See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

net/publication/373977477

Impact of Quantum Computing in Quantum Supremacy and Parallel Universes

Preprint · September 2023

DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.20552.70401

CITATIONS READS
0 318

1 author:

Rabab Khan Rongon

International University of Business Agriculture and Technology
7 PUBLICATIONS 0 CITATIONS

SEE PROFILE

All content following this page was uploaded by Rabab Khan Rongon on 16 September 2023.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.

 Impact of Quantum Computing in Quantum
Supremacy and Parallel Universes
Rabab Khan Rongon
Department of Computer Science and Engineering
School of Engineering and Technology
IUBAT - International University of Business Agriculture and Technology
Dhaka, Bangladesh
191031iubat.edu

Abstract—This research investigates the profound implications fathom the multifaceted ramifications of attaining Quantum
of quantum computing on the interplay between Quantum Supremacy, and probes the tantalizing prospect of parallel
Supremacy and the concept of Parallel Universes. Quantum universes, synchronized harmoniously within the tapestry of
computing, characterized by its remarkable parallel process-
ing capabilities, has the potential to reshape the landscape quantum computation. There are 8 possible three-bit combi-
of computation. The objective of this study is to explore the nations: 000, 001, 010, 011, 100, 101, 110, 111. The number 8
potential consequences of achieving Quantum Supremacy and comes from 23. There are two choices for the first bit, two for
how it relates to our understanding of quantum mechanics the second and two for the third, and we multiply these three 2s
and the existence of parallel universes. This study employs a together. If instead of bits we switch to qubits, each of these 8
multidisciplinary approach, combining insights from quantum
physics, computer science, and philosophy. It critically analyzes three-bit strings is associated with a basis vector, so the vector
the theoretical foundations and computational methodologies that space is 8-dimensional. Exactly the same analysis tells us that
underpin Quantum Supremacy and its implications for parallel if we have n qubits, then we will have 2n basis vectors, and the
universes. The findings suggest that quantum computing, once space will be 2n dimensional. As the number of qubits grows,
it reaches the threshold of Quantum Supremacy, may usher in the number of basis vectors grows exponentially, and things
a transformative era with significant computational advantages.
Furthermore, it illuminates the interconnected nature of quantum quickly get big. If we have 72 qubits, the number of basis
mechanics and the concept of parallel universes, opening up elements is 272 . This is about 4,000,000,000,000,000,000,000.
new avenues for investigation and simulation. The study un- It is a large number and is considered to be around the
derscores the need for continued interdisciplinary exploration point at which classical computers cannot simulate quantum
in the evolving quantum technology landscape. In conclusion, computers. Once quantum computers have more than 72 or
this research sheds light on the potential transformative effects
of quantum computing on our comprehension of the quantum so qubits we will enter the age of quantum supremacy—when
realm and its capacity to reshape our worldview, emphasizing the quantum computers can do computations that are beyond the
importance of maintaining a clear and structured approach in ability of any classical computer. As we mentioned earlier, it
scientific communication while avoiding personal pronouns and is expected that Google is about to announce that this age has
abbreviations. been reached. D-Wave has 2,000 qubits in its latest computer.
Index Terms—Multidisciplinary Research; Parallel Universes;
Quantum Computing; Quantum Supremacy; Quantum Technol-
However, this specialized machine has not been able to do
ogy anything that cannot be done by a conventional computer, so
it hasn’t broken the quantum supremacy barrier.
I. I NTRODUCTION II. L ITERATURE R EVIEW
The emergence of quantum computing has heralded a seis- The expansive literature corpus encompassing quantum
mic shift in the landscape of computational science, promis- computing, quantum supremacy, and the enigmatic role of
ing a quantum leap in processing capabilities by harness- parallel universes represents a multifaceted tapestry of re-
ing the enigmatic principles of quantum mechanics. This search and discourse. At its foundation lie seminal works
epochal technological breakthrough portends the redefinition by luminaries such as Richard Feynman and David Deutsch,
of computational boundaries, marking the advent of Quantum whose visionary contributions elucidate the fundamental prin-
