Thickness of Foil and Thin Sheet by Mass Measurement: Standard Test Method For
Thickness of Foil and Thin Sheet by Mass Measurement: Standard Test Method For
Thickness of Foil and Thin Sheet by Mass Measurement: Standard Test Method For
for the
Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.
Designation: E252 − 24
This standard has been approved for use by agencies of the U.S. Department of Defense.
1
E252 − 24
where: 7. Precision and Bias
T = thickness of the foil, or sheet, in. (or cm), 7.1 Following the procedure outlined in this test method,
M = mass of the specimen (without coating), lb (or g), repeated mass measurements of the same specimen on different
A = area of the specimen, in.2 (or cm2), and balances should result in agreement within 1 mg. It is outside
D = density of the foil, or sheet, lb/in.3 (or g/cm3). of the scope of this test method to describe maintenance and
NOTE 1—Common conversion factors are 102 cm = 1 m; 103 g = 1 kg;
104 cm2 = 1 m2; 1 g ⁄cm3 = 103 kg ⁄m3.
calibration procedures for balances, but disagreement larger
than 1 mg warrants attention to maintenance or recalibration of
6.2 Densities of Aluminum Alloys: the balance.
6.2.1 Calculate the density of aluminum foil or sheet from
chemical composition limits of the alloy by the method 8. Keywords
described in Annex A2. 8.1 density; dimensions; foil; gauge; mass; measure; thick-
NOTE 2—The densities of foil or sheet alloys determined in this manner ness; thin sheet
are accurate to within 6 0.3 %.
6.2.2 Calculated densities for some of the common alumi-
num foil or sheet alloys in Table 1 may be used.
ANNEXES
(Mandatory Information)
A1.1 General convenient to handle and can be prepared to meet the afore-
A1.1.1 Specimens of sizes and shapes other than the mentioned requirements.
8.000 in.2 (51.61 cm2) circle maybe used provided consider- A1.2 Source of Error
ation is given to controllable factors affecting the accuracy of
the method. Specifically, the area of the specimen shall be A1.2.1 Inherent errors in determining thickness by the mass
known and controlled to an accuracy of 60.1 %, and the measurement method result from the limits on the accuracy of
minimum mass of the specimen shall be 70 mg. Specimens the density value assigned to the alloy, the accuracy with which
ranging in size from 8 in.2 to 36 in.2 (52 cm2 to 230 cm2) are a specimen can be cut and its area determined, and the
2
E252 − 24
accuracy of the mass measurement. Much time could be maximum error on the method of 6 0.07 ⁄(T·A·D) % of the
devoted to a discussion of refinement of errors but it shall thickness determined. Since D, density of the foil or sheet, is
suffice here to draw on experience as a guide for determining fixed, it is seen that the magnitude of the mass measurement
the accuracy of the method. error is a function of the thickness, T, of the foil or sheet and
the area, A, of the specimen. The area, A, is a controllable
A1.3 Error From Uncertainty of Densities of Specimen factor in the method, and the importance of selecting a large
(ED)
area to minimize the overall percentage error in the method for
A1.3.1 The density of aluminum foil or sheet alloys shall be thin foil or sheet is apparent from a few simple calculations.
those listed in Table 1 or it shall be determined by the method The product T·A·D is the mass of the specimen in grams, so to
described in Annex A2. Values so obtained are accurate to prevent the mass measurement error from introducing errors in
6 0.3 % of the true density. The error imposed by uncertainty excess of 6 1.0 %, it is necessary that the mass of the specimen
of the density then is ED = 6 0.3 % of the thickness deter- be larger than 70 mg. The maximum error in the method due to
mined. mass measurement then is EM = 6 0.07 ⁄ (T·A·D) % of the
thickness determined.
A1.4 Error From Control of Area of Specimen (EA)
A1.4.1 A precision blanking press can cut a specimen whose A1.6 Maximum Error of Method
area is known and reproducible to an accuracy of 60.1 %. If d
A1.6.1 If ED, EA, and EM represent the errors in percentage
is the specific diameter required to provide the area used in the
of thickness determined as imposed by the limits of accuracy of
thickness computation, then the error in area resulting from a
density, area, and mass measurement, respectively, then the
small error, ∆d, in the diameter is 200 ∆d/d %. It follows then
maximum error of the method is (ED + EA + EM) percent of the
that to maintain an area accurate to 60.1 %, the tolerance on
thickness determined. Since these errors at a given test location
the diameter of the blanked circle shall be 60.0005 times the
are normally in the nature of a bias rather than random error,
circle diameter. The fact that the tolerance on diameter de-
the accuracy of the method is best described in terms of this
creases in direct proportion to the diameter is a factor to
maximum error. The maximum error of the method in percent
consider in selecting the specimen size to use in the method.
