Criterion D Implications of Genetic Variation Within and Between Human Populations
Criterion D Implications of Genetic Variation Within and Between Human Populations
Criterion D Implications of Genetic Variation Within and Between Human Populations
Advantages:
A. Adaptation to changing environments: Genetic variation able
populations to adapt to vary and dynamic environments by
processes as natural selection, favored genetic alleles become
more spread over generations, implicating the ability of the
species to survive and thrive in various ecological and
geographical niches with tolerate environmental challenges, to
help the people in different regions endure their environment
better as the big nose for South-Africans that help them to get
the biggest amount of oxygen due to the moisture increased in
South Africa region at all.
B. Disease resistance: Genetic diversity along population could lead
to resistance against disease by heterogeneity in immune
response and genetic constructions meaning that even in the
face of emerging pathogens, with individuals likely to posses’
immunity or resistance, collaborating in overall health and
resilience of population against diseases, which lead to long-term
survival and adaptability of the population
C. Immune system diversity: Genetic diversity collaborates in
different immune responses, decreasing the risk of widespread
susceptibility to disorders. Different people have immune system
mechanisms, increasing overall resistance to different pathogens.
D. Cultural and Phenotypic diversity: Genetic variation is a driver of
cultural and phenotypic diversity along people populations. This
variety is reflected in phenotypic appearances as color, hair type
and cultural practices and traditions.
E. Historical migration and diversity: Human genetic variation is
caused by migration patterns through genetic flow which could
help in understanding the migratory history of populations,
offering a glimpse of connections of various human categories.
F. Species survival and evolution: Genetic variation Led to long-term
survival and evolution of species which could lead to survival of
organism and its aiding, with increasing the tolerance of specific
ethnics to specific disease than other organisms of typical
species as the various organism survives.
Disadvantages:
a) Genetic diseases and disorders: Genetic variation collaborates
into the occurrence of inherited genetic diseases and disorders as
some individuals could carry mutations which rise the risk of
cases for instance, cystic fibrosis, sickle cell anemia, or
Huntington’s disorder.
b) Population-specific health risks: Specific populations could
exhibit increased susceptibility to certain health risks because of
their genetic makeup. For instance, some races could have arisen
risk of specific types of cancer or metabolic diseases.
c) Reproductive challenges: Genetic variation might lead to
reproductive challenges, involving infertility or the arisen worry
of miscarriage. In specific conditions, certain genetic diversity
might effect on fertility and reproductive results.
d) Ethnic health tolerances: Genetic diversity collaborate for races
health disparities, impact the prevalence and severity of specific
diseases along different population categories which must be
understood to develop targeted medical interventions.
e) Difficulty in maintaining a cohesive population: Increased
diversity might lead to challenges in maintaining a cohesive
population which is due to wide range of genetic diversity makes
it challenging to publish shared characteristics which are
important for the overall population. Imagine a population of
plants with certain ecological role with increased genetic
diversity. Diversity in traits as growth rate, water usage, and
nutrient additions with arisen competition creates difficult for the
plants to publish a shared set of characteristics conducive to
their healthcare. This increasing variety might lead to more
competition for few resources. This could make it unable to
coexist peacefully in its natural niche.
