Core J2EE Patterns - Data Access Object
Core J2EE Patterns - Data Access Object
Account Sign Out Help Country Communities I am a... I want to... Search
Java TV Typically, applications use shared distributed components such as entity beans to represent persistent data. An application is considered to employ
bean-managed persistence (BMP) for its entity beans when these entity beans explicitly access the persistent storage-the entity bean includes code
New to Java
to directly access the persistent storage. An application with simpler requirements may forego using entity beans and instead use session beans or
Community servlets to directly access the persistent storage to retrieve and modify the data. Or, the application could use entity beans with container-managed
Java Magazine persistence, and thus let the container handle the transaction and persistent details.
Applications can use the JDBC API to access data residing in a relational database management system (RDBMS). The JDBC API enables standard
access and manipulation of data in persistent storage, such as a relational database. The JDBC API enables J2EE applications to use SQL
statements, which are the standard means for accessing RDBMS tables. However, even within an RDBMS environment, the actual syntax and format
of the SQL statements may vary depending on the particular database product.
There is even greater variation with different types of persistent storage. Access mechanisms, supported APIs, and features vary between different
types of persistent stores such as RDBMS, object-oriented databases, flat files, and so forth. Applications that need to access data from a legacy or
disparate system (such as a mainframe, or B2B service) are often required to use APIs that may be proprietary. Such disparate data sources offer
challenges to the application and can potentially create a direct dependency between application code and data access code. When business
components-entity beans, session beans, and even presentation components like servlets and helper objects for JavaServer Pages (JSP) pages --
need to access a data source, they can use the appropriate API to achieve connectivity and manipulate the data source. But including the
connectivity and data access code within these components introduces a tight coupling between the components and the data source
implementation. Such code dependencies in components make it difficult and tedious to migrate the application from one type of data source to
another. When the data source changes, the components need to be changed to handle the new type of data source.
Forces
Components such as bean-managed entity beans, session beans, servlets, and other objects like helpers for JSP pages need to retrieve and store
information from persistent stores and other data sources like legacy systems, B2B, LDAP, and so forth.
Persistent storage APIs vary depending on the product vendor. Other data sources may have APIs that are nonstandard and/or proprietary. These
APIs and their capabilities also vary depending on the type of storage-RDBMS, object-oriented database management system (OODBMS), XML
documents, flat files, and so forth. There is a lack of uniform APIs to address the requirements to access such disparate systems.
Components typically use proprietary APIs to access external and/or legacy systems to retrieve and store data.
Portability of the components is directly affected when specific access mechanisms and APIs are included in the components.
Components need to be transparent to the actual persistent store or data source implementation to provide easy migration to different vendor
products, different storage types, and different data source types.
Solution
Use a Data Access Object (DAO) to abstract and encapsulate all access to the data source. The DAO manages the connection with the data
source to obtain and store data.
The DAO implements the access mechanism required to work with the data source. The data source could be a persistent store like an RDBMS, an
external service like a B2B exchange, a repository like an LDAP database, or a business service accessed via CORBA Internet Inter-ORB Protocol
(IIOP) or low-level sockets. The business component that relies on the DAO uses the simpler interface exposed by the DAO for its clients. The DAO
completely hides the data source implementation details from its clients. Because the interface exposed by the DAO to clients does not change when
the underlying data source implementation changes, this pattern allows the DAO to adapt to different storage schemes without affecting its clients or
business components. Essentially, the DAO acts as an adapter between the component and the data source.
Structure
Figure 9.1 shows the class diagram representing the relationships for the DAO pattern.
BusinessObject
The BusinessObject represents the data client. It is the object that requires access to the data source to obtain and store data. A BusinessObject may
be implemented as a session bean, entity bean, or some other Java object, in addition to a servlet or helper bean that accesses the data source.
DataAccessObject
The DataAccessObject is the primary object of this pattern. The DataAccessObject abstracts the underlying data access implementation for the
BusinessObject to enable transparent access to the data source. The BusinessObject also delegates data load and store operations to the
DataAccessObject.
DataSource
This represents a data source implementation. A data source could be a database such as an RDBMS, OODBMS, XML repository, flat file system,
and so forth. A data source can also be another system (legacy/mainframe), service (B2B service or credit card bureau), or some kind of repository
(LDAP).
TransferObject
This represents a Transfer Object used as a data carrier. The DataAccessObject may use a Transfer Object to return data to the client. The
DataAccessObject may also receive the data from the client in a Transfer Object to update the data in the data source.
