Basic Concepts of Income Tax - Week 4
Basic Concepts of Income Tax - Week 4
Basic Concepts of Income Tax - Week 4
In Emil Webber v. C. I. T [1993 AIR SC 1466], it was explained that, “The definition of 'Income' in S. 2(24) of
the Act is an inclusive definition. It adds several artificial categories to the concept of income but on that account
the expression 'income' does not lose its natural connotation. It is repeatedly said that it is difficult to define the
expression 'income' in precise terms. Anything which can properly be described as income is taxable under the Act
unless, of course, it is exempted under one or the other provision of the Act.” In this case, the personnel employed
received reimbursement of the Tax amount by the employer firm and these personnel contended that the tax
amount received cannot be treated as an income of the assessee at all. However, it was laid down that the said tax
amount received in integral to the salary component of the assessee and was thereby included as perquisites
received in lieu of salary.
Concept of Income
-
Subsidy. Grant or any form of assistance from Govt
-
Fair market value of inventory
-
Compensation for termination of agency
-
Non-compete compensation
-
Movable/immovable property received as a gift exceeding
value of Rs. 50,000/-
- Winnings from an entertainment program, card - Value of any perquisite/profit in lieu of salary (compensation on
games. termination of employment)
- Benefit or perquisite received by a Director of a - Interest, Salary, bonus commission received by the Partner of a
Company Firm.
- Profits of any business of insurance carried on by a - Export Incentives such as duty drawbacks, cash compensation
mutual insurance company or a Co-operative Society. or refunds
CIT v. G.R. Karthikeyan [1993 Supp (3) SCC 222]
Issue: Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Appellate Tribunal was right in holding that the
total sum of INR 22,000 received by the assessee from the Indian Oil Corporation and All India Highway Motor Rally
should not be brought to tax?
Facts:
The assessee participated in the All India Highway Motor Rally. He was awarded the first prize of INR 20,000 by the Indian
Oil Corporation and another sum of INR 2000 by the All India Highway Motor Rally. On the above basis, the assessee won
the first prize and received a total sum of INR 22,000.
The Income Tax Officer included the same in the income of the respondent-assessee relying upon the definition of ‘income’ in
clause (24) of Section 2.
On appeal, the Appellate Assistant Commissioner held that in asmuch as the rally was not a race, the amount received cannot
be treated as income within the meaning of Section 2(24)(ix).
Madras High Court: In the present case, the rally was not a race and the receipt does not represent winnings as they fail to fit
the sub-clause.
Supreme Court, assessing the implications of the judgment of the High Court:
If winnings from gambling/betting activities are included within the ambit of income, why should monies from non-
betting activities not included?
SC held that the expression income must be construed in its widest sense. The definition of income is an inclusive
one. Hence, the prize money received by the assessee will form the part of the income. It also stated that the High Court
erred in reading several clauses of Section 2(24) and considered it as exhaustive definition.
Even if the receipt does not fall within the ambit of any of the sub-clauses in Section 2(24), it may still be income if it
partakes of the nature of income.
The idea behind providing inclusive definition to Section 2(24) is not to limit its meaning but to widen its net. This court
has repeatedly said that the word ‘income’ is of widest amplitude, and that it must be given its natural meaning.
Concept of Income
• Cash or Kind: Income may be received in cash or in kind. When income is received in kind (such as perquisites), its valuation will be made
in accordance with the rules prescribed in the Income Tax Rules, 1962.
• Legal or illegal source: The income tax law does not make any distinction between income accrued or arisen from a legal source and income
tainted with illegality. In Minister of Finance vs Smith (1927 AC 193 PC)it was laid down that the Income-Tax Act is not necessarily
restricted in its application to lawful business only. Prosecutions for the offence will not disentitle the I-T department from taxing the profits
arising out of the commission of the offence. Income is income even though tainted. The power of the Dominion Legislature to impose
income tax would not be limited by provincial law declaring an activity illegal. In CIT v. Piara Singh (1980) 3 Taxman 67, the Supreme
Court has held that if smuggling activity can be regarded as a business, the confiscation of currency notes by customs authorities is
a loss which springs directly from the carrying on of the business and is, therefore, permissible as a deduction.
