AOWSDC2024 - Tournament Briefing

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 11

AOWSDC Tournament Briefing

• A tournament run for students, by students. All profit goes to charity.


Table of Contents

• Debate Rules
• Judging Criteria
• Tournament Schedule
• Further Questions: Contact US
Debate Rules: Iron Person

• If only 2 members of the team can be present for a round, iron-personing (one speaker
doing the speech(es) of the missing teammate in addition to their own speech) is
allowed. Each team can only iron-man once during the preliminary rounds, and iron-
manning is not allowed in the eliminary rounds.
Debate Rules: Speaker Order

Proposition 1st Speaker (6 Opposition 1st Speaker (6


min) min)

Proposition 2nd Speaker (6 Opposition 2nd Speaker (6


min) min)

Proposition 3rd Speaker (6 Opposition 3rd Speaker


min) (6min)

Opposition Reply Proposition Reply


(4 min) (4 min)
Debate Rules: Speaker Roles

Proposition Opposition

1st Speaker • Defines the motion • May challenge the definition / characterization of
• Characterizes the debate (where does it take place, who proposition if necessary
are the stakeholders) • Presents rebuttals
• Presents arguments • Presents substantives

2nd Speaker • Presents rebuttals • Presents rebuttals


• Extend and further develop the proposition case • (Could) Extend and further develop the opposition case

3rd Speaker • Organize the clashes of the debate • Organize the clashes of the debate
• Provide further material (rebuttal / developing previous • Provide further material (rebuttal / developing previous
arguments) arguments)
• No new arguments • No new arguments

Reply Speaker • Holistic overview of the debate


• Answer: Why should your team win?
Debate Rules: Points of
Information
• Points of Information (POIs) are short questions / comments the opposing team asks a
speaker.
• POIs can be asked verbally (open the mic and say “POI”) or via the chat (type POI into the
chat).
• Speakers have the right to accept or reject POIs but are recommended to accept at least
one per speech.
• The person offering has a max of 15 seconds to state their point; however, the speaker has
the floor and has the absolute right to end a POI. In most cases it is good strategy to allow
the person offering a point to finish. The judge will attempt to indicate at the 15 second
mark but it is ultimately the job of debaters to keep track of when POIs are allowed or not
• There is no rule dictating time between POIs; however, "barracking" is not allowed. Thus,
POIs should not be offered repeatedly or dispruptively to impede the speaker or the judge's
ability to hear a speaker. Good practice is to wait 15-seconds between POIs
• POIs can be asked between the first and fifth minutes of the speech. The first and last
minute are protected time (POIs cannot be asked).
Debate Rules: Defining
the Motion
• Proposition 1st Speaker should define the motion in their speech in a clear and fair
manner. Only Opposition 1st has the right to challenge the definition. If they do, they must
1 Offer an alternative definition 2. Offer a substantive justification for the challenge. The
judge will decide whether to accept the challenge.
• What is not allowed:
• Squirreling: Distorting the motion. E.g. For the motion “THW permit people under
18 to sell their organs”, squirreling could look like defining organs as keyboard
instruments producing sound through pipes.
• Adding limitations (without justification) that the motion did not specify. E.g. For
the motion “TH regrets the rise of KPop”, saying that the debate takes place in
China is an arbitrary limitation. However, explaining why the motion takes place in
a specific setting is allowed (and encouraged). E.g. “TH, as the government, would
direct funds towards environment-protection policies at the cost of economically
lucrative activities (e.g. extracting fossil fuels, manufacturing, etc.)” The phrase “At
the cost of” implies that the government has a tight budget, and therefore we can
reasonably conclude that this motion likely takes place in a developing nation.
(Violations of) Debate Rules
What is the most obvious reasonable interpretation of the topic? Don't try to
twist or change that. (DO NOT SQUIRREL)

What do I think the people who set the topic wanted us to debate? (DO NOT GIVE
AN UNFAIR SETTING / CHARACTER)

In general, definitions should give BOTH SIDES an equal and fair chance to
debate. (TRUISM / TAUTOLOGY IS BANNED)

*When in doubt, ask the Motions Comittee.


Judging Criteria

Content (40%) Style (40%) Strategy (20%)


What is being presented How the speech is delivered. Why the content is presented
Style includes:
Substantives, rebuttals / responses, • Eye contact
Deals with prioritization and time
and POIs • Volume of the voice allocation
• Emotions
• Hand gestures
Points can be awarded if the
• Vocabulary (too technical or too lay) speakers picked out the right issues
Style does NOT include: to focus on, regardless of how well
• Accents the material is presented.
• The individual characteristics of a speaker’s
voice
Tournament Schedule (UTC+8)
Further Questions: Contact Us!
• Questions Regarding Competition in General: Aaron Zhu

• Questions Regarding Schedule & Debate Rules: Cathy Zhu

• Questions Regarding Equity: Yiwei Jiang

• Questions Regarding Judging: Mimi Wu

You might also like