Readingpracticetest1 v9 18903875
Readingpracticetest1 v9 18903875
January
Reading Practice Test 1
HOW TO USE
You have 2 ways to access the test
Experiments have shown that younger monkeys consistently outperform their older colleagues
on memory tests. Formerly, psychologists concluded that memory and other mental functions
in humans deteriorate over time because of changes in the brain. Thus mental decline after
young adulthood appeared inevitable. The truth, however, is not quite so simple.
Stanley Rapoport at the National Institute of Health in the United States measured the flow of
blood in the brains of old and young people as they completed different tasks. Since blood flow
reflects neural activity. Rapoport could compare which networks of neurons were the same, the
neural networks they used were significantly different. The older subjects used different
internal strategies to accomplish comparable results at the same time,'Rapoport says. At the
Georgia Institute of Technology, psychologist Timothy Salthouse compared a group of fast and
accurate typists of college age with another group in their 60s. Both groups typed 60 words a
minute. The older typists, it turned out, achieved their speed with cunning little strategies that
made them more efficient than their younger counterparts. They made fewer finger shifts,
gaining a fraction of a second here and there. They also read ahead in the test. The neural
networks involved in typing appear to have been reshaped to compensate for losses in motor
skills or other age changes.
In fact, there's evidence that deterioration in mental functions can actually be reversed.
Neuropsychologist Marion Diamond at the University of California has shown that mental
activity maks neurons sprout new dendrites* which establish connections with other neurons.
The dendrites shrink when the mind is idle. For example,'when a rat is kept in isolation, the
animal's brain shrinks, but if we put that rat with other rats in a large cage and give them an
assortment of toys, we can show, after four days, significant differences in its brain.'says
Diamond. After a month in the enriched surroundings, the whole cerebral cortex has expanded,
as has its blood supply.'But even in the enriched surroundings, rats get bored unless the toys
are varied. Animals are just like we are. They need stimulation,'says Diamond. A busy mental
lifestyle keeps the human mind fit, says Warner Schaie of Penn State University. ‘People who
regularly participate in challenging tasks retain their intellectual abilities better than mental
couch potatoes.'
In his studies, Schaie detected a decline in mental function among individuals who underwent
One of the most profoundly important mental functions is memory. Memory exists in more than
one form, what we call knowledge- facts- is what psychologists such as Harry Bahrick of Ohio
Wesleyan University call semantic memory. Events, conversations and occurrences in time and
space, on the other hand, make up episodic memory. It's true that episodic memory begins to
decline when most people are in their 50s, but it's never perfect at any age.
Probing the longevity of knowledge, Bahrick tested 1,000 high school graduates to see how
well they remembered the school subject algebra. Some had completed the course a month
before, other 50 years earlier. Surprisingly, he found that a person's grasp of algebra did not
depend on how long ago he'd taken the course. The determining factor was the duration of
instruction. Those who had spent only a few months learning algebra forgot most of it within
two or three years while others who had been instructed for longer remembered better.
According to Bahrick,'the long-term residue of knowledge remains stable over the decades,
independent of the age of the person and the memory.'
Perhaps even more important than the ability to remember is the ability to manage memory- a
mental function known as metamemory.'You could say metamemory is a byproduct of going to
school,'says psychologist Robert Kail of Purdue University,'The question-and-answer
process,especially exam taking, helps children learn and teaches them how their memory
functions.This may be one reason why the better educated a person is, the more likely they are
to perform well in many aspects of life and in psychological assessments: A group of adult
novice chess players were compared with a group of child experts at the game. But when
asked to remember the patterns of chess pieces arranged on a board, the children won.'
Because they'd played a lot of chess, their knowledge of chess was better organized than that
of the adults, and their existing knowledge of chess served as a framework for new
memory,'explains Kail. Cognitive style, another factor in maintaining mental function, is what
Schaie calls the ability to adapt and roll with life's punches.'He measured mental flexibility with
questions and tests requiring people to carry out in an offbeat way an everyday activity they
had done millions of times. One example was asking people to copy a paragraph substituting
uppercase letters for lowercase ones. These tests seem silly, but flexible-minded people
manage to complete them,'says Schaie. The rigid person responds with tension instead and
performs poorly. Those who score highly on tests of cognition at an advanced age are those
who tested high in mental flexibility at middle age'.
On a more optimistic note, one mental resource that only improves with time is specialized
knowledge. Crystallised intelligence about one's occupation apparently does not decline at all
until at least age 75. Vocabulary is another such specialized form of knowledge. Research
clearly shows that vocabulary develops with time. Retired teachers and journalists consistently
score higher on tests of vocabulary and general information than college students.
1 What does the writer say about the performance of older typists on the test?
A brain structure only changed when the rats were given a familiar toy
C the rats lived longer then they were part of a social group
3 A comparison between adults and children who played chess showed that
D the adults had clearer memories of chess games they had played
Questions 4-9
Complete the summary below.
Choose ONE WORD ONLY from the passage for each answer.
School also helps with a brain function called 7 . This is why a more
highly educated person is generally more successful and does better in 8
tests.
Some of our mental functions remain unaffected by age or even improve. For
example, as we get older, our knowledge of 9 increases.
Questions 10-13
Look at the following statements and the list of people below.
List of People
A Stanley Rapoport
B Marion Diamond
C Warner Schaie
D Harry Bahrick
E Robert Kail
Write the correct letter, A-E, in boxes 10-13 on your answer sheet.
10
The educational system makes students aware of how their
memory works.
11
Although older people may use a different mental approach
when completing a task, they can still achieve the same result as younger people
12
Being open to new ways of doing things can have a positive
impact on your mental condition as we get older
13
Both animals and humans need to exist in an environment full of
interest.
Six miles outside the town of Decorah, Iowa in the USA, an 890-acre stretch of rolling fields
and woods called Heritage Farm is letting its crops go to seed. Everything about Heritage Farm
is in stark contrast to the surrounding acres of intensively farmed fields of corn and soybean
that are typical of modern agriculture. Heritage Farm is devoted to collecting rather than
growing seeds. It is home to the Seed Savers Exchange, one of the largest non government-
owned seed banks in the United States.
In 1975 Diane Ott Whealy was given the seedlings of two plant varieties that her great
grandfather had brought to America from Bavaria in 1870: Grandpa Ott’s morning glory and
his German Pink tomato. Wanting to preserve similar traditional varieties, known as heirloom
plants, Diane and her husband, Kent, decided to establish a place where the seeds of the past
could be kept and traded. The exchange now has more than 13,000 members, and the many
thousands of heirloom varieties they have donated are kept in its walk-in coolers, freezers, and
root cellars the seeds of many thousands of heirloom varieties and, as you walk around an old
red barn that is covered in Grandpa Ott’s beautiful morning glory blossoms, you come across
the different vegetables, herbs, and flowers they have planted there.
"Each year our members list their seeds in this,"Diane Ott Whealy says, handing over a copy of
the Seed Savers Exchange 2010 Yearbook. It is as thick as a big-city telephone directory, with
page after page of exotic beans, garlic, potatoes, peppers, apples, pears, and plums-each with
its own name and personal history .For example, there’s an Estonian Yellow Cherry tomato,
which was brought to the seed bank by “an elderly Russian lady” who lived in Tallinn, and a
Persian Star garlic from “a bazaar in Samarkand.”There’s also a bean donated by
archaeologists searching for pygmy elephant fossils in New Mexico.
Heirloom vegetables have become fashionable in the United States and Europe over the past
decade, prized by a food movement that emphasizes eating locally and preserving the flavor
and uniqueness of heirloom varieties. Found mostly in farmers' markets and boutique groceries,
heirloom varieties have been squeezed out of supermarkets in favor of modern single-variety
fruits and vegetables bred to ship well and have a uniform appearance, not to enhance flavor.
