Literature - Review - 2024 10 27 - 12 12 23
Literature - Review - 2024 10 27 - 12 12 23
Literature - Review - 2024 10 27 - 12 12 23
AskYourPDF
# Literature Review: Design and Optimization of the Vortex Turbine for Low-Head Hydropower (2019-2024)
## Introduction The design and optimization of vortex turbines for low-head hydropower applications have
garnered significant attention in recent years, particularly given the growing demand for sustainable and
efficient energy sources. Low-head hydropower systems, characterized by their ability to generate energy at
sites with a height difference of less than five meters, present unique challenges and opportunities for turbine
design. This literature review synthesizes recent findings from various studies focused on vortex turbines and
related technologies, highlighting advancements, knowledge gaps, and potential future directions for research.
## Current Developments in Vortex Turbine Design Recent studies emphasize the relevance of Archimedes
Screw Turbines (ASTs) to vortex turbine design, as ASTs have demonstrated practical efficiencies ranging from
60% to 80% in low-head conditions (Yoosefdoost & Lubitz, 2020). The environmental benefits of ASTs, such
as minimal impact on aquatic ecosystems, underscore the importance of sustainable practices in hydropower
design. These insights suggest that the principles of AST design could be instrumental in enhancing vortex
turbine performance, particularly with respect to efficiency and ecological considerations. The exploration of
gravitational surface vortices is critical, as these vortices can significantly hamper turbine performance in low-
head hydropower plants (Zheng et al., 2022). Studies have proposed semi-empirical models to predict vortex
characteristics based on intake geometry and flow conditions, which can inform the design of turbine blades and
intake structures. Understanding fluid dynamics in this context is essential for developing vortex turbines that
operate effectively under varying conditions. Moreover, research on very low head turbines (VLH) has
demonstrated the potential for high efficiency, reporting values up to 90% (Qiu et al., 2019). The application of
advanced computational tools and design criteria, such as minimum pressure coefficients, provides a framework
for the optimization of vortex turbines, enhancing their performance in low-head scenarios. This finding aligns
with the growing body of literature advocating for the integration of innovative design practices in turbine
development. ## Challenges and Knowledge Gaps Despite the advancements in vortex turbine design, several
knowledge gaps remain. The investigation of gravitational surface vortices has highlighted their detrimental
effects on flow stability and turbine performance; however, more research is needed to develop effective control
measures to mitigate these effects (Zheng et al., 2022). Additionally, while studies have explored the influence
of blade shape and operational parameters on turbine efficiency, there is a lack of comprehensive data that
correlates specific design features with performance outcomes across various low-head conditions.
Furthermore, while existing research emphasizes sustainable practices and economic viability, there is still a
need for more case studies that demonstrate the practical integration of vortex turbines into existing hydropower
infrastructures. The potential for retrofitting vortex turbines into current systems offers a valuable opportunity
for enhancing energy recovery without significant ecological disruption, yet empirical evidence supporting these
applications remains sparse. ## Future Research Directions Future research should focus on several key areas
to address the existing knowledge gaps and enhance the design and optimization of vortex turbines: 1. **Fluid
Dynamics and Vortex Control**: Continued exploration of fluid dynamics associated with gravitational surface
vortices is essential. Developing more sophisticated models to predict vortex behavior and implementing
advanced control systems could significantly improve the performance and reliability of vortex turbines in low-
head applications. 2. **Design Innovations**: Further investigation into innovative design parameters,
including the optimization of blade geometries and intake structures, is crucial. Collaborating with
computational fluid dynamics (CFD) techniques could yield valuable insights into the interplay between design
features and turbine efficiency. 3. **Empirical Case Studies**: Conducting comprehensive field studies that
document the performance of vortex turbines in real-world applications will provide critical data to inform
future designs. Emphasizing the integration of these turbines into existing infrastructures will also foster a better
understanding of their economic viability and ecological impacts. 4. **Sustainability Metrics**: Developing
standardized metrics for assessing the environmental impact of vortex turbines will facilitate comparisons across
various systems and promote the adoption of best practices in turbine design. 5. **Digitalization and
Governance**: Exploring the role of digital technologies and governance systems in optimizing low-head
hydropower operations may unveil new strategies for enhancing turbine performance and ensuring sustainable
energy generation. ## Conclusion The literature surrounding vortex turbines for low-head hydropower systems
underscores the importance of integrating design innovation, sustainability, and empirical research. By
addressing existing knowledge gaps and pursuing targeted future research directions, the potential for vortex
turbines to contribute significantly to renewable energy generation can be realized, paving the way for more
sustainable hydropower solutions. ## References: 1. Tang, Lingdi., Yuan, S.., Tang, Yue., & Qiu, Zhipeng.
