Biodesign The Process of Innovating Medical Technologies 2nd Edition Paul G. Yock
Biodesign The Process of Innovating Medical Technologies 2nd Edition Paul G. Yock
Biodesign The Process of Innovating Medical Technologies 2nd Edition Paul G. Yock
com
https://ebookgate.com/product/biodesign-the-
process-of-innovating-medical-technologies-2nd-
edition-paul-g-yock/
https://ebookgate.com/product/assurance-technologies-principles-
and-a-product-process-and-system-safety-perspective-2nd-edition-
dev-g-raheja/
https://ebookgate.com/product/dictionary-of-water-and-waste-
management-2nd-ed-edition-paul-g-smith/
https://ebookgate.com/product/corporeality-medical-technologies-
and-contemporary-culture-1st-edition-francisco-ortega/
https://ebookgate.com/product/e-business-process-management-
technologies-and-solutions-1st-edition-jayavel-sounderpandian/
New Medical Technologies and Society Reordering Life
1st Edition Nik Brown
https://ebookgate.com/product/new-medical-technologies-and-
society-reordering-life-1st-edition-nik-brown/
https://ebookgate.com/product/the-essential-physics-of-medical-
imaging-2nd-edition-jerrold-t-bushberg/
https://ebookgate.com/product/medical-biochemistry-at-a-
glance-3rd-edition-j-g-salway/
https://ebookgate.com/product/the-evolution-of-eu-law-2nd-
edition-paul-craig/
https://ebookgate.com/product/intelligence-support-systems-
technologies-for-lawful-intercepts-1st-edition-paul-hoffmann/
9780521517423 Yock, Zenios & Makower PPC C M Y K
SECOND EDITION
MAKOWER
ZENIOS
YOCK
A practical guide to the new era of global opportunity [ENDORSEMENT QUOTE ]
BIODESIGN
Placement text only for
and value-based innovation in medical technology. now. Iquo blab il minctatur
soluptatur re perro
This step-by-step guide to medical technology innovation, now in color, has volorectiis quas aliquodit
been rewritten to reflect recent trends of industry globalization and value- occuptu ribusan iaturesedic
conscious healthcare. Written by a team of medical, engineering, and torerfe ribusam quatem
business experts, the authors provide a comprehensive resource that leads doles nemquam que et
students, researchers, and entrepreneurs through a proven process for the omnis rempori atessit The Process of Innovating Medical Technologies
BIODESIGN
identification, invention, and implementation of new solutions. auda aspeles excepe est,
This step-by-step guide to medical technology innovation, now in full color, has been
rewritten to reflect recent trends of industry globalization and value-conscious health-
care. Written by a team of medical, engineering, and business experts, the authors
provide a comprehensive resource that leads students, researchers, and entrepreneurs
through a proven process for the identification, invention, and implementation of new
solutions.
• Nearly 70 case studies on innovative products from around the world explore
successes and failures, provide practical advice, and enable readers to learn from
real projects.
• “Getting Started” sections for each chapter encourage readers to take action and
apply what they’ve learned to their own work.
• A collection of nearly 300 videos, created for the second edition of the book,
expand upon critical concepts, demonstrate essential activities within the process,
and bring the innovation experience to life.
• A wealth of additional material supports the book, including active links to external
websites and resources, supplementary appendices, and timely updates.
• New to this edition, two opening sections highlight the importance of globalization
and cost-effective healthcare in the medtech industry, themes which are carried
throughout the book.
Readers can access videos and additional materials quickly, easily, and at the most
relevant point in the text within the ebook, or on the companion website at ebiodesign.org,
alongside instructor resources.
“Biodesign is on the forward edge of one of the most “If you want to know how to come up with a both
exciting new frontiers of healthcare. This impressive and innovative and transformative technology in medicine,
engaging work provides a thorough look at the innova- there isn’t a better resource than this book by Paul Yock
tion process. But this is certainly not just for the scientific and his colleagues at Biodesign. Over 13 years ago, the
innovators: it is a must-read for anyone in any aspect of program at Stanford brought together trans-disciplinary
healthcare today.” innovators – engineers, physicians and business experts –
Alex Gorsky, Chairman and CEO, Johnson & Johnson to not only design their formidable program, but to teach
all the rest of us how to do it.”
“I can’t think of a more important place to turn creati- Eric J. Topol, Director, Scripps Translational Science
vity loose than in designing the future of healthcare. Institute
But it’s a complicated scene – and it’s easy to get lost
in the maze of stakeholders, regulation, and financing. “this book on biodesign will be invaluable for any inven-
Biodesign lays out a clear and logical map to find and tor or entrepreneur. It contains very useful information on
pursue opportunities for real innovation. One of the such critical areas as design principles, regulatory issues,
core messages in this new edition is that, by placing clinical trial strategies, intellectual property, reimburse-
the need for affordability up front in design process, ment strategies, and funding- and it backs them up with
innovators can more explicitly create technologies that interesting real-life experiences and case studies”.
bring value to the healthcare system. This is design Robert Langer, David H. Koch Institute Professor, MIT
thinking at its best!”
David Kelley, Founder, Hasso Plattner Institute of Design “This practical but comprehensive resource is keeping up
at Stanford University, Founder, IDEO with the rapid developments affecting medical device
innovation. The authors draw on their own extensive
“A must-to-read textbook for anyone in academia or experiences and insights, as well as diverse case studies,
industry, in any country, who wants to innovate and to present the full range of strategic and operational
deliver value to patients and health systems around considerations to bring valuable new therapies to
the world.” patients in the US and around the world.”
Koji Nakao, Chairman of Terumo and the Japanese Mark McClellan, Director, Health Care Innovation and
Federation of Medical Device Associations Value Initiative, Brookings Institution
BIODESIGN
The Process of Innovating Medical Technologies
EDITORS
Paul G. Yock
Stefanos Zenios
Josh Makower
Todd J. Brinton
Uday N. Kumar
F. T. Jay Watkins
PRINCIPAL WRITER
Lyn Denend
SPECIALTY EDITOR
Thomas M. Krummel
WEB EDITOR
Christine Q. Kurihara
ebiodesign.org
University Printing House, Cambridge CB2 8BS, United Kingdom
www.cambridge.org
Information on this title: www.cambridge.org/9781107087354
A catalogue record for this publication is available from the British Library
4
Ô India 23
Ô Japan 28 PART III: IMPLEMENT
Ô Latin America 32
Stage 5: Strategy Development 457
Process Insights 39
5.1 IP Strategy 458
PART I: IDENTIFY
Stage 1: Needs Finding
4
49
5.2 R&D Strategy
5.3 Clinical Strategy
5.4 Regulatory Strategy
478
503
534
1.1 Strategic Focus 50 5.5 Quality Management 551
1.2 Needs Exploration 67 5.6 Reimbursement Strategy 573
1.3 Need Statement Development 90 5.7 Marketing and Stakeholder Strategy 604
Acclarent Case Study: Stage 1 105 5.8 Sales and Distribution Strategy 635
Stage 2: Needs Screening 113 5.9 Competitive Advantage and Business Strategy 663
2.1 Disease State Fundamentals 114 Acclarent Case Study: Stage 5 686
2.2 Existing Solutions 133 Stage 6: Business Planning 701
2.3 Stakeholder Analysis 152 6.1 Operating Plan and Financial Model 702
2.4 Market Analysis 182 6.2 Strategy Integration and Communication 725
2.5 Needs Selection 215 6.3 Funding Approaches 748
Acclarent Case Study: Stage 2 239 6.4 Alternate Pathways 786
4
Acclarent Case Study: Stage 6 809
PART II: INVENT
About the Author Team 817
Stage 3: Concept Generation 249
Image Credits 821
3.1 Ideation 250
Glossary 822
3.2 Initial Concept Selection 268
Index 833
Acclarent Case Study: Stage 3 280
Stage 4: Concept Screening 285 See ebiodesign.org for videos, online appendices, and active web links to
4.1 Intellectual Property Basics 286 the resources listed in each chapter.
vii
Preface
There is no greater satisfaction than seeing a patient The text describes the biodesign innovation process,
being helped by a technology that you’ve had a hand in which we initially developed to support the biodesign
creating. And thanks to continuing advances in science innovation and fellowship programs at Stanford Univer-
and technology, healthcare is more open for innovation sity. Over 13þ years, the process has been built and
than at any time in history. refined based on:
Despite this promise, however, medical technology
• Presentations and mentoring by more than
innovators face significant hurdles – especially in the
200 industry leaders who have participated in our
new era of cost containment. If not managed skillfully,
training programs
patents, regulatory approval, reimbursement, market
• Our experience advising more than 150 project teams
dynamics, business models, competition, financing, clin-
that have applied the process to their work
ical trials, technical feasibility, and team dynamics (just
• Feedback from those who have learned the process
to name a few of many potential challenges) can all
through our executive education courses, as well as
prevent even the best idea from reaching patient care.
input and suggestions from students, fellows,
So, where should you begin as an innovator? What
instructors at other universities, and industry
process can you use to improve your chances of success?
representatives using the first edition of the book
What lessons can you learn from the inventors, engin-
• Extensive field-based research
eers, physicians, and entrepreneurs who have succeeded
and failed in this endeavor before? This book delivers Our confidence that the process is effective is based on
practical answers to these important questions. the results of the students and fellows trained at Stanford
and through our university-based partnerships in India
and Singapore. Already over 30 of these projects have
Who should read it and why?
been converted to externally funded companies that have
Biodesign: The Process of Innovating Medical Technolo- raised an aggregate of over $250 million. More impor-
gies provides a comprehensive roadmap for identifying, tantly, even though these are young companies, over
inventing, and implementing new medical devices, diag- 250,000 patients have already been treated by the tech-
nostics, and other technologies intended to create value nologies invented by our trainees. We have also been
for healthcare stakeholders. It has been written to be encouraged by the positive feedback we received on the
approachable for engineering, medical, and business stu- process following the release of the first edition of the text.
dents at both the undergraduate and graduate level, yet
comprehensive and sophisticated enough to satisfy the
What’s new and important in the second
needs of experienced entrepreneurs and medtech execu-
edition of the biodesign book?
tives. For instructors, it provides a proven approach for
teaching medical technology innovation that begins pre- We initially wrote the Biodesign book because there was
idea and extends through preparing for commercializa- no comprehensive text that described the complete
tion. It is ideally suited to support team-oriented, project- innovation process with a focus on the medical technol-
based learning experiences in academic and industry ogy sector. Many excellent books address entrepreneur-
settings. ship generally or pieces of the device development
ix
Preface
process, but our goal was (and is) to provide a definitive, read the section “Focus on Value” in the pages that
comprehensive resource for the medtech community. follow the preface for more context on value and how
Since the first edition of Biodesign was published in it is treated within the text.
2010, however, the medical technology industry and, 2. Going global – The first edition of the text was largely
more broadly, the healthcare ecosystem has experienced US-centric, but in the second edition we devote
tumultuous change. As healthcare costs escalate on an significantly more attention to describing the changes
unsustainable trajectory, a high priority is being placed in the process of medtech innovation resulting from
on medical technologies that deliver value – that is, good the growing importance of markets, clinical
outcomes at an affordable cost. In parallel with these opportunities, and sources of innovation outside of
forces, the global medical technology landscape is evolv- the United States. We focus on key strategic
ing rapidly, with large-scale demand for improved considerations for operating in a more global
healthcare and a new focus on frugal innovation for healthcare environment and share substantially more
developing economies. In this changing environment, examples from medtech innovators working around
veteran medtech innovators may feel as though they the world. To dig more deeply into some key issues,
are treading unfamiliar new ground, and aspiring invent- we have added a section on “Global Perspectives,” in
ors and entrepreneurs are faced with navigating an even which we spotlight six regions that present interesting
more complex and challenging landscape. medtech opportunities.
