A

CAPSTONE PROJECT REPORT

ON

“ESTIMATION AND DESIGN OF AIRPORT”

Submitted by

Exam Seat No: Name of Candidate:

(108555) Swayam Bamane
(108545) Dev Jethva
(108562) Shravani Jadhav
(108547) Siddhesh Patil
Under the Guidance of

Mr. Sagar Mungase

Towards Partial fulfilment for the award of

Diploma of
Civil Engineering, Third Year, Semester V
Maharashtra State Board of Technical Education
2023-24

DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING

BharatiVidyapeeth Institute of Technology, Navi Mumbai-410210

i
 Maharashtra State
Board of Technical Education
Certificate
This is to certify that Mr. / Ms. ………………………………………
Roll No. ……………………………… of Fifth Semester Diploma in
…………………………………………………………… of Institute
…………………………………………………………………………
(Code ………………) has completed Industrial Training for the
Academic Year 2021-22 as prescribed in the curriculum.

Place: …………… Enrollment No ……………………

Date …………….. Exam Seat No …………………….

Project Guide Head of the Department Principal

ii
 Examination Approval Sheet
Capstone Project Report entitled

On

“ ESTIMATION AND DESIGN OF AIRPORT”

Submitted by

Exam Seat No Name of Candidate

(123456) (XYZ)

Is approved for Third Year, Semester-V of

Civil Engineering

Of

Maharashtra State Board of Technical Education

In the Academic Year 2023-24

From

Department of Civil Engineering

Bharati Vidyapeeth Institute of Technology, Navi Mumbai-410210

Project Guide (Name & Sign): Mr. Sagar Mungase

iii
Date : ______________ Place : Kharghar

iv
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

It gives me immense pleasure to present my Synopsis Report on “ESTIMATION AND

DESIGN OF AIRPORT” and to express my deep regards towards those who have offered
their valuable time and guidance in my hour of need.

I would like to express my sincere and whole-hearted thanks to my project guide Mr.Sagar
Mungase and Head of Department Mrs. Cissy Shaji for contributing their valuable time,
knowledge, experience and guidance in making this project successfully done.

I am also glad to express my gratitude and thanks to my college Bharati Vidyapeeth

Institute of Technology, Navi Mumbai and Respected Principal Mr. P.N. Tandon for
continuous inspiration and encouragement.

This report helped me to learn new techniques, developments taking place in Civil
Engineering and to revise some previous concepts. Indeed I perceive this opportunity as a
milestone in my career development.

Last but not the least, I sincerely thank to my colleagues, the staff and all others who directly
or indirectly helped me and made numerous suggestions which have surely improved the
quality of my work.

Sincerely,

Name:

Enrollment Id:

Seat Number:

v
 INTRODUCTION

1.1 Overview of Project

The main objective of our project is to know the Estimating and Costing and innovative
design of multi airport system. The estimate is defined as the process of calculating or
computing the various quantities and the expected expenditure to be incurred on a particular
work or project. The estimate gives the probable cost of the work. The primary objective of
an estimate is to enable one to know the probable cost of the work before the completion of
the project. Multi airport systems is a key mechanism by which air transportation systems

will be able to meet future demand worldwide.

1.2 Following points should be considered

1) Estimation of multi airport system instead of single airport system.

2) By knowing, acknowledging and finding the problems associated with single airport
system and as a solution planning, modeling of multi airport system is decided.
3) Planning, modeling and estimation is completed with various software’s such as
AutoCAD2D, Sketch UP pro 3D, Excel and WinEST.
4) The Estimation and planning aspect of multi airport system is done according to Airport
Reference Code (ARC)
5) The markings for runway’s and parking lots has been provided accordingly.
6) Terminal building is a G+3 structure for the accumulation, entry and exit, security
concerns of passengers.
7) Traffic air control tower is constructed for the direction and controlling air traffic.
8) Materials mentioned are of superior quality for the better aesthetic, strength, durability of
the structure.

vi
 CONTENTS

2.1 Methodology
The first phase involved the identification of multi-airport systems using a worldwide
airport passenger traffic database composed of data from ICAO (ICAO 2008) and FAA
(FAA2007). All airports with more than 500,000 passengers in 2005 were considered in
this analysis. A geographical cluster analysis was performed to identify airports located in
the vicinity of each other. These airports were then categorized into two types; primary
airports and secondary airports. After the identification of multi airport system, we now
proceeded for the making of 3d models with help of sketch up pro, showing the future or
how a “multi airport” system would look, as this is the first phase of our project i.e.
modelling of airport

Fig No. 3.1 Methodology Plan Chart

vii
2.2 Planning of multi airport system

2.2.1 Planning

2.2.2 Drawing- Auto CAD, Sketch up Pro

i. Ground floor plan

ii. First floor plan
iii. Front elevation plan
iv. Section at X-X
v. Foundation Plan
vi. Site plan
vii. Schedule of doors and windows

2.2.3 Estimating in Excel sheet

i. General
ii. Approximate quantity method cost estimate
iii. Advantages of approximate quantities estimating method
iv. Calculation in excel sheet
v. List of items considered while estimating in excel sheet

viii
 Literature Review

1. Richard De Neufville:
Richard De Neufville showed significant differences in the evolution of multi-airport systems
across world regions. In the United States and in Europe, the recent development of multi-
airport systems primarily involved the emergence of secondary airports. This dynamic was
driven by the entry of low-cost carriers seizing the opportunity of using existing airport
infrastructure but also by the barriers and opposition to the construction of green field
airports.

