Scribd
Upload
13 views4 pages

Calculus II - Solution #3

Uploaded by

nguyennhutientuan
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
13 views4 pages

Calculus II - Solution #3

Uploaded by

nguyennhutientuan
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 4

Calculus II

Tutorial #3 - Solutions

Problem 1.

To find fx , we keep y, z as constants and differentiate f with respect to x:


∂f ∂
= (1 + xy 2 − 2z 2 ) = 0 + 1.y 2 − 0 = y 2 .
∂x ∂x

Similarly,
∂f ∂
= (1 + xy 2 − 2z 2 ) = 0 + x.2y − 0 = 2xy,
∂y ∂y
and
∂f
= −4z.
∂z

Problem 2.
∂f ∂ p
= (x − y 2 + z 2 ) = 1 − 0 = 1,
∂x ∂x
∂f ∂ p 1 y
= (x − y 2 + z 2 ) = 0 − 2y. p = −p ,
∂y ∂y 2
2 y +z 2 y + z2
2

∂f ∂ p z
= (x − y 2 + z 2 ) = − p .
∂z ∂z y2 + z2

Problem 3.
1 1
fx = 1. = ,
x + 2y + 3z x + 2y + 3z
1 2
fy = 2. = ,
x + 2y + 3z x + 2y + 3z
3
fz = .
x + 2y + 3z

Problem 4.
2 +y 2 +z 2 ) 2 +y 2 +z 2 )
fx = 2x.(−e−(x ) = −2x.e−(x ,
−(x2 +y 2 +z 2 )
fy = −2y.e ,
2 +y 2 +z 2 )
fz = −2z.e−(x .

1
Problem 5.

Using the definition of partial derivatives we have:


∂f f (1 + h, 2) − f (1, 2)
= lim
∂x (1,2)
h→0 h
(1 − (1 + h) + 2 − 3(1 + h)2 .2) − (1 − 1 + 2 − 3.12 .2)
= lim
h→0 h
−6h2 − 13h
= lim
h→0 h
= lim (−6h − 13) = −13.
h→0

And
∂f f (1, 2 + h) − f (1, 2)
= lim
∂y (1,2)
h→0 h
−2h
= lim = −2.
h→0 h

Problem 6.

Using the definition of partial derivatives we have:


∂f f (−2 + h, 3) − f (−2, 3)
= lim
∂x (−2,3)
h→0 h
√
2h + 4 − 2
= lim
h→0 h
2h 1
= lim √ = .
h→0 h( 2h + 4 + 2) 2
Doing similarly,
∂f 3
= .
∂y (−2,3) 4

Problem 7.

Definition of the partial derivative ∂f /∂z at (x0 , y0 , z0 ) is


∂f f (x0 , y0 , z0 + h) − f (x0 , y0 , z0 )
= lim .
∂z (x0 ,y0 ,z0 )
h→0 h

We use this definition of partial derivatives to obtain


∂f f (1, 2, 3 + h) − f (1, 2, 3)
= lim
∂z (1,2,3)
h→0 h
12 .2.(3 + h)2 − 12 .2.32
= lim
h→0 h
= lim 2h + 12 = 12.
h→0

2
Problem 8.

Definition of the partial derivative ∂f /∂z at (x0 , y0 , z0 ) is

∂f f (x0 , y0 + h, z0 ) − f (x0 , y0 , z0 )
= lim .
∂y (x0 ,y0 ,z0 )
h→0 h

We use this definition of partial derivatives to obtain

∂f f (−1, h, 3) − f (−1, 0, 3)
= lim
∂y (−1,0,3)
h→0 h
= lim 2h + 9 = 9.
h→0

Problem 9.

a. We express dw/dt as a function of t in two ways:


By using the Chain Rule:
dw ∂w dx ∂f dy ∂f dz
= + +
dt ∂x dt ∂y dt ∂z dt
1 1 x + y −1
= .(− sin t).2 cos t + . cos t.2 sin t − .
z z z 2 t2
= 1.

By expressing w in terms of t

cos2 t sin2 t dw
w= + =t⇒ = 1.
1/t 1/t dt

b. Since dw/dt takes the constant value then dw/dt at t = 3 is 1.

Problem 10.

a. Before using the Chain Rule we need to find the following partial derivatives
∂w ∂w ∂w −1
= 2yex , = 2ex , = ,
∂x ∂y ∂z z
and
dx 2t dy 1 dz
= 2 , = 2 , = et .
dt t + 1 dt t + 1 dt
Then using the Chain Rule we obtain
dw ∂w dx ∂f dy ∂f dz
= + + = 4t tan−1 t + 1.
dt ∂x dt ∂y dt ∂z dt

By using the expression of w in term of t: w = 2(t2 + 1) tan−1 t − 1 we have

dw/dt = 4t tan−1 t + 1.

3
b. Evaluating dw/dt at the given value of t
dw π
= 4.1. + 1 = π + 1.
dt t=1 4

Problem 11.

Using the Chain Rule we have


∂w ∂w ∂x ∂w ∂y ∂w ∂z
= + +
∂r ∂x ∂r ∂y ∂r ∂z ∂r
= 2(x + y + z) (1 − sin(r + s) + cos(r + s)) .
then using r = 1, s = −1 to obtain
∂w
= 6.
∂r (1,−1)

Problem 12.

First, we need to find that


∂w y ∂w 1 ∂x ∂y
= 2x − 2 , = , = −2, = 1.
∂x x ∂y x ∂v ∂v
Then using the chain rule we get
 
∂w y 1
= (2x − 2 )(−2) + .1 = −7.
∂v (0,0) x x (u,v)=(0,0)

Problem 13. The proof is similar to the proof of Problem 11 and 12, so it is left for
you!

Problem 14.

Let w(x) = F (x, y) = x3 − 2y 2 + xy, then


dw ∂F ∂F dy
0= = +
dx ∂x ∂y dx
then we get the implicit formula
dy Fx 3x2 + y
=− =− .
dx Fy −4y + x
At the point (1, 1)
dy 4
= .
dx 1 3

Problem 15.

Using the implicit formula as in the Problem 14 we get


 
dy 2x + y 4
= − = .
dx 1 x + 2y (1,2) 5

You might also like