Besides the need to update the text in response to these 3. Better ways to teach and learn – While the
major environmental changes, we felt a personal impera- fundamental biodesign innovation process remains
tive to create the second edition. Over the past several the same in the new version of the text, we have
years we have learned more about how to teach the rewritten a number of sections to provide more focus
biodesign innovation process. We’ve had the chance to and clarity; and we offer more examples and case
use the text with students, fellows, entrepreneurs, and material in areas that are best understood
executives, and gather feedback from instructors at other experientially. One important take-away is that our
universities around the world who are using it in their approach appeared too linear in the first edition, and
courses. Through these interactions, we realized that we have made concerted effort to explain within the
there were messages that we could clarify and some that chapters when and why a more iterative method is
we should emphasize more strongly. As a result, we have necessary. We have also captured a number of
revised the text substantially for the second edition to important lessons in the “Process Insights” section
address three critical factors: that follows the preface. Readers will significantly
increase their effectiveness if they take these key
1. Value orientation – The healthcare industry has
themes to heart and keep them in mind as they work
become increasingly competitive, with the primary
through the chapters within each major section of
customers of medical technologies – governments,
the text.
private payers, provider groups, and patients –
focusing intensely on the cost of medical technologies Our core belief remains that innovation is both a process
and related services. In this environment, it is more and a skill that can be learned. We hope that the new edition
essential than ever for products and related services of Biodesign will help to better equip aspiring and experi-
to demonstrate measurable value to their intended enced innovators alike to be successful in the dynamic
users. The second edition of Biodesign more explicitly medtech industry. Tumultuous changes notwithstanding,
recognizes the importance of value generation in the dynamics of the emerging healthcare burden around
healthcare and includes guidance to better address the world demand continued innovation, and technology
this imperative in all phases of our process. Be sure to innovators will continue to be central to this mission.
x
Preface
How to maximize the benefit of this book: level innovation or business planning classes). And
a user’s guide experienced device executive and entrepreneurs can
use the book as a reference as they encounter specific
The steps in the biodesign innovation process build on
challenges on their way to market with a new
each other and, in this respect, it makes sense for readers
technology.
to work their way through the text in chapter order.
In terms of organization, we present the biodesign
Taking this approach provides innovators with the most
innovation process in:
complete understanding of the biodesign innovation pro-
cess and the most valuable overall learning experience. • three distinct phases, Identify, Invent, and
We have heard of many medtech innovators using the Implement;
text as a roadmap for their projects, starting at the begin- • that are divided into two stages each (six in total);
ning and following the process to help drive their • which are supported by 29 core activities, with a
progress. chapter on each one.
That said, each chapter is sufficiently robust to support
Figure P1 summarizes the overall process. Keep in mind
alternate approaches to the content. For instance,
that it’s not nearly as linear in practice as it appears in
instructors can pick and choose the chapters most rele-
this depiction. The iterative and cyclical nature of the
vant to their specific courses (e.g., some of the chapters
process is further explained throughout the text.
in the Implement section may be a bit advanced for
As you navigate Biodesign, we encourage you to
undergraduates, but they are ideally suited to graduate-
pay attention to a series of different features that
FIGURE P1
The biodesign innovation process.
xi
Preface
have been designed to help you optimize the value topics spanning the complete biodesign innovation
you receive from the text. process. These clips, which include expert
presentations and advice, interviews with innovators,
As you begin – Immediately following the preface, you’ll
demonstrations, and other exercises, are available to
find relevant information that expands upon the three
all readers in the video library at ebiodesign.org.
primary reasons we created the second edition of the
Those reading the electronic version will find select
book. These materials set a context for understanding
videos embedded in the book directly where they are
and applying the content of the chapters.
most relevant.
• Focus on value – The medtech industry is in the
midst of a transition to a stronger value orientation, in Expanded
which the improvement a technology offers relative • “From the Field” case studies – These short
to its price is an essential ingredient of success. This stories, which provide real-world examples of
section explores the forces behind this shift and their how innovators, teams, and companies have
implications to innovators as they design, develop, tackled important challenges in the biodesign
and prepare to commercialize new products and innovation process, were one of the most popular
services. features of the first edition. Accordingly, we
• Global perspectives – An introduction to factors increased the number of case studies by more
driving the globalization of the medtech industry and than 50 percent. Look for 36 new and/or
changes in how innovators source, develop, and sell rewritten stories in the second edition of the text,
their technologies. We also profile six regions, Africa, many of which spotlight groups developing
China, Europe, India, Japan, and Latin America, innovative medtech solutions outside of the US.
providing background on these geographies, At the end of each stage, we present a case
highlighting potential barriers to medtech innovation, study on Acclarent, maker of a device to
and outlining tactics that can help innovators work treat chronic sinusitis. This running example
more successfully in these areas. spotlights how one real company executed the
• Process insights – Through feedback and our entire biodesign innovation process, from need
teaching experience, we have identified a series of finding to commercialization.
key themes that you should keep top-of-mind while
reading the chapters within each major section of the Updated
book. These are core strategies that cut across the • “Getting Started” sections – For each chapter,
stages and activities within each phase and will help readers will find a practical, action-oriented guide
you to keep on track as you proceed with the process. that they can follow to execute every step in the
Instructors that emphasize these points in their biodesign innovation process when working on an
teaching and readers who embrace this information actual project. To make these sections more useful
will be able to navigate the biodesign innovation in the electronic version of the text, they have been
process more effectively. populated with active web links to take readers
directly to essential references and resources. In the
Throughout the book – You should also be on the look-
print version, the key steps for getting started are
out for a few categories of information that have been
listed, with the complete, interactive guides
added or broadened in the second edition.
accessible at ebiodesign.org.
New Enhanced
• Videos – The second edition of Biodesign is supported • ebiodesign.org – To better support the second edition
by a brand new collection of nearly 300 videos on of Biodesign, we have completely redesigned
xii
Preface
ebiodesign.org to be more user friendly and content important updates, new videos, and other learning
rich. In addition to the video library and interactive materials as they become available. Instructors can
getting started sections, ebiodesign.org includes access our course syllabus, select presentation
additional content in the form of online appendices slides, and exam questions/answers via the Instructor
for many chapters. This is also where we’ll post Resources section of the site.
xiii
Focus on Value
What do we mean by “value” and why is it countries,4 it does not necessarily provide the best care
so important? to its citizens. In 2000, when the World Health Organiza-
tion ranked the health systems of its 191 member states
The escalation of healthcare costs is one of the major
for the first time ever, the US found itself in 37th pos-
economic and political issues of our time. The problem is
ition.5 In a more recent study that compared the US to
most apparent in the United States, where healthcare as a
Australia, Canada, Germany, the Netherlands, New Zea-
share of the economy has more than doubled over the
land, and the United Kingdom on measures of quality,
past 35 years. Spending on health accounted for 7.2
efficiency, access to care, equity, and the ability of citi-
percent of the nation’s gross domestic product (GDP) in
zens to lead long, healthy lives, America occupied last
1970, expanded to 16 percent in 2005, and is projected to
place. As the report pointed out, “While there is room for
be as high as 20 percent of GDP by 2015.1
improvement in every country, the US stands out for not
Simply put, the US economy cannot sustain this spend-
getting good value for its healthcare dollars.”6
ing trajectory, which has outpaced GDP growth for years
Against this backdrop, economists, researchers, and
(see Figure V1).2 The problem is not just straining the
policy makers alike have pointed to medical technology
federal budget: state and local governments have been
as a dominant factor driving increased health expend-
forced to reduce support for education, infrastructure,
itures in the US. Their estimates of the impact of tech-
and other critical expenditures as they struggle to fund
nical innovation on accelerating costs vary considerably,
Medicaid and other health programs. In the private
but some argue that new technologies and the proced-
sector, the cost of employment-based health insurance
ures that accompany them account for one-third to one-
is one of the main reasons workers have seen their wages
half of real long-term spending growth in healthcare.7 To
stagnate.3
be sure, many of these technologies have provided major
Despite the fact that the US spends two-and-a-half
advancements in health and longevity, ranging from
times more per capita on health than most developed
FIGURE V1
Indexes of US health expenditures
and GDP (excluding health
expenditures), per capita, adjusted
for inflation, 1977–2007 (compiled
based on National Health
Expenditure data, CMS.gov).
1
Focus on Value
diagnostic breakthroughs such as CT and MRI scanning developed countries such as the US, providers, hospitals,
to life-saving surgical and interventional therapies for the clinics, and (in some cases) payers are consolidating to
heart and brain. Increasingly, however, even revolution- achieve economies of scale and organization. Value-
ary developments such as these are being weighed based payment models are emerging. And purchasing
against the unsustainable rise in healthcare costs. managers and executives are playing a more central role
Since the birth of the modern medtech industry in the in deciding which medical technologies to adopt, with
mid-twentieth century, the majority of medical technol- physicians influencing, rather than dictating, those
ogy companies pursued a philosophy that has been choices. In developing countries, health systems recog-
described as “progress at any price.”8 Innovators and nize they are facing increased demand for medical tech-
companies were focused on developing new products nologies but are actively pursuing more affordable, cost-
that resulted in improved clinical outcomes, almost effective products and services designed specifically to
regardless of their associated cost. In some cases, this address the needs of patients and providers in settings
meant simply making marginal enhancements in order to with fewer resources. In other words, around the world,
sell a next-generation technology at a higher price. These the need for medical technologies that deliver clear value
strategies were successful for many years because the to their intended users has never been more imperative.
fee-for-service payment system in the US largely The concept of value is widely understood in general
uncoupled the providers, who make the treatment deci- terms, but is more difficult to articulate as a concept to be
sions, from the payers, who bear the costs of their considered throughout the biodesign innovation process.
choices. In this way, the market forces that operate in Here are a few key points that resonate with us about
other sectors of the economy have not been effective in value and value creation:
maximizing the value of health technologies and services.
By spending trillions of dollars on new innovations, the • Value is an expression of the improvement(s) a new
US fueled the growth of the medical technology industry technology and its associated services offer relative to
and helped to foster a view that complex and expensive the incremental cost. Just because a new technology
technology was the hallmark of superior healthcare. provides an improvement doesn’t mean it will
While the US has been hardest hit by uncontrolled create value.
health spending, it certainly is not alone. The countries • Importantly, value is not realized unless the cost/
in the European Union and Japan, which together with improvement equation is compelling enough – that is,
the US account for 75 percent of all medtech sales today,9 has enough marginal benefit over other available
have also been wrestling with how to manage mounting solutions – to cause decision makers to change their
healthcare costs. Moreover, as the middle class expands behavior and adopt the new technology.
in developing countries such as India, China, and Brazil, • We are in a period of transition with respect to who
these patients are demanding increased access to more the key decision makers are in the healthcare field.
advanced healthcare, potentially initiating the same In particular, purchasing power is shifting from
spiral of escalating health expenditures. In fact, these individual physicians to integrated health systems
issues are already emerging, with medical device sales and patients are becoming more knowledgeable
growing two- to five-times faster in these markets than in and active healthcare consumers. In the process,
developed countries.10 both of these audiences are demanding greater
Together these forces have launched a fundamental cost transparency.
shift in the healthcare sector. The affordability of care • In parallel, the assessment of value is evolving from
relative to its quality is now a primary focus in both being product specific to outcomes oriented. Stated
developed and developing markets. “Progress at any another way, decision makers are increasingly
price” is no longer a tenable strategy as health systems evaluating total solution offerings across an episode
universally place increasing emphasis on ensuring a of care rather than focusing on an individual
good value for the healthcare dollars they spend. In technology or service. Within this context, new types
2
Focus on Value
3
Focus on Value
• Value proposition – As the solution to a promising Former Senior Economist at the White House Council of
need begins to take shape, innovators can begin Economic Advisers
thinking about value in more concrete, concept- Victor Fuchs
specific terms. A value proposition describes the net Professor of Economics and Health Research and Policy
impact of the cost/improvement equation associated (emeritus), Stanford University
with a new offering in terms that are meaningful John Hernandez
to decision makers and sufficiently convincing to Vice President, Health Economics and Outcomes
elicit a change in their behavior. Value propositions Research, Abbott Vascular
form the core of a company’s sales and marketing Doug Owens
activities and become a source of its competitive Director of the Center for Health Policy, Stanford
advantage and differentiation (see chapters 5.7 University
and 5.9). Importantly, value propositions must Jan Pietzsch
be backed by strong evidence that resonates with President and CEO, Wing Tech Inc.
decision makers and the influencers that surround Consulting Associate Professor, Stanford University
them. In the new healthcare environment, value Bob Rebitzer
propositions increasingly require the company Consultant to the Clinical Excellence Research Center,
to share the risk of ensuring that the promised Stanford University
improvements and desired outcomes are realized Gordon Saul
at the stated cost. Executive Director of Biodesign, Stanford University
Christopher Wasden
These mechanisms for anchoring the biodesign innov-
Managing Director, US Healthcare Strategy and
ation process on value are broad and directional. We are Innovation Practice, PricewaterhouseCoopers
still in the early stages of what is clearly a profound shift
in the way medical technology innovation will address
NOTES
the economics of healthcare. But we hope that these
initial ideas, as well as the discussion of value that per- 1 “Snapshots: How Changes in Medical Technology Affect Health
meates the text, will serve as a useful starting point for Care Costs,” Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation, March 2, 2007,
innovators as they embrace this new paradigm in device http://kff.org/health-costs/issue-brief/snapshots-how-changes-
innovation. in-medical-technology-affect/ (March 25, 2014).
