Zinna 2014
Zinna 2014
Review Article
Lanthanide Circularly Polarized Luminescence:
Bases and Applications
FRANCESCO ZINNA AND LORENZO DI BARI*
Dipartimento di Chimica e Chimica Industriale, Università di Pisa, Pisa, Italy
• observe transitions that cannot be easily observed in ab- TABLE 1. Ln3+ transitions generally observed in CPL mea-
sorption (as it is the case with f → f transitions of surements with their D class22 and their approximate
lanthanides); wavelength
• observe only selected transitions (since one may have Ion Transition Wavelength (nm) Class
many chromophores but only a few luminophores that
respond to a certain excitation wavelength). Sm3+ 4
G5/2 → 6H5/2 565 DII
4
G5/2 → 6H7/2 595 DIII
Lanthanide complexes are optimal candidates to be studied Eu3+ 5
D0 → 7 F 1 595 DI
through CPL. Tb3+ 5
D4 → 7 F 5 545 DII
Dy3+ 4
F9/2 → 6H11/2 670 DIII
In this brief review we shall discuss some recent applications
and developments of lanthanide CPL. All the following exam-
ples deal with complexes in solution: in the literature there
are only rare and relatively old examples of measurements in degenerate in a total symmetric environment: depending on
the solid state, although the current interest for applications the coordination sphere this degeneracy can be removed,26
of lanthanide luminescence in devices of various types should leading to a splitting of the emission band.
solicit more activity solid-state CPL measurements. The energy gap among these levels can be as small as 100–
130 cm1, which translates to 5 nm or less in the yellow-
Where to Look for High glum Values orange region.
High glum values are to be sought for among electric dipole As a consequence, at room temperature this may be only
forbidden/magnetic dipole-allowed transitions. partially (if at all) resolved.
In fact, for the transition i → j the luminescence dissymme- As occurs in other spectroscopies where bands may have
try factor can be written as: different signs, and very notably in electronic and vibrational
circular dichroism (CD), in CPL there may be an apparent
μ mji cosθμ;m
ij
g lum ¼ 4 2 2 (2) resolution enhancement when nearby transitions have oppo-
μ þ mji site rotational strengths.
ij
This is notably the case of the CPL spectrum shown in Fig. 1,
where μij and mji are the electric and magnetic transition di- concerning the 5D4 → 7 F5 transition of a Tb3+ chiral complex.27
pole vectors and θμ,m is the angle between them. In the case Clearly, when this happens, total emission and CPL bands
of an electric dipole-allowed transition, the |mji|2 term is neg- do not coincide in general and special care should be taken
ligible with respect to |μij|2; so Eq. (2) becomes: in evaluating the glum value.
mji Knowing the energies of the J levels provides useful infor-
g lum ¼ 4 cosθμ;m (3) mation about the crystal field environment, which in turn
μij
can be correlated with the polarizability of the donor groups.28
with the |mji| /|μij| ratio being well less than 1.
A strict Laporte selection rule cannot apply in chiral mole-
cules, because rotation-reflection (or rotoreflection) ele-
ments, like symmetry planes and inversion, are excluded by
chirality itself. Nonetheless, if the chromophore can be con-
sidered intrinsically achiral, then one can generally postulate
that for some of its electronic transitions μij is very small so
that glum may become sizeable (but in any case smaller than
2).
Richardson22 classified lanthanide transitions in three clas-
ses (DI, DII, and DIII) concerning the dissymmetry factor:
the magnitude of the observed dissymmetry factors is ex-
pected to decrease as DI > DII > DIII. Richardson himself
noted that the Eu3+ 5D0 → 7 F1 is the only lanthanide transi-
tion belonging to class DI easily accessible to CPL measure-
ment; no wonder that the highest glum values have been
measured for this transition.
Besides Eu3+, CPL spectra in the visible region are com-
monly measured for Sm3+,23,24 Tb3+,23,25 and Dy3+23 com-
plexes; in Table 1 we show the transitions generally
observed in CPL measurements and their D class.
‡
It may be interesting to notice that the same ligand was also employed to
sensitize curium(III).36
§
It should be recalled that LnDOTA complexes are partially hydrated, de-
spite the fact that the ligand is 8-dentate and the resulting complexes an-
ionic. However, this is a function of the ionic radius of a given
lanthanide.38
¶
Two main mechanisms describe the energy transfer: Dexter and Förster
resonant energy transfer (FRET).2 Both depend strongly on the donor-
acceptor distance R: Dexter mechanism depends on e-αR, while FRET de-
Scheme 1. Cyclen (L1) and triazacyclononane (L2). pends on R6.
Chirality DOI 10.1002/chir
ZINNA AND DI BARI
• chiral diketones can be easily synthesized through a that in these cases the CPL activity is mainly controlled by
Claisen type reaction from cheap natural enantiopure the chirality of D-facam ligands.
ketones.
