Scribd
Upload
16 views2 pages

Project Feedback Sheet - 2024 Copy 2

Uploaded by

bhattibaba118
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
16 views2 pages

Project Feedback Sheet - 2024 Copy 2

Uploaded by

bhattibaba118
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

ICT619 Final Project Feedback Sheet

STUDENT NAME/S: OVERALL MARK: 60


Muhammad Hammad Anwer

Score Comment
Problem formulation and focus of the
report (20%) 15
• Title and abstract are clear
Content base filtering can be further explained and explaining how you can use it or
• Problem domain is clear
• Provide relevant background and used it in the product clearly. Allowing the reader to understand what has been done. It
reference to understand the is not clear on what is done in the product.
problem
• Provide understanding what prior
techniques have been used on such
a problem
• Why the developed product
requires AI technique to help?

AI solution (35%) Content delivery and recommendation systems are similar?


• Provide good justification of the Have you tested with other models? It is not shown in the product. What is the reason for
choices of the AI techniques
27 Figure 2. How does the Figure 6 working, there is no proper explanation on how the data
• Provide good and detail explanation
of the AI techniques used – collection getting the data and how does the recommendation work. Where should the input
including steps, pre-processing, come?
parameters used etc (explain why)
• Any optimisation used? Provide
understanding of why these are
needed
• Provide a product demo video? (if
no product demo video provided -
deduct 20%)

Evaluation and results discussion – Where is the proper evaluation? There is no comparison of each model or approach. There
(20%) is not evaluation metrics given.
• How good are the AI solutions
evaluated?
10
• Are the results presented in
appropriate format? Are the
evaluation metrics used appropriate
and why?
• Clear and detail discussions
presented. Any explanation of the
comparison done?
• Good conclusions presented from
the comparison results
• Any remarks that the developed
product could be improved? Any
limitations described?

User guide and code/model provided There is no user guide provided to the user.
(15%) 0
• Is the user guide clear and can
the models be duplicated?
• Code/model submitted? Code
easily understood?
• Any figure or screen shots?
Content and format (10%) Document can have a good structure and the references should be named and separated as a
• Spelling and grammar 8 section.
• Clear and easy to follow format
• References provided are
appropriate
• (if the requirements listed in the
project sheet are not meet, deduct
10%)

Group Declaration Form

• If this is not found, no marking


will be done
• The following will not apply if all
are declared equal and has been
verified that the tasks are reasonable

M = GroupMark x TeamSize x
YourWeighting

• YourMark = MIN(M,
GroupMark+10, 100)

• If the team does not include Group Declaration form, the project will not be marked.
• If the code and the demo is not working, 50% of the total mark will be deducted.

You might also like