(2019). Optimization of impulse water turbine based on GA-BP neural network arithmetic. <i>Journal of
Mechanical Science and Technology</i> , 33 , 241-253 . http://doi.org/10.1007/S12206-018-1224-3 2.
https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/72945b43f5d7c87e6a3e44282a1ad3ed227b2694 3. Suerich-Gulick, F..,
Gaskin, S.., Villeneuve, M.., & Parkinson, E.. (2014). Free surface intake vortices: theoretical model and
measurements. <i>Journal of Hydraulic Research</i> , 52 , 502 - 512 .
http://doi.org/10.1080/00221686.2014.896425 4. Yoosefdoost, Arash., & Lubitz, W.. (2020). Archimedes Screw
Turbines: A Sustainable Development Solution for Green and Renewable Energy Generation—A Review of
Potential and Design Procedures. <i>Sustainability</i> . http://doi.org/10.3390/su12187352 5. Colone, L..,
Dimitrov, N.., & Štraub, D.. (2019). Predictive repair scheduling of wind turbine drive‐train components based
on machine learning. <i>Wind Energy</i> . http://doi.org/10.1002/WE.2352 6. Quaranta, E.., Bonjean,
Manuel., Cuvato, D.., Nicolet, C.., Dreyer, M.., Gaspoz, A.., Rey-Mermet, S.., Boulicaut, B.., Pratalata, Luigi.,
Pinelli, M.., Tomaselli, Giuseppe., Pinamonti, P.., Pichler, Raffael., Turin, P.., Turrin, Daniele., Foust, J..,
Trumbo, B.., Ahmann, M.., Modersitzki, M.., Kist, Susy., Mosca, C.., Malerba, C.., Francesconi, Ada., Casoli,
Ivan., Ferrari, R.., Stefani, V.., Scibetta, M.., Meucci, L.., Gostner, W.., Bergamin, R.., Pretto, F.., Turcato, D..,
Kocher, Vincent., Lefaucheux, Pierre., Elmaataoui, Abdelali., Mariucci, M.., Sarma, Prakriteesh.,
Slachmuylders, Geert., Clementi, Riccardo., Pasut, F.., & Bragato, Nicola. (2020). Hydropower Case Study
Collection: Innovative Low Head and Ecologically Improved Turbines, Hydropower in Existing Infrastructures,
Hydropeaking Reduction, Digitalization and Governing Systems. <i>Sustainability</i> , 12 , 8873 .
http://doi.org/10.3390/su12218873 7.
https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e0b98aa07f881cc12175075aba3ec21a8898bcae 8. Kueh, T.., Beh, S.
L.., Ooi, Y.., & Rilling, D.. (2017). Experimental study to the influences of rotational speed and blade shape on
water vortex turbine performance. <i>Journal of Physics: Conference Series</i> , 822 .
http://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/822/1/012066 9. Timilsina, Ashesh Babu., Mulligan, S.., & Bajracharya, T..
(2018). Water vortex hydropower technology: a state-of-the-art review of developmental trends. <i>Clean
Technologies and Environmental Policy</i> , 20 , 1737-1760 . http://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-018-1589-0 10.
Astolfi, D.., Castellani, F.., Fravolini, M. L.., Cascianelli, S.., & Terzi, L.. (2019). Precision Computation of
Wind Turbine Power Upgrades: An Aerodynamic and Control Optimization Test Case. <i>Journal of Energy
Resources Technology</i> . http://doi.org/10.1115/1.4042450 11. Astolfi, D.., Castellani, F.., & Terzi, L..
(2018). Wind Turbine Power Curve Upgrades. <i>Energies</i> , 11 , 1300 . http://doi.org/10.3390/EN11051300
12. Zheng, Gaoan., Gu, Zeheng., Xu, Weixin., Lu, Bin., Li, Qihan., Tan, Yun-chuan., Wang, Chengyan., & Li,
Lin. (2022). Gravitational Surface Vortex Formation and Suppression Control: A Review from Hydrodynamic
Characteristics. <i>Processes</i> . http://doi.org/10.3390/pr11010042 13. Qiu, Dandan., Wang, Chenglong.,
Luo, L.., Wang, S.., Zhao, Zhiqi., & Wang, Zhongqi. (2019). On heat transfer and flow characteristics of jets
impinging onto a concave surface with varying jet arrangements. <i>Journal of Thermal Analysis and
Calorimetry</i> , 141 , 57-68 . http://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-019-08901-6 14. Murugan, M.., Ghoshal, A..,
Walock, M.., Nieto, A.., Bravo, L.., Barnett, B.., Pepi, M.., Swab, J.., Pegg, R.., Rowe, Christopher., Zhu,
Dongming., & Kerner, K.. (2017). Microstructure Based Material-Sand Particulate Interactions and Assessment
of Coatings for High Temperature Turbine Blades. . http://doi.org/10.1115/GT2017-64051 15. Kasmaiee,
Saman., Tadjfar, M.., & Kasmaiee, Siroos. (2023). Machine learning-based optimization of a pitching airfoil
performance in dynamic stall conditions using a suction controller. <i>Physics of Fluids</i> .
http://doi.org/10.1063/5.0164437