IMA Unit-1
IMA Unit-1
UNIT I
INTRODUCTION TO INSTRUMENTAL METHODS
ANALYSIS
Analysis refers to the detailed examination of the elements and their structure.
Chemical analysis uses instruments and methods used to separate, identify, and quantify
matter. Analytical chemistry is the science of obtaining, processing, and communicating
information about the composition and structure of matter.
Analysis
Qualitative Quantitative
Analysis Analysis
Qualitative analysis
Qualitative analysis deals with the identification of elements or functional groups
present in a sample. In short, quantitative analysis answers, “What is it?”
Example: inorganic salt analysis (identification of cations and anions), organic elemental
analysis, organic functional group analysis.
Quantitative analysis
Quantitative analysis deals with the quantification of the substance. It tells you
how much substance is present. In short, quantitative analysis answers, “How much is
it?” Example: Volumetric analysis (titrations)
Methods of
Analysis
Classical Instrumental
Methods Methods
Instrumental Analysis
Instrumental methods are often called modern method of analysis. The reason is
that these analytical techniques use modern equipment’s such as computers and other
electronic equipment. Instrumental method is expensive because the machines are highly
specialized for a particular chemical analysis. Quantitative results are often more accurate
and precise than the classical methods. Precision is dependent less on the operator and
more on the instrument and sources of noise. Not all schools and colleges can afford
those machines. Machines used are quite sophisticated that experts are needed to operate
the machines to avoid system malfunctioning.
Examples: Qualitative analysis using Gas Chromatography, High Performance Liquid
Chromatography, NMR (Nuclear Magnetic Resonance) spectroscopy etc.
Advantages
• Less labor intensive
• Easy to automate
• Simultaneous multi component analysis
• Fast analysis
• Lower detection limits
Disadvantages
• Higher expense
• Harder to trouble shoot problems, more technical expertise
Lambert’s Law
Lambert’s law explains the relationship between absorption of light by molecules and
thickness of the medium. Lambert’s law can be stated as “When a beam of monochromatic radiation
is allowed to pass through a homogeneous absorbing medium, the rate of decrease of intensity of
radiation dI, with the thickness of absorbing medium dx is proportional to intensity of incident
radiation, I”.
Department of Chemical Engineering
Mathematically Lambert’s may be stated as,
Where I denotes the intensity of incident radiation of wavelength λ, t denotes the thickness
of the medium and kdenotes the proportionality factor. On integrating the above equation and putting
I=I0 and t=0, we get
Where I0 is the intensity of incident radiation, It is the intensity of transmitted radiation and
kis the constant which depends upon the wavelength and absorbing medium used.
In the above equation K is the absorption coefficient defined as, reciprocal of thickess
which is require to reduce the light to 1/10 of its intensity
Beer’s Law
Lambert’s law show that there exist a logarithmic relationship between transmittance and
the length of the optical path through the sample. Beer observed that a similar relationship holds
between transmittance and concentration of solution. The intensity of monochromatic light decreases
exponentially with the increase in concentration of the absorbing substance arithmetically.
The above equation is termed as the mathematical statement of Beer-Lambert’s law. This
is also the fundamental equation of spectrophotometry.
Where ε is a new constant called as molar absorptivity or molar extinction coefficient. Its
unit depends on the unit of concentration and thickness. The concentration is measured in terms of
mol dm-3 and x in centimeters. When c=1mol dm-3, x = 1 cm, then
A=ε
Molar absorption coefficient is the absorbance of the solution when concentration is 1mol
-3
dm and path length is 1 cm.
Experimental procedure
A series of concentrations of standard solution (10, 20, 30, 40, 50 ppm) are prepared.
Corresponding absorbance is measured using colorimeter or spectrophotometer. A blank solution with
reagents alone is also prepared and the absorbance of this blank is set as zero. Absorbance increases
linearly with concentration. After measuring absorbance of standard solutions, the absorbance of the
unknown sample is measured. Concentration corresponding to that particular absorbance is the
concentration of unknown sample.
• Real deviations
• Chemical deviations
• Instrumental deviations
Conformity with Beer-Lambert’s law can be maintained by ensuring the presence of only
one absorbing species by maintaining appropriate experimental conditions. For recording the
absorbance of potassium dichromate solution at its absorption maximum at 450 nm a small amount
of dilute sulphuric acid is added to ensure that the above equilibrium is shifted to the left and only
dichromate ion remain in the solution. The absorbance of potassium dichromate solution can be
measured at 375 nm by adding a few ml of 0.05M potassium hydroxide to ensure the presence of
chromate ions only.