Other Diketonate-Based Chiral Complexes
Therefore, it is not surprising that many complexes with out- 1,1,1,5,5,5-Hexafluoropentane-2,4-dione (HFA, L8,
3+
standing optical and chiroptical properties belong to this class: Scheme 4) is known to be a good sensitizer for Eu . HFA
to the best of our knowledge, Eu(TTA)32 L6 (TTA = 2- has been used by Yuasa et al.46 to synthesize a series of com-
thenoyltrifluoroacetonate, L4; L5 = dibenzylsulfoxide; Scheme 3) plexes Ln(HFA)3 L* (L* = L15, L11, L12, Scheme 4) in which
displays the highest quantum yield reported for a Eu3+ complex the chiral ligand L* induces an asymmetric arrangement of
(85%) at solid state,39,40 while the heterobimetallic complex the three HFA ligands around the lanthanide.
CsEu(hfbc)4 (hfbc =heptafluorobutyrylcamphorate, L6; Scheme 3) With the reported series of Pybox ligands as L*, they ob-
showed a glum value of 1.38, the highest ever measured for an tained high luminescence quantum yields (34–41%) and glum
Ln3+ system.20,24 It should also be noted that the same ligand values (|0.15|–|0.46|) in CD3CN solution for Eu3+ complexes.
L6 was able to sensitize Sm3+, providing another complex with Interestingly enough, the signs of the 5D0 → 7 F1 and
5
excellent polarization characteristics. For the manifold associ- D0 → 7 F2 transitions were the same for L* = (R)-iPr-Pybox
ated with the Sm3+ 4G5/2 → 6H5/2 transition, Kaizaki and ((R)-L11) and (R,R)-Me-Ph-Pybox ((R,R)-L12), but they were
colleagues24 reported glum values of 1.15 (at 553 nm), 0.35 inverted for bis-4R-(4-phenyl-oxazolinyl)pyridine ((R)-Ph-
(561 nm), +0.96 (575 nm), and 0.45 (588 nm). Pybox, (R)-L15) (see Table 3 and Scheme 4).
In order to correlate the CPL spectrum signature with the
complex structure, single-crystal X-ray structural analyses
Camphor-Based Systems were performed. It was found that the ligand–ligand intramo-
Camphor provides a rigid chiral backbone employable in lecular interactions account for the asymmetric arrangement
the synthesis of β-diketones; aside from the exceptional per- around the lanthanide ion, justifying the observed CPL spec-
formances mentioned for CsEu(hfbc)4, several other trum signature. Anyway, no analysis to assess the actual
camphorate-based complexes have been investigated by structure in solution nor the possible stereoisomer equilibria
CPL spectroscopists with interesting results. was carried out. However, the CD spectra measured in solu-
Tris europium trifluoromethylcamphorate (Eu(facam)3, tion for EuL83L11 and EuL83L12 display bands with the same
facam = L7; Scheme 4) in dimethylsulphoxide displays a glum sign, while the sign is inverted for EuL83L15, consistent with
of |0.78|41 and it is used as a standard for CPL instruments cal- the solid-state data.
ibration,42 even though this practice has been recently criti- It is worth noting that the CPL of Eu(facam)3 L14 and Eu
cized and other systems have been proposed.43 (HFA)3 L15 has been investigated even at solid state. taking
Recently, Eu(facam)3 complexes with several ancillary li- the measurements on single crystals.47
gands have been synthesized and their CPL measured in
solution. Polynuclear Systems
Harada et al.44,45 employed ligands with atropos or tropos Recently, chiral polylanthanidic systems with large glum
axial chirality such as (R/S)-2,2’-bis(diphenylphosphoryl)- values have begun being synthesized.
1,10-binaphthyl ((R/S)-BINAPO, (R/S)-L9),-2,2’-bis(diphenyl- Mamula et al.48 reported a C3 trinuclear complex with a chi-
phosphoryl)-1,10-biphenyl (BIPHEBO, L10), with central ral bipyridine–carboxylate ligand (L16, Fig. 2), formed
chirality as bis-(4R/4S)-(4-isopropyl-oxazolinyl)pyridine ((R/S)- through a completely diastereoselective self-assembly pro-
i
Pr-Pybox, ((R/S)-L11), and bis-(4S,5S/4R,5R)-(4-methyl-5-phe- cess which shows also a complete chiral self-recognition in
nyl-oxazolinyl)pyridine ((S,S/R,R)-Me-Ph-Pybox, (S,S/R,R)-L12), the presence of enantiomer mixtures of the ligand, yielding
and achiral ligands as 1,10-phenanthroline (Phen, L13) and the system of formula Eu3L16 1
6 . In addition, H-NMR studies
triphenylphosphine oxide (TPPO, L14) (Scheme 4). The re- showed that the gross crystal structure of the system (see
ported glum values for the magnetic transitions in acetone-d6 Fig. 2) is preserved in CH2Cl2 solution.4 glum of |0.088|
range from |0.44| to |1.0| (Table 2). and |0.0806| were measured in CH2Cl2 for the 5D0 → 7 F1
Changing the absolute configuration of the ancillary li- and 5D4 → 7 F5 transitions of the Eu3+ and Tb3+ complexes,
gands in Eu((R/S)-BINAPO)(D-facam)3 and Eu((R/S)-iPr- respectively.
