Chapter 2 RE Policy Analysis
Chapter 2 RE Policy Analysis
Over the past decade, India has made remarkable strides in transitioning toward
renewable energy (RE) as part of its broader efforts to combat climate change and promote
sustainable development. This chapter provides a detailed analysis of the major renewable
energy policies introduced between 2014 and 2024, focusing on their objectives,
implementation, and impact on the Indian power sector. By examining the evolution of key
policies such as the National Solar Mission, Renewable Purchase Obligations (RPOs), Solar
Park Policy, Ujwal DISCOM Assurance Yojana (UDAY), National Wind-Solar Hybrid Policy, and
the Electricity (Amendment) Bills, we will understand how these policies have shaped India’s
RE landscape.
Despite these challenges, the NSM laid a robust foundation for India’s solar sector,
contributing to its global leadership position in renewable energy.
Despite these challenges, the RPO policy remains a crucial part of India’s renewable energy
strategy, contributing to the sustained growth of the sector.
The Ministry of New and Renewable Energy (MNRE) set an ambitious target of establishing
40 GW of solar parks by 2022, with individual parks ranging from 500 MW to 1,000 MW.
2.3.2 Policy Mechanisms:
i. Viability Gap Funding (VGF): To attract investment in solar parks, the government
provided VGF to cover part of the project costs.
ii. Centralized Land Acquisition: The policy streamlined the land acquisition process by
designating specific areas for solar parks, reducing the burden on individual
developers.
iii. Transmission Infrastructure: The government ensured that transmission
infrastructure was built in parallel with solar park development, facilitating smooth
power evacuation.
Overall, the Solar Park Policy was instrumental in scaling up solar power generation in India,
contributing significantly to the country’s renewable energy targets.
2.4 Ujwal DISCOM Assurance Yojana (UDAY): Addressing Financial Distress in the Power
Sector
2.4.1 Background and Objectives
The financial health of India’s discoms has been a persistent challenge, with many
discoms facing significant debt and operational inefficiencies. The Ujwal DISCOM Assurance
Yojana (UDAY), launched in 2015, aimed to address this issue by providing financial
restructuring for discoms and encouraging operational improvements.
2.5.2 Objectives
i. Optimal Utilization of Transmission Infrastructure: By combining wind and solar
resources, the policy aimed to use the same transmission infrastructure for both,
reducing congestion and optimizing grid integration.
ii. Enhance Capacity Utilization: Wind and solar resources complement each other;
wind tends to be stronger during the night and monsoon seasons, while solar is more
productive during the day. Combining both allows for a higher capacity utilization
factor (CUF).
iii. Reduce Costs: Hybrid plants can share common infrastructure like land, transmission
lines, and maintenance services, reducing overall costs for renewable energy
developers.
iv. Viability Gap Funding (VGF) Support: The policy also provided VGF for projects
facing financial constraints, making hybrid projects more financially viable.
Challenges include the need for significant upfront investment, as hybrid projects often
require more advanced technological solutions for integration, such as energy storage.
However, the potential to optimize land use and reduce transmission bottlenecks makes the
policy highly promising for India's renewable energy future.
Key amendments were proposed and implemented through the following bills:
i. Electricity (Amendment) Bill, 2014
ii. Electricity (Amendment) Bill, 2020
iii. Electricity (Amendment) Bill, 2022
i. The RGO provision ensured that even conventional energy producers had a vested
interest in investing in or procuring renewable energy, thus providing an indirect
boost to the renewable sector.
ii. By encouraging open access and the separation of content and carriage, the bill
opened up the possibility for renewable energy suppliers to sell directly to
consumers, bypassing inefficient discoms. This increased market access for
renewable energy generators.
