AGTM10 19 Guide To Traffic Management Part 10 Traffic Control and Communication Devices
AGTM10 19 Guide To Traffic Management Part 10 Traffic Control and Communication Devices
Sydney 2019
Guide to Traffic Management Part 10: Traffic Control and Communication Devices
Edition 2.1 amendments prepared by: Jeanette Ward, Chris Hall, Jamie Publisher
Robertson, Paul Durdin and Dave Smith
Austroads Ltd.
Edition 2.0 prepared by: David Green Level 9, 287 Elizabeth Street
Sydney NSW 2000 Australia
Edition 2.1 project manager: Jeremy Burdan Phone: +61 2 8265 3300
Edition 2.0 project manager: Fergus Tate [email protected]
www.austroads.com.au
Abstract
The Austroads Guide to Traffic Management consists of 13 parts and
provides comprehensive coverage of traffic management guidance for About Austroads
practitioners involved in traffic engineering, road design, town planning and
road safety. Austroads is the peak organisation of Australasian
road transport and traffic agencies.
Part 10: Traffic Control and Communication Devices is concerned with the
tools that are required for traffic management and traffic control within a Austroads’ purpose is to support our member
network. It covers the various control devices used to regulate and guide organisations to deliver an improved Australasian
traffic, including signs, traffic signals, pavement markings, delineators, and road transport network. To succeed in this task, we
traffic islands. Other devices and technologies that convey information and undertake leading-edge road and transport
guidance to road users while they are active in traffic are also included. research which underpins our input to policy
development and published guidance on the
Part 10 provides guidance on the design and use of particular traffic control design, construction and management of the road
devices that are applied to achieve or implement traffic management and network and its associated infrastructure.
control measures. It provides advice on the functions, suitability and correct
use of devices to create a more efficient and safer road traffic environment for Austroads provides a collective approach that
all users in permanent or temporary situations. delivers value for money, encourages shared
knowledge and drives consistency for road users.
Keywords Austroads is governed by a Board consisting of
Traffic control, traffic control devices, traffic management, traffic sign, traffic senior executive representatives from each of its
signal, signal timing, pavement marking, rumble strip, variable message sign, eleven member organisations:
delineation, marker post, traffic island, local area traffic management,
• Roads and Maritime Services New South Wales
construction site
• Roads Corporation Victoria
Edition 2.2 published February 2019 • Queensland Department of Transport and Main
Roads
Edition 2.1 published January 2017
• Main Roads Western Australia
Edition 2.0 published August 2016 • Department of Planning, Transport and
Infrastructure South Australia
Edition 1.0 published August 2009
• Department of State Growth Tasmania
Edition 2.2 of the Guide has been updated with Safe System content,
including: • Department of Infrastructure, Planning and
• New Section 1.4 Traffic Control and Communication and the Safe System Logistics Northern Territory
• Additional Safe System content in Sections 2.3.1, 3, 4, 4.1, 5, 5.6.1, 5.6.6, • Transport Canberra and City Services
5.6.9, 6.1, 8, 8.2.2, 8.4.3, 9, 9.1.2 and 10.1 Directorate, Australian Capital Territory
• Updating the reference list and cross references throughout. • The Department of Infrastructure, Regional
Development and Cities
Acknowledgements
First edition prepared by Gary Veith, Peter Croft, Robert Morgan and Agasteena Shah; and project managed by John Erceg.
This Guide is produced by Austroads as a general guide. Its application is discretionary. Road authorities may vary their practice
according to local circumstances and policies. Austroads believes this publication to be correct at the time of printing and does not
accept responsibility for any consequences arising from the use of information herein. Readers should rely on their own skill and
judgement to apply information to particular issues.
Guide to Traffic Management Part 10: Traffic Control and Communication Devices
Contents
1. Introduction............................................................................................................................................. 1
1.1 Scope and Context ................................................................................................................................... 1
1.2 Traffic Control Devices – Definitions and Functions ................................................................................ 3
1.3 Purpose and Use of the Guide ................................................................................................................. 3
1.3.1 Structure of the Guide ................................................................................................................ 4
1.3.2 Jurisdictional Supplements ......................................................................................................... 4
1.3.3 Emerging Technologies .............................................................................................................. 4
1.4 Traffic Control and Communication Devices and the Safe System ......................................................... 4
1.5 Australian/New Zealand Standards .......................................................................................................... 6
1.6 Road Rules and Traffic Control Devices .................................................................................................. 7
Tables
Table 1.1: Parts of the Guide to Traffic Management ..................................................................................... 2
Table 1.2: Other standards and specifications that relate to traffic control devices ....................................... 7
Table 3.1: Key principles and guidelines to consider when implementing pedestrian wayfinding signage ..20
Table 4.1: Legibility distance of letters .......................................................................................................... 39
Table 4.2: Typical direction sign treatments at motorway interchange exits ................................................45
Table 4.3: Longitudinal location of warning signs ......................................................................................... 46
Table 5.1: Examples of pictograms for various purposes ............................................................................. 58
Table 5.2: Key findings on vehicle activated signs on the approach to intersections and curves ................74
Table 5.3: Proposed ESL size requirements................................................................................................. 80
Table 6.1: Australian Standards which refer to materials for raised pavement markers ..............................85
Table 6.2: Legal significance of barrier lines ................................................................................................. 87
Table 6.3: Pavement colours for special-use facilities ................................................................................ 105
Table 8.1: Signal face functions .................................................................................................................. 136
Table 8.2: Visual coverage of lanterns ........................................................................................................ 142
Table 8.3: Recommended aiming distances ............................................................................................... 143
Table 8.4: Cut-off angles for visors ............................................................................................................. 147
Table 8.5: Signal face layouts with arrow and cross aspects for overhead lane controls ..........................158
Figures
Figure 3.1: Typical route overview plan.......................................................................................................... 15
Figure 3.2: Destinations for signs on motorways in Melbourne ..................................................................... 16
Figure 3.3: Destinations for rural M, A and B routes in Victoria ..................................................................... 16
Figure 3.4: Example of draft intersection direction sign layout....................................................................... 18
Figure 3.5: Example of a reassurance direction sign plan ............................................................................. 19
Figure 3.6: Example of a checklist for route audits ........................................................................................ 22
Figure 4.1: Red background used to emphasise a potential hazard .............................................................. 34
Figure 4.2: An example of a drawing for a made-to-measure intersection direction sign (G2-1) ..................36
Figure 4.3: Sign legibility distance .................................................................................................................. 37
Figure 5.1: Cantilever-mounted VMS displaying a typical message .............................................................. 53
Figure 5.2: Example of a pictogram and text-based VMS .............................................................................. 56
Figure 5.3: Example of travel time information being displayed on a multipurpose VMS which
may also display incident messages ............................................................................................ 65
Figure 5.4: Trip information sign ..................................................................................................................... 65
Figure 5.5: Trip condition sign ........................................................................................................................ 66
Figure 5.6: Example of an arterial road VMS providing advance motorway condition
information.................................................................................................................................... 66
Figure 5.7: Motorway condition sign ............................................................................................................... 67
Figure 5.8: Example of electronic ramp control sign messages..................................................................... 68
Figure 5.9: Overhead signals for lane reversal .............................................................................................. 70
Figure 5.10: Speed indicator system on a motorway ....................................................................................... 71
Figure 5.11: Vehicle activated warning sign for trucks ..................................................................................... 72
Figure 5.12: Example of VMS at an intersection on a divided rural arterial road .............................................73
Figure 5.13: Examples of vehicle activated signs on an approach to a curve in the form of a
CMS and VMS application ........................................................................................................... 73
Figure 5.14: Passenger information sign at a bus stop .................................................................................... 75
Figure 5.15: Dynamic fairway sign in Melbourne ............................................................................................. 75
Figure 5.16: Parking guidance sign .................................................................................................................. 77
Figure 5.17: Electronic speed limit sign in use ................................................................................................. 78
Figure 5.18: ESL above each lane of the carriageway to indicate the limit .....................................................79
Figure 6.1: Examples of transition lines ......................................................................................................... 90
Figure 6.2: Marking of bicycle lane with continuity line through minor intersection .......................................92
Figure 6.3: Example of a discontinuous thermoplastic audio-tactile edge line ..............................................93
Figure 6.4: Audio-tactile edge lines on a motorway ....................................................................................... 94
Figure 6.5: Example of bicycle-lane markings................................................................................................ 96
Figure 6.6: Typical stop line and give-way line treatments at kerbed intersections .......................................98
Figure 6.7: Typical give-way lines on roads that have shoulders................................................................... 99
Figure 6.8: Marked foot crossing line markings at a signalised intersection ................................................100
Figure 6.9: Pedestrian (zebra) crossing line markings ................................................................................. 101
Figure 6.10: Example of children’s crossing line markings – this one accompanied by post and
flag .............................................................................................................................................. 101
Figure 6.11: An example of the use of turning lines at an intersection ..........................................................102
Figure 6.12: Example of zig-zag road marking on the approach to a pedestrian (zebra) crossing ...............105
Figure 6.13: Examples of perceptual pavement markings ............................................................................. 111
Figure 7.1: A typical guide post .................................................................................................................... 112
Figure 8.1: Signal aspects currently in use .................................................................................................. 115
Figure 8.2: Arrow aspect orientations ........................................................................................................... 116
Figure 8.3: Basic three-aspect signal face layout ........................................................................................ 117
Figure 8.4: Six-aspect multi-column signal face layouts .............................................................................. 117
Figure 8.5: Four-aspect single-column signal face layouts .......................................................................... 118
Figure 8.6: Two-aspect signal face layouts .................................................................................................. 118
Figure 8.7: Five-aspect signal face layout with yellow and green right-turn arrow aspects .........................119
Figure 8.8: Five-aspect signal face layout with red and yellow right-turn aspects .......................................119
Figure 8.9: Four-aspect signal face layouts with single right-turn green arrow aspect ................................120
Figure 8.10: Four-aspect signal face layout with single right-turn red arrow aspect ......................................120
Figure 8.11: Five-aspect signal face layout with yellow and green left-turn arrow aspects ...........................121
Figure 8.12: Five-aspect signal face layout with red and yellow left-turn arrow aspects ...............................121
Figure 8.13: Four-aspect signal face layout with single left-turn green arrow aspect ....................................121
Figure 8.14: Four-aspect signal face layout with single left-turn red arrow aspect ........................................121
Figure 8.15: Permitted signal face layouts ..................................................................................................... 122
Figure 8.16: Signal face layouts that are permitted but should be avoided if possible ..................................123
Figure 8.17: Basic display sequence for three-aspect signals ....................................................................... 124
Figure 8.18: Examples of fully-controlled right-turn display sequences for six-aspect arrangements ...........125
Figure 8.19: Examples of display sequences to initiate an arrow-controlled right-turn movement ................126
Figure 8.20: Examples of display sequences to terminate an arrow-controlled right-turn movement ...........126
Figure 8.21: Display sequences for four-aspect arrangement with single red right-turn arrow
aspect for the protection of pedestrians or special vehicles ......................................................127
Figure 8.22: Partially controlled right turn....................................................................................................... 128
Figure 8.23: Partially controlled turn with red arrow drop-out ........................................................................ 129
Figure 8.24: Examples of display sequences to initiate an arrow-controlled left-turn movement ..................130
Figure 8.25: Examples of display sequences to terminate an arrow-controlled left-turn movement .............130
Figure 8.26: Display sequences for four-aspect arrangement with single red left-turn arrow
aspect for the protection of pedestrians or special vehicles ......................................................131
Figure 8.27: Pedestrian traffic signal sequence incorporating the pedestrian countdown timer....................132
Figure 8.28: Designation of signal faces ........................................................................................................ 135
Figure 8.29: Signal face visibility templates ................................................................................................... 139
Figure 8.30: Signal face location for channelised left-turn control ................................................................. 140
Figure 8.31: Signal face location for channelised right-turn treatment (seagull) ............................................140
Figure 8.32: T-intersection signal location...................................................................................................... 141
Figure 8.33: Typical layouts for mid-block pedestrian operated signals as used by VicRoads .....................144
Figure 8.34: A typical signal mounting arrangement as used by VicRoads ...................................................145
Figure 8.35: Alternative formats for advance warning signals ....................................................................... 148
Figure 8.36: Advance warning signal signs in use ......................................................................................... 148
Figure 8.37: A flashing red signal face which may be used at emergency vehicle facilities ..........................150
Figure 8.38: Roundabout metering signals .................................................................................................... 153
Figure 8.39: Seagull T-intersection geometry and signal phasing ................................................................. 154
Figure 8.40: Examples of staggered T-intersection and motorway diamond interchange .............................155
Figure 8.41: Example of an intersection with more than four legs ................................................................. 156
Figure 8.42: Example of LUMS in action ........................................................................................................ 157
Figure 8.43: Typical entry freeway ramp signals for two lanes metered ........................................................162
Figure 8.44: Typical entry freeway ramp signals for two lanes metered plus metered priority lane ..............163
Figure 8.45: Typical freeway ramp signal for two lanes metered plus freeflow priority lane ..........................164
Figure 8.46: Stop here on red signal (R6-6) and stop here on red arrow (R6-14) signs ...............................169
Figure 8.47: Give-way to pedestrians (R2-10) sign ........................................................................................ 169
Figure 8.48: Pedestrian scramble-crossing (R3-5) sign for use on the left hand side of the crossing...........170
Figure 8.49: Signs to control turning movements at signalised intersections ................................................170
Figure 8.50: Supplementary time-of-operation plates for part-time turn bans (R9-1) ....................................171
Figure 8.51: Supplementary plates excepting special vehicles from turn bans .............................................171
Figure 8.52: U-turn permitted (R2-15) sign .................................................................................................... 172
Figure 8.53: Left turn on red permitted after stopping (R2-20) sign ............................................................... 172
Figure 8.54: Hook turn sign ............................................................................................................................ 173
Figure 8.55: Traffic signals ahead (W3-3) sign .............................................................................................. 173
Figure 9.1: Wide centreline treatment example ........................................................................................... 177
Figure 9.2: Wide centreline treatment with wire rope barrier installed .........................................................178
Figure 9.3: Island that can be moved remotely from a traffic management centre ......................................179
1. Introduction
The structure and content of the 13 Parts of the Guide to Traffic Management is discussed in Introduction to
Traffic Management Part 1 (Austroads 2019a). The 13 Parts are outlined in Table 1.1.
Traffic Control and Communication Devices Part 10 addresses the tools that are required for traffic
management and traffic control within a network. Part 10 provides guidance on the design and use of
particular traffic control and communication devices that are applied to achieve and/or implement various
traffic management and control measures described in:
• Guide to Traffic Management Part 4 (Austroads 2016c) which is concerned with the overall operational
improvement needs of the road network as a whole.
• Guide to Traffic Management Part 5 (Austroads 2019b) which deals in detail with mid-block traffic
management issues that apply to individual lengths of road.
• Guide to Traffic Management Part 6 (Austroads 2019c) which deals with traffic management issues and
solutions at particular intersections, interchanges and crossings.
• Guide to Traffic Management Part 9 (Austroads 2019d) which covers the operational management of
road space for all users and describes current practice for common systems including traffic signals (both
at intersections and entry ramps to motorways), overhead lane control signals (including lane use
management systems (LUMS) which incorporate lane control signals (LCS) and electronic speed limits
(ESL) within the one signal), variable message signs (VMS) and other traveller information systems,
congestion management and incident management.
Communication devices in the context of traffic control are those that convey information or guidance to road
users for the purposes of traffic management. In addition to the basic devices of signs, signals, markings and
delineators, communications which may be considered under this definition include those by radio and
telephone, and digital transmissions via mobile phone, Internet and global positioning technologies. The
criteria for inclusion in this Guide are either:
• the device or transmission is visible or audible to road users while they are actively involved in traffic
• the information conveyed is directly related to the management of traffic for efficiency and safety.
For example, Cooperative Intelligent Transport Systems (C-ITS) type of information (C-ITS is an emerging
technology discussed in Section 10.2.2) are becoming important to traffic management and the associated
devices covered in this Guide, and will require interoperability between all devices. While, the C-ITS
information flow may not be visible or audible to road users they are directly related to the management of
traffic for efficiency and safety.
The Guide covers various traffic control devices that are suitable for use under different road conditions to
create a safer road environment for all users in temporary or permanent situations. The Guide provides a
means to ensure uniformity in traffic control and management, as it is essential that devices are located in a
uniform fashion to allow road users to react at different locations in a timely and similar manner to the same
device or group of devices.
The Guide should be read in conjunction with relevant standards relating to traffic control devices as they
specify essential requirements for the design, installation and practical application of the devices.
Practitioners should be familiar with all relevant Australian and New Zealand Standards.
A sound understanding of road rules is also critical. Practitioners must ensure that traffic management plans
and treatments, and associated traffic devices, are applied in a manner that is consistent with road law.
Knowledge of the rules will also ensure that new or amended traffic control devices are not applied in ways
that confuse drivers and compromise safety, or result in their unnecessarily receiving infringement notices.
Whilst an appropriately inscribed sign can be used to over-ride a statutory rule (e.g. parking distance from a
corner), the use of such signs may require particular approvals from the relevant road agencies.
The Guide discusses the principles and application of traffic control devices in Section 2 and outlines signing
and marking schemes in Section 3. The principles used for the application of the various types of traffic
control devices including static traffic signs (Section 4), electronic signs (Section 5), pavement markings
(Section 6), guide posts and delineators (Section 7), traffic signals (Section 8), traffic islands (Section 9) and
communication devices (Section 10) are discussed in the main body of this Guide.
Supplementing these sections are appendices that contain guidance on bicycle wayfinding signage and VMS
messages that is considered too lengthy or detailed to include in the body of the Guide.
In addition, there are several commentaries. The commentaries provide further information on items in the
text that was not considered appropriate to include in the body of the text or the appendices. This includes
information on route signage, static sign degradation monitoring, application of rumble strips and
jurisdictional guidance on rumble strips.
Jurisdictions may have variations to practices outlined in the Guide. These are typically contained in
supplements. Along with variations, jurisdictions may also maintain complementary material to that contained
in the Guide and the supplements. Readers should refer to the supplements for information on the
jurisdiction’s practice.
When applying the guidance, practitioners should also consider emerging technologies and how these may
impact on traffic control and communication devices in the future. For example, traffic controllers may be
integrated with Bluetooth readers and other broadcast technologies, and VMS may be integrated with
connected technologies in order to broadcast messages into the vehicle. While it may be difficult to predict
how prolific these technologies will be in the future, it is considered important that agencies plan for them
now, and implement technology that is potentially expandable in the future and can be retrofitted with
technologies as they emerge.
In addition, the National ITS Architecture (Austroads 2014c and 2014d will increasingly provide guidance
towards the development and deployment of interoperable ITS solutions, particularly information flows
between field devices (infrastructure), management centres and C-ITS technologies.
1.4 Traffic Control and Communication Devices and the Safe System
The Safe System is an approach to road safety that is the basis of strategies and action plans to reduce road
trauma in Australia and New Zealand. Ultimately the aim is to eliminate deaths and serious injuries resulting
from crashes on the road network.
As the name suggests, the Safe System is a systems approach which recognises that the components are
interrelated and must work together to achieve the desired goals. The four elements or pillars of a Safe
System are:
• Safe roads and roadsides – Roads should be designed, operated and maintained so that they are
predictable, self-explaining and encourage safe travel speeds. When a crash occurs, they should be
forgiving to ensure that the likelihood of death or serious injury is minimised.
• Safe speeds – Operating speeds should be managed so that crash likelihood is low and, in the event of
a crash, the impact forces are within human tolerances.
• Safe vehicles – Vehicles should incorporate design features and technology that minimise the likelihood
of crashes and protect road users (including pedestrians and cyclists) when crashes do occur. In the
past this technology has generally focused on minimising injury to vehicle occupants (seat belts, air
bags, etc) but in the future is likely to encompass more driver assistance features that help to prevent
crashes from occurring.
• Safe road users – All users should be alert, comply with road rules and engage in safe behaviour. They
are supported through education, information, enforcement of road rules, training and licensing.
Traffic control devices are essential elements of a safe road environment. They regulate traffic (including
pedestrian and bicycle traffic) and warn, inform and guide road users. They also play a significant role in
promoting safe speeds through physical measures (e.g. raised pavements, including speed humps), speed
limit signage and advisory speed signs.
Cooperative intelligent transport systems (C-ITS) have significant potential to improve vehicle safety through
emerging technologies that will enable information to be exchanged between vehicles (V2V), between
vehicles and roadside infrastructure (V2I) and between roadside infrastructure and vehicles (I2V).
All traffic control and communication devices have a critical role in relation to road user behaviour and the
safety of road users. To this end, it is essential that the design and use of traffic control and communication
devices takes into consideration road user factors to ensure that road users are able to correctly interpret the
information that is being presented and respond in an appropriate and timely manner.
The most relevant Australian Standard for traffic control devices is AS 1742 Manual of Uniform Traffic
Control Devices. AS 1742 takes account of recommendations on symbols given in the United Nations
Convention on Road Signs and Signals. It comprises the following 14 parts (Part 8 has been withdrawn):
1. AS 1742.1 General Introduction and Index of Signs
2. AS 1742.2 Traffic Control Devices for General Use
3. AS 1742.3 1 Traffic Control Devices for Works on Roads
4. AS 1742.4 Speed Controls
5. AS 1742.5 Street Name and Community Facility Name Signs
6. AS 1742.6 Tourist and Services Signs
7. AS 1742.7 Railway Crossings
8. AS 1742.8 (Withdrawn)
9. AS 1742.9 2 Bicycle Facilities
10. AS 1742.10 Pedestrian Control and Protection
11. AS 1742.11 Parking Controls
12. AS 1742.12 Bus, Transit, Tram and Truck Lanes
13. AS 1742.13 Local Area Traffic Management
14. AS 1742.14 Traffic Signals
15. AS 1742.15 Direction Signs, Information Signs and Route Numbering.
AS 1742 is supported by two other standards, one covering sign face layouts and their manufacture, and one
defining standard alphabets, namely:
1. AS 1743 Road Signs: Specifications
2. AS 1744 Standard Alphabets for Road Signs.
In New Zealand, requirements for traffic control devices are set out in the NZ Traffic Control Devices Manual
(NZ Transport Agency 2008), and in the Manual of Traffic Signs and Markings (MOTSAM), particularly:
1. Part 1 Traffic Signs (NZ Transport Agency 2010a)
2. Part 2 Markings (NZ Transport Agency 2010b).
Throughout this document, where reference is made to AS 1742, practitioners in New Zealand should also
refer to the relevant section in MOTSAM. It is noted however that MOTSAM is progressively being replaced
by the NZ Traffic Control Devices Manual.
In addition, practitioners engaged in traffic engineering and traffic management should be aware of other
standards and specifications that relate to traffic control devices. These are outlined in Table 1.2.
Table 1.2: Other standards and specifications that relate to traffic control devices
*AS 2342 is proposed to be withdrawn. Once withdrawn it is proposed that AS 1743 will cover the subject matter.
As the road rules are communicated to drivers through traffic control devices comprising signs and pavement
markings, Schedule 2 of the Australian Road Rules illustrates standard and commonly used regulatory signs
that relate to many of the rules. Schedule 3 illustrates ‘other permitted traffic signs’. These are alternative
signs to those shown in Schedule 2 and are allowed to be retained pending replacement. They are not
included in AS 1742.
In New Zealand road rules are set out in the Land Transport Rules, specifically the Land Transport (Road
User) Rule 2004 and the Land Transport Rule: Traffic Control Devices 2004. These provide rules for
compliance with regard to signs, markings and other devices. Details of traffic signs and their use are given
in MOTSAM: Part 1: Traffic Signs 3.
3 It is noted that MOTSAM is progressively being replaced by the NZ Traffic Control Devices Manual.
2.1 Uniformity
2.1.1 Importance
Uniformity means treating similar traffic situations in the same way. Standard traffic control devices help
drivers assess an unfamiliar situation. The uniform design and application of traffic control devices therefore
reduces the time a motorist needs to recognise and understand the message and to choose an appropriate
course of action. Ideally, the meaning of the message or symbol should be immediately apparent to drivers
so that their attention will be distracted for as little time as possible from other necessary decision-making.
Uniformity is essential to law enforcement and for traffic safety. Non-uniformity causes disrespect for the law
and can often create potentially dangerous traffic situations. Standardisation of traffic control devices also
reduces costs associated with their manufacture, installation, maintenance and administration.
The use of standard traffic control devices does not in itself constitute uniformity. To use a standard traffic
control device contrary to the intended application is equally as wrong as using a non-standard device where
a standard device is applicable.
Appropriate engineering studies should be carried out before a decision is taken to install a device. While
practical trials of devices in unusual situations may be worthwhile, they should be based on sound principles
and be closely monitored to evaluate the effects. Inappropriate use of traffic devices, including the use of
non-standard devices, can lead to disrespect and lack of observance by road users. Incorrect placement of
standard devices (e.g. too close to hazards or other traffic control devices or too remote to be effective) can
lead to the devices being missed or ignored.
2.2.2 Maintenance
Traffic control devices are important features of the road/traffic environment and require regular inspection
and maintenance to ensure their effectiveness in all operating conditions. A sign that appears in reasonable
condition by day may be deficient under night-time conditions due to aging or inappropriate repairs to the
sign face. Such deficiencies may only be detected through an inspection at night. A lack of maintenance can
lead to disrespect for a device and an ultimate reduction in safety.
The maintenance issue that is most prevalent with respect to the effectiveness of signs is the trimming of
trees and other vegetation. Road agencies should ensure that maintenance contractors and workers
regularly trim vegetation so that drivers are able to see and read road signs from an appropriate distance.
Where particular adverse environmental conditions such as fog, dust, or smoke are known to occur, special
compensatory measures may be needed to ensure the effectiveness of the device (e.g. the use of raised
pavement markers to supplement painted markings, or reduced spacing of guide posts and delineators).
Factors such as grade, sight distance and landscaping may have a significant effect on the size and position
of various devices.
Driver expectation, familiarity and knowledge about the devices and vehicle limitations are important
considerations in achieving consistent driver behaviour and responses to various traffic control devices.
Devices conveying the wrong message or more messages than a driver can readily assimilate, can also lead
to them being misinterpreted or missed.
The installation of traffic control devices will rarely be effective in alleviating problems that are essentially due
to deficiencies in geometric layout. Road safety audits (Austroads 2019e) are recommended throughout the
development of projects to ensure that designs are effective, and that appropriate use is made of traffic
control devices for each road or facility.
A related issue is the failure to remove signs when they are no longer appropriate, or at times when they do
not apply. For example, a slippery when wet sign should be removed after a road surface has been treated
to raise skid resistance to an acceptable level, and temporary roadworks signs (e.g. speed limit signs and
signs relating to workers on the road) should be removed during periods when they do not apply.
The use of signs and markings within the road environment should be consistent with the principles of a Safe
System approach (refer to Section 1.4). Providing a safer road environment involves application of road
design and traffic management principles with a clear safety focus.
Signs and road markings are often used to address inadequate design. For example, when an operational or
safety problem arises on a road network there is often a tendency for road managers to look to signs or
pavement markings as an immediate and cost-effective treatment. In some instances, these devices can be
part of the problem on the road system and therefore their use in some cases may not be in line with the
Safe System approach. The Safe System approach places an obligation on road agencies to consider
design options that will contribute to the elimination of deaths and serious injuries. The Safe System
Assessment Framework (Austroads 2016b) provides a methodology to assess project options to determine
the extent to which they align with Safe System objectives.
The following principles provide for the proper and efficient use of devices (Freeman 1996) in accordance
with the Safe System approach:
• External pressures for installation of a particular device should not absolve traffic engineers from
determining and recommending a more effective solution to a problem.
• Signs or markings can seldom be used to solve problems caused by poor and confusing road geometry.
• Like situations should be treated in a like manner, and standard devices should always be used unless it
can be clearly demonstrated that they do not fit the case.
• All devices should be properly maintained and replaced when worn out, particularly reflective devices.
• Devices should be installed according to guides and warrants. However, a device should not necessarily
be installed simply because a guide or warrant is met.
• Excessive use of signs should be avoided as this can cause visual clutter, and driver confusion or
information overload. The following questions should always be asked:
– Are certain signs really needed?
– Do they serve any practical function?
– Can they be read and acted upon by a driver?
– Can an excessive number of signs be replaced by a smaller number of larger signs that are more
rationally designed and located?
– Is a particular type of sign being used so often for purposes of lesser importance that its value in
solving more serious problems is degraded?
• Signs need to be of an adequate size and properly located so that drivers can read and act the message.
• Signs and devices should provide for adequate advance warning of hazards or decision points, not
forgetting that the hazard or decision point itself needs to be adequately delineated.
• Complexity in the design of word messages and symbols should be avoided. Symbols that have not been
tested in accordance with AS 2342 should not be used. Symbols should not have excessive detail, as this
will often operate against their effectiveness.
• The limitations on a driver’s ability to see and/or read messages conveyed by pavement markings under
certain geometric road conditions (e.g. around curves, on crest vertical curves) should be recognised.
• Total reliance on pavement markings to guide or control drivers at locations of special hazard should be
avoided (e.g. hazard markers may also be required to delineate an obstruction or road narrowing).
• Structures supporting signs should not be potential roadside hazards in themselves. Frangible 4 supports
should be provided, or the structure shielded using an approved safety barrier.
4 Frangible supports are those designed to collapse on impact. The severity of potential injuries to the occupants of an impacting
vehicle is reduced, compared to those that could occur if the supports was unyielding. Practitioners should refer to their own
jurisdiction guidance on frangible posts in addition to the Austroads Guide to Road Design Parts 6 and 6B, and the Guide to Road
Safety Part 9. Examples of jurisdictional guidance on frangible posts is outlined in Commentary 1.
[see Commentary 1]
2.3.2 Considerations for Older Road Users and People with Disabilities
The road design and traffic management needs of older drivers using Australian roads have been the subject
of research (Fildes et al. 2001). As people age, they experience decreasing physical and mental capabilities
and become more susceptible to injury and shock. Human functions subject to deterioration due to ageing
include:
• visual acuity
• attention capacity
• reaction time
• contrast sensitivity.
In relation to traffic management, people with disabilities must have equitable access to all transport services
and therefore be considered in the development of all transport and traffic management proposals and
treatments. Guidance devices serve to warn people with limited or no sight, and those with other disabilities,
of obstacles, and to direct their movements accordingly through various cues. Guidance devices and their
cues typically fall into three groups:
1. Audible cues – these range from audio-tactile devices at a pedestrian crossing to public address systems.
2. Visual cues – these include maps, signs, lighting, visually contrasting surfaces and guide lines.
3. Physical cues – these include audio-tactile devices at pedestrian crossings, surface texture changes
(tactile ground surface indicators), guide strips, kerbs and other surface-level changes.
Information relating to the design of facilities for persons with a disability is contained in the Guide to Road
Design (Austroads 2008–17), and other Parts of the Guide to Traffic Management, particularly Parts 6 and 11
(Austroads 2019c and 2017b).
Key benefits of a NIA include greater efficiency in the development and use of interoperable ITS
technologies through leveraging current and future investments in ITS. Using the NIA will also help transport
designers and operators understand the operational requirements and information flows that will help inform
the selection and application of those technologies.
Therefore, while today’s solutions become tomorrow’s legacies they should remain interoperable with
tomorrow’s solutions.
Signs and markings constitute the most fundamental way to communicate with road users. Effective and
efficient communication supports the Safe System by contributing to safe roads, safe speeds and safe road
users. To achieve this, it is essential that signing and marking schemes are prepared with users in mind.
Consistency, clarity, simplicity and relevance aid decision making, avoid unnecessary distraction, minimise
response times and reduce stress on drivers.
While the use of standard signs and markings is preferred because they are familiar, innovation is
encouraged. Where a novel or unconventional treatment is being considered, the cognitive workload placed
on users may be increased. In such cases designers should seek an understanding of how users may
respond, including advice from human factors experts as necessary.
In addition to the need for signs and markings to be clear and legible to users, there is also a requirement to
ensure the same for the emerging driver assist technologies that are being developed. The requirements of
these systems are still not well understood and practitioners are advised to follow current standards and
guidance for the time being. However, as driver assist and automated driving technologies advance and
become more commonplace, it is possible that sign and marking standards will need to change in the future
to accommodate vehicles that can read the road. The need for signs and markings to be consistent is likely
to become especially important in the future to minimize the chance of a vehicle interpreting the environment
incorrectly and making an error.
Signing and marking schemes are an important component of many traffic management plans. While signs
and markings are often installed individually for a specific purpose, they are also often part of an overall
signing and marking scheme or traffic management scheme for an area. Designers have to ensure not only
that the correct device is used for a particular purpose, but also that the devices relate logically to each other
and do not provide information that may confuse road users. Where a number of different instructions must
be conveyed to drivers, the spacing of devices is important to ensure that drivers have sufficient time to
comprehend and respond to the messages. In some cases, information has to be prioritised and the scheme
designed accordingly.
• a logical progression through the system exists for all road users (pedestrians, bicyclists, disabled
persons and drivers)
• they conform to the national or state signing strategy or convention (e.g. destination and tourist signs).
The preparation of signing and marking schemes should be included as an activity in project construction
programs with adequate provision made for the time to:
• prepare the scheme
• audit the scheme at an early stage, to reduce the likelihood of errors or deficiencies in the system and
overall project cost
• seek necessary agreements (e.g. from local council) and approvals
• design and manufacture any special sign structures
• manufacture, deliver and install all signs, structures, posts and fittings.
On small, standard, or uncomplicated jobs, a final design may be prepared without the requirement of drafts
being circulated. An independent check of final designs should normally be undertaken.
Signage scheme design drawings should be undertaken in accordance with the requirements of the road
jurisdiction in which they apply.
Where bicycle or bus lanes pass through complex intersections it may be desirable in some instances to use
coloured pavement surfacing for these lanes in order to provide better delineation and definition of priority.
While coloured pavement may be extended through unsignalised intersections with minor roads for this
purpose, it might not be desirable or necessary to do so through major signalised intersections. Use of
coloured pavements is covered in Section 6.6.
Closely spaced arterial road intersections can create some confusion for motorists and difficulty for
designers, particularly with respect to the location and effectiveness of advance direction signs. In these
circumstances it is usually desirable to provide diagrammatic signs; however, this type of sign is usually quite
large and space is usually at a premium in urban situations. Designers should consider the use of overhead
signs as a solution to this problem, even though they are expensive.
Another problem that results from closely spaced intersections is the ‘see through effect’, whereby drivers fail
to stop at the red signal at the first intersection because they are concentrating on the second intersection.
This problem may be addressed by the provision of the prepare to stop warning signs with flashing lights (as
illustrated in AS 1742.2) or by providing larger aspects on the first set of signals. The situation can also be
improved by using louvres and long visors to focus the visibility of the far lanterns to specific drivers in the
field of view.
The traffic control devices used will depend on the traffic management objectives for the area and will usually
require a range of devices including signs, road markings and traffic islands. Controls such as restrictions on
parking and entry, turn bans or lower speed limits may be introduced.
Within an area there may be a need for traffic control devices to relate to various road user groups and
facilities. The preparation of a traffic management plan showing all necessary devices will ensure that a
coherent scheme is developed where various signs relate logically to each other and are not contradictory,
clutter is minimised, and sign location and use of sign supports are optimised.
3.5.1 General
Direction signs are provided to advise road users about the direction and distances to destinations on the
route they are following. They provide information in advance of, at and beyond intersections to reassure
road users that they are travelling along the correct route. Direction signs are therefore an important aspect
of signing and marking schemes as they assist in the safe, orderly and efficient movement of traffic.
The development of schemes for direction signs along new or existing routes, or throughout road networks,
requires the use of a procedure to ensure that information on the signs is accurate, coherent and consistent.
The procedure for determining direction signing requirements at all intersections along a major route, either
metropolitan or rural, may be facilitated by the preparation of:
• a route overview plan
• intersection direction sign layouts
• a plan of reassurance direction signs and stand-alone route number signs.
The signing scheme designer should apply this procedure to achieve consistency in the use of destinations
and route numbers, and to identify the level of treatment required at each intersection according to the
requirements of the local jurisdiction guidelines.
Prior to developing an overview plan for an existing route, it will normally be necessary to determine the
details and condition of all signs that exist along the route. Some signs may be relatively new and able to be
incorporated into the new scheme, while others may be damaged or aged well beyond the warranty period
for the sign face material, or require relocation. Further discussion is given in Commentary 2.
[see Commentary 2]
On less complex routes (e.g. short lengths of lower standard routes where only a few signs are needed) the
required information may be provided on one plan. Alternative presentation methods to those illustrated in
Section 3.5.2 are acceptable provided that the necessary information is documented.
Overview plans provide a pictorial record of basic information required to design and provide effective
direction signs along a route or throughout a road network. They can be prepared as either:
• the first step in upgrading direction signing on an existing route or new road
• a reference plan for the treatment of individual intersections, which require new or replacement signing
prior to a comprehensive upgrading of the whole route.
Destination maps for the jurisdiction should be used to determine the names of destinations to be shown on
direction signs. Typical maps of destinations are shown in Figure 3.2 and Figure 3.3.
The route overview plan is the basis for the information that will appear on intersection direction sign plans. It
is often desirable to prepare a draft concept plan showing intersection direction sign details that can be used
to produce working drawings for production of the signs.
These layouts enable the designer to determine the general types of direction signs required based on the
road classification, and to document the legend, legend size and material class required for each sign. If
required, the approximate size and location of each sign may also be recorded. Typical intersection direction
sign layouts are provided in AS 1742.15. Figure 3.4 shows a draft plan for a typical route comprised of
several intersections.
A draft of the intersection direction sign layout plan (Figure 3.4) should be produced as the basis for the
development of more detailed intersection signing schemes in accordance with AS 1742.15. This information
can then be used to guide the production of working drawings for the manufacture of the signs.
The purpose of this plan (Figure 3.5) is to ensure that reassurance direction signs and stand-alone route
markers are provided in a consistent and adequate manner along routes. The plan also enables the designer
to confirm that all relevant destinations and distances are correct with respect to the relevant datum, and
hence in relation to each other. This simple check is achieved by recording the kilometre distance against
each sign location. A key element of reassurance direction signage is to keep reassuring the driver of the
destination until it is reached.
3.6 Route Planning and Directional and Wayfinding Signage for Bicyclists
The active transport and recreational needs of communities are efficiently served by the development of
regional and local networks of interconnected cycling routes linking major trip origins to destinations. The
planning of these networks is undertaken by government agencies and local governments as part of regional
and municipal bicycle plans.
Directional signs provide wayfinding and informational guidance for bicyclists across these bicycle networks.
When developing wayfinding signage for bicycles, road designers, engineers and transport planners should
aim to provide high quality, professional and consistent directional signs. Ideally these should be consistent
with bicycle wayfinding signage in cycle networks across Australian and New Zealand cities and towns to
enable riders to use the networks to their full potential and make quick and accurate route choices.
Appendix A provides further guidance on bicycle wayfinding including signage design, cycle route types,
developing a directional sign plan, signing complex intersections, sign installation, sign maintenance and
alternative sign design. Further detailed guidance is provided in Appendix B of Austroads (2015d).
Some key principles and guidelines to consider when implementing pedestrian wayfinding signage are
outlined in Table 3.1.
Table 3.1: Key principles and guidelines to consider when implementing pedestrian wayfinding signage
Principles Guidelines
Focus on the users: users need signage that is Design signs to aid users, not promote providers
coherent and reliable Keep it simple
Reduce clutter: have fewer but better positioned Provide users with a hierarchy of destinations
signs in the streets Sign via key access routes
Disclose information progressively: the user should Help visitors explore
be given enough information to achieve the next
stage of their journey, but not so much detail that Only sign within a walking distance
they become confused Continue signing to destination
Create connectivity: by linking one location to the Don’t sign the obvious
next through signing, visitors can move freely and Don’t sign to destinations behind the reader
confidently from one place to another and from one Sign to closer destinations ahead of those further away
transport mode to another Sign to high priority destinations ahead of low priority
Be consistent: signage should carry consistent, destinations
predictable and reliable information Sign to suburbs and precincts where this is more
Use resources efficiently: work with other agencies concise
to deliver and maintain improved signage. Avoid signing to destinations within another signed
destination
Avoid signing diagonally across a road grid
Sign across intersections where needed
Direct visitors via safe/preferred routes.
The auditor must be a person who has experience with the guidelines that apply to signing schemes, and
has had little or no involvement in the route that is to be audited. An independent auditor is more likely to
identify gaps or improvements along a particular route than an auditor who has had involvement with the
signing scheme design or is otherwise familiar with the route.
