Republic of the Philippines

Department of Education

National Educators Academy of the Philippines

SCHOOL-BASED PD PROGRAM DESIGN QUALITY ASSURANCE TOOL

Professional Development (PD)

Program Title

Proposed PD Program

Division

Application Receipt

General instructions:
The evaluator shall be guided with the following instructions for determining the compliance of the proposed PD program elements to the quality standards:
a. Put a check mark in the box under the column Not Evident if all the requirements of the quality standards are not exhibited in the PD program element
(relevant section).
b. Put a check mark in the box under column Partially Evident if one or more requirements of the quality standards is/are not exhibited in the PD
program element (relevant section).
c. Put a check mark in the box under column Fully Evident if all the requirements of the quality standards are exhibited in the PD program element
(relevant section).
d. For Partially Evident and Not Evident evaluations, input in the Remarks column your clearly articulated findings/comments/suggestions.
 Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education

National Educators Academy of the Philippines

Fully Partially Not

PD Program Component and Quality Standards Remarks
Evident Evident Evident

A. Strength of Research Base

Align the reskilling initiative with the results of the

1. The proposed PD program is based on the results competency-based professional development needs
of competency-based professional development assessment.
needs assessments (i.e., through individual ☐ /☐ ☐
development plans (IDPs), DepEd priorities across
levels, learners’ learning outcomes, etc.)
Specify the tool and method used as basis for needs
assessment.

2. The proposed PD program’s content and

methodologies are justified and supported by Justify the PD program's content and methodologies
☐ /☐ ☐
research literature or theories and/or legal bases based on literature and legal bases
(DepEd issuances/RA) if any.

B.

1. The proposed PD program responds to at least ☐ ☐ /☐ Specify the targeted competency appropriately
 Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education

National Educators Academy of the Philippines

one PPST/PPSSH/PPSS domain, strand, and

indicator, and/or other emerging needs of the
Department.

2. The target PPST/PPSSH/PPSS domain, strand,

☐ ☐ /☐
and indicator in each session is indicated.

C. Target Participants Profile

1. The proposed PD program identifies the career

stage/s and profile (teacher/school
/☐ ☐ ☐
head/supervisor, position, subject, and/or
grade/year level taught) of the target participants.

2. The target number of participants is specified. /☐ ☐ ☐

D. Articulation of Learning Objectives

1. The proposed PD program’s workplace Enhance the articulation of learning objectives by ensuring all objectives
development objectives and session objectives are ☐ /☐ ☐ follow the SMART principle and support the development of target
professional standards.
articulated according to the SMART principles.

2. The proposed PD program’s workplace

development objectives and session objectives are
logically articulated to support the development of /☐ ☐ ☐
the target professional standard (domain, strand,
and indicator).

E. Session Contents

1. Contents are appropriate and adequate to support ☐ /☐ ☐ Provide the duration of the PD based on the content of the session.
 Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education

National Educators Academy of the Philippines

the attainment of the learning objectives and

expected outputs.

2. Contents are accurate and based on credible

☐ /☐ ☐
sources of information.

3. For subject content-based PD programs, contents

☐ /☐ ☐
align with the curriculum standards.

4. Contents are organized according to the most

☐ /☐ ☐
appropriate sequence and structure.

F.

1. The methodologies (e.g., active learning,

experiential learning or collaborative learning,
Specify the methodologies to be employed in attaining the session
etc.) employ adult learning principles with ☐ /☐ ☐ objective.
opportunities to be active, experiential, social,
self-directed and goal oriented.

2. The methodologies describe in detail or step-by-

Ensure that methodologies clearly describe the process for delivering
step process how the assigned resource speaker ☐/ ☐ ☐ content and engaging participants, following adult learning principles.
will deliver content and engage participants.

3. The methodologies indicate the relevant learning

resources that the resource speaker and
☐ ☐ ☐
participants will use to support the attainment of
the session objectives.

4. The methodologies use recognized best learning ☐ ☐ /☐

 Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education

National Educators Academy of the Philippines

practices such as motivational/mood-setting

activities, modeling, etc.

G. Assessment Strategies and Tools

1. The formative and summative assessment

strategies are varied and sufficient to assess
☐ ☐ /☐
learner’s progress and proficiency in the target
competencies for development.

2. Appropriate assessment tools are identified and

provided. Rubrics are available for ☐ ☐ /☐
performance/demonstration-based assessment.

H.

1. The session outputs are concrete, e.g., reflection

journal, TA Plan, lesson exemplar, rubrics, ☐ ☐ /☐
worksheets.

2. The session outputs are relevant to the session

objectives and can be realistically produced by ☐ ☐ /☐
participants within set time.