Important: Section 37 which deals with allowance and deduction of expenditure, was amended vide Finance Act, 1998 w.e.f.
01.04.1962 whereby Explanation 1 was added to clarify that any expenditure incurred by an assessee for any purpose which is an
offence or which is prohibited by law shall not be deemed to have been incurred for the purpose of business or profession and no
deduction or allowance shall be made in respect of such expenditure. In contrast thereto, consciously no such restriction has been
brought in law with regard to set off of the value of the unaccounted stock in trade which have been absolutely confiscated.
Explanation 1 to Section 37(1) of the Act expressly disallows any expenditure incurred by an assessee for any purpose which is an
offence or is prohibited by law, which may be claimed as an expenditure incurred for the purpose of business/profession. A
penalty or a confiscation is a proceeding in rem, and therefore, a loss in pursuance to the same is not available for deduction
regardless of the nature of business, since a penalty or confiscation cannot be said to be incidental to any business.
• Temporary/Permanent: There is no difference between temporary and permanent income under the Act. Even temporary income is taxable
in the same way as permanent income.
• Lumpsum/instalments: Income, whether received in lumpsum or in instalments, is liable to be taxed. For example: arrears of salary or
bonus received in lumpsum is income and charged to tax as salary. Example: arrears of salary/ outstanding salary or bonus received in lump sum is
income and charged to tax as salary
• Same Income Cannot be taxed twice
• Income Tax is a composite tax on all incomes received by or arising during a year.
• Income/real profit is to be computed on commercial principles, subject to the IT Act and is distinguished from statutory profits (Poona
Electric Supply Co. v. CIT - MANU/SC/0121/1965)
• Gifts: The Finance Act 2004 introduced section 56(2)(x) for taxing gifts in the hands of the recipient. Aggregate value
of cash gifts received without consideration during a financial year (FY) would be taxable as other income in the hands
of the recipient. However, if the aggregate value of such gifts is less than Rs 50,000, then it would be exempt from tax.
The recipient is not required to pay income tax if the money or property is received from a relative or under certain
specified circumstances such as on the occasion of marriage or under a will or by way of inheritance, or in
contemplation of death of payer etc. This rule applies irrespective of the value of the gift.
• Income Should be real & not fictional
• Contingent Income is not income until the contingency has been realized fully.
• This real accrual of income test was elaborated by the Supreme Court in Godhra Electricity Company v/s. C. I. T.,
(1997) 4 SCC 530. In this case, a government circular entitled the Assessee to recover consumption charges from its
customers at enhanced rates. As this order was the subject matter of protracted litigation, the Assessee was unable to
recover the enhanced charges. Consequently, it challenged the inclusion of such amount within its assessable income on
the ground that no real income had accrued. The Court held that tax cannot be imposed on hypothetical accrual of
income. It was observed that the question of real accrual of income must be considered by taking the probability of
realisation in a realistic manner.
• Composite Income: Income tax is composite tax on all the incomes received by or arising to a taxpayer during a year.
Therefore, tax will be imposed on the aggregate of all incomes earned/received by the assessee during the year.
• Nomenclature used by the parties is not decisive of the character of receipts.
• Receipt basis/Accrual basis: Income arises either on receipt-basis or on accrual-basis (i.e. it may accrue to a taxpayer
without its actual receipt).
• Revenue or Capital receipt: Income tax, as the name implies, is a tax on income and not a tax on every item of money
received. Therefore, unless the receipt in question constitutes income which distinguished from capital, it cannot be
charged to tax. This implies (subject to certain exceptions) only revenue receipts are taxable.
