Chapter 3 4
Chapter 3 4
BASED ASSESSMENT
Introduction
Creating effective assessment tasks requires thinking through curriculum content to establish learning
outcomes, then designing performance activities that will allow students to demonstrate their achievement of
those outcomes, and specifying criteria by which they will be evaluated, experts say. To develop meaningful
performance assessment tasks that will reveal the learning that teachers hope to see, educators need to take
an assessment perspective from the beginning.
Learning Outcome
At the end of the lesson the
students will be able to develop a
portfolio of performance-based
assessment tools that measures Overview
learners’ competencies of a given Performance-based assessments share the key
subject. characteristic of accurately measuring one or
more specific course standards. They are also
complex, authentic, process/product-oriented,
open-ended and time-bound (Hilliard, 2015).
A well-designed performance assessment
helps the student to see connections between
the knowledge, skills, and abilities they have
learned from the classroom, including the
experiences which help them to construct their
Explore own meaning of knowledge.
https://www.pinterest.ph/pin/668503138408329510/
I. Product-Based and Performance-Based Assessments
Both product-based and performance-based assessments provide information about how student
understands and applies knowledge and involve hands-on tasks or activities that students must complete
individually or in small groups. Below are examples of product-based and performance-based assessments.
Types Examples
A. Product-Based Assessments
B. Performance-Based Assessments
II. What are the guidelines in developing a meaningful process and product performance
assessment that will match to the desired learning outcome?
The following are the basic steps in planning and implementing performance-based or product-
based assessments:
1. Define the purpose of performance or product-based assessment. The teacher may ask the
following questions?
➢ What concept, skill or knowledge of the students should be assessed?
➢ At what level should the students be performing?
➢ What type of knowledge is being assessed (e.g. remembering to create)?
In defining the purpose of assessment, learning targets must be carefully identified and taken into
consideration. Performance assessments primarily use four types of learning targets which are deep
understanding, reasoning, skills, and products (McMillan, 2007).
Deep Understanding
This focuses on the use of knowledge and skills. Students are involved in meaningful hands-on
activities for extended period of time to have rich and more extensive understanding.
Reasoning
This focuses on how students demonstrate skills and construct products. Students are given a
problem to solve or are asked to make decision, or other outcome.
Skills
This include student proficiency in reasoning, communication, and psychomotor tasks. Students are
required to demonstrate communication, presentation, and psychomotor skills.
Products
These are completed works in which students use their knowledge and skills (e.g. term papers,
projects, other assignments).
In defining the purpose of assessment, the teacher should identify whether the students will have to
demonstrate a process or a product. If the learning outcomes deal on the procedures, then it focuses on
process assessment. In assessing the process, it is essential also that assessment should be done while the
students are performing the procedures or steps. On the other hand, if the learning outcomes imply that the
major focus is the product that the student produces then it focuses on product assessment.
Examples of learning targets which require students to demonstrate process and produce products:
Learning Targets (demonstrate process) Learning Targets (produce products)
- procedures of proper handling of microscope - building a garden
- steps to be done when in an earthquake drill - conducting classroom-based researches
- mathematical operations - publishing newspaper
- reciting a poem - creating commercials
- constructing a table of specification - creating power point presentation
Example of process-oriented performance-based assessment (Enclosure No 4, DepEd Order No. 73, S.
2012)
Example 1: PHYSICAL EDUCATION GRADE 7
Specific Competencies:
1. Know the concept and principles of physical activity and its importance.
2. perform physical fitness activities that will improve one’s fitness level.
Example 2: Filipino Grade 7
Kakayahan:
Identify at least three (3) process-oriented learning competencies from the given tasks:
Example: The topic is on understanding musical elements and processes of Philippine Music,
particularly the music of Luzon.
Possible Task Design; Let the students describe the Philippine folk songs by analyzing the
musical elements and tabulating them accordingly. Five of these folk songs may be selected
for analysis.
Song Title Timbre Rhythm Meter Melody Harmony Texture Form
Pamulinawen (Ilocano)
Atin Cu Pung Sinsing
(Kapampangan
Salidummay (Western
Bondoc)
Doon Po Sa Amin (Tagalog)
Si Nanay Si Tatay Di Co
Babayaan (Bicolano)
Sitsiritsit (Tagalog
Manang Biday (Ilocano)
Aking Bituin (Tagalog)
Example: Paper folding is a traditional Japanese art. However, it can be used as an activity to
teach concept of plane and solid figures in geometry. Provide the students with a given number
of colored papers and ask them to construct as many plane and solid figures from these papers
without cutting them (by paper folding only).
(Navarro & De Guzman-Santos, 2013)
Regardless of whether these are process or product-oriented performance tasks, clearly stated
performance criteria are critical to the success of both instruction and assessment. Criteria in the real essence
of performance-based assessment define the target process and product, guide and help the students on
what should be taught and done, and provide a target in assessing the performance of the students.
