UseofTrafficCalmingNearSchools TrafficCalming
UseofTrafficCalmingNearSchools TrafficCalming
UseofTrafficCalmingNearSchools TrafficCalming
INTRODUCTION
Parents often cite high vehicle speeds and traffic volumes as reasons for not allowing their children to walk or bicycle to and
from school. Calming traffic through the application of engineering tools can encourage drivers to reduce their speeds. At
lower operating speeds, drivers are better able to react in time to avoid collisions (see Figure 1). This is particularly
important around children, who may behave erratically or may not be alert to traffic. “Traffic calming” is the installation of
physical measures that alter driver behavior and improve conditions for nonmotorized street users. More specifically, traffic
calming objectives include:
Achieving slow speeds for motor vehicles;
Reducing collision frequency and severity;
Increasing safety and the perception of safety for pedestrians and bicyclists;
Reducing the need for police enforcement;
Enhancing the street environment (for example, streetscaping);
Increasing access for all modes of transportation; and
Reducing cut-through motor vehicle traffic.
This briefing sheet focuses on physical changes to roadways to achieve traffic calming, specifically to achieve improved
safety and accessibility for pedestrian and bicycle routes implemented through Safe Routes to School (SRTS) programs. Such
changes are generally more self-enforcing than traditional education and enforcement efforts, offer long-term benefits, and
usually do not require continued intervention.
Figure 1. Travel Speed vs. Reaction and Braking. Source: Street Smarts Marin, Transportation Authority of Marin
COLLABORATIVE PLANNING
Participants in a SRTS walking and bicycling audit may identify the need for traffic calming to enhance driver compliance
with existing school speed-limit zones and traffic controls (see ITE Briefing Sheets—Walking and Bicycling Audits, Reduced
School Area Speed Limits, and School Area Traffic Control). Transportation professionals should work closely with SRTS
committees and the neighboring community to categorize existing issues and identify potential traffic calming solutions.
1
Many jurisdictions have developed “toolboxes” of traffic calming measures appropriate for their school areas. The toolbox
provides descriptions of the various applicable traffic calming measures, as well as their potential advantages and
disadvantages, and cost. When selecting appropriate measures, planners and engineers should consider potential
1
The Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Traffic Calming Library provides information and research about a range of treatments:
www.ite.org/traffic/.
consequences, including diverting traffic onto other streets, impeding emergency or transit vehicles, or reducing access to
private homes.
The following traffic calming measures can be used to reduce travel speeds near schools:
Curb extensions
Curb extensions are installed to reduce the roadway width from curb
to curb at an intersection, shortening the crossing distance for
pedestrians and making it easier for motorists to see pedestrians. Also
known as bulbouts and neckdowns, curb extensions extend through
the parking lane but should not narrow the travel lane or impede
bicyclists on a bike route.
Speed humps
Speed humps are raised sections of pavement placed across the street to force motorists to reduce speeds. While they are
effective in reducing traffic speeds and are relatively low cost, speed humps may be controversial in some localities due to
their appearance, and potential jarring effects on vehicles and passengers.
Raised intersections
A raised intersection refers to a roadway intersection entirely elevated to
sidewalk level. Raised intersections are designed with ramps for the
vehicles and may include decorative surface materials on the flat, raised
section. Since raised intersections are usually the same height as the
sidewalk, they create a nearly seamless transition with sidewalks and
crosswalks, which are demarcated with truncated domes. Issues
associated with raised intersections include drainage, motorists turning
across the sidewalk area at corners, and the ability to communicate the
edge of the roadway to vision-impaired pedestrians.
Figure 3. Raised crosswalk through school parking lot. Neighborhood traffic circles/mini traffic circles
Source: Alta Planning + Design Mini traffic circles are often located on lower-volume residential streets,
where traffic is required to circulate counterclockwise around a center island, slowing entering and exiting drivers.
Modern roundabouts
Roundabouts are a type of circular intersection defined by three basic operational principles: 1) geometry that results in a
low-speed environment, 2) entering traffic yields to vehicles in the circulatory roadway, and 3) channelization at the
entrance and deflection around a center island are designed to be effective in reducing conflict. Proper site selection,
channelization, and design features are essential for making roundabouts accessible to all users, including student
pedestrians and cyclists. Modern roundabouts are recognized by FHWA as a proven countermeasure.
Traffic calming that primarily controls traffic volume restricts certain vehicular movements. Bicycle and pedestrian access
should be maintained through these measures. The following traffic calming measures can be used primarily to control
traffic volumes:
Half-street closures
Half-street closures block one side of the street at an intersection so that one direction of traffic is diverted to another
route. In the context of SRTS, they may be used to reduce high volumes of through traffic in the vicinity of schools or along
a school route. Half-street closures are often called partial closures or one-way closures. They are constructed using the
same materials and designs as full closures but may not require a turnaround. Some enforcement and neighborhood
outreach may be needed to obtain neighborhood approval and promote compliance. While half-street closures provide
emergency access for fire trucks and ambulances, consideration must be given to the effect they may have on school bus
routing, sanitation pickup, and mail delivery routes.
Median islands
Median islands are raised islands located in the middle of a street that continue across an intersection, preventing cut-
through motor vehicle traffic at a cross street. Median islands also block left-turning motorists off the main street, which
reduces conflicts with pedestrians crossing the main street. Wide median islands may also serve as a pedestrian refuge,
providing a safer two-stage crossing where pedestrians need to focus only on traffic coming from one direction at a time.
Median islands are recognized by FHWA as a proven countermeasure.
Forced-turn islands
Forced-turn islands are also called forced-turn channelizations, pork chops, or right-turn islands. They require traffic to turn
at an intersection and can prohibit drivers from turning into the side street.
ADDITIONAL RESOURCES
Traffic calming can play a key role in creating safe routes to school by reducing vehicle speeds and volumes and creating a
comfortable and attractive neighborhood bicycle and pedestrian environment. The measures previously described are just
a few examples of many available traffic calming tools. Numerous resources identify various traffic calming tools and their
advantages, disadvantages, and cost. Examples include the following:
National Center for Safe Routes to School: guide.saferoutesinfo.org/engineering/slowing_down_traffic.cfm
Institute of Transportation Engineers: www.ite.org/traffic/
Pedestrian and Bicycle Information Center: www.walkinginfo.org/engineering/calming.cfm
Federal Highway Administration: www.fhwa.dot.gov/environment/sidewalk2/sidewalks209.htm
Canadian Guide to Neighbourhood Traffic Calming: www.ite.org/traffic/tcstate.asp#cgntc
U.S. Traffic Calming Manual: www.planning.org/media/trafficcalming/
FHWA Proven Safety Countermeasures: http://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/provencountermeasures/
REFERENCES
National Center for Safe Routes to School: www.saferoutesinfo.org/
Institute of Transportation Engineers: www.ite.org/traffic/
Federal Highway Administration: www.fhwa.dot.gov/environment/sidewalk2/sidewalks209.htm
Parisi Associates, Transportation Tools to Improve Children’s Health and Mobility, 2004.
http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/LocalPrograms/TransportationToolsforSR2S.pdf
Pat Noyes, Traffic Calming Transportation Tech Sheet for Congress for New Urbanism.
http://www.cnu.org/sites/www.cnu.org/files/CNU_Traffic_Calming.pdf