Pybox)(D-facam)3, the glum sign remains unchanged, indicating More recently, Mazzanti and colleagues10 synthesized an
Eu3+ complex with multilayered supramolecular architecture
using (S/R)-6’-(4-phenyloxazolin-2-yl)-2,2’-bipyridine-6-car-
boxylate as a ligand (L17, Fig. 3) and investigated its optical
properties.
Starting from a ligand of S (or R) chirality, one obtains a
mixture of diastereomeric Δ and Λ complexes of EuL17 2 stoi-
chiometry with only partial selectivity (Λ/Δ ≈ 1.8, with S li-
gand). In concentrated acetonitrile solution (6 mM),
complexes of formula Eu3L17 6 self-assemble with a defined
helicity (namely, Δ, with S ligand), this system displays 25%
quantum yield with a |0.45| glum value for the 5D0 → 7 F1
transition.
A controlled addition of Eu(OTf)3 leads to formation of a
Scheme 3. Two Eu3+ complexes displaying peculiar optical (Eu(TTA)32 L5, heptanuclear system displaying a 27% quantum yield with a
quantum yield = 85%), and chiroptical (CsEu(hfbc)4, glum = 1.38) features. |0.10| glum value. This glum is lower than that measured for
Chirality DOI 10.1002/chir
LANTHANIDE CIRCULARLY POLARIZED LUMINESCENCE
Scheme 4. Diketonate-based Eu3+ complexes and ancillary ligands reported in Refs. 44–46.
Fig. 4. Binding between the EuL20 and α1-AGP. On the right: CPL (blue navy and orange) and total luminescence (light blue and red) for free and bound forms
(reproduced from Ref. 50 with permission of The Royal Chemical Society).
Chirality DOI 10.1002/chir
LANTHANIDE CIRCULARLY POLARIZED LUMINESCENCE
3+
Me Ph
According to Parker et al.,50 it is also possible that the coor-
dination changes the geometry around the lanthanide provid-
HN O ing a twist angle closer to the ideal one for static coupling
N mechanism (namely, 22.5°) (see section below).
N N N
O Ln
N N N ORIGIN OF STRONG CPL
N N
Me H Any chiroptical activity requires a nonvanishing rotational
O strength:
NH
Ph
Me ^ jii ¼ I μij mji
R ij ¼ I½hij^μj j ih j jm (4)
SSS-Δ[TbL21] where μ ^ are the electric and magnetic dipole transition
^ and m
operators and I is the imaginary part of the following expres-
sion. In an emission process the energy of the initial state i is
higher than that of the final state j; in this case Eq. (4) gauges
CPL.
For a magnetic dipole-allowed electric dipole-forbidden tran-
sition, like an Ln-centered f-f transition, μij ≈ 0 is expected and
therefore a vanishing rotational strength. The process giving rise
to CPL activity can be conveniently represented with reference to
two limiting mechanisms: static and dynamic coupling.22 The for-
mer is only possibly relevant when the ligand lacks any signifi-
cant chromophoric group; in all the other cases both
mechanisms should be taken carefully into account.
Static Coupling
Fig. 5. Lanthanide macrocyclic complex (TbL21) and CPL spectrum before In a dissymmetric environment, a mixing of, e.g., 4f and
(blue) and after (purple) addition of serum albumin (reproduced with permis-
sion from Ref. 9. Copyright 2009 American Chemical Society). 5d orbitals may provide the necessary odd-parity
interconfigurational character yielding μij ≠ 0.22,61 This can
This switching occurs selectively with serum albumin, happen only if the first coordination sphere is chiral and there-
while it does not with other proteins, cyclodextrins, or chiral fore the covalent contribution to the bonds between the lan-
anions. This led Parker and colleagues to envisage a potential thanide and the donor atoms entails invoking such hybrids.
use for these complexes as a probe for CPL microscopy.9 In the typical parlance of chiroptical spectroscopies, and in
The sensitive nature of the lanthanide-centered CPL has particular in ECD, this case can be described as an intrinsi-
been further demonstrated by Yuasa et al.8 A 1-biphenyl-3- cally chiral chromophore.
perfluoroethyldiketonate moiety was covalently bound to bo- In the limit of low covalence, the coordination neighbor-
vine serum albumin or other proteins, such as Staphylococcus hood causes only a weak perturbation of the metal states, so
aureus recombinant nuclease A and insulin. This diketonate the sum rule can apply, yielding a vanishing integral of the
has a strong affinity for lanthanides and is a good sensitizer CD or CPL spectrum over all the f transitions. This is hardly
for Eu3+; in fact, complexing these systems with Eu3+, the pro- of practical aid when we deal with a complex of Eu3+, Tb3+
tein fills the coordination sphere around the lanthanide as a or other visible-emissive lanthanides, because their transi-
function of its structural and chemical characteristics; in addi- tions range from the IR to UV region and many of them will
tion, it provides an asymmetric environment allowing one to almost surely be covered by ligand-centered bands.