As with any major economic and social transforma- 2 Victor R. Fuchs, “New Priorities for Biomedical Innovation,” New
England Journal of Medicine, August 19, 2010, http://www.
tion, there are tremendous opportunities for those who
nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp0906597 (March 25, 2014).
can position themselves to understand and take advan-
3 Ibid.
tage of the changes. And the wonderful part about this 4 “Why is Health Spending in the United States so High?,” Health at
particular technology sector is that the innovators who a Glance 2011: OECD Indicators, Organization for Economic
are able to make the transition may have the opportunity Cooperation and Development, http://www.oecd.org/
to benefit millions of patients around the globe. unitedstates/49084355.pdf (March 25, 2014).
5 “Health Systems: Improving Performance,” The World Health
Report, 2000, http://www.who.int/whr/2000/en/whr00_en.pdf
The biodesign working group on value (March 25, 2014).
6 “U.S. Ranks Last Among Seven Countries on Health System
Performance Based on Measures of Quality, Efficiency, Access,
Laurence Baker Equity, and Healthy Lives,” The Commonwealth Fund, June 23,
Chief of Health Services Research, Stanford University 2010, http://www.commonwealthfund.org/News/News-
Aaron (Ronnie) Chatterji Releases/2010/Jun/US-Ranks-Last-Among-Seven-Countries.aspx
Associate Professor, Duke University (March 25, 2014).
4
Focus on Value
7 For an example, see Sheila Smith, Joseph P. Newhouse, and 9 “Medical Device Growth in Emerging Markets: Lessons from
Mark Freeland, “Income, Insurance, and Technology: Why Other Industries,” In Vivo, June 2012, file:///C:/Users/Lyn/
Does Health Spending Outpace Economic Growth,” Health Downloads/
Affairs, September/October 2009, http://content.healthaffairs. Medical_device_growth_in_emerging_markets_InVivo_1206%
org/content/28/5/1276.full (April 29, 2014). 20(3).pdf (March 25, 2014).
8 Fuchs, op. cit. 10 Ibid.
5
Global Perspectives
A world of opportunity … the medtech sector has become much more diverse in
recent years as healthcare has become a global priority.
Although the United States and Europe remain global Inventors and companies in countries around the world
leaders in medical technology innovation, the story of are playing an increasingly important role in sourcing
FIGURE G1
A snapshot of health and health-related spending in select countries around the world (compiled
from The World Bank data, 2011).
7
Global Perspectives
ideas, designing and developing them into viable prod- from around the world.5 Ireland has developed into a
ucts and services, and introducing them into patient care. prominent medtech manufacturing center, serving eight
In parallel, device sales in developing countries are of the top 20 medtech multinationals6 and attracting new
expanding at a rapid pace. As the US and Europe both enterprises of all sizes.
sustain growth rates in the low single digits, medtech Of course, each region has its own unique challenges
revenues in countries such as India and China are fore- and opportunities. In the pages that follow, we have tried
cast to increase at a compound annual growth rate of to give innovators a flavor for this range of issues and
14 percent and 26 percent, respectively.1 possibilities by profiling six important medtech markets.
The global transformation of the medtech sector has Europe and Japan represent geographies outside of the
been driven by multiple, interrelated factors. In US with well-established device industries; India, China,
developed markets, health systems are actively seeking Latin America, and Africa represent those in which the
to slow health spending associated with medical tech- sector is still emerging. The purpose of these profiles is
nologies as they become more cost conscious and to provide a context for healthcare innovation in these
attuned to the value these products deliver. Moreover, locations, highlight some of the barriers that innovators
as the time, expense, and complexity of developing new may encounter in working there, and share tactics they
solutions in environments like the US continues to can utilize to increase their chances of success. We’re
increase, innovators are moving offshore and creating grateful to the experts who worked with us to develop
new innovation hubs in locations around the world.2 this valuable content.
In developing markets, disease profiles are shifting from Additionally, innovators will find significantly more
infectious to chronic conditions, which makes diagnostic global content through the remainder of the Biodesign
and device solutions a more important part of efforts to text. While the book is still grounded in what’s required
meet the healthcare needs of patients. Governments and to identify, invent, and implement a new medical tech-
private healthcare providers alike are increasing health- nology in the US, we expanded our treatment of other
related spending (see Figure G1). And innovators and com- markets through the inclusion of more global guidance,
panies in low-resource settings are becoming leaders in as well as case studies that feature innovators and com-
inventing more affordable solutions that enable care deliv- panies working across the globe.
ery in any setting and reduce (rather than increase) its cost.3 Global expansion in the medtech sector can make it
Medtech innovators can certainly find compelling possible for patients traditionally underserved by med-
opportunities in both environments. They can also benefit ical devices to benefit from advanced technologies in
from thinking more globally about how – and where – they new and different ways. With the global medtech market
source, develop, and sell their new solutions. While many on its way to $440 billion by 2018,7 a world of opportun-
innovators historically used a single market as their base, ity truly awaits medtech innovators and the patients they
got established, and then expanded into new markets in a are committed to helping.
serial manner, they can now take a more global approach
from the very beginning of the biodesign innovation pro-
NOTES
cess. Various regions in the world are moving into promin-
ence in different parts of the medtech innovation process. 1 “Global Market for Medical Devices, 4th Edition,” Kalorama
To take just a few examples: Israel is home to over 700 med- Report, 2013, http://www.kaloramainformation.com/Global-
ical device companies and leads the world in the medtech Medical-Devices-7546398/ (March 10, 2014).
2 “Medical Technology Innovation Scorecard: The Race for Global
patents filed per capita.4 It has become a hotbed of inven-
Leadership,” PricewaterhouseCoopers, 2011, http://download.
tion and incubation of medical technologies, with a robust
pwc.com/ie/pubs/2011_medical_technology_innovation_
start-up scene. Argentina, Brazil, and Chile have become scorecard_the_race_for_global_leadership_jan.pdf (March
leaders in conducting high-quality, yet affordable clinical 10, 2014).
trials for pharmaceutical and medical device companies 3 Ibid.
8
Global Perspectives
4 “How Did Israel Become a Hotbed for Medical Devices?,” Fierce 6 “Business in Ireland,” IDA Ireland, http://www.idaireland.com/
Medical Devices, August 14, 2013, http://www. business-in-ireland/life-sciences-medical-tec/ (January 27, 2014).
fiercemedicaldevices.com/story/how-did-israel-become-hotbed- 7 “Medtech Market to Achieve Global Sales of $440B by 2018,”
medical-devices/2013-08-14 (January 24, 2014). Evaluate press release, October 12, 2012, http://www.
5 “Climate Change in Latin America Makes for Successful Clinical evaluategroup.com/public/PressReleases/Medtech-Market-to-
Trials,” MEDPACE, http://www.medpace.com/pdf/ Achieve-Global-Sales-of-$440-Billion-by-2018.aspx (January
conductingtrialsinlatinamerica.pdf (March 10, 2014). 27, 2014).
9
Africa
10
Africa
medium-sized African economies such as Kenya, sustained adoption. For example, the Ministry of Health
Ethiopia, and Tanzania will become significant medtech within an African nation might decide to mandate the
growth drivers for the continent in the coming decades. use of auto-disable syringes within its public health
Total annual health expenditure in the continent was centers, and a large multilateral organization or NGO
estimated at US$117 billion in 2012, with roughly half of may agree to fund the initiative. However, successful
this amount funded by African governments and the scale-up may depend on getting buy-in from in-country
other half provided by private sources, including charit- healthcare providers treating patients in public hospitals.
able/aid organizations and out-of-pocket payments.19 Healthcare provider input is critical to the long-term
Although this spending is dramatically uneven across sustainability and use of the technology. Misalignment
countries (e.g., South Africa accounts for nearly 30 per- among healthcare stakeholders can also lead to products
cent of the total), there is substantial room for the med- being procured that are not appropriate for the local
tech industry to grow.20 Currently, many medtech setting. For instance, healthcare providers and patients
innovations are aimed at the “bottom-of-the-pyramid” in Africa can benefit from high-throughput diagnostic
population. This massive group is likely to see benefits technologies that can be deployed in central labs as well
from the growing community of non-governmental as rugged point-of-care tests that can be used in clinics
organizations (NGOs), governments, and entrepreneurs and healthcare centers in remote, rural areas. The chal-
devoting resources to address their health needs. To be lenge is to make sure that the equipment funded, pro-
well equipped for the future, innovators also need to cured, and deployed is appropriate for the setting of use,
prepare for Africa’s rising middle class, as this growing underscoring the importance of decision makers being in
population will lead to a bigger consumer market. Africa tune with local needs and requirements.
is on the cusp of transformative change, enabled, in part, Perhaps the greatest challenge of working in many
by innovations that improve access and quality at an parts of Africa is related to its limited physical infrastruc-
affordable cost. ture, which can hinder productivity and add consider-
able expense to medtech applications. Specifically,
Challenges supply chain issues such as transportation and power
Medtech innovators should be mindful that many Afri- are critical barriers to overcome. Where available, the
can markets are smaller, riskier, and therefore less power supply can be unreliable, prone to chronic
attractive for private companies (such as venture capital- outages, and expensive.21 Similarly, despite being the
ists) to invest in, especially without special incentives. main mode of transport for goods, roads are scarce; only
Additionally, since advanced medical technologies have one in three rural Africans has access to an all-season
been largely absent in many countries, innovators must road.22 Also, transportation costs in Africa can be costly;
demonstrate the long-term value of their technologies basic services can be twice as much as the world’s aver-
before adoption will be considered. Innovators and com- age.23 Air travel, essential to develop regional markets, is
panies working in Africa should expect to devote signifi- constrained by insufficient capacity. In fact, in many
cant time and resources to market-development instances, flying between African countries may involve
activities, such as awareness raising, demand generation, a connecting flight via the Middle East or Europe. The
comprehensive introduction strategies, and training of implications of these infrastructure challenges can be
healthcare providers. considerable, ranging from product stock-outs and
Another potential barrier is linked to the complex bottlenecks to lifesaving interventions failing to reach
interplay of healthcare stakeholders and decision makers patients in a timely manner.
in Africa. Often, “the people who choose, the people who The regulatory infrastructure for medical products is
use, and the people who pay the dues” for medical also nascent in Africa, with regulatory processes and
technologies are distinct and not always aligned. This requirements varying from country to country. Few Afri-
can result in products failing to achieve widespread or can countries have national regulatory agencies for
11
Global perspectives
medical devices24 although many have drug regulatory something unique and critical to the solution.
agencies. Some countries accept the regulatory approvals Historically, NGOs have provided knowledge of the
of Europe and the United States for devices. In most communities and technical capacity with minimal cost
instances, international approvals do not replace African to the private-sector partner. The involvement of
country policies; however, these approvals can often private-sector participants enhances the financial
allow for faster approval of a product for in-country viability of the innovation and can lead to more
use. It is important to note that the European CE mark sustainable results, sometimes tapping into market
and US Food and Drug Administration approval are forces to improve access and affordability.
intended for products used in environments within Governments offer broad decision-making authority
Europe and the United States. The settings of use in and the ability to align stakeholders around the
Africa may be drastically different, and innovators activities of the partnership. While public–private
should expect to conduct in-depth needs assessments as partnerships require diligence, cross-sector
well as in-country clinical studies to ensure that products cooperation is critical to creating the momentum
are appropriate for the place of use and acceptable for the needed to advance medical technologies in Africa. (See
people who will use them. 2.3 Stakeholder Analysis and 6.4 Alternate Pathways.)