Instrumental deviations
This deviation arises depending upon the bandwidth of the instrument. The bandwidth of
the instrument depends on the wavelength resolving capacity of the optical system consisting of the
monochromator and slits and varies from instruments to instruments. More sophisticated instruments
with better resolving power have narrow bandwidth and allows incident radiation of wavelength with
Photometric titrations
Photometric titrations also known as spectrophotometric titrations involve monitoring the
changes in the absorbance of the reaction mixture at specified wavelength during titration in order
to locate the end point. During the titration the change in the absorbance is recorded for each
incremental addition of the titrant well beyond the end point. The plot of absorbance versus the
volume of the titrant consists of two intersecting straight lines of different slopes and the end point
is located graphically by dropping a perpendicular from the intersection point to the x-axis. A
curve may be obtained instead of sharp intersecting lines near the end point due to incomplete
reaction or dilution. End point location will be better by plotting the absorbance corrected for
volume changes or by using a concentrated solution of the titrant to minimize the volume changes.
Photometric titrations involving variety of reactions may be carried out if the absorbing system
obeys Beer-Lambert’s law. Different types of graphical plot can be obtained based on whether the
analyte alone absorbs or product alone absorbs, or titrant alone absorbs, etc., at the chosen
wavelength as shown in below figures.
Examples for curve a is iron (III) – salicyclic acid complex versus EDTA at 525 nm or p-
toulidine versus perchloric acid in butanol at 290 nm. Cure b example is copper (II) versus EDTA
at 745 nm, curve c – arsenic (III) versus bromate bromide mixture at 326 nm and curve f-
formation of colored products of different compositions.
Advantage is taken of bismuth (III) with EDTA compared to that of copper (II) with EDTA. At a
chosen wavelength of 745 nm the cations and EDTA don’t have any absorbance and the Bi-EDTA
complex also don’t absorb. Hence, the absorbance remains close to zero until all the bismuth have
reacted with EDTA. Copper reacts with EDTA only after all bismuth has completely reacted and
absorbance shows an increase as more Cu-EDTA complex is formed. When all the Cu has reacted
absorbance level off as the excess EDTA added does not absorb. Thus the two end point can be
detected in a single titration curve.
A similar photometric titration can be carried out with the mixture of arsenic (III) and
antimony (III) with potassium bromate-bromide mixture at 326 nm. Arsenic (III) is oxidized first
by bromate-bromide mixture, the absorbance remaining unchanged. After all arsenic is oxidized
antimony is oxidized, the absorbance decreasing to a minimum till the end point and increasing
with the excess titrant.
Advantages of photometric titrations
• Better precision and accuracy compared to direct absorbance measurement
• Very dilute solutions can be handled
• Greater choice of experimental conditions as it is sufficient that any one of species, namely
analyte, product or titrant only need to absorb at the chosen wavelength
• Even slightly turbid solutions can be handled
• Relative changes in absorbance alone measure and not the absolute values
• The end point can be easily detected by graphical as long as straight lines segment can be
obtained and extrapolated.
Multicomponent Analysis
Analysis of samples with numerous components presents a major challenge in modern
analysis. Multi- component analysis has become one of the most appealing topics for analytical
chemists in the last few years, in fields as clinical chemistry, drug analysis, pollution control,…. etc.
Different analytical techniques can be applied for multicomponent analysis including;
spectrophotometry, chromatography, and electrophoresis. UV spectrophotometric techniques are
Advantages
• It avoids prior separation techniques e.g. extraction, concentration of constituents, and cleanup
steps that might be required
• spectral data are readily acquired with ease
• process is fast, accurate, and simple
• wide applicability to both organic and inorganic systems
• typical detection limits of 10-4 to 10-5 M
• Moderate to high selectivity.
• If a sample contains two absorbing drugs
Criteria for obtaining maximum precision, based upon absorbance ratios, have been suggested
that place limits on the relative concentrations of the components of the mixture. The criteria are that
the ratios should lie outside the range 0.1-2.0 for the precise determination of y
and x respectively. These criteria are satisfied only when the λ max of the two components reasonably
dissimilar and if the two components do not interact chemically, thereby negating the initial
assumption that the total absorbance is the sum of the individual absorbances. Simultaneous equation
method was developed for simultaneous determination of several mixtures, e.g. atenolol and
indapamide, and dexibuprofen and paracetamol.