The procedure for conducting an audit is to firstly become familiar with the route to be audited by studying
the overview and intersection layout plans, and then to travel the route and establish whether:
• the correct signs have been erected as detailed in the overview
• the signs match the sign face designs
• the appropriate type of sign is used in each situation
• sign locations are appropriate
• legends on signs are correct
• sign face materials are appropriate
• signs are obscured, or likely to be, by objects or vegetation
• there are any gaps in the signing scheme.
As part of the audit process, photographs should be taken of signs along the route for further reference.
A suggested checklist to facilitate audits is shown in Figure 3.6.
An audit is used by the responsible manager to determine those aspects of route signing that should be
corrected, taking existing and future budgets into account.
1. Have the correct signs been erected as per the overview? YES/NO
If no, please describe ......................................................................................................................
........................................................................................................................................................
6. Are the sign face materials chosen for the signs appropriate? YES?NO
If no, please describe ......................................................................................................................
........................................................................................................................................................
When YES can be answered for questions 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7 and NO for question 8.
The design and use of parking control signs is covered in detail in AS 1742.11. This standard provides
detailed information on:
• types of parking signs
• the layout of the faces of parking signs, priority and arrangement of panels
• permissible forms of information presented on the sign face
• sizes of legends and symbols
• orientation of parking signs at the edge of the road (i.e. not parallel to the kerb)
• longitudinal placement and spacing between signs
• mounting heights
• the need for reflectorisation or illumination of the sign.
Parking fines are an emotive issue within the community and it is therefore essential for traffic engineering
practitioners to ensure that parking control signs are designed and installed in accordance with the
standards, so that the messages on various panels are clear and not contradictory, and the physical and
temporal limits of restrictions are clear.
In designing area parking control schemes under the road rules, a sufficient number of intermediate signs
should be provided within the area to give visitors reasonable advice on the restrictions that apply.
Strategies for parking schemes along a road, a route or throughout an area should desirably provide for:
• short, medium and long-term parking depending on the nature of abutting land use
• loading zones to suit different types of delivery vehicles
• special zones for buses, taxis and other uses
• disabled persons parking spaces
• adherence to statutory limits (unless the nature of the road permits a lesser distance that does not
compromise sight distances from side streets)
• no stopping areas on the approaches to intersections, commensurate with operational and capacity
requirements
• clearways and tow-away zones to overlay parking restrictions that apply to other periods.
Depending on the nature of the parking area, the following Australian/New Zealand Standards may also be
relevant:
• AS/NZS 2890.1 Parking facilities: off-street car parking
• AS/NZS 2890.2 Parking facilities: off-street commercial vehicle facilities
• AS/NZS 2890.5 Parking facilities: on-street car parking.
A particular issue in local areas is the damage sustained by signs on small traffic islands (e.g. keep left signs
on splitter islands at roundabouts and other intersections). These signs are often not critical and may be
omitted provided that the island outline is clearly visible under all conditions.
Standard signs and the principles to be followed in their use are given in AS 1742.3 (which is currently being
updated with an expected completion date of 2017) and in the New Zealand Code of Practice for Temporary
Traffic Management, CoPTTM (NZ Transport Agency 2012). While the setting out and removal of signs at
roadwork sites should be undertaken in accordance with the standards, supplementary guidance is provided
below.
The philosophy is that road users should be given a general warning in advance of works activity and then
be positively guided through, around or past the worksite in an appropriate and safe manner by means of
specified delineation devices.
Prior planning of the procedure to be used for works on the road should minimise interference to traffic.
Proper provision for the measurement of traffic should always be made and sometimes it will be necessary to
inform the public of a traffic diversion, including dates and times (perhaps using variable message signs as
described in Section 5). Roadworks and openings in the road surface should at all times be effectively
fenced and shielded.
On complex construction works, where traffic routes are often relocated for different stages of the work, a
series of traffic management plans should be prepared to cater for each stage. The services of a suitably
qualified traffic engineer may be necessary in such cases.
At sites affected by roadworks or major events, the information on permanent regulatory, warning, guide, or
community information signs may also be affected. It is imperative that the information provided to drivers on
permanent and temporary signs does not conflict. For example, if a side street leading to a community centre
is being closed and traffic detoured, it is important that direction signs to the centre are amended to conform
to the temporary arrangement. This may involve relocation, removal, covering, or temporary alteration of
permanent signs.
Traffic control signs and devices at roadwork sites should be installed in the following order:
• warning and regulatory signs in the advance warning area
• all intermediate warning and regulatory signs and devices required in advance of the taper or start of the
work area
• all delineating devices required to form the taper including the illuminated flashing arrow sign at the end of
the taper where required
• delineation of the work area or a side track
• all other required warning and regulatory signs including termination and end of temporary speed zone
signs.
Once the signs are erected personnel involved in the installation of traffic control signs and devices at
roadwork sites should:
• inspect the work zone by performing a drive-through inspection and document the observations and
correct any deficiencies
• observe motorists driving through the work zone to look for trends in motorist difficulty in manoeuvring
through the work zone.
A work vehicle with a flashing arrow or flashing lights must be utilised during the installation of the signs and
devices, and positioned between the workers and approaching traffic during the placement of traffic control
devices. The work vehicle must travel in the direction of normal traffic flow. Signs and devices that are
erected before they are required should be covered so the sign message cannot be seen by road users and
the cover removed immediately prior to the commencement of work.
Traffic control signs and devices should be removed in the reverse order as they were erected, starting from
the work area and moving out towards the approaches. The delineating devices such as cones and bollards
should be removed by positioning a work vehicle between the workers and the approaching traffic and slowly
reversing along the closed roadway allowing workers to remove the traffic control devices. Placing an
‘advance warning vehicle’ between the workers and the approaching traffic should be considered when
removing barrier boards from lane closures.
At sites where it is difficult to install and remove traffic control signs and devices due to traffic conditions,
traffic volume, shoulder width or road alignment, alternative traffic management plans must be developed to
complement the general principles of the installation, and removal of these signs and devices should be
given consideration to maintain worker safety.
In some situations, vehicles may be required to move in a forward direction and signs and devices removed
in the same order as they were installed. In this situation, care needs to be taken to ensure the safety of
workers and approaching road users.
Special consideration is required for the installation and removal of detour routes with the following steps
recommended:
• Step 1: install the last sign that vehicles will see (that is the sign at the end of the detour).
• Step 2: install the remaining signs working back towards the beginning of the detour. This procedure
allows vehicles to detour only after all the signs are in place.
Alternatively, the signs can be placed one by one and covered until ready for use, where they are uncovered
in the above sequence. Works supervisors should drive the detour route to ensure it is suitable for the
expected traffic volume and type of vehicles to be detoured. Removal should be undertaken in the following
steps:
• Step 1: remove the sign at the beginning of the detour route.
• Step 2: remove all other signs in the direction of the flow of traffic.
Roadworks and building construction sites often interfere with the free movement of pedestrians, causing
them to be diverted from their usual path, and even onto the carriageway.
Safe practices relating to building and construction sites are generally covered in workplace, health and
safety Acts or Regulations and these must be followed. For roadworks, AS 1742.3 (which is currently being
updated with an expected completion date of 2017) and associated variations adopted by states and
territories should also be referred to.
Obstructions on the footway (including construction materials and plant) must be well guarded by continuous
barriers, with the addition of lamps by night. Where pedestrians are diverted onto the carriageway, the
temporary route should be defined clearly to both drivers and pedestrians by continuous barriers. People
with sight impairments require solid barriers at a low level for detection; accordingly, free-standing handrails
with a rigid bar close to the walkway should be provided. Such solid barriers should be placed at least 1.0 m
from the works where practical. All barriers should be free of projections or appendages which could be
hazards to pedestrians. Flexible barriers such as those provided by chains, ropes or plastic strips are less
favoured as they provide no support should someone fall into them and people with sight impairments find
them difficult to detect. Where a temporary footway is provided, its surface must be of an adequate standard
and free from loose materials.
Where pedestrians are diverted across the carriageway, adequate provision must be made for the resulting
pedestrian flows. Use may be made of a nearby set of traffic signals through appropriate signs or, in some
cases, temporary signals (i.e. non-permanent installations which may be installed in a drum or other
temporary structure and incorporate pedestrian traffic signal elements – e.g. push button – as opposed to
being permanently installed or erected on a portable installation such as a small trailer). It should be
recognised, however, that many people will be reluctant to cross or not realise the need to cross the road to
avoid temporary works; any pedestrian diversion should be well designed and appropriately signed and
marked to improve the confidence of pedestrians to use it.
The types of barriers and protection used at temporary work sites will depend on the length of time that they
are needed. At roadwork sites which disrupt pedestrians for only a few hours, a limited amount of protection
will be needed. At a construction site for a multi-storey building, the protection may be required for several
months and in this case, the temporary pedestrian footpaths provided should be made to basically the same
standard as a permanent footpath.
4. Traffic Signs
Effective traffic signs are an important part of traffic management systems, and are a fundamental
requirement for the safe and efficient use of roads. A key concept of a Safe System, is self-explaining roads
(i.e. roads that are predictable and designed to elicit road user behaviours, including speed, that are
appropriate and safe for the intended function and use of the road). A self-explaining road should only
require a minimum amount of signing: limited to that which is essential for the regulation and guidance of
road users. Ideally, no warning signs would be required.
Traffic signs are used to communicate a variety of information to road users and this is achieved through a
combination of visual effects involving a message displayed on a distinctive signboard shape, background
colour and brightness. The message may be in words, numerals, symbols, diagrams or a combination of
these components. This section deals with static signs that are generally formed by applying a retroreflective
sign face material to a signboard, usually a thin plate of aluminium. Electronic signs including variable
message signs are discussed in Section 5.
Effective and efficient communication with drivers and other road users will enhance road user safety. The
objective is to minimise the cognitive workload (particularly in complex situations), avoid distraction and
minimise processing and response times. To achieve this, signs must be:
• Legible
• Positioned appropriately (both longitudinally and laterally)
• Consistent (with other signs and the road environment)
• Concise
• Relevant
Standard sign shapes and colours, and typical usage of various types of signs, are discussed in AS 1742. A
comprehensive index of current standard signs is contained in AS 1742.1. In New Zealand the basic
references are the Land Transport Rules and MOTSAM. Where possible, New Zealand adopts Australian
policies for the use of signs, however there may be some differences with respect to size, shape and colour.
To assist effective traffic control and road safety, it is essential that signs are used in accordance with
standard practice. The application of individual signs is not given in this Guide and advice should be sought
in AS 1742 and in jurisdictional guidelines.
Used appropriately, road signs can be a very cost-effective means of managing traffic. AS 1742.2 and other
Guides outline general principles that enable signs, markings and devices to achieve the purposes for which
they are designed and installed. However, it is incumbent on traffic engineers and designers to consider
carefully the application of signs, and combinations of signs, in any given situation, rather than simply
following basic guidance. Regardless of whether guidelines and warrants are met, designers should assess
the need for a new (standard) sign and consider whether:
• drivers will be overloaded with excessive information at the site
• drivers are likely to notice, appreciate and act on the message
• existing devices are needed or should be removed or relocated
• the problem or situation can be reasonably addressed by erecting a sign
• alteration to the road layout is necessary.
The principles for designing and testing effective traffic signs (Donald 1995) are:
• Any new traffic signs should be designed and tested according to the relevant Australian Standards (e.g.
AS 1742 Parts 1 and 2, AS 1743, AS 1744 and AS 2342).
• There must be valid reasons provided before any new traffic sign is developed.
• It is important to maintain consistent signing methods to assist drivers in their driving task.
• The issue of mandatory versus prohibitory messages must be considered on a case-by-case basis.
Although no universal prescription can be made, the simpler option is generally best.
• Symbolic signs are preferable where an effective symbol can be developed, due to increased legibility
distance. However, complex messages are more effectively conveyed by text signs.
• The use of abstract symbols should be kept to a minimum and, when used, they should have a text
component as well.
• The use of highly stylised pictorial symbols should be avoided, as drivers often do not comprehend them
in the way the sign designer envisages. As it is difficult to predict in advance what form of symbolic sign
will be well understood by users, it is preferable to develop a number of signs (for testing) which vary in
their image content.
• It is important to test a number of attributes (e.g. legibility distance, comprehension, etc.) when
considering the effectiveness of signs.
• Testing should be carried out with a group of subjects that is broadly representative of the driving
population.
• It is important to consider whether testing should be carried out in situ or in isolation.
• When testing traffic signs, open-ended questions are preferable, with the tester recording word for word
any unusual answers not already shown coded on the interviewer’s answer sheet.
• It is important to avoid introducing a new sign only because it had the best performance in the testing
phase. It may be the case that no sign performs well enough to be implemented.
• The process of how new signs are to be introduced, including the extent and form of user education,
always needs to be considered and managed carefully.
The standards also provide a range of signs relating to particular road user groups including bicyclists,
pedestrians, people with a disability, buses, trams and trucks.
Purpose
The purpose of regulatory signs is to inform motorists of statutory requirements, for example, priority at
intersections, speed limits, prohibition of vehicle movements at intersections, and control of standing or
parking of vehicles. As regulatory signs communicate statutory requirements to the road user, they must be
sited and maintained so as to give the driver, or other applicable road user, every opportunity to obey the law
or instruction.
Regulatory signs derive their legal status from traffic regulations within the relevant jurisdiction and are
generally based on the national road rules (Australian Road Rules 2012 or New Zealand Land Transport
Rules). Schedules within these documents provide illustrations of regulatory signs that relate to the rules.
Some regulations may apply to a considerable length of road and repeater signs may be required at
specified distances as a reminder to drivers using the route or to inform drivers joining the route. This is
particularly necessary in the case of speed restriction signs. However, unnecessary signs should be avoided
if the situation can be adequately catered for by the road rules.
Location
The location of regulatory signs varies with the purpose of the sign. Some can be placed well before the
point where action is required while others are required to be erected at the point where the traffic law or
regulation applies.
Situations where stop, give-way or roundabout signs should be erected on both sides of the approach lanes
facing approaching traffic include:
• wide one-way carriageways
• approaches to multi-lane roundabouts
• situations where a sign located on the left would not be conspicuous to approaching drivers (e.g. because
of excessive lateral displacement or vegetation) in which case a sign may also be located on a splitter
island in the centre of the road.
The use of a stop sign or a give-way sign is dependent on the available sight lines on the relevant approach.
It is important that stop signs are installed only where they meet warrants, as inappropriate use of stop signs
can cause disrespect for the sign and the law requiring drivers to stop (refer to AS 1742.2 for warrants).
The location of other types of regulatory signs varies and guidance is provided in the relevant parts of AS 1742.
For example, speed restriction signs are generally erected on both sides of carriageways on divided arterial
roads. Regulatory signs may be located on the right side of carriageways if that location provides a better result
for drivers (e.g. restricted use of the right lane for some special purpose such as a transit lane). In addition, if a
sign relates to a particular lane it may be preferable to locate the sign above the lane.
Purpose
Warning signs are used to alert drivers to hazardous or potentially hazardous conditions that may not be apparent
or discernible owing to road geometry or environmental conditions. Warning signs advise the driver and other
road users of conditions that require caution and possibly a reduction in speed for their own safety and that of
other drivers, pedestrians and bicyclists. They may also be used as an advance warning of another traffic control
device (e.g. pedestrian crossing, stop sign, and traffic signals) where visibility of the device is severely restricted.
Warning signs are generally diamond shaped and have a black legend, symbol, and border on a yellow
background.
It is important that warning signs be used only where the potential hazard is not obvious to an approaching
driver, as improper use leads to reduced effectiveness of warning signs generally.
Location
A warning sign should generally be erected on the left side of the carriageway and be positioned so that it
will convey its message effectively without restricting lateral clearance or sight distance. If considered
necessary, the sign or a duplicate sign may be erected on the right side of the carriageway. Situations
requiring a duplicate sign may include:
• one-way carriageways, either as part of a one-way system or divided road
• roads where an important sign on the left may be frequently obscured by large vehicles (e.g. two-way
multi-lane roads, overtaking lanes)
• two-way two-lane roads to form a gateway treatment where a high level of visual impact is required.
Warning signs should be placed at a point where legibility is achieved in sufficient time for the driver to
respond to the warning. This time includes that required to read the sign, react to it, and safely decelerate to
an appropriate speed or stop. If a greater legibility distance or improved visual impact is required, a larger
sign with correspondingly larger symbols or legend should be used. Advice on the longitudinal location of
warning signs for various standard treatments is given in AS 1742.2.
In some instances, it may be necessary to install warning signs fitted with advance warning signals
(Section 8.5.1).
Purpose
Guide signs are used to guide motorists by providing information on the direction and/or distance to
destinations on the route to be followed or along other roads that intersect the route. They also give
directions to roadside services such as rest areas, camping facilities, parking areas and tourist facilities.
AS 1742 adopts the following system of naming guide signs:
• advance direction (AS 1742.15)
• intersection direction (AS 1742.15)
• finger boards (AS 1742.15)
• reassurance direction (AS 1742.15)
• motorway guide (AS 1742.15)
• street name (AS 1742.5)
• community facility name (AS 1742.5)
• services (AS 1742.6)
• tourist (AS 1742.6)
• route markers (AS 1742.15)
• kilometre posts (AS 1742.2).
Advance direction signs allow drivers time to select a route prior to entering an intersection. Intersection
direction signs (position signs) are used to confirm the route to be taken out of an intersection, while
reassurance direction signs are located beyond the intersection to reassure drivers that the correct choice
has been made, and to provide distances to destinations along the route. All three types of direction sign are
normally used on important roads, and advance direction and reassurance direction signs are often not
provided on roads of lesser importance.
The design of guide signs needs careful consideration as they must be sufficiently legible and large enough
for drivers to read them from vehicles moving at high speed, often in high-volume, multi-lane situations
where lane changing, merging and weaving may be involved. Their distinctive feature is that they incorporate
directional information such as route numbers, destinations, traffic instructions (e.g. left lane, exit 1 km) and
directional arrows or lane arrows. The information must be placed in a defined sequence to guide the
motorist approaching each intersection or motorway exit. They are often large and are generally located at
standard distances from intersections or motorway exits.
Route numbering supplements direction signing as an additional aid to navigation by assigning numbers to
roads that have significance as through routes. The principles and design of route numbering are fully
described in AS 1742.15. It is most important that route numbers be displayed repeatedly and frequently so
that drivers will be reassured that they are following the desired route. In several jurisdictions route
numbering is changing from a system based on numbers within shields to an alpha-numeric system. For the
purposes of route numbering, the new system classifies a route according to the function it performs. Routes
are designated A, B, or C depending on the functional hierarchy, A being the most important arterial roads.
An M designation may be substituted for the A route classification for urban and rural motorways. B and C
arterial routes are therefore arterial routes of lesser importance. Not all jurisdictions use C routes. A unique
number is provided for each road within each designation.
Location
AS 1742.15 advises that guide signs should not normally be erected in medians unless:
• they have special relevance to traffic travelling in the right lane
• in special cases a sign is required to supplement a similar sign on the left
• they are unable to be mounted on the left (e.g. urban situations with roadside development and a wide median).
It may also be acceptable to erect guide signs in medians where the median width is sufficient enough to not
require protection of the sign or where suitable protection can be provided.
Guide signs may be located in traffic islands provided that they do not impede pedestrian movements or
interfere with a driver’s sight lines.
Other signs and markings include chevron alignment markers and diagonal chevron markings.
Chevron alignment markers should be used to augment the delineation of substandard curves wherever an
engineering assessment indicates that other prescribed or recommended delineation by means of pavement
markings and post delineators is insufficient to delineate the curve adequately. Chevron alignment markers
should not be used unless these other devices are also in place. AS 1742.2 provides details and standards in
relation to the use of chevron alignment markers. They should be reserved exclusively for curve delineation,
and should not be used for the delineation of islands or other obstructions, or for any other purpose.
Wide diagonal or chevron markings may be applied to areas of pavement that are not intended for use by
moving vehicles. They define splayed island approaches to obstructions, sealed shoulders, painted islands
and medians and areas separating exit ramps from the motorway carriageway. They are also used to
indicate escape areas, if required.
Diagonal markings are used when all traffic must pass to one side of the marking. Chevron markings are
used when traffic may pass to either side of the marking. These include markings on splayed approaches,
diagonal markings on shoulders and flush islands and medians.
AS 1742.2 provides details and standards for the use of the above markings.
In New Zealand these markings are used for similar purposes but where wide diagonal lines are marked as
part of right-turn bays and flush medians the areas are permitted to be used by turning drivers only.
4.3.1 General
AS 1743 is intended to be used for the design and manufacture of standard road signs that generally fall into
two broad categories, namely:
• signs for which a complete graphic design is preset or substantially preset (e.g. regulatory and warning
signs)
• signs where varying information within a standardised style requires each sign to be ‘made to measure’
(e.g. direction, services and tourist signs).
In addition, there is an occasional need for a new standard sign, or a sign that is unique to a particular site or
situation, to be designed. In such cases the principles and design guidelines contained in all relevant
standards are to be applied.
Signs must be designed to be conspicuous and easily read by approaching drivers. Conspicuity refers to the
ease with which a sign is first noticed and detected. It depends on the sign’s luminance, contrast ratio, size,
and its location relative to a driver’s line of sight. In addition to a sign being visible and detectable, the sign
message must also be legible; that is, sufficient detail within the sign must be visible at a given distance and
in a given time period. A driver must also be able to comprehend the intended meaning of the message.
Signs can be literal (e.g. keep left) or symbolic. Symbolic signs have become more important as their use
has increased. They increase conspicuity and legibility due to the use of larger sign elements and have the
potential for overcoming problems associated with illiterate drivers, or drivers not familiar with the local
language. More detail in a symbol may allow the sign to be better understood, but greater detail also reduces
the legibility distance.
The legend used on road signs in Australia and New Zealand must be in the English language. Information
on signs is not to be duplicated in another language, as it is not practicable to accede to all such requests
from the community. The replication of information in multiple languages would lead to confusing and
ineffective signs that have excessive information. Notwithstanding this restriction, jurisdictions may display
Australian aboriginal names, or Maori names in New Zealand, instead of the English name for destinations,
places or other geographic features. Proposed names may need to be subjected to a specific approval
process within jurisdictions.
AS 1742.1 and AS 1743 provide a numbering system for road signs that enables ease of identification for
practitioners and also facilitates the correct ordering and supply of signs, particularly those with preset
graphics. Practitioners in New Zealand should refer to MOTSAM.
The use of various colours must comply with those specified in AS 1742.1 and AS 1743. Except for the
distinctive shape of some critical regulatory signs (e.g. octagonal stop signs) and warning signs (diamond
shape), colour is the most important characteristic that enables early driver recognition of signs. It is most
important that the colour of road signs complies with Australian Standards. The standard colours for
non-reflective road signs are given in AS 2700. The colours of retroreflective sign face material must conform
to the requirements specified in AS/NZS 1906.1.
Some road agencies have installed signs that extend the use of colour beyond that prescribed in
AS/NZS 1906.1. This often involves the use of red, green or yellow as a backing board to improve the
conspicuity of the sign against its locational background, usually at hazardous or potentially hazardous sites.
An example is shown in Figure 4.1. Some road agencies such as NZTA do not permit red backgrounds or
backing boards as they are reserved for specific signs such as the Wrong Way signs at motorway off-ramps
or for the railway level crossing signs at high-risk railway level crossings. Practitioners should refer to their
own jurisdiction’s signage guidelines before considering the use of colour for backing boards.
Fluorescent colours
Australasian road agencies use fluorescent sheeting material to improve the conspicuity of particular signs
that are considered critical for road safety for vulnerable groups (e.g. fluorescent yellow-green is used for
warning signs relating to pedestrians and pedestrian crossings).
In some cases contrasting fluorescent material may be used as a target board or border to further improve
the conspicuity of warning or important guide signs, or as a legend on particular types of sign; however, such
use requires the specific approval of the relevant road agency.
The use of fluorescent colours has now been uniformly adopted and is specified in AS 1742.1 for the
following uses:
• Fluorescent orange – used as a background colour for roadwork signs that relate to people working on
the road, for children crossing flags and the hand stop banner for use at a children’s crossing.
• Fluorescent yellow – used as a background colour in lieu of yellow for roadwork signs, route numbers on
direction signs and other specified hazard signs.
• Fluorescent yellow-green – used in lieu of yellow as a background colour for regulatory and warning signs
for the protection of pedestrians.
These signs include the standard signs listed in AS 1742.1 that are also shown in other parts of AS 1742.
Standard drawings for these signs are provided in AS 1743. The designs in AS 1743 can be used to
manually produce a drawing of the required size sign, or electronic files of the signs can be obtained from
Standards Australia. This may be necessary where specific inscriptions are allowed under the Australian
Road Rules or site-specific information (e.g. limits and times on parking signs) needs to be added. However,
many of these signs are manufactured using computer aided design tools.
General
These signs are generally those direction signs that have site-specific information on them, usually route
numbers, destinations and road names. Each sign is separately drafted in accordance with the principles
provided in AS 1743, usually using a computer program. The signs include large guide signs used for major
arterial intersections and motorways. The design of the signs can be challenging in order to develop a sign
face design that meets basic design rules (e.g. information not excessive), provides coherent guidance and
results in an efficient use of space.
Examples of each numbered sign type are shown in the AS 1743 drawings. The model layout shown for the
selected sign function, together with any specific layout requirements or restrictions shown on the drawing
should be followed as closely as possible. However, complex road layouts and geometry will necessitate that
designers carefully consider the information provided on signs to ensure consistency with the road and
linemarkings, and other signs provided in advance of or beyond the sign being designed. Complex situations
may require a series of signs to convey the necessary information to drivers.
Design principles
The rules and model drawings in AS 1743 should be used as a basis for the design of sign faces for
made-to-measure (or special) signs. Individual drawings are necessary for the production of these signs and
the drawings must show all critical information and dimensions necessary for manufacture.
An example of a sign face design for a direction sign is shown in Figure 4.2. It should be noted that design
and drawing details may vary between states and territories.
Designers should be aware that even when all the design rules are obeyed, a sign may not look well
balanced and adjustments may have to be made to sign elements such as spacings and arrow types to
achieve a satisfactory appearance. The following points should be noted when arranging information on a
sign face:
• Cramping of the legend is to be avoided.
• Large areas of blank sign face should be avoided, particularly blank areas that are not symmetrical
across the sign face, unless a directional enhancement is being sought.
• If there are two lists side by side (e.g. on a reassurance sign), the left list should be left justified and the
right list should be right justified.
• Destinations on reassurance signs should be listed in the order that they would be reached by a driver
along the route.
• Elements such as arrows and symbols may sometimes have to be larger than the accompanying principal
legend would normally require (e.g. where the element relates to several lines of legend).
The amount of legend on guide signs must be limited so that they can be read during the brief time drivers
can divert their attention from the driving task. The principal legend on motorway guide signs should be
limited to three lines on roadside signs and two lines on overhead signs. The principal legend does not
include symbols, exit instructions, and cardinal directions, which can make up other lines within reasonable
limits. Examples are provided in AS 1742.15.
Figure 4.2: An example of a drawing for a made-to-measure intersection direction sign (G2-1)
The information on direction signs may be displayed as words and/or symbols as in ‘stack’ type direction
signs, or in diagrammatic form. The latter is commonly used at roundabouts, closely spaced intersections or
motorway exits, or other sites where the provision of a diagrammatic representation of the intersection layout
may be an advantage. Diagrammatic type signs generally have shorter reading time and are more easily
interpreted than stack type signs, but usually require larger signboards.
Practitioners should refer to AS 1744 for the standard alphabet to be used on road signs. The purpose of the
standard alphabet as defined by AS 1744 is to establish uniformity in the forms and dimensions of letters,
numerals and symbol characters. AS 1744 specifies the forms and sizes of letters, numerals and text
symbols along with the spacing between them. These alphabets are intended specifically but not exclusively
for use with the standard road signs in AS 1743.
The various parts of AS 1742 list the sizes of standard signs (e.g. regulatory or warning signs) that are
available. The size of the sign is determined by the size of the legend and symbols that, in turn, may be
determined by the:
• legibility requirements for a particular traffic speed environment
• width of road and lateral offset to the sign
• ability to accommodate a sign at constrained or difficult urban sites.
The variety of legends used on direction signs generally precludes the adoption of standard sign sizes. The
size adopted will depend on the letter height selected, the number of words in the legend, symbols used, and
the general arrangement. AS 1742.15 provides a tabular guide to the minimum legend sizes required for
various types of direction signs on non-motorway roads and for motorway signs. However, it is
recommended that relevant road agency guidelines be consulted as they may specify letter heights for
particular situations or types of road that vary from Australian Standards noting that the level of
retroreflectivity, letter series and letter height all have a significant effect on legibility.
At locations where the background and surroundings to the sign have a large amount of material that would
make the sign difficult to see (e.g. urban areas with illuminated advertising signs, shop fronts or other lights)
a larger legend and sign may be used at the discretion of the designer. In addition, larger signs are required
where they are located overhead or on high-speed roads.
It is sometimes necessary to establish the legibility distance of a legend from first principles. Instances that
require this may include:
• the design of a completely new sign
• demonstration that a particular sign is located a sufficient distance from a hazard.
The procedure for determining the legibility distance required of a traffic sign can be represented
diagrammatically as shown in Figure 4.3. This arrangement assumes that the driver does not start to read
the information on the sign until sometime after the letters first become legible. This is generally considered
to be at a distance equivalent of two-thirds of the legibility distance from the sign.
The distance travelled while reading the legend or while locating a place name on a sign is dependent on the
form of the legend (e.g. words in vertical stack or diagrammatic arrangement) and the number of words to be
read. Research at Melbourne University (Jacobs & Cole 1978) indicates that:
• the time taken by average observers to correctly read a sign involving two to eight words is given by:
• the time taken to locate a place name (seven letters) on a sign comprised of a vertical stack of up to eight
words (as in a reassurance direction sign) is given by:
t = 0.25 N seconds 2
where
N = the number of words on the sign
The research indicates little practical difference in the above two values of t for signs containing up to five
words (a generally accepted practical limit for most signs). Thus, for most general purposes the time taken to
read a sign (of up to five words) may be taken as given in Equation 2
The distance travelled while reading the sign is therefore given by:
tv = 0.25 Nv 3
where
v = the speed in metres per second
It is generally accepted that the normal range of lateral vision should be limited to 10° horizontally and 5°
vertically. This minimises the driver’s head and eye movement from the travel path ahead. Thus, as a driver
approaches a sign, the reading of the legend should be completed before the centre of the sign subtends
these angles at the driver’s eye. These angles give values of cot θ (in Figure 4.3) of 5.7 and 11.4 for angles
of 10° and 5° respectively.
Using the above relationships and values, Figure 4.3 shows that the total legibility distance of a sign is given
by:
2
L = 0.25 Nv + S cot θ and therefore
3
where
L = legibility distance required (metres)
N = number of words on the sign (for two to five words)
v = travel speed of vehicles approaching the sign in m/s
travel speed of vehicles approaching the sign in km/h. V is usually taken as 60 km/h for
V =
urban areas, 70 km/h for semi-urban areas and 80–100 km/h for rural areas
lateral or vertical displacement of the centre of the sign from the centre of the traffic lane,
S =
or above the driver eye height, for side or overhead-mounted signs respectively
The legibility distances for letters of the standard sign alphabets detailed in AS 1744 have been determined for
the average observer with normal (or corrected) vision as shown in Table 4.1. Thus, the required letter height H
(in mm) for words on a side (laterally) mounted advance direction sign (modified E series) is given by:
0.105 NV + 8.55S
H = and therefore
0.75
H = 0.14 NV + 11.4 S 6
where
N = number of words on the sign
V = travel speed in km/h
lateral offset of the sign (measured from the centre of the sign to the centre of the traffic
S =
lane)
This is the initial capital letter height and the lower-case letters are always 75% of the height of the initial
capital letter. Equation 6 relates to the modified E series alphabet due to the 0.75 divisor.
It should be noted that the modified E series alphabet, which is specifically used for lower-case lettering on
direction signs, has a stroke width of one-fifth of the letter height and the legibility of the lower-case words is
the same as that of the initial capital letter (for further details refer to AS 1744).
The required letter height for other letter series and sign situations may be determined from Equation 6 by
applying the following adjustment factors to the formula:
• For other letter series, increase H by 7% for Series E, 25% for Series D, and 50% for Series C.
• To compensate for adverse visual effects of urban areas, where advertising signs, building lights etc.
reduce the conspicuity of traffic signs and drivers are often involved in complex traffic situations, increase
H by 50%.
• For signs mounted overhead (i.e. where the driver’s comfortable field of observation is limited to 5°
vertically), the factor S in the formula must be multiplied by 2.
• Where an overhead sign is mounted at the roadside, more than 3 m from the edge of the pavement, it
may be necessary to calculate the equivalent lateral distance SEL from the formula:
[
S EL = (S L ) + 4(SV )
2
]
2 0.5 7
where
SL = lateral offset of the sign from driver’s path
Sv = vertical height of the centre of the sign above the driver’s eye
The distance SEL is then used in place of S in Equation 6 for H for laterally placed signs.
Further to the above guidance, Appendix B outlines guidance used by Main Roads Western Australia
(MRWA) to determine the sight distance to direction sign. Practitioners may consider this guidance for
application within their jurisdictions.
Arrows
Arrows are used on many direction signs to indicate directions to a destination or to indicate lanes which
should be used for particular traffic movements. Direction arrows and associated legend on stack type
advance direction signs are arranged in the following order, from top to bottom of a sign:
• vertically upwards for directions ahead
• angled 45° upward left or right
• horizontal left or right.
Within this order, destinations are arranged in order of increasing distances down the sign, and with direction
arrows arranged so that on successive lines on the sign they are placed on alternate sides of the sign.
Arrows angled upward at 45° are used on motorway exit signs to emphasise the diverging layout of
motorway exit ramps. Where arrows are used to designate lane usage they should point vertically (or near
vertically) downward over the required lane. However, where electronic signs are used for lane closure
purposes during incident management, the arrows should be inclined at 45° away from the lane that is
closed in order to indicate the need for drivers to change lanes (Section 5.6.2).
The identification and direction of arterial roads that have significance as through routes can be achieved by
displaying the route number and direction of the route. Route numbers or markers in the case of tourist
drives (AS 1742.6) should be located in a standard position on sign faces in relation to direction arrows and
destination names.
The design and layout of arrows, chevrons and borders on traffic signs are important and AS 1743 provides
details.
Symbols
The use of symbols on signs to convey all or part of a message may reduce reading time and extend
legibility distance, provided that the symbol is properly designed, is simple in form, and its message is readily
interpreted. Common standard symbols, such as the arrow and junction diagram, have legibility distances
two to three times that of a word legend occupying comparable signboard space.
The introduction of new symbols is governed by the requirements of AS 2342 5, which specifies procedures
for determining the need for a symbol, its design, and testing for recognition and interpretation. In general, no
new symbols will be introduced for road signs, either for standard or non-standard signs, unless they have
been subjected to and meet the relevant requirements of AS 2342 procedures. Notwithstanding this, some
road agencies may adopt unique logos to define tourist experiences of importance (e.g. Explorers Way in
South Australia and Northern Territory). These tourist initiatives are developed in partnership between road
and tourism agencies and are supported by a substantial tourism program that assists in recognition of the
symbol.
5 AS 2342 is proposed to be withdrawn. Once withdrawn it is proposed that AS 1743 will cover the subject matter.
Retroreflectivity is of no benefit in the daytime or when signs are floodlit. However, in some jurisdictions all
signs are required to be retroreflective. Non-retroreflective fluorescent colours have been used for
backgrounds to make important signs more conspicuous in situations where sign messages are only
required during daylight hours (e.g. certain signs at roadworks and children’s crossings).
It is also most important that road signs have the structural integrity to perform satisfactorily throughout their
design life and must therefore be constructed in accordance with road agency specifications. Road signs
generally have an aluminium substrate or zinc/aluminium coated steel substrate, to which retroreflective
sheeting is usually applied. These signs generally fall into one of the following categories:
• Flat sheet, permanent or temporary signs – unbraced
– this category comprises small signs (such as standard regulatory or warning signs) but excludes any
sign that has a width to height ratio in excess of 2.5 to 1 as these must be braced.
• Flat sheet, permanent or temporary signs – braced
– this category comprises all flat sheet signs larger than unbraced signs.
• Folded box edge temporary signs
• Extruded aluminium section signs
– this category comprises fingerboards, road/street name signs and the like made from extruded
aluminium sections.
Extrude signs where sections are dovetailed together to form a sign that presents all of the necessary
information are suited to situations where, over a period of time, some of the information is expected to
change (e.g. tourist signs where new attractions are opened in an area or an attraction ceases to operate). In
such cases a section can be simply added or removed from the sign.
Unbraced signs are bolted directly to post brackets. Braced signs have transverse stiffeners (i.e. at right
angles to posts) that accommodate the post bracket fittings. The number of stiffening braces required
depends on the height of the sign and the wind forces that are experienced in the area.
The size and shape proportions of signs in the Australian Standards that have preset graphics have been
selected, as far as practicable, so as to achieve an economical cut from sign face sheeting and substrate
material 1200 mm wide. It is strongly recommended that the same principle be applied to made-to-measure
signs so that joints in both the substrate and sheeting are minimised.
Each road agency has a specification that covers detailed requirements for the manufacture of road signs,
such as structural requirements and good practice for the joining of sign substrates and sign face sheeting.
Supervisors of works or contracts should ensure that signs erected on roads meet the requirements of the
road agency.
General
All signs that are intended to convey their message during the night need to be reflectorised (or if possible
illuminated – refer below) so that they display their colours and shape and are as legible by night as they
would be by day.
The ability of road signs to perform at night (without floodlighting) is dependent on the retroreflective
properties of the sign face material. Retroreflection occurs when light directed from vehicle headlights onto a
sign face material is directed back to the light source, enabling the reflective object to be seen by an
observer located near to the light source. This enables drivers to see both the colour of the materials and
read the legend, provided that adequate contrast is provided between the legend and the background. For
adequate legibility, the luminance contrast ratio (luminance of legend divided by luminance of sign
background) must comply with AS/NZS 1906.1. The value varies depending on the background colour and
site conditions.
Reflectorisation of road signs is achieved by using retroreflective material for all parts of a sign (legend,
border and background) except those parts that are black.
The effectiveness of reflective signs may be reduced by glare. This may be a surface reflection from a
high-intensity streetlight or from the sun, or it may be glare from the excessive brightness of a high-class
retroreflective material lit only by the vehicle headlights. Highly retroreflective backgrounds can make a
legend on any sign unreadable, and on large signs the background should always be of a lesser brightness
than the legend. High-class retroreflective materials with a glossy surface can suffer from surface reflections
if care is not taken in their siting and orientation with respect to street lights and vehicle headlights.
In practice effective road signs are assured through proper location, adequate design such as sufficient size
of sign and legend, and the use of proven sign face materials. The need for site-specific calculations is very
rare but commercial computer software packages are available when the need arises.
All road signs should be reflectorised using materials conforming to AS/NZS 1906.1 and guidelines issued by
the road agency. The latter sources are important as product approval and use by road agencies may
precede their inclusion in Australian Standards due to a natural lag in the process of developing standards.
Road agencies generally publish a list of approved sign face materials.
AS/NZS 1906.1 specifies the performance requirements for retroreflective sheeting used in the manufacture
of road signs and related traffic control devices. Practitioners should refer to AS/NZS 1906.1 along with road
agency specifications for the class of retroreflective sheeting that should be used for road signs within their
jurisdiction.
Non-reflective material
Non-reflective material is not used extensively. It is used for signs that apply only during daylight hours
(excluding dawn and twilight times) or signs that are illuminated between dusk and dawn.
Black is the only non-reflective colour in general use. For example, it is used for legends on yellow or white
background materials for warning signs and regulatory signs respectively. Before use, non-reflective
materials (including fluorescent materials), paints, films or other surface coatings should be suitably
evaluated for function, durability and compatibility with other materials used in the sign manufacture.
It should be noted that the luminous intensity reduces with aging of sign face material and the manufacturers’
guarantees are related to a specified percentage of the luminous intensity of new material being maintained
at the end of the guarantee period. The performance degradation of road signs is discussed further in
Section 4.6.3 in relation to maintenance.
It should be noted, however, that some material suppliers will not support their warranties if non-suitable
paints or films are applied by sign manufacturers. Road agencies rarely have the capability of evaluating
material of this type prior to installation and therefore require the manufacturers to provide the necessary
quality assurance and warranty.
4.4.2 Illumination
Historically, illumination of overhead signs on urban motorways has been generally considered necessary.
