IESL Transactions 2019 Part B - Technical Papers 60

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 1

of the roads with route buses and without route

Average NTF Variation with Traffic


buses are compared in the analysis. It gives a
1.40 Volume
clear indication that the composition of the
motor bikes and three wheelers are low in the Below 1000
roads with bus routes. The model shift of the 1.30 1000-2000
users is observed from motorbikes and three

Avg. NTF
Over 2000
wheelers to the buses where available. 1.20 All Roads
Composition of the cars when the route buses
are available is high so that it does not relate 1.10
with the availability of route buses and it’s
clearly seen that the motorbike and the three 1.00
wheelers are used heavily in the absence of 24/12 24/16
route buses as an alternative to fulfil their Factor type
mobility needs. Figure 10: Variation of NTF with Traffic Volume
Avalability of Route Buses vs
Vehicle Composition When the traffic composition variation with
respect to the traffic volumes is considered it’s
80% clearly seen that composition of the four
Bus
wheelers is increased with a considerable level
Non Bus at the roads where its traffic volume is higher
Composition

60%
than 2000 vehicles per 24 hours on a normal
working day while the composition of the
40% motor bikes is reduced. Three-wheeler
composition is steady around 20% despite the
20% traffic volume variation.

Variation of Composition with


0%
Vehicle Type 80.0%
Traffic Volume
MCL TWL CAR & VAN
Figure 9: Variation of Traffic Composition with 70.0% Below 1000
availability of Public Transport
60.0% 1000-2000
Composition

5.4. Variation of Traffic Behaviour with 50.0% Above 2000


Respect to the Traffic Volume 40.0%
30.0%
The traffic volumes of the considered roads are
in a wide range from 42 vehicles to 4,754 20.0%
vehicles per 24 hours having an average of 909 10.0%
vehicles. Therefore, this analysis is done in
0.0%
order to check the variation of the average
MCL TWL CAR &
Night Time Factor and vehicle composition
VAN
with respect to the traffic volume. Vehicle Type
Although the traffic volumes are varied Figure 11: Variation of Vehicle Composition
significantly in the observed data, as per the with Traffic Volume
analysis it shows that there is no significant
variation in the average night time factor of
5.5. Variation of Traffic behaviour with
both 12 hours and 16 hours day traffics with the
variations of traffic volume. Respect to the Connectivity of
Roads
Table 5.5: Variation of NTF with Traffic Volume
Average NTF Variation with Traffic The connectivity of a road also plays a major
Volume role in the traffic behaviour of a road. Therefore,
Type
Below 1000- Over All the connectivity of the roads is considered as a
1000 2000 2000 Roads variable factor to analyse the variation of the
24/12 1.34 1.33 1.35 1.34 average Night Time Factor (NTF) and the
vehicle composition.
24/16 1.04 1.05 1.05 1.04 As per the analysis, the average NTF with
respect to 12 hours daily traffic is varied

ENGINEER 44
6

You might also like