Cryptlib 3.4.7 Product Manual 2023
Cryptlib 3.4.7 Product Manual 2023
Security Toolkit
Version 3.4.7
Copyright Peter Gutmann 1992-2023
July 2023
You may print a reasonable number of copies of this work for personal use in conjunction with
cryptlib software development provided that no fee is charged.
cryptlib Overview i
INTRODUCTION 1
cryptlib Overview 1
cryptlib features 2
Architecture 2
S/MIME 3
PGP/OpenPGP 3
SSH and SSL/TLS 4
PKI Services: CMP, SCEP, RTCS, OCSP, SCVP, TSP 4
Plug-and-play PKI 4
Certificate Management 4
CA Operations 6
Crypto Devices, Hardware, and Smart Card Support 8
Certificate Store Interface 8
Security Features 9
Embedded Systems 9
Performance 10
Programming Interface 10
Documentation 10
Algorithm Support 10
Standards Compliance 11
Configuration Options 12
cryptlib Applications 12
Encryption Code Example 12
Secure Session Code Example 13
Certificate Management Code Example 14
Document conventions 14
Recommended Reading 14
INSTALLATION 16
ARINC 653 16
AMX 16
BeOS 16
ChorusOS 16
CMSIS-RTOS/mbed-rtos 16
DOS32 17
eCOS 17
Embedded Linux 17
embOS 17
FreeRTOS/OpenRTOS 17
µITRON/T-Kernel 17
OS X and iOS 18
Mongoose OS 18
MQX 18
MVS 18
Nucleus 18
OS2 19
OSEK/AUTOSAR 19
PalmOS 19
QNX Neutrino 19
Quadros 19
RTEMS 20
SMX 20
Tandem 20
Telit 20
ThreadX 20
µC/OS-II 21
uClinux 21
Unix 21
VDK 22
ii Introduction
VM/CMS 22
VxWorks 22
Windows 23
Windows CE / Pocket PC / SmartPhone / Embedded 23
XMK 24
Other Systems 24
Key Database Setup 25
Configuration Issues 26
Optional cryptlib Components 26
Customised and Cut-down cryptlib Versions 27
Custom Cryptographic HALs 28
Debug vs. Release Versions of cryptlib 28
cryptlib Version Information 29
cryptlib and Cloud Computing 29
Support for Vendor-specific Algorithms 30
CRYPTLIB BASICS 31
Programming Interfaces 32
High-level Interface 32
Mid-level Interface 32
Low-level Interface 32
Objects and Interfaces 33
Objects and Attributes 33
Interfacing with cryptlib 34
Initialisation 34
C / C++ 35
C# / .NET 35
Delphi 36
Java 36
Python 37
Tcl 37
Visual Basic 37
Return Codes 38
Working with Object Attributes 39
Attribute Types 40
Attribute Lists and Attribute Groups 42
Attribute Cursor Management 43
Object Security 46
Role-based Access Control 48
Managing User Roles 49
Creating and Destroying Users and Roles 49
Miscellaneous Issues 50
Multi-threaded cryptlib Operation 50
Safeguarding Cryptographic Operations 51
DATA ENVELOPING 53
Creating/Destroying Envelopes 53
The Data Enveloping Process 54
Data Size Considerations 56
Basic Data Enveloping 57
Compressed Data Enveloping 59
Password-based Encryption Enveloping 60
Conventional Encryption Enveloping 62
Authenticated Enveloping 64
De-enveloping Mixed Data 65
De-enveloping with a Large Envelope Buffer 65
Obtaining Envelope Security Parameters 66
cryptlib Overview iii
VxWorks 317
XMK 317
Embedded cryptlib Configuration Options 318
Debugging with Embedded cryptlib 320
Special Considerations for Embedded Systems 320
Random Data Sources 320
Devices without a Real-time Clock 321
Devices without a Filesystem 322
Devices without Dynamic Memory Allocation 322
Cryptlib Memory Management 322
cryptlib Memory Usage 323
Tracking Memory Usage 323
DATABASE AND NETWORKING PLUGINS 324
The Database Backend Interface 324
Database Interface Functions 324
The Network Plugin Interface 328
Network Plugin Functions 328
ALGORITHMS AND STANDARDS CONFORMANCE 330
AES 330
CAST-128 330
DES 330
Triple DES 331
Diffie-Hellman 332
DSA 332
ECDSA 332
ECDH 332
Elgamal 333
HMAC-SHA1 333
HMAC-SHA2 333