I. Workplace Application

1. The proposed PD program provides opportunities ☐ ☐ ☐/

for development and application of acquired
competencies: crafting and implementation of
 Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education

National Educators Academy of the Philippines

Learning Action Plan (LAP).

2. The LAP can be realistically completed within an

adequate period (exclusive of school breaks for
☐ ☐ ☐/
teachers) using available resources in the
workplace.

J.

1. The indicative dates of implementation of the

proposed PD program do not interfere with the
conduct of school-based instructionally relevant ☐ ☐ /☐
activities, especially the actual classroom teaching
of teachers.

2. Sessions are appropriately sequenced and

☐ ☐ /☐
adequately timed.

K.

1. The Resource Speakers/Subject-Matter Experts'

CVs reflect expertise relevant to the
PPST/PPSSH/PPSS domain/s, strand/s and ☐ ☐ /☐
indicator/s covered in the Speaker's/Subject-
Matter Expert’s session/s.

L. Gender Equality, Disability and Social Inclusion

1. Proposed PD program elements (i.e., participants ☐ ☐/ ☐

selection criteria, activities, learning resource Promote inclusivity by integrating Gender Equality,
 Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education

National Educators Academy of the Philippines

Disability, and Social Inclusion (GEDSI) principles in

materials, resource speakers, and monitoring and participant selection, learning materials, and evaluation.
evaluation, etc.) promote maximum engagement
of participants from all backgrounds (disability, 
age, gender, religious and ethnic backgrounds).

M. Monitoring and Evaluation

1. The proposed PD Program M&E plan reflects the Develop a monitoring and evaluation (M&E) plan that
four levels of evaluation according to Kirkpatrick’s reflects Kirkpatrick’s four levels, ensuring tools for each
☐/ ☐ ☐
Model (Level 1: Reaction; Level 2: Learning; Level level are provided and aligned with the PD program’s
3: Behavior; and Level 4: Result). objectives.

2. For Level 1, daily evaluation tool to measure how

participants find the PD program favorable,
☐ ☐ ☐/
engaging, and relevant to their jobs is indicated
and submitted.

3. For Level 2, formative and summative assessment

tools to measure participants’ acquired
knowledge, skills, attitude, confidence, and ☐ ☐ ☐/
commitment based on their participation in the
PD program are indicated and submitted.

4. For Level 3, the LAP template detailing how ☐ ☐ ☐

participants will apply what they learned from the
 Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education

National Educators Academy of the Philippines

PD program when they are back on the job is

indicated and submitted.

N. Budget and Costing

1. Proposed budget per participant is within the

allowable limits according to government
☐ ☐ ☐/
budgeting, accounting, and auditing rules and
regulations.

2. The attached itemized expenditure reflects the

cost of the proposed PD program vis-à-vis the ☐ ☐ ☐/
allowable expenses.

RECOMMENDATION

Process and issue Quality Assurance

Yes
Certification

Are all Quality Return to PD Program Provider

Standards fully
evident? No
For compliance with the recommendations

For provision of technical assistance

Quality Assured by:

 Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education

National Educators Academy of the Philippines

Evaluator/s

Signature/s

Date

This Form is not valid if not signed.

 Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education

National Educators Academy of the Philippines

SCHOOL-BASED PD PROGRAM DESIGN QUALITY ASSURANCE RECOMMENDATION FORM

Professional Development
RISE 2024: Reinforcing Instructional Skills for Educators
(PD) Program Title

/ In-service Training (INSET)

Proposed PD Program
☐ Learning Action Cell (LAC)

School Name TALOTOG ELEMENTARY SCHOOL II

Date Received October 23, 2024

Submission ☐/ Initial Submission

☐ First Resubmission
 Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education

National Educators Academy of the Philippines

☐ Second Resubmission

Date Evaluated October 24, 2024

Process and issue Quality Assurance

☐ YES
Certification
Decision Are all quality
standards Return to PD Program Provider
FULLY
☐/ NO ☐ /For compliance with the recommendations
EVIDENT?
☐ For the provision of technical assistance

PD PROGRAM ELEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS FOR COMPLIANCE

Rationale 1.

Alignment to the Professional

Standards

Target Participants Profile 1.

Articulation of Learning 1.
Objectives

Methodology

Assessment Strategies & Tools

 Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education

National Educators Academy of the Philippines

Expected Outputs

Workplace Application 1.

Time Requirement 1.

Credentials/Expertise of 1.
Resource Speaker/Subject-
Matter Expert

Gender Equality, Disability, and 1.

Social Inclusion

Monitoring and Evaluation Plan 1.

Budget Estimate Plan

Other Remarks

EVALUATED BY: