EVALUATION OF EXPERIENTIAL LEARNING

EXPERIENTIAL LEARNING PHASE -I

Rubrics for evaluation of Problem Definition
Needs
Excellent Very Good Good Satisfactory
Criteria Improvement
(10-8) (7-6) (5-4) (3-2)
(1-0)
Problem is
Problem is Problem is
clearly and
clearly defined defined but Problem is Problem is not
Clarity concisely
but could be lacks specificity vaguely defined. clearly defined.
defined with
more concise. or focus.
specific focus.
Somewhat
Highly relevant Relevant and Not relevant or
relevant but not Relevance to the
Relevance and significant significant to significant to the
entirely field is unclear.
to the field. the field. field.
significant.
Provides Provides
Provides some Provides little
thorough adequate No background or
Context background and background and
background and background and context provided.
context. context.
context. context.

Rubrics for evaluation of Objectives

Excellent Very Good Good Satisfactory Needs
Criteria
(5) (4) (3) (2) Improvement (1)

Objectives are
Objectives are Objectives are
somewhat clear Objectives are
clear, specific, clear but could No objectives or
Specificity but not entirely unclear or
and be more very unclear.
specific or vague.
measurable. specific.
measurable.
Objectives are Objectives are Objectives have Objectives are
well-aligned mostly aligned some alignment poorly aligned No alignment with
Alignment with the with the with the with the the problem
problem problem problem problem definition.
definition. definition. definition. definition.
Objectives are Objectives are
Objectives are
Objectives are realistic but somewhat
Achievabilit unrealistic or Objectives are not
realistic and may be realistic but
y difficult to achievable.
achievable. challenging to could be more
achieve.
achieve. achievable.
 EVALUATION OF EXPERIENTIAL LEARNING

Rubrics for evaluation of Methodology

Excellent Very Good Good Satisfactory Needs
Criteria
(5) (4) (3) (2) Improvement (1)
Methodology is
Methodology is Methodology Methodology is Methodology is
Appropriaten highly
appropriate for is somewhat somewhat inappropriate or
ess appropriate for
objectives. appropriate. inappropriate. not provided.
objectives.
Methodology
Methodology is Methodology is
lacks some Methodology is No methodology
detailed and mostly detailed
Detail detail or poorly detailed or very poorly
well- and
documentatio or documented. documented.
documented. documented.
n.
Flow chart
Flow chart is Flow chart
design is
accurate, but lacks
accurate, with Flow chart is
some precision with Flow chart lacks
Flow chart all details, incomplete and
components are respect to the interpretation
initial and final not well framed
not clearly stated
steps are clearly
defined objectives
presented
 EVALUATION OF EXPERIENTIAL LEARNING
EXPERIENTIAL LEARNING PHASE -II

Rubrics for evaluation of Project Execution

Needs
Excellent Very Good Good Satisfactory
Criteria Improvement
(15-12) (11-8) (7-4) (3-2)
(1-0)
Generally follows Follows Deviates
Closely follows
the methodology methodology significantly Does not follow
Adherence the defined
with minor with some from the the methodology.
methodology.
deviations. deviations. methodology.

Completed on Completed on Completed with Significant Not completed

Timeliness time and within time with minor some delays or delays or scope on time or
scope. scope issues. scope issues. issues. within scope.
High quality Satisfactory Poor quality
Good quality Very poor quality
work with quality with work with
Quality work with minor or incomplete
attention to noticeable significant
issues. work.
detail. issues. issues.

Rubrics for evaluation of Tools and Techniques Used

Needs
Excellent Very Good Good Satisfactory
Criteria Improvement
(10-8) (7-6) (5-4) (3-2)
(1-0)
Tools and
Tools and Tools and Tools and No tools and
techniques are
techniques are techniques are techniques are techniques or
Selection highly
appropriate and somewhat inappropriate or very
appropriate and
effective. appropriate. outdated. inappropriate.
cutting-edge.

Tools and Tools and Tools and Tools and

Tools and
techniques are techniques are techniques are techniques are
Application techniques are
expertly applied effectively adequately not applied or
poorly applied.
and utilized. applied. applied. misapplied.

