The School For Scandal
The School For Scandal
The School For Scandal
Author
Richard Brinsley Sheridan
Year of Publication & First Performed
1777
Type
Play
Genre
Comedy
About the Title
The title relates to the popularity of malicious scandal and gossip in 18th-century London's
upper-class salons. These salons were highly cultured and insular environments in which wit and
complex mannerisms were learned as if taught in a school. Middle-class audiences of Sheridan's
time delighted in comic plays, called comedies of manners, exposing the foibles of a privileged,
self-indulgent class. As portrayed in plays such as The School for Scandal, the upper classes had
nothing better to do with their time than to tear down reputations, engage in trivial and superficial
pursuits, and score points with each other for witty banter at the expense of the truth.
CONTEXT
Literature in the Age of Reason
The Age of Reason, also called the Enlightenment, was an epoch of measured discourse,
scientific advancement, and social and literary refinement that spanned the 17th and 18th centuries.
The movement witnessed the primacy of rational as opposed to emotional values. The flagship
authors of the era were poet John Dryden (1631–1700), author Jonathan Swift (1667–1745), poet
Alexander Pope (1688–1744), novelist Henry Fielding (1707–54) and literary critic Samuel
Johnson (1709–84).
Several new literary forms developed during this time. One of the most popular was the mock-epic
poem exemplified by Pope's The Rape of the Lock (1712). A mock-epic applies the characteristics
of a classical epic to a trivial subject. For example, in Pope's poem, the theft of a lock of hair is
treated as if it were so important it could cause a war. Another popular literary form was the verse
epistle, a long poem in the form of a letter addressed to a particular person or group. In addition,
many poets wrote verse satires, long poems meant to ridicule some kind of action, event, or person.
The comedy of manners in drama, the genre to which The School for Scandal belongs, also
flourished at this time. The genre got its start in the opening decades of the Restoration (1660–85),
when the exiled King Charles II was placed back on the throne in England. A comedy of manners
is a play that makes fun of the behavior of a particular class, usually the upper class. Sheridan was
a master of the comedy of manners.
Alongside these relatively traditional literary genres, a new type of prose narrative developed
whose very name proclaimed its innovative features: the novel. The rise of the English novel,
beginning around 1720, was guided by three brilliant authors: Daniel Defoe (1660–1731), Samuel
Richardson (1689–1761), and Fielding.
Literary historians often claim that the comedy of manners was invented by Sir George Etherege
(1635–92). However, it would be more accurate to say that the genre gradually developed over the
four decades from 1660 to 1700. It involved playwrights such as William Wycherley (1641–1716),
Etherege, George Farquhar (1678–1707), John Gay (1685–1732), Aphra Behn (1640–89), and
William Congreve (1670–1729). These English playwrights operated in tandem with the towering
French genius Molière (1622–73), whose comedies of manners ruled the French stage in the mid-
17th century. Nearly a century later, in 1777, Sheridan's comedy of manners was a great hit. The
School for Scandal is often considered the greatest comedy of manners in English.
Speaking Names
Speaking names, also called type names, are names that in some way describe or relate to
the nature of a character. They are a prominent feature of the comedy of manners. Restoration and
18th-century dramatists did not invent this device. The convention is as old as the ancient Greek
comedies of Aristophanes and Menander in the 5th and 4th centuries BCE. Ancient Greek comedy,
in turn, set a pattern for the Latin comedies of Plautus (c. 254–184 BCE). Among his plays, there
are many characters with speaking names. For example, he gave the name Curculio, a Latin word
for weevil (a kind of insect), to a parasite-like character in the play of the same name.
Imitation of this device by the playwrights of the Restoration Age reflected the admiration
they cherished for the classical heritage. Most speaking names accurately signal their characters'
stereotyped nature. For example, Lady Sneerwell (sneer + well) and Snake in The School for
Scandal follow this pattern. However, some names are more intriguingly ambiguous. For example,
the three characters in Sheridan's play named "Surface," for their last names, characterize different
connotations of the word surface. All three are not what they seem to be at first sight. For
example, Joseph Surface, who appears to be upright and respectable, is actually a hypocrite and
something of a lecher. Charles Surface, who appears to be a wastrel, actually has a good heart.
And Sir Oliver Surface, the young men's uncle, assumes two disguises in the course of the play.
In an effort to identify his nephews' true nature, he becomes "Mr. Premium" and "Mr. Stanley."
