Discourse Analysis
Discourse Analysis
ANALYSIS
BELÉN COITO & ABIGAIL TEGIACCHI
WHAT IS DISCOURSE
ANALYSIS?
It's usually defined as “language beyond
the sentence.”
It deals with the study of language in
texts and conversations.
INTERPRETING DISCOURSE
Let's read the following text:
My Town
Interrupting: while one speaker is talking, another speaker cuts the flow
and starts talking over that person. This might be seen as “rude” if there
are some unspoken rules about the turn-taking among the speakers.
Waiting: the speaker that wants to talk or answer, waits for a specific
occasion to arise, in order to take their turn and speak up. That occasion
might never come, and in those instances that speaker might be seen as
shy or introverted by the other speakers if there is an unspoken rule
about the turn-taking.
TURN TAKING
Besides this, there are also two styles of turn-giving in a conversation:
Keeping the turn: for this type of talking the one that speaks uses
different fillers, such as connectors and hesitation markers, so whenever
this person has to pause, instead of giving space for another speaker to
complete the sentence or make a question, simply fills in the gaps with
“er…em” “em… well” in the case that this person uses fillers, or words such
as “like”, “as”, “then” or “so” in the case that the speaker makes a point in
looking like has already planned the idea beforehand.
In contrast with the speaker above, this type of speaker leaves pauses in
the middle of the sentences that is making, sometimes doing this in order
to leave space for other speakers to take a turn.
THE CO-OPERATIVE PRINCIPLE
This often pushes people to make the assumption that participants are cooperating
with each other while talking.
The philosopher Paul Grice made a statement about the four principles that this
assumption carries, which are the following:
Quantity: make your contribution as informative as required(not more, not less).
Quality: do not say things that you know are false or you lack evidence for.
Relation: be relevant.
Manner: be clear and brief.
While these principles might not always be used, they are a useful set of guidelines of
what must be expected of a conversation, as well as a useful tool to explain the
features of the discourse.
HEDGES
Words or phrases used to indicate the lack of proof or accuracy for a
statement that the speaker is going to say. The following phrases are
usually used:
“it’s possible”
“It’s likely”
“it may/might”
“I think”
“It could(be that)”
IMPLICATURES
These are things that are implied by speakers
when they use HEDGES.
Every speaker implies something when they
talk, and those implications can be deducted
by the background knowledge.
BACKGROUND KNOWLEDGE
The interpretation or assumptions we make when
talking or reading will depend on our background
knowledge, and the stereotypes we might face everyday.
Inspired on this assumptions, there are several riddles
that challenge our knowledge, such as the following
example.
BACKGROUND KNOWLEDGE
A man and his son were in an automobile accident.
The man died on the way to the hospital, but the
boy was rushed into surgery. The emergency room
surgeon said “I can't operate, that's my son!”
How is this possible?
BACKGROUND KNOWLEDGE
A man and his son were in an automobile accident. The man
died on the way to the hospital, but the boy was rushed into
surgery. The emergency room surgeon said “I can't operate,
that's my son!” How is this possible?
SCHEMAS AND SCRIPTS
A schema is a general term for a conventional knowledge structure that
exists in memory.
We have many schemas (or schemata) that are used in the interpretation of
what we experience and what we hear or read about.