Fall 24 MATH116 DFNCourseoutline
Fall 24 MATH116 DFNCourseoutline
Office: Department of Mathematics and Computer Sciences, 114-8 Maher Hall, Dobbs Ferry
Office Hours: Tuesday: 2:00 – 2:30, Wednesday: 4:00 – 5:00, Friday: 2:00 – 2:30, or by
appointment
E-mail: [email protected]
Course Description:
This course is intended for business, computer, mathematics and science majors. Emphasis is
placed on varied methods and manipulations. Algebraic techniques that have applications in
the student’s anticipated area of specialization are studied. Topics will include linear and
quadratic equations; inequalities; graphing; polynomials; factoring; operations with rational and
irrational expressions; systems of linear equations and others. 4 sem. hrs per week. 3 crs.
Prerequisites
Fundamental arithmetic skills are a prerequisite for this course. Opportunities to review these
skills are also provided. Basic computer skills are also required. Strong motivation and self-
directed learning are essential for success in this course.
Course Philosophy
This This course is designed on the following principles:
Active learning through practice is more effective than passive learning through
listening.
Students can progress at their own pace, studying ahead of scheduled topics and
meeting pre-set due dates.
The learning process is conducted through a web-based application, requiring an
internet connection and a personal device for access.
Learning materials are organized into modules that include readings, video clips,
practice exercises, assignments, and tests.
Students receive immediate feedback on their work from the web application and can
also receive personalized assistance from instructors and/or peer tutors in the lab.
Learning Goals
1. Algebraic Modeling: Utilize algebra to construct mathematical models that accurately
represent real-world scenarios.
2. Higher-Level Mathematics Preparation: Equip students with the necessary algebraic
foundation for advanced mathematics courses, such as pre-calculus, statistics, and
computer science.
3. Logical and Quantitative Skills Enhancement: Foster students' logical reasoning,
quantitative analysis, and critical thinking abilities through exposure to algebraic
problem-solving techniques.
4. Mathematical Understanding through Communication: Enhance students'
comprehension of mathematical concepts by incorporating writing assignments and oral
presentations.
5. Problem-Solving and Inquiry: Develop students' ability to formulate meaningful
questions that address mathematical problems and issues.
6. Reasonableness Assessment: Train students to evaluate and verify the plausibility of
mathematical results through estimation and reasonableness checks.
7. Symbolic, Visual, and Verbal Representation: Encourage students to represent
mathematical information using a variety of formats, including symbolic notation, visual
diagrams, numerical data, and verbal explanations.
Required Material
Scientific calculator (TI-83+ graphing calculator is acceptable). Cell phone calculators are
strongly discouraged and prohibited during tests.
Notebook and pen/pencil.
ALEKS: This course utilizes McGraw-Hill's online program, ALEKS. The program link and
registration instructions will be provided on Mercy Blackboard. There's no need to
purchase a course or access code specifically for this class.
In general, assessments may include, but are not limited to, the following components:
o Weekly assignments in ALEKS
o Proctored Exam 1, 2, and 3
o Proctored cumulative final exam.
Academic Dishonesty
Students are expected to adhere to the Mercy University Academic Integrity Policy, which can
be found at the end of this syllabus. Academic integrity entails conducting scholarly activities in
an honest, truthful, and responsible manner. Students must maintain honesty and ethical
conduct in all aspects of their academic work and obligations. Dishonest actions in academic
pursuits will not be tolerated. Academic dishonesty jeopardizes the University's educational
mission and the student's personal and intellectual development. In cases of academic
dishonesty, the University imposes penalties ranging from failing an assignment to suspension
or expulsion, depending on the severity and recurrence of the offense(s). Aside from deceiving
fellow classmates, dishonest academic work, including plagiarism, deprives students of the
course's benefits and significantly impacts their overall grade. If you are unsure whether your
work constitutes academic dishonesty, please contact the instructor for clarification. Students
should be aware that plagiarism is readily detectable through various resources available to
university professors.
Most importantly,
Show Your Work: The methodology employed to arrive at a solution is of equal
significance to the solution itself. In all assignments, students must demonstrate the
thought process leading to the answer, not merely provide the answer. This practice
enables students to receive partial credit even if the final answer is incorrect, provided
that the reasoning is sound.
Keep Your Work: Retain all your work in a notebook, as reviewing it later serves as an
excellent method of preparation for subsequent tests and the final examination.
Test 1 (Review opens between September 28th and October 8th in ALEKS, the test will be
held on October 8th)
Test 3 (Review opens between November 27th and December 6th in ALEKS, the test will be
held on December 3rd)
Final Exam (Review opens between December 11th and December 20th in ALEKS, the test will
be held on December 17th)
Dishonest acts in a student’s academic pursuits will not be tolerated. Academic dishonesty
undermines the University’s educational mission as well as the student’s personal and
intellectual growth. In cases where academic dishonesty is uncovered, the University imposes
sanctions that range from failure of an assignment to suspension and expulsion from the
University, depending on the severity and reoccurrence of the case(s).
Examples of academic dishonesty include, but are not limited to, cheating, plagiarism, obtaining
an unfair advantage, and falsification of records and official documents.
Cheating is the unauthorized use or attempted use of material, information, notes, study aids,
devices, communication, or artificial intelligence tools during an academic exercise. Examples of
cheating include, but are not limited to:
Copying from another student during an examination or allowing another to copy your
work
Providing assistance to acts of academic misconduct.