This is only one of several characteristics borrowed from the Greco-Roman theatrical
traditions. Others include true love facing parental opposition, mistaken identities, servants more
clever than their masters, stereotypical villains and heroes, a moral ending of punishment and
reward, and plenty of visual as well as verbal jokes. England had a long history of such borrowing;
Shakespeare's Comedy of Errors is, for example, the reworking of the play Menaechmi by Plautus.
Even before Shakespeare, traveling troupes offered these stock situations and verbal styles, and
medieval morality and miracle plays also included them. What changed in this time period was
that the genre expresses the increasing strength of the upper middle classes pushing against the old
powers of the Church and aristocracy.
Women's parts had been played by boys in Elizabethan and Jacobean theater, from 1561 to 1642.
Now, for the first time in the history of the English theater, female actors played female roles.
Actresses such as Nell Gwyn (1650–87) and Sarah Siddons (1755–1831) added immensely to the
theater's popularity, and some of them—notably Gwyn—caught the special interest of the king.
Charles II made Gwyn one of his many mistresses.
Playhouses were also greatly expanded. Around 1775 David Garrick, the actor and producer who
managed Drury Lane, enlarged the theater so it could accommodate 2,300 spectators. In the early
1800s after a disastrous fire, the theatre was rebuilt and the capacity grew to over 3,000. New
forms of entertainment, such as ballet, pantomime, and circus acts, also took hold.
PLOT SUMMARY
The School for Scandal begins in the dressing room of Lady Sneerwell, a wealthy widow
with a penchant for plotting and spreading rumors. Lady Sneerwell has hired Snake to forge letters
for her and place false stories in the gossip columns. They discuss her plot to stop Charles Surface,
whom she loves, from becoming engaged to the heiress Maria. Lady Sneerwell is conspiring with
Charles’s older brother Joseph, who has a reputation for goodness, but is really a selfish hypocrite
and liar, and who wants to marry Maria for her money. Snake departs and a group of
gossipmongers, including Joseph, Mrs. Candour, Sir Benjamin Backbite, and Mr.
Crabtree congregate at Lady Sneerwell’s house. Maria is also there, but she rushes from the room
in distress when the others gossip about Charles’s enormous debts and financial misfortunes.
The next scene introduces Sir Peter Teazle and his confidante Mr. Rowley. Sir Peter has
lived all his life as a bachelor, but seven months ago married a much younger woman. He and Lady
Teazle fight all the time and Sir Peter is sure his wife is always to blame. He complains of the bad
influence that Lady Sneerwell has on his wife. He is also upset because Maria, who is his ward,
does not want to marry Joseph. Sir Peter, who served for some time as a guardian to the Surface
brothers, is convinced that Joseph is an exemplary young man with strong morals, and he believes
that Charles is not only badly behaved, but also bad deep down. Rowley disagrees: he thinks
Charles is wild, but will grow up into a good man. Rowley delivers the news that Sir Peter’s old
friend Sir Oliver Surface has arrived back in England after sixteen years in the East Indies.
The second act begins with a quarrel between the Teazles in their home. Lady Teazle wants
large sums of money to buy luxury goods. Sir Peter reminds her that she grew up simply and lived
with none of the things she now says she needs. Lady Teazle says she remembers that boring life
well. After his wife leaves, Sir Peter marvels at how attractive she is when she argues with him.
At Lady Sneerwell’s the gossipmongers (now including the Teazles) are laughing at their
acquaintances’ appearances and misfortunes. Maria and Sir Peter find this gossip appalling, while
Lady Teazle joins in with the others in making jokes at others’ expenses. Away from the others,
Joseph tries to convince Maria to consider him as a potential husband, but she refuses. Although
she says she knows from all she has heard that Charles is not fit to marry her, she will not consider
marrying his brother. Lady Teazle, who has been considering taking Joseph as a lover, enters the
room to find Joseph on his knees in front of Maria. He makes an excuse and, after Lady Teazle
sends Maria from the room, begins to try to seduce Lady Teazle, but she is not sure whether to
trust his explanation of what she saw.
Rowley brings Sir Oliver to see Sir Peter’s house. They rejoice at being reunited, and Sir
Peter gives Sir Oliver his impressions of the Joseph and Charles (who are his nephews and potential
heirs). Sir Oliver thinks that the description of Joseph that Sir Peter gives is too good to be true.