record different Eu3+-centered CPL spectra (Fig. 6). Yb3+ and Ce3+ represent a special case: since they have a 4f1
and 4f13 electronic configuration, respectively, they behave
as monoelectronic systems with only two levels each. In
Lanthanide CPL and Ion Binding particular, while the Ce3+ 2 F7/2 → 2 F5/2 transition falls in
Lanthanides display strong affinity for hard anions, which the IR region and may be covered by ligand VCD signals,
are able to displace weak neutral ligands. Moreover, it is pos- Yb3+ 2 F7/2 → 2 F5/2 falls in the NIR region and can thus be
sible to tune the coordination strength of acidic ligands as a often easily recorded without significant interferences.32,62
function of pH and the pKa of the ligand itself. A variable coor- In the limit of perfect static coupling the integral over the
dination may modulate the coordination geometry to which manifold corresponding to the MJ splitting allied with this
CPL is sensitive. transition is expected to vanish.
Eu3+ complexes have been used as probes for bicarbonate or This result can be transferred to isostructural complexes of
pH.50,60 Various enantiopure cyclen-based structures have other lanthanides. Lanthanide complexes often show
been developed as responsive systems in which the concentra- isostructurality along the series; this means that the geome-
tion of bicarbonate can be tracked following the variation of the try of the system may show no significant dependence on
luminescence dissymmetry factor for a selected transition. the lanthanide ion.||
Complex EuL23, bearing a sulfonamide moiety on one arm,
||
has proven to be pH-responsive: when pH increases the sul- Ligand-centred ECD spectra of isostructural compounds do not display
fonamide moiety is deprotonated and thus it is able to coordi- significant variations. A nonchirooptical method to asses isostructurality
is through analysis of the NMR data; in fact, paramagnetic shifts and re-
nate the metal center; this results in a rigidification of the laxation rates of paramagnetic Ln3+ compounds contain geometric infor-
complex leading to increasing glum values at 632 nm (Fig. 7). mation. For details we refer to the specific literature.62,63
Chirality DOI 10.1002/chir
ZINNA AND DI BARI
Fig. 6. Covalent binding of 1-biphenyl-3-perfluoroethyldiketonate to the protein and complexation with Eu3+ and Eu-centred CPL of various adducts (reproduced
from Ref. 8 with permission of The Royal Chemical Society).
For this mechanism, in the common case of a distorted with pure magnetic dipole character. Once more, making ref-
square antiprismatic geometry, as found for example in erence to common nomenclature in ECD theory, we deal with
DOTA-like complexes or in tetrakis diketonates (notably in an intrinsically achiral chromophore. Optical activity can stem
the case of CsEuL64), the CPL signal should vary with the twist from some coupling interaction between metal-centered tran-
angle ϕ following a sin(4ϕ) trend, so the maximum is reached sitions and the dissymmetric environment provided by the
for ϕ = 22.5° (Fig. 8).64 ligands beyond the first coordination sphere.
The previously cited CsEu(hfbc)4 (Scheme 3) complex pro-
Dynamic Coupling vides an interesting example to analyze.
When the coordination polyhedron is itself achiral, the li- CsEu(hfbc)4 has an almost perfect antiprismatic geometry
gand field should allow only for f → f electronic transitions in solution with a twist angle of 41.4°, thus static coupling
Chirality DOI 10.1002/chir
LANTHANIDE CIRCULARLY POLARIZED LUMINESCENCE
Fig. 7. Top: changes in the coordination sphere of EuL23 as a response to increasing pH. Bottom: glum for the transition at 632 nm as a function of pH (reproduced
from Ref. 50 with permission of The Royal Chemical Society).