Unauthorized collaboration on a take-home assignment or examination
Using notes during a closed book examination
Submitting another’s work as your own.
Submitting material generated or altered by chatbots and/or artificial intelligence tools
as your own.
Unauthorized use during an examination of any electronic device, such as cell phones,
computers, or internet access to retrieve or send information.
Allowing others to research or write assigned papers for you or to complete your
assigned projects.
Plagiarism is the act of presenting ideas, research, or writings created by other people or
artificial intelligence tools as your own.
Examples of plagiarism include, but are not limited to:
Copying another person’s actual words or images without the use of quotation marks
and citations attributing the words to their source
Presenting another person’s ideas or theories in your own words without
acknowledging the source
Engaging in plagiarism, via the Internet or other web-based or electronic sources, which
includes (but is not limited to) purchasing of, downloading term papers or other
assignments and then submitting that work as one’s own, copying text generated by a
chatbot or artificial intelligence tool, or copying or extracting information and then
pasting that information into an assignment without citing the source, or without
providing proper attribution
Self-Plagiarism is the act of turning in one’s own work (papers, exams, cases, etc.) in its original
form or with only minor modifications in more than one course for academic credit. Self-
Plagiarism is a violation of this policy.
Obtaining an unfair advantage is any action taken by a student that gives that student an unfair
advantage, or through which the students attempt to gain an unfair advantage in their academic
work over another student. Examples of obtaining an unfair advantage include, but are not
limited to:
Gaining advance access to examination materials by stealing or reproducing those
materials
Retaining, purchasing, sharing, or posting examinations, or the students’ written work,
like cases, papers, etc., without explicit faculty permission
Intentionally obstructing or interfering with another student’s work
Falsification of Records and Official Documents include, but are not limited to, acts of forging
authorized signatures or falsifying information on an official academic record.
A faculty member who suspects that a student has committed a violation of the Academic
Integrity Policy shall review with the student the facts and circumstances of the suspected
violation whenever feasible.
Should the faculty member conclude that there has been an incident
of academic dishonesty, they shall complete the Academic Integrity Reporting Form (located on
Mercy Connect under the faculty tab) and submit it. This form will include a sanction.
The form will be submitted electronically to the Dean and Associate Dean of the appropriate
School, and an initial notification of violation will be sent to the student. The student may
appeal to the Dean or Associate Dean of the School through email within one week of the date
of notification. The Dean or Associate Dean will then ask the student and faculty member to
submit evidence and may request to meet with both parties separately. After a review of the
evidence, the Dean or Associate Dean shall decide to either uphold or overturn the charge and
communicate the decision through an email to the student within one week of the appeal.
Should the student appeal, the Associate Provost for Faculty Affairs shall request evidence from
the student and the faculty member. After a review of the evidence, the Associate Provost for
Faculty Affairs shall determine if there is enough evidence to convene the Academic Appeals
Committee and send a letter to the student within one week to inform the student of this
determination. Should the case go to a full review, the Associate Provost for Faculty Affairs shall
assemble the Academic Appeals Committee to review the case.
At this point, all parties will be permitted to participate and are permitted to submit any
additional documentation they believe is necessary including written statements and
documentary evidence. The Academic Appeals Committee shall convene within two weeks of
the filing of the appeal submission. and shall issue a written decision of its finding within one
week of convening. The Associate Provost for Faculty Affairs shall send copies of its decision to
the accused student, the faculty member, and the appropriate Dean and Associate Dean for
archiving in the student’s confidential academic integrity record. Unless the resolution
exonerates the student, the Student Violation of the Academic Integrity Form shall be placed in
a confidential academic integrity file created for the purposes of identifying repeat violations,
gathering data, and assessing and reviewing policies.
If the Academic Appeals Committee finds that no violation occurred, the Office of the Provost
shall remove all material relating to that incident from the student’s confidential academic
integrity file and destroy the material. The Dean or Associate Dean shall work with the faculty
member to remove the sanction in the course.
This policy applies to all course delivery modalities including online courses.
If a faculty member believes that the appropriate sanction is academic in nature (e.g., a reduced
grade) and the student does not contest either their guilt or the particular reduced grade that
the faculty member has chosen, then the student shall be given either a warning or the reduced
grade, unless the student is a repeat offender, in which case a sanction more severe than a
warning should be applied by the Dean/ Associate Dean. The reduced grade may apply to the
particular assignment where the violation occurred or to the course grade, at the faculty
member’s discretion. A reduced grade may be an “F”, or another grade that is lower than the
grade that the student would have earned but for the violation. If a faculty member determines
that a student has committed an act of cheating or plagiarism, and the student withdraws from
the course, that student will receive an “FW” for the course regardless of the time of
withdrawal. The faculty member shall inform the Dean/ Associate Dean of the resolution via
email and the Dean/ Associate Dean shall update the applicable Student Violation of
the Academic Integrity Policy Form to reflect that resolution.
In a case where a student admits to the alleged academic dishonesty but contests the
academic sanction imposed by the faculty member, or in a case where a student denies the
academic dishonesty, the student may appeal by following the process described below.
Judicial Sanctions
In a case where the allegation of cheating or plagiarism is severe, or where the student has a
history of violations of the Academic Integrity Policy which conduct warrants suspension or
expulsion from the University, the school Dean shall impose a sanction in addition to or in lieu
of academic sanctions, as they deem is warranted under the circumstances. If the student
contests the judicial sanction imposed, the student may appeal to the Associate Provost for
Faculty Affairs.