Addie Model For Development of E-Courses
Addie Model For Development of E-Courses
Abstract:
Dalibor Drljača1,
This paper gives a review of ADDIE model used in the preparation of teach-
Branko Latinović2, ing materials for use in electronically supported teaching process generally,
Željko Stanković2, and especially for electronic learning. ADDIE model proved itself as the
very useful instructional model in preparation of materials for traditional
Dragan Cvetković3
teaching and there is a strong intention to use this model for electronic and
on-line teaching materials.
1
Europrojekt centar,
Banja Luka
Keywords:
2
Apeiron University,
Banja Luka ADDIE model, instructional model, e-Learning, materials.
3
Singidunum University,
Belgrade
1. INTRODUCTION
for the creation of learning materials. The name is an questions dealing with: course design, target groups,
acronym of the phrase - Analyse, Design, Develop, Imple- learning objectives, content identification, presentation
ment, Evaluate [6] environment for content (on-line, on-demand, vis-à-vis,
It is important to emphasize that the creation of a printed, CD...), teaching and learning strategies, other
course in this model is an iterative process (repetitive) possible limitations. Very important question is also - how
during which the creator of the course can return to any to ensure the quality of the whole process?
previous stage of course development, depending on The analysis refers to the gathering of information
the results of the evaluation carried out in all stages of about one’s audience, the tasks to be completed, how the
development, but also at the end of the course. learners will view the content, and the project’s overall
ADDIE model does not suggest follow-up of any of goals. Upon collection, instructional designer can classify
the three theories of learning but represents a project the information to make more effective and applicable
management tool that helps in the preparation of the e- content.
course and instructional design taking into account all Some common tasks and questions related to this
the factors that may affect the quality of course. stage are:
◆◆ To define the overall background of students
Analysis (personal and educational information, age, na-
tionality, previous experience and interests).
◆◆ To define learning outcomes and learning needs
The analysis is the first step of ADDIE model in the
(what results should be achieved, what knowl-
design of courses and teaching materials for on-line teach-
edge should be adopted…)
ing and learning. At this stage, it is necessary to create the
◆◆ To define adequate learning environment and
“overall picture” of the instructional design integrity. This
delivery options (virtual, live, on-line discus-
is a “contemplative” stage where it is necessary to think
sions, face-to-face, blend)
about the student-centered approach for the design of
course or of materials. The analysis, in fact, presents a ◆◆ To define learners’ knowledge and skills required
“planning phase” in which it is necessary to identify the (specific skills required or not, skills in case of
basic parameters that will be traceable in other phases disabled persons participating…)
of the ADDIE model. The adopted parameters must be ◆◆ To define all pedagogical considerations, espe-
quantitatively and qualitatively defined as much as possi- cially in the case of on-line course (adequacy of
ble for the purpose of evaluation in all other phases of the selected approach, adequacy of selected method-
model and after implementation based on the feedback ology, constraints…)
from students and the thinking of teachers who realise ◆◆ To define overall project objectives (instructional
the educational process. goals, learning goals, teaching goals…)
◆◆ To define necessary resources for the project
(technical, human, time, skills…) as well as their
influence on effectiveness and achievement of
project objectives.
Design
In the design stage, it is necessary to create a draft or Development implies close cooperation between the
framework of the course and to start with the construc- author of the course and the person in charge of the
tion of course structure. This means that it is necessary to technical performance of the material for the course
have all and accurate guidelines for the creation of course will be set to “on-line” mode. This involves teamwork,
structure as defined during analysis phase including the except in the case where the teacher is also the supplier
schedule on the unfolding of the course, the arrange- of multimedia content prepared for a specific platform,
ment of individual lessons during the course, the shape for example, LCMS (Learning Content Management Sys-
of the teaching strategy and all necessary resources to in tem). This phase this is very important synergy between
accordance with the given schedule. teacher and content producer, in cases where teachers
Design phase includes additional detailed planning are not managing creation and maintenance of course
of the following: materials. The teacher must be able to transform a vision
◆◆ Educational goals, or learning objectives, of a class in order to set up such virtual classroom with
all required functionalities.