Each diketonate can be depicted as a linear polarizable fluorescence experiment. On the other hand, if it were an issue,
group, directed parallel to the vector joining the two oxygen their large Stokes shift would allow one to adopt an in-line ge-
atoms; that is, oblique with respect to the x–y-plane. When ometry. To this end, one must prevent the exciter beam to
the Ln-centered transition is excited (either in absorption or reach the detector, which may be achieved by simply adding
in emission), its associated electric quadrupole induces a si- a lowpass filter after the sample. When using a diffraction-grate
multaneous electric dipole moment μlig on each diketonate. monochromator, one must be aware that higher harmonics of
In turn, these four electric dipoles couple with one another the exciting radiation may fall in the emission region.**
providing components with different symmetry: either be- Moreover, the large luminescence dissymmetry factors
longing to A-irrep, i.e., oriented along z, or doubly degenerate usually obtained for lanthanides may allow one to measure
(E) in the x-y plane. lanthanide CPL spectra using simple static optics, employing
Only this latter (low-energy) E component of the μlig -μlig a quarter wave retarder and a linear polarizer. Early measure-
coupling (μDyn.Coup) can constructively interact with the mLn ments in the field of CPL were made with similar devices
to provide rotational strength (consisting in the scalar prod- without photoelastic modulators, which are now common in
uct m · μ). On the contrary, the axial A-counterpart leads to CPL spectrophotometers.68
cancellation. This setup allowed Oosterhoof et al. to measure glum values
The dynamic coupling mechanism can only be efficient with a standard deviation within 0.005 and 0.01.69–71
when the lanthanide and the chromophoric group are spa-
tially close, since the dipole–quadrupole interaction depends
on the Ln-μlig distance R 4; moreover, it depends on the dif- More About the Luminescence Dissymmetry Factor
ference between the frequencies of the lanthanide-centered Plotting glum vs. λ. In a CPL measurement, ΔI and I are not ab-
and the ligand-centered transitions; this dependence can be solute quantities; in fact, as in ordinary fluorescence experi-
accounted for as a perturbation. When these conditions are ments, not all of the emitted light is detected, depending on
fulfilled, this mechanism can provide transitions with a strong the experimental conditions. On the other hand, the lumines-
circular polarization, if compared with the simple static cence dissymmetry factor, as defined in Eq. (1), is an absolute
coupling; in fact, dynamic coupling does not entail invoking value. Therefore, there are good physical reasons to discuss
Ln orbital hybridization, which is generally small, since the and report CPL spectra in terms of glum, not only of individ-
covalency is low in the Ln-ligand bond. ual bands but also as a continuous function of wavelength
When this mechanism is active, f → f transitions can no lon- (or wavenumber).
ger be considered isolated, because it is naturally coupled However, some precautions should be taken when plotting
with ligand-centered transition(s); so, unlike the case of static glum (λ).
coupling, the integral over the bands of the NIR-CD spectrum Indeed, out of the emission zones, I and ΔI are equal
of an Yb3+ isostructural complex will be nonvanishing. to 0, thus glum gives rise to a mathematically undefined
form: the practical result is an amplification of the instru-
mental fluctuations around zero,†† with erratic and possi-
SUGGESTIONS ON HOW TO MEASURE AND REPORT bly very large values of glum, where one would actually
CPL SPECTRA OF LANTHANIDE COMPLEXES expect 0. This may be quite a serious issue with lantha-
CPL spectra are measured through a continuous wave scan nides, since the emission bands are very narrow and com-
whose most significant parameters are the passing band w, monly without relevant tailing. Moreover, such narrow
the time constant k, and the scan speed v; they all display crit- bands are commonly instrumentally traced with very few
ical aspects when dealing with Ln complexes. data points; therefore, trying to eliminate the noise through
A general rule among spectroscopists states that these pa- smoothing algorithms is a risky choice; in fact, in this
rameters must fulfill the condition: way a faithful reproduction of the profile of these bands
can be hard to achieve.
1 We therefore suggest introducing a trivial mathematical ar-
w > kv (5)
2 tifice defining a corrected glum as:
Particular caution should be taken in setting the passing
ΔI
bandwidth; in fact, as stated above, lanthanide emission e
g lum ¼ (6)
bands can be very narrow (less than 5 nm), and they are often I þδ
multiplets with nearby bands, with possibly opposite CPL where the correcting constant δ has to be chosen bigger than
sign; if these components remain unresolved, they will cancel the instrumental noise but negligible with respect to the
out (at least partially), causing error in the assessment of the smallest emission signal one wants to measure (for example,
intensity of the CPL signal and in the calculation of the glum 1/100 of I).
value. As an example, in Fig. 10 we show a plot of glum (without
With a passing band of 1 nm and a time constant of 1 sec, correction) and eg 1um (δ = 3 · 104, i.e., 2/100 of the maximum
the scan speed should be set to 0.5 nm/sec. As an example, intensity of the band at 585 nm) for a CPL spectrum obtained
we note that it will take 4 min for each scan to acquire a for CsEu(hfbc)4.
120-nm region: this may be typical when dealing with Eu3+ For instance, considering the 550–570 nm region, one can
complexes. see that the correction is sufficient to smooth the baseline
A low enough scan speed is also necessary to accurately de-
tect the emission maxima of the narrow CPL lines, which in
**For example, setting the excitation to 305 nm may interfere with the
turn is necessary to calculate accurate glum values. 610 nm band of an Eu3+ complex.
Lanthanide CPL spectra are usually recorded with a 90° ge- ††
This noise comes from the definition of glum itself and not directly from
ometry between the source and the detector, as in an ordinary the experimental measurement.