However, with recent developments in signage material this has enabled more overhead signs to be effective
without external illumination, and this has resulted in significant savings through the reduction in capital and
maintenance costs associated with sign lighting. Illumination is now only required where:
• ambient light or background clutter detracts from sign prominence or legibility
• there are other illuminated signs (traffic or other signs) in proximity or within the field of view
• where there is a strong background light level behind the sign (e.g. emerging from a tunnel and a sign is
located at the portal facing into the tunnel).
Overhead signs on motorways and other roads are not normally illuminated unless there is a background of
street lighting, advertising billboards or other extraneous lighting of such a high level that it detracts from the
prominence or legibility of the sign.
Where there is any doubt as to whether illumination will be required at a later time, provision should be made
in the sign structure, including 600 mm additional vertical clearance, for future installation of lamps.
Signs are always illuminated from below the lower edge using either strip or point-source lamps. Where
external illumination is provided, it is important that it be as uniform as practicable over the sign face to avoid
bright spots that may obscure part of the legend.
Ordinary street or highway lighting does not meet the requirements for sign illumination.
Internally illuminated road signs are not common in Australia and New Zealand. However, they may be used
for exit direction signs in tunnels, and in such cases it is important to ensure adequate size and internal
contrast. The limited headroom available in tunnels constrains the size of these signs and it is therefore
important to consider signage in the early stages of a project when the locations of other utilities are not
fixed. Internal illumination of signs may be achieved by a light within or behind the sign face illuminating the
main message or symbol, or the sign background, or both, through a translucent material.
4.5.1 General
An important requirement of a road sign is its visual impact or conspicuity. A satisfactory outcome is normally
achieved through proper location and size of signs. The location and placement of signs involves
consideration of:
• longitudinal placement
• lateral placement including clearances
• vertical clearances
• road layout, environment and topography
• orientation of the sign face relative to drivers.
A sign location will generally be satisfactory if the sign is placed within the driver’s comfortable field of vision
(10° either side of centre in the horizontal plane and 5° upward in the vertical plane) and has adequate
legibility distance.
AS 1742.2 provides general advice on the location and placement of signs, and other parts of the standard
provide information relating to specific types of sign (e.g. AS 1742.11 for parking control signs).
It is also important to establish whether a sign will perform satisfactorily if it is mounted on posts beside the
road, or whether it should be mounted above the road on a cantilever, gantry or other structure.
Guide signs and other important signs (e.g. left lane ends 300 m) on rural arterial roads and rural motorways
are usually side-mounted. Important rural interchanges that have heavy entering and exiting traffic
movements, or more complex movements (e.g. semi-direct ramps or loop ramps) often are provided with
overhead signs. Overhead signs are also often provided on arterial roads at the access points to motorways.
Side-mounted guide signs are satisfactory for most situations on urban arterial roads. However, overhead
signs are often necessary on urban arterial roads that have a very high volume of large trucks that impede
sight distance to the side-mounted signs for other drivers. They are also provided where it is impracticable to
achieve satisfactory performance from a side-mounted sign (e.g. footway or median too narrow, verandas
present, or obscuration by a structure or vegetation).
Because of the high volumes of general traffic and trucks on urban motorways, guide signs and other
important signs are generally mounted overhead.
A road sign must be located at a position along the road where it can be related to the road feature to which
it refers, and if necessary, far enough in advance of that feature to ensure that all drivers will see the sign,
read it, and make a decision before reaching a point where they must act.
The distance required for a driver to see and read a sign is described in Section 4.3.7. The distance beyond
the sign required for drivers to make a decision and act is related to travel speed and the nature of the action
to be taken. For example, in the case of a stop sign a driver should quickly comprehend the sign and then
have the required intersection approach sight distance to bring the vehicle to a stop (Guide to Traffic
Management Part 6 (Austroads 2019c) and Guide to Road Design Part 4 (Austroads 2017c). On the other
hand, a driver on an urban motorway may require relatively large distances in which to read and comprehend
a direction sign, and subsequently undertake any necessary lane change or weaving manoeuvres.
In complex situations it is often necessary to place a number of signs along the road so that decisions and
actions are taken progressively leading up to the final action. Motorway exit signs are an example of this
approach, for which the standard arrangement is summarised in Table 4.2.
In some situations, such as closely spaced intersections or interchanges, it may not be possible to
accommodate the requisite ‘normal’ direction signs in the distance available and a large diagrammatic sign of
the intersecting roads or motorway exits may be necessary. A common example of progressive signs on
arterial roads is where a left lane ends and drivers are warned of the distance to the end of the lane, and
finally instructed to merge right.
Note: At low-volume exit ramps in the urban area (AADT< 3000) on motorways that carry a low volume of trucks,
consideration may be given to side-mounted signs. This case will normally occur only on 4 lane outer urban motorways.
On urban roads the longitudinal placement of signs may be dictated by the presence of physical features
such as minor intersections, driveways or shop verandas. In addition, road alignment (horizontal or vertical)
may require a sign to be placed further in advance of a feature than would be the case if adequate sight lines
were available.
In general, and for situations that do not have complications, the following may be used as a guide:
• For signs which give advance warning of a hazard or of a single specific action required of a driver (i.e.
not involving a complex decision), the distances given for warning signs in Table 4.3 are appropriate.
Within the ranges given in the table, the longitudinal location is varied according to approach speed, and
to the manoeuvre likely to be required (e.g. a possible stop condition will require longer advance warning
than a condition requiring minimal speed change). The range also permits some flexibility in selecting a
prominent site for the sign. Further details and examples are given in AS 1742.2.
• For signs which require a simple decision to be made (e.g. a navigational decision arising from an
advance direction sign), the distances in Table 4.3 may be sufficient in restricted choice situations, say
where only one other route choice is available. For each additional choice or element of complexity in the
decision, as a guide, the distance should be increased by the equivalent of about one second of travel
time.
• For signs requiring complex decisions, such as services or tourist facility signs, a distance equivalent to
about 12 seconds of travel time is normally used.
These distances may be reduced appropriately where a larger than normal sign, with increased legibility
distance, is used.
The maximum distance at which any advance sign is located before a hazard or decision point should not
generally exceed the equivalent of about 15 seconds of travel time, unless it is accompanied by a second
advance sign. The secondary advance sign should have the same message and be located not more than
about 15 seconds in advance of the hazard or decision point. In such cases a distance plate is added to the
first sign, or a distance is included on the sign (e.g. motorway advance direction signs).
A (m)
Road environment Must or may need Significant speed No, low or moderate speed B (m)
to stop reduction required reduction required
Notes:
V85 = 85th percentile approach speed measured 1.5 to 2 times A in advance of hazard.
A = distance from sign to hazard (or nearest sign to hazard where there are two or more signs).
B = minimum distance between successive signs where there are two or more.
Source: AS 1742.2.
In terms of the effective presentation of information to drivers, there should not be more than one sign of a
particular type on each post, except where one sign supplements another (e.g. advisory speed plates with
curve warning signs) or where route or directional signs must be grouped. However, designers should be
mindful of the hazard that additional poles present for motorcyclists and should seek opportunities to
minimise the number of poles. Where it becomes necessary to convey two or more different messages at the
one location on separate signs and supports, they should be located a minimum of 0.6 V85 metres apart
(where V85 is the 85th percentile speed in km/h).
Examples showing the longitudinal location of signing arrangements are provided in figures throughout
various parts of AS 1742.
AS 1742.2 provides general guidance on minimum and maximum clearances between the edge of a traffic
lane and the edge of the sign nearest the road, and on the vertical clearances required to overhead signs.
Designers should also consult road agency guidelines as practices may vary among jurisdictions.
Signs are normally erected on the left side of the road but, if considered necessary, a supplementary sign
may be placed on the right side to ensure that drivers who have their view of a critical sign obscured (on the
left side) obscured are given every chance to read the message.
Lateral placement
Guidelines for clearances to signs are illustrated in AS 1742.2 and may vary between jurisdictions. However,
the following approach can be taken as a general guide to acceptable lateral offset and vertical clearance.
On unkerbed roads the nearest edge of a sign should be at least 600 mm clear of the road shoulder but
should not be less than 2 m nor more than 5 m from the edge of the travelled way. On kerbed roads the edge
of the sign should not be less than 300 mm or generally more than 1 m from the kerb face. Where signs are
more than 5 m from the edge of the travelled way, an oversize sign may be needed to compensate for the
loss of legibility and visual impact.
In rural areas and urban areas not frequented by pedestrians, the bottom edge of the sign should normally
be not less than 1.5 m above the road pavement. In urban areas, to prevent obstruction to pedestrians and
interference from parked vehicles, the clearance to the bottom edge of the sign should be not less than
2.0 m over verges or not less than 2.5 m over pathways. For signs erected above the roadway the clearance
to the bottom edge should generally be not less than 5.3 m, but in certain locations, such as above parking
lanes, consideration may be given to reducing this to 4.7 m.
Height
Where warranted (refer to AS 1742.2), signs may be located overhead on cantilevers or gantries that have
sufficient vertical and lateral clearances from the running lanes so that they will not create a hazard to road
users. Support structures should be located beyond the clear zone or be shielded by a suitable safety
barrier. It is also most important that sign supports are not placed so as to obstruct footways, bicycle paths,
shared paths or property accesses.
Gantries and cantilever supports are most commonly used on motorways but also on the normal arterial road
system. When used on arterial roads the sign supports are located in accordance with the requirements in
AS 1742.2.
Gantries should be located so that signs are not obscured by bridges over roads, including motorways. The
location and spacing of gantries may also be affected by local restrictions in verge or median widths. Where
the location is suitable, and it is practicable, signs should preferably be mounted on the over-bridge.
The nature of the road layout, surrounding environment and topography can affect both the longitudinal and
lateral placement of signs.
The presence of vegetation in either urban or rural environments that is worthy of retention may require that
a sign is placed in advance of the vegetation or closer to the road than preferred. On roads that have
avenues of closely spaced mature trees with substantial canopies, it is often difficult to find suitable locations
for advance intersection direction signs and intersection direction signs. In some cases cantilevered supports
are required to obtain satisfactory sight lines to signs.
In urban areas, particularly commercial environments, the location and/or effectiveness of signs can also be
adversely affected by:
• the road design, intersection layout or presence of other infrastructure that might impede visibility of the
sign (e.g. bridge over road)
• the presence of a confusing or distracting background that may include advertising signs, shop fronts,
building facades or other features or activities
• verandas that prevent provision of advance direction signs
• the location of street lighting and public utility poles
• bus or tram stops and associated infrastructure
• side streets and driveways
• public utility services (water, gas, electricity) that prevent the provision of foundations for larger sign
supports.
In rural, and some urban situations, topography can result in a road passing over a fill embankment or
watercourse, or through a cutting that precludes the use of side-mounted signs. A similar situation arises in
the case of elevated structures, tunnels or roads flanked by large retaining (or noise) walls in urban areas.
Similarly, an intersection layout (particularly complex layouts) may not be conducive to the provision of
effective signs due to constraints on location (e.g. verandas over footpaths, traffic islands too small,
intersections closely spaced).
The background to a sign affects its visual impact and this may differ by day and by night. The effects of
sunset and sunrise on the sign, or on the driver’s view of the sign, may also be factors to consider. In urban
areas the effects of street lighting, advertising signs, and shop awnings may also influence the visual impact
of a traffic sign.
As a general principle, for the safety and convenience of road users, all signs should be orientated to face
the road users for whom the message is intended. Specific examples to be noted are:
• Parking signs should be placed at an angle of 30° (plus or minus 10°) to the edge of the road (refer to
AS 1742.11) to face approaching drivers and should not be placed parallel to the road.
• At median openings within intersections, keep left signs should be angled to face right turners from the
side roads (rather than to directly face through traffic on the major road) to reduce the chance of drivers
turning into the wrong carriageway.
Signs that relate to traffic approaching along a road should be erected at right angles to the direction of travel
but rotated away from the driver’s line of sight to reduce headlight reflection at night from the sign surface.
Normally a rotation of about 5° is used. This requirement is illustrated in AS 1742.2 for both a straight
alignment and a horizontal curve to the left. In the latter case the sign is orientated relative to a 200 m chord
across the curve.
Collocation of a lane use management system (LUMS) (LUMS comprises an electronic speed limit (ESL)
and lane control signal (LCS) display – refer to Section 8.5.11), variable message signs (VMS) and/or
direction signs (DS) has been widely practised overseas and in Australia and New Zealand. While triple
collocation of LUMS, VMS and DS has been practised overseas, it is still relatively new to the Australian
driving community. While there is no clear evidence showing that triple collocation gives rise to riskier
behaviour, this proposition should be viewed with caution. Section 5.5.4 provides guidance on the collocation
of LUMS, VMS and/or DS.
Signs should be placed within the normal field of vision of those for whom they apply. For a standing person,
signs should be placed less than 10° above or below eye level; for a seated person, signs within 15° of eye
level are acceptable. Signs mounted between 900 mm and 1.5 m from ground level provide the most
appropriate compromise between the requirements of seated and standing people. However, it needs to be
recognised that signs mounted at this height are more prone to vandalism and where this is prevalent a
higher mounting height may be desirable.
Signs are most easily read if they directly face the direction of travel; however, signs should be placed so
that they do not constitute hazards to pedestrian movement. Signs placed within 30° horizontally of the
direction of travel can usually be read without requiring head movement. The sign should also be clear of
pedestrians so that its placement does not adversely impact on the safe movement of pedestrians.
4.6 Maintenance
Proper maintenance is essential if signs are to remain effective and command the attention and respect of
motorists and other road users for the full warranted life of the sign.
The materials used for traffic signs have retroreflective properties that enable them to perform adequately
during the night as well as the day. However, all materials will degrade with time and there will come a point
at which the external (between the sign and its background environment) and internal (between the legend
and sign background material) contrasts of the sign will no longer be sufficient to enable the information to be
read. The sign will then be ineffective. Invariably this will happen to the night-time performance first.
4.6.2 Inspection
All signs and devices require regular inspection (day and night) to ensure that:
• they have not become obscured or partly obscured by tree growth or tall grass, or by man-made
obstructions such as poles, traffic signals, etc. installed since the sign was erected
• each sign or device is in good physical condition and does not require replacement due to age or
damage, or repair of bullet holes or other damage
• each sign is performing the function and conveying the message that was originally required both by day
and at night under vehicle headlights or other lighting
• the function of the sign or the message to the road user is still relevant, and there is not a need for an
updated sign or device
• signs and devices are being cleaned by maintenance crews sufficiently often
• supporting structures are in sound condition and fittings are secure
• signs are oriented correctly to face the appropriate traffic stream
• outdated signs are removed or replaced.
For maximum performance, signs should be kept clean and free from dirt, road tar, oil, bituminous material
and mulch. Primarily this means cleaning the surface of the reflective sheeting as this is the essential
element affecting performance of a sign. In some jurisdictions graffiti-resistant treatments are used for signs
in areas where vandalism is a problem. Special care should be taken when cleaning signs to ensure that the
integrity of the sign (including its retroreflective properties) is not damaged.
As a general rule, and depending on the extent of damage, signs with reflective backgrounds which are older
than about six years should be replaced rather than repaired, since the difference in reflectivity between the
old sign material and a new patch will produce an unsightly appearance. Signs less than six years old should
only be repaired where it can be done without affecting the sign’s integrity or warranty.
5. Electronic Signs
Electronic signs are being increasingly used to manage traffic, improve road efficiency and enhance safety.
They are used primarily where the information to be provided to road users changes with time. Electronic
signs are an integral component of motorway management systems, variable speed limit zones, incident and
event management schemes, warning systems at high crash risk sites, worksite traffic management and
delivery of road user information. From the Safe System perspective, electronic signs contribute to safe
roads, safe speeds and safe road user objectives. Incident management systems that utilise electronic signs
also can be used to facilitate emergency vehicle access to crashes involving injury to roads users. This
application supports post-crash response by emergency services, which is often recognised as the fifth pillar
of the Safe System.
As with static signs, effective and efficient communication with drivers and other road users will elicit the
desired response and enhance safety. The objective is to minimise the cognitive workload (particularly in
complex situations), avoid distraction and minimise processing and response times. To achieve this,
electronic signs must be:
• Legible
• Positioned appropriately (both longitudinally and laterally)
• Consistent (with other signs and the road environment)
• Concise
• Relevant.
Electronic signs are located either over or adjacent to the roadway, and can be used as regulatory, warning,
guide and information signs. They can be implemented as permanent (fixed) or portable (typically trailer-
mounted) signs. The National ITS Architecture will increasingly assist ascertaining the operational
requirements and information flows to help inform the use of electronic signs.
Manual operation relies primarily on a pre-prepared set of generic messages; free text may also be used.
Semi-automatic operation utilises vehicle detectors or closed-circuit television (CCTV) cameras that may be
linked to alarms to provide warning of an incident and to recommend specific messages for implementation
by a traffic management centre operator.
Fully automated systems require the integration of incident detection systems with message selection and
deployment for the management of incidents, congestion and impact of adverse weather conditions.
The general principles in AS 1742.2 that apply to standard retroreflective signs also apply to the provision of
VMS and CMS. The effectiveness of any road sign depends on three factors – conspicuity, legibility, and
comprehension.
The factors involved in the design of effective road sign faces described in Section 3.4 also apply to VMS.
Like static signs, VMS must be conspicuous and easily read at normal operating speeds.
There is no single formula to produce VMS that are easily comprehended. Simplicity, clarity, and meeting the
needs of motorists are important factors. Guidance for achieving effective VMS in terms of conspicuity,
legibility and comprehension is given in this section.
5.1.2 Applications
VMS are widely used to provide road users with information about road and traffic conditions. They have the
ability to display a large number of individual messages for the purpose of directing, informing, warning or
guiding road users. VMS may be used as individual signs to address a particular issue, or as part of a
system to manage traffic along a road or within an area. A common systemic use is for the management of
traffic during incidents on high-volume urban motorways or on the arterial road network. VMS may be
permanent, or temporary signs mounted on a trailer or vehicle to meet a short-term requirement.
VMS are used for a broad range of applications relating to incidents, traffic congestion and management,
and road safety, including but not limited to:
• incident management at a site or along a route, usually a motorway, to inform drivers of an incident and
action required; this may include traffic diversion through the use of ‘condition’ and ‘closed’ signs on an
adjacent arterial
• warnings about traffic or road conditions downstream of the sign
• warning of situations that have the potential to be a road safety problem
• provision of information on future planned events
• control of traffic during roadworks, maintenance or major events
• guidance of drivers seeking parking areas
• travel time information
• height detection devices
• weather conditions (e.g. wind, fog, snow, ice)
• advisory speed, trailer mounted
• speedometer check
• approaches to signalised intersections that have severe sight distance restrictions due to horizontal or
vertical curvature
• approaches to rural intersections that have a safety problem.
Figure 5.1 shows an example of a cantilever-mounted VMS with a typical message relating to changed traffic
conditions ahead on a major arterial route.
VMS therefore enable direct and timely communication with road users to provide an extensive range of
important information. However, this flexibility is accompanied by a responsibility to provide consistent
information in a standard format, and to use the devices only for appropriate purposes.
Current practice in VMS implementation is well developed in several countries (e.g. Highways Agency 2016a
and 2016b, Paniati 2004). Guidance for application in Australia and New Zealand is provided in this section.
Sign dimensions
The dimensions of a VMS are dependent on its location, as higher speeds require larger character sizes in
order to provide suitable legibility distance. The character size and number of characters and lines will dictate
the overall dimensions of the VMS along with whether it displays a pictogram or not. A guide for overhead
and side-mounted signs for various lateral offsets from the carriageway is provided in Section 5.2.2.
Guidance on the impact of the VMS dimensions due to the use of pictograms is provided in Section 5.3.1.
The generally higher speeds in rural areas and on urban motorways require larger characters and hence
larger VMS than for arterial roads in urban areas. Rural roads tend to have more spacious road reserves that
can accommodate the larger signs. In determining the size, consideration must be given to the visual impact
on an area, particularly when used on urban arterial roads, although in some rural situations interference with
views can also be a consideration. In urban situations the sign size and location may often be constrained by
lack of space or the existence of other infrastructure.
Matrix characteristics
A permanent VMS should be capable of displaying a maximum of four lines of text with each line able to
display a maximum of 18 characters. For higher speed roads (e.g. with operational speeds greater than
80 km/h) it may be desirable to limit the display to three lines of text. It may also be preferred if the message
can be displayed on one frame but no more than two.
To ensure clarity of the message adequate spacing between the characters and the lines must be provided.
The matrix characteristics and spacing between characters and lines of the VMS should be undertaken in
accordance with AS 1742, AS 1744 and AS 4852.1.
Fonts
Fonts used in VMS should be undertaken in accordance with AS 1742, AS 1743 and AS 1744. As outlined in
Section 4.3.6, AS 1744 provides the standard alphabet to be used.
If road agencies wish to use multi-colours in VMS messages beyond the guidance outlined above, it is
recommended that:
• When implementing multi-colour VMS a study should be undertaken either through a trial or in
simulations to obtain an understanding of how effectively the messages will be understood by drivers.
• In order to increase the effectiveness of the multi-coloured VMS across the driving population, usage
should be consistent across the jurisdiction. In particular the use of colour on VMS should be consistent
along the entire corridor.
• As some colours may be seen easier during the day than at night, consideration should be given to the
time and duration of the intended VMS message.
• As a proportion of the population is colour blind, consideration should be given to the readability of the
message by that group.
In daytime the luminance of both the message and background is important. A contrast ratio, which is a
measure of the luminance of the VMS message display divided by the luminance of the background of the
sign face, of between 8 and 12 provides optimum legibility.
Luminance ratio levels are set so that the presence of external sources of light will not cause a lowering of
the contrast of the message such that it becomes ineffective. If the VMS has a variable luminance setting,
then the luminance ratio requirement should be met first and then the minimum levels of luminance must be
met at that luminance level or greater. Test procedures are available for the measurement of luminance ratio.
At night some method of automatic dimming is required, as the levels of luminance necessary for effective
daytime operation will cause far too much glare for drivers at night. It is therefore appropriate to specify
different levels of luminance for different ambient light conditions.
Borders
Practice varies for the provision of borders. Generally, they are not considered necessary; however, some
road agencies may wish to increase the conspicuity (or target value) of VMS by providing a 50 mm wide
retroreflective tape around the perimeter of the front cover of the VMS.
5.2.2 Legibility
Legibility distance is primarily dictated by the size of characters, the type of alphabet and whether upper or
lower-case letters are used. Other factors include obstructions and observation angle. The sign legibility
distances for a VMS are the same as those described in Section 4.3.7 for normal retroreflective signs,
comprising the cumulative distances travelled whilst:
• observing or scanning the sign
• reading the sign
• no longer being able to read the sign (i.e. too close, angle too great).
VMS can generally be regarded as satisfactory within viewing angles of 10° horizontally and 5° vertically as
described in Section 4.3.7. Specifications for VMS should provide an adequate luminance ratio to ensure
that the signs can be read at these angles.
In order to determine the legibility distance required for VMS, practitioners may utilise the legibility distance
formula contained in Section 4.3.7 making allowance for the number of frames, time the frame is displayed,
viewing angle and offset.
In addition to guidance outlined in Section 4.3.7, Appendix B provides guidance used by MRWA to determine
the sight distance to direction sign. The guidance contained in Appendix B is also relevant to electronic signs
and therefore practitioners may consider this guidance for application within their jurisdictions.
For permanent VMS, the legibility distance should allow for the maximum practical message length (taken as
eight words per frame). For mobile VMS, the formula should be used for shorter messages if necessary.
For horizontally offset signs, the minimum likely offset distance (at 60 km/h) comprises 3 m for the driver’s
position in a single approach lane, a clearance/footpath width of 1.75 m and a half-sign width of 1.25 m,
giving a total offset of 6 m.
For a four-lane motorway, there may be 3 m for the driver’s position, two full lanes (11.1 m), 3 m shoulder, a
clearance of up to 1 m behind the barrier and a 3 m half sign width, giving a total offset of about 21 m.
Where a VMS can be used to provide a variety of messages composed of words it is necessary to establish
priorities for the display of the different types of messages. Messages related to safety or traffic flow at a
particular site should take precedence over those providing less critical information. For example, the
following is a suggested descending order of priority based on road safety and traffic flow considerations:
• current traffic incident or event (i.e. road closures and hazard warning which may include hazards
associated with incidents such as a crash, severe weather events such as floods or current roadworks)
• severe congestion
• planned (future) roadwork
• weather-related conditions that could impact on safety such as heavy rain, fog
• parking guidance
• planned (future) special events.
In some scenarios (such as in managed motorways and where the travel time technology is available) it may
be appropriate to display travel time/motorway conditions if conditions are such that one of the
aforementioned message types is not required. For arterial road applications, filler or standby messages,
which may only be displayed if considered useful and appropriate by the jurisdiction may be used as default
messages. Campaign/promotion messages (e.g. road safety messages, community benefit messages and
general transportation messages) can fall into this category.
Pictograms in conjunction with text enable the VMS to display more information on the one frame and/or
reduce the amount of text required. This can enable messages to be displayed on one frame as the
pictogram can display the cause of an event or problem while the text conveys the action to be taken. An
example of a VMS display utilising pictograms in conjunction with text is shown in Figure 5.2.
Pictograms used for VMS applications are dependent on the capability of the sign, the operational
characteristics of the motorway and the messages which the road agencies wish to convey. As a result, VMS
need to be designed with the size of the pictogram content in mind. With the latest VMS technology, the
preference now is for one integrated hardware panel that can display either pictogram or text of both as
opposed to a separate panel to display the pictogram or text separately.
Table 5.1 provides examples of pictograms that are used by some road agencies. Practitioners can use
these pictograms within their own jurisdiction, however they should ensure that other pictograms for the
same purpose are not already specified and that any pictogram is consistent with use across the jurisdiction.
Where jurisdictions do not specify pictograms, practitioners are encouraged to use those depicted in
Table 5.1. Further pictograms may be developed based on the characteristics of the road environment.
However, they should be readily recognised and understood by drivers and therefore may need to be subject
to comprehension testing in accordance with AS 2342 6. In addition, where symbols are specified in AS 1742
for the same purpose and/or are outlined in the Australian Road Rules, the symbols should be utilised in
order to maintain consistency.
5.3.2 Abbreviations
Use of abbreviations should generally be limited to those that are highly recognised, independent of their context
or are adequately understood when used with ‘prompt’ words (e.g. prep for prepare if it precedes to stop).
A list of recommended abbreviations and standard abbreviations that rely on a prompt word is provided in
Appendix C.
Time-related information
It is essential that time-related information shown on VMS be accurate and current if the system is to be
credible to users. To achieve this will require high quality data gathering, usually automatic. The types of
time-related information that can be considered for use on VMS include:
• travel time on highways
• delays on highways
• time saved on alternative routes
• delay avoidance on alternative routes.
Driver information systems that provide travel time information on motorways are in use in many places.
Data is collected automatically through tagged vehicles or pavement loops and suitably calibrated
algorithms. These systems aim to reduce delay and driver frustration and make better use of the available
road capacity. They are generally considered to have some influence on a driver’s choice of route.
Similarly, information on delays on highways and time saved on alternative routes requires a sophisticated
data collection and analysis system and procedure. Displays of time saved on alternative routes could lead
to a concentration of diverted traffic on one route, even when it may be desirable to spread the load between
the alternative routes. This application would only be appropriate in a highly monitored network.
6 AS 2342 is proposed to be withdrawn. Once withdrawn it is proposed that AS 1743 will cover the subject matter.
Flooding
VicRoads and MRWA have outlined that their preference is to use the alternative pictogram for congestion.
The traffic controller pictogram is considered not applicable for use on motorways.
VicRoads and MRWA may use an alternative pictogram to this. Practitioners in these jurisdictions should refer to
jurisdictional guidelines.
To be used for general hazards where a more specific pictogram for the hazard is not available. When this is used
the event type should be stipulated as the first line of the VMS.
Not all LUMS will permit the use of the 40 km/h ahead pictogram.
Problem statements define the type of incident that will affect traffic conditions. Such incidents could include
accidents, roadworks, traffic congestion, environmental conditions and hazards on the road. Examples of
problem statements include accident, congestion, roadwork and traffic signals.
These statements describe the location of the incident to which the VMS message refers. The location may
be described in terms of the distance to the incident, place names, road/street names, suburbs, route
numbers, exit numbers/names, road infrastructure and landmarks. The location description used will depend
on circumstances. In general, road names are preferred to route numbers.
Sometimes it will be necessary to refine the location description by the use of modifiers. Recommended
location modifiers include after, near, ahead, at, next, left, right and centre. In many cases the word ahead is
a statement of the obvious and may be omitted where it would add to the number of frames required for the
message.
When distances are displayed on VMS they should not be too far from the location, as drivers may forget the
message displayed before reaching the destination. A distance of five kilometres may generally be regarded
as the maximum value.
Effect statements describe the state of the road or the effect the incident will have on traffic operations. A
delay statement is one specific type of effect statement. This can be displayed as major delays, minor
delays, [number] mins delay or [number] hrs delay. Alternatively, the statement may be displayed as delays
expected. Other examples of effects statements are heavy traffic and slow traffic.
The quantified statement should only be used where reliable information is available and can be regularly
updated. Delays of up to about 10 or 15 minutes are considered minor in urban and rural environments
respectively.
These statements are designed to gain the attention of a particular group of motorists rather than the normal
case of directing messages at all motorists. The attention statement identifies the target audience to whom
the action statement is directed, for example buses, trucks, high vehicles and local traffic.
Action statements describe what is required of the driver if the VMS message is to be effective and it is
therefore an essential element if some action by motorists is required. Typical examples of action statements
are reduce speed, use next exit and prepare to stop.
It should be noted that some action statements are not explicit, but require drivers to make decisions. Where
the capacity of a road is reduced but traffic can still use it, a signed detour may not be appropriate. In such
cases, drivers can be advised either to consider alternative routes or find alternative routes.
The message load is expressed in ‘units of information’. Studies have shown that an eight-word message is
approaching the maximum processing limit for drivers. In addition, no more than two units of information
should be shown per line of VMS message.
A unit of information provides an answer to a question that a driver may pose. For example, ‘accident’ is a
one-word unit of information (a problem statement), ‘at Queen Street’ is regarded as a two-word unit (a
location statement) and ‘use next exit’ is a three-word unit (an action statement). A unit of information may
contain one to four words and a word would normally have two to eight characters. Some location names
may be longer than eight characters but message design should exclude any other words longer than eight
characters.
While two-frame messages are acceptable, every effort should be made to limit a message to a single-frame
display. The design legibility distance does not allow most drivers to read a three-frame message and these
should therefore be avoided wherever possible. It is recommended that filler or standby messages be limited
to a single frame.
Messages should not roll across the frame, scroll down the frame or flash. Changes of display should be
made by completely blanking out the current frame and introducing the new frame as a complete display.
Transition effects should not be used.
Where a message is contained in two consecutive frames, an interval of 0.5 seconds duration is
recommended between the last frame and the repeated first frame. Where a message is to be changed, a
blank display of at least two seconds should be used between the end of one message and the start of a
different message.
Time and date information may be required for VMS messages providing advance advice of special events
or roadwork that will affect future traffic operations. One week is normally considered to be an appropriate
advance notice period.
Information may also be provided on when an event or incident is expected to end. This element will contain
time duration, days of the week, day periods, time of day, time periods, dates and/or date periods. Time
duration in minutes should be shown in five or ten-minute time increments.
Dates and date periods are not comprehended nearly as well by drivers as days of the week. They should
therefore only be used for major occurrences and when the dates involved are at least a week into the future.
VMS messages (including defining locations on VMS such as place names or road names) must be fully
compatible with static signs, particularly direction signs. VMS should complement the existing static signs
rather than simply duplicating them.
Where incident management through detection or closed circuit television (CCTV) cameras is in place, this
should be integrated with the VMS system as much as possible. In particular, downstream cameras and/or
incident detection should support VMS wherever possible.
Accurate VMS messages are vital if they are to be credible to drivers and achieve high levels of driver
confidence and compliance. Credibility can be substantially aided by:
• Ensuring that the message is relevant and accurate. Unless the accuracy of incoming information can be
verified, the use of a more general message may be appropriate.
• Using CCTV, where available, to verify the type and extent of an incident (problem), the return to normal
operation, and hence the need to remove or change the message.
• Exercising restraint in the use of filler messages, especially in situations where an incident has occurred
where display of a general road safety message for example would be irrelevant.
• Avoiding the use of ambiguous or long messages.
VMS should be monitored and maintained to ensure that letters and words within messages are complete.
Faulty pixels that remove sections of the characters or unnecessarily activate other sections of the frame
adversely affect the integrity of the signs.
In addition, VMS must be positioned so that road users have time to respond to the messages provided, and
therefore should be positioned an adequate distance in advance of major decision points. On motorways
major decision points occur at exit ramps as these are most likely to be used for diversions, although in some
instances median crossings are constructed for this purpose.
The locations of VMS for motorway management systems will depend on the extent of the system that is
required to meet traffic management objectives, and the cost that a road agency is prepared to incur to meet
the requirements for a particular site.
In general, VMS should be placed longitudinally in accordance with the principles for location of static signs
(Section 4.5.1). The location of VMS will depend on the objective and extent of the application, the nature of
the site and the ability to obtain a suitable site in relation to other signs and structures.
VMS should not generally be placed within an interchange area or in close proximity to an on-ramp where
merging, frequent braking or weaving movements are common. The VMS location should also take account
of the need for drivers to respond to other important static signs in the area.
On urban arterial roads where traffic diversion is necessary or recommended, it is desirable that the VMS be
located 400 to 700 m in advance of the diversion point. On high-speed rural roads and motorways a greater
distance will normally be necessary (e.g. 900 to 1200 m of the decision point).
As a general rule, it is recommended that the first VMS to display a message for an incident should be not
more than 5 km upstream of a minor incident (not involving a lane blockage/closure) and not more than 8 km
upstream of an incident that involves substantial delays because of a lane blockage/closure. Signs more
remote than this should not display messages related to the incident. These maximum distances may relate
to rural roads and some parts of urban motorway networks, but are unlikely to relate to typical urban arterial
road networks. There may be exceptions on motorway systems where greater advance notice using VMS is
warranted, but this should only be done if it is possible to provide an effective message to encourage
diversion via suitable exits to alternative routes.
The lateral placement of VMS should comply with that required for static signs (Section 4.5.3). In addition to
this guidance the systematic deployment of VMS as part of a motorway management system usually
requires that all VMS are located on gantries, cantilevers or other overhead structures, as overhead signs
are the most effective way of conveying essential information to motorists.
Typically, gantries, or other overhead structure that spans the carriageway (e.g. bridge) should be used:
• where lane use management system (LUMS) signs are used (LUMS comprise an electronic speed limit
(ESL) and lane control signal (LCS) display – refer to Section 8.5.11) are used:
– in this case where LUMS are utilised it is acceptable (although not necessarily preferred) to also install
VMS on the same gantry (refer to Section 5.5.4 for further discussion on collocation with other signs)
– alternatively, VMS may be installed on any structure (separate gantry, cantilevered or other overhead
structure) subject to it meeting the legibility requirements, with consideration given to obscuration due
to a high percentage of heavy vehicles.
• on motorway carriageways that have four or more lanes.
On the approaches to exit ramps it is particularly important that the normal static advance exit and exit
position signs are coordinated with any VMS, LUMS and other signs/signals provided for traffic diversion or
other purposes. AS 1742.2 illustrates typical arrangements and spacings for static motorway exit signs within
which the VMS must be accommodated.
Further to the above, it is preferred to separate large VMS containing incident messages and lane control
from gantries that support the static direction signs. This is discussed further in Section 5.5.4.
Following a decision on the nature and extent of the motorway management system required, designers
should:
1. Determine static directional sign locations (highest priority) – as per guidance in AS 1742.2.
2. Determine LUMS and ESL sign locations within the direction sign layout. The typical design sequence for
LUMS and ESL sign placement is as follows:
a. relative to interchanges
b. within mid-blocks segments.
3. Determine VMS locations.
4. Determine other static sign locations.
Ideally, successive VMS should not be located within 1000 m of one another; however, if required, closer
spacing can be used.
Generally, VMS can be comfortably read when they are within 10° off-centre horizontally and 5° vertically of
a driver's line of sight (i.e. signs should not be located at 90° to the roadway). Sign placement should be
checked so that horizontal or vertical curves do not result in the sign being outside this range.
Although some standards and guidelines do not permit collocation of sign information, these have been
overtaken by current practice.
Dual collocation of LUMS with VMS or dual collocation of LUMS with direction signs (DS) is a practical
arrangement which is widely practised overseas and in Australia and New Zealand.
While triple collocation of LUMS, VMS and directional signs is practised internationally such as along UK
motorways, triple collocation is an emerging concept in Australia and New Zealand that is being discussed
by some road agencies.
Austroads (2015c) investigated the potential impact of collocating LUMS, VMS and/or DS through surveys
and simulation. The study confirmed that dual collocation of LUMS with VMS or dual collocation of LUMS
with DS appears to present no difficulties to drivers.
With triple collocation of signs, the study found that although drivers were generally able to cope with the
information displayed they usually did not like the complicated signs. As a result, it is recommended that the
signs should be used only in situations where other arrangements for displaying essential sign information
are impractical. Further, drivers’ behaviour and reactions to the signs should be monitored closely in the
period following any installation.
Given the above findings, the following guidelines should apply to the collocation of electronic signage:
• no collocation: preferred
• dual collocation of LUMS with VMS or dual collocation of LUMS with DS: acceptable
• triple collocation (i.e. collocating with a static sign and LUMS): not preferred but acceptable to trial if
constraints require it and limitations are applied to the display of the VMS and static sign (see below for
further guidance).
Although not preferred, where triple collocation is being considered the following guidelines should apply:
• VMS messages should be limited to one frame and no more than three lines at one word per line (e.g.
roadworks ahead or heavy delays ahead) unless the message is used to convey estimated travel time.
• Use of travel time messages in triple collocation scenarios is still being explored and it is felt by many that
their use in triple collocation is the most complicated message permitted. Due to the potential to overload
drivers, especially drivers not familiar with the area, the number of destinations displayed should be
limited. The number would be best determined based on an assessment of the complexity of the road
environment. For more complex road environments, it may be appropriate to limit the number of
destination to one, while for less complex road environment, two or three destinations may be acceptable.
• VMS colour should not be used unless to indicate the congestion level.
• Use of pictograms in the VMS should be avoided in order to keep the message simple.
• Road agencies should design the scope and evaluation methods of any field trial of triple collocation of
signs with extra caution and with driver behaviour closely monitored after the installation.
5.6.1 General
The systematic deployment of VMS has mainly been as part of motorway management systems that employ
a range of advanced techniques to allow road agencies to monitor and control motorway networks by
regulating traffic flows, speeds and movements across the network. However, it is expected that similar
systems will in time be used to improve the management of surface arterial road networks.
Motorway management systems and their underlying traffic management strategies rely on VMS and other
electronic signs and signals to provide the interface with road users. Electronic devices are used in a
systematic way and may regulate, warn or advise drivers in response to changing traffic, environmental, or
other road conditions. Such systems can satisfy the dual objectives of improving traffic efficiency and road
safety, thus contributing to safe mobility.
The extent of the signing and technology used in a particular system will vary depending on the objective
that the road agency has for the system. While incident management capability is a primary attribute of most
systems, the level of signing used can vary considerably. Also, consideration of the system requirements for
particular sections of motorway may lead to variation in the combination of signs provided.
The increasing use of variable speed limits as a traffic management tool has been facilitated by the
development of VMS technology. Section 5.7 covers this topic in more detail.
Incident management systems rely on the ability to relay processed information about road conditions
(including incidents) in a concise manner to road users. This is in order to encourage drivers to detour
around incidents and so avoid the further build-up of congestion in the area of the incident and to allow
responders to better respond to incidents. VMS should aim to provide warning and/or safety-critical
messages (e.g. accident ahead) along with incident/event messages. Latest best practice is for the VMS to
provide this in alternating form on the one VMS.
A key factor in providing effective signs is to present relevant information to the motorist in a clear and simple
way. In addition to VMS installations, driver information systems utilise other signs that also form part of the
incident management system.
Estimated travel time can be conveyed to drivers through multipurpose VMS as shown in Figure 5.3. This
allows for the one VMS to display travel time information during standard operating conditions, but also
enables the same VMS to display information about a major event such as a lane closure. Typically, the
travel time is displayed in minutes and may be undertaken in colour or accompanied by a colour display in
order to represent the level of congestion, that being red (heavy), yellow (medium) or green (light).
Figure 5.3: Example of travel time information being displayed on a multipurpose VMS which may also display
incident messages
Dedicated trip information signs may also be used on a road to which the information applies. These signs
inform motorists of the travel time to key exits. Typically, the sections that are labelled on the sign are static,
while the journey time is dynamic and displayed through the use of an LED display (Figure 5.4).
