Characterization of Fish Pond Wastewater-Receiving Soil and Weight Perameters of Zea Mays (Poaceae)
Characterization of Fish Pond Wastewater-Receiving Soil and Weight Perameters of Zea Mays (Poaceae)
Characterization of Fish Pond Wastewater-Receiving Soil and Weight Perameters of Zea Mays (Poaceae)
Table 1: Physical analysis of borehole water and fish pond wastewaters before application to experimental site
Wastewaters
Parameters Borehole water
Concrete Pond Earthen Pond Tarpaulin Pond
Table 2. Chemical properties of borehole water and fish pond wastewaters before application to experimental
site
Parameters Wastewaters
Borehole water
(mg/l) Concrete Pond Earthen Pond Tarpaulin Pond
The physical analysis of fish pond wastewater-receiving having the highest concentration of phosphorus (6.9 mg kg-
1), organic carbon (3.4 mg kg-1) and potassium (1.9 mg kg-
soils is shown in Table 3. The wastewater-receiving soils
showed ranges of pH, 6.3 – 6.6; temperature, 27.0 – 28.5 1), while that of earthen pond showed the highest value of
0C, electrical conductivity, 14.01 – 18.0 μs/cm and total nitrogen (1.9 mg kg-1). These were in support of earlier
dissolved solids, 27.8 – 35.9 mg/l, while the control soil reports that the application of wastewater from fish pond
had mean higher pH value of 6.8; lower temperature, 26.6 through surface irrigation system improves the physico-
0C; lower electrical conductivity, 10.7 μs/cm and lower chemical properties of the soil in terms of soil electrical
total dissolved solids, 22.0 mg/g. conductivity, total soil nitrogen, total organic carbon, total
Table 4 presents the chemical analysis of the fish pond organic matter, soil minerals, exchangeable acidity and
wastewater-receiving soil. The amount of all the cation exchangeable acidity capacity (Nsoanya, 2019;
investigated inorganic elements was found to be higher in Musa et al., 2020; Samuel et al., 2021)
wastewater-receiving soil with that from concrete pond
Table 3: Physical analysis of borehole and fish pond wastewater-receiving soils
Wastewater-Receiving Soil
Parameters Control
Concrete Pond Earthen Pond Tarpaulin Pond
The weight parameters and chlorophyll concentration of similar trend with result obtained by Ndagi et al. (2020),
wastewater-receiving Z. mays are shown in Table 5. The where highest weight yield of 0.35 tone/ha was observed in
fish pond wastewaters have great influence on the weight maize irrigated with fish pond wastewater.
of the Z. may as wastewater-receiving crops have higher In the present study, the highest chlorophyll concentration
fresh weight ranging from 8.92±0.05 kg (earthen pond was obtained in Z. mays irrigated with wastewater from the
wastewater crop) to 12.39 ±0.10 kg (concrete pond tarpaulin pond with the value of 0.59 mg g-1. However,
wastewater crop). The crop irrigated with wastewater from there is no significant difference in the chlorophyll
the concrete pond showed significant (P < 0.05) highest concentration between the control and the wastewater-
fresh weight value (12.39±0.10 kg). Furthermore, the Z. receiving Z. mays. Jawale et al. (2017) reported similar
mays irrigated with fish pond wastewater had higher dry findings in maize where the highest chlorophyll content of
weight (3.31±0.01-3.93±0.05 kg) as compared to the 0.76 mg g-1 was observed in treatment receiving complete
control crop weight (3.29±0.04 kg). The result shows a nutrient package from wastewaters.
Table 5: Weight and chlorophyll content of fish pond wastewater-receiving Zea mays
Wastewater-Receiving Maize
Parameters Control
Concrete Pond Earthen Pond Tarpaulin Pond
Conclusion https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-804564-
The study revealed a higher influence of wastewater from 0.00006-5
different fish pond over the borehole water on Zea mays Islam MS, Khanam MS & Sarker NI 2018. Health risk
weight and chlorophyll concentration through soil quality assessment of metals transfer from soil to the
improvement. Maize irrigated with fish pond wastewater edible part of some vegetables grown in
had higher fresh and dry weights as compared to the control Patuakhali province of Bangladesh. Arc Agri
crop weight but no significant difference in the chlorophyll Environ Sci., 3(2): 187-97.
concentration between the control and the wastewater- Jawale SA, Patil VD, Jawale SA & Satpute U 2017. Effect
receiving crops. However, the influence of wastewater of soil fertility levels on chlorophyll content of
from concrete pond can be concluded to be more efficient maize crop. Journal of Pharmacognosy and
for maximum soil quality for Z mays production. Phytochemistry, 6(6): 95-97.
KNARDA 2006. Mission, vision and achievements of the
References special mass food production programme, Kano
Abdulrahman BL & Mustapha AA 2021. Chemical State. Kano state Ministry of agriculture and rural
characterization of some selected organic development publication No. 31. 2-10.
materials with potentials as soil amendments in Musa JJ, Dada PO, Adewumi JK, Otuaro EA, Musa ET,
Kano State, Nigeria. Journal of Agricultural Otache MY & Yusuf S 2020. Fish Pond Effluent
Economics, Environment and Social Sciences, Effect on Physico-chemical Properties of Soils in
7(1): 241-251. 19. Southern Guinea Savanna, Nigeria. Open Access
APHA 2005. Standard methods for the examination of Library Journal, 7: 1-16.
water and wastewater. American Public Health Mustapha AA, Lawan B, Dawaki MU, Magaji MJ &
Association (21st ed.). Washington D.C. Pp 80 – Abdulwahab M 2017. Solubility of N, P, K and
82. pH variability as influenced by mineral fertilizer
Boyd CE 2017. General relationship between water quality and organic amendment on sandy loam in Kano
and aquaculture performance in ponds. In Fish State. Savanna Journal of Agriculture, 12(2): 30–
diseases, Prevention and Control Strategies (pp. 35.
147-166). Academic Press.