3. Funding models require innovative thinking, too.
Tactics Innovations, even affordable ones, require
Although Africa can be a challenging place to work, substantial investment. Admittedly, traditional
opportunities abound for those interested in applying medtech funding sources such as venture capital are
appropriate, affordable medtech solutions to the contin- rare in Africa. But the climate for stimulating
ent’s vast health problems. As they tackle product devel- investment in an African-based manufacturer to
opment and commercialization, innovators will benefit produce medical device products for Africa is
from the following guidelines: improving. International agencies are increasingly
shifting their support to in-country, on-the-ground
1. It’s all about providing a complete solution. ventures and transitioning from aid to investment.25
Medical devices that are affordable, robust, easy to And governments, global donors doing in-country
use, and low maintenance are needed in Africa. work, and corporations seeking to enter or expand
Innovators can potentially make a huge impact by into Africa are playing interesting new roles. For
introducing fundamental – yet disruptive – health instance, a recent medtech collaboration in Africa
technologies that are appropriately designed for involved a large medtech multinational providing
Africa’s remote and low-resource settings. technology and product development support, an
Innovators must learn the unique regional needs NGO assisting with product validation and business
within the African context and address the ones model development, a local government agency
where essential clinical, infrastructure, economic, committing co-funding to the project, and a local
and ongoing support requirements can be met. (See entrepreneur leading the management of the
1.2 Needs Exploration, 2.5 Needs Selection, and 4.6 venture. “Funding,” in other words, can come in
Final Concept Selection.) many different forms. (See 6.3 Funding
2. Partnerships are key. Novel, creative collaborations Approaches.)
can provide medtech innovators with new pathways
to success and scale in Africa. Conditions are primed Good luck! Bahati nzuri! Sterkte! Nasiib wacan! ﺡﻅﺍ ﺱﻉﻱﺩﺍ
for governments, NGOs, and private businesses to Anurag Mairal
work together. Increasingly, these public–private Program Leader, Technology Solutions, PATH
partnerships are being formed to tackle health and Rachel Seeley
social issues in Africa. Each of the partners brings Information and Communications Specialist, PATH
12
Africa
theguardian.com/global-development/2013/jun/13/nigeria-
NOTES larger-population-us-2050 (January 29, 2014).
11 “The True Size of Africa,” The Economist, 2010, http://www.
1 “Thabo Mbeki’s Victory Speech,” BBC News, June 3, 1999,
economist.com/blogs/dailychart/2010/11/cartography (March
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/world/monitoring/360349.stm
20, 2014).
(March 20, 2014).
12 “Hospital Purchasing and Reimbursement for Medical Devices
2 “Main Drivers of Africa’s Economic Performance,” African
in Key Sub-Saharan African Markets,” op. cit.
Development Report 2012, African Development Bank Group,
13 Ibid.
http://www.afdb.org/fileadmin/uploads/afdb/Documents/
14 “Naziha Bagui, Mobile Money: The Best Route to the African
Publications/African%20Development%20Report%202012%
Consumer,” Infomineo.com, January 14, 2014, http://blog.
20-%20Main%20Drivers%20of%20Africa%E2%80%99s%
infomineo.com/2014/01/14/mobile-money-the-route-to-the-
20Economic%20Performance.pdf (March 20, 2014).
african-consumer/#more-530 (March 20, 2014).
3 “Hospital Purchasing and Reimbursement for Medical Devices
15 “Lions Go Digital: The Internet’s Transformative Potential in
in Key Sub-Saharan African Markets,” Frost & Sullivan, 2007,
Africa,” McKinsey & Company, November 2013, http://www.
http://www.frost.com/prod/servlet/frost-home.pag (July
mckinsey.com/insights/high_tech_telecoms_internet/
16, 2014).
lions_go_digital_the_internets_
4 “Annual Development Effectiveness Review,” African
transformative_potential_in_africa (March 20, 2014).
Development Bank, 2012, http://www.afdb.org/fileadmin/
16 Ibid.
uploads/afdb/Documents/Project-and-Operations/ADER%
17 “African Medical Device Market: Facts and Figures 2012,”
202012%20(En).pdf (March 20, 2014).
ReporterLinker.com press release, December 13, 2012, http://
5 Mthuli Ncube, Charles Leyeka Lufumpa, and Steve Kayizzi-
www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/african-medical-device-
Mugerwa, “The Middle of the Pyramid: Dynamics of the Middle
market-facts-and-figures-2012-183352861.html (March
Class in Africa,” African Development Bank, April 20, 2011,
20, 2014).
http://www.afdb.org/fileadmin/uploads/afdb/Documents/
18 Ibid.
Publications/The%20Middle%20of%20the%20Pyramid_The
19 Ibid.
%20Middle%20of%20the%20Pyramid.pdf (March 20, 2014).
20 Ibid.
6 “Africa Development Indicators,” The World Bank, 2013,
21 “Fact Sheet: The World Bank and Energy in Africa,” The World
https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/bitstream/handle/
Bank, http://go.worldbank.org/8VI6E7MRU0 (March
10986/13504/9780821396162.pdf?sequence=1 (March
20, 2014).
20, 2014).
22 “Transforming Africa’s Infrastructure,” The World Bank,
7 “Hospital Purchasing and Reimbursement for Medical Devices
November 12, 2009, http://go.worldbank.org/NGTDDHDDB0
in Key Sub-Saharan African Markets,” op. cit.
(March 20, 2014).
8 Ama de-Graft Aikins, Nigel Unwin, Charles Agyemang, Pascale
23 Ibid.
Allotey, Catherine Campbell, and Daniel Arhinful, “Tackling
24 “National Regulatory Agencies for Medical Devices: Africa
Africa’s Chronic Disease Burden: From the Local to the Global,”
Region,” World Health Organization, http://www.who.int/
Globalization and Health, 2010, http://www.
medical_devices/safety/NRA_Africa_Region.pdf
globalizationandhealth.com/content/6/1/5 (March 20, 2014).
(March, 2014).
9 “Raised Blood Pressure: Situation and Trends,” World Health
25 Bekele Geleta, “Investing in Africa: A Sustainable Means to End
Organization, http://www.who.int/gho/ncd/risk_factors/
Aid Dependency,” Devex, October 19, 2012, https://www.
blood_pressure_prevalence_text/en/index.html (March 20, 2014).
devex.com/en/news/investing-in-africa-a-sustainable-means-
10 Claire Provost, “Nigeria Expected to Have Larger Population
to-end-aid/79494 (March 20, 2014).
than U.S. by 2050,” The Guardian, June 13, 2013, http://www.
13
China
14
China
technologies such as imaging equipment and implants The most effective way to understand formal and
that are targeted at top-tier hospitals in urban settings, informal systems within China, and how they interact,
account for over 60 percent of the market.19 Among the is by developing a strategic network of relationships
top 10 medical technology manufacturers in China, seven within the country. For example, when seeking regula-
are foreign firms or joint ventures. Domestic players have tory approval for a device in China, the official require-
tended to function on a regional basis, selling lower-tech ments of the China Food and Drug Administration
devices in markets outside the major cities. However, (CFDA) stipulate that a company’s first meeting with
notable exceptions are emerging in certain product cat- the agency take place after it makes its submission. How-
egories. Coronary stents were first introduced on a large ever, informal pre-submissions meetings with CFDA offi-
scale in China by some of the top five multinational med- cials, which help to clarify clinical requirements and
tech companies, and they rapidly captured 70–80 percent streamline the review process, can be arranged for com-
market share.20 Within a few years, however, local com- panies with the right relationships. Such connections are
panies launched mid-tier alternatives that they offered at built through years of time and effort. Companies
prices 30–40 percent lower than their multinational com- entering China for the first time almost always must hire
petitors. As a result, they quickly took over the market. consultants and other experts who can lend subject
Today, local stent manufacturers dominate the market on matter expertise as well as the right relationships to a
a national scale.21 Ultrasound machines provide another project.
example of a product category where majority market Product distribution is another challenging area,
share is rapidly moving from multinationals to local Chi- where companies are rarely successful without extensive
22
nese manufacturers. On the whole, local companies are relationship building. China’s diverse and distributed
increasingly consolidating their operations, augmenting population must be accessed province by province. And
their product pipelines with new and acquired products, each area has unique government policies, adaptation of
and making inroads into mid-tech device sectors. the centralized tender process, and other local require-
ments that make the notion of a national sales and distri-
Challenges bution model completely impractical in China. Moreover,
Compared to the growth prospects they contend with in contracts are awarded, sales are made, and products are
other markets, many healthcare companies consider adopted based on the relationships that exist between
China to be a “bright spot” in the global healthcare distributors and the facilities and physicians they serve.
landscape.23 Indeed the country is rich with opportun- As some multinational companies have learned the hard
ities, but it is not a market to be entered without consid- way, replicating these relationships is not only cost pro-
erable thought and planning. hibitive, but virtually impossible. As a result, it’s not
One of the most challenging aspects of working in uncommon for large medtech companies seeking the
China is navigating the formal rules set forth by regula- broad dissemination of its products to partner with as
tors and other government agencies in parallel with the many as 2,000 regionally focused distributors – a
informal norms that are integral to making progress in daunting and costly necessity of doing business in the
the country. Informal requirements and the precedents country.
set by other companies on their way to market are When developing in-country relationships, companies
powerful forces with which innovators must contend. should expect to find competing priorities and conflicting
However, it can be difficult for innovators to know what signals from the stakeholders in their networks. While
customary behaviors are expected and how to balance this is common in any geography, the types of tensions
them against more formal rules and guidelines. As one that arise in China, at times, can be more sensitive and
innovator described, very little related to doing business potentially difficult to reconcile. For example, in the
in China is “black and white,” but is instead character- country, there is a history of payments that flow directly
ized by “shades of gray.” from drug and device companies to physicians and
15
Global perspectives
hospitals.24 In the wake of a high profile scandal involv- strong relationships with distributors, hospital
ing a multinational drug company, the central govern- administrators, CFDA officials, and municipal and
ment launched a new anti-corruption campaign that it central government officials in order to understand
hopes will contribute to changes in the behavior of multi- and mitigate important risks and reduce the time and
national corporations (which are at risk of greater scru- cost of getting to market in China. If innovators do
tiny relative to in-country and global anti-bribery laws), not already have useful connections that can help
as well as the activities of local drug and device com- them build a network, they should make it a priority
panies.25 Efforts such as these may help eliminate some to partner with local experts and/or consulting firms
of the tensions that firms experience when doing busi- that are experienced at navigating the medical device
ness in China. development and commercialization process in
On a different note, the protection of intellectual prop- China. (See 2.3 Stakeholder Analysis and 5.7
erty (IP) and trade secrets in China poses significant Marketing and Stakeholder Strategy.)
concern for medtech companies. According to the US 2. Proactively erect competitive barriers. Start-up
Embassy in Beijing, China has one of the world’s highest companies often focus on intellectual property
piracy rates, with counterfeit goods accounting for over protection as the main barrier to entry for their
20 percent of products sold in the country.26 Inadequate competition. In China, however, patents are not
enforcement of international laws governing IP rights easily enforced. Successful companies create novel
and a protectionist instinct by the government combine barriers to protect their competitive position. For
to hinder efforts to reduce IP infringement.27 Foreign com- instance, the CFDA allows companies seeking
panies traditionally have not had much success seeking regulatory approval for novel, innovative products to
redress for infringement in Chinese courts. That said, generate their own product testing standard, which
enforcement and reparations are starting to improve can become the established standard for other
as Chinese companies increasingly find themselves the companies that may seek to develop “me-too”
victims of IP theft. Innovators should be wary of taking products. Innovators can use this opportunity to
easily copied innovations into the Chinese market, unless erect regulatory barriers to entry to slow fast
they can erect other barriers to protect their assets (as followers. Distributor partnerships and successful
described below). tender bids can also function as barriers to entry.
