4 Limit 2
4 Limit 2
Let c be a constant, and let limx→a f (x) and limx→a g(x) exist.
Then
1. limx→a [f (x) + g(x)] = limx→a f (x) + limx→a g(x)
2. limx→a [f (x) − g(x)] = limx→a f (x) − limx→a g(x)
3. limx→a [c · f (x)] = c · limx→a f (x)
4. limx→a [f (x) · g(x)] = limx→a f (x) · limx→a g(x)
f (x) limx→a f (x)
5. limx→a g(x) = limx→a g(x) if limx→a g(x) 6= 0
-1
(we cannot use the limit laws)
Calculating Limits using Limit Laws
x 3 + 2x 2 − 1
lim
x→−2 5 − 3x
limx→−2 (x 3 + 2x 2 − 1)
= (law 5)
limx→−2 (5 − 3x)
limx→−2 x 3 + 2 limx→−2 x 2 − limx→−2 1
= (law 1, 2, 3)
limx→−2 5 − 3 limx→−2 x
(−2) + 2 · (−2)2 − 1
3
= (law 7, 8)
5 − 3 · (−2)
1
=−
11
Computing Limits: Direct Substitution Property
Direct Substitution Property
If f is a polynomial or a rational and a is in the domain of f , then:
lim f (x) = f (a)
x→a
x 3 +2x 2 −1
The function g(x) = 5−3x is rational and −2 is in the
domain; hence:
(−2)3 + 2 · (−2)2 − 1 1
lim g(x) = g(−2) = =−
x→−2 5 − 3 · (−2) 11
Computing Limits: Function Replacement
Function Replacement
If f (x) = g(x) for all x 6= a, then limx→a f (x) = limx→a g(x)
(provided that the limit exists).
Actually it suffices f (x) = g(x) when x is close to a.
x 2 −1
Find limx→1 x−1 .
I Direct substitution is not applicable because x = 1 is not in
the domain.
We replace the function:
x2 − 1 (x + 1)(x − 1) for x 6= 1
= = x +1
x −1 x −1
As a consequence
x2 − 1
lim = lim x + 1 = 1 + 1 = 2
x→1 x − 1 x→1
Computing Limits: Function Replacement
Find
(3 + h)2 − 9
lim
h→0 h
We have:
(3 + h)2 − 9 9 + 6h + h2 − 9 6h + h2 for h 6= 0
= = = 6+h
h h h
As a consequence:
(3 + h)2 − 9
lim = lim (6 + h) = 6
h→0 h h→0
Computing Limits: Function Replacement
Find √
t2 + 9 − 3
lim
t→0 t2
We have:
√ √ √
t2 + 9 − 3 t2 + 9 − 3 t2 + 9 + 3 t2 + 9 − 9
= · √ = √
t2 t2 t2 + 9 + 3 t 2 · ( t 2 + 9 + 3)
t2 for t 6= 0 1
= √ = √
2 2
t · ( t + 9 + 3) 2
t +9+3
As a consequence:
√
t2 + 9 − 3 1
lim 2
= lim √
t→0 t t→0 t2 + 9 + 3
1
=p by laws 5, 1, 9, 7
limt→0 (t 2 + 9) + 3
1 1
=√ =
9+3 6
Limits and One-Sided Limits
If f (x) = g(x) for all x < a, then limx→a− f (x) = limx→a− g(x).
If f (x) = g(x) for all x > a, then limx→a+ f (x) = limx→a+ g(x).
If f (x) = g(x) for all x > a, then limx→a+ f (x) = limx→a+ g(x).
If f (x) = g(x) for all x > a, then limx→a+ f (x) = limx→a+ g(x).
|x|
Proof that limx→0 x does not exist.
|x| x
For all x > 0 we have x = x = 1. Thus
|x|
lim = lim+ 1 = 1
x→0+ x x→0
|x| −x
For all x < 0 we have x = x = −1. Thus
|x|
lim− = lim− −1 = −1
x→0 x x→0
If
I f (x) ≤ g(x) when x is near a (except possibly a),
I limx→a f (x) exists, and
I limx→a g(x) exist,
then
lim f (x) ≤ lim g(x)
x→a x→a
h(x)
y
g(x)
L
f (x)
0 a x
We have
1
−x 2 ≤ x 2 · sin ≤ x2
x
We take f (x) = −x 2 and h(x) = x 2 .
y x2
x 2 · sin x1
0 x
−x 2