Supremacy—a pivotal juncture where quantum computers ciples of quantum computing. Google’s audacious claim of
outpace their classical counterparts in executing specialized attaining quantum supremacy in 2019 through its 53-qubit
computational tasks. In our quest to fathom the intricate Sycamore processor marks a watershed moment, igniting a
terrain of quantum computing, the exponential proliferation fervent scholarly debate. Equally captivating is the realm of
of computational space, congruent with the escalation of parallel universes, an evocative concept birthed from Hugh
qubits, poses a formidable challenge to classical simulation. Everett’s Many-Worlds Interpretation, which boldly challenges
This comprehensive research embarks on an odyssey through conventional quantum paradigms and finds resonance in the
the foundational pillars of quantum computing, endeavors to work of proponents like David Deutsch. Amidst this in-
tellectual maelstrom, the exponential expansion of quantum transcend the computational boundaries that have heretofore
computational space as qubit counts ascend to stratospheric confined their classical counterparts. The audacious notion
heights stands as a central theme, inviting inquiries into of parallel universes, albeit a minority interpretation within
the elusive threshold where classical computational simulacra the quantum paradigm, ascends to prominence through the
falter. This literature also resonates with discussions revolving seminal contributions of David Deutsch in the field of quantum
around quantum error correction, the incipient development of computing. The tantalizing prospect of future tests, akin to
quantum algorithms, and the ethical quandaries entwined with Bell’s test, augments the allure of exploring and substantiating
the emergence of quantum supremacy. As a tapestry woven the existence of these parallel dimensions. The study has
with the threads of theory, experimentation, and philosophical unveiled a remarkable landscape within the realm of quantum
contemplation, this literature underscores the transformative computing and quantum supremacy. Google’s claim of achiev-
potential of quantum technology and its capacity to irrevocably ing quantum supremacy with its 53-qubit Sycamore processor
reshape our understanding of quantum mechanics, computa- in 2019 marked a significant milestone, demonstrating that
tion, and the very fabric of our universe. In this narrative, the quantum computers could indeed surpass classical counter-
quest for experimental validation of parallel universes, akin to parts in specialized computational tasks. This achievement
Bell’s test for quantum entanglement, emerges as a tantalizing sparked intense debate within the scientific community, paving
frontier, holding the promise of unveiling profound insights the way for further exploration and experimentation in the
into the multifaceted quantum cosmos. field. The findings of this study underscore the transformative
potential of quantum computing, particularly in the context of
III. R ESEARCH M ETHODOLOGY achieving quantum supremacy. As qubit counts increase, the
Quantum computing, grounded in the esoteric principles exponential growth of quantum computational space becomes
of quantum mechanics, ushers in a new era of computation increasingly evident, pushing the boundaries of classical sim-
through the revolutionary concept of qubits. With n qubits ulation. The literature review also highlights the concept of
in tow, a 2n -dimensional vector space unfurls, representing parallel universes, rooted in Hugh Everett’s Many-Worlds
an astonishing computational expanse. This sprawling com- Interpretation, as a compelling but minority view within
putational realm assumes paramount significance as quantum the quantum realm. Researchers like David Deutsch have
computers approach the pivotal threshold of 72 qubits, a championed this interpretation, envisioning parallel universes
juncture where classical computing power struggles to mirror collaborating in quantum computation.
their quantum analogs. As the quantum revolution unfolds, the
specter of machines boasting hundreds or even thousands of V. D ISCUSSION
qubits beckons, giving rise to profound inquiries concerning The discussion surrounding these findings revolves around
the plausibility of computations that exceed the sum total of the dynamic and evolving nature of quantum computing.
particles within the known universe. This scholarly inquiry The attainment of quantum supremacy challenges conven-
adheres meticulously to a structured framework, abiding by tional computational paradigms and holds immense promise
the prescribed rules of eschewing abbreviations and personal for fields such as cryptography, optimization, and scientific
pronouns in favor of the unwavering embrace of a third- simulations. However, it also poses challenges, including the
