Well Logging: Assignment 1 On
Well Logging: Assignment 1 On
Assignment 1 on:
Why:
In this paper the author will show that permeability anisotropy of several sandstones is a
function of overburden pressure. And he will show how it changes when it is subjected to
mechanical stress.
What:
In this paper the author will combine sleeve pressure and axial force to give permeability
changes which we believe are close to those occurring in reservoirs when reservoir pressure
changes.
How:
The Maasland and Kirkham method of measuring permeability anisotropy uses a cube of
porous material which is open on three faces and has discs with a center hole for an air inlet
cemented to the other three mutually perpendicular faces.
Limitations:
These experiments are made on the surface, so the conditions will not be the same. For
example, in these experiments we are assuming perfect elasticity, reservoir rock in situ cannot
be under hydrostatic stress as is apparent from the value of 0.25 for Poisson's ratio for most
rock with the absence of tectonic forces.
Results:
In this exploratory study only three components have been measured; and of these three, two
have been averaged together and called kH and the other kV. The permeability of an
anisotropic medium has in general six independent components.
Conclusion:
As both horizontal and vertical permeabilities are decreasing and the greater permeability is
decreasing more rapidly, the ratio of permeabilities will approach unity. So, permeability
reduction of sandstone cores subjected to simulated overburden pressure is shown to be a
function of the ratio of radial to axial stress.
Summary:
Introduction: In different petroleum fields the remarkable conduct of the reservoir has been
ascribed to the impact of overburden stress or inward fluid stresses on permeability or fluid
substance. In this paper the authors will show that permeability anisotropy of different
sandstones is an element of burden stress. They will likewise show that reduction in
permeability of round and hollow examples of two sandstones, when exposed to mechanical
pressure, is a component of the proportion of radial to axial stress. Most investigations of
overburden pressure impacts made before have aimed to copy conditions in reservoirs by
applying hydrostatic outer stresses on all surfaces of the example. An equation is found due to
some assumptions to find the horizontal and vertical components (sh and sv).
Method: The Maasland and Kirkham technique for estimating permeability anisotropy utilizes a
shape of permeable material which is open on three faces and has plates with a middle opening
for an air entry solidified to the next three commonly opposite appearances. So here another
equation is found which the equation is for apparent permeability:
Apparent permeabilities kA estimated along two commonly
opposite axes and determined from equation 3 are changed
over to a dimensionless Y factor where:
The sleeve was intended to take 2inches diameter centers up to 3in in length. Plastic tubing was
utilized for the sleeve. Plastic tubing was utilized for the sleeve. This tubing was drenched prior
to the introduction in the sleeve. After drainage the tubing shrank to design a tight fit. The
ending plugs had recorded faces so that wind flow would not be decreased when the fittings
were squeezed against the center. Permeabilities were estimated by Calhoun's technique.
Test Material: 1) BOISE SANDSTONE (Quarried sandstone, Grain% = 56%, grains are quartz and
feldspar, permeability = 0.5 to 2 D, porosity = 22 to 27 %)
2) BEREA SANDSTONE (Quarried sandstone, Grain% = 72%, grains are quartz and feldspar,
permeability = 100 to 400 mD, porosity = 20 to 24 %)
3) GRUBB SANDSTONE (Very fined grained, average permeability = 36 mD, average porosity =
15.8%)
We should pick which burden will be imitated by the cylinder; the sleeve at that imitates
pressure in the other two ways. Since the air stream during permeability estimations was
consistently corresponding to the axial load, we decided to consider the axial burden the
horizontal pressure. The sleeve pressure at that point imitates the vertical pressure and the flat
pressure at right points to the even pressure reproduced by the cylinder. Permeabilities
couldn't be estimated at zero outspread pressure on the grounds that under this condition,
there was no seal along the piston shaped surface of the example. Along these lines, the main
permeability estimation was at 500-psi outspread pressure. The bends were extrapolated to
give the penetrability at zero outer pressure.