Compliance with this tolerance limits the area error to is as follows:
EA = 6 0.1 % of the thickness determined.
F
E D 1E A 1E M 5 0.4 1
0.07
~T · A · D! G (A1.1)
A1.5 Error From Measuring Mass of Specimen (EM)
where:
A1.5.1 The accuracy of measuring the mass of a foil or
T·A·D = is the mass of the specimen in grams.
sheet specimen has been found to be 0.7 mg. This imposes a
A2.1 Calculation the mean determined for the combined limit in A2.1.2.2 by the
number of elements in the combined limit. Round each element
A2.1.1 The following describes the procedures that shall be
concentration to the number of places indicated in Table A2.1.
used to calculate nominal densities of aluminum and aluminum
alloys. A2.1.2.4 Calculate the concentration of aluminum by sub-
tracting the total element concentrations in A2.1.2.1 – A2.1.2.3
A2.1.2 The form shown in Table A2.1 is convenient for from 100. Round the aluminum concentration to two decimal
making such calculations. A sample calculation is shown for places. For 1XXX series aluminum, calculated aluminum
5052 alloy. content may be less than the specified minimum aluminum
A2.1.2.1 For each alloying element, determine the arithme- content. Nevertheless, the calculated aluminum content should
tic mean of its registered limits. Round the mean to the number be used for purposes of this calculation procedure.
of places indicated in Table A2.2. Rounding, except when A2.1.2.5 Multiply each element concentration determined
specified otherwise, shall be in accordance with the rounding in A2.1.2.1 – A2.1.2.4 by the value 1/Density given in Table
method of Practice E29. A2.2. Round each of these results to three decimal places.
A2.1.2.2 For each impurity element or combination of A2.1.2.6 Add the values determined in A2.1.2.5 together
impurity elements for which a maximum limit is registered, and divide this sum into the number 100. The result is the
determine the arithmetic mean using zero as the minimum unrounded density in SI units (kg/m3).
limit. Round the mean to the number of places indicated in A2.1.2.7 Determine the final expression of density in SI
Table A2.1. units (kg/m3) by rounding the value determined in A2.1.2.6 as
A2.1.2.3 For impurity elements having a combined limit follows:
(such as Si + Fe), consider each of the elements to have an (1) For aluminum and aluminum alloys having a specified
equal concentration. Calculate the concentrations by dividing minimum aluminum content of 99.35 % or greater, round the
3
E252 − 24
TABLE A2.1 Density Calculations of Aluminum and Aluminum TABLE A2.2 Precision for Standard Limits for Alloy Elements and
Alloys at 20 °C Impurities
Example for Alloy 5052 Less than 1/1000% 0.000×
1/DensityA, B, C Mass Percent 1/Density × Mass 1/1000 to 1/100 % 0.00×
Element (m3/kg) Present (%) Percent Present 1/100 to 1/10 %
Si 4.292 × 10-4 0.12 0.52 × 10-4 Unalloyed aluminum made by a refining process 0.0××
Fe 1.271 × 10-4 0.20 0.25 × 10-4 Alloys and unalloyed aluminum not made by a 0.0×
Cu 1.116 × 10-4 0.05 0.06 × 10-4 refining process 0.0×
Mn 1.346 × 10-4 0.05 0.07 × 10-4 1/10 through 1/2 % 0.××
Mg 5.522 × 10-4 D 2.5 13.80 × 10-4 Over 1/2 % 0.×, × .×, and so
Cr 1.391 × 10-4 0.25 0.35 × 10-4 forth.
Ni 1.123 × 10-4
Zn 1.401 × 10-4 0.05 0.07 × 10-4
Ti 2.219 × 10-4
B 4.274 × 10-4
as X.XX0 × 103 or X.XX5 × 103.
Bi 1.020 × 10-4 (2) For aluminum and aluminum alloys having a specified
Ga 1.693 × 10-4 minimum aluminum content less than 99.35 %, round the value
Li 14.410 × 10-4 D
Pb 0.882 × 10-4
obtained to the nearest multiple of 0.01 and expressed as
Sn 1.371 × 10-4 X.XX × 103.