Strategies
Automatic DAO Code Generation Strategy
Since each BusinessObject corresponds to a specific DAO, it is possible to establish relationships between the BusinessObject, DAO, and underlying
implementations (such as the tables in an RDBMS). Once the relationships are established, it is possible to write a simple application-specific code-
generation utility that generates the code for all DAOs required by the application. The metadata to generate the DAO can come from a developer-
defined descriptor file. Alternatively, the code generator can automatically introspect the database and provide the necessary DAOs to access the
database. If the requirements for DAOs are sufficiently complex, consider using third-party tools that provide object-to-relational mapping for RDBMS
databases. These tools typically include GUI tools to map the business objects to the persistent storage objects and thereby define the intermediary
DAOs. The tools automatically generate the code once the mapping is complete, and may provide other value-added features such as results
caching, query caching, integration with application servers, integration with other third-party products (e.g., distributed caching), and so forth.
The DAO pattern can be made highly flexible by adopting the Abstract Factory [GoF] and the Factory Method [GoF] patterns (see "Related Patterns"
in this chapter).
When the underlying storage is not subject to change from one implementation to another, this strategy can be implemented using the Factory
Method pattern to produce a number of DAOs needed by the application. The class diagram for this case is shown in Figure 9.3.
Figure 9.3 Factory for Data Access Object strategy using Factory Method
When the underlying storage is subject to change from one implementation to another, this strategy may be implemented using the Abstract Factory
pattern. The Abstract Factory can in turn build on and use the Factory Method implementation, as suggested in Design Patterns: Elements of
Reusable Object-Oriented Software [GoF]. In this case, this strategy provides an abstract DAO factory object (Abstract Factory) that can construct
various types of concrete DAO factories, each factory supporting a different type of persistent storage implementation. Once you obtain the concrete
DAO factory for a specific implementation, you use it to produce DAOs supported and implemented in that implementation.
The class diagram for this strategy is shown in Figure 9.4. This class diagram shows a base DAO factory, which is an abstract class that is inherited
and implemented by different concrete DAO factories to support storage implementation-specific access. The client can obtain a concrete DAO
factory implementation such as RdbDAOFactory and use it to obtain concrete DAOs that work with that specific storage implementation. For
example, the data client can obtain an RdbDAOFactory and use it to get specific DAOs such as RdbCustomerDAO, RdbAccountDAO, and so forth.
The DAOs can extend and implement a generic base class (shown as DAO1 and DAO2) that specifically describe the DAO requirements for the
business object it supports. Each concrete DAO is responsible for connecting to the data source and obtaining and manipulating data for the
business object it supports.
The sample implementation for the DAO pattern and its strategies is shown in the "Sample Code" section of this chapter.
Figure 9.4 Factory for Data Access Object strategy using Abstract Factory
The sequence diagram describing the interactions for this strategy is shown in Figure 9.5.
Figure 9.5 Factory for Data Access Objects using Abstract Factory sequence diagram
Consequences
Enables Transparency
Business objects can use the data source without knowing the specific details of the data source's implementation. Access is transparent because
the implementation details are hidden inside the DAO.
Enables Easier Migration
A layer of DAOs makes it easier for an application to migrate to a different database implementation. The business objects have no knowledge of the
underlying data implementation. Thus, the migration involves changes only to the DAO layer. Further, if employing a factory strategy, it is possible to
provide a concrete factory implementation for each underlying storage implementation. In this case, migrating to a different storage implementation
means providing a new factory implementation to the application.
Reduces Code Complexity in Business ObjectsBecause the DAOs manage all the data access complexities, it simplifies the code in the business
objects and other data clients that use the DAOs. All implementation-related code (such as SQL statements) is contained in the DAO and not in the
business object. This improves code readability and development productivity.
Centralizes All Data Access into a Separate Layer
Because all data access operations are now delegated to the DAOs, the separate data access layer can be viewed as the layer that can isolate the
rest of the application from the data access implementation. This centralization makes the application easier to maintain and manage.
Not Useful for Container-Managed Persistence
Because the EJB container manages entity beans with container-managed persistence (CMP), the container automatically services all persistent
storage access. Applications using container-managed entity beans do not need a DAO layer, since the application server transparently provides this
functionality. However, DAOs are still useful when a combination of CMP (for entity beans) and BMP (for session beans, servlets) is required.
Adds Extra Layer
The DAOs create an additional layer of objects between the data client and the data source that need to be designed and implemented to leverage
the benefits of this pattern. But the benefit realized by choosing this approach pays off for the additional effort.
Needs Class Hierarchy Design
When using a factory strategy, the hierarchy of concrete factories and the hierarchy of concrete products produced by the factories need to be
designed and implemented. This additional effort needs to be considered if there is sufficient justification warranting such flexibility. This increases the
complexity of the design. However, you can choose to implement the factory strategy starting with the Factory Method pattern first, and then move
towards the Abstract Factory if necessary.
Sample Code
Implementing Data Access Object pattern
An example DAO code for a persistent object that represents Customer information is shown in Example 9.4. The CloudscapeCustomerDAO creates
a Customer Transfer Object when the findCustomer() method is invoked.