However, implementation challenges arose due to the lack of infrastructure for open access
and the financial weakness of discoms, which limited the practical impact of these
provisions in the early years.
i. Direct Benefit Transfer (DBT) for Subsidies: The bill proposed that electricity
subsidies be transferred directly to consumers through the Direct Benefit Transfer
(DBT) mechanism, eliminating the current system where subsidies are managed by
discoms. This increased transparency and encouraged financial discipline within
discoms.
ii. Renewable Purchase Obligations (RPOs): The bill further strengthened the
enforcement of RPOs, making it mandatory for states to comply with national
renewable energy targets. Non-compliance by states or discoms would result in
penalties, with the revenue collected being used to fund renewable energy projects.
iii. Privatization of Distribution: The bill emphasized the privatization of power
distribution, particularly in states where discoms were financially weak. This
measure aimed at improving efficiency and reducing technical and commercial
(AT&C) losses.
iv. National Renewable Energy Policy: The bill reiterated the need for a National
Renewable Energy Policy, highlighting its importance in ensuring that India's
renewable energy goals were met efficiently.
While the bill introduced several progressive measures, the financial instability of discoms
remained a significant bottleneck for renewable energy integration, as many discoms
struggled to pay renewable energy producers on time.
2.6.5 Electricity (Amendment) Bill, 2022: Focus on Sustainability and Consumer Rights
The Electricity (Amendment) Bill, 2022 represented one of the most comprehensive
reform attempts in India's power sector, with a strong emphasis on promoting renewable
energy and ensuring consumer rights.
i. Green Energy Open Access: A significant provision in the bill was the
introduction of Green Energy Open Access, allowing consumers to purchase
renewable energy directly from generators or through the market. This provision
was specifically aimed at large consumers (with demand greater than 100 kW)
and was designed to facilitate the consumption of green energy by industries and
commercial establishments.
ii. Time-bound Approvals: The bill proposed setting up a Centralized Authority for
Timely Approval of renewable energy projects. This would streamline the
process of obtaining necessary clearances and reduce delays in project
development.
iii. National Electricity Policy and National Renewable Energy Policy: The bill
proposed revising the National Electricity Policy to better align with the
country's long-term renewable energy goals. The focus was on increasing the
share of renewable energy in the energy mix and ensuring grid stability with
higher penetration of variable renewable energy sources.
iv. Penalty for RPO Non-compliance: The bill included stringent penalties for non-
compliance with RPOs. Discoms and other obligated entities failing to meet their
renewable energy obligations were subject to penalties proportional to the
shortfall, providing stronger incentives for RPO compliance.
Renewable energy (RE) has been at the heart of global efforts to mitigate climate
change and transition towards a more sustainable energy future. Over the past decade,
from 2014 to 2024, countries around the world have enacted various policies aimed at
scaling renewable energy production and reducing dependency on fossil fuels. India, being
one of the largest energy markets globally, has also taken significant steps in transforming
its power sector, focusing on solar, wind, and other forms of renewable energy. This chapter
compares the evolution of India’s renewable energy policies with those of other major
players such as China, the United States, the European Union (EU), the United Kingdom
(UK), Germany, Norway, and global commitments under the Paris Agreement.
India’s renewable energy policy evolution reflects both its unique challenges and
opportunities, particularly regarding its large population, rapid industrialization, and urgent
need for energy security. By contrasting its policy initiatives with those of other nations, this
chapter will shed light on best practices, challenges, and the global context of renewable
energy development.
i. Feed-in Tariffs (FiTs) for solar and wind power that offered guaranteed prices for
renewable energy producers, encouraging rapid scale-up.
ii. Renewable Portfolio Standards (RPS), which set mandatory targets for the share of
renewable energy in the electricity mix.
iii. Heavy investments in manufacturing capacity, making China the largest producer of
solar photovoltaic (PV) panels and wind turbines globally.
i. While India has focused on distributed solar power (such as rooftop solar projects),
China has built gigantic solar and wind farms in remote areas, connected to the grid
through ultra-high voltage (UHV) transmission lines.
ii. China’s centralized policy model, where decisions are made quickly at the top, has
enabled faster scaling of renewable energy compared to India’s more decentralized,
state-led approach.
iii. China’s investment in energy storage technologies has been more aggressive,
helping it tackle intermittency issues more effectively than India.