Chirality DOI 10.1002/chir
LANTHANIDE CIRCULARLY POLARIZED LUMINESCENCE
11. Huang C-H Rare earth coordination chemistry: Fundamentals and applica- 34. Haas Y, Stein G. Quenching of the fluorescence of rare earth ions by high
tions. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons; 2010. energy vibrations of solvent molecules: calculations of Franck-Condon
12. Bünzli J-CG, Comby S, Chauvin A-S, Vandevyver CDB. New opportunities factors from spectral data. Chem Phys Lett 1972;15:12–16.
for lanthanide luminescence. J Rare Earth 2007;25:257–274. 35. Stein G, Würzberg E. Energy gap law in the solvent isotope effect on radi-
13. Vuojola J, Soukka T. Luminescent lanthanide reporters: new concepts for ationless transitions of rare earth ions. J Chem Phys 2008;62:208–213.
use in bioanalytical applications. Methods Appl Fluoresc 2014;2:012001. 36. Law G-L, Andolina CM, Xu J, Luu V, Rutkowski PX, Muller G, Shuh DK,
14. McGehee MD, Bergstedt T, Zhang C, Saab AP, O’Regan MB, Bazan GC, Gibson JK, Raymond KN. Circularly polarized luminescence of curium: a
Srdanov VI, Heeger AJ. Narrow bandwidth luminescence from blends new characterization of the 5f actinide complexes. J Am Chem Soc
with energy transfer from semiconducting conjugated polymers to euro- 2012;134:15545–15549.
pium complexes. Adv Mater 1999;11:1349–1354. 37. Seitz M, Do K, Ingram AJ, Moore EG, Muller G, Raymond KN.
15. Evans RC, Douglas P, Winscom CJ. Coordination complexes exhibiting Circularly polarized luminescence in enantiopure europium and terbium
room-temperature phosphorescence: evaluation of their suitability as trip- complexes with modular, all-oxygen donor ligands. Inorg Chem
let emitters in organic light emitting diodes. Coord Chem Rev 2009;48:8469–8479.
2006;250:2093–2126. 38. Beeby A, Clarkson I.M., Dickins R.S., Faulkner S, Parker D, Royle L,
16. Giovanella U, Pasini M, Freund C, Botta C, Porzio W, Destri S. Highly ef- de Sousa A.S., Williams JAG, Woods M. Non-radiative deactivation of
ficient color-tunable OLED based on poly (9,9-dioctylfluorene) doped the excited states of europium, terbium and ytterbium complexes by
with a novel europium complex. J Phys Chem C 2009;113:2290–2295. proximate energy-matched OH, NH and CH oscillators: an improved
17. Klampaftis E, Ross D, McIntosh KR, Richards BS. Enhancing the perfor- luminescence method for establishing solution hydration states. J Chem
mance of solar cells via luminescent down-shifting of the incident spec- Soc Perk T 2 1999:493–504.
trum: a review. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 2009;93:1182–1194. 39. Malta O, Brito H, Menezes J, Gonçalves e Silva F, de Mello Donegá C,
18. Bünzli J-CG, Eliseeva SV. Lanthanide NIR luminescence for telecommunica- Alves Jr S. Experimental and theoretical emission quantum yield in the
tions, bioanalyses and solar energy conversion. J Rare Earth 2010;28:824–842. compound Eu (thenoyltrifluoroacetonate)3• 2 (dibenzyl sulfoxide). Chem
19. Muller G. Luminescent chiral lanthanide(III) complexes as potential Phys Lett 1998;282:233–238.
molecular probes. Dalton Trans 2009:9692–9707. 40. Freund C, Porzio W, Giovanella U, Vignali F, Pasini M, Destri S, Mech A,
20. Lunkley JL, Shirotani D, Yamanari K, Kaizaki S, Muller G. Extraordinary Di Pietro S, Di Bari L, Mineo P. Thiophene based europium β-diketonate
circularly polarized luminescence activity exhibited by cesium tetrakis complexes: effect of the ligand structure on the emission quantum yield.
(3-heptafluoro-butylryl-(+)-camphorato) Eu(III) complexes in EtOH and Inorg Chem 2011;50:5417–5429.
CHCl3 Solutions. J Am Chem Soc 2008;130:13814–13815. 41. Schippers P, van den Buekel A, Dekkers H. An accurate digital instru-
21. HPJM Dekkers. Circularly polarized luminesence: a probe for chirality in ment for the measurement of circular polarization of luminescence. J Phys
the excited state. In: N Berova, K Nakanishi, Woody RW, editors. Circular E 1982;15:945.
dichroism: principles and applications. New York: Wiley-VCH 2000; 42. Riehl JP, Richardson FS. Circularly polarized luminescence spectroscopy.
185–215. Chem Rev 1986;86:1–16.