Sir Oliver hatches a plot to test his nephews’ characters and choose an heir. When Sir
Oliver left the country Charles and Joseph were too young to now remember what he looks like,
and Sir Oliver plans to use this fact to test them. He plans to go to Charles disguised as a
moneylender named “Mr. Premium,” to see how extravagant Charles really is. To test Joseph’s
alleged morality, he plans to visit his older nephew in the guise of a poor relative who needs charity
named “Mr. Stanley.”
Rowley introduces Sir Oliver to Moses, a Jewish moneylender who will accompany him
to see Charles, and the two men leave to call on Charles. Left alone, Sir Peter immediately gets
into an argument with Maria, who says she will not obey his command to marry Joseph. Maria
runs from the room and Lady Teazle enters. Sir Peter proposes that they should stop their
quarrelling and his wife agrees, but when he tells her that she was always the one to start their
fights in the past, they begin to fight again. Sir Peter accuses Lady Teazle of having an affair with
Charles Surface, a rumor that Snake and Lady Sneerwell have been spreading. She indignantly
denies this and leaves. Sir Peter is infuriated, especially because Lady Teazle never loses her
temper when they fight.
Sir Oliver, pretending to be Mr. Premium, arrives with Moses at Charles’s house, where
Charles is drinking and playing cards with friends. Charles appeals to Mr. Premium for money,
explaining that although he has sold off all his property, he expects to be the heir of the fabulously
wealthy Sir Oliver. Charles suggests that Mr. Premium can collect the debt when Sir Oliver dies.
Mr. Premium presses Charles for other collateral, and Charles suggests that he can sell him
the family portraits. Inwardly, Sir Oliver is shocked at the disrespect this shows to family tradition,
but he bids for the portraits in an auction. As the auction nears its end, Sir Oliver asks if Charles
will sell him a specific portrait. Charles refuses, saying that it is the portrait of his generous
benefactor Sir Oliver. Touched, Sir Oliver inwardly forgives Charles for being so extravagant.
In the next scene, Lady Teazle arrives late for a date with Joseph at his house. She
complains about her fights with Sir Peter, but is still unsure whether she wants to commit adultery
with Joseph. Sir Peter arrives and, terrified of being discovered, Lady Teazle hides behind a screen
in Joseph’s room as Sir Peter makes his way up the stairs. Sir Peter confides in Joseph that he is
worried his wife is having an affair with Charles, but that he plans to soon give her financial
independence from him, which he hopes will ease their fights. Sir Peter begins to talk to Joseph
about his desire to marry Maria, but Joseph tries to stop him, not wanting Lady Teazle to learn that
he is courting Maria too. At that moment, Charles arrives. Sir Peter says he will eavesdrop on the
brothers to discover the truth about Charles and his wife. Sir Peter tries to hide behind the screen,
but Joseph stops him, explaining that he already has a lover hiding there. Sir Peter hides in a closet
instead. Charles enters and Joseph asks him about Lady Teazle. Charles denies any involvement
with Lady Teazle and begins to say that he believed Joseph and Lady Teazle were the ones having
the affair. Joseph stops Charles by telling him Sir Peter is listening. Sir Peter comes out and tells
Charles he is very relieved. Joseph leaves the room for a moment and Sir Peter tells Charles that
his brother has a woman hidden in the room. As Joseph returns to the room, the screen is pulled
down to reveal Lady Teazle. Although Joseph tries to explain Lady Teazle’s presence there, Lady
Teazle tells her husband the truth: she was considering having an affair with Joseph, who she now
understands is a liar and hypocrite. She says that, even if she had not been discovered, she would
have changed her treatment of Sir Peter after hearing how kindly he spoke about her.
Soon after the Teazles leave, Joseph is visited by Sir Oliver, who pretends to be a poor
relative named Mr. Stanley. Joseph speaks politely and eloquently about charity, but he tells Mr.
Stanley that he has no money to give and that the rumors that his uncle sends him large sums of
money are false. Under his breath, Sir Oliver says that Charles will be his heir. After Sir Oliver
leaves, Rowley arrives to tell Joseph that his uncle has returned from the Indies and that he will
bring him to Joseph’s house soon to see him. Joseph curses the bad timing of his uncle’s arrival.
At Sir Peter’s house, the gossipmongers have gathered to try to find out what really
happened between the Teazles. The servant refuses them entry so they stand in an anteroom
arguing about what the real story is. Some believe that Sir Peter caught Lady Teazle with Charles,
while others allege that it was Joseph. They also report that Sir Peter was wounded in a duel fought
with the wife-stealing Surface brother, but there is no consensus about whether swords or pistols
were used in the fight. Sir Peter then walks in unharmed and shouts for the ridiculous gossips to
leave his house. Rowley and Sir Oliver arrive to tell Sir Peter to come to Joseph’s house for the
meeting between the Surface brothers and Sir Oliver. Rowley pleads Lady Teazle’s case, saying
that he spoke to her and she feels terrible for the pain and embarrassment she caused him. Upon
Rowley’s urging, Sir Peter decides to reconcile with Lady Teazle.