Trip condition signs (Figure 5.5) may provide information relating to travel time and congestion on an
intersecting route. They are positioned prior to the interchanges that enable access to that route. They may
display either an estimation of the travel time from the interchange to a major interchange on the intersecting
route or information on the trip conditions along the route (e.g. light, medium or heavy). The conditions may
be displayed in colours indicating the level of congestion.
For both the travel time and trip condition VMS, the preference now (unlike that shown in older versions of
the signs that are still in use as shown in Figure 5.4 and Figure 5.5) is for the VMS to display the destinations
in sequential order with the nearest destination at the top of the sign and the furthermost destination at the
bottom. The travel time numbers to various destinations are the total travel time from the location of the sign
to the destination and therefore should always be increasing from the top of the sign to the bottom
(Figure 5.6).
Arterial road VMS providing advance motorway condition information are placed at strategic locations on
arterial roads that ‘feed’ the motorway. The latest best practice is for these signs to be a full VMS matrix, as
shown in Figure 5.6, and for them to display the name of the motorway and travel time to key destinations.
Colour coding may also be used in order to give an indication of the level of congestion.
Figure 5.6: Example of an arterial road VMS providing advance motorway condition information
The signs may also comprise a normal retroreflective intersection direction sign (as shown in Figure 5.7) with
an LED/VMS panel indicating the level of congestion for the various segments of the motorway. On seeing
these signs drivers can decide whether to use the motorway or an alternative arterial route.
Electronic ramp control signs are located in a highly visible location just prior to the entrance ramp of a
motorway. They are VMS installations that display a variety of simple messages about use of the motorway.
They indicate if the motorway is closed, and control access by displaying messages such as motorway
closed and no left turn. Where ramp metering signals are used (refer to Section 8.6), the same VMS installed
at the entrance to the on-ramp can be used to display the motorway access control. Where ramp metering
signals are not installed, VMS will need to be installed to display the control. Figure 5.8 shows an example of
the various displays of the electronic ramp control signs. The primary purpose of their use is to be able to
close or limit access to a motorway at the particular on-ramp where the signs are installed in the event of a
major incident so as to prevent excessive congestion and therefore reduce the time taken to clear traffic and
return to normal operating conditions.
Lane control signs on motorways may be used in response to incidents in order to:
• close a lane or lanes on a carriageway and guide traffic past an incident
• close a carriageway beyond a motorway exit and divert traffic from the motorway during severe incidents
or significant maintenance operations.
Section 8.5.11 outlines the various symbols and their usage for overhead lane control.
On high-volume motorways the safe and effective closure of lanes or a carriageway should take place
through the display of signs on a number of successive gantries.
Further information on lane control signals is given in Section 8.5.11 and their use in lane management
systems is described in Austroads (2019d).
Weather warning systems may be used on motorways and non-motorway arterial roads (usually rural
highways) where a range of conditions related to weather have an adverse effect on road safety through
their impact on a driver’s performance or the road surface.
Use should be limited to scenarios where the weather event will have an adverse effect on safety and
requires drivers to change their normal driving behaviour for that particular section of road (i.e. where
weather conditions require drivers to decrease their speed to maintain safety). The warning may also be
accompanied by an ESL that legally requires drivers to reduce speed.
Reversible lane arrangements (known as tidal flow in some jurisdictions) occur where the directional use of a
lane is reversed to provide additional capacity in the peak traffic direction. For example, a six-lane undivided
road may be operated as three lanes each way during off-peak periods, and be changed to four lanes for the
peak direction and two lanes for the counter-peak direction during peak periods.
In order to achieve a satisfactory level of safety, reversible lanes are managed by overhead lane signals, the
permitted use of lanes being designated by arrow signals, and prohibitions on use designated by a red cross
over the appropriate lanes.
Reversible flow lanes are most common on arterial roads in Australia and New Zealand but can be utilised
on motorways provided that satisfactory traffic management and median crossings are developed. Examples
of gantry signals for reversible lane operation are shown in Figure 5.9. Such treatments have provided
improved levels of service and capacity at relatively low cost.
A critical aspect of reversible lane treatments is the signing and delineation at the ends of the arrangements
where they transition to normal operation. Signs to advise drivers of the ‘off-centre’ operation and the times
to which it applies are provided in advance of the treatment. It is difficult to achieve a clear lane marking
arrangement within the terminal areas of the treatment, but pavement lights have been used successfully for
this purpose (Section 6.7.5).
Use of permanent VMS for incident management or driver information systems in Australia and New Zealand
has been confined to motorways. However, it is expected that as the use of intelligent transport system (ITS)
technology increases within vehicles and traffic management systems, adequate data and system capability
to provide incident management and driver information systems on non-motorway arterial road networks will
become available. The deployment of VMS more broadly throughout the arterial road system may raise
issues regarding the extent of their use, location and size.
The minimum spacings indicated in Section 5.5 are also considered appropriate for urban arterial roads. For
these roads the key decision points are major intersections with other arterial roads that have a high potential
to be used for traffic diversion. VMS used for this purpose should desirably be positioned 400–700 m prior to
the diversion.
An important function of incident detection and managements systems is to provide rapid access by
emergency services to critical incidents. The World Health Organisation (2016) recognises post-crash
response as the fifth pillar of the Safe System. Early treatment of vehicle occupants or road workers injured
in crashes ensures that the severity of injuries is minimised and increases the chances of survival.
Height detection systems are installed to detect vehicles that are too high to pass under low structures, often
old railway overpasses of arterial roads where the bridge will usually have a low clearance. These systems
are associated with routes that carry a substantial number of trucks.
A laser-beam detector may be used to detect vehicles that are too high. Typically, once a detection occurs
the system activates flashing lights mounted on a height advisory sign or activates a VMS where it is
appropriate to provide more information on the action required of the truck driver. CB radio break-in as
discussed in Section 10.2.1 may also be used as a supplementary form of warning communication.
These systems inform truck drivers not to proceed along the current route and may provide appropriate
direction to alternative routes. The provision of height detection systems reduces damage to important
structures and minimises community costs.
Changeable Lane
Control Signal
Note: In this scenario the middle lane is reversible with the direction of allowable travel indicated by the changeable lane
control signal. Here the lane is closed to traffic moving away from the camera.
These are systems whereby vehicle speeds are detected (using laser speed-detection equipment, for
example) and displayed on an electronic sign (Figure 5.10) mounted beside or over the road.
With the use of speed cameras for enforcement and a reduction in speeding infringement tolerances in some
jurisdictions, the system can provide an important service to drivers.
Displayed speed readings are generally within 1 to 2 km/h of the actual speed, and the maximum speed
displayed is usually limited in order to discourage irresponsible speeding behaviour at the site.
Vehicle activated intersection and road geometry signs can be effective in warning drivers of hazardous
intersections or curves. They may be applied to:
• a signalised intersection on the outskirts of a city or town where drivers are failing to adjust from the
high-speed rural environment to the urban environment, evidenced by an unacceptably high number of
crashes
• an unsignalised intersection that has an unacceptable crash history and funds are not yet available for
permanent treatment
• a vertical crest curve on the approach to traffic signals where insufficient sight distance exists to the
intersection or to the back of a stationary queue of vehicles
• a sharp horizontal curve that has a history of run-off-road crashes (Kathmann & Cannon 2001).
• the main road approaches to low volume rural intersections where traffic approaching on the side road
activates a reduced speed limit on the main road.
The above examples illustrate applications of VMS signs to influence driver behaviour to encourage safer
road use and safe speeds.
Vehicle activated warning signs may also be targeted at specific vehicle types, for example, where heavy
vehicles can be susceptible to rollovers on horizontal curves if driven at excessive speed as shown in
Figure 5.11.
Standard static road signs (including warning signs) will often be provided in these situations, with the vehicle
activated sign being in the form of a VMS or CMS to alert drivers to particular conditions or to emphasise the
condition to which the static signs relate. It is important that VMS used for this purpose are appropriately
integrated with necessary static signs or located with adequate separation from the static signs (Section 4.5.2).
The signs used to address the signalised intersection problem usually comprise a traffic signal warning sign
and a prepare to stop panel with in-built or attached flashing yellow lights in accordance with AS 1742.14
(Figure 8.35). The lights are activated at the appropriate time by the signal controller.
Hazardous unsignalised intersections and those with a sight distance problem may be provided with an
electronic sign that alternately flashes too fast and slow down when vehicles are detected approaching at a
higher than desirable speed. These signs may be accompanied by an electronic speed limit sign to
emphasise the limit that applies (Figure 5.12).
Vehicle activated signs in the form of either VMS or CMS may also be used to control the speed of vehicles
approaching relatively sharp horizontal curves (Figure 5.13).
Figure 5.13: Examples of vehicle activated signs on an approach to a curve in the form of a CMS and VMS
application
Austroads (2014a) explored various treatments for reducing speeds on rural roads. This included vehicle
activated signs on the approach to intersections and curves. Key findings including description, benefits,
implementation issues and treatment life are outlined in Table 5.2.
Table 5.2: Key findings on vehicle activated signs on the approach to intersections and curves
Buses (and trams) can be equipped with a global positioning system (GPS) unit or other forms of automatic
vehicle location technologies to provide real-time location information for fleet management and passenger
information. The usual timetable and the real-time arrival information are displayed at a bus stop using
variable message panels and can assist in managing passenger expectations.
The real-time bus location information can be made available on the Internet. With wired or wireless Internet
and other user-subscribed services through short message service (SMS), a rail passenger can access the
arrival time of a scheduled bus when the passenger gets at a station. Hence, the passenger can plan ahead.
The bus driver can also have the rail timetable and potentially the driver can delay the departure time from
the bus stop within a certain tolerance to catch the rail passengers that seek a mode interchange at the stop.
The task of dynamically integrating rail and bus transit services is a challenging one that can benefit from ITS
measures.
An example of a sign displaying passenger information at a bus stop is shown in Figure 5.14. Similar
technology can be applied to tram routes. ITS is also used to provide priority for buses and trams on arterial
road networks and these initiatives often involve the use of VMS. For example, Figure 5.15 shows a sign
used in the dynamic fairway system introduced in Melbourne to clear queues of motor vehicles from the lane
in front of trams and thus reduce the delay to tram services.
Note: In this example traffic must turn right to clear the tracks for trams to proceed straight ahead.
Parking plays an important role in the provision of road transport services. In many cities, there is a mix of
on-street and off-street parking facilities. Although the primary purpose of arterial roads is to carry through
traffic, on-street parking on arterial roads in off-peak periods is common and motorists are familiar with the
disruption it causes to traffic flow.
Off-street parking can also place increased pressure on the road system by drivers searching for parking at
popular destinations such as city centres. Congestion from increased traffic circulation has a flow-on effect,
inhibiting traffic movements in surrounding areas. Parking guidance systems utilising dynamic signs can be
installed on arterial roads and other busy roads leading into central city areas to help improve the flow of
traffic and reduce congestion.
Dynamic signing systems for parking are provided to advise motorists at critical locations around a city of the
number of spaces that are available in large off-street car parking stations. The information displayed on the
signs can be updated manually or automatically. The signs usually advise motorists of the:
• name and remaining capacity of the car park
• location of the car park
• locations of other car parks in surrounding streets.
The VMS allow drivers to make informed decisions in advance on where to park. In areas where several car
parks are connected to a parking guidance system, such as in a city centre, car parks can be connected to a
central computer via modems. Individual car parks can measure occupancy levels using inductive loops,
infrared or video detection technology and update the central computer, which in turn updates the various
signs in the area with occupancy levels.
In large cities it is usual to have parking guidance systems provided for different sectors within the city. The
sectors may be given a name or a colour coding so that drivers can easily relate signs and information to the
correct sector.
The planning, design and implementation of a parking guidance system requires a number of measures to
be considered:
• a parking area master plan for the particular city should be used as the basis for identifying the grouping
of parking areas to be included in various sectors, both those existing and those likely to be established
within a short to medium term
• the definition of the sectors will provide the basis for the signing scheme by establishing the location of
signs required to provide advance information relating to each sector, and to provide guidance of vehicles
from the vicinity of a full parking area to an unfilled parking area
• the means of defining a sector, by name or by colour
• the type of message textural or pictogram.
The sign should contain only that information required to direct drivers to the parking stations. Extraneous
information should not be allowed. The sign should therefore contain:
• the names of the parking areas or sector
• arrows to indicate the direction to be taken
• the status of the parking area (pictogram or number of spaces).
The convention for the arrangement of arrows on the sign face must match any corresponding static signing
and comply with AS 1742.2 for direction signs, as follows:
• a left-turn arrow is to the left of the legend
• a right-turn arrow is to the right of the legend
• an arrow for a straight-ahead movement can be to the left or right of the legend, and in such a way as to
avoid arrows being directly above or below each other.
Requirements for ESL signs are set out in AS 1742.4. They may be used with a general VMS, but it is not
considered good practice to incorporate speed limit signs into a single display including other message
signs.
The potential benefits of variable speed limits include reduced numbers of crashes, reduced crash severity,
improved traffic flow, a lower probability of incidents and, in some cases, reduced delays. ESL may also be
considered for installation in situations characterised by:
• a history of high crash rates related to high traffic speeds and high traffic volumes during identifiable times
• large variations in vehicle speeds (e.g. sudden stopping)
• periods of high risk of conflict with unprotected road users
• significant traffic congestion and queuing
• a history of dangerous driving conditions during adverse weather or road conditions.
In order to enforce variable speed limits, it is essential that records are kept of the times when various speed
limits are in operation.
5.7.1 Motorways
ESL signs may be used on motorways to impose a lower speed limit and improve safety and capacity. Use
of ESL and in particular LUMS (comprising an electronic speed limit (ESL) and lane control signal (LCS)
display) relies on the development of a business case to demonstrate the enhanced safety and efficiency
outcomes relative to the investment in infrastructure (which can be significant depending on the length of
route). Key considerations for the use of LUMS for any project include:
• requirements for increased capacity due to excessive demand and flow breakdown, including comparison
of options for use of the emergency lane (full or part-time) compared with conventional road widening.
• requirements for improved incident management (i.e. the need to divert traffic from the incident lane and
improve access for emergency vehicles) above the existing capability for the route.
• requirements to improve safety as a result of inclement traffic conditions such as during congestion and
bad weather; LUMS and ESL systems should only be installed on sections that experience recurrent
conditions, and therefore installation is likely to deliver significant benefits over the system lifecycle.
• requirements for enhanced environmental conditions (i.e. air quality and noise) in response to
government policy directives.
In Australia and New Zealand, variable speed limits are applied to all lanes in the one direction of travel for a
single carriageway as illustrated in Figure 5.18.
Variable speed limits may be activated automatically or manually through a traffic management centre. The
ESL signs may be mounted on posts besides the motorway or placed overhead on gantries or existing
structures. Generally, it is considered that side-mounted signs, installed in pairs, are satisfactory for
carriageways with three or less lanes and that overhead mounting is desirable for carriageways that have
four or more lanes. For motorways that comprise three lanes and carry a high percentage of trucks,
overhead mounting is considered desirable as the high percentage of trucks can impede sight lines to side-
mounted signs for vehicles in the middle lane.
Austroads (2019d) provides further advice on the operational aspects of using ESL on motorways.
Figure 5.18: ESL above each lane of the carriageway to indicate the limit
ESL signs are also used on arterial roads at locations where excessive vehicle speeds contribute to
unacceptable safety risks, but full-time lower limits are inappropriate because of the time-based nature of a
particular safety issue. This may occur at regular times (e.g. morning peak) or irregular times (e.g. during
adverse weather conditions, major traffic incidents). The signs are now increasingly being used in some
jurisdictions for shopping centre precincts or school zones on arterial or local roads.
In order to increase conspicuity, particularly when a reduction in speed is implemented, the inner sections of
the red annulus of the speed limit display may be flashed. In order to comply with speed signage
conventions, the outside section of the red annulus should remain steady (i.e. illuminated and non-flashing).
This is outlined further in Section 5.7.3.
Outlined below are recommendations for the ESL sign size, brightness and flashing requirements. They are
a result of consensus being achieved amongst Australian and New Zealand road agencies as outlined in
Austroads (2015b).
It is recommended that road agencies adopt the static sign size (and design) as outlined in AS 1742.4 and
AS 1743. When ESL are designed for specific applications, the size requirements as shown in Table 5.3
must also be considered.
Location Size
School/shopping zones Size B(1)
Tunnels Size B, though Size A can be used where size constraints prohibit use of Size B
Managed motorways Size C
Size C on other high-speed roads
Other
Size B for all other cases
The minimum size of enhanced school zone signs (i.e. when flashing annulus and flashing conspicuity devices are
incorporated with static speed limit signs for school zones) could be Size A.
Source: Based on AS 1742.4 and AS 1743.
The design of ESL signs should meet the requirements of AS 5156 with suitable/sufficient conspicuity.
Based on consultations with road agency practitioners, there may be a flaring effect issue with illuminated
numerals for the signs, particularly for smaller sized signs. The intensity of the illumination will affect the level
of flaring experienced and thus the illumination should be adjusted based on the lighting conditions,
especially during daylight hours. However, this may be difficult to control due to the different lighting
conditions throughout the day. Despite the smaller size regularly used in road tunnels, flaring should not be
an issue due to the more controlled lighting environment.
When displaying the normal speed limit, all pixel rings of the annulus must be illuminated. When displaying
other than the default speed limit, the outermost ring of the red annulus must be illuminated and non-flashing
to satisfy the regulatory status of the sign, with all other inner rings flashing.
Portable VMS are used for traffic management purposes in the following circumstances:
• at road construction and maintenance sites
• in the areas surrounding major events
• for incident management where permanent VMS are not available or are inoperative, or where the
spacing of permanent VMS is unable to give adequate warning of a major incident
• to encourage lower speeds in local streets.
Portable VMS are generally used at roadwork sites or in association with major events to:
• pre-warn motorists of road construction or maintenance activities, or events that may cause delay during
some future period
• advise motorists of likely delays and suitable alternative routes during the duration of the works or event.
This information enables motorists to plan their trips so that they may use other routes and do not contribute
to congestion or other problems in the area.
The use of traffic control devices for works on roads is covered in AS 1742.3 (which is currently being
updated with an expected completion date of 2017). The standard includes vehicle-mounted flashing arrow
signs and requirements for messages relating to roadworks. It is also important that VMS at roadwork sites
complement the signing arrangements provided in standards.
Local government authorities often use trailer-mounted speed signs to inform motorists if they are travelling
in excess of the posted speed limit. This is a similar use to the permanent speed indicator signs described in
Section 5.6.8, but has the advantage of portability to enable a broad coverage of the local road network.
These temporary speed signs can be effectively used when positioned on local or collector/distributor roads
if when there has been a permanent change to the speed limit. This helps motorists to adapt to the change.
Where portable VMS are used to convey messages about measured speeds it is important to ensure that the
devices are set up precisely to achieve a satisfactory level of accuracy.
The principles for legibility, location, and sign and message design apply to both permanent and portable
VMS. However, the following aspects require consideration in using and locating portable signs:
• Adequate reading distance should be available, allowing for any obstructions.
• The lateral placement should be such that the sign is easily read.
• Where practicable, they should be placed on the verge behind any existing shoulder.
• They must not be placed on bicycle lanes or on shared footpaths.
• Where possible, they should be placed outside of the clear zone corresponding to the prevailing traffic
speed.
• The signs should be located clear of any roadside furniture, side streets and driveways, so that required
visibility to permanent signs and sight distances for entering drivers are not compromised.
• They should be placed at least 300 m from the nearest permanent VMS.
• When placed on footways adequate horizontal and vertical clearance should be provided for pedestrians,
including persons in wheelchairs.
• They should not be placed on both sides of a carriageway at the same location if separate signs are
needed for each side of the road (e.g. different messages or visibility problems).
• Signs should be turned 3 to 5° away from the perpendicular to the edge of the carriageway to reduce
glare.
• If use is intermittent throughout the duration of an incident or event, the sign should be turned away from
drivers when it is not being used for messages.
• The sign trailer should be anchored to prevent it being moved under wind loading or by vandals.
Various message statements for use on VMS at roadwork sites are included in Appendix D.
Further to the above conditions, it is important, particularly where used on major arterials heavily monitored
and controlled by the road agency’s traffic management centre (TMC) that the temporary VMS is integrated
with the TMC operation. The level of integration should be sufficient to enable TMC operators to understand,
in real time, what messages are displayed on the VMS so that operators can use this knowledge, in addition
to knowledge of the traffic flow (e.g. through CCTV footage), to understand current traffic conditions and
therefore implement appropriate traffic management strategies. This can include advising motorists upstream
of certain conditions in a manner that is consistent with messages displayed on the VMS located at the
roadwork site. This may not always be possible when knowledge of what message is displayed on the VMS
is unknown.
6. Pavement Markings
6.1 General
Pavement markings are all the lines, symbols, patterns, messages, numerals, or other devices set in the
pavement or applied or attached to the pavement or kerb to regulate, warn or guide traffic. They are a very
effective way of providing guidance for motorists and other road users (e.g. bicyclists, public transport users)
as the markings are generally within the driver’s field of view. They may act as a supplement to other traffic
control devices but often they are the only effective way to convey regulations and warnings to drivers.
Pavement markings, along with signs, represent the most fundamental way to communicate with road users.
Effective and efficient communication supports the Safe System by contributing to safe roads, safe speeds
and safe road users. Some pavement markings are also critical to the effectiveness of emerging
technologies, such as lane keeping assist, which contribute to safer vehicles.
All road users are highly dependent upon markings for their guidance and safety. Markings have many
functions, including separating traffic streams travelling in either the same or opposing directions, defining
the priority at conflict points (including pedestrians priority), providing warning to drivers who might drift from
the traffic lane (audio-tactile edge and centre line markings) and warning of hazards.
Markings are highly standardised, which aids comprehension, reduces reaction time and maximises the
likelihood of appropriate road user response and behaviour. Whilst innovation with markings is encouraged,
care must be exercised when considering novel or unconventional uses. It is important to understand how
drivers might respond to new types of markings and consider possible unintended consequences before they
are actually trialed on the road. Advice from human factor experts may be helpful. Confusing, complex or
misleading markings will compromise road user safety.
The highly standardised nature of road markings is likely to become especially important in the future as
increasing numbers of vehicles are able to read the road in some way.
Markings are often used in conjunction with each other to provide a traffic treatment for any given situation.
For example, raised retroreflective pavement markers (RRPMs) are often installed adjacent to painted lines
or traffic islands.
Signs that are used to regulate or warn drivers are often accompanied by road markings. While it is not
always possible, the most effective road designs ensure that drivers are able to see road markings (i.e. not
only the signs) and have sufficient time to respond and take appropriate action (e.g. to merge or stop). The
provision of satisfactory sight distances should ensure that this requirement is met.
AS 1742 provides examples of the use of pavement markings for different situations and treatments.
Standard patterns for various types of lines and their widths are described. However, practice in respect to
the width of lines varies and therefore reference should be made to individual jurisdictional guidelines.
While many of the general principles described here apply equally in New Zealand, some of the markings differ,
as do meanings assigned to markings used in both Australia and New Zealand. Practitioners in New Zealand
should refer to the Land Transport Rules and to MOTSAM Part 2: Markings (NZ Transport Agency 2010a).
Practitioners should have knowledge of their jurisdiction’s road markings to ensure that use is consistent with
the road rules.
Whilst pavement markings are essential for effective traffic management, practitioners involved in the
management and design of roads need to be aware that they may have the following limitations:
• Markings are subject to traffic wear and require programmed maintenance to ensure their effectiveness.
• They can be partly or wholly ineffective on wet roads at night, or when dust or snow is present.
• Dark and wet conditions can enhance poorly blacked out or erased markings, which can mislead or
confuse drivers. Special care, therefore, needs be taken when removing superfluous markings.
• They can cause skidding problems if materials are not carefully selected or the size of painted areas is
not kept to the minimum.
• The visibility of markings can be greatly affected by crest vertical curves (particularly transverse markings).
• They may be obscured by other vehicles.
• Markings cannot be relied upon to give long-range delineation of the alignment of a road under all
conditions.
• Transverse and word/symbol markings need to be greatly elongated to be seen, read and understood by
drivers and off-line viewing of elongated markings may cause the message to be so distorted as to be illegible.
• They cannot be used on unsealed roads.
Despite these limitations their advantage under favourable conditions is that they convey information to
drivers, often continuously (e.g. as longitudinal lines), without diverting drivers’ attention from the roadway,
and can be used to clearly define the status of certain areas of pavement for road users. A strong visual
contrast between the pavement and the pavement markings is a primary requirement.
6.2.1 Colour
White is used for most Australian and New Zealand road markings and should be used unless otherwise
specified.
Yellow may be used for parking lines either adjacent to the edge of the road to prohibit stopping, or for
special bays (e.g. loading zones) to indicate areas that are not for use by the general motorist. In Victoria
yellow markings are also used in conjunction with road rules to restrict other vehicles from entering tram-only
areas, and from delaying trams on other parts of tram routes. They are also used in Victoria and New South
Wales to improve contrast for longitudinal markings above the snow-line in alpine ski resort areas. On a light-
coloured pavement, black may be used as a background to the white stripes of a broken line to improve the
contrast, although this does not establish black as a standard colour. In New Zealand, yellow is used for no-
passing lines.
The use of other colours for linemarking should not be encouraged as most other colours have inferior
contrast, particularly at night, dusk or dawn. An exception is the use of blue markings for parking facilities for
people with a disability (AS 1742.11) as the benefit of a distinctive colour in discouraging non-compliant use
is considered to be more important than lack of contrast in this low-speed situation.
Where the use of a particular area of pavement needs to be highlighted to address traffic management or
safety issues associated with its special use (e.g. bicycle lanes, bus lanes, pedestrian crossings), the lane or
area may be provided with a surfacing of a standard colour to clearly define its purpose (Section 6.6).
6.2.2 Reflectorisation
All longitudinal lines, diagonal markings and chevrons having application at night must be reflectorised.
Glass beads used in pavement marking materials must comply with AS/NZS 2009.
Raised pavement markers provided for delineation purposes must have retroreflective properties in
accordance with AS/NZ 1906.3.
Water-borne paint is generally used for linemarking and road marking in rural areas. When used,
consideration of the timing of resealing works and traffic volumes should be taken into account, as the use of
long-life materials may prove more economical. Water-borne paint may be favoured as it:
• provides better retention of the larger glass beads, which results in improved night visibility and safety in
wet conditions
• is more environmentally friendly
• is non-flammable and therefore safer to use.
Solvent-borne paint is sometimes used for an initial application on chip seal surfaces as an alternative to
water-borne paint.
Long-life materials are most suitable for use in metropolitan areas or major rural cities on heavily trafficked
routes, unless resurfacing is proposed within three years. Although more expensive than water-borne paint,
long-life material is more cost-effective on these heavily trafficked routes due to its life span being two to five
times longer. The use of these materials for edge lining, as traffic island outlines or approach markings has
the further advantage that the lines can be profiled in a way which provides a tactile and audible warning
when traversed by vehicle tyres. This category includes thermoplastic, cold-applied plastic material, and
pliant polymer tapes.
Specifications for the above materials and for raised pavement markers are generally in conformity with the
relevant Australia Standards, as outlined in Table 6.1.
Table 6.1: Australian Standards which refer to materials for raised pavement markers
Longitudinal lines are used for the purpose of delineating the traffic path and for regulating traffic
movements. They can be classified into the following line types:
• dividing
• barrier
• lane
• transition
• continuity
• edge
• special (e.g. bicycle lane, bus lane, fairway lanes in Victoria).
AS 1742.2 provides information on standard patterns and widths of most of these lines, AS 1742.9 and
AS 1742.12 cover markings for special lanes, and AS 1742.15 covers those relating to motorways. As some
patterns and widths for particular treatments may vary between jurisdictions, local guidelines should be
consulted.
As a general guide, dividing and barrier lines (if overtaking is to be prohibited) are warranted on two-lane
sealed pavements (including bridges) that are 5.5 m or more wide if the annual average daily traffic (AADT)
volume is in excess of:
• 300 vehicles on rural roads
• 2500 vehicles on urban roads.
Irrespective of these volume warrants, continuous or isolated sections of separation or barrier lines may be
desirable where special conditions apply, such as:
• frequent horizontal and/or vertical curves
• sub-standard curves
• areas subject to fog
• approaches to a major road
• sections where the crash record indicates a need
• continuity of marking on an arterial road
• heavy volume of night or tourist traffic
• approaches to pedestrian crossings.
Warrants for the provision of barrier lines and the extent of their provision are covered in AS 1742.2.
Dividing lines are used to separate the portions of the roadway to be used by opposing streams of traffic.
They are usually placed at the centre of two-way carriageways although they may be offset from the centre
depending on directional traffic flows, traffic management (e.g. overtaking lanes) and parking requirements.
Dividing lines are broken, the standard pattern being a 3 m painted stripe and a 9 m gap. This pattern is also
used for part-time bus and transit lanes where the lane is used as a general traffic lane at other times.
However, where the special part-time lane is used for parking or another use at other times, a 9 m stripe and
3 m gap are used.
Barrier lines are a particular form of dividing line described in the Australian Road Rules (ARRs) that prohibit
vehicles from using the opposing traffic lane(s). The most common usage, and the only option available in
New Zealand, is to create no-overtaking zones on two-lane two-way roads where the sight distance ahead is
restricted to the extent that the majority of drivers could not overtake safely. The restriction may apply to one
or both directions of travel. Table 6.2 summarises the legal significance of barrier lines under the ARRs.
In New Zealand, yellow no-passing lines may be marked on two-lane two-way roads where sight distances
are inadequate (primarily vertical curves). Yellow no-passing lines are mandated on three-lane sections of
road without a solid median (e.g. where there is a passing lane in one direction) and are encouraged on four-
lane (or more) roads. The main difference between the New Zealand no-passing line and the Australian
barrier line is that in New Zealand drivers are not precluded from turning across them.
If safe intersection sight distance is not available for drivers entering or leaving the road from a property, it
may be desirable to provide a double two-way barrier line rather than a single barrier line to prohibit crossing
(Austroads 2019c). Note, however, that this is not valid in New Zealand.
Appropriate gaps should be left in double two-way barrier lines where it is necessary for drivers to enter,
leave or cross the road. These gaps should not be provided where such crossing is undesirable, despite the
fact that drivers may wish to cross. If the demand for gaps would destroy the integrity of a barrier line, and
access to adjacent properties is to be permitted, a single continuous barrier line may be substituted.
Where the barrier linemarking does not allow right-turn property access as per the local road rules,
replacement with an alternative barrier line that allows access should be considered.
Where overtaking is to be prohibited, a double two-way barrier line should be used (rather than a single
barrier line on rural roads). They are visually dominant and well understood by drivers who generally have a
sound understanding of their legal obligations for this marking.
Double two-way barrier lines are required where it is necessary to prohibit drivers from driving to the right of
a dividing line in the following cases:
• Where, on account of overtaking sight distance restrictions, a no-overtaking zone is warranted. AS 1742.2
provides detailed information on how to set the limits of double two-way barrier lines on two-lane two-way
roads. The minimum overtaking sight distance (line of sight shown in AS 1742.2) must be based on the
guaranteed visual unobstructed view within the road reserve.
• To mark the dividing line between the overtaking lane and the opposing trafficable lane. If visibility is
sufficient, a double one-way barrier line may be used in some circumstances.
• On the approach to medians, median islands or other central carriageway obstructions at which all traffic
must pass to the left. A single barrier line may be acceptable.
• Outlines and approaches at some painted median islands. Note that the single unbroken lines may be
used in urban situations to enable vehicles to legally pass over the island, thus improving the length for
deceleration, allowing traffic to queue over the painted chevron in peak hours, and enabling access to
property.
• To mark the dividing line on the approaches to traffic signals and stop and give-way controlled
intersections on undivided roads. A single barrier line may be acceptable.
• Approaches to railway level crossings (refer to AS 1742.7). A one-way barrier line is also acceptable.
• Elsewhere where consideration of safety or traffic control requires that all traffic must keep to the left of a
dividing line. The desirable minimum length of the line is given in AS 1742.2.
Double two-way barrier lines must not be used in the following cases:
• for part-time requirements, e.g. on the approach to a school crossing
• on narrow bridges having less than 5.5 m between kerbs or vertical obstructions (AS 1742.2).
A double one-way barrier line is used where it may be appropriate to use a dividing line (allow overtaking) for
one direction of travel, but it is not suitable for use for the other direction.
Where there are access points adjacent to the road, the double one-way barrier line (not allow overtaking)
may be problematic, as it permits driver’s to cross the continuous line on either side to enter or leave the
road unless restricted by local road rules. This may apply where sight distance is not adequate for:
• stationary motorists to select gaps in oncoming traffic and turn into properties adjacent to the road (gap
acceptance sight distance)
• following vehicles to either stop when they identify the presence of the stationary vehicle (stopping sight
distance) or decelerate and pass to the left of the stationary vehicle (manoeuvre sight distance).
If there is not sufficient sight distance to address both of these situations then consideration should be given
to restricting access to left-in, left-out only and install a double two-way barrier line to prohibit vehicles
crossing the centre of the road in order to enter or exit the driveway. Alternatively, if the sight distance is poor
in both directions, consideration should be given to having the driveway relocated.
• Where the demand for gaps in a double line for property access would otherwise destroy the integrity of
the double barrier line.
• To delineate curves, crests and islands on otherwise unmarked narrow residential and collector streets,
where parking is not to be allowed adjacent to the dividing line (due to the ARRs requirement to maintain
3 m clear road width between parked vehicles and the barrier line).
• On the centreline of undivided approaches to traffic signals, or stop, give-way or roundabout holding lines.
Lane lines should be used on all carriageways where sufficient width for two or more lanes of traffic moving
in the one direction is provided. Urban two-way carriageways with a continuous width of 12.5 m (i.e. four-lane
undivided arterial roads) or greater should be lane lined, or may be marked with parking lanes where
appropriate.
If vehicles are permitted to change from one lane to another, the line must be a single broken line in the
appropriate standard pattern. In some circumstances it may be desirable to prohibit lane changing (e.g. close
to an important intersection, or in an auxiliary lane at a two-lane motorway exit) and in these situations lane
lines are usually marked as an unbroken line.
Continuous lane lines 80 to 100 mm wide are used in the following situations:
• approaches to traffic signals, and stop/give-way and roundabout holding lines; the length of these lines
may vary depending on road geometry; however, 20 to 30 m is a desirable length to assist in warning
drivers of the presence of an intersection
• as the line between a through lane and an acceleration, deceleration or a turning lane on roads other than
motorways; a continuity line is used to extend the lane line along the tapers
• to delineate an exclusive bicycle or parking lane
• to define full-time and part-time public transport lanes
• to define turn lanes at traffic signals
• where it is desired to prohibit lane changing while improving lane delineation through sharp curves, over
crests or through other changes in the alignment of lanes.
Continuous lane lines 150 mm wide are used in the following situations:
• to define full-time special purpose lanes such as bus and transit lanes on arterial roads
• on motorways, as the line between the exit ‘trap’ lane and through/optional exit lane, and between the
through lane and the ‘added lane’ on two-lane entry ramps.
It is to be noted that continuous lane lines for bus lanes are only appropriate if lane changing is prohibited;
that is, where vehicles are not permitted to enter the bus lane to turn left, and buses are not permitted to
leave the bus lane.
Where off-centre operation involving reversible flow in the centre lane(s) is implemented, the lane lines may
temporarily operate as separation lines and a bold, broken line pattern or continuous lines may be used to
discourage lane changing. The linemarking at the terminals of these facilities requires special consideration.
‘Transition line’ is a general term given to a specific application of other types of longitudinal lines. It may
apply to those parts of an edge line or island outline that are used to deflect vehicles laterally at points
where:
• the width of the carriageway changes to a greater or lesser number of lanes (except in New Zealand
where it applies to the former case only)
• traffic has to negotiate median traffic islands, safety zones, or obstructions on the road.
Figure 6.1 shows a situation where transition lines are used to guide drivers through a lane reduction, an
alignment involving a lateral shift, and also past a median nose. Transition lines are usually marked as
single, unbroken lines; however, where they are used in advance of a median island separating opposing
directions of traffic flow, a double barrier line may be used. They should extend over the full length of any
constructed transition zone, the length of which will depend to a large extent on prevailing traffic speeds and
the vertical and horizontal alignment of the roadway.
Notes:
The following is a guide to the length of transition lines approaching traffic islands or other obstructions in the
roadway where the length of the constructed width of the transition is not obvious:
L = 0.30 VW for diverging or minor changes
L = 0.50 VW for merging areas
where
However, the minimum length of the transition line should be 60 m in rural areas and 30 m in urban areas.
Transition lines should generally be the same width as edge lines or outline markings depending on the
location. Where traffic volumes are high, or the merge area is on a significant grade, the transition length
may need to be recalculated.
A continuity line is a broken line which may be used to indicate the edge of that portion of a carriageway
assigned to through traffic, and where it is intended that the line be crossed by traffic turning at an
intersection, or entering or leaving an auxiliary lane at its start or finish. The standard pattern is a 1 m line
and a 3 m gap.
Continuity lines are used at a merge associated with lane reductions that require a positive lane change
manoeuvre from the terminating lane to the adjacent lane. Where a general merge manoeuvre is required,
the continuity line is omitted, and drivers are expected to merge in turn in accordance with the road rules. AS
1742.2 sets out the signing and marking requirements for lane reduction and merge situations.
Figure 6.2: Marking of bicycle lane with continuity line through minor intersection
Edge lines provide a continuous guide for drivers by delineating the edge of the travelled way. They are
marked to make driving safer and more comfortable, particularly at night.
Gaps should be left in edge lines at all intersections with minor roads that have no controlled intersection
markings, such as unsealed roads. A standard continuity line may be placed across the gap if delineation is
required, or to continue a bicycle lane through the intersection in accordance with the Australian Road Rules
(ARRs). Where stop or give-way intersection markings are provided, they are not necessarily placed in line
with the edge lines.
Where unsealed shoulders about the pavement, edge lines should be located at a sufficient clearance inside
the pavement edge (e.g. 150 mm to the edge of the line) to ensure that edge wear does not diminish or
destroy the integrity of the line.
A continuous yellow edge line is a regulatory line that can be used to ban parking as an alternative to no
stopping signs in accordance with the ARRs. The relevant road rule applies to yellow edge lines marked
adjacent to kerbs, or at the edge of traffic lanes where it can be used to ban parking on shoulders.
Audio-tactile line marking (ATLM) is generally associated with edge lines as a road-based measure to reduce
fatigue-related crashes by minimising run-off-the-road crashes and therefore primarily used in rural areas.
In general, ATLM is used to provide a noise (audio) and vibratory (tactile) warning to drivers starting to stray
due to fatigue or fog, although another significant benefit is its superior wet weather delineation. Drivers also
tend to focus on the edge line for guidance when traffic is approaching from the opposite direction at night to
avoid being dazzled by headlights.
ATLM is created by installing a line of small projections or depressions in the road surface although
depressions are not recommended for general use. An example of the characteristics of a discontinuous
ATLM is shown in Figure 6.3, while Figure 6.4 shows a treatment on a motorway.
Projections are created by fixing small, raised objects of non-compressible material to the road surface –
most commonly either extruded thermoplastic ribs or plastic raised pavement markers.
Rib Spacing
Rib
Rib Height
Line Width
(Rib Length)
Note: The dimensions of the audio-tactile edge line, including line width, rib spacing, rib height and rib width may vary
between jurisdictions.
Audio-tactile linemarking should be considered where there is a recorded history of fatigue-related crashes
and may be considered on roads prone to fog. Fatigue-prone areas are generally well known to local
authorities, emergency services and jurisdictions, and may be verified by an analysis of a state or territory
crash database. Network road safety audits may also identify potential locations. They are generally within a
particular distance range from city or town centres on long and fairly straight roads. Fatigue-related crashes
predominantly involve single vehicles but not always (e.g. some head-on crashes).
In a review of various studies into the effectiveness of ATLM in reducing crashes, Austroads (2012) found
that the average reduction in casualty crashes as a result of edge lines was approximately 20% and
centrelines was approximately 15%.
It is noted that in Australia and New Zealand ATLM centrelines are not as widely used as edge lines but are
starting to become more widely adopted as a measure to address head-on crashes.
The preferred minimum cross-section width of a sealed roadway for the use of ATLM is 9.0 m comprising two
3.5 m lanes and two 1.0 m sealed shoulders. However, ATLM can be used where the total sealed pavement
width is an absolute minimum of 7.0 m (the edge line should have a clear distance of 150 mm to the edge of
the bitumen) provided that:
• the section of road has a history of fatigue-related road crashes and would benefit from the application of
ATLM
• the shoulder can be maintained in a condition that will guarantee the integrity of the line and savings
associated with crash reductions outweigh the additional cost incurred due to reduced lifespan of the
ATLM.