Innovators in China must think carefully about their
potential positional and capability-based advantages
Tactics
and use them to protect against competition. (See 5.9
China is the proverbial 800-pound gorilla that cannot
Competitive Advantage and Business Strategy.)
be ignored when considering global markets. The
3. Consider the pros and cons of being an outsider.
continuation of economic and demographic trends,
Innovators working in China sometimes perceive
health-related reform, improvements in infrastructure,
that they are at a disadvantage to domestic
and significant interest in innovation all provide real
competitors. For example, local firms may enjoy an
opportunities to medtech companies.28 Successful execu-
advantage in the Chinese tender process, and some
tion can be challenging but rewarding.
observers believe they are favored in the Chinese
Given the many unknowns associated with working in
courts when it comes to patent infringement
the Chinese market, innovators and companies with an
litigation. Domestic products can also follow a
interest in China are advised to remember that:
separate pathway for regulatory and reimbursement
1. Relationships are key. As described, having an approval in China that may be faster and less
active and extensive network is essential to complex than the pathways available to foreign
successfully conducting business in the country. manufacturers. On the other hand, products from
Innovators interested in entering China will need foreign multinational brands are often perceived as
16
China
being higher quality than domestic products, which 10 “Health Expenditure Total (% of GDP),” World Bank, http://
allows them to command higher prices. Innovators data.worldbank.org/indicator/SH.XPD.TOTL.ZS (January
15, 2014).
should appreciate the advantages and disadvantages
11 OECD Health Data 2013 http://www.oecd.org/unitedstates/
to being an outsider working in China and take these
Briefing-Note-USA-2013.pdf (January 15, 2014).
factors into account in constructing a business 12 “Medical Device Market: China,” PRWeb, November 25, 2013,
strategy. (See 5.9 Competitive Advantage and http://www.prweb.com/releases/2013/11/prweb11367826.
Business Strategy.) htm (January 15, 2014)
13 “Medical Device Market: USA,” Espicom, February 19, 2014
(March 16, 2014).
Good luck! 好运
14 Blackburn, op. cit.
Christopher Shen
15 Ibid.
Executive Director, Singapore-Stanford Biodesign 16 “China’s New Health Plan Targets Vulnerable,” Bulletin of the
Consulting Assistant Professor of Medicine, Stanford World Health Organization, January 2010, http://www.who.
School of Medicine int/bulletin/volumes/88/1/10-010110/en/ (January 14, 2014).
17 Jamie Hartford, “The Medical Device Market in China,” Medical
Device and Diagnostic Industry, June 18, 2013 http://www.
mddionline.com/article/medical-device-market-china (January
NOTES
15, 2014).
1 “GDP Growth (Annual%),” The World Bank, 2012, http://data. 18 “Medical Device Market: China,” Reportbuyer.com press
worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.MKTP.KD.ZG (March 14, 2014). release, November 25, 2013, http://www.prweb.com/releases/
2 “China: Health Data,” The World Bank, http://data.worldbank. 2013/11/prweb11367826.htm (January 15, 2014).
org/indicator/NY.GDP.MKTP.CD (January 10, 2014). 19 Hartford, op. cit.
3 Helen W. Wang, “The Biggest Story of Our Time: The Rise of 20 Nicholas Donoghue et al., “Medical Device Growth in Emerging
China’s Middle Class,” Forbes, December 21, 2011, http://www. Markets: Lessons from Other Industries,” In Vivo, June 2012,
forbes.com/sites/helenwang/2011/12/21/the-biggest-story-of- http://www.elsevierbi.com/publications/in-vivo/30/6/
our-time-the-rise-of-chinas-middle-class/ (January 15, 2014). medical-device-growth-in-emerging-markets-lessons-from-
4 “China: Data,” The World Bank, http://data.worldbank.org/ other-industries (February 12, 2014).
country/china (January 15, 2014). 21 Ibid.
5 “China Urban Population Exceeds Rural for First Time,” 22 Ibid.
Bloomberg News, Jan 17, 2012 (January 10, 2014). 23 Franck Le Deu, Rajesh Parekh, Fangning Zhang, and Gaobo
6 “Population Growth Rate,” The World Bank, 2012, hhttp://data. Zhou, “Health Care in China: Entering ‘Uncharted Waters,’”
worldbank.org/indicator/SP.POP.GROW?page=6 (March McKinsey & Company, November 2012, http://www.mckinsey.
14, 2014). com/insights/health_systems_and_services/
7 “Median Age of the Population in China, India, Europe, and USA health_care_in_china_entering_uncharted_waters (January
from 1950–2100,” China Profile Data, June 12, 2011, http:// 14, 2014).
www.china-profile.com/data/fig_WPP2010_Median-Age.htm 24 Andrew Jack and Patti Waldmeir, “GSK China Probe Flags Up
(January 10, 2014). Wider Concerns,” The Financial Times, December 17, 2013,
8 “China’s Aging Population to Double by 2053,” China Daily, http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/ba26aa2c-6648-11e3-aa10-
October 23, 2012, http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/china/2012- 00144feabdc0.html#axzz2qPYpCP7c (January 14, 2014).
10/23/content_15837794.htm (January 10, 2014). 25 Ibid.
9 Bradley Blackburn, “‘World News’ Gets Answers on China: 26 “Intellectual Property Rights in China,” American International
Health Care,” ABC News, November 18, 2010, http://abcnews. Education Foundation, http://www.aief-usa.org/ipr/ipr_facts/
go.com/International/China/health-care-china-trails-developed- index.htm (January 10, 2014).
countries-world-news/story?id=12171915&singlePage=true 27 “Intellectual Property Rights in China,” loc. cit.
(January 13, 2014). 28 Le Deu, Parekh, Zhang, and Zhou, op. cit.
17
Europe
18
Europe
approximately US$68,000 per year, insurance is provided largest healthcare systems in the world, the National
by the public statutory health insurance scheme (SHI), Health Service (NHS), a universal coverage, single payer,
known in Germany as Gesetzliche Krankenversicherung integrated healthcare delivery system.31 Through the
(GKV). The rest of the population has the option of NHS, residents of the UK automatically receive health-
purchasing private health insurance plans, although a care that is largely free at the point of use. The NHS, via
full 85 percent opts to remain with SHI.20 In Germany, its trusts, operates hospitals, doctor’s offices, and other
a strict separation exists between payers (insurances/ related health services delivery channels, and doctors,
sickness funds) and healthcare service providers, with nurses, and other care providers are directly employed
many hospitals and all doctors’ offices privately owned by the agency.32 The medical device market in the UK is
and operated. However, service fees are determined via valued at about US$11 billion, making it the third largest
bargaining processes between the major healthcare insti- in Europe.33 The UK market for medical devices is pro-
tutions.21 Germany is also Europe’s largest medical jected to increase by 7.3 percent per annum to about
device market (at US$27 billion) and the third largest in US$14 billion by 2018.34 The market is predominantly
the world behind the US and Japan.22 Medical technol- import-led, with only 25 percent of domestic demand
ogy is a key industry in Germany, with substantial met through in-country manufacturing.35 Overall, spend-
employment, the highest total sales among European ing cuts in healthcare and an increasing focus on value-
countries, and a significant export rate that continues to based pricing put substantial pressure on manufacturers
grow at approximately 12 percent per year.23 of devices and pharmaceuticals to drive down costs.
France Challenges
France is Europe’s second-largest economy, with a GDP While the EU’s regulatory system for medical devices has
24
of US$2.6 trillion. Similar to a number of other coun- long been touted as innovation-friendly, decisions
tries in Europe, the government bears the majority of the related to reimbursement and payment for new devices
healthcare expenditure, with private payments account- can be more challenging. Coverage must be negotiated
25
ing for less than 24 percent in 2013. Universal medical separately with payers in each country. Structured and
coverage (couverture maladie universelle, or CMU) was centralized processes exist in a number of countries,
introduced in 2000, and all residents receive publicly including the UK, France, and Germany. In other coun-
financed healthcare.26 Ninety-two percent of the popula- tries, coverage is often decided at the regional level (e.g.,
tion also has access to complementary or supplementary in Italy) or is handled through less formalized negotiation
health insurance through employers or the govern- processes between manufacturers and payers. This can
ment.27 The French healthcare system has been lauded be burdensome to medtech companies, especially start-
for providing high-quality care at less than half the per- ups, and also requires a clear strategic and tactical focus.
capita health spending level as the United States.28 The Medical device reimbursement is still considered
French medical device market, which is the second big- favorable in a number of European countries, and some
gest in Europe (at US$15 billion), is the fifth-largest med- useful pathways exist for “innovation” or add-on pay-
tech market worldwide.29 However, despite its attractive ments for devices. For instance, Germany’s NUB (Neue
size, France is known to be challenging when it comes to Untersuchungs-und Behandlungsmethoden) system pro-
device commercialization. Domestically, French medical vides a mechanism for hospitals to receive reimburse-
technology companies excel in producing highly ment for some newly introduced devices,36 even though
advanced devices such as implants.30 it can be challenging to obtain a positive decision. How-
ever, there is a growing trend across countries towards
United Kingdom more cost-conscious decision making and higher barriers
The UK is Europe’s third largest economy by GDP, at for reimbursement. This change is evidenced by the
approximately US$2.4 trillion. It is home to the one of the significant growth of health technology assessment
19
Global perspectives
(HTA) programs across Europe that focus on balancing earlier market access of new technologies compared to
the two major health system objectives of outcome the US, based on different regulatory requirements; the
improvement and cost control.37 The UK launched this focus in Europe is on the demonstration of safety and
movement by establishing the National Institute for performance, as opposed to safety and clinical effective-
Health and Care Excellence (NICE) in 1999. NICE has ness in the United States. Europe’s rapidly aging popula-
since implemented methodologically rigorous assessment tion and its distinct clinical needs present another
processes that inform reimbursement decision making significant opportunity for medtech innovation. Finally,
based on cost-effectiveness assessments. For medtech economic growth in a number of European countries that
companies, this means an early focus is necessary to had limited healthcare resources in the past is creating
appreciate and collect the clinical and cost evidence that new market opportunities. For instance, the Russian
is required to win a favorable reimbursement decision. medical device market has gained increasing attention
This is costly, and also leads to the exclusion of technolo- by multinational medtech companies in recent years
gies that do not demonstrate sufficient “value” in terms of because of its size and growth potential, and the willing-
the specific healthcare system’s willingness-to-pay. ness of a portion of the population to pay out-of-pocket
Another challenge is the strain the recent financial for innovative new devices and procedures. Device sales
crisis has put on the economies and financial budgets of in Russia, currently at US$6 billion, are estimated to
many European countries since 2008. This has led, as experience a six-fold increase by 2020.38
noted, to a number of European countries reducing and/ In preparing to tackle the European market, innovators
or slowing expenditures on healthcare. These cuts dir- and companies are advised to devote considerable atten-
ectly impact available spending on medical technology tion to the following issues:
and have already led to substantial pressures on medical
device sales prices. 1. Appreciate country-specific differences. While
Further, historical, political, and socio-economic Europe is often seen and referred to as one market,
factors, as well as national laws that govern healthcare it in fact is not. Each country has its own healthcare
system design, are explicitly excluded from harmoniza- delivery system and payment systems, mostly
tion per the EU treaty. This exclusion has contributed to governed by national laws. This leads to a variety of
maintained differences between the structures of health- differences between individual countries’ healthcare
care delivery systems. As a result, innovators must systems, ranging from differences in qualifications
appreciate that healthcare delivery and medical practices and responsibilities of healthcare staff, to variations
vary among European countries, with implications to the in patient referral and flow patterns, clinical
use of medical technology. In addition to these structural practice, and the medtech value chain. In addition,
differences, pronounced variations exist in cultures, atti- patient preferences and specific needs may differ
tudes, and languages across European countries, which based on cultural and historic distinctions among
add complexity to the implementation of a comprehen- member states. Innovators should therefore be
sive market entry strategy. prepared to conduct a thorough stakeholder and
clinical needs analysis, starting with the major
Tactics individual medtech markets in Europe, including
In addition to its substantive market size, Europe is Germany, France, the UK, and Italy. Also,
especially attractive to innovators because many of its innovators should anticipate dealing with a
countries have highly advanced healthcare systems with diversity of languages and local regulations, which
experienced clinicians that tend to be open to innovation can be burdensome and requires careful planning.
and commonly are early adopters of new medical tech- (See 1.2 Needs Exploration, 2.3 Stakeholder
nologies. This is further supported by Europe’s regula- Analysis, 2.4 Market Analysis, and 2.5 Needs
tory system for medical devices, which often facilitates Selection.)