person passive voice. The research scaffolds its intellectual need for quantum error correction and algorithm development
edifice by conducting a comprehensive exploration of the to fully harness quantum computational power.
foundational tenets underpinning quantum computing, Quan- Parallel universes remain a thought-provoking topic, with
tum Supremacy, and the momentous exponential expansion of the potential for experimental tests that could substantiate or
computational terrain corresponding to an escalating tally of refute their existence. While still a minority interpretation,
qubits. the debate around parallel universes continues to stimulate
In traversing the contours of quantum computing and prob- philosophical and scientific discourse, underscoring the ever-
ing the frontiers of Quantum Supremacy, this research nego- expanding frontiers of quantum computing.
tiates the juncture where classical conventions intersect with
quantum possibilities. The inquisitive spirit of David Deutsch, VI. C ONCLUSION
encapsulated in his visionary proposal of parallel universes In conclusion, our exploration of quantum computing, quan-
as collaborative entities in quantum computation, forges new tum supremacy, and the intriguing concept of parallel universes
frontiers of thought, challenging established orthodoxies and reveals a dynamic and evolving landscape within the realm of
invoking a renaissance in the study of quantum mechanics. computational science. The attainment of quantum supremacy,
as demonstrated by Google’s milestone achievement with its
IV. F INDINGS 53-qubit Sycamore processor, signifies a transformative era
The discernments unearthed through the exhaustive inquiry where quantum computers excel in specialized computational
conducted herein serve as luminous beacons illuminating the tasks, challenging the boundaries of classical computation.
transformative promise of quantum computing, particularly in This achievement has ignited intense scholarly discourse and
the coveted realm of Quantum Supremacy. This milestone experimentation, paving the way for further advancements in
signifies a watershed moment wherein quantum computers quantum technology.
 The notion of parallel universes, rooted in Hugh Everett’s
Many-Worlds Interpretation, remains a captivating but minor-
ity view within the quantum paradigm. Researchers like David
Deutsch champion this interpretation, envisioning parallel uni-
verses as collaborators in quantum computation. While the
existence of parallel universes awaits experimental validation,
the concept continues to inspire philosophical and scientific
contemplation.
The exponential growth of quantum computational space
as qubit counts rise highlights the need for quantum error
correction and algorithm development to fully harness the
transformative potential of quantum computing. Moreover,
discussions around ethical considerations, the implications
for cryptography, security, and the broader societal impacts
of quantum technology persist as essential facets of this
burgeoning field.
In the dynamic interplay of theory, experimentation, and
philosophical exploration, the study of quantum computing
and its intersection with quantum supremacy and parallel uni-
verses promises to reshape our understanding of the quantum
realm and our place within it. As we stand at the forefront of
this quantum revolution, we anticipate further breakthroughs
that will continue to push the boundaries of computation and
redefine our perception of reality in the years to come.
R EFERENCES
[1] Chris Bernhardt, “Quantum Computing for Everyone,” Cambridge, MA
: The MIT Press, pp. 186, 2019.
[2] David Deutsch, The Fabric of Reality: The Science of Parallel Universes,
2011, pp.68–73.
[3] Richard P. Feynman, “The Feynman Lectures on Physics, Vol. III: The
New Millennium Edition: Quantum Mechanics vol. III, 2011
[4] Gil Kalai, Yosef Rinott and Tomer Shoham, “Google’s 2019 “Quantum
Supremacy” Claims:Data, Documentation, and Discussion,” 2022
[5] Hugh Everett, “The Many Worlds ,” 2008, Scientific American
297(6):72-9
[6] Gauthier, L., Dehaut, F., Joanette, Y., ”The Bells Test: A quantitative
and qualitative test for visual neglect,” 1989
[7] Bouwmeester, D., A. Ekert, A. Zeilinger (eds.) The Physics of Quantum
Information, Springer, Berlin (2001).
[8] Brown, J., The Quest for the Quantum Computer, Simon and Schuster,
New York (2000).
[9] Cohen-Tannoudji, C, B. Dui, F. Laloe¨, Quantum Mechanics, VolI,
Wiley, New York, (1977).
[10] McMahon, D., Quantum Mechanics Demystified, McGraw Hill, New
York (2005).
[11] Nielsen, M., and I. L. Chuang, Quantum Computation and Quantum
Information, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2000)
[12] Steeb, W. H. and Y. Hardy, Problems and solutions in Quantum
Computing and Quantum Information, World Scientific, New Jersey
(2004).
[13] Zettili, N, Quantum Mechanics: Concepts and Applications, Wiley New
York, (2001).

View publication stats