SUB-TOPIC timeless. This view is called rationalism. SUB-SUB-TOPIC Rationalists promote mathematical or logical knowledge as paradigm examples. Such knowledge can be grasped, they claim, through reason alone, without involving the senses THE SOURCE OF HUMAN KNOWLEDGE directly. They argue that knowledge accessed through The journey of acquiring knowledge begins with its sources. reasoning is eternal (i.e., it exists unchanged throughout the Traditionally, there are several primary sources of human past, present, and future). For instance, two plus three knowledge: remains five. Rationalists are impressed by the certainty and clarity of knowledge that reasoning provides, and they EXPERIENCE/PERCEPTION. Our senses provide argue that this method should be applied to gaining immediate experiences of the world. We learn through the knowledge of the world also. The evidence of the senses five outwards senses (sight, sound, touch, taste, and smell) should be in conformity with the truths of reason, but it is and inward senses (emotions). While perception is a not a prerequisite for the acquisition of these truths. powerful source, it can be subjective and influenced by individual circumstances. But where do we ultimately get the ideas on which reason is based, if not from observation or experience? Rationalists REASON. This source relies on logical thought and rational tend to favor innatism, the belief that we are born with analysis. Through reasoning, we draw conclusions from certain ideas already in our minds. available information, allowing us to construct knowledge that is not solely dependent on sensory experience. That is, they are “innate” in us. Potential examples include mathematical or logical principles, moral sense, and the AUTHORITY/TESTIMONY. For things difficult or concept of God. While innatists claim that such ideas are impossible to know by personal experience, people present in us from birth, this does not guarantee our frequently turn to an authority; that is, they seek knowledge immediate awareness of their presence. Reason is the from someone who has had experience with the problem or faculty that enables us to realize or access them. In what has some other source of expertise. People accept the follows, innate ideas thus serve as the foundation of a truth, the word of recognized authorities. Testimony model for rationalism. includes information passed down through culture, education, and communication. While it allows for the A posteriori knowledge - latin for “from the latter”. accumulation of collective knowledge, it also raises Knowledge that is dependent on experience or which arises questions about reliability and bias. after experience. In contrast, this knowledge arises from experience and empirical observation. Scientific knowledge INTROSPECTION. This involves looking inward to typically falls into this category, relying on experimentation understand our thoughts and feelings. It is crucial for and evidence. This view is called empiricism. self-awareness and understanding our own cognitive processes, though it can be limited by personal perspective. START OF LECTURE Problem of Knowledge These sources interact and often overlap, creating a rich tapestry of knowledge. However, they also introduce 1. May freedom challenges, such as the potential for misinformation and 2. Capable of thinking subjective interpretations.
“All ideas must pass through our senses” - Aristotle
THE NATURE OF HUMAN KNOWLEDGE The nature of human knowledge i
The nature of human knowledge is inherently complex. Source of Knowledge
Knowledge can be classified into two main types: The power of the mind to think, understand the form of judgment through logic. A priori knowledge - latin for “from the former”. The reason is the primary source of knowledge. This is knowledge that is independent of observation and experience, such as mathematical truths or logical The Allegory of the Cave, a famous story by the Greek philosopher Plato, is a way to explain how people understand the world around them and how they can be limited by their own perceptions.
Imagine a group of people who have been living in a dark
cave their whole lives. They are chained in such a way that they can only see the wall in front of them. Behind them, there's a fire, and between the fire and the prisoners, objects are moved, casting shadows on the wall. Since the prisoners can't see the real objects or the fire, they believe the shadows are the only reality.
One day, a prisoner escapes and leaves the cave. At first,
he's blinded by the sunlight outside, but eventually, his eyes adjust, and he sees the real world—trees, rivers, and people. He realizes that the shadows in the cave were just illusions and that reality is much more complex.
The story is a metaphor for knowledge and learning. The
cave represents ignorance, the shadows are false beliefs, and leaving the cave symbolizes gaining true understanding. Plato is saying that most people live in ignorance, only seeing the "shadows" of reality, and only through education and critical thinking can they understand the truth. SOURCE: ● https://press.rebus.community/intro-to-phil-epistemolog y/chapter/sources-of-knowledge-rationalism-empiricis m-and-the-kantian-synthesis/ ●