Tools and Tools and

Tools and Tools and
techniques are techniques are No integration or
techniques are techniques are
Integration seamlessly well integrated very poorly
somewhat poorly
integrated into with minor integrated.
integrated. integrated.
the project. issues.
 EVALUATION OF EXPERIENTIAL LEARNING

Rubrics for evaluation of Partial Results

Needs
Excellent Very Good Good Satisfactory
Criteria Improvement
(5) (4) (3) (2)
(1)
Partial results
Partial results Partial results Partial results
are clearly Partial results are
are clear but are unclear or are not
Clarity presented and somewhat clear
could be more poorly presented or
well- but lack detail.
detailed. documented. very unclear.
documented.
Shows Shows good Shows some
Shows no
significant and progress but progress but Shows little
Progress progress or
meaningful could be more lacks progress.
regress.
progress. significant. significance.

Partial results
Partial results Partial results are Partial results
are analyzed but No analysis or
are thoroughly somewhat are poorly
Analysis interpretation interpretation of
analyzed and analyzed but lack analyzed or
could be partial results.
interpreted. interpretation. interpreted.
improved.
 EVALUATION OF EXPERIENTIAL LEARNING

EXPERIENTIAL LEARNING PHASE -III

Rubrics for evaluation of Complete Prototype Demonstration

Needs
Excellent Very Good Good Satisfactory
Criteria Improvement
(20-16) (15-11) (10-6) (5-3)
(2-0)
Prototype Prototype Prototype Prototype has
Prototype does not
functions functions functions but significant
Functionality function as
perfectly as well with with noticeable functionality
intended.
intended. minor issues. issues. issues.

Prototype
Prototype
shows high Prototype Prototype shows
shows good Prototype shows
Innovation levels of shows some no innovation or is
levels of little innovation.
innovation innovation. very basic.
innovation.
and creativity.

Prototype is Prototype is
Prototype is
user-friendly somewhat Prototype is very
highly user- Prototype is not
Usability with minor user-friendly difficult to use or
friendly and user-friendly.
usability but needs not usable.
intuitive.
issues. improvement.

Rubrics for evaluation of Results and Discussion

Needs
Excellent Very Good Good Satisfactory
Criteria Improvement
(10-8) (7-6) (5-4) (3-2)
(1-0)
Results are
Results are Results are
clear but Results are Results are not
clearly somewhat clear
Clarity explanation unclear or poorly presented or very
presented and but need more
could be explained. unclear.
well-explained. explanation.
improved.
Thorough and
Good analysis Adequate Limited analysis
insightful No analysis or very
Analysis with some analysis with with few
analysis of poor analysis.
insights. basic insights. insights.
results.
Interpretation
Interpretation is
is mostly Interpretation Interpretation is No interpretation
Interpretat logical and well-
logical and has some logic weak or poorly or illogical
ion supported by
supported by and support. supported. interpretation.
data.
data.
 EVALUATION OF EXPERIENTIAL LEARNING
Rubrics for evaluation of Report
Needs
Excellent Very Good Good Satisfactory
Criteria Improvement
(10-8) (7-6) (5-4) (3-2)
(1-0)
Report is
Report has
Report is well- organized but
basic Report is poorly Report is not
Organization organized and could
organization organized. organized.
flows logically. improve in
but lacks flow.
flow.
Report is Report is Report is very
Report has Report is
clear, concise, mostly clear unclear or
Clarity some clarity but unclear with
and free of with minor contains
contains errors. many errors.
errors. errors. numerous errors.

All necessary Most sections Some sections

Several sections Many sections are
sections are are complete are complete
Completeness are incomplete missing or
complete and and but lacking
or lacking detail. incomplete.
thorough. thorough. detail.

Rubrics for evaluation of Poster and PPT demonstration

Needs
Excellent Very Good Good Satisfactory
Criteria Improvement
(10-8) (7-6) (5-4) (3-2)
(1-0)
Somewhat
Visually
Visually appealing visually Poor visual
Visual appealing with Very poor visual
and professionally appealing but appeal or
Appeal minor design appeal or design.
designed. with design design.
issues.
issues.
Information is Information is Information is
Information is Information is
clearly presented mostly clear but somewhat clear
Clarity unclear or very unclear or
and easy to could be more but needs more
confusing. missing.
understand. concise. clarity.

Poster includes Poster includes

Poster includes Poster is Poster is missing
all key most key
some key missing several many key
Content components and components
components but key components components or
relevant and
misses details. or details. details.
information. information.
EVALUATION OF EXPERIENTIAL LEARNING