20
Europe
21
Global perspectives
17 “Germany,” The World Bank, http://data.worldbank.org/ 29 “Medical Device Market: France,” Espicom, 2014, http://www.
country/germany (February 13, 2014). espicom.com/france-medical-device-market (February
18 Ibid. 13, 2014).
19 David Green, Benedict Irvine, Emily Clarke, and Elliot Bidgood, 30 “France: Medical Device Industry,” Emergo Group, http://
“Healthcare Systems: Germany,” Civitas, 2013, http://www. www.emergogroup.com/resources/market-france (February
civitas.org.uk/nhs/download/germany.pdf (February 13, 2014). 21, 2014).
20 Ibid. 31 “The U.K. Healthcare System,” The Commonwealth Fund,
21 Ibid. 2013, http://www.commonwealthfund.org/Topics/
22 “What is Germany’s Secret? How the World Can Learn from a International-Health-Policy/Countries/United-Kingdom.aspx
Thriving Medtech Industry,” MMDI Online, May 30, 2012, (February 13, 2014).
http://www.mddionline.com/article/what-germany%E2% 32 Ibid.
80%99s-secret-how-world-can-learn-thriving-medtech-industry 33 “The Global Market for Medical Devices, 4th Edition,”
(February 13, 2014). Kalorama Information, May 2013, http://www.
23 “Industry Report Medtech 2013,” BVMed, March 2013, http:// kaloramainformation.com/Global-Medical-Devices-7546398/
www.bvmed.de/themen/medizinprodukteindustrie-1/CE- (March 10, 2014).
Kennzeichnung/article/2013-03-branchendarstellung-medtech- 34 “Medical Device Market: United Kingdom,” Espicom, 2014,
2013.html (February 13, 2014). http://www.espicom.com/uk-medical-device-market.html
24 “France,” The World Bank, http://data.worldbank.org/ (February 13, 2014).
country/france (February 16, 2014). 35 Ibid.
25 “France: Health Expenditure,” The World Bank, 2013, http:// 36 “ISPOR Global Healthcare Systems Roadmap,” International
data.worldbank.org/indicator/SH.XPD.PUBL (February Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research, April
13, 2014). 2011, http://www.ispor.org/htaroadmaps/germanymd.asp#4
26 “International Profiles of Healthcare Systems 2013,” (January 31, 2014).
Commonwealth Fund, 2013, http://www.commonwealthfund. 37 “Health Technology Assessment and Health Policy Making in
org/~/media/Files/Publications/Fund%20Report/2013/Nov/ Europe,” European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies
1717_Thomson_intl_profiles_hlt_care_sys_2013_v2.pdf Report, Studies Series No. 14, http://www.euro.who.int/
(February 13, 2014). __data/assets/pdf_file/0003/90426/E91922.pdf (January
27 Ibid. 31, 2014).
28 “Healthcare Lessons from France,” National Public Radio, 2008, 38 “Executive Guide to Doing Business in Russia,” Emergo Group,
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php? January 2013, http://www.emergogroup.com/resources/
storyId=92419273 (February 13, 2014). market-russia (February 21, 2014).
22
India
Background surgery for less than US$2,000 per patient, with out-
South Asia is generally considered to include Afghani- comes similar to those at US-based centers where the
stan, Bangladesh, Bhutan, India, Maldives, Nepal, Paki- price tag can exceed US$100,000.11 Similar examples
stan, and Sri Lanka. Over the past 20 years, the region exist for ophthalmology, oncology, nephrology, and OB-
has experienced robust economic growth, averaging GYN specialty hospitals in India.12 Some of the success-
6 percent per year.1 As a result, poverty rates have ful strategies employed by these healthcare centers
declined, with the percentage of South Asians living on include generating high volumes of patients, aggressively
less than US$1.25 per day decreasing from 61 percent to trimming procedure costs, and shifting tasks to lower-
36 percent between 1981 and 2008. While the region is skilled care providers.13
still home to approximately 44 percent of the developing Health insurance coverage is still relatively uncommon
world’s poor, growth and development in South Asia are in India, but its availability is improving. Estimates vary,
expected to continue.2 but as much as 25 percent of the population now has
The largest and most influential country in the region some form of health insurance,14 although a much
is India. With approximately 1.3 billion people, India is smaller percentage has full or substantial coverage. Both
the fourth largest global economy by purchasing power government and private insurers are working to increase
parity (PPP).3 India’s gross domestic product (GDP) access to insurance. Analysts estimate that almost half
reached nearly US$2 trillion in 2012,4 and it is expected the population will enjoy some level of health insurance
to continue increasing at a healthy rate as the country coverage by 2020.15 The National Rural Health Mission
further integrates into the global economy. Growth will (NRHM), which the Indian government rolled out in
also be driven by increased domestic demand as India’s 2005, will account for some of this increase. NRHM is
burgeoning middle class expands from roughly 50 million an ambitious and wide-ranging public health program
in 2007 to almost 600 million people between by 2025.5 that seeks to improve healthcare delivery in rural India.16
India’s healthcare system is plagued by low spending The Rashtriya Swasthya Bima Yojna (RSBY, translated as
levels. Healthcare expenditure per capita was only US$59 National Health Insurance Program) also strives to
in 2011.6 The country’s private and public sector com- increase health insurance access for families below the
bined spent only about 4 percent of GDP on healthcare in poverty line.17
2011,7 although the government is planning to increase its The recent increase in individual purchasing power is
share from 1.4 percent to 2.5 percent of GDP over the next important given the relative lack of health insurance
five years. In the past half-century, India’s public sector
8
coverage in India. Patients make approximately 70 per-
has steadily given up market share to the private sector in cent of total healthcare payments in the country.18
providing healthcare.9 Accordingly to one study, the pri- Accordingly, they tend to be highly sensitive to both
vate sector accounted for over 90 percent of all hospitals, the cost and value of the medical interventions they
85 percent of doctors, 80 percent of outpatient care, and receive. Many Indians are willing to commit their family
10
almost 60 percent of inpatient care. savings to high-impact, life-saving medical interventions
Fortunately, India’s private sector has been respon- such as the implantation of pacemakers or stents, but
sible for some remarkable innovations in healthcare may only be willing to spend minimally to address health
delivery. Several major hospital systems in the country issues and chronic conditions that they perceive to be
are able to deliver high-quality outcomes at a fraction of “optional” or non-life-threatening.19
the cost of care in developed country settings. For India’s medical device market is conservatively worth
instance, one cardiac care center offers open-heart more than US$3 billion.20 It is forecast to continue
23
Global perspectives
expanding at a compounded annual growth rate of over produced less expensively and offered to Indian custom-
15 percent through 2016,21 far better than the 2 to 3 ers at more affordable prices.25
percent growth anticipated for the sector in the United To date, many multinational companies have focused
States and Europe. As a result, many global medical largely on making capital equipment, such as imaging
technology companies view India as one of the most equipment and incubators, available within India. In
promising emerging markets for direct investment.22 Sev- contrast, local medical technology companies have trad-
eral of the largest multinational companies in medical itionally concentrated on low-cost offerings such as med-
technology have invested in large product development ical supplies and consumables (sutures, catheters) that
centers in India to develop solutions suited for the local allow them to take advantage of inexpensive labor and
market. These product development centers are also cre- manufacturing costs but do not require extensive
ating examples of reverse innovation. For instance, some research and development.26
of these locally developed products, such as inexpensive State-of-the-art Indian secondary and tertiary care
blood glucose meters, have been launched in developed institutions, which attract both domestic patients who
markets with great success. can afford their world-class services as well as hundreds
Another factor affecting the demand for medical tech- of thousands of medical tourists each year,27 are benefit-
nologies in India is the growing prevalence of chronic ting from the innovative medical technologies that are
diseases, linked to increased longevity, greater urban- imported into the country. However, most of the Indian
ization, and shifting lifestyle choices within the popula- population is served by healthcare facilities without
tion. Communicable diseases such as malaria and adequate resources, staff, or capacity to access these
tuberculosis and tropical diseases such as Japanese products. And, unfortunately, the vast majority of
encephalitis and dengue fever traditionally represented imported medical technology products may not appropri-
a large proportion of India’s disease profile. However, ately address their needs. Some are too expensive to be
coronary heart disease, diabetes, asthma, and other made widely available. Others do not function depend-
chronic non-communicable diseases are significantly ably in areas with unreliable power or other infrastruc-
increasing in prevalence. For example, analysts pre- ture challenges. Still others may be too technically
dicted that Indians would account for some 60 percent complex or resource-intensive to operate or maintain
of the world’s heart patients by 2010.23 While this trend by healthcare workers who are under-trained relative to
poses challenges for the country’s healthcare system, it staff in top-tier facilities.
also presents significant opportunities for medical Although medical technologies are still largely under-
device companies with products that treat these condi- utilized across the country, India has developed a large,
tions. However, Indian patients will have to be con- well-established clinical trial industry led by the phar-
vinced of the value of paying for treatments to address maceutical industry. Clinical testing in the country can
such chronic conditions. be as little as one-twentieth the cost of conducting trials
elsewhere.28 However, at the time of this writing, new
Challenges restrictions put in place by the Indian Supreme Court
Despite the promise India offers as an emerging medical in 2013 have stalled most clinical trial activity in the
technology market, there are still relatively few examples country.29 These restrictions enforce stricter monitoring
of innovative medical technologies that have been and what critics perceive to be unreasonable require-
adopted on a large scale across the country. Imports from ments for compensating patients for research injuries or
medical technology companies dominate the medical death.30 The long-term effects of these changes remain to
technology sector, accounting for approximately 80 per- be seen, but some observers of the medical technology
24
cent of the value of all devices sold within India. Some and pharmaceutical industries anticipate that they will
companies have created products that are simplified ver- significantly reduce the number of trials conducted in
sions of products sold in Western markets that can be India and, in turn, the availability of new treatments.31
24
India
Distribution is another variable in scaling the adoption ground clinical immersion is essential to
of innovative medical technologies beyond India’s pre- understanding India’s heterogeneous nature and
mium healthcare settings in large urban centers. Distri- what is truly required to more fully address the
bution networks for medical products are fragmented by needs of segments of its diverse population.
region, medical specialty, and product category. The dis- Investigate problems and opportunities across
tributors serve an important role in that they often have geographic regions (north, south, east, and west) –
deep relationships with healthcare providers, especially needs can be considerably different depending on
in areas of the country where sales representatives of the the area. The same applies for urban versus rural
medical device companies do not have relationships. settings, public versus private centers, and different
Further, distributors may extend credit with favorable socioeconomic classes. (See 1.2 Needs Exploration,
terms to smaller hospitals or physicians operating com- 2.4 Market Analysis, and 2.5 Needs Selection.)
munity clinics and surgery centers. 2. Go deep on stakeholder analysis. India’s
Equally as important as figuring out how to physically stakeholder landscape is significantly different than
sell and distribute a product in India, is devising a way to what innovators traditionally encounter in more
do so on a sustainable basis. Given the extreme require- developed markets. For instance, a low-skilled health
ment for more affordable medical technologies in the worker or a family caregiver in India may perform
country, innovators and companies often struggle if they procedures usually performed by a physician or
rely on traditional business models for generating skilled nurse in a developed market. Carefully
revenue. Accordingly, business model innovation – or understand the interests of all those involved in the
coming up with new and different ways to engage cycle of care, flow of money, and medical technology
with stakeholders in the healthcare value chain, align ecosystem to identify advocates and anticipate
their incentives, and realize a financial return – is becom- resistance. Pay attention to the many different levels
ing paramount to success in India’s medical technology of care providers, the multi-faceted medical
sector. The problem is that business model innovation is technology value chain, and to the extensive role of
difficult and can add considerably to the resource patients and their families in making care decisions.
requirements for a medical technology innovation (See 2.3 Stakeholder Analysis.)
project. 3. Keep innovating beyond the technology. With few
rules or precedents to follow, innovators have no
choice but to become creative; not just with the
Tactics
products they design and develop, but with the
The current market characteristics and barriers combine
business strategies they craft to support their
to make the Indian market a distinctive opportunity for
commercialization. Use your deep understanding of
medical technology innovation. Not only is the country’s
the need and the relevant stakeholders to enable
large and growing population in need of more inventive,
successful business model innovation, unique
appropriate solutions to common medical problems, but
partnerships, and other non-traditional approaches
products and services that work in India may also be
with the potential to overcome common barriers.
relevant in other markets such as Eastern Europe, the
And don’t be afraid to experiment. In India,
Middle East, and Africa.
creativity is a necessity that has spawned many
Innovators and companies choosing to target this
advances, such as financing schemes for more
market will face challenging conditions, to be sure. There
expensive interventions and mobile clinics and
are a few key issues related to the biodesign innovation
transport solutions to increase access to essential
process that deserve special emphasis:
medical services in remote rural areas, to name a
1. Search for needs in country. Don’t try to import few. (See 4.4 Business Models and 5.8 Sales and
needs (or their solutions) into the market. On-the- Distribution Strategy.)