◆◆ Educational content (lessons),
◆◆ Methods, Given the technical possibilities of LCMS, it is neces-
sary to obtain and prepare the technology for presenting
◆◆ Selected method and frequency of assessment,
the content, interactions with students, as well as to plan
◆◆ Use of on-line technologies for knowledge pres-
activities for students’ teamwork and work at home, or
entation,
“off-line”.
◆◆ Methods and frequency of communication with
The Development phase is all about putting it into
participants (target group).
action. This phase includes three main tasks: drafting,
Some common tasks and questions related to this
production and evaluation. Development thus involves
stage are:
creating and testing of learning outcomes.
◆◆ To define the type of media used (audio/video/
Some common tasks and questions related to this
graphics, own or third party…)
stage are:
◆◆ To define teacher’s style approach (behaviourist,
◆◆ Ensure teamwork of all (optimal capacity per-
constructivist etc.)
formance by all involved, effective work of all
◆◆ To define the level and types of activities gener-
members…)
ated by the study (collaborative, interactive, in-
◆◆ Ensure timely submission and preparation of
dividual…)
learning materials (creation of materials per de-
◆◆ To define a timeframe for each activity (hours,
fined schedule, in time preparations…)
lessons, modules, scalability, and dependencies
◆◆ Ensure production of materials per task intended
in workflow…)
for (no extra work or sufficient materials should
◆◆ To define precisely skills and knowledge devel-
appear).
oped (mental skills, cognitive skills…)
◆◆ Ensure prototyping for evaluation purposes (test-
◆◆ In the case of web-based e-learning, complete
ing, checking, and making possible corrections)
definition of user interface (look of the site, func-
tionalities…)
5. IMPLEMENTATION
◆◆ To define feedback mechanisms on digestion of
the lessons (technical solutions, questionnaires,
brief exams…) The implementation phase represents the first test of
making the entire course and is therefore recommended
to divide this phase conditionally into two parts: a test im-
4. DEVELOPMENT
plementation phase and final implementation phase. Test
implementation should confirm the integrity and func-
The development phase involves the transition from tionality of the created course and the accompanying ma-
the “contemplative” to “physical” implementation. At this terials and access to the exchange rate at the moment are
stage, the final structure and content of the course are cre- limited to the teachers and administrators of the system,
ated in accordance with all the elements and parameters possibly to test-users. If the integrity and functionality of
defined in the previous two phases. the course are confirmed, then the course can be officially
in “on-line” mode and available to all students accredited
245
Sinteza 2017
Information Technology in Education
submit your manuscript | www.sinteza.singidunum.ac.rs
SINTEZA 2017
INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND DATA RELATED RESEARCH
for access. The final means of implementation in addition ◆◆ To define data collection policy (including strat-
to setting “on-line” mode, and preparing students for the egy, timing, frequency, tools…)
use of educational materials and technology, but also for ◆◆ To ensure analysis of feedback from all partici-
information on all the details of implementation of the pants in the system (instructors, students, …)
course, especially about its structure and dynamics tests. ◆◆ To set-up quality assurance tools for clarity of
During the implementation phase, a procedure for instructions, reliability and content validity (dif-
training the facilitators and the learners is developed. ferent tools or the same)
The facilitators’ training should cover the course cur- ◆◆ To define final output and holder of report prep-
riculum, learning outcomes, a method of delivery, and aration (will it be an instructor, manager, …)
testing procedures. Preparation of the learners includes
training them on new tools (software or hardware), stu-
7. WEAKNESS OF ADDIE MODEL
dent registration.