At Joseph’s house, Lady Sneerwell complains that Joseph ruined her chance to disrupt
Charles and Maria’s engagement by getting caught pursuing Lady Teazle. Joseph tells Lady
Sneerwell she may still have a chance with Charles because Snake has forged letters that suggest
Charles has pledged to marry Lady Sneerwell, which should also ruin Charles’s chances with
Maria. Sir Oliver and Charles arrive, and Lady Sneerwell hides in the next room. The brothers
wish to make a good impression on Sir Oliver and try to force the man they believe to be Mr.
Premium or Mr. Stanley from the room, fearing what he will say to their uncle about their behavior.
Sir Peter, Lady Teazle, Rowley, and Maria arrive, and the Teazles reveal to the Surface
brothers that the man they are throwing out of the house is their Uncle Oliver. Joseph tries to make
excuses for his behavior, but Charles only apologizes for having disrespected the family by selling
the portraits. Sir Oliver tells Charles he forgives him everything and Joseph that he sees through
his hypocrisy. Lady Teazle suggests that Charles may also be interested in gaining Maria’s
forgiveness, but Maria says that she knows he is already engaged to another. Charles is
dumbfounded. Lady Sneerwell emerges from hiding to claim that Charles is engaged to her, but
Rowley summons Snake, who reveals that he was paid to forge letters for Lady Sneerwell, but
paid double to reveal the truth to Rowley. Lady Sneerwell storms from the room in frustration and
Joseph follows. The play ends with an engagement between Maria and Charles, who will be his
uncle’s sole heir.
CHARACTERS
Sir Peter Teazle
Despite his eccentricities, Sir Peter Teazle seems generally respected. He has, for example,
been appointed Maria's guardian, and he served as a mentor to Joseph and Charles Surface after
the death of their father, who was Sir Peter's good friend. He also enjoys a close friendship with
Sir Oliver Surface, the young men's uncle. He is both conventional and eccentric, immersed in
petty quarrels with his lighthearted, flirtatious young wife. As the couple's name suggests, the
Teazles often irritate and grate on each other. But Sir Peter does seem to love Lady Teazle. What
sets Sir Peter apart from most of the other characters is his disapproval of Lady Sneerwell's
scandalmongering group.
Lady Teazle
Lady Teazle is the most dynamic character in the play since she undergoes a major change.
Presented at first as coquettish and flippant, she begins the play as an enthusiastic participant in
Lady Sneerwell's gossipy circle. She even entertains the possibility of an affair with Joseph Surface
in order to spite her irritable husband. However, when she is unmasked at the end of Act 4, Scene
3, Lady Teazle denounces hypocrisy and rejoins her husband.
Joseph Surface
Joseph Surface is in love with Maria, Sir Peter Teazle's ward, but his infatuation hinges not
on affection but on her money. Joseph poses as a prudent and modest person, and he is widely
considered to be a perfect foil for his extravagant, wastrel younger brother, Charles. However, it
is soon revealed that Joseph is a backstabber, a hypocrite, and something of a lecher. Joseph's high
moment in the play is Act 4, Scene 3. In the scene he plays the role of a nimble double dealer,
trying to juggle his money-driven attachment to Maria, his good standing with Sir Peter, and the
chances of an affair with Lady Teazle.
Charles Surface
Charles Surface's penchants for drinking, gambling, and womanizing cause him to be
perpetually short of funds, and he has run up large amounts of debt. His extravagances, in fact, are
the talk of London. Charles and Maria are in love, but his lack of respectability has caused Sir
Peter Teazle, Maria's guardian, to become increasingly unfavorable to any such match. Meanwhile,
Lady Sneerwell is secretly in love with Charles. Like the other characters named "Surface" in the
play, Charles Surface is not what he seems. In fact, his extravagant, dissipated exterior masks a
kind and charitable heart. This dimension of his character, however, is only gradually revealed in
the comedy. Charles's goodness is distinctly forecast by the character Rowley, who stoutly
maintains Charles is capable of reform.