The sample code to use the DAO is shown in Example 9.6. The class diagram for this example is shown in Figure 9.6.
Figure 9.6 Implementing the DAO pattern
Consider an example where we are implementing this strategy in which a DAO factory produces many DAOs for a single database implementation
(e.g., Oracle). The factory produces DAOs such as CustomerDAO, AccountDAO, OrderDAO, and so forth. The class diagram for this example is
shown in Figure 9.7.
Figure 9.7 Implementing the Factory for DAO strategy using Factory Method
The example code for the DAO factory (CloudscapeDAOFactory) is listed in Example 9.2.
Consider an example where we are considering implementing this strategy for three different databases. In this case, the Abstract Factory pattern
can be employed. The class diagram for this example is shown in Figure 9.8. The sample code in Example 9.1 shows code excerpt for the abstract
DAOFactory class. This factory produces DAOs such as CustomerDAO, AccountDAO, OrderDAO, and so forth. This strategy uses the Factory
Method implementation in the factories produced by the Abstract Factory.
Figure 9.8 Implementing the Factory for DAO strategy using Abstract Factory Example 9.1 Abstract DAOFactory Class
// Abstract class DAO Factory
public abstract class DAOFactory {
switch (whichFactory) {
case CLOUDSCAPE:
return new CloudscapeDAOFactory();
case ORACLE :
return new OracleDAOFactory();
case SYBASE :
return new SybaseDAOFactory();
...
default :
return null;
}
}
}
The sample code for CloudscapeDAOFactory is shown in Example 9.2. The implementation for OracleDAOFactory and SybaseDAOFactory are
similar except for specifics of each implementation, such as JDBC driver, database URL, and differences in SQL syntax, if any.
The CustomerDAO interface shown in Example 9.3 defines the DAO methods for Customer persistent object that are implemented by all concrete
DAO implementations, such as CloudscapeCustomerDAO, OracleCustomerDAO, and SybaseCustomerDAO. Similar, but not listed here, are
AccountDAO and OrderDAO interfaces that define the DAO methods for Account and Order business objects respectively.
The CloudscapeCustomerDAO implements the CustomerDAO as shown in Example 9.4. The implementation of other DAOs, such as
CloudscapeAccountDAO, CloudscapeOrderDAO, OracleCustomerDAO, OracleAccountDAO, and so forth, are similar.
import java.sql.*;
public CloudscapeCustomerDAO() {
// initialization
}
The Customer Transfer Object class is shown in Example 9.5. This is used by the DAOs to send and receive data from the clients. The usage of
Transfer Objects is discussed in detail in the Transfer Object pattern.
Example 9.6 shows the usage of the DAO factory and the DAO. If the implementation changes from Cloudscape to another product, the only required
change is the getDAOFactory() method call to the DAO factory to obtain a different factory.
...
// create the required DAO Factory
DAOFactory cloudscapeFactory =
DAOFactory.getDAOFactory(DAOFactory.DAOCLOUDSCAPE);
// Create a DAO
CustomerDAO custDAO =
cloudscapeFactory.getCustomerDAO();
// create a new customer
int newCustNo = custDAO.insertCustomer(...);
...
Related Patterns
Transfer Object
A DAO uses Transfer Objects to transport data to and from its clients.
Factory Method [GoF] and Abstract Factory [GoF]
The Factory for Data Access Objects Strategy uses the Factory Method pattern to implement the concrete factories and its products (DAOs). For
added flexibility, the Abstract Factory pattern may be employed as discussed in the strategies.
Broker [POSA1]
The DAO pattern is related to the Broker pattern, which describes approaches for decoupling clients and servers in distributed systems. The DAO
pattern more specifically applies this pattern to decouple the resource tier from clients in another tier, such as the business or presentation tier
Java ME
Java Card
NetBeans IDE
Java Resources
Java APIs
Technical Articles
Forums
Java Magazine
Java.net
Developer Training
Tutorials
Java.com
E-mail this page Printer View
ORACLE CLOUD JAVA CUSTOMERS AND EVENTS COMMUNITIES SERVICES AND STORE
Learn About Oracle Cloud Learn About Java Explore and Read Customer Blogs Log In to My Oracle Support
Get a Free Trial Download Java for Consumers Stories Discussion Forums Training and Certification
Learn About PaaS Download Java for Developers All Oracle Events Wikis Become a Partner
Learn About SaaS Java Resources for Developers Oracle OpenWorld Oracle ACEs Find a Partner Solution
Learn About IaaS Java Cloud Service JavaOne User Groups Purchase from the Oracle Store
Java Magazine Social Media Channels
CONTACT AND CHAT
Phone: +1.800.633.0738
Global Contacts
Oracle Support
Partner Support
Subscribe Careers Contact Us Site Maps Legal Notices Terms of Use Privacy Cookie PreferencesCookie Preferences Oracle Mobile