25
Global perspectives
NOTES %20NEW/PDFs/
778886_India_Pharma_2020_Propelling_Access_
1 “South Asia Overview,” The World Bank, http://www. and_Acceptance_Realising_True_Potential.ashx (March
worldbank.org/en/region/sar/overview (January 3, 2014). 7, 2014).
2 Ibid. 16 Deoki Nandan, “National Rural Health Mission: Turning into
3 “Country Comparison: GDP (Purchasing Power Parity),” The Reality,” Indian Journal of Community Medicine, vol. 35, no. 4,
World Factbook, Central Intelligence Agency, 2012, https:// 2010, pp. 453–4. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/
www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/ PMC3026119/ (March 7, 2014).
rankorder/2001rank.html?countryname=India&countrycode= 17 Nagesh Prabhu, “Rashtriya Swasthya Bima Yojana for BPL
in®ionCode=sas&rank=4#in (January 3, 2014). families too,” The Hindu, July 8, 2013, http://www.thehindu.
4 “GDP (Current US$),” The World Bank, 2012, http://data. com/news/national/karnataka/rashtriya-swasthya-bima-
worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.MKTP.CD (January 3, 2014). yojana-for-bpl-families-too/article4892098.ece (March 7, 2014).
5 “Taking Advantage of the Medtech Market Potential in India,” 18 “Health Financing: Private Expenditures on Health as a
PricewaterhouseCoopers, 2012, pg. 4 http://www.pwc.com/ Percentage of Total Expenditures on Health,” World Health
mx/es/industrias/archivo/2012-09-taking-advantage-india.pdf Organization, 2011, http://gamapserver.who.int/gho/
(January 3, 2014). interactive_charts/health_financing/atlas.html?
6 “Health Expenditure Per Capita” The World Bank, 2012, http:// indicator=i2&date=2011 (October 2, 2013).
data.worldbank.org/indicator/SH.XPD.PCAP (March 14, 2014). 19 “Taking Advantage of the Medtech Market Potential in India,”
7 “Health Expenditure, Total (% of GDP),” The World Bank, op. cit.
2012, http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SH.XPD.TOTL.ZS 20 Ibid.
(February 14, 2014). 21 “Medical Devices Market in India May Grow to $5.8 Billion by
8 “Healthcare Spending to Rise to 2.5 Percent,” Indian Express, 2014: Report,” BioSpectrum, October 3, 2013, http://www.
March 1, 2012, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/ biospectrumasia.com/biospectrum/news/197400/medical-
healthcare-spend-to-rise-to-2.5-of-gdp/918380 (March 7, 2014). devices-market-india-grow-usd58-billion-2014-report#.
9 Ramya Kannan, “More People Opting for Private Healthcare,” UxoIqPldV8E (March 7, 2014).
The Hindu, August 1, 2013, http://www.thehindu.com/sci- 22 “Taking Advantage of the Medtech Market Potential in India,”
tech/health/policy-and-issues/more-people-opting-for-private- op. cit.
healthcare/article4967288.ece (March 7, 2014). 23 David Kohn, “Getting to the Heart of the Matter in India,” The
10 “Private Sector in Healthcare Delivery in India,” National Lancet, August 16, 2008, http://www.thelancet.com/journals/
Commission on Macroeconomics and Health, 2005, pg. 5 lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(08)61217-9/fulltext (January
http://www.who.int/macrohealth/action/Report%20of% 3, 2014).
20the%20National%20Commission.pdf (March 7, 2014). 24 “India Medical Device Consulting,” Pacific Bridge Medical,
11 Ketaki Ghokhale, “Heart Surgery in India for $1,583 Costs http://www.pacificbridgemedical.com/business-services/
$106,385 in U.S.,” Bloomberg News, July 28, 2013, http:// medical-device-consulting/india/ (January 3, 2014).
www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-07-28/heart-surgery-in- 25 “Taking Advantage of the Medtech Market Potential in India,”
india-for-1-583-costs-106-385-in-u-s-.html (February 12, 2014). op. cit.
12 Vijay Govindrajan and Ravi Ramamurti, “Delivering World- 26 “The Medical Device Market: India,” op. cit.
Class Healthcare Affordably,” Harvard Business Review, 27 “Stricter Rules Driving Away Medical Tourism from India,” The
November 2013, http://www.aravind.org/ Economic Times, August 15, 2013, http://articles.
aravindcontentmanagement/file/MF00000053.pdf (February economictimes.indiatimes.com/2013-08-15/news/
12, 2014). 41413559_1_apollo-hospitals-prathap-c-reddy-overseas-
13 Ibid. patients (October 3, 2013).
14 “Government Sponsored Health Insurance in India: Are You 28 Kenan Machado, “New Restrictions Stall Drug Trials in India,”
Covered?,” The World Bank, October 11, 2012, http://www. Wall Street Journal India, January 28, 2014, http://blogs.wsj.
26
India
27
Japan
28
Japan
diagnostic devices, particularly imaging, while most since 2009, aspects of the approval process have been
innovative therapeutics are imported. clarified, and more frequent consultation on regulatory
submissions is now allowed. However, despite these
Challenges changes, PMDA remains understaffed. In addition,
Although Japan is a large, stable market that is receptive review times for priority devices are only just catching
to advanced technology, it is frequently considered to be up to the US FDA, while non-priority devices can take up
the most difficult Asian market to enter.19 Many innov- to 2 years longer.20 Such barriers have led to a well-
ators are challenged by the language barrier since not all documented “device lag” that delays product launches
forms and guidelines are readily available in other lan- in the country and prevents Japanese patients from bene-
guages. They also may find certain processes to be com- fiting from the world’s most advanced diagnostics and
plex and laden with “hidden” costs. For instance, to help devices in a timely manner.
them navigate the path to market, foreign companies An additional factor that can make Japan a difficult
must engage with a Marketing Authorization Holder environment for medtech innovation is that the country
(MAH). In addition to assisting with the regulatory pro- does not have a strong history of entrepreneurship in the
cess, the MAH helps facilitate distribution, which typic- healthcare sector. Japan’s leading examples of entrepre-
ally involves a primary distributor that works through a neurship exist almost exclusively in high-technology.
network of secondary distributors. Each of these external Culturally, Japanese society is still not widely accepting
parties must be managed, and also requires a commis- of mistakes and failure, which discourages the risk-
sion on product sales. Similarly, when conducting clin- taking behavior that is required to create start-up com-
ical trials in Japan, physicians tend to be less directly panies. The country is admired for its commitment to
involved in data collection than their counterparts in the research and development, devoting a higher percentage
US and Europe, and experienced clinical research coord- of GDP to this activity than all other countries except
inators are scarce. Accordingly, companies often must Israel.21 Yet, relatively few Japanese innovations are
depend on contract research organizations (CROs) to transformed into viable businesses.22 Of those individ-
play a much more active, hands-on role in their Japanese uals and teams that do decide to launch new companies,
trials, incurring significantly higher costs in the process. most have a tendency to “play it safe” by pursuing incre-
These costs are offset to some extent by the relatively mental improvements and “me too” technologies.
high reimbursement rates traditionally authorized by Regardless, they often have difficulty recruiting engineer-
Japan’s Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare. How- ing talent, as few people are willing to leave large, stable
ever, this entity is working to bring reimbursement in organizations to join a start-up. As a result, in-country
Japan into closer alignment with reimbursement levels in medtech innovators have trouble finding experienced
the US. It has also has begun reevaluating payment levels mentors to help guide them. Innovators and companies
for medical devices every two years as part of its cost seeking to enter Japan with innovative new medical
reduction efforts. These activities will diminish this products also feel the effects of this problem. With few
advantage to companies over time. start-ups founded within the country and many larger
Device regulation through the country’s Pharmaceut- organizations able to leverage partnerships and resources
icals and Medical Devices Agency (PMDA) provides developed in the high-tech and electronic sectors, the
another example of where companies often struggle. This medtech ecosystem in Japan is still in its infancy.
agency traditionally has been known for its rigid stand-
ards, lengthy approval processes, and requirements for Tactics
extensive documentation. The PMDA recently enacted A survey conducted by the American Medical Devices
reforms focused on encouraging medtech innovation and Diagnostics Manufacturers’ Association (AMDD)
and decreasing the time to approval for novel devices. revealed that 85 percent of Japanese people desire faster
The number of reviewers at the PMDA has been tripled access to the world’s most advanced medical
29
Global perspectives
technologies, and 66 percent of respondents indicated almost all innovative devices are able to secure local
that they favor these technologies even if they cost reimbursement within three to six months following
slightly more.23 The government is also supportive, PMDA approval. (See 4.2 Regulatory Basics and 5.4
having recently established an Office for Health Care Regulatory Strategy.)
and Medical Strategy that is focused on helping drive 3. Getting down to business can be burdensome.
the development and commercialization of more medical Medtech specific activities such as filing a patent,
technologies from the country’s investment in R&D. The running clinical trials, and seeking regulatory
prime minister has further designated the medtech approval can all require additional effort and
industry as one of three strategic sectors that will revital- expense when working in Japan. In addition, Japan
ize the country’s economy. Against this backdrop, Japan is ranked 122 out of 189 economies when it comes to
is ripe for medtech innovation from outside and within. the time and cost involved in launching a business in
In preparing to tackle the Japanese market, innovators the country.25 In combination, innovators must take
and should pay specific attention to these factors: these factors into account as they develop their plans
and timelines to get to market, and also as they
1. Credibility matters. In Japan’s hierarchical society,
prepare to raise the funding necessary to support
it can be difficult for innovators and start-up
their in-country efforts. (See 6.1 Operating Plan and
companies to make progress on multiple fronts
Financial Model and 6.3 Funding Approaches.)
without the support or involvement of a well-known
doctor, leading academic connection, or strong Good luck! 幸運
corporate and/or government backing. The Fumiaki Ikeno
repercussions of this issue are felt throughout the Research Associate, Cardiovascular Medicine, Stanford
biodesign innovation process, from gaining access to University
hospitals and physicians, through identifying sources Global Product Development Partnership (PDP) Liaison,
of funding. Innovators with prestigious in-country Stanford Biodesign
connections should actively seek to leverage them.
While there is no easy solution for those without,
NOTES
they should anticipate potential resistance and think
creatively about workarounds until they are able 1 “Japan Indicators,” The World Bank, 2012, http://data.
to build desired relationships. (See 2.3 Stakeholder worldbank.org/country/japan (January 14, 2014).