Lady Sneerwell
Petty envy, a taste for mischief, and revenge for an old, slanderous injury to her reputation
cause Lady Sneerwell to plant scandalous stories in newspapers and magazines and to pass on
whatever nasty rumors she can collect about prominent socialites. Her group of fellow
gossipmongers includes Joseph Surface, Sir Benjamin Backbite, Crabtree, Snake, and, for a time,
Lady Teazle. Although Lady Sneerwell is a stock character, or stereotype, she is both
individualized and influential enough to justify her position as a major character in the play. Her
dialogue with Snake in Act 1, Scene 1, for example, reveals Lady Sneerwell as both all too human,
with her motives of revenge, and a "refined" practitioner of the art of gossip.
THEMES
Hypocrisy's Many Faces
Hypocrisy is a pervasive theme in The School for Scandal. The gossipers gathered
around Lady Sneerwell are, almost by definition, hypocritical. They pretend to be virtuous and
inoffensive, but in reality they are malicious, vain, and resentful. Lady Sneerwell, the leader of the
school for scandal, however, is largely free of hypocrisy. She frankly admits that her venomous
attacks on others have been fueled by revenge for a long-past injury to her own reputation.
Hypocrisy among the gossipmongers takes a variety of forms. Joseph Surface, in contrast
to Lady Sneerwell, has chosen to cloak himself in virtue even as he secretly harbors an egocentric,
selfish nature. Mrs. Candour presents another variation. As she maligns others, she feigns a
fatalistic attitude, asserting that scandal is inevitable because of the frailties of human nature.
Finally, there are the social upstarts like Sir Benjamin Backbite and his uncle, Crabtree. They long
to be considered as witty by members of the upper class, a desire that unleashes their poisonous
tongues.
Opposing these forces are several important characters. First is Lady Teazle, whose
dramatic conversion from scandalmongering to despising gossip is a major development in the
play. Second is Maria, who makes known her displeasure with gossip from the beginning. Third
is Sir Oliver Surface, who makes no bones about his unconventional attitudes and his respect for
authenticity. Finally, Sir Peter Teazle is hostile to the school for scandal from the beginning.
Snobbery's Stratified Society
The society portrayed in The School for Scandal is highly stratified. Sheridan portrays
occasional challenges to authority and ranks with Lady Teazle's defiance of Sir Peter Teazle.
However, there is little doubt that social norms dictate a firm hierarchy from top to bottom. The
hierarchy starts with the nobility and aristocracy, runs to the middle class and professionals, and
then extends down to the working and servant classes. For example, Sir Oliver and Sir Peter
outrank Rowley, who outranks Trip. As for Jewish moneylenders such as Moses, they are the
outsiders of society.
Many passages of dialogue in the play confirm these social divisions. For example, in Act
1, Scene 1 Crabtree reports the gossipy tidbit that Miss Nicely (presumably a woman of quality)
is going to be married to her own footman. According to the gossipers, her very prudent and
fastidious nature has made her vulnerable to rumors of impropriety. But the inherently juicy nature
of the news resides in snobbery over the fact that she has had an affair with a social underling.
The treatment of Jewish characters in the play furnishes a quite different set of examples
of social snobbery as well as of ethnic prejudice. To a certain extent, Jews in late 18th-century
Britain enjoyed a settled existence. However, many people of that era must have remembered that
Jews had been exiled in England for roughly three centuries until they were readmitted in 1656
under Oliver Cromwell (1599–1658). Although the Jews of Sheridan's time enjoyed a certain
respectability, there seems little doubt that they were considered second-class citizens.
Moneylending was admittedly useful, both socially and economically. At the same time, it was a
suspect vocation. One of the most powerful portraits of Jews in English drama was that of Shylock
in William Shakespeare's The Merchant of Venice (c. 1596–99). Another was the character of
Barabas in Christopher Marlowe's The Jew of Malta (c. 1589–90). Both of these characters, who
were portrayed as complex but also deeply flawed, would have been known by Sheridan's
audiences. It is notable that Sir Oliver Surface makes a prominent allusion to Shylock toward the
end of Act 3, Scene 3.
Reputation's Currency
Reputation is directly opposed to the mechanisms of scandal in the play. Two of Sir Peter
Teazle's scenes are especially important in developing the theme that reputation functions to
safeguard one's place in society. It functions as a sort of "social currency."