22. Richardson FS. Selection rules for lanthanide optical activity. Inorg Chem 43. Bonsall SD, Houcheime M, Straus DA, Muller G. Optical isomers of
1980;19:2806–2812. N, N′-bis(1-phenylethyl)-2, 6-pyridinedicarboxamide coordinated to
23. Petoud S, Muller G, Moore EG, Xu J, Sokolnicki J, Riehl JP, Le UN, Cohen europium(III) ions as reliable circularly polarized luminescence calibration
SM, Raymond KN. Brilliant Sm, Eu, Tb, and Dy chiral lanthanide com- standards. Chem Commun 2007:3676–3678.
plexes with strong circularly polarized luminescence. J Am Chem Soc 44. Harada T, Nakano Y, Fujiki M, Naito M, Kawai T, Hasegawa Y. Circularly po-
2007;129:77–83. larized luminescence of Eu(III) complexes with point- and axis-chiral ligands
24. Lunkley JL, Shirotani D, Yamanari K, Kaizaki S, Muller G. Chiroptical dependent on coordination structures. Inorg Chem 2009;48:11242–11250.
spectra of a series of tetrakis ((+)-3-heptafluorobutylyrylcamphorato) 45. Harada T, Tsumatori H, Nishiyama K, Yuasa J, Hasegawa Y, Kawai T.
lanthanide(III) with an encapsulated alkali metal ion: circularly polarized Nona-coordinated chiral Eu(III) complexes with stereoselective ligand–
luminescence and absolute chiral structures for the Eu(III) and Sm(III) ligand noncovalent interactions for enhanced circularly polarized lumines-
complexes. Inorg Chem 2011;50:12724–12732. cence. Inorg Chem 2012;51:6476–6485.
25. Seitz M, Moore EG, Ingram AJ, Muller G, Raymond KN. Enantiopure, 46. Yuasa J, Ohno T, Miyata K, Tsumatori H, Hasegawa Y, Kawai T.
octadentate ligands as sensitizers for europium and terbium circularly po- Noncovalent ligand-to-ligand interactions alter sense of optical chirality in
larized luminescence in aqueous solution. J Am Chem Soc 2007; luminescent tris(β-diketonate) lanthanide(III) complexes containing a chiral
129:15468–15470. bis(oxazolinyl) pyridine ligand. J Am Chem Soc 2011;133:9892–9902.
26. Bauer H, Blanc J, Ross DL. Octacoordinate chelates of lanthanides. Two 47. Tsumatori H, Harada T, Yuasa J, Hasegawa Y, Kawai T. Circularly polar-
series of compounds. J Am Chem Soc 1964;86:5125–5131. ized light from chiral lanthanide(III) complexes in single crystals. Appl
27. Samuel AP, Lunkley JL, Muller G, Raymond KN. Strong circularly polar- Phys Express 2011;4:011601.
ized luminescence from highly emissive terbium complexes in aqueous 48. Mamula O, Lama M, Telfer SG, Nakamura A, Kuroda R, Stoeckli–Evans
solution. Eur J Inorg Chem 2010;2010:3343–3347. H, Scopelitti R. A trinuclear EuIII array within a diastereoselectively self–
28. Dickins RS, Parker D, Bruce JI, Tozer DJ. Correlation of optical and NMR assembled helix formed by chiral bipyridine–carboxylate ligands. Angew
spectral information with coordination variation for axially symmetric Chem 2005;117:2583–2587.
macrocyclic Eu(III) and Yb(III) complexes: axial donor polarizability 49. Evans NH, Carr R, Delbianco M, Pal R, Yufit DS, Parker D. Complete
determines ligand field and cation donor preference. Dalton Trans stereocontrol in the synthesis of macrocyclic lanthanide complexes: direct
2003:1264–1271. formation of enantiopure systems for circularly polarized luminescence
29. Riehl JP, Muller G. Circularly polarized luminescence spectroscopy and applications. Dalton Trans 2013;42:15610–15616.
emission-detected circular dichroism. In: Berova N, Polavarapu PL, 50. Carr R, Evans NH, Parker D. Lanthanide complexes as chiral probes exploiting
Nakanishi K, Woody RW, editors. Comprehensive chiroptical spectros- circularly polarized luminescence. Chem Soc Rev 2012;41:7673–7686.
copy. Vol. 1. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley; 2012. 51. Butler SJ, Lamarque L, Pal R, Parker D. EuroTracker dyes: highly emis-
30. Brittain HG, Desreux JF. Luminescence and NMR studies of the confor- sive europium complexes as alternative organelle stains for live cell imag-
mational isomers of lanthanide complexes with an optically active polyaza ing. Chem Sci 2014;5:1750–1756.
polycarboxylic macrocycle. Inorg Chem 1984;23:4459–4466. 52. Metcalf DH, Snyder SW, Wu S, Hilmes GL, Riehl JP, Demas JN,
31. Aime S, Botta M, Fasano M, Marques MPM, Geraldes CF, Pubanz D, Richardson FS. Excited-state chiral discrimination observed by time-
Merbach AE. Conformational and coordination equilibria on DOTA com- resolved circularly polarized luminescence measurements. J Am Chem
plexes of lanthanide metal ions in aqueous solution studied by 1H-NMR Soc 1989;111:3082–3083.
spectroscopy. Inorg Chem 1997;36:2059–2068. 53. Das Gupta A, Richardson FS. Spectroscopic studies of lanthanide ion binding
32. Di Bari L, Pintacuda G, Salvadori P. Stereochemistry and near-infrared circu- to multidentate ligands in aqueous solution. 3. Optically active Tb(EHPG)(L)n
lar dichroism of a chiral Yb complex. J Am Chem Soc 2000;122:5557–5562. and Tb(DPA)m(L)n complexes. Inorg Chem 1981;20:2616–2622.
