SIFonline Experiment
SIFonline Experiment
EXPERIMENT# 11
Lab Report
3 Apparatus 3
5 Strain gauge 5
8 Procedure 7
9 Experimental data 9
10 Calculation 9
11 Report 9
2
1 Introduction
The stress intensity factor (K) is used in the field of fracture mechanics. It predicts
stress intensity near the tip of a crack caused by a remote load or residual stresses.The
magnitude of K depends on:
1. Sample geometry
3. Magnitude of load
4. Distribution of load
The stress intensity factor is a single-parameter characterization of the crack tip stress
field.
3 Apparatus
Strain gauges, V-notched specimen, strain indicator, multimeter, dead weights.
where,
3
Figure 2: Mode I, Mode II, and Mode III crack loading.
Using least square fitting (Gross, 1964; Brown 1966): Accuracy 0.5% for a/b ≤ 0.6
(Tada 1973): Accuracy better than 1% for a/b ≤ 0.2, 0.5% for a/b ≥ 0.2
where,
√
a1 = σyy r, σyy is the experimental stress data
r = distance of gauge from the crack
Note: The dimensions of the aluminium plate specimen (figure 3) used in the experiment
is given in the following table 1.
Assumption: Poisson’s ration and temperature effects are neglected.
4
Table 1: Dimension of the aluminium plate specimen.
a = b/2 28.5 mm
h 150 mm
t( plate thickness) 1 mm
r( near) 1 mm
r( far) 90 mm
5 Strain gauge
Resistance strain gauge is based on the phenomenon that the electrical resistance in a
piece of wire is directly proportional to the length and inversely to the area of the cross
section. If a resistance strain gauge is properly attached onto the surface of a structure
whose strain is to be measured, the strain gauge wire/film will also elongate or contract
with the structure, and as mentioned above, due to change inn length and/or cross section,
the resistance of the strain gauge changes accordingly. This change is measured using
a strain indicator(with the wheatstone bridge circuitry), and the strain is displayed by
properly converting the change in resistance to strain. Every strain gauge, by design,
has a sensitivity factor called the gauge factor which correlates strain and resistance as
follows
∆R/R
Gauge factor(SG ) =
ε
5
Where R is resistance of undeformed strain gauge. ∆R is change in resistance of strain
gauge due to strain, and ε is strain.
6
Figure 5: Strain gauge.
The strain sensitivity can be increased to two-fold if choice of strain gauge locations is so
selected such that ∆R1 and ∆R2 experience opposite but equal strains.
8 Procedure
The experiment procedures are explained below,
1. Hang the specimen(with preinstalled strain gauges) vertically. Measure the impor-
tant dimensions such as breadth b, crack length a, thickness t.
2. Measure the resistance of the strain gauges using the multimeter and note it down.
3. Choose dummy strain gauge having same resistance as that of the active strain
gauge for bridge connection.
4. Form a Half bridge by connecting active and dummy strain gauge as shown in 9 .
7
Figure 7: Longitudinal and lateral strain.
5. Switch on the strain indicator and by rotating the BAL knob set the display to
+/-0000.
6. Set the Bridge knob to half bridge and the other knob to the strain gauge resistance.
8
9 Experimental data
The experimental data is given in the following table 2.
10 Calculation
For calculation use data given in the table 2. This table consists several strain values
for different loading. All strains are given in µm unit. The column labeled as “Near”
contains the values of strains near the notch and the column labeled as“Far” contains the
values of strains far from the notch. The steps for the calculation is given below.
Step-2 Next calculate the stress generated at minimum cross section area of the specimen.
P
σ=
A
where P = applied load, and A = area of the cross section.
Step-4 Next consider both longitudinal and lateral strains near the notch (near or far
from the notch), and find the average strain.
q
ε = ε2x + ε2y
Step-5 Find σyy using Young’s modulus (E) of the material of the specimen. For, alu-
minium the value of the Young’s modulus is 68 GPa.
σyy = Eε
Step-7 Next calculate between K1theo and K1expt using equations (1) and (5) respectively.
11 Report
9
Table 3: Table of Results
10