Impact of solution:
Impact of Pharmacogenomics Economically:
Firstly, the economic advantages which is that Pharmacogenomics
could help in a cost-effective health treatment that PGx and
precision medicine help in improvement of drug efficiency and
decreasing side effects, with having substantial savings indicated
by eliminating the cost of the failed treatment as in the past many
treatments were used on the patient until one treatment have an
effect, in addition, to the medical tests provided during this period
without having scientific evidence for the needed treatment, as PGx
have a potential economic value while testing in clinical practice as
through estimation through asthma patients indicated a potential
cost-saving as when the hypothetical Pharmacogenomics tests the
determination of preferred initial therapy, through comparison the
annual costs per patients under the two clinical techniques (using
Pharmacogenomics to treating and genetic prior- none testing) and
in general the in the testing strategy the patients pay lower cost
range of distribution, as through the Testing strategy a cost-saving
estimation was provided from 200$ USD to 767$ USD, as
Pharmacogenomics prevent the choice of wrong treatment,
diagnosis and are key parameters in the economic reliability in
clinical practices. Through 38 studies, as most studies of
Pharmacogenomics clinical practices involve cost-utility analysis,
univariate and probabilistic sensitivity analysis, and discussing
strengths of economic analysis even with the cost of the PGx
testing, with cost-effectiveness estimations and motives for
economic choice models as one study by Thermo Fisher Scientific
journal estimated that Pharmacogenomics decrease emergency and
hospitalization utilization for almost $2K USD along 6-month follow-
up per mental patient, and as Pharmacogenomics implicated on
psychiatric drug selection on treatment adherence investigated a
cost saving among 560$ USD per dollar during 4-month follow-up
period, and for polypharmacy patients, Pharmacogenomics
estimated saving around $4K USD per patient, another review
conducted in 2022 indicated that Pharmacogenomics drug
recommendation by the Clinical Pharmacogenetic Implementation
Consortium (CPIC) guidelines estimated that 71% of 108 evaluated
studies reported the cost-effective of the PGx, as
pharmacogenomics-indicate comprehensive treatment manipulation
system and reported a decrease of 32$ USD in direct medical
charges along the first 32 months of the usage of PGx guided
patient group (around 5000 patient). As in conclusion, the
application of Pharmacogenomics is found as cost-effective and
cost-saving technique beside its medical benefits, and the quality of
the associated characteristics, improving future evaluations,
scenario evaluations involving a broad range of PGx tests costs with
lower costs of failed treatments, diagnosis and paid ineffective
treatments used as the Pharmacogenomics save all of these costs
respectively which help the patient to have a better medical
experience by shortening the time of treatment in most cases and
by having the relevance medical medication based on the genes of
the patient, in addition, to decrease the cost of the medication
journey so, the patient could pay it easily without any financial
obstacles by saving money as possible for the treatment for all
people in different social classes which is states by the National
Institute of Health that pharmacogenomics saves about 3962$ USD
per patient annually.
Secondly, the cons of the Pharmacogenomics are very limited
related to lack of saving costs in one situation which is to reject
taking the Pharmacogenomics due to ethical concerns, privacy and
security concerns about personal information which depends on the
patient desire which could eliminate the cost-effective savings
gained by the PGx. However, the Pharmacogenomics have some
economic challenges as the initial implementation costs and
reference qualifications for setting up the testing construction as it
needs high modern costing equipment from the laboratory or the
health ministry or even the clinical infrastructure, in addition, to the
need of the specialized health care professionals to interpret the
genetic information to phenotypic data as it constitutes a financial
burden on the health authority, as according to the Clinical
Pharmacogenetic Implementation Consortium (CPIC) guidelines
estimated that 29% of the same studies indicated above had no
cost-effectiveness or were uncertain as the PGx isn’t always cost-
effective. Finally, some patients don’t have the financial ability to
pay the costs of the pharmacogenetic tests which is about 2000$
USD even with its discount rates which rates 3%, with total costs
between the range 44,697$ USD, and 47,295$ USD this range
include 2918$ USD savings by PGx and its discounts and 1,680$ USD
as an indirect cost. As PGx tests to present is expensive, in addition,
to specialists which could be passed by ministries but people can’t
even pay the PGx tests and can’t even pay the traditional treatment
which cause another problem for these people but by consideration
most people benefit from the pharmacogenomics.
(The Health Benefits and Economic Value of Pharmacogenomics, 2023) (Stallings SC, Huse D,
Finkelstein SN, Crown WH, Witt WP, Maguire J, Hiller AJ, Sinskey AJ, Ginsburg
GS., 2006) (Elizabeth J. J. Berm, Margot de Looff, Bob Wilffert, Cornelis
Boersma, Lieven Annemans, Stefan Vegter, Job F. M. van Boven and Maarten
J. Postma, 2016) (Groessl EJ, Tally SR, Hillery N, Maciel A, Garces JA., 2018)
(Maciel A, Cullors A, Lukowiak AA, Garces J., 2018)