2. Bonnefoy Philippe:
With the growing demand for air transportation and the limited ability to increase capacity at
some key points in the air transportation system, Bonnefoy Philippe showed that there are
concerns that in the future the system will not scale to meet demand. This situation will result
in the generation and the propagation of delays throughout the system, impacting passengers’
quality of travel and more broadly the economy.

3. John Hansman:
It was found that the U.S. air transportation network was not scale-free due to capacity
constraints at major airports, also preventing it from being scalable. However, the
construction and analysis of a new network for which sets of two or more significant airports
that serve passenger traffic in a metropolitan region (i.e. multi-airport systems) were
aggregated into single nodes showed that it was scale-free and scalable.

4. Alexander Medvedev:
This article discusses the issue of innovation in airport design which is supported by aviation
project management. This is why the decision making process on innovation in an airport’s
design should correlate with future perspectives in aviation. This process influences a
decrease in time and money lost during the period of leading an aviation project. A good
result is obtained through selected essential information and analysis of the airport
management process in order to achieve efficiency in aircraft operation.

5. Iyad Alomar:

ix
In the Transportation Research Board (2008) we saw that one of the major goals of this
research project was not only to identify innovations, but also to under-stand and evaluate
their potential effects on airport terminal landside facility planning and design. As a result,
several new landside and terminal concepts that incorporate one or more innovations have
been developed

6. Fariba Alamdari:
Fariba Alamdari has continued liberalization of the airline market in the European
Community offers the prospect of competition in terms of price, frequency of service and
many other attributes. Understanding these factors that influence passenger demand and
incorporating them into a demand function poses a substantial theoretical and empirical
challenge. A basis for estimating demand functions is the logit model.

7. Ashford N:
worked on the data from Civil Aviation Authority surveys to develop a methodology to
model air trip generation within the Midlands region and air trip distribution between
available airports. The technique applied in the modelling of air trip generation is that of
propensity to fly, whereby the trip-making population are categorized both spatially.

8. Carr D:
Carr, D had his paper which investigates the impact of airport managerial type and airline
market structure on airport efficiency. It explores whether the market shares of the largest
airlines differ depending on the managerial type of the airport. In this study, the efficiency
scores for the sample airport are measured through DEA (Data Envelop Analysis), and the
impacts of the airport managerial type and dominant carrier market share on airport
efficiency are subsequently estimated through CEM (Coarsened Exact Matching).

9. Clark J:
Clark J had his paper as introduction to the special issue on strategic planning has four main
parts. First comes a discussion of what makes public-sector strategic planning strategic. This
discussion is meant to reduce confusion about what strategic planning is and is not. Next, he
introduce in detail the five articles in the special issue and note their unique contributions to
strategic planning research. Third, we provide a broad assessment of the current state of
strategic planning research organized.

x
10. Cohas F:
Cohas F has consider qualitative characteristics of multi-airport systems, showing the
importance of market forces. Then, we build an airport market share model that captures the
dynamics of the market, where airlines and air passengers select an airport on the basis of a
broad range of factors. Case studies are carried out for several origin-destination markets out
of three large metropolitan areas: New York, Washington-Baltimore, and the San Francisco
Bay Area.
11. Barber:
Barber's paper on Airline deregulation is spreading worldwide and has important
consequences for the planning, design, and management of airports. One important effect is
that the overall traffic at an airport—and by extension its revenues—is much more volatile in
a liberal environment. This is demonstrated by analysis of the US experience over the last 25
years. The increased risk thus associated with airport projects emphasizes the need to discard
traditional, static master planning in favor of dynamic strategic planning.

12. William Fruhan:

William Fruhan has progressed for past two decades the concept of organizational strategy
has emerged as one of the cornerstones of both management theory and practice. During the
period, numerous papers, articles, and books have explored this concept and its myriad
characteristics and nuances. Nevertheless, some aspects of the subject have received far more
attention than others. For example, much greater emphasis has been placed on the
organizational processes by which strategies are developed than on the content of the
strategies themselves.

13. Harvey G:
Harvey G did the analysis which demonstrates that ground access time and the frequency of
direct air service to the chosen destination can account for a large portion of the variation in
airport usage patterns, but that both access time and frequency have nonlinear effects on
airport utility. It also suggests that even multi-stop direct service is strongly preferred to
connecting flights. The results highlight the importance of attention to ground access in
planning for multiple airport systems.

14. Galerman W:
Galerman W.had his paper present a method for evaluating and choosing between various
network configurations for an air transportation network. Based upon a model for
determining the optimal assignment of capacity to a given network, it is possible to define

xi
what kind of networks best serve a particular pattern of traffic, and how that optimal network
might change when aircraft of different size are used, or when traffic patterns grow. These
analyses also suggest how load factors should most economically be balanced between long
and short haul, and between high and low density routes.

15. Kanafani A:

Kanafani A has the phenomenon of airline hubbing has been on the increase in recent years.
Hubbing arises when airlines attempt to maintain high levels of aircraft utilization and to take
advantage of scale economies. Passengers also appear to benefit from hubbing in the form of
increased frequency of service. The nature of traffic generated at the hub airports implies
some negative economic impacts which suggest that hub pricing should be considered
seriously.

xii