3. Developing Scoring Schemes
There are different useful ways to record the assessment of students’ performance. Variety of tools
can be used for assessment depending on the nature of the performance it calls for. As teacher, you need to
critically examine the task to be performed matched with the assessment tools to be utilized.
a. Define the criteria. Criteria are guidelines or rules for judging students’ responses, products, or
performance. Before conducting the assessment, the performance criteria should be predetermined. The set
of criteria should be agreed upon by the teacher and the students. Performance criteria are important since
they define for the students the types of behavior or attributes of a product that are expected, as well as allow
the teacher and the students to evaluate a performance or product as objectively and as consistent as
possible. There are four types of criteria that can be used for evaluating student performance:
A. content criteria- to evaluate degree of a student’s knowledge and understanding of facts,
concepts, and principles related to the topic/subject;
B. process criteria- to evaluate the proficiency level of performance of a skill and process;
C. quality criteria- to evaluate the quality of a product or performance and
D. impact criteria- to evaluate the overall results or effects of a product or performance.
b. Create the performance rubric. Rubrics have been widely used as assessment tool in various
disciplines, most especially in the field of education. Rubrics can be defined as:
• Set of rules specifying the criteria used to find out what the students know and are able to do so.
(Musial, 2009).
• Scoring tools that lays out specific expectations for assignment. (Levy, 2005).
• A scoring guide that uses criteria to differentiate between levels of student proficiency. (McMillan,
2007).
• Descriptive scoring schemes that are developed by teachers or evaluators to guide the analysis of
products or processes of students’ effort. (Brookhart, 1999).
• The scoring procedures for judging students’ responses to performance tests. (Popham, 2011).
A rubric generally contains three essential features:
1.) criteria or the aspects of performance that will be assessed.
2.) performance descriptors or the characteristics associated with each dimension or criterion, and
3.) performance levels that identifies students’ level of mastery within each criterion.
The structure of the rubrics changes when measuring different learning targets. Rubrics can be classified
into two major types: analytic and holistic rubrics.
Analytic Rubric. Student’s work is evaluated by using each criterion separately, thus providing specific
feedback about the student’s performance or product along several dimensions.
Holistic Rubric. Student performance or output is evaluated by applying all criteria simultaneously, thus
providing a single score based on overall judgment about the quality of student’s work.
Analytic Rubric for Melody/Rhythm/Timbre/Dynamics
Category 5- points 4-points 3-points 2-points 1-point
Melody Able to sing Able to sing Able to sing Able to sing Could not
the songs in the songs in the songs in a few parts follow the
the correct the correct the correct of the songs melodic lines
pitch without pitch with pitch with in the correct
any mistake only few several pitch but with
mistakes mistakes a lot of
wrong notes.
Rhythm Able to Able to Able to Had a lot of Rhythmic
interpret all interpret all interpret all difficulty in patterns
the notes the notes the notes following the were not
and rests and rests and rests but rhythmic followed
correctly or correctly or with difficulty patterns
without with 1-3
mistakes mistakes
Timbre Can sing the Sound Sound Sound Weak tone
whole piece quality is quality is quality is airy production
in the inconsistent inconsistent and breathy
prescribed in some parts in some parts
sound quality of the song. of the song
but is clear
and
beginning to
be focused in
some parts.
Dynamics Dynamics Improper use Improper use Improper use Dynamics
was properly of dynamics of dynamics of dynamics was not used
used in all in 1-2 parts in 3-4 parts
parts of the of the songs. of the songs. in most parts properly at
song Dynamics Dynamics of the song. all.
was properly was properly
used in the used in the
rest of the rest of the
song. song.
Taken from Enclosure No. 4, DepEd Order No. 73, S.2012
Step 1: Determine the learning outcome and the performance task to be evaluated.
To guide the teacher in identifying the performance task/s that he/she wants to be evaluated, ask the
following questions:
• What learning outcome/s to be evaluated?
• Which student performance/s or output/s in the subject are relevant measures of such students
learning outcomes?
• Are all of these tasks equally important?
• Which is the best representation of the expected learning outcomes?
Step 2: Identify the quality attributes or indicators of performance task.
This can be based from the teacher’s own expectations and benchmark exemplars of work that reflect
key standards. You may explore and specify the skills, knowledge, and or behavior that you will be looking
for to describe the standard in one’s performance. Be sure to limit the characteristics that are important.
Step 3: Determine the criteria or dimension.
Keep in mind that only relevant criteria should be included in the rubric. You also need to determine
the what type of criteria and rubric will be used. For example, in a dance performance task, all attributes that
pertain to how well the students execute the dance in terms of movement, body position, placement in stage,
and dance style can be grouped under the criterion “Technical Skills”. Likewise, for a research report rubric,
you can include as criteria the different parts of research such as introduction, method, data gathering and
analysis, conclusion and recommendations.
Step 4: Determine the benchmarks and point values.
A number of descriptors can be used to denote the levels of performance. Examples of levels of
performance include:
Level 4 Exemplary Distinguished Substantially Developed Outstanding
Level 3 Accomplished Proficient Mostly Developed Proficient
Level 2 Developing Apprentice Developed Acceptable
Level 1 Beginning Novice Undeveloped Unacceptable
Step 5: Write the benchmark or performance descriptors for quality work criteria.