Receipt V/s. Accrual basis
E. D. Sasoon vs CIT [1954] 26 ITR 27 (SC)- “Income may accrue to an assessee without the
actual receipt of the same. If the assessee acquires a right to receive the income, the income can
be said to have accrued to him though it may be received later on its being ascertained. The
basic conception is that he must have acquired a right to receive the income. There must be a
debt owed to him by somebody.. Unless and until there is created in favour of the assessee a
debt due by somebody it cannot be said that he has acquired a right to receive the income or
that income has accrued to him.”
Receipt of Income refers to the first occasion when the recipient gets the money under his
control.
Accrues and arises is used in contra-distinction to the word ‘receive’. Income is said to be
received when it reaches the assessee; when the right to receive the income becomes vested in
the assessee, it is said to accrue / arise.
◦ For income to accrue it must have ripened into a debt, that is, the assessee should have
acquired a right to receive the payment though the receipt itself may take place later. The payer
must have an unconditional liability to pay the taxpayer.
Capital Receipt v/s. Revenue Receipt
Hon'ble Bombay High Court had an occasion to deal with issue relating to taxability of "Capital Receipts" in case of Cadell Weaving Mill
Co. (P) Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax 116 Taxman 77 wherein Court has observed as under: "It is well settled that capital receipts
do not come within the ambit of the Income Tax Act except to the extent of any capital receipt being expressly sought to be covered by the
Act of the Parliament".
Capital Receipts v. Revenue Receipts
Capital Receipt v/s. Revenue Receipt
Receipts are of two types, viz. Capital Receipts & Revenue Receipts.
The distinction between the two is vital because capital receipts are exempt from tax unless
they are expressly taxable (for instance capital gains [S.45] are taxable even if they are
capital receipts). On the other hand, revenue receipts are taxable unless expressly exempt
from tax (for eg. Agricultural income exempt u/s. 10).
Act does not define these terms.
The essential difference between capital & revenue is that capital is a fund; revenue is a flow
– French v/s. Wolf 160 SO 396, 181 La. 733 [SC of Lousiana].
Although the general principle of law is to tax only revenue receipts as income, there are
exceptions to this rule under which capital receipts are also taxable as income & included in
the definition of income:
Capital Receipts are inherently exempt unless expressly taxable in the Act [for eg in the
following instances], while Revenue receipts are inherently taxable unless expressly
exempt in the Act.
(i) Any compensation received for termination of employment or modification of the terms of
employment would be taxable as salary income. [S. 17(3)(i)]
(ii) Compensation or other payment due to specified persons covered u/S. 28(ii)(a)(b) & (c)
(iii) Capital Gains S. 45
(iv) Non-compete Fee S. 28(va)
There are various tests relevant for the determination of the nature of receipts.
The Supreme Court in Oberoi Hotel (P) Ltd. Vs. CIT (1999) XI SITC 109 (SC), has held that the question
whether the receipt is the capital or the revenue has to be determined by drawing the conclusion of law
ultimately from the facts of the particular case and it is not possible to lay down any single test as infallible or
any single criterion as decisive
1. The receipt would be on capital account where the transaction merely amounts to change of investment or is
for the purposes of realisation of capital. Where, however, such transaction is one entered into in the ordinary
course of business, it would be a revenue receipt.
2. Distinguish between Fixed Asset & Circulating Asset - Fixed Asset is that which may or may not be
involved directly in the process of business and remains unaffected by the process. Circulating asset is that part
of the capital which is turned over in the business and which ultimately results in profit or loss. A receipt
referable to a fixed asset is a capital receipt, while what is referable to circulating asset or stock in-trade of an
Assessee would be a revenue receipt. What is a fixed asset for one person may be a circulating asset for another.
Machinery in the hands of a manufacturer is part of his fixed asset, whereas the same machinery with a
machinery dealer is part of his circulating asset.