The first scene is Act 2, Scene 2, in which Sir Peter accompanies his young wife, Lady
Teazle, to Lady Sneerwell's house. Soon after he arrives Sir Peter alludes to Alexander Pope's
well-known mock-epic poem, The Rape of the Lock (1714). He remarks in an aside that the
scandalmongers (Lady Sneerwell, Mrs. Candour, Sir Benjamin Backbite, Crabtree, and Lady
Teazle) make "a character dead at every word." The allusion to Pope, which would presumably
have been recognized by Sheridan's audience, refers to the description of Hampton Court, a British
royal venue of the early 1700s. The stanza reads:
Hither the heroes and the nymphs resort, / To taste awhile the pleasures of a court; / In
various talk th' instructive hours they pass'd, / Who gave the ball, or paid the visit last; / One speaks
the glory of the British queen, / And one describes a charming Indian screen; / A third interprets
motions, looks, and eyes; / At ev'ry word a reputation dies.
Shortly afterward in the scene, Lady Teazle challenges Sir Peter on his opinions regarding
scandal. She quips merrily that her husband is "such an enemy to scandal" that he would endorse
a parliamentary prohibition of it. Sir Peter passionately responds that he would indeed approve of
such action. He draws an analogy between the prohibition of scandal and parliamentary legislation
against poaching. Penalties against poaching in the 18th century were notoriously severe, and
poachers were often sentenced to capital punishment.
In a second, vitally important scene showing the value of reputation, Sir Peter must deal
with the effects of Act 4, Scene 3. In Act 5, Scene 2 the absurdly escalated gossip makes clear that
the embarrassing visit by Lady Teazle to Joseph Surface's library is "all over the town already."
For Sir Peter, the embarrassment turns on the likelihood of being labeled a cuckold by malicious
mockers. As he declares to Sir Oliver later in the scene: "Oh, pray don't restrain your mirth on my
account: it does not hurt me at all! I laugh at the whole affair myself. Yes, yes, I think being a
standing jest for all one's acquaintance a very happy situation." His reputation functions as a
safeguard against such mockery.
The Superficiality of Fashion
Fashion is, by definition, fragile and perpetually in flux in the play. The theme of fashion's
superficiality can be seen as early as the second line of the prologue, where scandal is called "this
modish art."
Fashion is especially prominent in Act 2, Scene 1 when Lady Teazle justifies her
extravagant expenses on the grounds that a "woman of fashion" is called upon to maintain certain
standards of style. This includes the purchase of expensive flowers in cold weather. Sir Peter retorts
in vain that Lady Teazle, who hails from the countryside, had little to do with fashion before her
marriage to him.
The social milieu of Sheridan's characters clearly prizes stylishness and ostentation. As
early as Act 1, Scene 2 Sir Peter complains to Rowley about the contrast between the country girl
he thought he had married "with caution" and the pretentious, contrary young wife who is now
spending his fortune and playing a part in "all the extravagant fopperies of fashion and the town."
An emblem for the importance of fashion and style in comedies of this era is the title of
one of John Dryden's most successful Restoration plays, Marriage à la Mode (1673). The French
expression à la mode means "up-to-date" or "in the fashion."
Wit and Malice
From the Restoration-era plays onward, the proper application of wit whether for ill or
good—was a leading theme on the English comic stage. It was evident in the plays of William
Wycherley (1641–1716), John Dryden (1631–1700), John Vanbrugh (1664–1726), and George
Farquhar (1677–1707). "Wit" is etymologically derived from the ancient Greek verb oida,
meaning "I know." Wit was a predominantly intellectual concept, referring to intelligence,
cleverness, and facility of understanding. This springboard was the rationale for wit's connection
to humor and laughter.
In The School for Scandal the two characters that most clearly contest the definition and
the proper application of wit are Lady Sneerwell and Sir Peter Teazle. In Act 1, Scene 1 Lady
Sneerwell maintains that wit and malice are natural allies. She says, "There's no possibility of
being witty without a little ill nature: the malice of a good thing is the barb that makes it stick."
Hypocritical and obsequious, Joseph Surface hastens to agree: "Conversation, where the spirit of
raillery is suppressed, will ever appear tedious and insipid."
Sir Peter Teazle presents the other side of wit's coin in Act 2, Scene 2. Lady Sneerwell
charges him with being "too phlegmatic yourself for a jest, and too peevish to allow wit in others."
His retort directly contradicts what Sneerwell had maintained in Act 1. He says, "Ah, madam, true
wit is more nearly allied to good nature than your ladyship is aware of." To which Lady
Teazle chimes in, "True, Sir Peter: I believe they are so near akin that they can never be united."