This is also the phase where the project manager en-
This model has been primarily used for years to de-
sures that the books, hands on equipment, tools, CD-
velop multimedia learning content, as other models also
ROMs and software are in place and that the learning
revealed some weaknesses in realisation. Probably the
application or Web site is functional.
biggest problem with this model is the assumption that
Some common tasks and questions related to this the author knows in advance all the requirements, or
stage are: even before the development of the content, but these
◆◆ To evaluate the emotional feedback from teach- deficiencies are as follows [9]:
ers and students during initial demonstration of 1. typical processes require an unrealistic and com-
the project (genuinely interested, eager, critical prehensive analysis in advance,
or resistant)
2. Ignoring the policy of reality causes strong likeli-
◆◆ To prepare backup plans for any possible error
hood that vital resource will be missing and will
during testing (format of media, convertors, …)
use a high degree of improvisation in implemen-
tation,
6. EVALUATION 3. The details of the process are set so that creativity
presents an obstacle,
ADDIE model makes it possible to define two types 4. The inconvenience of dealing with errors or good
of evaluation: intermediate (formative) and summative ideas in the process,
(see Figure 2).
5. The learning program is designed to meet the
measured criteria (schedule, costs, pass), but it is
not able to track behavioural change,
6. Post-tests provide little useful information that
would help improve the teaching and learning
process.
8. CONCLUSION
246
Sinteza 2017
Information Technology in Education
submit your manuscript | www.sinteza.singidunum.ac.rs
SINTEZA 2017
INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND DATA RELATED RESEARCH
Contemporary requirements for the course in elec- [3] Katarina Milosavljević „Učenje na daljinu i
tronic form require great flexibility and adaptability to e-učenje“, časopis „Partner u učenju elektronski
the needs of the target group of students. It is necessary to časopis za nastavnike“, Microsoft Srbija Beograd,
properly design/construct the course and accompanying pp.1-4, 2007
educational materials in order to meet these requirements. [4] Nataša Popović, Elektrotehnički fakultet, Istočno
One of the solutions that compete to succeed ADDIE Sarajevo, Milica Naumović, Elektronski fakultet,
Niš „Realizacija elektronskog kursa iz upravljačkih
model, especially in the field of e-learning and teaching
sistema u MOODLE okruženju“, INFOTEH-
is the SAM (Successive Approximation Model, formerly JAHORINA Vol. 8, Ref. E-II-11, pp. 511-515, 2009
called SAVVY process) that includes prototyping. The
[5] R. K. Branson, G. T. Rayner, J. L. Cox, J. P. Fur-
success of SAM lies in the fact that it follows modern agile man, F. J. King, W. H. Hannum, “Interservice pro-
development principles. The most important difference is cedures for instructional systems development” (5
that SAM looks for iteration in development with repeated vols.) (TRADOC Pam 350-30 NAVEDTRA 106A).
small steps and prototyping, instead perfectly executed big Ft. Monroe, VA: U.S. Army Training and Doctrine
steps. Small, purposeful and iterative steps are facilitating Command, August 1975. (NTIS No. ADA 019 486
analysis and evaluation processes that clarify pathways to through ADA 019 490)
successful design. This gives SAM advantage in respect [6] R. A. Reiser and J. V. Dempsey, “Trends and issues
of creation of performance-driven learning. in instructional design and technology”, Boston:
Pearson, 2012
[7] Website, Educational Technology, http://education-
REFERENCES altechnology.net/the-addie-model-instructional-
design (accessed on 1.3.2106.)
[1] M. D. Merrill, L. Drake, M. J. Lacy and J. Pratt [8] Steven J. McGriff „Instructional System Design
, “Reclaiming instructional design”, Educational (ISD): Using the ADDIE Model“ Instructional Sys-
Technology 36 (5): 5–7, 1996 tems, College of Education, Penn State University,
[2] M. Mušanović, “Konstruktivistička teorija i obra- 2000
zovni process”, Zbornik skupa: Didaktični in [9] Michael W. Allen, “Leaving the ADDIE Model Be-
metodični vidiki nadaljnega razvoja izobraževanja, hind”, Allen Interactions, 2009
Maribor, Univerza v Mariboru, Pedagoška fakulteta
Mariboru, pp.28-35, 2000
247
Sinteza 2017
Information Technology in Education
submit your manuscript | www.sinteza.singidunum.ac.rs