3. Receipt in the hands of the recipient is material: In deciding whether a certain receipt is income or not, the
test is its character in the hands of the recipient and not character in the hands of the payer, nor the fund
out of which the money came. What may be regarded as capital in the hands of the payer may yet be income in
the hands of payee. [CIT v Vazir Sultan & Sons (1959) 36 ITR 175 (SC)]. Eg. Payment received on the
redemption of debentures, if held as investment by the recipient = capital receipt in the hands of the recipient,
even if the company makes payment out of its trading profits (revenue in nature). [source is irrelevant]
Non-compete fee : Guffic Chemical Pvt Ltd v CIT Belgaum - Ranbaxy paid a non-compete fee of INR 50,00,000
to Guffic Chemicals. In turn, Guffic agreed to not compete for a period of 20 years from the date of the
agreement. The territory for the purpose of agreement was within India and the rest of the world. The agreement
further showed that the payment was in consideration of the restrictive covenant undertaken by the assessee for a
loss of source of income. Court held: Capital receipt. From April 1, 2003, Parliament has made non-compete fee
a taxable capital receipt under Section 28(va) which is now covered within Section 2(24).
Whether receipt is in lieu of Source of Income: A receipt in lieu of source of income is capital receipt
(compensation for loss of employment), while a receipt in lieu of income is revenue receipt.
Payments made to secure the services of key employees are considered revenue expenditures because they are
part of the company’s ordinary business operations. The lump sum is not spent on creating any new capital asset,
but rather on retaining an employee
The Supreme Court in KCP Ltd. vs. CIT (2000) 245 ITR 421 has held that it is not the name given by the
Assessee or even the revenue of anyone else that matters, but it is the true character of the receipt that
determines its taxability and being regarded as falling within the capital field or out of it.
IRRELEVANT PROPOSITIONS:
- Payer’s motive not material.
- Nomenclature used – irrelevant
- Treatment as income by the assessee is not conclusive
- Source is irrelevant
- Magnitude of the receipt is not a determining factor
- The Fact the receipt is recurring or non-recurring in nature
bonus
CIT v/s. Vazir Sultan & sons AIR 1959 SC 814
Facts - 1931: Assessee, a registered firm, was sole distribution agent for the Hyderabad State for the cigarettes manufactured by
M/s. Vazir Sultan Tobacco Co. 1939: The arrangement was extended, and Assessee was also made agent outside the Hyderabad
State. 1951: The board of Directors passes a resolution & reverted back to original arrangement and Assessee was paid Rs
2,19,343 as compensation for the loss of agency outside Hyderabad State. The Income-tax Officer included this sum in the
Assessees total income and taxed it as a revenue receipt. Prime Issue- The question was whether the amount paid to Assessee is
revenue receipt or capital receipt?
Revenue’s argument: Sole selling agency which was granted to the Assessee in 1931 was merely expanded in 1939 so far the
territory is concerned; decision in 1951 merely reverted to the original arrangement. What was done in 1951 did not affect the
structure, profit making or business apparatus of the Assessee. Expansion and restriction of Assessees territory were in the
ordinary course of business and merely accidents of business. Thus, sum received by Assessee as compensation is income receipt
Firm’s Arguments - We are not in the business of acquiring agencies. The agency granted to us in the Hyderabad State was a
capital asset. The agency granted to us outside the Hyderabad State was accretion to capital asset. Thus, loss of the latter agency
resulted in ‘sterilisation of the capital asset’. Hence the compensation is capital receipt as it is for loss of a capital asset.
HELD - In the case before us the agency agreement in respect of territory outside the Hyderabad State was as much an asset of the
Assessees business as the agency agreement within the Hyderabad State and though expansion of the territory of the agency in
1939 and the restriction thereof in 1950 could very well be treated as grant of additional territory in 1939 and the withdrawal
thereof in 1950, both these agency agreements constituted but one employment of the assesses as the sole selling agents of the
company.
Nothing on record to show that the acquisition of agencies constituted the Assessees business. Agency was not the business of the
Assessee but the means by which it entered into business transactions i.e. distribution of cigarettes. The agency agreements in fact
formed a capital asset of the Assessees business worked or exploited by the assesses by entering into contracts for the sale of the
Charminar cigarettes manufactured by the company to the various customers and dealers in the respective territories. This asset
really formed part of the fixed capital of the Assessees business. Thus, agency was nothing but capital asset of the Assessee and
compensation for loss of same would be nothing but capital receipt
TAXABILITY OF SUBSIDIES – Whether Revenue receipts or capital receipts?