2.7.2 United States: A Market-driven and State-led Approach
Policy Overview: The United States' renewable energy policy is characterized by a
market-driven approach, with significant variation across states. The federal
government’s role has been more limited, providing tax incentives and setting general
goals, while individual states have taken the lead in policy innovation. Key policies
include:
i. Investment Tax Credit (ITC): This federal tax incentive has been instrumental in
promoting solar and wind energy projects by reducing upfront costs.
ii. Renewable Portfolio Standards (RPS): Similar to India’s RPOs, RPS mandates that
utilities source a percentage of their electricity from renewable sources. States like
California, New York, and Texas have been pioneers in adopting strong RPS targets.
iii. Clean Power Plan (CPP): Though introduced by the Obama administration to limit
carbon emissions from power plants, its implementation was paused during
subsequent administrations.
i. While India has adopted a more top-down approach with national targets and
mandates, the U.S. system is decentralized, with states driving the most aggressive
renewable energy initiatives.
ii. The U.S. has been more successful in mobilizing private sector investment through
tax incentives like the ITC and Production Tax Credit (PTC), while India’s policy
framework has relied more on public sector interventions.
iii. Grid management is a major concern in both countries, but the U.S. has invested
more in grid modernization and energy storage, particularly in states with high
renewable penetration like California.
2.7.3 European Union: The World’s Most Comprehensive Renewable Energy Strategy
Policy Overview: The European Union (EU) has been at the forefront of global
renewable energy policy, driven by its commitment to combating climate change and
transitioning to a low-carbon economy. The EU’s policy framework includes:
i. 2030 Climate and Energy Framework: This sets binding targets for a 40% reduction
in greenhouse gas emissions (from 1990 levels), a 32% share of renewable energy,
and a 32.5% improvement in energy efficiency by 2030.
ii. Renewable Energy Directive (RED): This directive set binding targets for renewable
energy deployment across member states, with a focus on promoting decentralized
energy and cross-border cooperation.
iii. Emissions Trading System (ETS): The EU’s carbon market is one of the world’s
largest, putting a price on carbon emissions and incentivizing clean energy
investments.
i. The EU’s approach to renewable energy is more integrated and driven by its climate
goals, whereas India’s policies are focused on energy security and economic
development.
ii. The EU’s carbon pricing mechanism (ETS) has provided a strong market signal for
renewable energy investments, a tool that India has not yet adopted.
iii. Both the EU and India are leaders in solar energy, but Europe has focused more on
decentralized energy systems (such as rooftop solar) and cross-border energy
trading.
i. While India has focused on solar and onshore wind energy, the UK has become a
pioneer in offshore wind, leveraging its geographic advantage and technological
leadership in this field.
ii. The CfD mechanism in the UK has been more effective in ensuring long-term price
stability for renewable energy developers, whereas India’s renewable energy
auctions have been driven by aggressive cost reductions, leading to concerns about
the financial viability of some projects.
i. Feed-in Tariffs (FiTs): Germany was one of the first countries to introduce FiTs,
offering fixed payments to renewable energy producers, which led to a rapid
increase in solar and wind capacity.
ii. Energiewende Goals: Germany aims to achieve 80% renewable electricity by 2050,
with a strong emphasis on decentralized energy production and energy efficiency.
iii. Phase-out of Nuclear Power: Following the Fukushima disaster, Germany committed
to phasing out all nuclear power by 2022, further intensifying its focus on renewable
energy.
Both countries have ambitious renewable energy targets, but Germany’s transition is more
holistic, encompassing energy efficiency, transport electrification, and deep
decarbonization.
Comparison with India: India’s focus has been on solar and wind energy, while
Norway’s reliance on hydropower gives it a different profile. However, both countries
share a commitment to electric mobility, though Norway’s EV penetration is
significantly higher, driven by extensive policy support.