2. Difference spectrophotometry
The selectivity and accuracy of spectrophotometric analysis of samples containing absorbing
interferents may be markedly improved by the technique of difference spectrophotometry. The
essential feature of this method is that the measured value is the absorbance difference between two
equimolar solutions of the analyte in different chemical forms which exhibit different spectral
characteristics. The criteria for applying difference spectrophotometry to the assay of the substance in
the presence of other absorbing substances are that Reproducible changes may be introduced in the
spectrum of the analyte by the addition of one or more reagents. 1- The absorbance of the interfering
substances is not altered by that reagent. The simplest and the most commonly employed techniques
for altering the spectral properties of the analyte is the adjustment of the pH by means of aqueous
solutions of acids, alkalies or buffers.
Where; AM is the absorbance of the mixture, are the molar absorptivities, C x and C y are the
concentrations of x and y, respectively. If the absorbance of the mixture is divided by the absorbance
of a standard solution of x (its absorbance ), the following equation results
The ratio is a constant value (Fig. 1) which can be eliminated by taking the difference in absorbance ratio
amplitudes between two wavelengths λ 1 and λ 2 (peak to peak measurement)
Eq. (8) illustrates that the amplitude difference in the mixture absorbance ratio between two
wavelengths (termed; peak to peak, peak to trough, maximum to minimum measurement, or ratio
difference spectrophotometric method) is equal to the same amplitude difference for compound y after
canceling the constant interference due to compound x. The concentration of compound y (C y) is
proportional to the peak to peak amplitudes of its absorbance spectra. A calibration graph is obtained
by recording and storing the spectra of solutions of different concentrations of pure y, and the
spectrum of a solution of pure x (the divisor x0). The stored spectra of the solutions of pure y are
The difference between the two spectra and (Fig. 1) is due to the constant interference value
due to compound x (C x / C x0 ). Elimination of such interference can be done by measurement of ratio
spectra difference between two wavelengths or calculating derivative of the ratio spectra. Second
derivative of the ratio spectra may be also used to improve linearity, mean % recoveries and decrease
relative standard deviation. A derivative ratio spectrum was modified for the determination of ternary
mixtures using the derivative ratio spectra zero-crossing method. This method is realized by
measurement of amplitudes at the zero- crossing points in the derivative ratio spectra. Elimination of
such interference can be done by measurement of ratio spectra difference between two wavelengths or
calculating derivative of the ratio spectra. Second derivative of the ratio spectra may be also used to
improve linearity, mean % recoveries and decrease relative standard deviation. Derivative ratio
spectra was modified for the determination of ternary mixtures using the derivative ratio spectra zero-
crossing method. This method is realized by measurement of amplitudes at the zero- crossing points in
the derivative ratio spectra.
The ratioC x/ C 0 is a constant value which can be eliminated by taking the difference in
absorbance ratio amplitudes between two wavelengths λ 1 and λ 2 (peak to peak measurement)
Eq. (8) illustrates that the amplitude difference in the mixture absorbance ratio between two wavelengths
(termed; peak to peak, peak to trough, maximum to minimum measurement, or ratio difference
spectrophotometric method) is equal to the same amplitude difference for compound y after canceling the
constant interference due to compound x. The concentration of compound y (Cy) is proportional to the
peak to peak amplitudes of its absorbance spectra. A calibration graph is obtained by recording and
storing the spectra of solutions of different concentrations of pure y, and the spectrum of a solution of
pure x (the divisor x0). The stored spectra of the solutions of pure y are divided by the standard spectrum
of the divisor (x0). In the generated ratio spectra, the peak to peak amplitudes between the selected
wavelengths are measured and plotted against C y to obtain the calibration graph. By using the
calibration graph, the concentration of compound y in the mixture is determined after similar treatment
for the mixture solution. The concentration of x in the mixture is determined by an analogous procedure.
Ratio spectra method was developed for the simultaneous determination of several binary mixtures e.g.,
emtricitabine and tenofovir, diclofenac and pantoprazole and ternary mixtures.