The minimum continuous length of ATLM that should be applied to a road is one kilometre.
It is desirable that ATLM should not be installed within 500 m of a residential building (where practicable)
with a minimum of 200 m, unless appropriate noise barriers are installed or unless the frequency and
severity of fatigue-related crashes in the area are such that a continuous treatment is considered essential
on safety grounds.
ATLM should be discontinued across locations subject to constant wear from traffic braking and turning.
Typical locations are intersections and access points to commercial developments, service stations and rest
stops.
Special lane lines apply to the provision of transit, bus, truck and bicycle lanes. AS 1742.12 provides
guidance for the marking and treatment of transit, bus and truck lanes, while AS 1742.9 provides information
on bicycle lanes.
Full-time transit, bus and truck lanes are provided with a 100 to 150 mm wide continuous white lane line to
separate the facility from general traffic lanes. Under the ARRs vehicles that are allowed to use the special
lane may move across the lane line. For part-time lanes an 80 to 150 mm wide broken line is used with a:
• 3 m stripe and 9 m gap if the lane is a general traffic lane at other times
• 9 m stripe and 3 m gap if the lane is used for parking or some other special use at other times.
Bicycle lanes are generally separated from general traffic by a 100 mm wide continuous white line. In areas
where bicycles and motor vehicles cross or intersect, continuity lines are used to define the bicycle lane.
Figure 6.5 provides an illustration of a bicycle lane treatment for a road that shows the marking treatment
through an unsignalised intersection, on the approach to a signalised intersection including a ‘head-start’
treatment, and adjacent to angle parking. Further information is provided in Austroads (2019c), AS 1742.9
and relevant jurisdictional guidelines.
Special lane lines may be used to provide full-time or part-time tram lanes, or to restrict motor vehicles from
delaying trams on routes along four-lane undivided roads. Depending on the application, the lines are
continuous or broken yellow lines (AS 1742.12). In Victoria, these lines are referred to as fairway lines.
A stop line is an unbroken line marked transversely across the general traffic lanes and special lanes at
traffic signals, stop signs, and at children’s crossings. The stop line is 300 mm wide; 450 mm is preferred, but
where the 85th percentile speed on the approach is 80 km/h or more the width should be increased to 600
mm. The stop line indicates the point behind which vehicles must stop.
Where stop or give-way line markings are provided at an unsignalised intersection in conjunction with stop or
give-way signs, the line is continued as a broken line across the right-hand side of the carriageway. The
broken line is always narrower than the line on the left-hand side of the carriageway. The dimensions of the
broken section of the stop line are a 150 mm wide line comprising 600 mm long segments with 600 mm
gaps. The treatment of stop lines and give-way lines at kerbed intersection is shown in Figure 6.6. Where it is
necessary to locate the stop line in advance of the intersecting carriageway because of visibility restrictions,
the needs of pedestrians, or clearance to stopped vehicles for traffic turning at the intersecting roadway, the
broken line is continued across the road.
The treatment of give-way lines at intersections on roads that are unkerbed and have shoulders is illustrated
in Figure 6.7.
Stop lines are also provided for bicycle lanes. Where no head-start area is provided, the normal stop line
provided for motor vehicles needs to extend across the bicycle lane. Typical arrangements for setting out a
stop line as part of a head-start area are discussed further in Austroads (2019c) and AS 1742.9.
Stop lines should generally be at right angles to the road centreline on the approach. At highly skewed
intersections it may be appropriate to stagger the stop lines in each traffic lane. At railway level crossings
stop lines may be painted parallel to the rail tracks (AS 1742.7).
A give-way line is at least 300 mm wide consisting of line segments 600 mm long separated by 600 mm gaps
marked across an intersection approach controlled by a give-way or roundabout sign.
Give-way lines indicate the safe position at which a stationary vehicle giving right of way should stand. It is
continued across the right-hand side of the carriageway at half the width of the line used across the
approach lanes. Where it is necessary to locate the holding line in advance of the through carriageway
because of the needs of pedestrians or clearance from traffic, the broken line is continued across the road.
The treatment of holding lines at intersections that have kerbs is illustrated in Figure 6.6 whereas the
treatment at unkerbed intersections is shown in Figure 6.7 (also refer to AS 1742.2).
A holding line may also be used at railway level crossings that are controlled by a give-way sign and
crossings that have no regulatory control devices to indicate the safe position for a vehicle to stop.
In New Zealand, single continuous transverse lines, known as ‘limit lines’ are used for stop and give-way
signs, roundabouts, railway level crossings and in advance of pedestrian crossings. Where stop signs are
installed (intersections and railway level crossings) the pavement markings are yellow.
Figure 6.6: Typical stop line and give-way line treatments at kerbed intersections
Long openings may require pavement delineation, especially if on a curve or crest. Use standard continuity lines on
the prolongation of each median kerb in such cases.
The leading edge of the broken give-way line at a median opening (i.e. edge nearer the major road) is aligned with
the face of kerb. An exception to this is where a painted edge line is installed along the median; in such cases the
markings at median openings are a prolongation of the edge line.
A side road centreline is provided if the remainder of the side street has a separation line marked, or if the width
between kerbs, or seal width measured 10 m back from stop/holding line, is 6 m or more. The line may be extended
beyond 30 m if the approach is curved, or on a crest, or if there is some other unusual geometric feature. However,
where less than 3 m clear distance will result between the line and a parked car, parking is illegal under the ARRs
and this should be considered in the arrangement adopted.
There must be sufficient clearance for opposing right turners to pass when simultaneously following a diamond turn
pattern.
The central line in the median opening is an unbroken line, preferably 150 mm in width.
Apply relevant road agency guidelines.
Median treatment as in Examples a, b or c as appropriate.
Approach island or median nose set back. A 100 mm wide outline between end of stop/holding line and
island/median nose may be marked to enhance delineation.
Controlled intersection markings are a prolongation of the painted island outline.
Where an edge line is provided, it may continue around the corner to the stop or give-way marking.
An edge line may or may not be marked adjacent to an unsealed shoulder.
At crossroads where right turns are made in the direction of the arrow, distance ‘A’ should be at least 6 m to permit a
through vehicle to pass a right turning vehicle without risk of colliding with a vehicle waiting at the holding line. In the
case of a T-intersection, adopt 5 m (This note applies only where pavement is unkerbed).
The holding line should be set back sufficiently to achieve a balance between clearance to the major road traffic lane,
sight distance, and the crossing distance for vehicles leaving the side road. Some jurisdictions have specific
requirements regarding the position of the holding line.
A median may exist in this situation.
Note: These arrangements are applicable where there is no central island on the minor road, and also apply to T-
junctions.
Under the ARRs, markings to assist pedestrians to cross the road are defined as a ‘marked foot crossing’, a
‘pedestrian crossing’ or a ‘children’s crossing’. Details of these are outlined below with further details in
Austroads (2017a) and Austroads (2008–17).
Marked foot crossings (Figure 6.8) are provided at traffic signals and are defined by two parallel broken lines
on the road surface extending from one side of the road to the other. They may be provided at intersection
signals or at mid-block pedestrian operated signals. The lines across the road are generally placed in the
order of 2.4 m apart, but no less than 2 m, are 150 to 300 mm in width, with 1 m line segments and 300 mm
gaps.
Pedestrian (zebra) crossings (Figure 6.9) consist of a series of longitudinal bars 600 mm wide and generally
not less than 3.5 m long. The bars are placed parallel to the road centreline with gaps of 600 mm. The
crossing is usually at right angles to the road centreline, but it may be angled (at a suggested maximum
angle of 30° to a perpendicular line to the kerb) where local circumstances require.
Children’s crossing markings (Figure 6.10) consist of a pair of parallel broken lines (1 m line segments and
300 mm gaps) 150 mm wide across the road. The crossings are also defined by flags, signs, posts or
flashing lights depending on the type, and stop lines in advance of the crossing lines. A substantial distance
(e.g. 6 m) is usually provided between the crossing lines and the associated stop lines to provide greater
clearance between stopping vehicles and young pedestrians.
Figure 6.10: Example of children’s crossing line markings – this one accompanied by post and flag
Broken (as opposed to solid) turn lines of 100 mm thickness and 600 mm stripe with 600 mm gaps may be
used within a signalised intersection, particularly in complex intersections, to guide traffic along the most
desirable turning path. Further guidance on the use of turn lines at intersections is outlined in Section 8.7.1.
They are predominantly used for right-turning movements and normally required when one or more of the
following conditions apply:
• undivided approaches on opposite sides of an intersection have separation lines offset by more than 3 m
• the intersection is on a summit vertical curve and right-turning drivers could be unsure of the required
travel path through the intersection
• the right-turn movement is from two or three lanes turning in the same direction
In some instances, where multiple left-turn lanes exist (e.g. where a motorway off-ramp joins a divided
arterial road) turning lines may be required to assist vehicles turning three or four abreast.
At cross intersections, clearance to meet the swept path requirements must be provided for opposing
right-turn vehicles. When a driver of a right-turning vehicle filtering through an intersection has difficulty in
determining where to stop, which may be due to the curvature of the road and/or vehicles making a right turn
from the opposite direction, a 300 mm wide holding line may be marked to indicate where to wait prior to
completing the turn. An example of the use of turn lines is shown in Figure 6.11.
Wide diagonal or chevron markings may be applied to areas of pavement that are not intended for use by
moving vehicles, for example, painted islands and medians, the approaches to islands or obstructions, and in
emergency stopping lanes to discourage use by through traffic. Details of the markings are covered in
AS 1742.2.
In New Zealand, flush medians and approaches to right-turn bays (which utilise diagonal markings) may be
used by turning vehicles.
Dividing lines and barrier lines on shared paths or bicycle paths should be marked in accordance with
AS 1742.9.
Yellow box markings have been trialled at signalised intersections in Melbourne and Sydney and more
recently have just commenced being trialled in Perth.
Yellow box markings are used to delineate locations on the road where motorists should not stop at any time
but particularly during congested conditions such as:
• in the middle of intersections
• at mid-block locations which provide access to critical locations (for example, at fire stations or
ambulance access to and from hospital grounds), although some jurisdictions may prefer to use ‘keep
clear’ pavement markings (refer to Section 8.7.4)
• at railway level crossings.
It is important when considering yellow box markings that their effectiveness is enhanced with education and
enforcement accompanying their use.
As vehicles being trapped in a queue on a railway level crossing can have disastrous consequences,
delineation of the conflict area between trains and vehicles using the yellow box marking can assist drivers to
stop their vehicles clear of the tracks. This encourages a reduction in the number of vehicles stopping on the
railway tracks and therefore reduces the number of vehicles at risk. Their use at railway level crossings is
covered in AS 1742.7.
It is recommended that yellow box markings should only be installed at railway level crossings where:
• Traffic queues extend across the rail tracks on a regular basis as a result of a downstream constraint (e.g.
a signalised intersection). The constraint should be subject to an engineering assessment to determine if
it can be removed or improved to reduce or eliminate the queuing.
• An engineering evaluation of the site has been carried out to maximise the effectiveness of such
markings (e.g. the downstream limits of the markings should be visible to the driver of a passenger
vehicle at the stop line of the rail crossing).
Use of the yellow box markings for situations other than railway level crossings, such as those noted earlier,
is at the discretion of the road agency.
Words, numerals, and symbols may be marked on pavements in accordance with AS 1742.2 to provide
guidance, warning, or regulatory messages to drivers. For example, the words keep clear are often used as
an alternative to yellow box markings (Section 6.5.4).
They should be elongated in the direction of traffic movement so that they may be legible at the maximum
distance. Legibility distance is increased by enlarging the length of characters. There is, however, a
diminishing rate of benefit obtainable with increasing length.
Where traffic travels at minimum headways a pavement message should be limited, where practicable, to
one line. On high-speed roads a separation of four times the character height should be used, and the
message should be arranged so as to read sequentially (i.e. with the first word nearest to the driver).
For low-speed urban situations the separation between lines may be from one-half to one times the
character height, in which case the message should be arranged to read from top to bottom (i.e. with the first
word farthest from the driver).
Permissible word messages and dimensions of letters and numerals used on the road pavement are
specified in AS 1742.2.
Arrows
Arrows are used where necessary to ensure correct lane usage at approaches to intersections and other
control points. Arrows should be used in preference to words to designate turning lanes. Pavement arrows
are elongated similar to letters or numerals in order to increase their recognition distance (AS 1742.2).
If any lane on the approach to an intersection is to be designated by means of arrows, where practicable at
least three arrows should be placed in that lane to increase the probability of recognition. A spacing of 15 to
30 m should be used between repeater arrows according to the size of the arrow, larger arrows being used
for high-speed roads.
At intersections where queues of vehicles are likely to occur (e.g. at traffic signals) pavement arrows should
commence a sufficient distance in advance of the intersection to ensure that waiting vehicles do not obscure
the arrows, wherever this is practicable.
The permissible combinations of pavement arrows and their design details are shown in AS 1742.2.
Pavement markings are used in business areas to designate sections of road for use as public parking
spaces, bus stops, loading zones, and taxi stands. Markings may also be used to indicate no-standing and
parking restrictions.
AS 1742.11 provides information on road markings associated with parking and parking restrictions, and
Austroads (2017b) covers typical dimensions and layouts for parking spaces.
Pavement markings at, and on the approach to roundabouts are provided to guide and control drivers (and
when appropriate, bicyclists) through the intersection. Austroads (2019c), MOTSAM Part 2 and AS 1742.2
provide guidance on the provision of markings related to roundabouts.
Kerbs of medians and traffic islands may be painted and reflectorised if added visibility is required.
Reflectorised markers may also be used on kerbs as they may be more durable than paint.
Zig-zag road markings may be used in some jurisdictions in order to increase driver awareness of an
approaching feature such as a pedestrian (zebra) crossing and school zones (e.g. acts as a gateway
feature). The markings should only be used selectively where sight distance may be poor and where features
such as pedestrian crossings are unable to be relocated.
As the use of the markings and their design differs between road agencies, practitioners should refer to
jurisdictional guidelines before implementation to conform if their use is permitted and to also confirm the
layout of the zig-zag pattern. An example of a zig-zag marking used on the approach to a pedestrian
crossing is shown in Figure 6.12.
Figure 6.12: Example of zig-zag road marking on the approach to a pedestrian (zebra) crossing
7m
1.2m
Zig-zag (150mm wide) to be placed centrally in lane
Double barrier line
Max 10 x 7m, Min 7 x 7m Max 45m
Min 30m
20m
No Stopping Area
Source: AS 2700.
In New Zealand, bus lanes are green and cycle lanes are also generally green, although one local authority
uses red.
Although AS 1742.12 recommends the use of particular pavement marking to designate part-time and full-time
special lanes, some road agencies are choosing to provide coloured surfacing throughout the entire area of
some bus and bicycle lanes in order to provide enhanced recognition by motorists and to improve compliance.
The use of green surfacing for bicycle lanes by some agencies may be limited to areas where bicyclists
experience considerable stress, such as:
• areas where the paths of motor vehicles and bicycles cross or weave, typically on the approaches and
departures of intersections at the tapers to left-turn lanes and added lanes (diverge and merge areas)
• within particularly complex intersections, or very wide intersections, where enhanced delineation of the
bicycle lane is essential.
Austroads (2011) noted that the provision of coloured cycle lanes of good width leading from the transition to
the advanced limit lines of signalised intersections improves bicyclist perceptions of safety to a greater extent
than the improvement in actual crash risk. As such facilities improve bicyclists’ perceptions, their use
encourages more to ride.
Yellow pavement material may be used where it is desirable to reinforce pedestrian priority and encourage
drivers to give way to pedestrians by highlighting pedestrian areas such as marked foot crossings at
pedestrian operated signals. If the road surface is coloured yellow there would be poor colour contrast with
any pedestrian (zebra) markings, so yellow pavement colouring should not be used in such cases.
6.7.1 Types
Raised pavement markers are used to augment marked lines on the road surface. The most common types
of raised pavement markers are:
• raised retroreflective pavement markers (RRPMs)
• non-retroreflective pavement markers (NRPMs).
AS 1742.2 provides details of patterns to be used for placement of markers on the road surface.
RRPMs and NRPMs are generally constructed of plastic in the form of domes approximately 100 mm in
diameter or trapezoidal prisms about 100 mm wide. RRPMs contain a retroreflector that provides delineation
under vehicle headlights at night, whereas NRPMs are used in situations where night-time delineation is not
necessary or could cause confusion.
RRPMs and NRPMs used on roads must comply with the requirements of AS/NZ 1906.3.
RRPMs are used to augment painted lines, stripes and chevrons when it is necessary to improve their visual
properties. They are intended to be trafficable when placed within a painted island or median strip. They are
not obscured at night under wet conditions as the retroreflective panels sit above the surface and are more
prominent than reflectorised painted markings. In addition, they provide an audible and tactile signal when
traversed by vehicle wheels.
Generally, where they augment painted lines, reflective markers are used to ensure adequate alignment and
lane delineation at night and during inclement weather. RRPMs are used in various colours as follows, in
accordance with AS 1742.2:
• white is used to augment lane lines and markings at painted traffic islands
• yellow is used to augment dividing lines (including barrier lines) and, where appropriate, markings at
painted traffic islands, and on the right-hand edge lines of one-way carriageways
• red is used where appropriate to augment left-hand edge lines of two-way and one-way carriageways
• blue is used in some jurisdictions to mark the location of fire hydrants; a single marker is placed near the
road centreline opposite the position of the hydrant
• in some jurisdictions green is used on left edge lines at motorway exits, and to mark culverts or drains in
New Zealand.
RRPMs can be either one-way or two-way markers, meaning that they are retroreflective for either only one
direction of approach, or for both directions. One-way markers are therefore used to delineate lane lines and
traffic islands and two-way markers are used for dividing and barrier lines.
RRPMs are used to delineate all types of longitudinal lines, including the outlines of traffic islands.
Where used, NRPMs should always be white. Their use should normally be restricted to the definition of
traffic lanes across signalised intersections where the travel lane through the intersection would otherwise be
poorly defined because:
• the intersection is wide or highly skewed
• the through lanes change direction within the intersection area
• lanes on opposite sides of the intersection are offset by half a lane width or greater
• drivers are required to steer a curved course through the intersection, particularly where tangent points
are close to the intersection.
The placement of NRPMs within an intersection to guide non-turning traffic should be considered where it is
apparent that such traffic would have difficulty in finding the correct lane on the departure side. The treatment
should only be considered for wide signalised intersections on multi-lane roads. They may be considered for
unsignalised intersections in special cases.
The application of NRPMs is also illustrated in AS 1742.2. Where applied, the treatment is completed for all
through lanes on all legs, even if the problem only exists for a proportion of the intersection, or one
intersecting road only. Markers are generally not positioned within the area bounded by turning lanes, unless
confusing or inaccurate guidance would result (e.g. where a curved path is to be followed). Regular
maintenance of NRPMs will reduce the possibility of confusing patterns occurring due to an excessive
number of missing markers.
NRPMs may also be used in off-road parking areas to outline parking spaces (Austroads 2017b).
Requirements for the provision of raised pavement markers may vary between jurisdictions and be based on
the function of the road, traffic volumes and other specific considerations. As a guide, they may be used to
augment painted separation and barrier markings on:
• rural roads when AADT exceeds 1000
• urban roads when AADT exceeds 10 000
• on multi-lane roads.
In addition, consideration in the provision of raised pavement markers should be given to:
• roads that have a crash problem that could be addressed through improved delineation (e.g. run-off-road
crashes)
• areas subject to poor environmental conditions such as excessive rain or fog
• roads that are poorly lit
• locations that have sharp curves (horizontal or vertical) that may not be expected by approaching drivers
• roads that have special requirements (e.g. remote areas, high percentage of heavy vehicles).
AS 1742.2 provides guidance on the spacing between markers to be used for dividing, barrier and lane lines,
and for the outline of traffic islands.
Internally illuminated pavement markers (IIPMs) are self-illuminating pavement markers which may be used
in some jurisdictions as an alternative device to RRPMs.
The light source is commonly a high intensity LED (light emitting diode) display with various proprietary
products being based on solar power, induced power or a hard-wired power supply. As they are used as an
alternative to RRPMs, they should operate in a steading state when in operation (i.e. not operate in flashing
mode).
Their use as an alternative should only be considered after an engineering assessment, and only after a
conclusion is reached that linemarking to an appropriate standard and RRPMs would not provide the
required delineation. As part of any engineering assessment, consideration should be given to ongoing
maintenance issues, including replacement due to vandalism or theft.
When used, IIPMs are to be in accordance with the requirements for RRPMs, including colour and
configuration requirements (as outlined in Section 6.7.3). Besides providing an alternative to RRPMs, IIPMs
may also potentially be used to provide delineation on a part-time basis, for example delineation of merge
tapers at the commencement of part-time lanes and as lane controls such as contra-flow and tidal-flow
treatments to supplement overhead signals. However, any such use should be subject to an engineering
assessment and subject to permitted jurisdictional practice. Therefore, practitioners should refer to
jurisdictional guidelines when considering their use.
Various products are available that will respond or self-activate in response to environmental or other
predetermined conditions such as:
• Failing light: illuminates when ambient light levels fall below a pre-set level.
• Moisture: various products are available that illuminate whenever fog, rain or mist is present.
• Ice: illuminates at temperatures low enough to allow the formation of ice on the road surface.
IIPMs are available as either surface-mounted models (similar to NRPM), RRPMs, or flush (inset) mounted.
With respect to their ongoing operation it is noted that solar-powered markers have the advantage that costly
wiring is not necessary, but to be effective they must also be robust enough to withstand normal traffic and
the novelty of them may lead to sites being vandalised. Induced power may be delivered to markers via a
cable placed in a saw cut along the line of the markers. As there are no direct connections, damaged
markers can be replaced without maintenance being required for power connection. Hard-wired systems are
usually very robust but require the provision and maintenance of direct electrical connections to each marker.
They have the advantage that a communication link can be made available between markers enabling
various effects to be implemented at the discretion of the road agency.
Retroreflective markers generally comprise a strong plastic shell housing a retroreflector. RRPMs are available
in other robust materials and designs that may not be able to be tested under AS/NZ 1906.3. The performance
and suitability of such devices should be determined through tests and/or field studies. One example is a glass
dome type RRPM that reflects light from all directions. These devices have an advantage in situations where it
may be difficult to orientate other approved devices for satisfactory performance (e.g. on very sharp curves,
around the periphery of the central island of a roundabout). Such devices may be relatively expensive and may
only be suitable where they can be embedded into the road surface (i.e. asphalt or concrete). A similar product
is available that is designed to be embedded into the face of concrete kerbs.
The first four types of strip entail a pattern or cluster of parallel bars or grooves spaced relatively close to one
another and oriented in a transverse direction across the carriageway. The first, second and fifth types are
reported to be the most commonly used in practice. The last two are commonly used in Australia for
longitudinal delineation (to delineate lanes or the edge of the road).
Rumble strips formed from grooves in hot asphalt, or by grinding grooves in existing pavement, are generally
not favoured as they lead to soil and debris being collected in the grooves causing a reduction in tactile
performance. This treatment is therefore not recommended for general use and is not suitable for thin stone
chip seals.
Austroads (2012) reviewed studies into the effectiveness of rumble strips. Five studies identified crash
reductions with the installation of transverse rumble strips. In addition, many studies concentrated on speed
reduction associated with this treatment. The conclusion from the review was that the studies demonstrated,
at a low confidence level, an average crash reduction of 25%.
Rumble strips are not recommended for extensive use throughout the road network. In light of the research
and potential adverse effects:
• They should only be used as an alerting device to address a road safety problem where other
conventional measures such as signing and road markings have proven to be ineffective, and the site is
unlikely to attract funding for a permanent solution (e.g. changes to geometric layout) in the foreseeable
future.
• They should not be used as a traffic management device for the control of speeds.
It is recommended that installations of rumble strips should be accompanied by signing to convey the nature
of the potential hazard, and hence communicate the reason for the installation to drivers.
Austroads (2014a) identified the use of traverse rumble strips on the approach to curves, rural intersections
and level crossings as one method of reducing speed on rural roads. Some of the implementation issues
associated with their use include:
• Rumble strips are noisy and should not be used near residential areas (e.g. not within 150 m of
residential areas). However, if driven over at higher speeds the noise and vibratory effects are less
severe. It is noted that resin-based treatments may be acceptable for use in low-speed local streets
abutting residential property, especially where a crash problem (e.g. sharp curve) is being addressed.
• They need to be placed so that the driver has enough time to slow down before the curve, intersection
and/or level crossing.
• Signs are also required to indicate the reason(s) to slow down.
• There are maintenance issues.
• There may be issues with skid resistance (particularly for motorcyclists).
• There has been evidence of driving on the wrong side of the road in order to avoid the rumble strips
placed on the approach-side only.
As traverse rumble strips can be installed in various formations with no current harmonisation across
Australia and New Zealand, further guidance on their implementation is not provided in the Guide.
Commentary 3 presents some guidance on implementation based on Department of Transport and Main
Roads (2015).
[see Commentary 3]
AS 1428.4 provides guidance for the provision of TGSIs as part of traffic management treatments.
In New Zealand, practitioners should refer to NZ Transport Agency (2015) for guidance on facilities for blind
and vision-impaired pedestrians.
Perceptual countermeasures are treatments which are used to alter a driver’s perception of speed, or of the
road environment (e.g. making the road appear narrower, or to make a curve appear more severe). The aim
is that by altering the perception of the speed, the driver will slow down to match the perceived conditions.
The use of these markings is being explored for by road agencies with some providing their own advice and
guidelines. Practitioners should therefore refer to road agencies for guidance.
Dragon teeth Dragon’s teeth are a painted series of As used by Roads and Maritime Services at school zones
triangular road markings placed in
pairs on each side of a lane or road.
In Roads and Maritime Services they
are being used to further increase the
visibility of school zones for motorists
and provide a constant reinforcement
to slow down to 40 km/h around
schools as shown in the adjacent
image.
In VicRoads they are being trialled to
create the perception of the road Source: Roads and Maritime Services (2015).
narrowing, through increasing the As trialled by VicRoads to address a safety issue along a
size of the dragon teeth, and section of road with a significant crash history
therefore encouraging drivers to slow
down. VicRoads is trialling their use
along a section of road that has a
significant crash history.
Guide posts with reflectorised delineators are placed in series in pairs on both sides of the road formation to
indicate to road users the alignment of the roadway ahead, especially at horizontal and vertical curves.
Properly installed and maintained retroreflective delineators provide effective long-range delineation for night
driving and can be an advantage in fog prone areas. Guide posts with delineators may also be used to alert
drivers approaching an intersection. Retroreflective delineators are generally mounted on white posts, with
red delineators used on the left side of the carriageway and white delineators on the right. AS 1742.2
provides standards for the provision and installation of guide posts.
Details of the type, placement and fixing of delineators may vary across jurisdictions. Guide posts should be
constructed so that when struck by a vehicle, they do not constitute a safety hazard.
A number of different post types are currently in use including rigid and flexible types which may be
constructed of materials such as timber, plastic, rubber and sheet steel. However, in line with Safe System
principles, current best practice is to use flexible, lightweight, plastic guide posts that flex when hit. Use of
such flexible guide posts significantly reduces the risk of the post becoming a hazardous projectile if struck
by a vehicle.
To maintain visual uniformity, the type of guide post and delineator, and the lateral and longitudinal
placement should be consistent along road sections. The delineator type should also be consistent over a
minimum length of road (e.g. 2 km). More detail is provided in Section 7.3.
Wherever practicable, guide posts should be placed at a uniform distance from the pavement edge. On
unkerbed roads, they should be erected at the outside edge of the shoulder of the roadway. For kerbed
carriageways, they should desirably be set back 1 m from the face of the kerb.
7.3 Delineators
Delineators are small retroreflectors or panels of retroreflective material which may be used separately or be
attached to guide posts or safety barriers as effective aids for night driving. AS/NZS 1906.2 specifies the
standard required for delineators for aspects such as photometric properties (e.g. retroreflectivity), physical
integrity and durability.
While Figure 7.1 depicts a circular reflector as the delineator, rectangular strips of retroreflective material are
primarily being used for new installations. Delineators made up of vinyl retroreflective sheeting are less
susceptible to impact damage when the guide post is hit, and are therefore recommended for use on flexible
posts. Further, use of retroreflective vinyl sheeting pose less risk of delineators being dislodged and
becoming missiles in the event of the guide post being struck.
Snow poles are a special form of guide post used to mark the edge of the road formation when hidden by
snow, for the benefit of both normal traffic and snow-clearing plant. Details for their design and installation
are provided in AS 1742.2.
8. Traffic Signals
Traffic signals are the most common form of traffic control at major intersections on urban road networks.
They may be situated at an isolated site, or be part of a complex system of signal coordination.
While intersection signals have generally been found to improve the safety performance of intersections,
they are not generally accepted as a Safe System treatment (Austroads, 2015h). For most movements at an
intersection, the installation of traffic signals changes the task for road users from gap acceptance to signal
compliance. The latter is less prone to error and the workload and skills required to negotiate a signalised
intersection are less than those at an equivalent unsignalised, stop or give way controlled intersection.
Hence, intersection signals contribute to safer roads and safer road users. However, signalised intersections
are not typically forgiving when road user error results in a crash. The most common FSI crashes at
signalised intersections are opposing turning (right turn against), adjacent directions (side impact),
pedestrian and same direction (rear end and side swipes) (Austroads, 2017a). Austroads (2015h and 2019c)
present a number of treatments and alternative designs aimed at improving the alignment of signalised
intersections with Safe System objectives.
This section provides details of signal displays, signal face layouts, display sequences, location of signals
and associated road signs and markings. Austroads (2019c) provides guidance on traffic management
aspects of signalised intersections while the broader operation of traffic signal systems is covered in
Austroads (2019d).
In designing a new or remodelled traffic signal installation, care should be taken to ensure that new signs
and markings associated with the signals are consistent with all existing traffic control devices on all
approaches to the intersection.
Signal faces are made up of a number of signal aspects, generally in one or two columns. Their nature is
described in AS 1742.14. The design and recommended sizes of signal aspects, including shapes of
symbols, are given in AS 2144.
Vehicle aspects must be red, yellow or green. Pedestrian aspects must be red or green. Bicycle aspects for
two-aspect lanterns must be red or green, and for three-aspect lanterns must be red, yellow or green.
Special vehicle aspects for trams, buses or emergency vehicles must be white.
Signal aspects currently in use are illustrated in Figure 8.1 but they are not used in all jurisdictions.
Circular aspects (disks) are used as a first preference. They are the easiest to comprehend and have the
greatest visual range.
Circular aspects control all traffic approaching or waiting at the stop line associated with the aspects if they
are the only ones in the signal face. At an intersection, a circular green display permits left-turning and
right-turning traffic to filter (accept gaps in a pedestrian movement or oncoming traffic) unless prohibited by
other controls.
Arrow aspects are used to control particular movements at traffic signal installations including U-turn
movements as shown in Figure 8.1. Arrow aspect orientations to be used are shown in Figure 8.2.
Directional arrow displays supplement or cancel the intent of any circular displays with which they are
associated. Although not commonly used due to the emergence of LED displays, arrows can be displayed by
means of masks obscuring part of the lens. Where masks are used so that the greater part of the lens is
obscured, the visual range of the lantern is reduced. For this reason, straight-through arrows (used to control
the faster movements) should preferably not be used in red or yellow aspects; they should only be used in
green aspects when absolutely necessary.
Where all traffic on an approach must turn left (and/or right), and there is no conflict with a pedestrian or
other traffic movement, extra guidance may be given by replacing green circular aspects with arrows.
Downward pointing arrow aspects should not be used with intersection control signals. Their use is confined
to overhead lane control signals.
The don’t walk aspect is a red standing human figure, and the walk aspect is a green walking figure as
shown in Figure 8.1.
Where regulations permit, bicycle aspects can be used in a similar way to those for pedestrian aspects to
control bicyclists crossing the road, or in a similar way to vehicle aspects to control on-road bicyclists at an
intersection. The symbol for bicycle aspects is shown in Figure 8.1.
Two aspects, red and green, are used for road crossings (except in New Zealand). Three aspects – red,
yellow and green – are used at road intersections with exclusive bicycle lanes, or at intersections of a road
and exclusive bicycle path.
Special vehicle aspects are used to control bus, tram and emergency vehicle movements at traffic signals as
regulations permit. The symbols for special vehicle aspects are shown in Figure 8.1.
The white T or B, and in some jurisdictions, the E aspects are used to indicate that trams, buses or
emergency vehicles may proceed.
White arrows are also used occasionally to indicate that drivers of special vehicles may proceed in the
direction of the arrow.
Pedestrian aspects must not be combined with vehicle aspects in the same signal face. Circular and arrow
aspects may be combined as detailed later in the section. Circular or arrow aspects can also be combined
with special vehicle aspects. Some jurisdictions are trialling a combination of bicycle and pedestrian aspects.
This section discusses general requirements for vehicle signal face layouts. Sections 8.2.2 and 8.2.3 discuss
signal face layouts with right-turn and left-turn arrow aspects. The sequence of vehicle signal displays is
discussed in Section 8.3.
Aspects are arranged in columns with the red aspect upper-most, the yellow aspect central and the green
aspect at the bottom. The basic three-aspect signal face consists of red, yellow and green circular aspects in
a single column as shown in Figure 8.3. This is the normal minimum permissible signal face layout. In special
traffic situations, two-aspect signal faces may be used. Single-aspect signals are not permitted (except for
overhead lane control signals).
Multi-column signal faces can contain four, five, or six aspects. Generally, these face layouts have an arrow
aspect column adjacent to the basic three-aspect column. Six-aspect face layouts, as shown in Figure 8.4,
are used to control left-turn or right-turn movements independently of the through movement on the same
approach.
In addition to the above and except in the case of a four-aspect single column display as detailed below:
• aspects of the same colour are located on the same horizontal level
• no column contains more than three aspects
• only one aspect of each colour is permitted in each column
• at one time not more than one aspect is illuminated in each column.
The use of three columns in a display is not recommended as they are difficult to comprehend and are not
catered for in standard mountings. Therefore, where possible, they should be split into separate two-column
displays mounted on different posts or mast arms.
A single column of four aspects can be used consisting of red and yellow circular aspects and two green
aspects (circular and arrow, or two arrows) as shown in Figure 8.5. This is not permitted for
overhead-mounted signals. Four-aspect columns should not be used in multi-column displays.
Where regulations permit, two-aspect signal face layouts (Figure 8.6) are used in the following
circumstances (also see ramp metering signals in Section 8.6, and metering signals at sign-controlled
intersections in Section 8.5.7):
• As roundabout metering signals (Section 8.5.6), or at signalised crossings near a roundabout entry,
comprising red and yellow circular aspects (Figure 8.6(a)). In this case, a green circle is not used in order
to avoid conflict with the requirement to give way at the roundabout.
• To stop traffic at a signalised crossing on a left-turn slip lane where traffic may continue to filter after the
pedestrian phase has finished, comprising red and yellow circular or arrow aspects (Figure 8.6(b)). In this
case, a green circle or green arrow is not used in order to avoid conflict with the requirement to give way
to other traffic at the slip lane give-way line.
• As yellow and green arrow aspects on the far-right side of a divided road (dual secondary signal as
shown in Figure 8.6(b)) to reassure right-turn traffic in a wide intersection that it may proceed (Figure
8.6(c)).
• As ‘split tertiary’ signals comprising yellow and green arrows, which are used where the road that left
turners are turning into has a median or island (Figure 8.6(d)) (refer to Section 8.4.3).
(a) Roundabout metering or (b) Slip lane with signalised (c) Dual secondary (d) Split tertiary signals
signalised crossing near crossing signals for wide for wide
a roundabout entry intersections intersections
A six-aspect signal face layout with red, yellow and green arrow aspects can be used to independently
control right-turn movements (Figure 8.4).
The green right-turn arrow should be displayed only when no conflicting traffic movements (vehicle or
pedestrian) are permitted.
The yellow right-turn arrow is always displayed following the green arrow display.
The red right-turn arrow should be displayed following the yellow arrow display when the right-turn
movement or a conflicting movement (vehicle or pedestrian) must be protected. Vehicle movements include
special vehicles such as tram, bus, or train.
Full signal control simplifies the decision making process for drivers turning right as they are not required to
find a suitable gap in the opposing traffic stream and do not have to give way to pedestrians crossing the
road into which they are entering. This method of control is considered to provide moderate to high alignment
with the Safe System for right turns at signalised intersections (Austroads, 2017a). Full control of right turns
is therefore preferred ahead of phasing options that permit filtering.
A five-aspect signal face layout with yellow and green arrow aspects (Figure 8.7) may be used in lieu of a
six-aspect face layout when:
• the right-turn movement may filter at all times when the circular aspect is green (hence no need for red
arrow)
• there is no conflicting pedestrian movement or special movement which requires protection from the right-
turning vehicle.
A five-aspect signal layout with yellow and red arrow aspects (Figure 8.8) is rarely needed (and is not
permitted in some jurisdictions). It may be used to terminate a right-turn filter movement during the circular
green display to avoid blockage of the intersection during a nearby tram, bus or train movement.
Figure 8.7: Five-aspect signal face layout with Figure 8.8: Five-aspect signal face layout with red
yellow and green right-turn arrow and yellow right-turn aspects
aspects
A four-aspect signal layout with single green arrow aspect (Figure 8.9) may be used only when the right-turn
green arrow display is always terminated simultaneously with the circular green display, i.e. when the circular
yellow display is introduced.
A four-aspect signal layout with single red arrow aspect (Figure 8.10) may be used only when its use is
restricted to the sequence discussed in Section 8.3.3.
This signal face layout is used infrequently. It may be used to delay a filter right-turn movement for the
protection of pedestrians or special vehicles.
Figure 8.9: Four-aspect signal face layouts with single Figure 8.10: Four-aspect signal face layout with
right-turn green arrow aspect single right-turn red arrow aspect
or
A six-aspect signal face layout with red, yellow and green arrow aspects can be used to independently
control left-turn movements (Figure 8.4).
The green left-turn arrow should be displayed only when no conflicting traffic movements (vehicle or
pedestrian) are permitted.
The red left-turn arrow should be displayed following the yellow arrow display when the left-turn movement or
a conflicting movement (vehicle or pedestrian) must be protected. Vehicle movements include special
vehicles such as tram, bus, or train.
The column of left-turn aspects should be blacked out when the left-turn movement may filter through a
parallel walk or other traffic movement (i.e. when only the circular green is displayed).
When it is not required to protect conflicting movements during the display of the circular green, the red
left-turn arrow aspect may be omitted from the six-aspect face layout, forming the five-aspect signal face
layout shown in Figure 8.11. The left-turn green arrow should be displayed only when no conflicting traffic
movements are permitted.
The yellow and red arrow aspects alone (Figure 8.12) should be provided when the left-turn movement may
be stopped during the circular green display but the requirements for a left-turn green arrow in Figure 8.11
are not met. This occurs infrequently but may be required to stop left-turn traffic for trains or trams.
For left-turn traffic, a green period must be assured when the circular green aspect is displayed alone.
Figure 8.11: Five-aspect signal face layout with yellow Figure 8.12: Five-aspect signal face layout with
and green left-turn arrow aspects red and yellow left-turn arrow
aspects
A four-aspect signal layout with single green arrow aspect (Figure 8.13) may be used only when the left-turn
green arrow display is always terminated simultaneously with the circular green display (i.e. when the circular
yellow display is introduced).
A four-aspect signal layout with single red arrow aspect (Figure 8.14) may be used only when its use is
restricted to the sequence discussed in Section 8.3.4.
This display is used infrequently. It may be used to delay a filter left-turn movement for the protection of
pedestrians or special vehicles, in which case the red arrow should be switched off at the earliest practicable
time (e.g. at the end of the walk period).
Figure 8.13: Four-aspect signal face layout with single Figure 8.14: Four-aspect signal face layout with
left-turn green arrow aspect single left-turn red arrow aspect
or
Refer to Figure 8.6 for permissible two-aspect signal face layouts. Single-aspect layouts are not permitted
except in rare circumstances.
Figure 8.15 summarises the preferred three to six-aspect signal face layouts for normal vehicles including
the more common layouts discussed in Sections 8.2.1 to 8.2.3.
Figure 8.16 shows examples of signal face layouts that are permitted, but not preferred. Any other layouts
are not permitted.
Figure 8.16: Signal face layouts that are permitted but should be avoided if possible
The basic sequence of vehicle displays within a signal face must be green to yellow to red to green as shown
in Figure 8.17. It applies to three-aspect circular, arrow or symbolic arrangements, and four-aspect
arrangements with a green arrow where both greens must terminate at the same time (Figure 8.15).
Some jurisdictions may permit a flashing yellow arrow to be used in certain circumstances. Therefore,
practitioners should consult their jurisdictional guidelines for permitted uses that may utilise the flashing
arrow and for guidance on how and when this may be used in sequence with the other signal aspects.
In addition to the examples of right-turn display sequences for six-aspect arrangements shown in Figure
8.18, examples of display sequences to initiate and terminate arrow-controlled right-turn movements are
illustrated in Figure 8.19 and Figure 8.20 respectively.
Figure 8.21 shows a special display sequence using a four-aspect arrangement with a single right-turn red
arrow aspect as discussed in Section 8.2.2. This figure shows initiation and termination of a filter right-turn
movement.
In some jurisdictions, five or six-aspect signals may be used to operate a partially controlled right turn and a
partially controlled turn with red arrow drop-out. Figure 8.22 and Figure 8.23 show an example of this, where
it is undertaken utilising five and six-aspect signals respectively.
Display sequences to initiate and terminate arrow-controlled left-turn movements are illustrated in
Figure 8.24 and Figure 8.25 respectively.
Figure 8.26 shows a special display sequence using a four-aspect arrangement with a single left-turn red
arrow aspect as discussed in Section 8.2.3. This figure shows initiation and termination of a filter left-turn
movement.
Figure 8.18: Examples of fully-controlled right-turn display sequences for six-aspect arrangements
Right-turn arrow displays change simultaneously with circular displays: right-turn and through movement initiated and
terminated at the same time
Right-turn arrow and circular displays change at different times: terminating the right-turn movement and initiating the
through movement
Right-turn arrow and circular displays change at different times: terminating the through movement and initiating the
right-turn movement
Figure 8.21: Display sequences for four-aspect arrangement with single red right-turn arrow aspect for the
protection of pedestrians or special vehicles
Figure 8.26: Display sequences for four-aspect arrangement with single red left-turn arrow aspect for the
protection of pedestrians or special vehicles
The sequence requirements for two-aspect vehicle signals (where used as regulations permit) are as follows:
• at roundabout metering signals: off to yellow to red to off
• at far right secondary signals: off to green to yellow to off
• at left-turn slip lanes with signalised crossings: off to yellow to red to off.
For pedestrian and bicycle signalised crossings, see Sections 8.3.6 and 8.3.7.
Practitioners should also refer to AS 1742.14 for further guidance on pedestrian signal lanterns and push
buttons, and to Austroads (2019d) for further guidance on signal phasing for pedestrians. However, the
following details are noted.
A pedestrian signal face layout consists of a red pedestrian aspect mounted above a green pedestrian
aspect as shown in Figure 8.1. Pedestrian aspects must never be incorporated with vehicle aspects in a
common signal face.
Basic sequence
The basic sequence for pedestrian displays is steady red to green to flashing red to steady red.
In some jurisdictions, the red pedestrian signal is extinguished until the pedestrian demand is registered. In
this case, the sequence for pedestrian displays is off to steady red (on pedestrian demand) to green to
flashing red to steady red (for a short period, e.g. two seconds) to off.
When pedestrian signal aspects are not provided or are not operating at an intersection, pedestrians may be
controlled by the circular vehicle displays (subject to legislation).
The flashing red pedestrian symbol may be directly replaced with a yellow countdown timer display (within
the same aspect) indicating the number of seconds left (stopping at 1) before a steady red standing
pedestrian is displayed. Figure 8.1 provides an example of how the pedestrian countdown timer would be
incorporated into the pedestrian signal sequence. The green pedestrian symbol and solid red pedestrian
symbol would be unchanged. Various jurisdictions are exploring the use of pedestrian countdown timers.
Following successful trials, jurisdictions are developing guidelines for their use. As it is still a relatively new
application for some jurisdiction, practitioners should refer to jurisdictional guidelines.
Figure 8.27: Pedestrian traffic signal sequence incorporating the pedestrian countdown timer
Practitioners should also refer to Section 8.5.5 and AS 1742.14 for further guidance on bicycle signals at
signalised crossings. However, the following details are noted.
Where permitted by legislation, a bicycle signal face layout consists of a red bicycle aspect mounted above a
green bicycle aspect as shown in Figure 8.1. These two-aspect bicycle lanterns must never be incorporated
with vehicle aspects in a common signal face.
Three-aspect bicycle signals (red, yellow and green bicycle aspects) can also be used to separately control
bicycle movements.
Basic sequence
The basic sequence for bicycle displays with a two-aspect arrangement is steady red to green to flashing red
to steady red. The sequence for bicycle displays with a three-aspect arrangement is green to yellow to red to
green.
When bicycle signals are not provided at signalised intersections, bicycles on the roadway are controlled by
the vehicle signals.
Where permitted by legislation, a special vehicle signal face layout consists of a single column of red and
yellow aspects and a white special vehicle aspect (B for buses, T for trams, or E for emergency vehicles) that
provides control of special vehicle movements (Figure 8.1).
In some cases, it may be necessary for special-purpose aspects to be mounted and aimed separately from
vehicle or pedestrian displays.
Single white aspects are also used to control special vehicle movements.
The sequence for special vehicle displays is red to white to yellow to red. Where white special vehicle
lanterns are displayed as single aspect units, the sequence is off to white to off.
A single white aspect does not fully control a special vehicle movement (i.e. its absence does not compel a
special vehicle to stop).
When the intersection cannot be controlled with the normal vehicle displays due to equipment malfunction or
maintenance activities, the display recommended is flashing yellow at a rate of 1 hertz with equal ‘on’ and
‘off’ times. It indicates that the drivers should proceed through the intersection with caution using
non-signalised intersection road rules.
For this reason, flashing yellow should not be used as a regular, routine mode of operating intersection
signals under any condition other than when the traffic signal is malfunctioning or during maintenance
activities.
Based on AS 1742.14, the designation of signal faces in relation to their location for a given approach is
outlined below, and shown in Figure 8.28.
• Primary signal faces:
Located on the left-hand side, adjacent to the stop line or other point where traffic is required to stop. An
additional primary signal may be installed on the right-hand side on a median or dividing island. Their
principal function is to warn approaching traffic of the state of the signals, and to stop traffic at the correct
position, noting that, in the absence of a stop line, traffic is legally required to stop before passing the
primary signal.
• Secondary signal faces:
Located to the right side of the roadway, beyond the point where traffic is required to stop (e.g. on the far
side of an intersection, in a position readily visible to traffic stopped at the stop line). Their principal
function is to indicate to traffic that is stopped, the start of a running phase.
• Tertiary signal faces:
Located to the left side of the roadway beyond the point where traffic is required to stop. Their principal
function is to back-up the secondary signals.
In addition to the above signal faces, overhead signal faces should be used in the following situations:
• where the stopping sight distance to the post-mounted display is inadequate (e.g. because of vertical or
horizontal alignment, awnings, poles, trees or similar sight obstructions)
• where the roadway is too wide for kerb-mounted lanterns to fall within the driver’s line of sight.
Regardless of the above requirements, overhead signals may be omitted if there is a likelihood that they
could appear to apply to an adjacent upstream signalised intersection.
The minimum signal layout for an undivided, divided and T-junction intersection along with a
pedestrian-actuated traffic signal is shown in Figure 8.28.
A design must provide for the following signal face functions for each approach as relevant:
• Warning display: to alert the approaching drivers to the presence of traffic signal control.
• Stopping display: to inform approaching drivers sufficiently in advance of the stop line that they are
required to stop.
• Starting display: to inform drivers stopped at the stop line when they may proceed.
• Manoeuvring display: to inform drivers about to enter the intersection, or within the intersection, of any
priority or restriction allocated to them.
Each signal face can provide more than one function as detailed in Table 8.1. A signal face does not
adequately provide the function if two or more lanes of traffic separate approaching vehicles and the signal
face.
The minimum number of signal faces for a given approach is three, with the exception of special applications
and facilities (Section 8.5). An approach with a primary, secondary and tertiary signal face satisfactorily
provides for all essential signal face functions while still providing a limited degree of safety in case of
individual lamp failure.
The minimum number of signal faces for each left-turn movement is two. They should be located in the
primary and tertiary locations. Where the road that left-turning vehicles are turning into has a median or
island, the tertiary signal face may be located on that median or island if a suitable post is provided (‘split
tertiary’ arrangement). Signal faces for a channelised left-turn carriageway are covered in Section 8.4.4.
The minimum number of signal faces for each right-turn movement is two. They should be located as follows:
• on a divided road with medians of sufficient width, in the dual primary and secondary locations
• otherwise, preferably in the overhead primary and secondary locations
• as a last choice, in the primary and secondary locations.
Furthermore, if both the secondary and overhead secondary are provided, right-turn aspects should be
placed on both. On a divided road where there are two or more lanes turning right, consideration should be
given to installing a right-turn signal face in the dual (far-right) secondary location.
At intersections where geometry, physical features, approach widths or other factors restrict the functions
provided by only three signal faces, additional signal faces may be necessary, for example at multiple-leg
intersections or where the controlled area is exceptionally large or complex. Excessive numbers of signal
faces add to the visual clutter at the intersection and to intersection operating costs. The provision of
additional signal faces that are not warranted may become confusing.
A dual primary signal face is normally provided when there is a median island of sufficient width, and:
• there are two or more approach lanes
• there are right-turn arrow aspects.
Overhead signal faces mounted on mast arms have been shown to reduce the incidence of adjacent
direction crashes at signalised intersections. They improve conspicuity of the signals and reduce the
likelihood of red light running (Durdin et al, 2016). They are required in the following situations:
• where the stopping sight distance to the post-mounted signal face is inadequate, e.g. because of vertical
or horizontal alignment, awnings, poles, trees or similar sight obstructions
• where the roadway is too wide for kerb-mounted signal faces to fall within the driver’s line of sight.
Care should be exercised with the use of mast arm mounted signals where there are closely spaced
signalised intersections as drivers may be misled regarding which intersection the overhead signal applies
to.
The primary signal face location is preferred for overhead signal faces (Table 8.1) because it provides:
• the greatest sight distance from the stop line
• warning and stopping functions when dual primary signal faces are warranted but cannot be provided.
Provided adequate sight distance is available, an overhead secondary signal face may be used instead of an
overhead primary signal face where additional starting and/or manoeuvring functions are required (e.g. if
secondary median signal faces are not available or for additional right-turn arrow aspects when dual primary
signal faces are not available).
Where two overhead signal faces are required for each approach, primary and secondary signal faces for
opposite approaches are often mounted on the same mast arm to reduce costs.
Provided adequate sight distance is available, an overhead tertiary signal face may be used instead of an
overhead primary signal face when additional starting or manoeuvring functions are required (e.g. for
additional signal faces incorporating left-turn arrows).
Provided signal face functional requirements are met (Section 8.4.2), economy in the use of mast arms can
be achieved by mounting more than one signal face on a mast arm (e.g. on crossroad intersections, a
primary signal face for one approach and a tertiary signal face for the approach from the right).
Unless obstructions such as power lines are present, the mast arm outreach selected should ideally locate
the signal face above the second lane from the kerb.
Where obstructions are present and inadequate sight distance is the main reason for providing an overhead
signal face, the signal face should be located:
• as near as possible to the ideal location
• so that necessary safety clearance from the obstruction is maintained.
The following requirements apply for signalised crossings at intersections and mid-block locations (also see
Mid-block signalised crossings in Section 8.4.4):
• A pedestrian signal face must be provided at each end of a signalised crossing. It should be located
within 1 m of the projection of the crosswalk lines and aimed at the opposite end of the crossing.
• If the crossing width exceeds 10 m, two pedestrian signal faces should be provided at each end of the
crossing.
• If the crossing distance exceeds 25 m, supplementary pedestrian signal faces should be installed on a
median island where practicable.
• The pedestrian signal face should be located, and if necessary screened, to ensure that it is obvious
which crossing is controlled by the signal face.
• Where a crossing is staged as two separate movements, each stage must be signalised as a separate
crossing.
In accordance with AS 1742.14 the push buttons should be orientated so that they are perpendicular to the
crossing with the arrow legend orientated horizontally.
The conspicuity of traffic signals is influenced by a combination of factors such as signal colour, intensity,
size, background luminance and exposure time, as well as the location of the signal in the driver’s visual
field.
Figure 8.29(a) provides examples of the driver lantern visibility templates that may be used for signal layout
design plans to determine if lanterns are located sufficiently close to the driver’s line of sight. The templates
shown in Figure 8.29(a) are for 200 and 300 mm lanterns. Figure 8.29(b) illustrates a typical application of a
visibility template.
The number of signal posts should be minimised for safety and aesthetic reasons (e.g. pedestrian and
vehicle signals can be mounted on a common post, or vehicle signals for different approaches can be
mounted on a common post).
The recommended positions for signal posts and mast arms are detailed below. It is important that these
positions satisfy the requirements of the Commonwealth Disability Discrimination Act 1992 and
AS/NZS 1428.4.
Mast arms are rigid structures and they should only be located where the probability of impact by vehicles is
low (AS 2979).
Kerbside posts and mast arms should be positioned nominally 1 m from the kerb face, but not closer than
0.6 m.
Median posts should be located centrally in the median, or on wide medians the post should not be located
more than 2 m from the relevant kerb face.
Legend
= Pedestrian signal
= Pole
= Traffic signal
Note: Pedestrian push button and arrow legend are not shown.
Figure 8.31: Signal face location for channelised right-turn treatment (seagull)
T-intersections
• Primary signal faces:
Posts for primary signal faces are located as described above.
• Secondary signal faces:
Posts for secondary signal faces at the head of the T are located as described above, but posts for the
stem of the T are located to the right of the projection of the centreline but closer to the line of sight of the
approaching motorist (as shown in Figure 8.32(a)). The preferred location of the signalised crossing is to
the left of the stem as shown in Figure 8.32(b). Figure 8.32(c) shows the relocation of posts for secondary
and tertiary signal faces to allow a common post to be used with a pedestrian signal face.
• Tertiary signal faces:
Posts for tertiary signal faces are located generally as described above, except that some adjustment is
normally made to allow the common post to be shared with the secondary signal face for the stem of the T.
Figure 8.33 shows examples of typical pedestrian mid-block crossings as used by VicRoads. The examples
demonstrate the principles outlined above.
Poles at the intersection of major roads have the highest risk of being involved in a crash. The layout of
signal infrastructure should therefore be undertaken in line with Safe System principles.
Not only do poles pose a crash risk and influence the severity, crashes involving poles supporting traffic
signal equipment contribute substantially to maintenance costs and signal outages.
In order to minimise the collision risk, intersection design should aim to:
• minimise the number of poles by using joint-use poles
• use frangible solutions where possible
• increase the offset of poles to as far from the trafficable lane as possible.
Practitioners should refer to AS 1742.14 for guidance on lantern mounting height. However, in summary, for
lanterns located on the road verge, the lantern height as measured from pavement level to the top of the
lantern assembly should be as follows:
• For vehicle lanterns the mounting height should be 4 m.
• For pedestrian lanterns the mounting height should be 3 m.
The minimum height clearance from the path to the bottom of the target board should be 2 m when located
above a footpath and 2.4 m when located above a bicycle path.
For overhead lanterns located above the roadway, a minimum clearance between the road level and the
bottom of the target board should be at least 5.4 m or an extra 0.1 m above the required height clearance for
the road, where the height clearance is above 5.3 m. Additional clearance beyond the minimum may result in
the lantern being located too far above the driver’s line of sight.
Greater clearances may be required for over-dimensional-load routes. For example, VicRoads requires a
minimum clearance of 6 m for overhead lanterns used for ramp metering on motorways. Practitioners should
refer to the minimum height clearance for routes within their jurisdiction and use this in addition to the
guidelines provided when determining the height of overhead lanterns.
Figure 8.34 shows a typical signal mounting arrangement as used by VicRoads that meets the above
requirements.
Minimum clearances from overhead power lines to any signal equipment are specified by the electricity
authorities. The required clearances vary depending on line voltage, line insulation and local electricity
authority practices, therefore the authority should be consulted if equipment is to be located near power
lines.
The visual range of each lantern is determined by its position, photometric performance and orientation.
Table 8.2 shows the coverage provided by a lantern for various aiming distances.
Table 8.3 lists the recommended aiming distances from the stop line towards the centre of the approach
lanes for stopping and for warning functions.
Starting signals should be aimed at a point 3 m from the stop line at the centre of the approach.
Visual coverage
Aiming distance
Ground mounted Overhead
(metres from lantern)
(metres from lantern)
40 10–70 –
60 20–95 –
80 40–120 50–110
100 55–145 65–140
120 75–170 –
130 – 90–170
140 – 105–195
150 – 125–225
Stopping Warning
Approach speed
(km/h)
(metres from stop line)
40 40 80
50 60 100
60 80 130
70 100 150
80 120 170
Figure 8.33: Typical layouts for mid-block pedestrian operated signals as used by VicRoads
Alternative positions and/or additional lanterns may be provided where fixed obstructions (such as poles,
trees, awnings, underground services and background interference including illuminated advertising signs) or
intersection approach geometry are such that standard positions and numbers of lanterns are not adequate
to carry out the required functions. These are illustrated in the following examples:
• Where the warning or stopping function of primary (or dual primary) lanterns is adversely affected on left-
hand curve approaches, an additional lantern should be provided on the right-hand side of the road.
• Where it is not practicable to screen a lantern effectively from traffic for which the signal display is not
intended, that lantern should be relocated or omitted.
• Where it is necessary to prevent a lantern from being seen by traffic at an upstream stop line, tilting of the
lantern or other measures to limit the field of view can provide effective solutions. Some agencies tilt only
the green face display as the confusion normally only occurs when green is displayed.
• Where a railway line is in close proximity to a signal installation, lantern screening and aiming
arrangements must ensure that signals do not constitute a source of confusion to train drivers (Section
8.5.2).
• Where a low bridge over an approach road obstructs visibility of the lanterns, an advance warning may be
used (as described in Section 8.5.1). When the bridge is adjacent to the intersection, an additional
primary signal may be placed in advance of the bridge, not more than 10 m from the stop line.
To reduce street furniture clutter, suitably located existing utility poles may be used for the mounting of
lanterns, provided that agreement to do so can be obtained from the utility authority. A minimum 1 m
clearance should be provided from lanterns to other separate street furniture items.
Where possible, streetlights and lanterns should be located on one common post or structure under a
joint-use arrangement with the local electricity authority. The use of common posts for mounting guide signs
and signal hardware is encouraged (Section 8.8.1).
8.4.11 Visors
Visors are used to modify the angular visual coverage of the lantern (e.g. to hide the lantern from the view of
drivers on other approaches) and/or to shield the lantern optical system from incident light that may produce
sun-phantom illumination. The following procedures should be noted:
• Table 8.4 details the angle at which the signal is totally cut-off from view for various visors.
• Cutaway visors are used to provide additional visibility on the cutaway side and standard cut-off on the
other side.
• Where no restriction of angular coverage is required an open visor should be used to shield the lantern
from incident light.
• Closed visors are normally used on secondary and tertiary lanterns. The shorter closed visor should be
used unless additional angular cut-off is essential. The longer visors are also more difficult to protect from
damage.
8.4.12 Louvres
Louvres are used when visors are unable to provide the necessary visual cut-off. Their use should be
minimised because louvres reduce the efficiency of the optical system and produce reflected images that are
visible under low ambient lighting. The following procedures should be noted:
• Louvres should not be used in association with symbolic aspects.
• Horizontal louvres are used to:
– minimise sun-phantom illuminations where visors have been proved to be ineffective
– restrict the signal display coverage along the approach.
• Vertical louvres are used to:
– produce the required signal display where the cut-off provided by visors is inadequate (typically at
skewed intersections)
– restrict the visibility of the signal display to a certain lane or lanes of the approach
– shield the lantern from the view of train drivers or other persons in the vicinity of an intersection when
it is desired that they should not be able to see the lantern.
Lantern size Visor type as per Length Angle for total cut off of signal indication
(mm) AS 2144 (mm)
200 Open type A 200 No restriction
200 Closed type B 200 90°
200 Closed type B 300 67°
200 Cutaway type C 300 Open side 32° on closed side
300 Open type A 300 No restriction
300 Closed type B 300 90°
300 Closed type B 400 74°
300 Cutaway type C 400 Open side 37° on closed side
Advance warning signals are an active warning device consisting of a warning sign with alternating flashing
yellow lights. Alternative formats for advance warning signals are shown in Figure 8.35 (note: the two
alternatives shown on the right-hand side of the diagram are not permitted in New Zealand, where MOTSAM
sign PW-64 should be used). An image of an advance warning signal in use is shown in Figure 8.36.
The advance warning device is cabled to the traffic controller and timed as a separate signal group. The
yellow lights should flash alternately, one being off while the other is on, at a frequency of 1 Hz.
There are four main purposes for the use of an active advance warning device (rather than a passive
device):
• On arterial roads with a high proportion of heavy or long combination vehicles, where there is a high risk
of frequent infringement of signals and a high risk of rear-end and cross crashes due to the inability to
stop in time for the red display e.g. due to high approach speeds or significant downhill grade, the
warning device should be located approximately at the stopping sight distance from the stop line of the
intersection, on the approach side of the intersection (AS 1742.14).
• As outlined in Austroads (2019d) the flashing yellow lights are started a fixed time in advance of the
yellow interval when the main through-traffic phase is terminating at the intersection, using the early
cut-off period timer. The flashing lights may be terminated at the onset of the next green display for the
main through-traffic phase, or earlier at the start of the red display.
• A traffic signal installation that is obscured from the view of approaching traffic such that there is a high
risk of collision with the rear end of traffic queued at the signals: the warning device should be located at
not less than the stopping distance in advance of the probable end of the queue.
The yellow lights will need to flash beyond the start of the green display when the sight distance to the
back of the queue for the through movement is a problem. The back of the queue will not begin to move
until some seconds after the green signal is displayed. This time can be calculated as the 95th percentile
queue value (in vehicles) multiplied by the queue departure response time. Akçelik, Besley and Roper
(1999) reported a typical queue departure response time of 1.15 s per vehicle in the queue observed at
intersections in Melbourne and Sydney.
The assembly is generally erected on the left of the approach. However, if it cannot be seen in this
position due to restricted sight distance caused by horizontal left-hand curvature, the assembly should be
erected on the right of the approach. The assembly may also be mounted overhead if the sight distance
to a side-mounted sign is restricted by vertical road curvature.
• A situation where the signal being approached is almost always green. Drivers who regularly approach
the signal would have a low expectation of encountering a red signal.
Note: These signs are not permitted in New Zealand, where MOTSAM sign PW-64 should be used.
If a road signal installation is located in close proximity to a railway level crossing such that there is a
probability that a vehicle queue generated by the road signals will extend across the rail tracks, special
provision should be made to force the road signals to a phase that will clear the queue before the arrival of
the train.
The signal requirements should be determined in consultation with the railway authority.
Use of yellow box pavement markings and fixed or variable message signs such as keep tracks clear may be
effective in preventing vehicles queuing over rail crossings.
Some examples and guidelines for good practice have been documented by the ITE Technical Committee
(ITE 2006) while guidance on traffic management at railway level crossings is given in Austroads (2019c).
Linking requirements
If linking with the railway level crossing is justified, track switches should be provided by the railway authority
to enable the special queue-clearing sequence to be initiated before the flashing red signals commence to
operate.
The road signal sequence should be arranged so that after the queue-clearing phase has terminated, no
phases or turning movements can be introduced for traffic needing to cross the rail tracks until the train has
cleared. The railway track switches should provide an indication when the train has cleared the level
crossing. In the case of a rail crossing provided with manually operated gates, no special provision is
generally required. When the level crossing opens to road traffic, the normal phase sequence is restored and
some compensation can be given to the waiting traffic.
Provision of additional storage may be necessary for vehicles that cannot be released while the railway
crossing is closed.
It may be possible to include the railway level crossing within the conflict area. In this situation the train
movement will need to be treated as a priority phase. The flashing red railway display should be provided as
part of the control.
Special precautions may need to be taken to shield any green roadway display from traffic approaching or
stopped by a flashing red railway display. Similarly, roadway displays should be shielded from the view of
train drivers.
As outlined in AS 1742.14, signals for mid-block access points to or from emergency service facilities may be
provided by using three-aspect signal faces in a similar manner to an intersection.
However, where there are concerns that the green aspect is displayed for very long periods due to the
infrequent operation of the signals, the following alternative signals may be used:
• Two-aspect signals:
The signal faces must contain red and yellow signal aspects only. Operation of the signals comprises a
display of aspects in the sequence off to yellow to red to off where the yellow may be either steady or
flashing. The sign stop here on red signal is provided on the primary signal post if a stop line is not
marked.
• Flashing red signals:
The signal face containing flashing signals comprises a single steady yellow signal surmounted by twin
alternate flashing red signals in the configuration shown in Figure 8.37. Operation of the signals
comprises a display of aspects in the sequence off to yellow to flashing red to off. The yellow signal may
be displayed for longer than the normal yellow period. Signs may be displayed at or near the signals
indicating to road users that they must stop when the lights are flashing.
Figure 8.37: A flashing red signal face which may be used at emergency vehicle facilities
Note: Jurisdictions may use two-aspect signals or even conventional signals as an alternative to the flashing red signal
face as shown.
Source: AS 1742.14.
The layout of signals for emergency vehicle facilities should be in accordance with the typical signal layout
used for the non-terminating road of a standard signalised T-intersection as discussed in Section 8.4. That is,
the signal layout should comprise three signal faces (a primary, secondary and tertiary) for both approaches
of the road in which the emergency vehicle entry point is located.
Special public transport priority treatments at signalised intersections, such as special signal phases for
buses and trams, are used as a travel-demand management measure to encourage the use of public
transport.
Signal aspects and display sequences for buses and trams are described in Sections 8.1.5 and 8.3.8.
Operational arrangements for providing active public transport signal priority are set out in Austroads
(2019d).
Bus priority
A three-aspect column is used to control a bus phase. A bus lane must be designated a bus-only lane for at
least 100 m on the approach to the stop line. This is necessary to legally deny vehicles other than public
buses access to that length of lane. Otherwise, a vehicle could block the bus movement when a white B is
displayed. Other vehicles can legally enter a bus lane up to 100 m before turning or leaving the road. Signs
and pavement markings can be used to designate a length of bus-only lane. The lane adjacent to the bus-
only lane must be marked with left-turn and through arrows if it is a shared lane, or left-turn arrows only if it is
an exclusive left-turn lane. This is essential to legally allow other vehicles to turn left across the bus-only
lane.
A single white B aspect must be one of at least a four-aspect signal face. It is used to provide a priority start
at the beginning of the phase in which other vehicles moving in the same direction as the buses operate. A
single white B aspect is needed only when the buses and vehicles in the adjacent lane merge on the
departure. A priority start is not necessary if the bus lane continues on the departure. Conflicting movements
between buses and other vehicles must be denied or non-existent. The only exception is a merge conflict on
the departure.
It is important to remember that any vehicle classified as a public bus may use a bus or bus-only lane; the
lane will not be used exclusively by buses on a registered route at all times. For example, if a registered bus
route continued left at a signalised intersection, buses on that route would only turn left. However, other
public buses in the bus-only lane could proceed straight ahead or turn right when a white B is displayed. This
must be considered before using B aspects to control buses.
Tram priority
Tram priority is controlled differently from bus priority. Unlike buses, tram direction is controlled by tracks
either located in the centre lanes of a shared roadway or clear of the trafficked lanes in a centrally located
tram reserve.
A three-aspect column is used to control tram movements in their own right of way to eliminate conflicts
between trams and other vehicles and to provide tram-only phases.
A single-aspect white T and five-aspect signal faces as shown in Figure 8.1 and Section 8.2.2 are used to
provide priority for trams on shared roads. The five-aspect signal face is used in conjunction with a
tram-actuated leading right-turn phase to clear queued vehicles between the tram and the stop line. The
single-aspect white T is used with tram-only phases, where trams are on a unique route. Where trams use
alternative routes, white arrows are used to indicate the turning direction.
Where bicycles use signals to cross a road via an off-road facility, bicycle facilities are combined with
pedestrian facilities at signalised intersections and mid-block signalised crossings. Signal sequences for
bicycle and pedestrian signals are described in Section 8.3.7. Signal face site requirements and positioning
of signal equipment for pedestrian signals are discussed in Section 8.4.3 and Section 8.4.4.
Bicycles may be controlled by two-aspect red and green bicycle signal faces, or three-aspect red, yellow and
green bicycle signal faces (Section 8.3.7). The type of bicycle path (e.g. exclusive, shared) is a factor in the
selection of two-aspect or three-aspect signal faces.
A bicycle rider is required to dismount 7 when crossing a road from a footpath, bicycle path, shared path or
separated path whether traffic signals are installed or not. However, where bicycle lanterns are installed, a
rider facing a bicycle signal may negotiate the intersection or mid-block location without dismounting.
7 In Queensland, cyclists are not required to dismount when crossing pedestrian crossings, crosswalks and children’s crossings.
Where bicycles use on-road facilities, it is recommended that, at intersections, a stop line for bicycles is
placed 2 m downstream of the normal stop line so that left-turning motor vehicle drivers, in particular bus and
truck drivers, will be aware of bicycles waiting for a green signal. If vehicles cannot turn left, there is no need
for this treatment.
Detailed information on traffic control devices for bicycle facilities is provided in AS 1742.9.
Roundabout metering signals may be used where excessive queuing and delays are observed on one or
more legs of a roundabout due to heavy circulating flow rates, especially in the case of strongly directional
origin-destination movements. In this case, a dominant approach stream constitutes the major proportion of
traffic in the circulating stream that causes a significant reduction in the capacity of the approach that has to
give way to the circulating stream. These signals are usually employed on a part-time basis since they may
be required only when heavy demand conditions occur during peak periods.
Two-aspect yellow and red signals are used for roundabout metering as shown in Figure 8.6(a). The
sequence of aspect display is off to yellow to red to off. When metering is not required neither aspect is
displayed.
Figure 8.38 shows the use of metering signals at a roundabout. The signalised approach is referred to as the
‘metered approach’ and the approach with the queue detector as the ‘controlling approach’.
When the queue on the controlling approach extends back to the queue detector, the signals on the metered
approach operate so as to create a gap in the circulating flow. This helps the controlling approach traffic to
enter the roundabout. When the red display is terminated on the metered approach, the roundabout reverts
to normal operation.
The introduction and duration of the red signal on the metered approach is determined by the controlling
approach traffic. The duration of the blank signal is determined according to a minimum blank time
requirement, or extended by the metered approach traffic if vehicle detectors are used on that approach.
A minimum of two signal faces, one primary and one tertiary, must be installed. A regulatory sign stop here
on red signal must be fixed to any signal post erected adjacent to the stop line, as drivers do not expect to
stop at the advance stop line location. Stop lines must be located not less than 3 m in advance of the
approach holding line but preferably should be positioned approximately 20 m from the holding line. Queue
detector setback distance on the controlling approach is usually in the range 50 to 120 m.
Various site-specific methods may also be used to meter traffic (e.g. using an existing upstream mid-block
signalised crossing on the metered approach).
In some cases, it may be necessary to supplement the traffic signals with explanatory fixed or variable
message signposting. Where sight restrictions exist, advance warning signals should be considered.
The use of metering signals at intersections controlled by give-way or stop signs is an unusual application,
and can only be applied where local traffic regulations permit. The system is similar in operation to
roundabout metering signals (Section 8.5.6). However, it is only recommended for local urban collector roads
where the posted speed limit is 60 km/h or below.
The objective of the system is to reduce excessive delays experienced by sign-controlled movements that
have difficulty in finding adequate gaps in priority traffic streams. As an alternative to full signalisation, the
metering signals are employed on a part-time basis at sites where they are required only during peak
demand periods.
This arrangement consists of two-aspect yellow and red signals (Figure 8.6(a)) for metering the major road
traffic, and a queue detector for vehicles waiting on the sign-controlled approach. The sequence of aspect
display is off to yellow to red to off.
When metering is not required, metering signals facing the major road traffic are in off state (blank display).
When the queue detector on the approach subject to sign control detects vehicles waiting, the metering
signals display yellow and then red. When the red display is terminated on the major road, the intersection
reverts to normal operation. In one jurisdiction, two-aspect yellow and green displays are used on the sign-
controlled approach. In this case, the display sequence is off to green to yellow to off.
A regulatory stop here on red signal sign is used at the major road stop line as in the case of roundabout
metering signals.
Seagull T-intersections
The purpose of a ‘seagull’ treatment of a signalised T-intersection is to avoid stopping through vehicles on
the major road, approaching from the left of the T-intersection stem as shown in Figure 8.39(a). This through
movement is not signal controlled and operates continuously as shown in Figure 8.39(b). However, this
movement could be signalised in order to make provision for pedestrians crossing. When there is pedestrian
demand, the through movement would be stopped when the side-road movement operates (e.g. in Phase C
in Figure 8.39(b)).
Generally, traffic signals should be installed on seagull intersections only where right-turn vehicles from the
stem of the T-intersection do not have to merge with through traffic on the departure and weave across
through traffic to turn left just beyond the signals. Any merging by these right-turn vehicles can result in
rear-end collisions.
If traffic has to merge on the departure, the safest option is for through traffic in the left-most lane to merge to
its right. This means providing right-turn vehicles from the stem of the T-intersection with their own lane or
lanes on the departure as shown in Figure 8.39(a).
A capacity and performance evaluation should be carried out to determine if the seagull operation is more
efficient than other intersection design options. This should account for lane under-utilisation on the major
approach road from the left of the T-intersection that is likely to be caused by this treatment.
‘Paired intersection’ is a term used for two closely spaced intersections with limited queuing space between
the two intersections (internal approaches). Typical examples are staggered T-intersections and motorway
diamond interchanges as shown in Figure 8.40(a) and (b). Intersections with a wide median have similar
characteristics.
Paired intersections are regulated either by a single traffic signal controller using built-in offset arrangements
achieved through special phasing arrangements, or by two separate signal controllers that are linked under a
signal coordination system.
With paired intersections, care should be taken to avoid the potential ‘see through’ problem (i.e. downstream
green signals being seen by motorists stopped at the upstream stop line).
Severe unequal lane utilisation may be observed due to heavy origin-destination flows in paired intersection
systems (e.g. ‘dog-leg’ movements at staggered T-intersections). This should be taken into account in
designing geometry and signal phasing for paired intersections.
It is important to ensure that adequate queue storage spaces are provided for vehicles turning right from
internal approaches to the motorway entry ramps.
At intersections with more than four legs, potentially, there are more than four origin-destination movements
from each approach road. The design of lane arrangements and signal phasings for such intersections is a
significantly more complex task. Where allowed, U-turn movements will also need to be considered in the
design (refer to AS 1742.14). Generally, these complex intersections would be treated on a site-specific
basis.
An example of a five-way intersection geometry and phasing arrangement is shown in Figure 8.41.
The complexity of signal design for such intersections depends on the number of conflicting vehicle
movements. The main aim is to minimise the number of phases as much as possible by eliminating some of
the conflicting movements. This may mean banning some movements by using regulatory signs, introducing
one-way approach and one-way exit conditions, or introducing partial or total road closure. Where
movements are banned, alternative routes should be available and may need to be signposted as such. In
Figure 8.41, the east leg is a one-way approach, and the right-turn movement from the west leg to the south
leg is banned.
Pavement markings should reflect the physical direction of travel as appropriate as shown in Figure 8.41.
This consideration also applies to three-way and four-way intersections where legs intersect at other than
90° angles (e.g. Y-junctions).
Signalised crossings may require special attention, depending on the vehicle movements permitted in the
same phase, to ensure that there are no safety problems. The inclusion of signal-controlled bus, bicycle, or
tram lanes can further complicate the signal phasing for this type of intersection. Where possible these
special vehicles should be controlled by normal vehicular displays.
For intersections where legs intersect at other than 90° angles, care needs to be taken to avoid the potential
see-through problem, by ensuring that the green signals on one leg are not seen by drivers on an adjacent leg.
Overhead lane control signals may be used to control a reversible-flow lane as part of a peak-period tidal
flow scheme, or to control lane usage at a toll station or a similar facility. When used to control the use of
lanes in a managed motorway system (including controlling the speed of the lane and whether the lane is
trafficable or not) the signals are referred to as lane use management system (LUMS) signs.
Table 8.5 outlines various overhead lane control signals that are used to control the traffic flow operation of
the lane.
Where a lane control signal aspect display is not required to change since the traffic is always allowed to use
the lane in the same direction, it may be replaced by a fixed sign, subject to various conditions, including:
• The lane arrow must be a downward pointing white arrow on a black background or black arrow on a
white background.
• The lane cross must be red on a white background.
• The minimum signboard size must be 600 x 600 mm.
• On each set of signals across a roadway, signals over lanes immediately to the left or right of reversible
lanes must be signal aspects and not sign alternatives.
• Sign alternatives must be as conspicuous as the signal displays. The white portion of the sign must
comprise retroreflective material, and external illumination must be considered for this purpose.
Further information on the use of lane control signals in motorway LUMS is given in Austroads (2019d).
Figure 8.42 shows an example of LUMS in action, directing vehicles out of the left lane and then later closing
the lane to traffic.
Table 8.5: Signal face layouts with arrow and cross aspects for overhead lane controls
Symbol Description
Merge left
Used on the approach to a lane closure.
Merge right
Used on the approach to a lane closure.
1 A flashing red cross may be used in some jurisdictions on the approach to a lane closure to indicate that the lane
ahead is closed and for drivers to leave the lane immediately. Where used, it should be supported by the jurisdiction’s
version of the Australian Road Rules.
2 The set used may depend on the capability of the lantern display.
Single-lane operation
For permanent and temporary fixed traffic signals, signal faces comprise a single column with three circle
aspects. A primary signal face must be installed on each approach. Both secondary and tertiary signal faces
are recommended for each approach in case of lamp failure. The minimum requirement is two signal faces
for each approach. The secondary and tertiary signal faces are installed 6 to 10 m beyond the primary signal
face. A regulatory sign stop here on red signal is erected adjacent to the stop line.
The general treatment for single-lane operation is to use two phases where one phase controls each
direction of traffic. This requires very long intergreen times to allow one movement to clear the conflict area
before the other movement can be started. This causes long delays that could lead to driver frustration. This
cannot be avoided in heavy traffic situations, but delays can be reduced in low traffic situations by adding an
all-red phase. The controller will normally wait in the all-red phase until one of the other two phases is
demanded. That phase can then be introduced immediately with minimum delay to the motorist. The phase
is extended and terminated as usual.
Where guard fence is used on the single-lane bridge approaches, it should be extended if necessary to
protect the traffic signal posts and controller.
Portable signals
Portable traffic signals are intended primarily for short-term application of single-lane operation. If conditions
are to continue unchanged for longer than two or three months, consideration should be given to the
installation of temporary fixed, rather than portable, traffic signals. Decisions regarding this can be made on
safety and economic grounds.
Portable traffic signals comprise a single column with three circle aspects, and are usually trailer mounted or
in tripod format. One signal face is required to control each direction of travel. This is located at (or 6 m
downstream of) the stop line or stopping position on each approach. A regulatory sign stop here on red
signal is also erected adjacent to the stop line.
Requirements for the design, construction and performance of portable traffic signal systems are specified in
AS 4191. Location and operation of portable traffic signals is described in AS 1742.3 (which is currently
being updated with an expected completion date of 2017).
In some jurisdictions a left turn on red (LTOR) movement is permitted under certain circumstances. In such
cases a left turn on red permitted after stopping sign allows vehicles on the signed signalised intersection
approach to turn left when facing a red circle display, subject to having first stopped at the stop line on that
approach, then proceeding only if it is safe to do so. Location of the LTOR sign is discussed in Section 8.8.2.
LTOR may be used as a delay reduction measure, subject to any jurisdictional regulations and the criteria
described in AS 1742.14 to ensure the safety of pedestrians, bicyclists and motorists. Due to concerns
related to drivers not stopping before turning and to issues regarding the safety of pedestrians, some
jurisdictions do not permit the use of LTOR while others may impose additional conditions and restrictions to
those outlined in Section 7.5.1 of AS 1742.14. LTOR may be considered for use where the left-turn
movement is controlled by circular aspects only.
In addition to the conditions for use specified in AS 1742.14, LTOR is not permitted on any approach where
the movement would conflict with a bus or tram movement proceeding on a white display.
The vehicle detectors in the left lane where LTOR is used will need to be set up to ensure that a vehicle
having turned from the lane during the red period does not unnecessarily initiate a phase change.
Slip lanes should not be provided with LTOR signs as other road rules apply to this situation.
Three-aspect red, yellow and green signals are used for ramp metering. The sequence of aspect display is
as per a standard three-aspect traffic signal (a short cycle e.g. a few seconds depending on the magnitude of
the metering as determined by the metering control algorithm) of red to green to yellow to red. When
metering is not required all aspects are turned off.
A typical ramp metering signal layout for an entry ramp with two metered lanes is shown in Figure 8.43. It
shows RC1 signs used to warn motorist on the approach to a ramp that ramp signals are present and
currently in operation. The additional RC2 signs may be used in conjunction with a W3-3 signal warning sign
where the sight distance is poor or where deemed appropriate. Typical entry freeway ramp signals for two
lanes metered plus metered priority lane and for two lanes metered plus freeflow priority lane are shown in
Figure 8.44 and Figure 8.45 respectively.
The signals are driven by a ramp metering controller that permits one vehicle to enter the motorway each
time the green signal is displayed. In the case of ramps where traffic queues in two lanes at the metering
signal, a ‘dual release’ system displays green signals to each queue simultaneously. Different acceleration
rates of neighbouring vehicles enable the vehicles to progress along the acceleration lane at different rates.
Signal faces should be located to the side of the ramp and overhead. The distance from the associated stop
line to the entrance ramp nose must be sufficient to allow a vehicle stopped at the signals to accelerate to
motorway speed before merging with the traffic stream. Adequate provision for queuing at the signals should
also be made, including provision for possible queuing back beyond the ramp.
As shown in Figure 8.43, the signals at the on-ramp should be accompanied by VMS which indicate that the
ramp signals are on (ramp signals on message) and that drivers should be prepared to stop (prepare to stop
message) when the ramp signals are operating.
Motorways that operate at or near capacity for significant periods of the day are suitable for the deployment
of ramp metering systems. For motorist acceptance and compliance, the system must operate efficiently and
not appear to unnecessarily delay ramp traffic.
Many ramp metering systems are operated in conjunction with motorway management systems7F8. In this
case, ramp metering controllers are connected to a central computer that processes data from vehicle
detectors on the motorway and ramps, and computes appropriate ramp flow rates.
8 Other terms may be used by road agencies to refer to a motorway management system such as motorway control system, freeway
management system or freeway control system.
Figure 8.43: Typical entry freeway ramp signals for two lanes metered
Figure 8.44: Typical entry freeway ramp signals for two lanes metered plus metered priority lane
Figure 8.45: Typical freeway ramp signal for two lanes metered plus freeflow priority lane
Pavement markings at traffic signals are often obscured by general traffic. Therefore, they must be properly
maintained for the effective and safe operation of signals.
Dividing lines
Unbroken dividing lines are marked on the road to separate opposing traffic movements on the approaches
to signalised intersections and mid-block signalised crossings on undivided roads.
An unbroken dividing line may be a single unbroken line or a parallel pair of unbroken lines. Both types of
dividing lines prevent overtaking. A single unbroken line may be crossed to enter or leave the road, but a
parallel pair of unbroken lines may not be crossed to enter or leave the road unless a local jurisdiction road
rule permits.
Normally, dividing lines should be provided for a minimum of 30 m on the approach to the stop line. This
length may be extended if road conditions on an intersection approach require it.
Lane lines
On the immediate approaches to traffic signals, the use of lane lines is essential where the approach width
will accommodate two or more traffic streams. Lane lines are generally broken lines but must be unbroken
where lane changing is to be prohibited on the approach.
Turn lines
Turn lines are used to provide guidance for two or more traffic streams turning in the same direction. Turn
lines are not used for single turning movements unless in their absence, opposing right turns would be in
danger of colliding, or the turning path to the departure is not obvious under all conditions.
Where opposing right-turn movements operate in the same phase, care must be taken with positioning turn
lines so that sufficient swept width is provided for each vehicle and a sufficient gap is left between opposing
turning traffic. The use of Austroads turning path templates can assist with positioning and determining the
radii of turn lines (Austroads 2013). It is suggested that a gap of 1.2 to 2.0 m is provided between the
overhang lines of the Austroads templates. At major urban intersections with double right-turn lanes from
opposite directions, it is necessary to select the design vehicles for the turns (e.g. car and semi-trailer from
both directions).
9 It is noted that MOTSAM is progressively being replaced by the NZ Traffic Control Devices Manual.
Stop lines
Stop lines indicate to drivers the point behind which vehicles must stop when required (e.g. during the red
interval). Where approach speeds are 80 km/h or above, lines 600 mm wide are preferred, elsewhere lines
450 mm wide are preferred, although 300 mm lines may be used.
In accordance with AS 1742.14, the stop lines should generally be located as follows:
• so as to minimise inter-green times and clearance times
• no less than 3 m from conflicting vehicle movements (or 4.4 m if a future pedestrian crosswalk is
anticipated)
• adjacent to or not more than 3 m in advance of a primary signal post
• clear of the swept path of vehicles (especially articulated vehicles) turning from other approaches
• 1.2 m minimum from parallel pedestrian crosswalks at intersections (measured from the outside edge of
the pedestrian crosswalk to the centre of the stop line)
• 6.0 m minimum from signalised mid-block pedestrian crossings (measured from the outside edge of the
pedestrian crosswalk to the centre of the stop line)
• at a minimum of 6 m (desirable 10 m) in advance of the secondary or tertiary signal face for that approach
• at an angle of between 70° and 110° to the direction of travel.
Where bicycle head-start storage is provided, the location of the stop line should be in accordance with
AS 1742.9.
The signalised crossing should be at least 2.4 m wide and delineated by two parallel 150 mm wide broken
lines with 1 m line segments and 300 mm gaps.
The pedestrian crosswalk lines must be accompanied by a stop line of 450 mm width (preferred) located on
the approach side of the road to the crosswalk lines and located at least 1.2 m in advance of the pedestrian
crosswalk lines.
As outlined in AS 1742.14 this width may be increased by up to 10 m when there are heavy pedestrian
volumes but consideration should be given to signal timings and time for vehicles to clear the width at the
designated speed of the road environment. The line nearest the centre of the intersection should be not less
than 0.6 m (desirably 1.0 m) clear of the cross-street kerbline projection. For scramble crossings
(Section 8.8.2) the lines nearest the centre of the intersection are removed, and in some jurisdictions,
diagonal lines connecting opposite corners of the controlled area are used.
Signalised crossings should generally follow the shortest route across the carriageway, or be angled at no
more than 20° to the pedestrian’s shortest route.
Pedestrian (zebra) crossings defined by parallel white stripes on the road surface and two walking legs signs
are not used within the controlled area of signalised intersections. However, some jurisdictions use marked
pedestrian crossings at unsignalised slip lanes at signalised intersections.
Painted areas may be linemarked to prevent or permit vehicles to cross the area:
• A single broken outline will permit vehicles to cross the median or island to overtake vehicles, enter an
abutting property, or enter the road from an abutting property.
• A single unbroken outline will prevent overtaking, but enable a vehicle to cross the median or island to
enter a turn bay, enter an abutting property, or enter the road from an abutting property.
• Double unbroken outlines will prevent overtaking, turning to access an abutting property, entering the
road from an abutting property, or crossing the painted area to enter a turn bay.
Traffic signal posts must not be placed in the painted areas, and should always be located behind raised
kerbing.
The use of pavement messages and symbols should be minimised in advance of signalised intersections.
They may be hazardous if placed in the path of braking traffic. Where advance warning of signals is required,
signs should be used in lieu of pavement messages.
The keep clear marking may be used at minor unsignalised intersections and access roads where entering
or exiting traffic may be impeded by queues from a nearby signalised intersection.
Pavement arrows in a lane are provided to indicate the direction in which a driver is legally obliged to travel
through the intersection from that lane. They should only be used where necessary so that skidding
problems for motorcycles are minimised. They should not be used to indicate a turn where the turn is
restricted during certain hours of the day.
These devices may be used to augment painted lines at traffic signals where it is considered necessary to
improve night or wet-weather visibility, or to indicate paths that would otherwise be confusing.
Reflective markers are often used on intersection approaches whereas non-reflective markers may be used
to delineate lanes that change direction through the intersection (e.g. curves and misalignment between
approach and departure lanes).
Unless otherwise specified in this section, all signs should be designed and located in accordance with AS
1742. Refer to AS 1742.1 for a general index of signs and AS 1742.2 for treatment at intersections. Sign
numbers given in this section refer to those based on these standards. In New Zealand, reference should be
made to MOTSAM Part 1.
Erection
At signalised intersections, signs must not be located where they obscure signal displays or limit the sight
distance to conflicting or merging traffic. Sight distance is important in the event of signal failure.
To reduce the number of posts at a signalised intersection, it may be possible to mount small signs on signal
posts provided the posts are suitably located and the signs do not interfere with signal operation or
maintenance.
Periodic signs
It is often necessary to prohibit certain movements or classes of vehicles in order to maximise intersection
throughput in peak traffic demand periods. At signalised intersections, this may be achieved by:
• the use of regulatory signs together with supplementary plates showing the times of operation; this type of
prohibition applies regardless of traffic variations (e.g. 4.00 to 6.00 pm, Monday to Friday)
• the use of changeable message signs that are displayed only when the restriction applies; the display
may be achieved by internal illumination or by mechanical rotation or shutters.
The restriction can be imposed as required in association with an area traffic control plan and in combination
with a suitable signal display. The installation and maintenance costs are higher than fixed signs. Operational
safety in the breakdown mode should be ensured.
Illuminated signs
Internally illuminated, fibre optic and LED signs are used at signalised intersections. These signs can
comprise an illuminated white legend (e.g. no right turn on a black background), or a symbolic sign (e.g. a no
right turn symbol).
Illuminated signs may apply continuously or at certain limited times during the day. They may flash
continuously or for that part of the signal cycle when emphasis is required.
Parking signs
Signs controlling or prohibiting parking or stopping are used extensively in the vicinity of signalised
intersections in order to improve intersection capacity and to reinforce statutory no-stopping requirements
associated with traffic signals (see R5 series signs in AS 1742.11).
The stop here on red signal and stop here on red arrow signs (R6-6 and R6-14 shown in Figure 8.46) are not
intended for routine use at signalised intersections. Uses are generally limited to the following:
• to define a stopping point which is different from the location of the primary signal, and where the
stopping point cannot be adequately defined by a stop line
• in situations where traffic turning with a green signal is required to stop at a red signal in the cross street
(e.g. internal approaches of staggered T-intersections) or within a wide median opening where right-turn
traffic filtering through an opposing stream is not safe
• as a reinforcement in situations where signals might be unexpected such as at temporary signals.
Figure 8.46: Stop here on red signal (R6-6) and stop here on red arrow (R6-14) signs
The give-way to pedestrians sign (R2-10 shown in Figure 8.47) is used at signalised intersections under the
following circumstances:
• Turning vehicles are observed not to give way to pedestrians using a signalised crossing. This may occur
with filter right-turn movements through a parallel pedestrian movement where the signalised crossing
distance is long. In this case, the right-turn movement may become established before a pedestrian
enters the conflict zone, particularly from the same side of the road that the right turn commences.
• Turning traffic experiences an unexpected conflict with a signalised pedestrian movement. This can occur
where the signalised crossing is located a short distance down the street being entered. In this situation,
turning-vehicle drivers may assume there is no crossing and may become unaware of pedestrians.
The sign should only be used in the above circumstances. Indiscriminate use would reduce the effectiveness
of the sign and the traffic regulation that requires drivers to give way to pedestrians crossing the road that the
drivers are entering.
Generally, this sign is erected on the same traffic signal posts as the signal faces which control the
movement.
Internally illuminated or fibre optic give-way to pedestrians signs that are activated by pedestrian demand
may be used for greater conspicuity.
The pedestrians may cross diagonally (or pedestrian scramble-crossing) sign allows pedestrians to cross the
road diagonally at signalised intersections where an exclusive pedestrian phase is used (sign R3-5 for use
on the left hand side of the crossing is shown in Figure 8.48).
During the scramble-crossing phase, all pedestrian movements including diagonal movements operate
simultaneously within the marked limits of the crossing. Scramble-crossing phases must operate full time.
They should be installed only where there is demonstrated need for pedestrians to cross diagonally and
there are delay reductions to vehicles and pedestrians.
Figure 8.48: Pedestrian scramble-crossing (R3-5) sign for use on the left hand side of the crossing
Signs to control turning movements consist of turn ban signs and must turn signs (Figure 8.49). These signs
must always be consistent with signal arrow displays and/or pavement arrow markings. Generally, these
signs are erected on the same traffic signal posts as the signal faces which control the movement.
No left turn (R2-6L), no right turn (R2-6R), and no turns (R2-7) signs are used to ban turning movements.
Turn bans can be full-time or part-time (limiting their operation to certain times of day). For part-time turn
bans, signs R2-6L and R2-6R are used with a time-of-operation supplementary plate (R9-1) showing the
times the turn is banned as shown in Figure 8.50.
Figure 8.50: Supplementary time-of-operation plates for part-time turn bans (R9-1)
No left turn or no right turn may be controlled by internally illuminated signs as an alternative to R2-6L and
R2-6R signs.
Special vehicles may be excepted from the turn ban if necessary. Further supplementary plates for buses
(R9-2), bicycles (R9-3) or authorised vehicles (R9-4) can be used for this purpose (Figure 8.51).
Figure 8.51: Supplementary plates excepting special vehicles from turn bans
Left lane must turn left (R2-9L) and right lane must turn right (R2-9R) signs are used where a mid-block
through lane becomes an exclusive turn lane at the intersection.
This lane arrangement practice should be discouraged and avoided if possible as it can lead to lane-change
crashes.
Some road jurisdictions’ road rules prohibit U-turns at signalised intersections. Where prohibited signs must
be erected to allow U-turns, where it is considered safe to do so. In these scenarios the U-turn permitted sign
is used (Figure 8.52). As a general rule the sign should only be used on intersection approaches with
medians and preferably with right-turn auxiliary lanes. U-turns should only be permitted where:
• geometry is sufficient to allow the U-turn to be made in one manoeuvre by vehicles of the type likely to
make the turn
• there are no more than two opposing through lanes of traffic (may not apply where a fully controlled right-
turn phase is provided)
• there is adequate visibility of approaching vehicles (may not apply where a fully controlled right-turn
phase is provided)
• there would be no danger to pedestrians
• there is no left-turn green arrow control in the road to the right.
Supplementary plates such as light vehicles only can be used with the U-turn permitted sign in order to
advise of site restrictions such as limited turning radii.
The left turn on red permitted after stopping sign (R2-20) is used to allow vehicles on any approach where
this sign is displayed, to turn left through a red circle display after first stopping at the stop line, provided it is
safe to do so (Figure 8.53). See Section 8.5.13 for more detailed advice on LTOR.
This sign is mounted below the primary signal face. A supplementary sign should also be mounted below the
tertiary signal face if drivers have difficulty seeing the sign at the primary signal position when stopped at the
stop line.
Figure 8.53: Left turn on red permitted after stopping (R2-20) sign
The right turn from left only sign (Figure 8.54) is used at an intersection controlled by traffic signals where
right-turning drivers are required to make a hook turn. This manoeuvre consists of entering the intersection
from the far-left side of the approach road, moving forward while keeping to the left of the intersection and
clear of any vehicle crossing the intersection, waiting in that position until the traffic lights on the road to the
right change to green, and then turning into that road.
This sign must be located in such a position that it is clearly seen by drivers approaching the intersection
(e.g. overhead location).
Warning signs
The symbolic signals ahead sign W3-3 (Figure 8.55) is required where:
• the sight distance to the signal stop line or to the back of the stationary queue at the signals is less than
the stopping sight distance (e.g. 115 m for a speed of 80 km/h)
• the signals are located in an unexpected position (e.g. temporary signals in a rural area)
• high approach speeds may lead to frequent infringement of the signals or to crashes (especially when
coupled with a large downhill grade).
This sign is usually used at the first set of signals encountered when approaching from a rural speed zone of
80 km/h or more. In some instances, duplication of the sign on the opposite side of the road may be
warranted.
A prepare to stop supplementary plate W8-27 (Figure 8.35) should also be considered in order to reinforce
the signals ahead sign. Under circumstances where this is considered to be inadequate, flashing yellow
signals should be used to attract special attention to these signs (Figure 8.35). AS 1742.2 gives stopping
sight distance values for various design speeds.
Other signs
Other signs used at signalised intersections include form 1 lane (G9-15), form 2 lanes (G9-16), no hook turn
by bicycles (R2-22), and symbolic walking legs sign for marked pedestrian crossings on slip lanes (R3-1).
In addition, jurisdictions may use a sign or method to obscure some or all signal faces for each approach to a
signalised intersection. This may be undertaken prior to the commissioning of a new set of signals. Different
jurisdictions may use different methods and signs to obscure traffic signals, and practitioners should refer to
jurisdictional guidance when considering approaches to obscure traffic signal faces.
9. Traffic Islands
The function of traffic islands, their classification and layout and geometric design including guidelines on
usage, size, shape and other factors are described in Austroads (2019c). The use of traffic islands at
roundabouts is covered in Austroads (2017c and 2019c). Detailed definitions are given Austroads (2015d).
Traffic islands are an integral component of geometric design. Their functions include traffic control and
guidance, separation of conflicting traffic movements and segregation and / or refuge for vulnerable road
users. Traffic islands are an essential element of safe roads and roadside under the Safe System.
Care needs to be exercised when designing traffic islands to ensure that they are not hazardous, particularly
for motorcyclists and bicyclists. They must be clearly visible in all conditions, which means that they need to
be delineated by appropriate signs and markings and/or be well illuminated.
The following guidance is limited to traffic islands created by the use of devices such as pavement markings,
coloured or textured surface treatments and safety bars or rumble strips applied to the surface of the road.
It is important in designing traffic islands and medians to ensure that they are large enough to accommodate
the number of pedestrians that might seek refuge on them during staged crossing of the road. They should
also adequately cater for aged and disabled pedestrians.
An outer separator is a raised longitudinal island between a through-traffic carriageway and a service road
that provides access to abutting properties. Its primary purpose is to separate through traffic from local traffic
and other frontage activities, leading to a more efficient arterial road and safer access. It is important that the
design of outer separator openings ensures that drivers leaving the main carriageway do not unduly interfere
with following traffic flow, that they enter the service road at a safe speed, and that drivers entering the main
carriageway from the service road have adequate sight distance. Flush or painted outer separators are not
recommended, and should not be used with two-way service roads.
Medians separate traffic flowing in opposite directions. Islands may separate traffic flowing in the same
direction or in opposite directions. Medians and islands can be raised, depressed or defined by markings or
contrasting material on the pavement. It should be kept in mind that medians without barriers only provide
partial protection against head-on collisions. Median barriers are recognised as a key component of Safe
System compliant infrastructure, particularly on high speed roads.
Further information on the use of traffic islands, medians and outer separators in traffic management on arterial
roads, including guidelines on width requirements to cater for various purposes, is given in Austroads (2019b).
Painted medians and islands do not have the same degree of physical control or conspicuity as raised
installations, particularly when the surface is wet or under poor light conditions. Therefore, raised medians
and islands are generally preferred.
Islands at intersections should be designed to suit turning paths of design vehicles and maintain continuity of
the major road through the intersection.
There are many situations where it is desirable to provide some form of traffic channelisation at relatively low
cost, without significantly affecting surface drainage, or without entirely prohibiting the possible
encroachment into or traversing of these areas by vehicles. This may be achieved by the use of flush or
painted median or island treatments. The interior may be either sealed with a contrasting coloured aggregate
and/or consist of diagonal or chevron markings. Flush devices may be better defined by outlining areas of
pavement with painted lines and raised pavement markers. These treatments may be used:
• where the resultant width between kerbs would be too narrow for a raised median
• on approaches to a raised or depressed median.
The treatments may also be used where an intersection is unlit. It is noted, however, that raised channelising
islands at unlit rural intersections can operate satisfactorily provided there is appropriate delineation and
offsets to the nose of the island, with a painted chevron on the approach. This may be preferable to large
areas of flush island.
Minimum dimensions for painted medians and islands are provided in Austroads (2019c).
In general, the use of these islands anticipates occasional traversing by some vehicles. They should
therefore be kept free of signs, poles or other road furniture items, except that in certain circumstances
special-purpose light, fully flexible, delineating posts or cones may be used to increase the general visibility
and delineation of the traffic island. This should only be done in well-lit low-speed areas.
Painted medians may be used as a road surface treatment aimed at addressing excessive vehicle speeds.
Introducing a painted median may reduce instances of speeding through decreasing the available lane width
for drivers to negotiate (particularly if the lane width is reduced below 3 m), while still allowing a recovery
zone.
Typical pedestrian behaviour is to use a direct route between two points, even at increased risk. Kerbed or
raised medians can help reduce the risk for pedestrians as they provide a refuge area. Where flush medians
and islands (or wide centreline treatments) are used in a location where pedestrians may cross, then refuge
islands at intervals should be used to create adequate separation of traffic and refuge space for pedestrians.
Wide centrelines are a type of flush median treatment, also known as the narrow painted median strip
treatment (Figure 9.1).
The purpose of the treatment is to provide separation between opposing traffic flows and a recovery space
for vehicles encroaching towards the opposing lane. Their objective is to improve safety by reducing the
potential for head-on crashes.
A New Zealand study of 15 trial locations (MWH 2013) reached the following conclusions:
• The treatments decreased the injury crash rate, the fatal and serious crash rate, and the death and
serious injury crash rate with the greatest reductions being in the death and serious injury crash rate
which approximately halved.
• The treatments on highways with over 14 000 vpd provided large reductions (> 66%) in head-on injury
crashes, although some sites also had audio-tactile linemarking (ATLM) installed. It was noted that sites
without ATLM had little difference in the crash rate between pre and post-treatments. This suggests that
ATLM should also be considered when installing wide centreline treatments particularly at large-volume
sites.
• The treatments resulted in a reduction in run-off-road crashes with sites with ATLM showing the biggest
reductions.
While wide centreline treatments with ATLM have proven safety benefits, they do not eliminate the risk of
head-on crashes. Austroads (2016b) classifies wide centreline treatments as a supporting Safe System
treatment for head-on crashes with compatibility with future implementation of Safe System options, rather
than a primary treatment.
Wide centreline treatments could be considered for use on high-speed roads (i.e. > 90 km/h) as well as other
roads where head-on collisions are an issue, or a major risk of becoming an issue, and where other
measures such as providing a physical obstruction, such as wire rope barrier or adding an additional lane are
not practical or cost-effective. Unlike the provision of a physical obstruction, such as a wire rope barrier (as
shown in Figure 9.2), wide centrelines may be designed to permit drivers to cross into the opposing travel
lane to perform overtaking manoeuvres, through the use of broken, wide centreline markings. Care should
be taken to ensure that overtaking is only permitted at appropriate locations.
Factors that should be considered in the implementation of wide centreline treatments include:
• Incident history and crash risk: The treatment should be used where there is a high risk of head-on or
run-off-road type incidents over a minimum section of road.
• Alignment: As some widening may be required, consideration should be given to culverts and bridges.
Taper lengths at these locations should comply with the design speed.
• Signposting structures: As most roads will need to be widened to cater for the minimum width of seal, this
may place existing signs within the clear zone and may require additional protection.
• Services: With the widening of the road, there may be a need to relocate services.
Practitioners should refer to the Guide to Road Design Part 3: Geometric Design (Austroads 2016e) and to
jurisdiction guidance on the use of the application.
Figure 9.2: Wide centreline treatment with wire rope barrier installed
Islands with pavement bars may be applied to the surface of normal road pavement at relatively low cost and
have little or no effect on surface drainage. They provide somewhat better visibility to motorists than do
pavement markings alone, particularly in wet conditions and, where raised pavement bars are used, the
jolting effect is a significant deterrent to vehicle encroachment.
The size and shape of pavement bars need to be carefully designed so that they do not cause a hazard to
motorcyclists and bicyclists. Typically, the height should not be greater than 30 mm and they should be
spaced at a distance greater than the normal wheelbase of motorcycles (approximately 2.0 m). The bars are
usually fixed to the surface of the road with adhesive and may be painted with white or yellow reflective paint.
They should only be used on straight road sections, never on curves because of the hazard they may pose
to motorcyclists.
Where motorcycle and bicycle traffic is significant, or where serious vehicle encroachment over a flush or
painted traffic island is a persistent problem, it may be preferable to use close-spaced raised pavement
markers or to install a conventional kerbed raised-island treatment.
Commercially manufactured low profile pavement bars are currently available in yellow or white plastic.
Some typical arrangements are illustrated in AS 1742.2. Pavement bars should not be installed as a
centreline treatment on two-way carriageways less than 6.8 m in width. Installations of the bars should be
outlined with pavement markings. If the installation is in the form of a median separating opposing directions
of traffic, the outline markings may consist of barrier lines.
These islands may also be provided in other situations, such as medians, where the median lane provided
for traffic from one direction is dedicated to through or turning traffic from the other direction at certain times
of the day.
Moveable medians and islands (i.e. by remote control) are particularly suitable for high traffic volume
situations where it would be disruptive and potentially hazardous for employees if a physical barrier had to be
placed manually.
Figure 9.3: Island that can be moved remotely from a traffic management centre
Movable lane barriers provide a physical barrier and protection where reversal of traffic flow in one or more
lanes is implemented to cater for peak traffic demands (tidal flow). They are usually provided at the ends of
the treatment where there is a higher probability of head-on crashes. This system provides physical
separation and reduces the severity of crashes experienced by other reversible-lane methods (such as
overhead lane signals) in collisions between vehicles travelling in opposite directions.
On high-speed facilities, tidal flow may be managed by the use of a moveable safety barrier, such as the
system adopted for the Auckland Harbour Bridge. Concrete barriers are used to provide a relatively solid
barrier. A specially designed vehicle is used to transfer sections of the barrier to cater for traffic demands.
Deflection of the barrier upon impact is minimised and can be quickly reinstated by the transfer vehicle.
10.1 General
Guidance on traveller information systems commonly used in Australia and New Zealand is provided in
Austroads (2019d). It focuses particularly on systems directed at the provision of information to road users as
part of the traffic operation functions of road agencies. The general purpose in providing road user
information is to influence traveller activities in one or more of the following ways, aimed at more efficient and
safer use of the road network:
• transport mode choice
• route choice
• time-of-travel choice
• driving behaviour
Communication devices in the context of traffic control and management may be defined as those that
convey information or guidance directly to road users while they are actively involved in traffic. Their primary
purpose is to influence road user behaviour in order to improve traffic efficiency and safety.
In addition to the basic devices of signs, signals, markings and delineators, communications which may be
considered under this definition include audio messages by radio and mobile phone, and digital
transmissions via mobile phone, internet and global positioning technologies. In addition, there is a variety of
emerging driver assistance technologies that have potential to deliver much safer vehicles. For applications
that require a response by drivers, it is vital that the human-machine interface is well designed to maximise
effectiveness and ensure that drivers are not overloaded or distracted.
Individual driver behaviours can impact on the efficient and safe operation of a road. For example, driver
decisions relating to the choice of traffic lane, the frequency of lane changing, merging, and travel speed can
potentially affect route capacity and safety. Provision of additional information and guidance directly to
drivers about the following matters can assist in managing the traffic stream:
• lane availability ahead (because of incidents, roadworks or congestion)
• advisory or optimum travel speeds
• likely delays
• suggested alternative routes
As discussed in this chapter ITS technologies and applications are constantly changing. The NIA Framework
(NIAF) associated with the NIA provides a consistent approach to accommodating these changes and will
maximise interoperability between the existing and emerging ITS technologies and applications.
The primary focus of the NIAF approach (and hence NIA) is to help transport designers and operators
understand the operational requirements and information flows that will help inform the selection and use of
ITS technologies and applications, particularly as cooperative and autonomous systems begin to proliferate.
Effective communication with road users, regardless of the delivery method, will ensure that response times
are minimised, behaviours are appropriate and road user safety (a key pillar of the Safe System) is
enhanced. To achieve this, information must be delivered in a way that is:
• clear and concise
• lacks complexity
• does not detract from critical driving tasks
• timely.
These technologies may be adapted to provide information and guidance to road users to encourage
appropriate responses for improved traffic efficiency and safety.
Information on route and traffic conditions can be communicated to motorists en-route via devices including
static road signs, travel-time signs and variable message signs. When conditions change as a result of
incidents, unplanned events or abnormal congestion then additional dynamic, prescriptive and predictive
information is required.
Information may be presented to motorists within a specific radius, or in particular locations such as tunnels.
The information can be sourced in part from automated systems monitoring traffic, road and weather
conditions.
Further details of such information and communication systems, and their use in traffic network operations, is
given in Austroads (2019d).
Radio rebroadcast and CB radio break-in technology can be used to communicate audible messages over
the vehicle’s own radio or CB radio.
As both technologies involve the use of radio communications, Australian practitioners should consult the
Australian Communication Media Authority (ACMA) and New Zealand practitioners should consult the Radio
Spectrum Management (RSM) with respect to conditions of their use. In particular there may be specific
conditions for the use of radio rebroadcast which involves the transmission of information over a frequency
where the person transmitting was not the approved licence holder of the frequency.
Radio rebroadcast
Radio rebroadcast technology may be used where messages may need to be conveyed to all vehicles within
the transmission area that have their radios turned on. The technology is able to override the normal radio
broadcast and relay a traffic-related message to the driver. Most applications of radio rebroadcast technology
are to communicate safety messages about the use of road tunnels (e.g. messages associated with a
change in traffic operation such as a reduced speed limit). Guidance on its use is provided in the Guide to
Road Tunnels Part 2: Planning, Design and Commissioning (Austroads 2015e) and the Guide to Road
Tunnels Part 3: Operation and Maintenance (Austroads 2018). While prepared in the context of road tunnels,
the guidance outlined in Austroads (2018 and 2015e) is also applicable to non-tunnel applications.
In addition to the guidance provided in Austroads (2018 and 2015c), radio rebroadcasts with customised
traffic-related messages are only suitable for applications where potentially all vehicles need to hear the
message, as the message will be broadcast on all radios within the transmission area. For this reason, use
of the technology needs to be carefully considered as road agencies would want to avoid backlash from
drivers who may not need to hear the message or from users of radios not used in the road environment but
still within the transmission area. Use is generally limited to tunnels and to the broadcasting of safety-related
message as the receivers of the message can be controlled and the content of the message is relevant.
CB radio break-in
CB radio break-in can be used to broadcast pre-recorded alert messages over UHF-CB radio. As heavy
vehicles are the main users of CB radio on roads, use of the technology is generally limited to applications
targeting heavy vehicles. The broadcast can be undertaken on any one or multiple channels but in Australia
broadcasts are generally undertaken on the channels used for trucking (i.e. 29 or 40). Applications could be
for general alerts to trucks about roadworks and the need for trucks to adhere to roadwork traffic controls (i.e.
speed, stop/go etc.), however use could also extend to over-height warnings and/or railway level crossings
depending on the trigger. For example, for over-height warnings the trigger would be to detect the truck and
whether it is over height; for level crossings the trigger would be to detect an approaching truck and when the
level crossing becomes active, or to detect when a train is present. Obviously the messages are only
broadcast in the cabin of the truck when the CB radio is on and tuned to the correct channel. It should be
treated as a support tool to standard signage and/or communication devices. Further, any CB radio within
range of the transmission will broadcast the message into the cabin of the truck, so care should be taken
with the content and the aerial and power used in order to limit the transmission range.
Various in-vehicle technologies are emerging that may potentially impact on how drivers and more
specifically vehicles equipped with the emerging technology receive information. This can include connected
technologies such as cooperative intelligent transport systems (C-ITS) which will enable real-time information
to be exchanged between vehicles (V2V), between vehicles and roadside infrastructure (V2I) and between
roadside infrastructure and vehicles (I2V). The information will pertain to the road environment and may
enable benefits to be achieved from both a road user’s and road operator’s perspective. The various benefits
can be categorised into safety, productivity and environmental benefits.
When implementing new traffic control devices, particularly electronic devices such as VMS and traffic
signals, consideration should be given to how these technologies will need to be interoperable with emerging
connected technologies such as C-ITS. This includes how the emerging technology will be interoperable with
the electronic device at the following four levels:
1. Technical level: This includes the hardware/software of systems and platforms that enable
machine-to-machine communication to take place (i.e. the technical ability to wirelessly connect).
2. Syntactical level: This addresses the agreed data formats of communication so that the
machine-to-machine communication can be processed and understood by each machine.
3. Semantic level: This refers to the meaning and interpretation of the content of the communication being
exchanged. Without this interoperability, messages communicated between machines may be
misunderstood and therefore the machine may not be able to use the message to achieve the objective of
it being sent.
4. Organisational level: This encompasses the ability of an organisation to exchange data across systems,
which will require a level of consistency in business processes (and architecture). Success will be
dependent on the level of technical, syntactical and semantic interoperability achieved.
Austroads (2014b) discusses how interoperability can be achieved between C-ITS and ESL, traffic signals
and traveller information systems (including VMS). Practitioners should refer to this source when installing
these devices.
In addition to technologies such as C-ITS, vehicle technologies are also emerging that obtain information by
reading the road and roadside infrastructure and consideration needs to be given to how these technologies
will be able to read signs and linemarking when they emerge. There is a need for traffic control devices to be
implemented where possible in a standardised manner with international practice to enable the emerging
technologies that may be developed internationally to be activated and function locally.
References
Akçelik, R, Besley, M & Roper, R 1999, Fundamental relationships for traffic flows at signalised intersections,
research report ARR 340, ARRB Transport Research, Vermont South, Vic.
Austroads 2006, Guide to road safety part 7: road network crash risk assessment and management,
edn. 1.1, AGRS07-06, Austroads, Sydney, NSW.
Austroads 2008 – 2017, Guide to road design parts 1-8, set, Austroads, Sydney, NSW.
Austroads 2011, Effectiveness and selection of treatments for bicyclists at signalised intersections, AP-R380-
11, Austroads, Sydney, NSW.
Austroads 2012, Effectiveness of road safety engineering treatments, AP-R422-12, Austroads, Sydney,
NSW.
Austroads 2013, Austroads design vehicles and turning path templates, edn. 3.0, AP-G34-13, Austroads,
Sydney, NSW.
Austroads 2014a, Methods for reducing speeds on rural roads: compendium of good practice, AP-R449-14,
Austroads, Sydney, NSW.
Austroads 2014b, C-ITS interoperability with existing ITS infrastructure, AP-R458-14, Austroads, Sydney,
NSW.
Austroads 2014c, National ITS architecture: context and vision, AP-R467-14, Austroads, Sydney, NSW.
Austroads 2014d, National ITS architecture: business architecture, AP-R468-14, Austroads, Sydney, NSW.
Austroads 2015b, Review of sign size for electronic regulatory speed signs, AP-R473-15, Austroads,
Sydney, NSW.
Austroads 2015c, Ability to absorb information through electronic and static signs, AP-R485-15, Austroads,
Sydney, NSW.
Austroads 2015d, Glossary of Austroads terms, 6th edn, AP-C87-15, Austroads, Sydney, NSW.
Austroads 2015e, Guide to road tunnels part 2: planning, design and commissioning, 2nd edn, AGRT02-15,
Austroads, Sydney, NSW.
Austroads 2015f, Improving the performance of safe system infrastructure, AP-R498-15, Sydney, NSW
Austroads 2016a, National ITS architecture, web page, Austroads, Sydney, NSW, viewed 10 June 2016,
<https://austroads.com.au/network-operations/network-management/national-its-architecture>.
Austroads 2016c, Guide to traffic management part 4: network management, edn.4.0, AGTM04-16,
Austroads, Sydney, NSW.
Austroads 2016d, Guide to traffic management part 8: local area traffic management, edn.2.0, AGTM08-16,
Austroads, Sydney, NSW.
Austroads 20016e, Guide to road design part 3: geometric design, edn. 3.2, AGRD03-16, Austroads,
Austroads 2017a, Understanding and improving the safe system intersection performance, AP-R556-17,
Sydney, NSW
Austroads 2017b, Guide to traffic management part 11: parking, edn.2.0, AGTM011-17, Austroads, Sydney,
NSW.
Austroads 2017c, Guide to road design part 4: intersections and crossings: general, edn.2.0, AGRD04-17,
Austroads, Sydney, NSW.
Austroads 2018, Guide to road tunnels part 3: operation and maintenance, edn.2.0, AGRT03-18, Austroads,
Sydney, NSW.
Austroads 2019a, Guide to traffic management part 1: introduction to traffic management, edn.3.1, AGTM01-
19, Austroads, Sydney, NSW
Austroads 2019b, Guide to traffic management part 5: road management, edn.3.1, AGTM05-19, Austroads,
Sydney, NSW.
Austroads 2019c, Guide to traffic management part 6: intersections, interchanges and crossings, edn.3.2,
AGTM06-19, Austroads, Sydney, NSW.
Austroads 2019d, Guide to traffic management part 9: traffic operations, edn.3.1, AGTM09-19, Austroads,
Sydney, NSW.
Austroads 2019e, Guide to road safety part 6A: implementing road safety audit, edn 1.2, AGRS06A-19,
Austroads, Sydney, NSW.
Bennett, DW 2007, ‘Effectiveness evaluations of heavy vehicle speed awareness systems’, contract report
VC73063, ARRB Group, Vermont South, Vic.
Department of Planning, Transport and Infrastructure 2009, Traffic management operational instructions:
audio-tactile linemarking 2.13, DPTI, Adelaide, SA.
Department of Planning, Transport and Infrastructure 2013, Traffic management operational instructions:
pedestrian countdown timer 14.3, DPTI, Adelaide, SA.
Department of Planning, Transport and Infrastructure 2015, Pavement marking manual, DPTI, Adelaide, SA.
Department of Planning, Transport and Infrastructure 2016, web page, Specification: part R49: installation of
signs, DPTI, Adelaide, SA, viewed 10 June 2016,
<http://www.dpti.sa.gov.au/contractor_documents/specifications_-_division_2_roadworks>.
Department of Transport and Main Roads 2001, Manual: design guide for roadside signs, TMR, Brisbane,
Qld, viewed 10 June 2016,
<http://www.tmr.qld.gov.au/~/media/busind/techstdpubs/Road%20planning%20and%20design/Design%2
0Guide%20for%20Roadside%20Signs/Des_Guide_1_Roadside_Signs.pdf>.
Department of Transport and Main Roads 2009, A guide to signing cycle networks: showing the way to more
cycle trips, TMR, Brisbane, Qld, viewed 10 June 2016,
<http://www.tmr.qld.gov.au/~/media/Travelandtransport/Cycling/Bike%20user%20guide/Technical%20info
rmation/Pdf_guide_to_signing_cycle_networks.pdf>.
Department of Transport and Main Roads 2015, Supplement: traffic and road use management: volume 1:
guide to traffic management: part 10: traffic control and communications devices (2009), TMR, Brisbane,
Qld, viewed 10 June 2016,
<http://www.tmr.qld.gov.au/~/media/busind/techstdpubs/Traffic%20management/Traffic%20and%20Road
%20Use%20Management%20manual%20TRUM/Volume%201/Volume1Part10.pdf>.
Donald, D 1995, Making traffic signs work: an overview of design and testing procedures, special report
no. 52, Australian Road Research Board (ARRB), Vermont South, Vic.
Dudek, CL, Trout, N, Booth, S & Ullman, GL 2000, Improved dynamic message sign messages and
operations, research report 1882-2, Texas Transportation Institute, College Station, TX, USA.
Durdin, P, Rendall, S, O’Neil, C and Smith, D 2016, Why are some urban traffic signals much less safe than
others? Research Report 588, New Zealand Transport Agency, Wellington, New Zealand.
Fildes, B, Oxley, J & Corben, B 2001, ‘Older driver road design manual: recommendations and guidelines’,
report for Austroads, Monash University Accident Research Centre (MUARC), Clayton, Vic.
Freeman, KD 1996, ‘Signs and pavement markings’, in KW Ogden & SY Taylor (eds), Traffic engineering
and management, Monash University, Clayton, Vic, pp. 261-77.
Highways Agency 2016a, Design manual for roads and bridges: volume 9: network traffic control and
communications, Highways Agency, London, UK.
Highways Agency 2016b, Design manual for roads and bridges: volume 8: traffic signs and lighting,
Highways Agency, London, UK.
ITE 2006, Preemption of traffic signals near railroad crossings: a recommended practice of the Institute of
Transportation Engineers, ITE, Washington, DC, USA.
Jacobs, RJ & Cole, BL 1978, ‘Acquisition of information from alphanumeric road signs’, Australian Road
Research Board (ARRB) conference, 9th, Brisbane, Queensland, Australian Road Research Board,
Vermont South, Vic, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 390-5.
Kathmann, T & Cannon, R 2001, ‘Guidelines for the use of active speed warning signs in Germany’, Traffic
Engineering and Control, vol. 42, no. 9, pp. 304-7.
MWH 2013, ‘Wide centreline trial crash analysis’, report 80501706-0105, MWH, New Zealand.
