Size Reduction
Size Reduction
SIZE REDUCTION
Compiled by: Engr. Albert D.C. Evangelista
Size Reduction, also known as comminution, is applied to all ways in which particles of solids
are cut or broken into smaller pieces.
Energy Laws
There are empirical laws to estimate the amount of energy needed for size reduction:
(1) Von Rittinger’s Law
(2) Kick’s Law
(3) Bond’s Law
General Equation:
− C dx
𝑑E =
Xn
Where:
E = work done to reduce a unit mass of feed
X = particle size or diameter
C & n = constants depending upon type and size of material and type of machine
dx
dE = −C X2
1 1
𝐸 = −𝐶 [𝑋 − 𝑋 ]
1 2
Let:
E = P/m where P = Total power required; m = Total mass of feed
KR = C = Rittinger’s Law Constant
D𝐹 = X1 = Diameter of the feed
Dp = X2 = Mean Diameter of the product
Therefore:
P 1 1
= KR [ − ]
m Dp DF
Note:
– Rittinger’s Law constant designates the new surface produced per unit of mechanical energy
absorbed by the material being crushed.
– The values vary for different materials, depending on the elastic constants and their relation
to the ultimate strength and on the manner or rate of application of the crushing force.
– It was determined by drop weight crusher based on maximum effectiveness of size reduction.
– A few values of Rittinger’s number as determined by a drop weight crusher are given in table
9 page 42 of Unit Operations by Brown.
dx
dE = −C X
X
E = −C ln X2
1
Let:
E = P/m where P = Total power required; m = Total mass of feed
𝐾𝐾 = C = Kick’s Law Constant
D𝐹 = X1 = Diameter (mean) of the feed
Dp = X 2 = Mean Diameter of the product
Therefore:
P DF
= K K ln
m D𝑃
dx
dE = −C X1.5
1 1
𝐸 = −2𝐶 [𝑋 0.5 −𝑋 0.5 ]
1 2
Let:
E = P/m where P = Total power required; m = Total mass of feed
𝐾𝐵 = 2C = Bonds’s Law Constant
D𝐹 = X1 = Diameter (mean) of the feed
Dp = X2 = Mean Diameter of the product
Therefore:
P 1 1
= KB [ − ]
m √Dp √DF
To use the above equation, Bond proposed a work index Wi as the work in kW-h/ ton
required to reduce a unit weight from a very large size to 80% passing a 100 - µm screen.
The work E is the gross work required to reduce a unit weight of feed with 80% passing a
diameter DF µm to a product with 80% passing Dp µm. Bond’s final equation in terms of
more familiar units is
P 1 1
= 1.46Wi [ − ]
m √Dp √DF
Or
P 1 1
= 0.3162Wi [ − ]
m √Dp √DF
Energy utilization
Energy fed into a crusher was utilized as follows:
(1) In producing elastic deformation of the particles before fracture occurs.
(2) In producing inelastic deformation which results in size reduction.
(3) In causing elastic distortion of the equipment.
(4) In friction between particles, and between particles and the machine.
(5) In noise, heat and vibration in the plant, and
(6) In friction losses in the plant itself.
For a given energy input, the new surface produced was independent of:
(1) The velocity of impact,
(2) The mass and arrangement of the sample,
(3) The initial particle size, and
(4) The moisture content of the sample.
(2) Impact at one solid surface (Fig. 20-20d), or between particles (Fig. 20-20e)
(3) By shear action of the surrounding medium (Fig. 20-20f, colloid mill)
(4) Nonmechanical introduction of energy (Thermal shock, explosive shattering,
electrohydraulic)
Practical Classification of Crushing and Grinding Equipment ChE HB 7th Ed: Table 20-6
Size*
Hardness
Size-reduction Range of feeds, Range of Reduction Types of
of
operation in.† products, in.† ratio‡ equipment
material
Max. Min. Max. Min.
Crushing:
Primary Hard 60 12 20 4 3 to 1 A to B
20 4 5 1 4 to 1
Secondary Hard 5 1 1 0.2 5 to 1 A to E
1.5 0.25 0.185 0.033 7 to 1
(4) (20)
Soft 60 4 2 0.4 10 to 1 C to G
Grinding:
Pulverizing:
Coarse Hard 0.185 0.033 0.023 0.003 10 to 1 D to I
(4) (20) (28) (200)
Fine Hard 0.046 0.0058 0.003 0.00039 15 to 1 H to K
(14) (100) (200) (1250)
Disintegration:
Coarse Soft 0.5 0.065 0.023 0.003 20 to 1 F, I
Fine Soft 0.156 0.0195 0.003 0.00039 50 to 1 I to K
(5) (32) (200) (1250)
*85% by weight smaller than the size given.
