15cdv6 ht3
15cdv6 ht3
Characterisation
Uniaxial tensile tests were carried out on 8 mm thickness
at tensile specimens with 12·5 mm gauge width. The tensile
specimens were prepared according to ASTM standard A370,
but with a total length of 300 mm instead of the standard
length of 200 mm. The extra length was accommodated in
the grip portion. The specimens were fabricated from heat
treated plate coupons and tested in an Instron machine of
50 t capacity and at a crosshead speed of 2 mm minÕ 1. Grain
size measurements were obtained using the linear intercept
method according to ASTM standard E112.
Unit cell parameters were determined by X-ray diVraction
of electropolished bulk specimens using a Philips PW1729
diVractometer and Fe K radiation. A slow scan of 0·02° sÕ 1
was used, and measurementsa were obtained from {200}, {211}
and {220} planes. The c/a ratios were then calculated by
deconvoluting the doublets and using the procedure described
by Prokoshkin et al.9 Foils for TEM were electropolished in
a Struers Teunopol 3 twin jet polisher, using 80 : 20 methanol/
perchloric acid as electrolyte, at 20°C and 10 V dc. Foils
were subsequently studied at 200 keV in a Philips CM200
TEM. Dimensional measurements were obtained using the
online interface of the CM200 series, which employs de ector
coil movements to measure distances in the microstructures.
Misorientation measurements were carried out using the
commercial package TSL–ACT. The advanced crystallo-
graphic technique (ACT) is a tool for online local orientation
measurement in the TEM. The package has been developed
and marketed by TSL–EDAX. At least 15 misorientation
measurements each from three diVerent specimens were
obtained, by means of convergent beam Kikuchi diVraction.
RESULTS
Mechanical properties
Figure 1 shows the change in yield strength (YS) (Fig. 1a),
ultimate tensile strength ( UTS) (Fig. 1b) and ductility
(as estimated by percentage elongation) (Fig. 1c) as a function
of tempering temperature for all three hardening treat-
ments. The main points concerning the relative changes in
mechanical properties, as a function of tempering temperature,
are summarised below.
1. Tempering at 150°C increased the YS, an increase of
50–100 MPa being recorded (Fig. 1a). Above 150°C tempering,
the YS was reduced.
2. Tempering reduced the UTS (Fig. 1b). The drop in UTS
at 150°C tempering was small, between 20 and 70 MPa.
Tempering above 150°C brought about a relatively sharper
drop in UTS.
3. Except for a ‘slight’ drop in ductility at about 300–450°C,
noticeable only for 875 and 1000°C hardening treatments,
the ductility change did not follow distinct pattern (other than a YS; b UTS; c elongation
a possible general trend of a shallow increase) as a function 1 Mechanical properties of electroslag refining (ESR)
of tempering temperature. The ‘slight’ drop in ductility also modified steel type AFNOR 15CDV6 after given
falls within the possible experimental scatter. hardening and various tempering treatments: variations
in yield strength (YS), ultimate tensile strength (UTS)
and percentage elongation as function of tempering
Structure and microstructure
temperature
Austenitic grain sizes measured at various austenitising
temperatures are plotted in Fig. 2. Grain sizes were nearly some regions plate martensite with internal twins was also
identical for 875 and 925°C austenitising treatments, but observed (Figs. 3 and 4). The proportion of plate martensite
almost doubled at 1000°C austenitising. Other than this was estimated to be ~20%, which did not appear to depend
diVerence in grain size, the as hardened structures in both on the austenitising treatment. The other interesting feature
cases contained mostly bcc lath martensite, although in of the as hardened structure was the ‘occasional’ presence of
Table 1 Mechanical properties* commonly reported in heat treated conditions5– 8 for AFNOR 15CDV6 steel and electroslag
refining (ESR) modified grade
Steel UTS, MPa YS, MPa Elongation, % Fracture toughness, MPa m1/2
Table 2 Typical compositions of AFNOR 15CDV6 steel and ESR modified grade, wt-%
Steel C Si (max.) Mn P S Cr Mo Nb V Fe
AFNOR 15CDV6 0·15 0·25 0·90 0·03 0·03 1·40 0·90 … 0·25 Bal.
ESR modified 0·29 0·25 0·90 0·020 0·015 1·40 0·90 0·10 0·25 Bal.
DISCUSSION
Technoeconomic considerations of commercial satellite launch
vehicles require high performance steels at an aVordable price.
Type AFNOR 15CDV6 steel, a low carbon low alloy steel of b
French origin,1 is often used for fabricating components for
such applications.2 The problem with conventional 15CDV6
is its relatively poor yield strength (see Table 1), considered
inadequate for some speci c applications.2 The ESR modi ed
15CDV6 has provided an alternative material.5–8 It is possible
to produce a cleaner steel of higher carbon percentage and
higher YS and UTS, keeping almost the same ductility as
that of the conventionally processed 15CDV6.6–8 The present
study deals with the development of mechanical properties
and structure/microstructure, as a function of hardening/
tempering treatment, in this important new class of material.
Conventional 15CDV6 is reported7 to be a bainitic grade.
As shown in the present study, the ESR modi ed 15CDV6 c
is, however, martensitic. Since the presence of dislocated and
a bright field image; b diffraction pattern containing matrix (bcc lath, a)
twinned martensites has been established,9 martensites are and precipitate (hexagonal e) spots, schematic diagram of solution
generalised as laths or plates based on the notable absence is included; c relatively higher magnification (from region marked in
or presence of internal twins.11,12 The present material con- a by white cross) bright field image of precipitates
tained mostly lath martensite and ~20% plate martensite. A 6 Microstructure (TEM) of hardened and tempered
change in austenitising temperature brought about diVerences specimen: 875°C hardening followed by 150°C tempering
a
was observed, indicating no movement of grain boundaries,
either high or low angle, or no recovery/recrystallization
(see Fig. 8). The increase in relative misorientation at and
above 450°C and the observed change in lath morphology
(see Fig. 7a), on the other hand, strongly suggest the initiation
of at least recovery at these temperatures.