These performance descriptors should describe the relative differences between performances at
each level. The differences between performance points can be presented by:
(1) aspects of performance or behavior at different levels
e.g. evaluates the different characteristics of ………. (4 points)
analyzes the different characteristics of ………. (3 points)
describes the different characteristics of ………. (2 points)
lists the different characteristics of ……………... (1 point)
(2) adjective, adjectival phrases, adverbs and adverbial phrases to present different qualitative
differences between levels
e.g. explains to a very great extent the . . ..
explains to a great extent the . . ..
explains with moderate accuracy the . . ..
explains with limited accuracy the . . ..
(3) numeric references to identify quantitative differences between levels
e.g. gives more than 4 relevant examples of . . . . . .. .
gives 3-4 relevant examples of the . . . . . .. .
gives 1-2 relevant examples of the . . . . . .. .
gives no (0) relevant examples of the . . . . . .. .
(4) degrees of assistance needed by the student to complete the task
e.g. explains the topic correctly and independently on his own
explains the topic with very little assistance from the teacher or classmates
explains the topic with occasional assistance from the teacher or classmates
needs assistance from the teacher or classmates in explaining the topic most of the time
To make the rubric more relevant and useful to the students, it is important for teacher to:
1. prepare rubric and make it available to students before they begin with the assigned task to inform them
the requirements, criteria, and expectations so as to guide them in carrying out their tasks;
2. develop rubric with performance descriptors that are clear and easily understood by students;
3. present the rubric to students and allow them to give their feedback and suggestions to improve or refine
it;
4. if possible, involve students in the creation of rubric to enhance their motivation, engagement, and self-
regulation; and
5. orient the students on how to effectively use the rubric, especially those that are used for self-assessment
and peer-assessment.
4. Rating the Performance
The main objective of rating the performance is to be objective and consistent. It is important to adhere
to the criteria set and used the rubric developed. It is also important to provide specific and meaningful
feedback and explanations to students on how they have performed the tasks, clarifying to them what they
understand, what they don’t understand, and where they can improve.
Apply
2. In your field of specialization, identify several learning outcomes which can be best measured with
performance-based assessment tasks. For each learning competence formulate three tasks.
FIELD OF SPECIALIZATION
Competencies
Task Design
Scoring
Scheme
STEP 3: Scoring Scheme
Create a scoring rubric from the task formulated. Show how each element of writing
and implementing scoring are presented. Follow strictly the steps presented in designing
rubric.
Title: ______________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________
Specific Competencies:
Dimension
Introduction
Students’ performance is not measured by academic performance alone. Behaviors, attitude and
motivation are affective components of the learners that influences his or her learning.
Information about learner’s experiences with a subject or an activity is only part of what is needed as
input in order to explain their performance. In a class, it would be an obvious evidence that experience
appears to be consistent from student to student, still some perform better than the others. And this difference
among students needs to be part of the information to assess students better.
The learner’s attitudes toward academic tasks influence their achievements (Harter: 19998 as cited
by Cajigal & Mantuano, 2014). Attitude is associated with what is called the individual’s affective domain, and
it affects significance dimension to assessment. If there is a relationship between how students feel about a
task and their performance, it is but necessary for teachers to assess affect and then do something to
influence affect. Attitude measures are part of the broader category of personality measures. This area of
assessment is significant since information about personality characteristics gives more information that will
help in predicting how a particular set of learners will likely to respond to certain learning situation.
Affective refers to a wide variety of traits and dispositions that are different from knowledge, reasoning
and manipulative skills (Hohn, 1995). Since the word “affect” is general, it is appropriate that a teacher will
identify specific trait/s or affective skills in developing learning targets. The affective component involves a
child’s feelings / emotions and attitude about a lesson, an activity or a project. A teacher should consider the
learners’ affective skills that must be develop in order to be effective in their personal and professional lives.
The affective learning targets vary from simple attention to selected complex but internally consistent
qualities of character and conscience. The levels of affective domain emphasize a feeling, tone, emotion,
or degree of acceptance or rejection. It has five levels of affective targets which the teacher may use to
target learner behavior that can be assessed at the end of the lesson.
Level 1. Receiving (Attention). Attention can be assessed through interest inventories and can be
rated using the Likert Scale. Attention refers to the student’s willingness to attend to a classroom activity
under the direction of a teacher.
Level 2. Responding (Interest). Interest can be shown by the active participation of the learners in
class discussion, volunteering for tasks, enjoys helping others and willingness to answer questions.
Level 5. Characterization by Value (Lifestyle). When a student can work independently, cooperate
in group activities demonstrates punctuality and self-discipline and consistency of his daily actions is
demonstrating a value-laden lifestyle.
Apply
1. Apply the concepts discussed on affective learning targets. Using the levels of learning
targets of the affective domain, write at least two measurable affective
targets/objectives. Follow the format given below. Write your answer in a separate
sheet of paper (For modular learning)
Receiving 1.
(Attending)
2.
Responding 1.
2.
Valuing 1.
2.
Organizing 1.
2.
Characterizing by a 1.
value or value
concept
2.
Asess
Write your own ideas about the importance of affective targets. Below are your guide questions.
Follow the same manner of submission.