But the movement to preserve heirloom varieties goes way beyond the current interest in North
Food variety extinction is happening all over the world - and it's happening fast. In the United
States an estimated 90 percent of historic fruit and vegetable varieties are no longer grown. Of
the 7,000 different apple varieties that were grown in the 1800s, fewer than a hundred remain.
In the Philippines thousands of varieties of rice once thrived; now only about a hundred are
grown there. In China 90 percent of the wheat varieties cultivated just a hundred years ago
have disappeared. Experts estimate that in total we have lost more than 50 percent of the
world's food varieties over the past century.
Why is this a problem? Because if disease or future climate change affects one of the handful
of plants we've come to depend on to feed our growing planet, we might desperately need one
of those varieties we've let become extinct. The loss of the world's cereal diversity is a
particular cause for concern. A fungus called Ug99, which was first identified in Uganda in
1999, is spreading across the world's wheat crops. From Uganda it moved to Kenya, Ethiopia,
Sudan, and Yemen. By 2007 it had jumped the Persian Gulf into Iran. Scientists predict that the
fungus will soon make its way into India and Pakistan, then spread to Russia and China, and
eventually the USA.
Roughly 90 percent of the world's wheat has no defense against this particular fungus. If it
reached the USA, an estimated one billion dollars' worth of crops would be at risk. Scientists
believe that in Asia and Africa alone, the portion currently in danger could leave one billion
people without their primary food source. A famine with significant humanitarian consequences
could follow, according to Rick Ward of Cornell University.
The population of the world is expected to reach nine billion by 2045. Some experts say we’ll
need to double our food production to keep up with this growth. Given the added challenge of
climate change and disease, it is becoming ever more urgent to find ways to increase food yield.
The world has become increasingly dependent upon a technology-driven, one-size-fits-all
approach to food supply. Yet the best hope for securing our food's future may depend on our
ability to preserve the locally cultivated foods of the past.
Questions 14-20
Do the following statements agree with the views of the writer in Reading Passage?
In boxes 14-20 on your answer sheet, write.
14
Heritage Farm is different from most other nearby farms.
15
Most nongovernment-owned seed banks are bigger than
Seed Savers Exchange.
16
Diane Ott Whealy's grandfather taught her a lot about seed
varieties.
17
The seeds people give to the Seed Savers Exchange are stored
outdoors.
18
Diane and her husband choose which heirloom seeds to grow
on Heritage Farm.
19
The seeds are listed in alphabetical order in The Seed Savers
Exchange Yearbook.
20
The Seed Savers Exchange Yearbook describes how each
seed was obtained.
Questions 21-26
Complete the notes below.
Choose ONE WORD AND/OR A NUMBER from the passage for each answer.
Write your answers in boxes 21-26 on your answer sheet.
Supermarkets
while people know about plants disappearing from 22 very few know
about the decline in fruit and vegetable varieties
Extinction of food varieties
Three main grounds for opposition to fluoridation have been expressed. First, opponents claim
the benefits are exaggerated or not established. Second, there are claims of health risks to pans
of the population, for example, allergic reactions. It is also accepted that high levels of fluoride
can cause discoloration of otherwise healthy teeth. Proponents do not consider this to be a
problem in such small concentrations, whereas opponents disagree - especially because some
people drink more water and obtain much more than the standard 1 milligram of fluoride per
day. Third, fluoridation is thought to be an infringement on individual rights because it is
compulsory medication of all members of a community.
An understanding of the fluoridation issue has important implications. If, according to the
experts, fluoridation is unquestionably a beneficial and non-hazardous measure, then the
wisdom of allowing the public to vote on, and reject it must be questioned.
Almost all studies that have been done have assumed that the scientific aspects of the
controversy are unproblematic, and they have excluded science from sociological examination.
The traditional view is that science is a special kind of knowledge, which is established through
scientific methods and objectively applied by members of a scientific community. However, in
recent years there has been a major challenge to this picture by a sociology of science that
shows how scientific knowledge is socially negotiated, and inevitably linked to the values of the
relevant parties, both scientists and nonscientists. These challengers do not see scientific
knowledge as exempt from social inquiry.