†Sieve number in parentheses, mesh per inch
‡Higher reduction ratios for closed-circuit operations.
NOTE: To convert inches to millimeters, multiply by 25.4.
I
Feed Reject
Crusher
Product
Reject
Feed
Crusher
Product
– Typical closed circuit grinding process, in which a coarse crusher, an intermediate crusher
and a fine grinder are used.
Grinding may be carried out either wet or dry, although wet grinding is generally applicable only
with low-speed mills. The advantages of wet grinding are:
– The power consumption is reduced by about 20–30 per cent.
– The capacity of the plant is increased.
– The removal of the product is facilitated and the amount of fines is reduced.
– Dust formation is eliminated.
– The solids are more easily handled.
(2) Structure. Normal granular materials such as coal, ores and rocks can be effectively crushed
employing the normal forces of compression, impact, and so on. With fibrous materials a
tearing action is required.
(3) Moisture content. It is found that materials do not flow well if they contain between about 5
and 50 per cent of moisture. Under these conditions the material tends to cake together in the
form of balls. In general, grinding can be carried out satisfactorily outside these limits.
(4) Crushing strength. The power required for crushing is almost directly proportional to the
crushing strength of the material.
(5) Friability. The friability of the material is its tendency to fracture during normal handling. In
general, a crystalline material will break along well-defined planes and the power required for
crushing will increase as the particle size is reduced.
(6) Stickiness. A sticky material will tend to clog the grinding equipment and it should therefore
be ground in a plant that can be cleaned easily.
(7) Soapiness. In general, this is a measure of the coefficient of friction of the surface of the
material. If the coefficient of friction is low, the crushing may be more difficult.
(8) Explosive materials must be ground wet or in the presence of an inert atmosphere.
(9) Materials yielding dusts that are harmful to the health must be ground under conditions
where the dust is not allowed to escape.
Taggart’s Formula
– Used to estimate the capacity of Jaw & Gyratory Crushers with gapes of 4 inches to 2 feet.
T = 0.6LS
Note:
– The power requirement for jaw and gyratory crushers are about the same, but the gyratory
load is somewhat more uniform since it is crushing continuously whereas the jaw crusher
works intermittently.
– If the capacity requirements are small enough so that one jaw crusher is adequate, the jaw
crusher is the usual choice.
– If the capacity requirements are large enough to keep a gyratory in continuous operation,
the gyratory is usually preferred.
– Taggart states an empirical rule that “if the hourly tonnage to be crushed divided by the
square of the gape in inches is less than 0.115, use a jaw crusher; otherwise, a gyratory.”
– The machine is protected, by spring loading, against damage from very hard material.
– Both rolls may be driven, or one directly and the other by friction with the solids.
– The crushing rolls, which may vary from a few centimeters up to about 1.2 m in diameter,
are suitable for effecting a small size reduction ratio, 4: 1 in a single operation.
– The capacity is usually between one-tenth and one-third of that calculated on the assumption
that a continuous ribbon of the material forms between the rolls.
(𝑟1 + 𝑏)
𝑐𝑜𝑠𝛼 =
(𝑟2 + 𝑟1 )
– For steel rolls, the angle of nip is not greater than about 32◦.
– The theoretical capacity of roll crushers using Coulson’s equation is given by:
– The theoretical capacity of roll crushers using Brown’s equation is given by:
60𝜐𝐿𝐷𝑃 𝜌
𝑇=
2000
Where:
T = capacity in tons/hr
υ = peripheral velocity (fpm). For rolls up to 72 inches in diameter, υ is usually
approximately equal to 300 + 84Dr
Dr = diameter of roll
L = width of rolls (ft)
DP = distance between rolls (ft)
ρ = density of materials (lb/ft3)
𝑑𝐿𝑠
𝑄=
2.96
𝑟ώ2𝐶 = 𝑔
𝑔
ώ𝐶 = √
𝑟
Where: r = the radius of the mill less that of the particle; g = acceleration due to gravity
– The corresponding critical rotational speed, Nc in revolutions per unit time, is given by:
ώ𝐶 1 𝑔
𝑁𝐶 = = √
2𝜋 2𝜋 𝑟
– It is found that the optimum speed is between one-half and three-quarters of the critical
speed.