Main Roads Western Australia 2007-2016, Bicycle directional signs: parts A-C, MRWA, Perth, WA, viewed
24 June 2016
<https://www.mainroads.wa.gov.au/BuildingRoads/StandardsTechnical/RoadandTrafficEngineering/Traffi
cManagement/pedscycles/Pages/bicyclesigns.aspx>.
Main Roads Western Australia 2015, Guideline for determination of sight distance for direction signs, MRWA,
Perth, WA, viewed 24 June 2016,
<https://www.mainroads.wa.gov.au/BuildingRoads/StandardsTechnical/RoadandTrafficEngineering/Traffi
cManagement/DirectionalSignsGuidelines/Pages/Guideline-for-Determination-of-Sight-Distance-for-
Direction-Signs.aspx>.
NZ Transport Agency 2008, Traffic control devices manual, NZTA, Wellington, New Zealand.
NZ Transport Agency 2010a, Manual of traffic signs and markings (MOTSAM): part 1: traffic signs, NZTA,
Wellington, New Zealand.
NZ Transport Agency 2010b, Manual of traffic signs and markings (MOTSAM): part 2: markings, NZTA,
Wellington, New Zealand.
NZ Transport Agency 2011, Traffic control devices manual: part 2: direction, service and general guidance
signs, NZTA, Wellington, NZ, viewed 24 June 2016 <http://www.nzta.govt.nz/resources/traffic-control-
devices-manual/index.html>.
NZ Transport Agency 2012, Code of practice for temporary traffic management (CoPTTM): part 8 of the
traffic control devices manual (TCD manual), 4th edn, NZTA, Wellington, New Zealand.
NZ Transport Agency 2015, RTS 14: guidelines for facilities for blind and vision impaired pedestrians, 3rd
edn, NZTA, Wellington, New Zealand.
Paniati, JF 2004, Information and action: dynamic message sign (DMS) recommended practice and
guidance, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC, USA.
Roads and Maritime Services 2015, Traffic lights and road markings, web page, RMS, Sydney, NSW, viewed
10 June 2016, <http://www.rms.nsw.gov.au/roads/safety-rules/road-rules/traffic-lights.html>.
Roads and Traffic Authority 2012, Delineation: section 7: traverse lines pedestrian facilities, RMS, Sydney,
NSW, viewed 10 June 2016,
<http://www.rms.nsw.gov.au/business-industry/partners-suppliers/documents/technical-
manuals/delineation/delineationsect7v13_i.pdf>.
Standing Council on Transport and Infrastructure 2012, Policy framework for intelligent transport systems in
Australia, SCOTI, viewed 10 June 2016,
<http://transportinfrastructurecouncil.gov.au/publications/files/ITS_Framework.pdf>.
VicRoads 2001, Traffic engineering manual: volume 2: signs and markings, VicRoads, Kew, Vic.
World Health Organization 2016, Post-crash response: Supporting those affected by road traffic crashes,
World Health Organization (WHO), Geneva, Switzerland
AS/NZS 1428.4.1-2009, Design for access and mobility: means to assist the orientation of people with vision
impairment: tactile ground surface indicators.
AS 1742.1-2014, Manual of uniform traffic control devices: part 1: general introduction and index of signs.
AS 1742.2-2009, Manual of uniform traffic control devices: part 2: traffic control devices for general use.
AS 1742.3-2009, Manual of uniform traffic control devices: part 3: traffic control for works on roads.
AS 1742.5-1997, Manual of uniform traffic control devices: part 5: street name and community facility name
signs.
AS 1742.6-2014, Manual of uniform traffic control devices: part 6: tourist and services signs.
AS 1742.10-2009, Manual of uniform traffic control devices: part 10: pedestrian control and protection.
AS 1742.11-1999, Manual of uniform traffic control devices: part 11: parking controls.
AS 1742.12-2000, Manual of uniform traffic control devices: part 12: bus, transit, tram and truck lanes.
AS 1742.13-2009, Manual of uniform traffic control devices: part 13: local area traffic management.
AS 1742.14-2014, Manual of uniform traffic control devices: part 14: traffic signals.
AS 1742.15-2007, Manual of uniform traffic control devices: part 15: direction signs, information signs and
route numbering.
AS/NZS 1906.1-2017, Retroreflective materials and devices for road traffic control purposes: retroreflective
sheeting.
AS/NZS 1906.2-2007 (R2018), Retroreflective materials and devices for road traffic control purposes:
retroreflective devices (non-pavement application).
AS/NZ 1906.3-2017, Retroreflective materials and devices for road traffic control purposes: raised pavement
markers (retroreflective and non-retroreflective).
AS/NZS 1906.4-2010, Retroreflective materials and devices for road traffic control purposes: high- visibility
materials for safety garments.
AS 2342-1992 (R2013), Development, testing and implementation of information and safety symbols and
symbolic signs.
AS/NZS 2890.6-2009, Parking facilities: off-street parking for people with disabilities.
AS 4049.1-2005 (R2016), Paints and related materials: pavement marking materials: solvent-borne paint: for
use with surface applied glass beads.
AS 4049.2-2005 (R2016), Paints and related materials: pavement marking materials: thermoplastic
pavement marking materials: for use with surface applied glass beads.
AS 4049.3-2005 (R2016), Paints and related materials: pavement marking materials: waterborne paint: for
use with surface applied glass beads.
AS 4049.4-2006 (R2016), Paints and related materials: pavement marking materials: high performance
pavement marking systems.
A.1 Introduction
The active transport and recreational needs of communities are efficiently served by the development of
regional and local networks of interconnected cycling routes linking major trip origins to destinations. The
planning of these networks is undertaken by government agencies and local governments as part of regional
and municipal bike plans.
Directional signs provide wayfinding and informational guidance for bicyclists across these cycle networks.
These guidelines deal only with directional signs for cycling routes (both on- and off-road) within a cycling
network. They do not cover the many other aspects of cycling network signs and markings, such as
regulatory and warning signs, linemarking, regulatory pavement symbols and behaviour signs for which there
are separate guidelines (Table A 1).
Contents References
Australian Standard AS 1742.9 Manual of Uniform Traffic Control
Regulatory, warning, advisory and directional Devices Part 9: Bicycle Facilities
signs. Linemarking and pavement symbols NZ Traffic Control Devices Manual Part 2: Direction, Service and
General Guidance Signs (NZ Transport Agency 2011)
Design, layout and dimensioning of Australian Standard AS 1743 Road Signs: Specifications
individual directional signs
Austroads Bicycle Wayfinding Publication No. AP-R492-15,
Austroads (2015a)
Queensland Transport and Main Roads, A Guide to Signing Cycle
Networks Department of Transport and Main Roads (2009)
Detailed directional sign planning, installation (available for download from the TMR website: www.tmr.qld.gov.au)
guidance and resources Main Roads Western Australia guidance on Bicycle Direction Signs
(Main Roads Western Australia 2007–16) outlined in three parts:
• Part A: Policy Statement
• Part B: Application and Approval Guidelines
• Part C: Technical Guidelines
These guidelines are designed to assist road designers, engineers and transport planners to provide high
quality, professional and consistent directional signs for cycle networks across Australian and New Zealand
cities and towns. Directional signs enable riders to use cycle networks to their full potential and make quick
and accurate route choices.
The purpose of the signs is to provide wayfinding and directional assistance for bicyclists using routes which
comprise a wide range of facilities, some of which may be shared with motorists or pedestrians. Directional
signs have no regulatory purpose or intent and do not imply an exclusive use by bicyclists of paths shared
with pedestrians or streets shared with drivers. In practice, care should always be taken to ensure that
directional signs are fully supported by regulatory signs relevant to the street/path facilities that comprise the
cycle route.
In the interests of uniformity, local governments and private sector large-scale landowners are encouraged to
apply these guidelines when installing directional signs for cycling route facilities on streets, roads and paths
under their control. To assist cycle network providers with the implementation of the guidelines, the
Queensland Transport and Main Roads resource manual, A Guide to Signing Cycle Networks (Department
of Transport and Main Roads 2009), is recommended. This publication contains additional information and
advice on the practical aspects and processes involved in the installation of cycle network directional sign
systems.
The guidelines are intended to supplement guidance on directional signs for cycling networks described in
Section 5 of Australian Standard AS 1742 Part 9: Bicycle Facilities, Australian Standard AS 1743 Road
Signs: Specifications and the NZ Traffic Control Devices Manual Part 2: Direction, Service and General
Guide Signs (TCDM-2) (NZ Transport Agency 2011). The guidelines replace directional sign guidance
previously provided in Austroads Guides and are intended to provide uniform guidance for Australian and
New Zealand jurisdictions. In each jurisdiction, additional guideline supplements may apply and practitioners
should consult them to determine the most appropriate sign implementation.
Cyclists are legally defined as vehicles and can use public roads unless specifically prohibited for operational
safety reasons (e.g. urban motorways). The lack of cycling infrastructure along a route, such as cycle-lane
markings, regulatory and warning signs and bicycle pavement symbols, does not necessarily mean that the
route is unsuitable for cycling.
It is noted that bicyclists have differing levels of competency and sensitivity to traffic. Experienced bicyclists
will often prefer unmarked, wide, kerb-side traffic lanes to marked cycling/car parking lanes due to their close
proximity to opening car doors. Others (such as children, new adult riders and the elderly) may prefer to
avoid trafficked roads altogether and ride off-road.
Fitting a route with a system of directional signs provides all bicyclists with important wayfinding information
which helps them to more effectively use their bicycles for a wide range of local and regional trips. Without
these signs it is difficult for them to take full advantage of the road system and to use their bicycles as an
efficient means of transport.
On routes where off-road cycling facilities are provided, the needs of on-road bicyclists are always
considered. This may often mean the installation of additional signs at junctions or turning points to address
the separate cycling travel paths of each group.
There are eight types of cycle directional signs and a set of directional pavement indicators used on cycle
networks. Each route type has its own family of signs consisting of some or all of these sign types. Pavement
markings can be used on all route types for wayfinding guidance.
The various types of bicycle wayfinding signs as detailed in Austroads (2015a) are outlined in Table A 2.
Included is the type, description and example of each of these sign types.
Advance direction Advance direction signs are used to indicate the destination
signs choices in advance of a route junction. They are used on
veloways and primary routes at junctions with other veloways
or primary routes. They can be used on veloways or primary
routes at junctions with local or tourist/recreational routes if
those routes are of importance and connect to a major trip
attractor relevant to cycle traffic on the primary route.
Note: Practitioners are advised to refer to the most up-to-date standards and/or guidelines when considering using the
signs.
Route directional pavement markings (Figure A 1) indicate on-road route turns to warn cyclists of on- to
off-road transitions which may be difficult to see from a distance or at speed. Directional pavement markings
are a useful aid to navigation and provide an important supporting role to signs. The pavement markings can
be used on all types of route as an aid to navigation.
Cycle networks consist of five distinct route types: veloways, primary, local, tourist/recreational and long-term
detours. Each route type (Table A 3) uses a different combination of sign types appropriate to the needs of
the route within the overall network hierarchy. Design details for each sign type, including sign variations and
recommended usage, are provided in Austroads (2015a).
Table A 3: Cycle routes and the sign types used on each route type
Route types
Sign types
Tourist/ Long-term
Veloway Primary Local
recreational detours
High-speed, Long-term detour
limited-access The main arterial Shorter routes Off-road, shared routes for
Route type routes usually routes of urban connecting path and veloways,
description paralleling major cycle transport primary routes to tourist/recreation primary or
arterial roads or networks local destinations al routes tourist/recreation
motorways al routes
Yes, at junctions Yes, at junctions
with other routes with other routes
Yes, integrated
Fingerboards and where the and where the Yes Yes
with street signs
route changes route changes
direction direction
Yes, at junctions Yes, at junctions
Direction with other routes with other routes
No, use markers No, use markers
indication and where the and where the Yes
instead instead
signs route changes route changes
direction direction
Yes, before route
Advance
junctions with Yes, before route No, use markers No, use markers
direction No
veloways or junctions instead instead
signs
primary routes
Yes, after route
Reassurance Only on lengthy
junctions with No, use markers No, use markers
signs with remote routes for No
other veloways or instead instead
distances reassurance
primary routes
Route No, use direction No, use direction No, use direction
Yes Yes
markers indication signs indication signs indication signs
Yes, if route
Route replaced by
Yes Yes No Yes
numbering detour is already
numbered
Route
Yes Yes No Yes No
branding
Street signs Yes, if none exist Yes, if none exist Yes, if none exist Yes, if none exist Yes, if none exist
The methodology recommended in these guidelines for planning and implementing cycling sign projects is
similar to other transport systems such as highway and arterial road signs. A key requirement is that routes
are planned and signed within the context of the surrounding regional cycle network. This planning enables
routes to be fully signed indicating the full range of destinations available across a region rather than within a
narrow corridor.
The following steps for developing a directional sign plan are outlined in the following sections:
• Document the current (and planned) cycle routes (Appendix A.5.1).
• Create (or update) the focal point map for the region (Appendix A.5.2).
• Document any facilities which will need to be named on signs (Appendix A.5.3).
• Document any route numbering which will be required on signs (Appendix A.5.4).
• Document any route branding which will be required on signs (Appendix A.5.5).
• Conduct a pre-sign, risk assessment survey (Appendix A.5.6).
• Document all junctions with other routes (Appendix A.5.7).
• Prepare a sign schedule covering the route (Appendix A.5.8).
• Prepare a sign artwork files for the sign manufacturer (Appendix A.5.9).
When considering cycling routes for sign projects, it is essential to differentiate between cycle routes and
cycling facilities. Cycle routes are continuous connections which facilitate travel within an area served by the
cycling network. Each cycling route can consist of many types of cycling facilities from on-road lanes and
separated off-road cycleways within the road corridor to low-traffic-volume local streets with little or no
linemarking or explicit cycling facilities.
The lack of defined regulatory cycling facilities and engineering treatments such as bicycle lanes and paths
should not prevent the installation of directional signs along a designated route providing that the usual road
safety and traffic management practices are followed. A cycle route only has to be assessed as legally
rideable for it to be considered for signing.
The planning phase for signing cycle networks and their component routes is only concerned with cycle
routes. The type and existence of cycling facilities is a key consideration in the implementation phase of a
sign project, as the precise siting of any directional signs should be directly influenced by the facilities.
The first stage in developing a sign plan is to identify all interconnecting cycle routes and the destination
names (focal points) used on these routes which should be included on signs. For example, at a junction of
two primary routes, the advance direction signs on each approach will list the next focal point for the route
being followed and those for each intersecting route. At route junctions, fingerboards for other intersecting
routes are usually installed at a later stage when the full sequence of signs is being installed.
When planning and designing directional signs for cycling routes utilising a network approach, designers first
need to determine the destination and decision points (route junctions) for each route within the network.
These details can then be used for single- or multiple-route sign projects. The key tool for the coordinated
development of directional sign systems for cycling is the focal point map for a region.
A focal point map is a planning document used by the cycle network’s manager to establish the destinations
which appear on directional signs for the network. A key aim is to achieve rigid consistency in the use of
named destinations so that a coherent system of signs can be developed to enable direct and unambiguous
navigation around the cycle network. Only those destinations appearing on the focal point map are used on
cycle network signs.
This map is usually maintained by a government authority responsible for the regional cycle network. This
could be a centrally located council working in consultation with the road agency and neighbouring councils.
As cycle networks are more urban-oriented than the main road network, they may use different focal points
to highway/arterial road focal point maps within the same area or region.
The following guidelines apply to focal point mapping methodology for cycle networks. Further details can be
found in Austroads (2015a):
• Focal points are significant destinations within a region where routes join, cross or terminate. They are
indicated in the focal point map by a solid disc symbol. At complex junctions where routes overlap or
cross, small red arrows are sometimes used on the map to clarify the paths for each route. For an urban
cycle network, it is recommended that focal points be spaced at approximately 5 km.
• Terminal destinations are focal points where routes terminate. This may lie beyond any junction with
another route or where a route terminates by joining another route at a T-junction etc.
• Sub-destinations are important intermediate centres along a route. To keep sign content compact, only
one sub-destination is listed with the next focal point destination until the sub-destination is reached.
• In areas where a focal point is needed but is not immediately apparent, the focal point map designer
consults with stakeholders to determine the most appropriate destination name to include on route
direction signs.
City centre focal points are used in large and complex metropolitan CBDs where many routes converge but
do not intersect neatly at a single junction. A city centre focal point is usually defined as a small area
encompassing all route junctions with a compact geographical area. Primary routes leading to the city centre
are considered to have reached it when they are at the defined boundary even though this may be a
distance from the actual geographical centre of the city. The destination wording (used for the particular city
centre) should continue to be used on signs between the boundary edge and the geographical centre. It is
usual practice to list any destinations on the opposite side of the city centre which that route may connect
with and continue onto. This practice further assists with route-finding within a complex area.
Veloways, primary and tourist/recreational cycle routes may occasionally use all, or sections of, path facilities
which have been named by a local council or government agency. The use of cycle facility names on cycle
route signs should be kept to a minimum as it can place heavy demands on available sign space often
increasing the physical size of signs and does not necessarily improve wayfinding.
Veloway and primary route signs can include facility name indication as follows:
• Facility name indication is limited to the start and finish of the named facility or at junctions where other
primary routes enter the facility.
• The length of a facility name sign or integrated facility name box should not exceed the length of the
associated route sign. Lengthy facility names are abbreviated or the facility name shown using the more
condensed AS 1744 Series C typeface.
• On veloways and major primary routes, the names of significant intersecting streets/roads (route exit
points) may be shown on signs using a similar layout.
In densely populated cities where there are far more route options than in smaller centres, route numbering
may make it considerably easier for users to navigate their way around the cycle network. Route numbering
may also be appropriate on longer-distance (inter-city) routes as numbered routes can extend across an
entire metropolitan or city area.
Adoption of a system of cycle route numbering is sanctioned by the appropriate authorities responsible for
the cycle network within a city, region or state. Planning and maintenance of the cycle route numbering
system is the additional responsibility of an inter-governmental group or agency/jurisdiction which maintains
the focal point map for the cycle network within the city/region. If route numbering is sanctioned, the
numbering system is applied consistently on all network directional signs within the region.
Veloway, primary and tourist/recreational route signs can include route numbering indication as follows:
• Route numbering can be used on signs and markers.
• Route numbers can be associated with a single destination, a group of destinations or a route.
• Route numbering and route branding are separate systems with potentially overlapping segments.
Longer tourist/recreational routes are being developed in many Australian and New Zealand communities.
Part of the implementation of these routes, which may often pass through a number of local government
areas, is the application of a common branding and promotional identity which often encompasses design
elements such as a branding logo, specialist wayfinding and facilities sign designs.
Veloway, primary and tourist/recreational route signs can include route branding indication as follows:
• Logos are the preferred method of branding. Logos use a simplified design and are instantly
recognisable.
• Cycle route branding can be integrated into sign designs or installed as a separate sign above or below
fingerboards. When an external route branding sign is used with a fingerboard for the same route, the
branding sign is mounted above the fingerboard. If an external route branding sign is installed with a
fingerboard for an overlapping primary or tourist/recreational route, the external branding sign is fixed
below the fingerboard.
• Route numbering always takes precedence over route branding.
• Route branding and route numbering are separate systems with potentially overlapping segments. When
branding logos are used on the same destination line as route numbers, the route number indicator is
positioned next to the destination name.
Prior to the installation of directional signs on a cycle route it is recommended that a physical risk
assessment of the route is made. This assessment will study the route to determine if it can be legally
cycled. The condition of existing cycle facilities on and off road, intersections/crossing points and any critical
safety issues will be noted. Where major deficiencies occur in the permanent infrastructure (one-way streets
preventing two-way cycle access, off-road sections where cycling is not permitted, continuous medians
preventing route turns etc.) remedial action will be recommended and carried out prior to sign installation.
The type and extent of remedial work will usually depend on the structure of the road environment and the
availability of any bicycle-specific treatments and infrastructure. Recommendations for pre-sign
risk-assessment procedures are provided in the Queensland Transport and Main Roads publication A Guide
to Signing Cycle Networks Department of Transport and Main Roads (2009) (search title on the TMR website
www.tmr.qld.gov.au).
Figure A 2 to Figure A 5 show recommended intersection sign layouts for the four route types: veloways,
primary, local and tourist/recreational routes. The examples show usage of various bicycle wayfinding
signage referred to in the previous sections. Due to the complexity of intersections it may often be advisable
to use a graphical presentation for advance direction signs.
Note: Practitioners are advised to refer to the most up-to-date standards and/or guidelines when considering using the
signs.
Note: Practitioners are advised to refer to the most up-to-date standards and/or guidelines when considering using the
signs.
Note: Practitioners are advised to refer to the most up-to-date standards and/or guidelines when considering using the
signs.
Note: Practitioners are advised to refer to the most up-to-date standards and/or guidelines when considering using the
signs.
A sign schedule (detailing the location, type and lettering) is the key reference document used to specify the
content and location of all signs in the project. Typical details included in a sign schedule are:
• Contents for all signs in the project (including destinations, distances and direction arrows). To determine
which destinations to show on advance direction signs for intersecting routes, refer to the focal point map
which lists all destinations applicable for each route.
• Precise location of each sign. It is recommended that marked-up site photos, detailed site maps or
diagrams be appended to the sign schedule to ensure an accurate communication with the sign installer
for each sign’s particular siting requirements.
• Mounting details/requirements (new pole, existing poles, modifications to existing, fixing type etc.).
• New signs found necessary by the site assessment – missing regulatory signs, services and facilities
signs, signs indicating connecting paths to the street system, additional signs at junctions for separate
on- or off-road facilities and street name signs at junctions and route turns.
• Redundant signs to be removed.
• Additional works required to fully install the signs (minor tree pruning and branch removal where
vegetation obscures signs when installed).
The completed route sign schedule can then be used to manufacture the signs. The first stage of this
process is to transfer the information in the sign schedule into electronic artwork for each sign. This work is
usually undertaken ‘in-house’ by the sign manufacturer or by an external graphic artist.
It is recommended that the sign project designer/planner recheck all electronic sign layouts for accuracy prior
to sign fabrication. Sign layouts should conform to the sign layout templates in Australian Standard AS 1743.
Often it is not possible to indicate a simple path through a road intersection due to the size and location of
the roads through the junction and the complexity of the intersection layout. This is particularly an issue when
routes transition between on- and off-road facilities at large multi-laned, signalised intersections. Appendix B
of Austroads (2015a) provides examples of how to provide bicycle wayfinding through a complex
intersection.
The manufactured signs can be installed according to the sign schedules and detailed siting instructions
provided by the sign system planner/designer. Additional advice and recommendations on sign installation
issues are provided below.
Signs are mounted in full view of bicyclists using the cycle route, and located so that they provide clear,
unambiguous directions at critical turning points or junctions. Care is needed to place signs where they can
be clearly seen by bicyclists and in a location where their message is not compromised or overwhelmed by
proximity to other road signs or structures.
Cycle network signs should be sited so that they do not diminish the effectiveness of, or conflict with, existing
road signs and create ambiguity for other road users.
Cycle network signs, like highway signs, are a discrete system designed to guide bicyclists through often
complex road environments. Cycle route signs are not included with, or mounted on, main/arterial road
directional signs or sign supports. Cycle route directional messages are not included or integrated into
main/arterial road signs.
Sign clutter should be minimised by utilising existing sign and street poles where this does not compromise
the effectiveness of the direction or host signs. Mounting on existing power poles is permissible provided that
the council or road agency has an arrangement with the power utility to sanction this. In urban environments
some councils permit the co-use of parking sign poles as a clutter reduction measure.
Signs should be mounted at a clearance height of 2.5 m and preferably no higher than 4.0 m. Sign supports
need a minimum of 0.5 m clearance from the cycleway or roadway. Do not mount signs so that they
overhang the roadway or interfere with turning vehicles.
Where there is a risk that signs could be rotated by either wind or vandalism, use anti-rotational fittings or
fixing screws can be used. This is particularly important on fingerboard signs which indicate travel direction
at intersections.
Map and information display signs need to be mounted with sufficient horizontal clearance (1.5 m minimum,
2.0 m preferred) to permit bicyclists and other path users to comfortably view the sign and still provide
clearance to other street/path users.
Route markers for tourist/recreational routes on rural routes are placed at 5 km maximum spacing and
generally located on existing sign posts or new route marker posts where there are no existing sign posts.
Spacing may be increased to 10 km along off-road paths or other remote routes where there are limited or
no intersecting roads/paths along the route. In urban environments, markers should be placed on continuous
or branded recreational routes at 1 km intervals increasing to 2 km where there are no intermediate
junctions.
At cycle route junctions/decision points, directional signs need to be positioned so that bicyclists can safely
read the signs and comfortably follow their chosen route. Stopping distance and the sight distance to the
intersection are also important in hilly conditions.
When placing advance direction signs it is essential to take into account all local variables such as slope and
sight distances. Signs should be located to provide adequate warning of a change of direction depending on
the site. Table B.9 in Austroads (2015a) lists recommended mounting distances for advance direction signs.
If two signs indicating separate directions cannot be mounted on the same pole on one corner of an
intersection due to site conditions, separate mounting of the signs should be considered. This also applies to
mounting signs on existing sign or power poles (where an agreement exists between the road/street/path
owning authority and the power supply company) provided that such mounting offers superior sight lines and
visibility for the sign(s).
Direction signs need to be easily readable in either day or night conditions. Signs located in a normal urban
environment usually have adequate ambient lighting. If possible, signs should be located under, or adjacent
to, overhead lighting.
At major junctions it is important to place fingerboards in a logical vertical order so that bicyclists can easily
follow the signs for a particular route. Generally, fingerboard pairs for a continuous route through a junction
are placed together in the vertical sign stack. Ideally fingerboard pairs for the same route are mounted at the
same level but this may not be possible due to mounting system limitations. Always consider sign visibility
from different approaches for large sign installations when multiple routes pass through junctions.
Many local governments are implementing wayfinding sign systems to assist people using shared paths and
urban greenways. Many of these paths have been developed with unique signs and branding. Cycle network
signs installed as an overlay on existing paths (with existing signs) require careful sign placement to ensure
the needs of path users and the cycle network are fully accommodated.
Existing path signs should provide the necessary destinations, distances, directions to facilities,
cross-street/access-path naming and map signs. Off-road paths and path junctions are signed the same as
on-road routes. Where no existing path sign system is in place, normal cycle network signs are applied
throughout the path.
Following installation, the location and sign contents are finally checked on site by the sign system
planner/designer. All signs need to point in the right direction and be easily visible to bicyclists riding the
route. Signs wrongly installed or containing inaccurate information need to be documented and supplied to
the sign installer for rectification.
Cycle network direction signs can be installed during the implementation phase of a cycleway project or
retrofitted as part of a longer-term program for high quality wayfinding and directional sign systems across a
cycle network.
The maintenance of cycle route direction signs is usually the responsibility of the government agency, local
government or private landowner that owns or operates the road, street or path. It is important that ongoing
sign maintenance responsibilities be assigned and carried out, particularly where joint funding and
partnership arrangements have installed the signs and infrastructure. Any ongoing maintenance of cycle
network infrastructure needs to include the maintenance of the sign system.
Asset managers/owners are increasingly interested in accurate reporting systems which allow them to more
efficiently maintain infrastructure such as cycling network directional signs.
Internet-based infrastructure defect reporting systems are currently used by a number of Australian and New
Zealand councils and government agencies. It is important that these systems be accessible to the bicyclists
who regularly use the network to ensure prompt reporting of missing or damaged signs. This type of
reporting system is recommended as it encourages network users to report faults which may otherwise take
much longer to detect under the asset authority’s regular maintenance inspections.
It is essential that asset items relating to cycling signs be added to existing internet-based defect reporting
systems as soon as directional signs are installed so that users may make an accurate selection from the
reportable faults listed on the system.
Alternative sign design options include providing travel time and shared route markings. Detailed guidance
on these marking is outlined in Appendix B of Austroads (2015a).
This Appendix outlines guidance used by Main Roads Western Australia (2015) to determine the sight
distance to direction signs. Practitioners may consider this guidance for application within their jurisdictions.
Vegetation in the road verge can often obscure the visibility of direction signs and other large road signs and
must be maintained to ensure that adequate visibility is available. These guidelines have been prepared to
determine the extent of pruning or clearing of the vegetation that is necessary to achieve the required sight
distances.
With reference to Figure B 1 and Figure B 2, the sight distance to the direction sign is measured along the
road from point at which the whole sign is visible to the driver. For multi-lane roads, the sign is to be viewed
from the lane closest to the road verge. It is assumed that the driver's eye height is 1.10 m and that the driver
is located in the center of the lane.
Minimum sight distance requirements can be determined in Figure B 3 and Figure B 4 using the approach
speed and the number of words or symbols (excluding arrows) on the sign. The approach speed should be
taken as the posted speed limit of the road or the normal operating speed on roads which have not been
speed zoned.
The graph in Figure B 3 should be used to determine the desirable minimum sight distance to the sign. If the
measured sight distance is less than the minimum sight distance, tree pruning or clearing of low vegetation is
required.
Sight distances given in Figure B 4 should only be used where the sight distance determined from Figure B 3
cannot be achieved without extensive clearing or because the visibility of the sign is obscured by a road
embankment. The sign should be relocated if the minimum requirement in Figure B 4 cannot be achieved.
The following is a list of acceptable abbreviations for frequently used words. Abbreviations may be used on
VMS messages but where possible should be avoided.
The following abbreviations are easily understood whenever they appear in conjunction with a word
commonly associated with it (prompt word). The prompt word can appear before or after the abbreviated
word depending on the meaning. For example, RT is alternatively recognised as either ‘right’ or ‘route’ based
on the prompt word.
* Name/number is optional, to be used only when there could be confusion as to which bridge or exit is closed.
Frame 1 Frame 2
Frame 1 Frame 2
Commentary 1
Frangible supports are designed to collapse on impact. The severity of potential injuries to the occupants of
an impacting vehicle is reduced, compared to injuries that could occur if the posts were unyielding.
Jurisdictions provide different guidance for frangible posts. Practitioners should refer to the jurisdiction guidance
in addition to Austroads Guide to Road Design Parts 6 and 6B, and the Guide to Road Safety Part 9.
Outlined below are examples of differing jurisdictional guidance for frangible posts.
MRWA provides the following guidance for frangible post selection (based on grade 350 steel):
• For roads with a speed limit less than 60 km/h the size of the circular hollow section (CHS) post must not
be greater than 101.6 CHS 2.6 (the first figure is the diameter while the second figure following CHS is
the wall thickness).
• For roads with a speed limit of 60, 70 or 80 km/h the size of the CHS post must not be greater than 76.1
CHS 2.3.
• For roads with a speed limit greater than 80 km/h the size of the CHS post must not be greater than 60.3
CHS 2.9.
• If a three-post installation is to be used the two outer posts must be more than 2.1 m apart.
• The maximum size universal beam (UB) considered frangible when fitted with a breakaway base is the
250 UB 37.
• Signs located in positions where the impact may come from two directions at 90° to one another should
not be supported on universal beam posts.
• The minimum clearance height for signs supported on slip base UB posts should be 2.2 m. This
clearance is required to enable a vehicle to pass underneath the unsupported portion of a sign, once the
post is struck by an errant vehicle, without the sign penetrating the windscreen. For signs located on a
batter, this clearance applies to the post closest to the roadway.
DPTI provides the following guidance for post selection based on sign size.
Small to medium size signs (i.e. general regulatory or warning type) should be supported by steel rectangular
hollow section (RHS) supports complying with Table C1 1. Circular hollow sections (CHS) should not be
used for small to medium size signs under any circumstances.
Post size
Post length (mm)
width x depth x wall thickness (mm)
≤ 3200 75 x 38 x 3.0 or 80 x 40 x 1.6
> 3200 to ≤ 4200 80 x 40 x 2.5
Except for overhead signs, steel CHS supports (nominal 100 mm diameter) should be used where
non-frangible posts are permitted.
The contractor may apply for approval of a proprietary frangible post not included in the approved products
list. Any request for approval of a post must include all necessary supporting information and will constitute a
‘hold point’.
The contractor acknowledges that for efficiency of maintenance, the principal requires that the number of
types of proprietary frangible posts on the road network is kept to a minimum. The principal reserves the right
to withhold approval of any proprietary frangible posts at discretion.
Further to the above, it is noted that overhead signs must be supported by cantilever, gantry or portal type
structures.
Roads ACT provides guidance on what posts are considered frangible, as outlined in Table C1 3.
If the post requires a greater design moment then a frangible post should be used. Frangible post systems
should be approved by the road agency. Roads ACT refers to guidance outlined in the Department of
Transport and Main Roads (2001), summarised below:
The function of breakaway supports is to support the sign under normal wind load conditions, yet fail in a
relatively safe manner when struck by a vehicle as shown in Figure C1 1.
Breakaway supports are fabricated using rectangular hollow sections RHS or CHS steel tube with both a slip
base plate and a fuse plate hinge (except for single-post signs). Failure occurs when the vehicle impact force
overcomes the frictional force between the base plate and tension tearing of the fuse plate weld. Breakaway
support details are designed to accommodate the impact from both traffic directions, to cater for use in
median strip and gore areas.
The slip base and fuse plate details are not required for small posts, which are considered to be frangible in
collisions (refer to Figure C1 2).
Likely collision speed (km/h) Post size, nominal bore (NB) (mm)
< 60 100
60 to 80 80
> 80 65
Galvanised steel pipe posts up to 65 NB will rarely cause injury to the occupants of cars or heavier vehicles
which collide with them. The same applies to low-speed urban type conditions involving steel pipe up to
approximately 100 NB (RHS 75 x 50). For RHS, 75 x 50 posts may be considered as frangible.
Consideration should be given to the use of an additional post that may reduce the required post size to
within the frangible limits. Increasing the number of posts is not a valid method for resultant post spacing less
than 1.5 m, due to the increased likelihood of collision with two posts.
To maximise road safety and minimise cost, the intention should always be to locate signs in ‘low risk’
regions where breakaway posts are not required.
‘High risk’ regions are those within the clear zone which are not protected by a barrier device or steep slope.
Breakaway posts should be avoided where secondary incidents involving the impacting vehicle or dislodged
pole and sign are significant. This is particularly relevant in urban areas where pedestrians may be struck by
falling pieces.
The standard design of large signs, usually situated within the clear zone, incorporates breakaway details in
the truss support system.
To achieve satisfactory performance of the breakaway supports, the following criteria should be met:
• The clearance of the sign above the ground should be a minimum of 2.1 m to avoid penetration of an
impacting vehicle windscreen.
• Proper functioning of the slip base depends on control of clamping pressure between the base plates
produced by bolt tensioning. It is important for the specified bolt torque to be adhered to. The drawings
specify shop assembly of slip bases, to minimise the inaccuracies of torque-controlled bolt tensioning.
Pre-assembled slip bases will also enable supports to be plumbed prior to pouring concrete footings.
• Large truss supports will often be difficult to erect prior to pouring footings. It is therefore desirable to cast
in the stub and then assemble the slip base on site. Special attention must be given to the tensioning on
site, with calibrated torque wrenches used and bolt threads kept clean.
• For CHS/RHS posts, the fuse plate hinges have been designed to resist 45% of the post-moment
capacity. Signs with panel height greater than 165% of the clearance between the ground and sign
produce a bending moment which exceeds the fuse plate hinge capacity. For these signs the post size
should be increased to the next section size. The allowable panel height is then twice the clearance.
For truss supports, the fuse plate hinges have been designed to resist 66% of the axial compression capacity
of their CHS posts/legs. Signs with panel height greater than 400% of the clearance between the ground and
sign, produce an axial force which exceeds the fuse plate hinge capacity. For these signs, the truss size
could be increased to the next available size.
The Design Guide for Roadside Signs (Department of Transport and Main Roads 2001) as currently referred
to by Roads ACT (refer to Commentary C1.3) is considered outdated and is currently under review by the
department. At present TMR refers to Table D2 of AS 1742.2.
[Back to body text]
Commentary 2
It will normally be necessary to determine the details and condition of signs along the route as part of the
development of a route overview plan. An inventory of existing signs should be undertaken to provide a basis
for determining the extent to which existing signs can be accommodated in a revised signing scheme.
The information required may be collected or available through a formal asset management system that may
be computer based. However, the following items will be useful in collecting data and records should a
formal automated system not exist:
• camera (should be able to be manually focused, no permanent flash unit, preferably with variable focal
length lens)
• measuring device for use in photographs, can be a survey staff
• tape measure
• distance measuring device to determine longitudinal location of sign
• intersection layout proformas or pad of plain paper to sketch sign layouts at intersections
• strip map
• sign inventory data, where available
• designs for existing signs along the route, where available
• colour/material class swatch samples
• stringline level
• copy of relevant standard drawings for road signs.
The use of a proforma such as the sign inventory form shown in Figure C2 1 is recommended.
– Complete the comment section on the form, noting especially details such as inappropriate location of
a sign or sign assembly, conflict with other traffic devices, signs obscured due to trees or other local
features, and any other comments that are relevant to the site. If necessary, photographs or sketches
may be used to illustrate the comments.
– Additional photographs (i.e. rear of sign) may be required if sign-mounting arrangements are not
standard.
• Assemble inventory sheets (sign inventory proformas) and other data, match photographs, and mount
photographs on inventory sheets. Ensure that all data pertaining to a sign is cross-referenced to
additional information that may have been collected.
Commentary 3
The following information is based on guidance provided by the Department of Transport and Main Roads
(2015) for the implementation of traverse rumble strips.
Rumble strips are to be reserved only for those rare locations where standard signing treatments do not (or
are not expected to) provide adequate safety.
Rumble strips are transverse strips in the pavement, either raised above the pavement or grooves formed in
the pavement, which give an audible and tactile sensation to the driver of a vehicle passing over them. They
are placed so that the increased noise, vibration and occupant discomfort associated with the high speed of
travelling over the strips will encourage drivers to reduce the speed of their vehicles.
The creation of rumble strips is achieved either by forming grooves in the pavement (hot asphalt) or grinding
the existing pavement, or by the application of a raised tacked-on strip of rough pavement material
constructed generally using a spray seal. An alternative to using spray seal is the application of recycled
rubber rumple strips with standard module sizes of 1500 mm long, 600 mm wide, and 60 mm high.
Raised strips formed by spray seals are the preferred method for use at approaches to hazards or
intersections. For temporary usage, recycled rubber rumble strips should be considered.
Rumble strips can also be used as a countermeasure for driver fatigue. However, the configuration and
location need to be carefully considered and designed.
Prior to installing rumble strips, the following signing options should be considered:
• increased level of signing on the approaches by duplicating the recommended signs on both sides of the
road
• provision of edge lines
• installation of retroreflective raised pavement markers to supplement separation lines and edge lines
• increased size of the recommended signs (and hazard markers where applicable)
• use of reduce speed signs. These should only be used where there is considerable danger to the motorist
if this sign is disobeyed.
The above measures may be combined to achieve the desired level of warning. If the highest practicable
level of signing still fails to produce a satisfactory result, the installation of rumble strips may be considered in
conjunction with a high level of signing.
A high level of signing alone is generally more effective and less expensive than low-level signing with
rumble strips.
The spacing of traverse rumble strips that should be used is that of a converging pattern of transverse strips
placed so that a decelerating vehicle will strike the strips at a constant time interval of not less than 0.5
second. This requires about 20 strips for deceleration from 100 to 25 km/h.
Accordingly, it is recommended that a pattern of up to 10 strips should be used so that a strip is struck each
second while decelerating at a comfortable rate.
Example traverse rumble strip configurations, including spacing, on the approach to an intersection for 100,
80 and 60 km/h approaches are shown in Figure C3 1, Figure C3 2 and Figure C3 3 respectively.
Figure C3 4 provides an example of a traverse rumble strip configuration used in fatigue zones. It is
important that fatigue zone rumble strips be accompanied by appropriate fatigue signing, as shown in
Figure C3 5.
For use at roadworks and temporary sites, the number and frequency can be reduced as the speed
environment is much lower.
Traverse rumble strips are to be placed across the entire pavement to minimise driver avoidance.
The width of the individual rumble strip should not be less than the average car axle spacing. The
recommended widths are shown in Figure C3 1 to Figure C3 4.
The height of strips is generally 10–20 mm and they are usually constructed by a polymer modified binder
spray seal on the existing pavement.
It is recommended that the last 15–30 m prior to the stop or give way line should be continuously treated with
the same rough-textured material used for the rumble strips (asphalt or recycled rubber) to provide a rough
surface on which to decelerate quickly should braking occur too late.
Figure C3 4: Rumble strip pattern for a fatigue zone (100 km/h approach)
Figure C3 5: Typical layout for signing and rumble strip pattern for a fatigue zone