V 1.639 × 10-4
Zr 1.541 × 10-4 NOTE A2.1—Limiting the expression of density to the number of
Be 5.411 × 10-4 decimal places indicated above is based on the fact that composition
Cd 1.156 × 10-4 C variations are discernible from one cast to another for most alloys. The
Co 1.130 × 10-4 C expression of density values to more decimal places than is outlined above
3.22 15.12 × 10-4 implies a higher precision than is justified.
(Subtotal)
AI 3.705 × 10-4 96.78 358.57 × 10-4 A2.1.2.8 Multiply the unrounded value obtained in A2.1.2.6
(Remainder)
-4
by 3.612729 × 10-2 to calculate the unrounded density in
100.00 373.69 × 10
(Total)
lb/in.3.
A2.1.2.9 Determine the final expression of density in units
Calculated Density (lb/in.3) by rounding the value determined in A2.1.2.8 as
100/373.69 × 104 = 2.68 × 103
kg/m3 follows:
= 0.097 lb ⁄in.3 (1) For aluminum and aluminum alloys having a specified
A
Aluminum Properties and physical Metallurgy, ed. John E. Hatch, American minimum aluminum content of 99.35 % or greater, round the
Society for Metals, Metals Park, OH, 1984, pp. 201–203.
B
value obtained to the nearest multiple of 0.0005 and expressed
Kunkle, D. E. and Willey, L. A., “Densities of Wrought Aluminum Alloys,” Journal
of Materials, ASTM, Vol 1, No. 1, March 1966.
as 0.XXX0 or 0.XXX5.
C
Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 71st Edition, ed. Lide, D. R., CRC Press, (2) For aluminum and aluminum alloys having a specified
1991. minimum aluminum content less than 99.35 %, round the value
D
The densities used for these elements are different than the handbook densities
because of the metallurgical formations that normally occur in alloys containing
obtained to the nearest multiple of 0.001 and expressed as
these elements. 0.XXX.
A2.2 Accuracy
A2.2.1 The accuracy of the density arrived at by this method
is 60.3 % of the determined value for the common foil or sheet
alloys and 60.5 % for highly alloyed compositions such as
value obtained to the nearest multiple of 0.005 and expressed 2024.
SUMMARY OF CHANGES
Committee B07 has identified the location of selected changes to this standard since the last issue
(E252 – 06 (2021)ɛ1) that may impact the use of this standard. (Approved May 15, 2024.)
(1) Changed title from “Standard Test Method for Thickness of (4) 2.2—Deleted reference to D1505.
Foil, Thin Sheet, and Film by Mass Measurement” to “Stan- (5) 2.3 and Footnote 3—Added references for Aluminum
dard Test Method for Thickness of Foil and Thin Sheet by Association documents and footnote on how to obtain.
Mass Measurement.” (6) Section 3—Added Significant and Use.
(2) 1.1 and 6.1—Deleted references to film and references to (7) 4.1, 4.2, 5.1 and A1.1.1—Updated significant digits for the
Annex A3. SI values.
(3) 1.2.1—Added this section with units for density in lb/in.3 (8) 5.1, 5.2, and 5.3—Rearranged sections.
(kg/m3) to be consistent with Aluminum Association. (9) 6.1—Updated units.
4
E252 − 24
(10) Note 1—Added note with common conversion factors. (12) Section 8—Added Keywords.
(11) Table 1, Footnote A, B and C—Updated units for density (13) Annex A2 and Table A2.1—Updated units for density in
in lb/in.3 (kg/m3) to be consistent with Aluminum Association lb/in.3 (kg/m3) to be consistent with Aluminum Association.
and updated footnotes. (14) Annex A3—Removed Annex A3.
ASTM International takes no position respecting the validity of any patent rights asserted in connection with any item mentioned
in this standard. Users of this standard are expressly advised that determination of the validity of any such patent rights, and the risk
of infringement of such rights, are entirely their own responsibility.
This standard is subject to revision at any time by the responsible technical committee and must be reviewed every five years and
if not revised, either reapproved or withdrawn. Your comments are invited either for revision of this standard or for additional standards
and should be addressed to ASTM International Headquarters. Your comments will receive careful consideration at a meeting of the
responsible technical committee, which you may attend. If you feel that your comments have not received a fair hearing you should
make your views known to the ASTM Committee on Standards, at the address shown below.
This standard is copyrighted by ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959,
United States. Individual reprints (single or multiple copies) of this standard may be obtained by contacting ASTM at the above
address or at 610-832-9585 (phone), 610-832-9555 (fax), or [email protected] (e-mail); or through the ASTM website
(www.astm.org). Permission rights to photocopy the standard may also be secured from the Copyright Clearance Center, 222
Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, Tel: (978) 646-2600; http://www.copyright.com/