CONCLUSIONS
1. Unlike the conventionallyprocessed steel grade 15CDV6,
which is reported to be bainitic, the structure of the ESR
modi ed 15CDV6 is martensitic, with mostly lath martensite,
although ~20% plate martentsite was also observed. The
as hardened grain size nearly doubled between 875/925 and
1000°C austenitising, but otherwise the microstructures were
similar.
2. The estimated c/a ratio did not change noticeably at
150°C tempering. A strong drop in c/a ratio was noted
above 150°C, and a near complete loss of tetragonality was
observed at and above 300°C.
3. At 150°C tempering, signi cant e carbide (rodlike and
ne) precipitation was observed. The e carbide precipitation
b possibly explains a relative increase in yield strength at 150°C
a bright field image; b diffraction pattern corresponding to matrix tempering. Above 150°C tempering, e carbide was replaced
bcc lath, schematic diagram of spot indexing is included by cementite of similar morphology. At and above 500°C
7 Microstructure (TEM) of hardened and tempered tempering, M C precipitates were observed. All the carbides
specimen: 875°C hardening followed by 600°C tempering; contained Cr,23Fe6 and Mo.
relatively well ‘recovered’ laths (marked by white
4. Misorientation among adjacent laths did not change
cross in a) and carbides of M23 C6 type (marked by
white dot in a) were often observed at this condition until 450°C tempering; the average misorientation value was
8–9°. At and above 450°C tempering, in some regions of
the microstructure laths appeared to be ‘recovered’, and a
The present observation of the sharp drop in c/a ratio marked increase in misorientation was observed in both
at 150–300°C tempering and the near complete loss of laths and plates.
tetragonality at and above 300°C may be explained by the
strong presence of carbon and manganese. The sequence of
carbide precipitation, as observed in the present study, was: ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
e carbide Þ cementite Þ M C . It should be noted that in The authors would like to acknowledge the use of the RSIC
all the carbides, chromium and23 6molybdenum as well as iron (IIT Bombay) TEM facility and the mechanical testing facility
were observed by EDX, although exact quanti cation is of the Materials Characterisation Division of VSSC. Two of
questionable in the ne structures of e carbide and cementite. the authors (MRS and PPS) are grateful to the Director of
Although vanadium is expected to be a strong carbide former,10 VSSC for granting permission to publish the present study.
no evidence of VC or V C was observed in the present Partial nancial support from the Department of Science
heat treatment schedule. It 4 seems
3 that at and above 500°C, and Technology (DST) is also acknowledged.
only M C forms, and secondary hardening eVects on the
23 6 properties, through alloy carbide formation, is
mechanical REFERENCES
not re ected even at 600°C tempering (see Fig. 1). 1. ‘French norms for steel products (AFNOR–BNS)’, Vol. 1, Spec.
The other interesting issue in tempering is the high temper- no. A35–55A, Paris, France, 1978, 299.
ature recovery and recrystallisation.14,17 With the present 2. m. s. n. balasubramanian: ISRO–SLV(E) Mission, ‘15CDV6
combination of grade and heat treatment, until 450°C no steel for rocketry’, Internal technical report, VSSC, Trivandrum,
signi cant increase in misorientation among adjacent laths India, 1978.
3. k. sreekumar, m. s. p. murty, a. natarajan and p. p. sinha: 10. r. honeycombe and h. k. d. h. bhadeshia: ‘Steels microstructures
T rans. Indian Inst. Met., 1982, 35, 349. and properties’; 2nd edn, 171; 1995 London, Edward Arnold.
4. m. s. p. murty, b. r. ghosh and p. p. sinha: T rans. Indian Inst. 11. r. a. grange, c. r. hribal and l. f. porter: Metall. T rans. A,
Met., 1982, 35, 33. 1977, 8A, 1775.
5. m. chaterjee, m. s. n. balasubramanian, k. m. gupt and 12. l. j. habraken and m. econopoulos: Proc. Symp. on ‘Trans-
p. k. rao: Ironmaking Steelmaking, 1990, 17, 38. formation and hardenability in steels’, Ann Arbor, MI, USA,
6. g. m. padki, m. s. n. balasubramanian, k. m. gupt and p. k. rao: 1967, Climax Molybdenum Co., 88.
Ironmaking Steelmaking, 1983, 10, 180. 13. p. m. kelly and j. nutting: J. Iron Steel Inst., 1961, 197, 199.
7. m. chaterjee: PhD thesis, Department of Metallurgical Engineer- 14. g. r. speich and w. c. leslie: Metall. T rans., 1972, 3, 1043.
ing, IIT Bombay, India, 1989. 15. y. h. tan, d. c. zeng, x. c. dong, y. h. he and s. q. hu: Metall.
8. m. chaterjee, m. s. n. balasubramanian, k. m. gupt and T rans. A, 1992, 23A, 1413.
p. k. rao: Ironmaking Steelmaking, 1994, 21, 399. 16. g. r. speich: T rans. AIME, 1969, 245, 2553.
9. s. d. prokoshkin, l. m. kaputkina, m. l. bernshteyn and 17. d. huang and g. thomas: Metall. T rans., 1971, 2, 1587.
v. y. mozzhukhin: Phys. Met. Metall., 1983, 55, (6), 99. 18. g. v. kurdjumov: J. Iron Steel Inst., 1960, 195, 26.