Analysis and 5.7 Marketing and Stakeholder 2 “Japan GDP Growth Forecast 2013–2015,” Knoema, 2013 http://
knoema.com/igsdjtg/japan-gdp-growth-forecast-2013-2015-and-
Strategy.)
up-to-2060-data-and-charts (January 14, 2014).
2. When it comes to regulation, plan ahead. Given the
3 “Japan Overview,” Encyclopedia of the Nations, http://www.
Japanese device lag, begin thinking about an in- nationsencyclopedia.com/economies/Asia-and-the-Pacific/
country regulatory strategy relatively early. Choosing Japan-OVERVIEW-OF-ECONOMY.html (January 14, 2014).
the right MAH is essential to the regulatory process, 4 “Japan Indicators,” The World Bank, 2012, http://data.
so innovators should seek referrals and screen these worldbank.org/country/japan (January 14, 2014).
5 “Japan’s Population Logs Record Drop,” CBC News, January 2,
prospective partners carefully. Additionally,
2013, http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/story/2013/01/02/
innovators are advised to take advantage of the many
japan-population-record-decline.html (January 14, 2014).
consultation sessions offered by PDMA. These 6 Ibid.
meetings can be costly (up to US$28,000 for a two- 7 “Causes of Death,” Japanese Ministry of Health Data, http://
hour meeting), but the feedback is reliable, making www.mhlw.go.jp/toukei/saikin/hw/jinkou/geppo/nengai11/
24 kekka03.html#k3_2 (January 14, 2014).
the sessions a valuable investment. Although
medtech regulation in Japan can be a challenge, the 8 “Healthcare in Japan,” The Economist, September 12, 2011,
http://www.economist.com/node/21528660 (January
good news is that review times are getting shorter and
14, 2014).
30
Japan
31
Latin America
32
Latin America
multinational companies. The local companies mostly Baja California. The domestic medtech industry in
manufacture low-to-mid complexity, less expensive med- Mexico is geared towards exports, with the United States
ical devices, while most high-end, expensive devices are as the dominant destination. The local markets, on the
imported. Medical devices are regulated by the Brazil other hand, are predominantly supplied by imports. In
national health surveillance agency called Agência Nacio- combination, these factors make Mexico both the leading
nal de Vigilância Sanitária (ANVISA), which has require- medical device exporter and importer in Latin America.29
ments similar to those found in the European Union. The Mexican regulatory agency, Subsecretaría de Regu-
lación y Fomento Sanitario of the Secretaría de Salud
Mexico (SSA), through a division known as COFEPRIS, follows
Mexico is the largest Spanish-speaking country in the similar guidelines to the US FDA and works in cooper-
world, with a population of about 121 million people.21 ation with that agency.30
With a GDP of US$1.1 trillion, it has the second largest
economy in the region.22 Its proximity to the United Barriers
States makes it an attractive market for many medtech Economic growth and development in Latin America has
companies. Health expenditure is low compared to other been undeniably robust over the last decade, making it a
Latin American countries – the World Bank estimates compelling geographic target for medtech innovators.
that Mexico spends 6.3 percent of GDP on healthcare,23 However, as with any emerging market, the region is not
with public expenditure accounting for about 50 percent without its challenges. For one, the countries that comprise
of the total.24 Most private spending is out-of-pocket, as Latin America are incredibly diverse, offering significantly
private insurance companies represent a small propor- different levels of opportunity, stability, productivity, and
tion of the healthcare market.25 competitiveness to the companies that do business within
Healthcare provision varies widely across Mexico. The them. On the World Economic Forum’s 2013–24 Global
largest public hospitals and private facilities are generally Competitiveness Index, Chile was a top performer, ranked
well equipped and staffed, with private hospitals in 34th out of 148 countries, while Venezuela received the
Mexico City catering to upper-middle class locals and lowest ranking at 134th (Mexico and Brazil earned the 55th
medical tourists. However, the country’s overall hospital and 56th positions on the report).31
infrastructure is underdeveloped, with only one hospital Despite this wide-ranging performance, many coun-
bed per 1,000 people in 2013, less than half the rate of tries in Latin America struggle with common factors that
provision in Argentina, Brazil, or Chile.26 Smaller, more limit their competitiveness by international standards.
remote facilities are in great need of upgraded and For example, multiple countries within the region,
expanded equipment. including Brazil and Mexico, have persistent problems
Mexico is the second largest medical device market in related to the overall quality of their physical infrastruc-
Latin America, at about US$4 billion.27 It has become an tures. Government efficiency, corruption, and security
important medical device manufacturing base for multi- are also common concerns.32 Another important issue
nationals due to its Maquiladora program, under which relates to the smooth, transparent functioning of many
manufacturers can bring in components, parts, or even major institutions, including the regulatory bodies that
capital equipment from the US free of import duties due play a critical role in the medtech field. Brazil and Mexico
to the North American Free Trade Agreement have the most mature and stable regulatory systems in
(NAFTA).28 Geographical proximity to the United States the region, but requirements for market entry can still be
and a less expensive cost of labor encourages many somewhat confusing and excessively bureaucratic. For
American medical device companies to set up manufac- instance, gaining regulatory approval in Brazil through
turing facilities in Mexico or use third-party manufactur- ANVISA can take from six months to two years, with
ing services provided by local companies. Maquiladora unexplained delays often slowing licensing, registration,
activity concentrates along the US border in the state of and review processes.33 According to one report,
33
Global perspectives
bureaucracy and corruption costs Brazil over US$40 bil- destination, and they should keep these three inter-
lion each year.34 related factors in mind when doing so:
Intellectual property (IP) protection is another area
where Latin America’s institutions have room for continued 1. Conduct an in-market experiment. Innovators who
improvement. In contrast to the United States and Europe, are uncertain whether Latin America is the right
Latin America does not have a longstanding tradition of market to enter with a product should consider
protecting IP rights. In recent years, the region has made gaining some experience in the region before making
significant strides in adopting legal reforms and aligning its up their minds. For example, Argentina, Brazil, and
IP policies with those advocated by international agencies Chile have developed vibrant industries focused on
such as United States Patent and Trademark Office, the conducting clinical trials for pharmaceutical and
European Patent Office, and the World Intellectual Property medical device companies from around the world.
Organization. However, piracy and enforcement remain The advantages of conducting trials in the region
ongoing challenges.35 In some countries, other hurdles include lower costs, faster enrollment, rates strong
exist. For example, in Brazil, any patent application for patient retention, competent and enthusiastic
products affecting “public health” must first be approved investigators, and compliance with Good Clinical
by ANVISA before it can be examined on its merits by the Practices (GCPs).42 Similarly, locations such as
in-country patent office. This extra requirement, known as Mexico are well known for their medtech contract
“prior consent,” can add significant time, cost, and risk to manufacturing capabilities. Baja California alone has
the patent applications of pharmaceutical and medical tech- more than 65 facilities devoted manufacturing ISO,
nology companies.36 Other Latin American countries such FDA, and CE-mark certified medical devices.43 Costa
as Paraguay also follow prior consent rules.37 Rica is another manufacturing hub, with medtech
Finally, Latin America suffers from uneven quality in exports expanding at a compound annual growth
its educational systems, which contributes to a scarcity of rate of 24 percent since 1998. Products produced in
skilled workers in high technology fields such as medical the country range from high-tech devices for
device development. This, in turn, limits the extent of multinationals to low-end disposables.44 Starting
innovation being generated from within the region. For with a small trial or manufacturing project can be an
instance, despite a thriving medical device manufactur- effective way to gain exposure to Latin America and
ing sector in Mexico,38 few domestic companies are begin cultivating relationships in markets that may
developing innovative medical solutions specifically for be of interest at a later date. (See 5.2 R&D Strategy
the Latin American market. Similarly, entrepreneurship and 5.3 Clinical Strategy.)
is an important driver of the economy – small businesses 2. Establish a beachhead from which to expand.
employ over half of all workers. But these businesses When innovators are ready to tackle Latin America
often fail to grow into large, sustainable enterprises.39 as a market, thinking about the region as a whole
can be intimidating. A more effective approach is to
Tactics establish a foundation in a single market from which
Large multinational corporations have been selling med- the company can grow. Brazil or Mexico, with their
ical technologies in Latin America for more than 50 large economies and more established medical
years, but relatively few start-ups have targeted the device markets, can serve as an excellent starting
region with their offerings.40 Latin America is large, point. For US-based innovators, Mexico offers great
growing, and full of opportunity. And, according to proximity, regulatory requirements that are
some, it may be a less complicated, more approachable becoming harmonized with those of the FDA, and a
market for young medtech companies to enter than other base from which to enter other Spanish-speaking
emerging markets, such as China.41 Innovators are well countries.45 Brazil encourages companies to
served to consider Latin America as a potential business establish operations in the country by offering a
34
Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
"Quite certain," was the mournful reply.
"He can hardly know it, or—or I should not have found
you here alone. But he will be sure to know it before the
morning; evil tidings fly on swift wings."
CHAPTER XV.
ONWARDS.
"We were all on our way to the high road," said Marco,
"when some one proposed that instead of following the
bend of the river, it would be well for one or two of our
party to cross it, so that by making a round to the left, we
might come on the travelers from behind, while the rest
attacked them in front. Enrico and I had orders to cross.
"Ay, ay," said Marco, following him with his eyes; "if
ever one brother loved another, that brother was Raphael.
He is always teaching and preaching about submission, but
I take it that when it comes to a sharp, sudden trial like
this, the heretic's faith and trust will be whirled away, like
that poor struggling wretch who has just been dashed to
pieces over the fall. It was an awful sight, even to one used
like myself to rough work," added the bandit, wiping his
brow; "and often when I stand sentry within sound of that
deathly cataract, I shall fancy that I hear again the last cry
of the miserable Enrico."
"He will come when he has done his business," was the
surly reply. "The sun has nearly sunk behind the hills, but
the expected party have not yet appeared. The band will
keep on the watch, and perhaps pass the night in the
woods. I am appointed sentinel at the rock-pass till they
return, and I have come to fill my wallet and my flask, as it
is uncertain how many hours I may have to remain and
keep guard."
So saying, the robber went to the entrance to the cave,
pushed aside the plants which almost concealed it, and
stooping his tall, gaunt figure, entered in. Horace felt an
almost irresistible impulse to try once more the descent of
the rocks, impossible as he had found it to be to climb down
while the shackles confined his ankles. He was almost
bewildered by what he heard, evil tidings succeeding evil
tidings with a rapidity which had overpowered for a time the
stronger nature of Raphael, disciplined as it had been by
conflict and suffering.
"One might deem that you had been the one to lose a
brother," he observed, "or that you had just seen the ghost
of Enrico. You look white as a corpse on the bier."
"Through the most intricate part you shall have it; but
when we reach the post guarded by Marco, we must
separate; it is only wrapt in disguise that you will be able to
pass him."
"You could not serve me, even were you to return to the
cave," said Raphael; "I could not replace the chains; the
Rubicon was passed when I filed them asunder. My chance
of escape would be greatly lessened by my having to care
for your safety as well as my own. Therefore go, my friend
—my brother!"
CHAPTER XVI.
A PERILOUS PASS.
Horace struck his brow with his hand. "What can I do?
Oh, what can I do? A rope were worth the ransom of a
king!"
"I can't hold out long; the rush will bear me down." The
voice was fainter than before.
"I see it, but I can't reach it!" shrieked the miserable
man; the dark line of the rope lay on the foam just beyond
his outstretched hand.
Enrico heard not, cared not for the sobs of delight with
which a mother embraced a rescued son, nor knew the
deep sympathy with which both Mrs. Cleveland and Horace
now bent over Raphael. Had an earthquake shaken the
forest, Enrico would scarcely have felt it. His brother's head
was supported on his breast; the expression of the features
was serene and painless, the heavy eyelids closed, and the
long dark lashes resting on the colorless cheek.
*******
A full pardon for Enrico was ere long procured from the
king of Naples. It was granted partly on account of the
services of his father, partly because of the earnest
pleadings of the Clevelands, who thus sought to repay some
portion of the deep debt which they owed his brother.