T8 FE Course Report V2020-Eng
T8 FE Course Report V2020-Eng
T8 FE Course Report V2020-Eng
Course Code:
Program:
Department:
College:
Institution:
Table of Contents
A. Field Experience Identification:...............................................................................3
B. Training Delivery and Assessment:.............................................................................3
1.Training Methods and Activities:.............................................................................................3
2. Assessment Methods...............................................................................................................3
3. Differences in evaluation.........................................................................................................3
4. Verification of Credibility of Students’ Results......................................................................3
5. Recommendations...................................................................................................................4
C. Student Results..............................................................................................................4
1. Distribution of Grades.............................................................................................................4
2. Comment on Student Results..................................................................................................4
3.Recommendations....................................................................................................................4
D. Field Experience Learning Outcomes.........................................................................4
1. Learning Outcomes Assessment Results.................................................................................4
2. Recommendations...................................................................................................................4
E. Field Experience Quality Evaluation.........................................................................5
1. Students Evaluation of the Quality of Field Experience.........................................................5
2. Supervisory Staff.....................................................................................................................5
3. Other Evaluations....................................................................................................................5
4.Recommendations:...................................................................................................................6
F. Difficulties and Challenges...........................................................................................6
G. Field Experience Improvement Plan..........................................................................6
1. Field Experience Improvement Actions..................................................................................6
2. Action Plan for Next Semester/Year.....................................................................................6
2
A.Field Experience Identification
Number of Students
No Supervisor(s) Location Starting Completing
the course the course
2. Assessment Methods
Were They Difficulties
Implemented? Experienced in
Planned Assessment Methods Suggested Actions
Yes No Implementation
(if any)
3. Differences in Evaluation
If the field teaching staff and the program faculty and teaching staff share responsibility for student assessment,
what process is followed for resolving differences?
5. Recommendations
3
C. Student Results
1. Distribution of Grades
Grades Status Distributions
In Progress
Withdrawn
Incomplete
Denied
Entry
A+ A B+ B C+ C D+ D F
Pass
Fail
Number of
Students
Percentage
3. Recommendations
1.2
1.3
1...
2 Skills:
2.1
2.2
2.3
2...
3 Values:
3.1
3.2
3.3
3...
2. Recommendations
4
1. Students Evaluation of the Quality of Field Experience
Number of Percentage of
Date of Survey: Evaluation Result:
Participants: Participation:
Course Coordinator/Instructor
Students Feedback
Comments/Response
Strengths:
Areas for improvement:
2. Supervisory Staff
(Including Field Supervisors, Supervising Teaching Staff)
Evaluation method: Date: Number of Participants:
Course Coordinator/Instructor
Supervisory Staff Feedback
Comments/Response
Strengths:
Areas for improvement:
Suggestions for Improvement:
* Add separate table for each evaluation
3. Other Evaluations
Ex. Evaluation by program administrators, peer reviewers, independent reviewers, program advisory committee,
Others (specify)
Evaluation method: Date:
Course Coordinator/Instructor
Evaluator(s) Comments
Comments/Response
Strengths:
Areas for improvement:
Suggestions for Improvement:
* Add separate table for each evaluation
5
4. Recommendations:
Supervision **
Students
* Include administrative Issues, implementation times (Duration) and locations, learning resources, facilities and
equipment, etc.
** Include field supervisors from inside and outside the program
* The developmental measures taken during Training and not included in the development plan of it.
2. Action Plan for Next Semester/Year
Responsibility Time Needed
Recommendations Actions For
Implementation Start End Support
1.
2.
3.