoon and earthquake with an average score of 4 followed by a

least with an average score of 2.5 respectively.

C. Hazard to Plan for Rain Induced Flooding

Based on the assessment of the hazards, Tabangao IS requires having

effective disaster preparedness and response in the barangay. This planning

process requires, however, a clear understanding of how a hazard occurs, or

typhoon in this case, to anticipate the causes and damages.

TABANGAO INTEGRATED SCHOOL

The anatomy of rain-induced flooding is shown below:

Table 5: CP Form 2: Anatomy of Rain – Induced Flooding

TABANGAO INTEGRATED SCHOOL

clogged drainages during heavy rainfalls. The geographical location of Tabangao IS

cockroaches starting to come out of the drainages. Nevertheless, in terms of

mitigation, strong implementation of the environment code is being implemented by

announcement system are also in place. In terms of preparedness, numerous

TABANGAO INTEGRATED SCHOOL

No. of Affected Learners (Male, Female, IP,

TABANGAO INTEGRATED SCHOOL

No. of Missing Learners (Male, Female, IP,

TABANGAO INTEGRATED SCHOOL

No. of Missing Non-Teaching Personnel (Male,

Communication Weak internet connection No internet Connection All Communication is down

TABANGAO INTEGRATED SCHOOL

Transportation Land (Conditional) Moderately interrupted Cancellation of classes.

SDRRM Team is activated with few

TABANGAO INTEGRATED SCHOOL

Table 7: CP Form 3B: Scenario Generation for Human-Induced Hazard

No. of Affected Learners (Male, Female, IP,

TABANGAO INTEGRATED SCHOOL

No. of Injured Personnel (Male, Female) 10 21 38

Communication Weak internet connection No internet Connection All Communication is down