MARK SCHEME For The June 2005 Question Paper: University of Cambridge International Examinations
MARK SCHEME For The June 2005 Question Paper: University of Cambridge International Examinations
MARK SCHEME For The June 2005 Question Paper: University of Cambridge International Examinations
w
w
.X
tr
me
eP
ap
er
s.c
om
UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE INTERNATIONAL EXAMINATIONS
International General Certificate of Secondary Education
0495 SOCIOLOGY
This mark scheme is published as an aid to teachers and students, to indicate the requirements of the
examination. It shows the basis on which Examiners were initially instructed to award marks. It does
not indicate the details of the discussions that took place at an Examiners’ meeting before marking
began. Any substantial changes to the mark scheme that arose from these discussions will be
recorded in the published Report on the Examination.
All Examiners are instructed that alternative correct answers and unexpected approaches in
candidates’ scripts must be given marks that fairly reflect the relevant knowledge and skills
demonstrated.
Mark schemes must be read in conjunction with the question papers and the Report on the
Examination.
• CIE will not enter into discussion or correspondence in connection with these mark schemes.
CIE is publishing the mark schemes for the June 2005 question papers for most IGCSE and GCE
Advanced Level and Advanced Subsidiary Level syllabuses and some Ordinary Level syllabuses.
Grade thresholds taken for Syllabus 0495 (Sociology) in the June 2005
examination.
The threshold (minimum mark) for B is set halfway between those for Grades A and C.
The threshold (minimum mark) for D is set halfway between those for Grades C and E.
The threshold (minimum mark) for G is set as many marks below the F threshold as the
E threshold is above it.
Grade A* does not exist at the level of an individual component.
June 2005
IGCSE
MARK SCHEME
MAXIMUM MARK: 90
SYLLABUS/COMPONENT: 0495/01
SOCIOLOGY
Paper 1
Page 1 Mark Scheme Syllabus Paper
IGCSE – June 2005 0495 1
Two marks for a clear, accurate definition and one mark for a worthy but flawed
effort.
(b) Describe two types of sample that may be used in sociological research to
represent a larger population. [4]
One mark for each type of sample and one mark for development. [2 x 2 marks].
(c) Explain why the data collected using social surveys ‘can be easily coded
and analysed and should not vary according to the person(s) collecting it’.[4]
(d) Suggest two strengths and two limitations of longitudinal studies. [8]
One mark for each strength/limitation and one mark for development (4 x 2
marks). Strengths include: identify trends and changes; usually high in validity
and depth; can cover a lot of variables; reasonably cheap. Limitations include:
time consuming; difficulty attracting and retaining people to study over an
extended period; subjects may be influenced by the presence of the researcher
and change their behaviour accordingly.
One mark for each advantage/limitation and one mark for development (4 x 2 marks).
Advantages include: cheap; quick; reliable; responses easily coded; quantifiable
data; limited involvement of the researcher with the respondents. Limitations
include: low response rate with postal questionnaires; low validity; difficulty
controlling who answers the questionnaire; potential bias in the wording of the
questions.
Two marks for a clear, accurate definition and one mark for a worthy but flawed
effort. Socialisation is the process through which humans learn the norms and
values of their society.
Two marks for a clear and accurate definition of each term and one mark for a
worthy but flawed definition.
(c) Explain how a child learns to interact with other people. [6]
(d) How far is it true that socialisation, rather than instinct, is the major factor
shaping human behaviour? [8]
0-4 Answers at this level are likely to reveal a limited understanding of the
question and will possibly focus on general accounts of what socialisation
involves.
5-8 Some attempt will be made to address the issue of whether socialisation is
the major factor shaping human behaviour. Examples of feral children
and/or cross-cultural variations in behaviour patterns may be used to
illustrate the point. Up to 6 marks maybe awarded for thorough accounts of
socialisation. At the top of the band the assessment will be explicit and
supported by relevant arguments and/or evidence.
Two marks for a clear, accurate definition and one mark for a worthy but flawed
effort. Social control refers to the range of measures used in a society to
persuade people to abide by the prevailing norms and values.
Two marks for a clear and accurate definition of each term and one mark for a
worthy but flawed definition. Formal control refers to the legal, public forms of
controlling the population, where informal control occurs within the context of the
socialisation process.
