Ucel Essay

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 4

2021-2022 Semester 1

Understanding Culture and Everyday Life Individual Assignment Topics: Q1 – Gender

CCCU4003-CL05 Ho Kwan Wing (20182494) No. of words: 900-1100words

Why Must We Marry At All? – A Case Analysis of “Little Women (1994 American film)” on

Gender Practice Related to Marriage Views

How can a story written in the 19th century be adapted into film and television works

fourteen times, and it is still not considered obsolete until now in the 21st century? The

messages it embeds and the cultural value it contains should be immortal. “Little Women”

written by Louisa Alcott is one of these classic novels, and the film in 1994 is one of the best

adaptations of this story. The film plot revolves around daily lives of four sisters of the March

family during the American Civil War in 19th century, and through various gender practices,

different marriage views and gender images are depicted. Based on theories of Gender

Performance (Judith Butler, 1990), it is known that gender is a shifting effect of ideological

practices. Therefore in this analytical essay, gender practices in “Little Women (1994 film)”

would be described, representation of gender ideologies in the film text would be

exemplified, and the relationship between gender practice and gender ideology would be

explained.

Firstly, the idea that both men and women need marriage is deepened through the plot
development, it is when the film characters plan and equip themselves for their future. Since

marriage is considered essential by mainstream society, it is a norm that most characters in

this film decide about how and whom to marry in their life plans. At the meantime, Jo (main

character) is the only one who dares to question about why they must marry, her later

experience is also affected by this. When she rejected a proposal from her best friend Laurie,

she feels herself so resistant to marriage, and she feels extremely depressed because she

hurts her best friend in a ‘awkward’ way. She cries out that there is something wrong to her,

she wants to change but she can’t, and she just knows she will never fit in anywhere. Her

feelings imply that refusing to marry is not a marriage view accepted by the society,

therefore she even judges herself as ‘wrong’. The notion of having to get married is so

immutable that most people around Jo firmly believe that she will succumb to matrimonial

fate eventually, even when she goes to America only for chasing her writing dream.

Unexpectedly (or expectedly), Jo still gets married in the end, symbolizing a ‘happy ending’

of her love story which follows the ‘correct’ direction of the plot might be one of the

purposes. In short, the filmmaker might think that this ending will be accepted by the

general audience relatively. Jo giving up subverting the traditional gendered expectations in

the end further implied that marriage is a must.

Next, people conform gender images that are expected and preferred by society for a
chance to marry better, and this phenomenon is naturalized through dialogues between the

film characters. Men are told to be gentle, highly educated, hold property, vote and serve in

the union, etc. For instance, Laurie in this film is told not to “shout at ladies as if they were

cattle”, his grandfather insists him “go to college”, John is expected by his mother-in-law that

he “must secure a house” and “must do his service to the union”. On the other side, women

are told to maintain slim body figure, their beauty and disposition, dress up properly, be

well-mannered and graceful, not to speak loudly or crudely etc. For example, when one of

the young girls first went to her into-social-world party, she “didn’t eat for weeks

beforehand”, and she warns another girl Sally “you won’t be able to draw your laces” as she

saw Sally eating some desserts. An aunt asks the March mother, “how is she to be married

without a proper debut?”, and she is referring to that kind of party where girls wear elegant

dresses to attract suitors and receive their proposals. When Jo wants to invite Laurie to join

the game between March sisters, they told her that “when it’s only ladies, we don’t guard

our conduct in the same way”. Another example is that Amy always reminds her sisters not

to say words like ‘awful’, ‘blast’ and ‘wretch’. All the above examples from the film shows

that most of the characters agree to be shaped into stereotypical gender images, and they

also take action to judge people around and pass the ideas on. In the society where people

agree that masculinity and femininity is the key to attract the opposite sex, those who

subvert this ideological culture are being negatively judged.


Lastly, people’s experiences and behavior are still influenced by these gender

perceptions regardless of their marital status, and this situation is shown through the

characterization of film characters. The March mother, who is a mature married woman, still

being judged by saying the word ‘corsets’ in front of a man. Jo, who refused to get married,

still feels sad when her beautiful long hair is sold. Amy, who has not reached the

marriageable age, tries to reshape her nose to make herself more good-looking since young.

To conclude, gender ideologies are embedded and represented in the film text mainly

through plot development, dialogues and characterization. These ideologies work behind

the marriage views and the corresponding gender practices in this film. Since multiple

gender practices shape gender ideologies while these gender ideologies use their power to

reinforce those gender practices, it is seen that gender practice and gender ideology are

interrelated and interdependent. Reflecting on our society, similarly, we all live within the

notion of gender stereotypes no matter married, single or unmarried. Then what is the point

of using the necessity of marriage to rationalize our gender practices? We might find out

that this is just one of the means used by different social institutions to blur ideologies

hidden behind to limit our freedom.

You might also like