Kuhn (1970) argued that scientific knowledge does not always develop as an orderly process,
but is characterized by periodic revolutions. in which the methods of study and the assessment
criteria change in a fragmented way. According to Kuhn, the shift from one scientific way of
One interpretation of this analysis of science is that traditional distinctions between facts and
theories, and between scientific knowledge and values, can no longer be justified. Because
social processes are involved at all stages of the creation, evaluation, and establishing of
scientific knowledge, social values may also be involved.
In the same way as many scientists who study fluoridation have overlooked social values,
sociologists have also downplayed an important part of the debate by ignoring the number of
eminent scientists who have questioned aspects of fluoridation. An example is the study by
Sutton in 1960, which analyzed the classic North American studies of the effect of fluoridation
on tooth decay, and found that each showed significant methodological shortcomings. Sutton's
detailed study throws doubt as to the extent of reductions in tooth decay from fluoridation. Yet
Sutton's book is not cited in a single analysis of the fluoridation issue by any sociologist. In a
situation of some scientific uncertainty, differences in values are highlighted. A supporter of
fluoridation might argue. The evidence for the benefits of fluoridation is quite substantial, while
the evidence for harm is limited and dubious. I think the likely benefits outweigh the possible
dangers; hence I support fluoridation because it is the cheapest and easiest way to make sure
every child reaps the benefits. An opponent might argue, 'Though the evidence for the benefits
of fluoridation is substantial, there is some doubt about it. Since fluoridation is not necessary
for good teeth, we should forego the benefits if there is some slight chance of harm. Some
scientists claim that a small percentage of the population could be harmed by fluoride.
Therefore I oppose fluoridation of water supplies and favor the voluntary use of fluoride tablets
by those who want to take them.'
Both arguments consider the scientific evidence concerning fluoridation, but differ in their
assessments of the social benefits and costs. This difference is not between rationality and
irrationality but is a legitimate difference in values, for example, the positive value placed on
good teeth, the negative value placed on possible health risks, and the social benefits or costs
of compulsory or voluntary intake of fluorides.
From the sociological point of view, opposition to fluoridation is not necessarily irrational.
Rather, claims to rationality and to scientific authority are better seen as part of a strategy to
promote fluoridation than as incontrovertible statements of fact. Second, social values are likely
to be bound up in any decision about fluoridation, so this is not an issue on which declarations
by scientific experts ought to be considered the final word.
Questions 27-31
Access https://ieltsonlinetests.com for more practices page 11
Choose the correct letter, A, B, C or D
30 What did Sutton's research discover about earlier studies in North America?
31 In the last paragraph, what does the writer say about scientists?
Questions 32-35
Do the following statements agree with the views of the writer in Reading Passage?
NOT GIVEN if it is impossible to say what the writer thinks about this
32
Scientific knowledge should be kept separate from social
values.
33
Many sociologists have disregarded the doubts that some
scientists have concerning fluoridation.
34
Sutton's findings have been given insufficient attention by
scientists outside of North America.
35
There are valid arguments on both sides of the fluoridation
debate.
Questions 36-40
Complete each sentence with the correct ending. A-G.
Write the correct letter. A-G, in boxes 36-40 on your answer sheet.
36
The traditional view of science is that
37
A sociological view of science argues that
38
Collins is of the opinion that
E the serious damage fluoride causes far outweighs any positive effects.
F children are not the only ones who benefit from fluoridation.
Part 1: Question 1 - 13
1 C 2 D
3 B 4 semantic
5 episodic 6 algebra
7 metamemory 8 psychological
9 vocabulary 10 E
11 A 12 C
13 B
Part 2: Question 14 - 26
14 TRUE 15 FALSE
20 TRUE 21 appearance
22 rainforests 23 apples
26 Population
Part 3: Question 27 - 40
27 A 28 C
29 D 30 A
31 B 32 NO
35 YES 36 B
37 G 38 A
39 D 40 E