(c) Explain how social control is maintained in small-scale, tribal societies. [6]
0-3 A few isolated points about informal social control may be all we can expect
at this level.
(d) Assess different sociological theories about which groups benefit from
social control. [8]
0-4 A few commonsense observations about who benefits from social control
may justify 3 or 4 marks.
5-8 Answers at this level are likely to demonstrate some understanding of the
different sociological perspectives, especially functionalist and Marxist. If
such references were clear and accurate, a mark towards the top of the
band would be justified.
Two marks for a clear, accurate definition and one mark for a worthy but flawed
effort. Social class is the main form of social stratification in modern industrialised
societies. It is based on economic and status differences.
(b) Describe two problems in using occupation to measure social class. [4]
One mark for each problem identified and one mark for development. (2 x 2
marks). Problems include: classifications based on occupation omit certain
groups, such as the rich, the unemployed, the retired; they ignore the fact that
some people in similar occupations may have very different backgrounds and
resources; they ignore or gloss over the fact that the same job title can mean very
different things in different circumstances.
(c) Explain why the sharp division between manual and non-manual workers is
now becoming out of date. [6]
0-3 A few simple observations about the division between manual and non-
manual workers may be worth 2 or 3 marks.
4-6 There will be at least a basic attempt to explain why the division between
manual and non-manual workers has become blurred in recent years. If
this were well informed and developed, a mark at the top of the band would
be justified.
(d) How far is Marx’s theory of social class still relevant today? [8]
0-4 A few observations about Marx’s theory of social class, probably mostly
descriptive, would be worth 3 or 4 marks.
5-8 A sound account of Marx’s theory of class with some attempt to assess its
relevance for today would merit 5 or 6 marks. If the analysis were more
developed, a mark at the top of the band would be appropriate.
Two marks for a clear, accurate definition and one mark for a worthy but flawed
effort. An ethnic minority is a group of people who share a common culture that is
different from that of the majority of society.
One mark for each example identified and one mark for development. (2 x 2
marks). Answers may refer to the generic categories of gender, ethnic, and age
discrimination and/or to particular examples such as different rates of pay for the
same job or favouritism in promoting one individual or group ahead of another.
(c) Explain why women are often paid less than men. [6]
0-3 A few isolated points, perhaps list-like, about why women are paid less than
men would be worth 2 or 3 marks.
(d) In what ways may a person’s life chances be affected by the job he or she
does? [8]
5-8 A clear account of some of the ways that life chances may be affected by
occupation is required to trigger this band. Breadth and/or depth of
analysis will distinguish answers at the top of the band.
Two marks for a clear, accurate definition and one mark for a worthy but flawed
effort. Power may be defined as a social relationship in which there is a high
probability of persons or groups carrying out their will even when opposed by
others.
One mark for each example identified and one mark for development (2 x 2).
Examples include: federal, constitutional monarchy, representative democracy,
authoritarian/totalitarian regime, absolute monarchy, etc.
0-3 A few basic observations, perhaps poorly expressed and/or short of detail,
would merit 2 or 3 marks.
4-6 A coherent and plausible explanation would figure in this band. If the main
features of the political system were described in reasonable detail, a mark
at the top of the band would be justified.
(d) Discuss the strengths and limitations of the pluralist theory of power. [8]
0-4 If some limited understanding of the pluralist theory of power is shown, with
little development or application to the question as such, a mark of 3 or 4
might be justified.
5-8 A sound account of the strengths and limitations of the pluralist theory, not
necessarily balanced, would trigger this band. The more strengths and
limitations identified the higher in the band the answer should be placed.
Two marks for a clear, accurate definition and one mark for a worthy but flawed
effort. Pressure groups are groups formed to defend or promote one specific
cause or interest.
One mark for each function identified and one mark for development (2 x 2).
Functions of political parties include: selection of candidates; campaigning in
elections; policy formation; raising funds to support candidates and fight
elections; and a training ground for future political leaders.
(c) Explain how pressure groups can achieve their aims. [6]
0-3 A few commonsense points with limited development and insight would be
worth 2 or 3 marks.
4-6 Answers at this level will identify a range of appropriate tactics and
strategies that may be used by pressure groups to achieve their aims. The
more coherent and developed the explanation, the higher in the band it
should be placed.
0-4 Some isolated points about pressure groups and/or democracy, with few
relevant links made between the two, may be worth 3 or 4 marks.