M/S. Sahney Steel And Pressworks vs The Commercial Tax Officer & Ors [AIR 1985 SC 1754] (Purpose test) SC, in this
case, examined the taxability of subsidy received by company from State Government. The subsidy was received by way of
refund of sales tax paid on raw material, power subsidy, land rates concessions etc., only after the commencement of production.
The SC held that the nature of a subsidy, whether capital or revenue, depends on the purpose. In case purpose of the subsidy is to
support the assessee to set up its business, to complete a project, or to acquire a capital asset, the subsidy would be capital receipt.
If it is given for assisting him in carrying out the trade/business operations only after commencement of production, such subsidy
would be a revenue receipt. SC held that as subsidies were not granted for production of any new asset & were granted year after
year only after setting up of the new industry and commencement of production, such subsidy would be regarded as assistance
given for business purposes = Revenue Receipt.
CIT v. Ponni Sugars & Chemicals Ltd. (SC)- (2008) 306 ITR 392 (SC) SC held that the character of the receipt of a subsidy
under a scheme has to be determined wrt. purpose. The point of time at which the subsidy is paid is irrelevant. If the object of the
subsidy is to enable the Assessee to run the business more profitably then it is a revenue receipt. If the object is to enable the
setting up a new unit or to expand an existing unit then it would be capital receipt. Here, subsidy was given in the form of capital
cost to encourage upgrading the sugar industry is clearly a capital receipt.
CIT vs. Chaphalkar Bros. 178 (SC)/[2018] 252 Taxman 360 (SC) – SC held that subsidy in the form of concession in
entertainment tax to construct new multiplexes is capital in nature, while taking into account the purpose test laid down in the
above two cases.
What is most important is the ‘Purpose test’ that determines the character of the receipt in the hands of the assessee for which the
subsidy is given. If the object of the subsidy scheme was to enable the assessee to run the business more profitably, the receipt is
on revenue account. On the other hand, if the object of the assistance of subsidy scheme was to enable the assessee to set up a
new unit or to expand the existing unit then the receipt is of capital nature.
However, the Finance Act, 2015 [relevant for financial year (FY) 2016-17 onwards] with effect from 01/04/2016 which ultimate
culminated into the taxing belt with the due insertion of Sub-Clause (xviii) in Section 2(24) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 providing an
inclusive definition of the expression `Income’ under the taxing law. It includes any assistance in the form of subsidy/ grant/ cash, duty
incentive etc., received from the government as income for the purposes of the Act.
5 heads of Income
As per S. 14 of the IT Act 1961, all income shall, for the purposes of Income Tax and Computation of
Total Income be classified under the following heads of income:
i. Salaries [Sections 15 to 17]
ii. Income from House Property [Sections 22 to 27]
iii. Profits & Gains from Business & Profession [Sections 28 to 44DB]
iv. Capital Gains [Section 45-55A]
v. Income from other sources [Section 56-59]
Aggregate of incomes computed under the above 5 heads, after applying clubbing provisions and making
adjustments of set off & carry forward of losses is known as Gross Total Income [Section 80B] - (" gross
total income" means the total income computed in accordance with the provisions of this Act, before making
any deduction under Chapter VIA)
Total Income/ Total Taxable Income: The total income of an assessee is computed by deducting from the
gross total income, all deductions permissible under Chapter VIA of the IT Act – i.e. deductions under
Section 80C to Section 80U.
Salary [Refer to the notes mentioned below]
Salary is the remuneration paid by the employer to the employee for the services rendered for a certain period of time. It is paid in fixed
intervals i.e. monthly one-twelfth of the annual salary. Salary includes: Basic Salary or the fixed component of salary as per the terms of
employment. Fees, Commission and Bonus that the employee gets from the employer. Allowances that the employer pays the employee to
meet his personal expenses. Allowances are taxed either fully, partially or are exempt.