33. Di Bari L, Salvadori P. Static and dynamic stereochemistry of Chiral Ln 54. Moussa A, Pham C, Bommireddy S, Muller G. Importance of
DOTA analogues. Chem Phys Chem 2011;12:1490–1497. hydrogen–bonding sites in the chiral recognition mechanism between
Chirality DOI 10.1002/chir
LANTHANIDE CIRCULARLY POLARIZED LUMINESCENCE
racemic D3 terbium(III) complexes and amino acids. Chirality 64. Bruce JI, Parker D, Lopinski S, Peacock RD. Survey of factors determin-
2009;21:497–506. ing the circularly polarized luminescence of macrocyclic lanthanide com-
55. Kirschner S, Bakkar I. Utilization of the pfeiffer effect and outer-sphere plexes in solution. Chirality 2002;14:562–567.
complexation for the prediction of absolute configurations of optically 65. Di Pietro S, Di Bari L. The structure of MLn(hfbc)4 and a key to high
active metal complexes. Coord Chem Rev 1982;43:325–335. circularly polarized luminescence. Inorg Chem 2012;51:12007–12014.
56. Pescitelli G, Di Bari L, Berova N. Application of electronic circular dichroism 66. Mason S Molecular optical activity and the chiral discriminations.
in the study of supramolecular systems. Chem Soc Rev 2014;43:5211–5233. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1982.
57. Carr R, Di Bari L, Lo Piano S, Parker D, Peacock RD, Sanderson JM. A 67. Di Pietro S. Synthesis, structural and dynamic investigation of chiral metal
chiral probe for the acute phase proteins alpha-1-acid glycoprotein and complexes. PhD thesis: University of Pisa; 2012.
alpha-1-antitrypsin based on europium luminescence. Dalton Trans 68. Castiglioni E, Abbate S, Longhi G. Revisiting with updated hardware an
2012;41:13154–13158. old spectroscopic technique: circularly polarized luminescence. Appl
58. Montgomery CP, New EJ, Parker D, Peacock RD. Enantioselective regu- Spectrosc 2010;64:1416–1419.
lation of a metal complex in reversible binding to serum albumin: dynamic
69. Emeis C, Oosterhoff L. Emission of circularly-polarized radiation by
helicity inversion signaled by circularly polarized luminescence. Chem
optically-active compounds. Chem Phys Lett 1967;1:129–132.
Commun 2008;4261–4263.
70. Dekkers HP, Emeis C, Oosterhoff LJ. Measurement of optical activity in
59. Dias DM, Teixeira JMC, Kuprov I, New EJ, Parker D, Geraldes CFGC.
racemic mixtures. J Am Chem Soc 1969;91:4589–4590.
Enantioselective binding of a lanthanide(III) complex to human serum albumin
studied by 1H STD NMR techniques. Org Biomol Chem 2011;9:5047–5050. 71. Emeis CA, Oosterhoff LJ. The n–π* absorption and emission of optically
60. Smith DG, McMahon BK, Pal R, Parker D. Live cell imaging of lysosomal active trans–β–hydrindanone and trans–β–thiohydrindanone. J Chem
pH changes with pH responsive ratiometric lanthanide probes. Chem Phys 1971;54:4809–4819.
Commun 2012;48:8520–8522. 72. Herren M, Morita M. Near-infrared circular polarized luminescence spec-
61. Richardson FS, Faulkner TR. Optical activity of the f–f transitions in trigo- troscopy of GMO: Er3+ crystals. J Lumin 1995;66:268–271.
nal dihedral (D3) lanthanide(III) complexes. I Theory J Chem Phys 73. Maupin CL, Parker D, Williams JG, Riehl JP. Circularly polarized lumines-
1982;76:1595–1606. cence from chiral octadentate complexes of Yb(III) in the near-infrared. J
62. Di Bari L, Salvadori P. Solution structure of chiral lanthanide complexes. Am Chem Soc 1998;120:10563–10564.
Coord Chem Rev 2005;249:2854–2879. 74. Maupin CL, Dickins RS, Govenlock LG, Mathieu CE, Parker D, Williams
63. Di Pietro S, Lo Piano S, Di Bari L. Pseudocontact shifts in lanthanide JG, Riehl JP. The measurement of circular polarization in the near-IR lumi-
complexes with variable crystal field parameters. Coord Chem Rev nescence from chiral complexes of Yb(III) and Nd(III). J Phys Chem A
2011;255:2810–2820. 2000;104:6709–6717.