Sec 15 - any salary due from an employer or a former employer, any salary paid or allowed to him in the previous year and any arrears of
salary paid or allowed to him
Sec 16 - ❖ chargeable income is arrived at making a deduction of fifty thousand rupees or amount of salary, whichever is less ❖ deduction
in respect of any allowance in nature of an entertainment allowance
❖ deduction of any sum on account of a tax on employment within meaning of Art 276(2)
Section 17 - What constitutes salary and perquisites – definitions
Income from House Property [Refer to the notes mentioned below]
The basis of charge of income is the Annual Value of the property. Annual Value is inherent capacity of the property to earn an income. It is
the amount for which the property might reasonably be expected to let from year to year. Income from house property is charged to tax
on as generally tax is not on receipt of Income but on the inherent potential of the house property to generate income.
Sec 22 - the annual value of any property consisting of any buildings or lands appurtenant thereto of which the assessee is the owner ❖
Other than such portions of of such property as he may occupy for the purposes of any business or profession carried on by him the profits
of which are chargeable to income tax
Sec 23 - annual value is determined by ❖ Sum for which the property might be expected to let from year to year ❖ Where property is let
and the sum is more than expected, then such sum
Sec 24 - deductions ❖ Thirty per cent of the annual value
❖ Where the property has been repaired, renewed, etc with borrowed capital then
the interest on such capital ❖ Municipal taxes
Sec 27 - owner of property defined
Income from House property is added to the person's total income only if such house or part of the house is let out for whole or part of the
year, or any other benefit derived from the house by the owner.
When the assessee has more than one house then, then he/she can exercise an option to treat anyone of the house to be self-occupied. For
being taxed, assessee must be the owner of the property.
If the property is occupied by an assessee for the purpose of its business or profession, the profits of which are already chargeable to tax, then
annual value of property shall not be taxed under this head. The levy of tax while taxing income from house property is on the income
from the property and not on the property itself.
Sec 28 - profits and gains of any business or profession carried on by the assessee during the previous year –
Incomes that are to be added in this head include:
Any profit and gains earned form business or profession during previous year.
Any income received/due for any compensation or payment for managing the affairs of the company, in connection with termination or
modification of such management.
Income derived from providing specific services for its members by trade, profession or any similar association.
holding agency in relation to business of any other person; salary, bonus or commission received by a partner of a firm
Sec 30, 31, 32 - Some expenses are there in a business that are completely deductible like: Rent rates, salaries, preliminary expenses,
depreciation, travelling, printing and postage expensed., etc.
Some expenses are only deductible at time of actual payment like: Any duty, cess or fees , Contribution to provident fund, gratuity fund or
other funds for welfare of employees. Bonus or commission or leave encashment payable to employees. Interest on loan from public financial
institutions, state financial corporation or from scheduled bank
Capital Gains - Sec 45 - profits or gains arising from transfer of a capital asset in the previous year
Income from other sources - Sec 56 - income which is not to be excluded from the total income but is not chargeable under any of the above
4 heads . Dividends, Winning from lotteries, crossword puzzles, gambling etc. Interest on FDs. Gifts received by an individual or HUF.
Exemptions & Deductions
Basics of Assessment Procedure
As per section 14, the income of a person is computed under the following five heads:
1. Salaries
2. Income from house property
3. Profits and gains of business or profession
4. Capital gains
5. Income from other sources
There are specific deductions prescribed under every head which pertain to the particular expenditures incurred against
such head to arrive at the Gross Total Income. No deduction or adjustment on account of any expenditure can be made
except as provided by the act.
Gross Total Income: Aggregate income [NET AFTER CONSIDERING HEAD-WISE DEDUCTIONS FOR
EXPENDITURE] under these heads in accordance with the provisions of the Act before making any
deduction under Sec.s 80C to 80U.
Total taxable Income: It is the Gross Total Income as reduced by the amount permissible as deduction under Secs
80C to 80U. https://cleartax.in/s/80c-80-deductions
Exemptions (Sec.10): income that qualifies as an exemption is not included in the computation of total income