IDEA 333
RC4 334
RSA 334
SHA1 334
SHA2/SHA256 334
DATA TYPES AND CONSTANTS 336
CRYPT_ALGO_TYPE 336
CRYPT_ATTRIBUTE_TYPE 337
CRYPT_CERTFORMAT_TYPE 337
CRYPT_CERTTYPE_TYPE 337
CRYPT_DEVICE_TYPE 338
CRYPT_FORMAT_TYPE 338
CRYPT_KEYID_TYPE 338
CRYPT_KEYOPT_TYPE 339
CRYPT_KEYSET_TYPE 339
CRYPT_MODE_TYPE 340
CRYPT_OBJECT_TYPE 340
CRYPT_SESSION_TYPE 340
Data Size Constants 341
Miscellaneous Constants 341
x Introduction
cryptImportKey 360
cryptInit 360
cryptKeysetClose 360
cryptKeysetOpen 361
cryptPopData 361
cryptPushData 361
cryptQueryCapability 362
cryptQueryObject 362
cryptSetAttribute 362
cryptSetAttributeString 363
cryptSignCert 363
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 364
cryptlib Overview 1
Introduction
The information age has seen the development of electronic pathways that carry vast
amounts of valuable commercial, scientific, and educational information between
financial institutions, companies, individuals, and government organisations.
Unfortunately the unprecedented levels of access provided by systems like the
Internet also expose this data to breaches of confidentiality, disruption of service, and
outright theft. As a result, there is an enormous (and still growing) demand for the
means to secure these online transactions. One report by the Computer Systems
Policy Project (a consortium of virtually every large US computer company,
including Apple, AT&T, Compaq, Digital, IBM, Silicon Graphics, Sun, and Unisys)
estimated that the potential revenue arising from these security requirements in the
US alone could be as much as US$30-60 billion in the next few years, and the
potential exposure to global users from a lack of this security is projected to reach
between US$320 and 640 billion.
Unfortunately the security systems required to protect data are generally extremely
difficult to design and implement, and even when available tend to require
considerable understanding of the underlying principles in order to be used. This has
lead to a proliferation of “snake oil” products that offer only illusionary security.
Many organisations have held back from deploying online information systems
because the means to secure them weren’t readily available, or because they
previously attempted weak, easily broken security that was unacceptable to users.
The cryptlib security toolkit provides the answer to this problem. A complete
description of the capabilities provided by cryptlib is given below.
cryptlib Overview
cryptlib is a powerful security toolkit that allows even inexperienced crypto
programmers to easily add encryption and authentication services to their software.
The high-level interface provides anyone with the ability to add strong security
capabilities to an application in as little as half an hour, without needing to know any
of the low-level details that make the encryption or authentication work. Because of
this, cryptlib dramatically reduces the cost involved in adding security to new or
existing applications.
At the highest level, cryptlib provides implementations of complete security services
such as S/MIME and PGP/OpenPGP secure enveloping, SSL/TLS and SSH secure
sessions, CA services such as CMP, SCEP, RTCS, OCSP, and SCVP, and other
security operations such as secure timestamping (TSP). Since cryptlib uses industry-
standard X.509, S/MIME, PGP/OpenPGP, and SSH/SSL/TLS data formats, the
resulting encrypted or signed data can be easily transported to other systems and
processed there, and cryptlib itself runs on virtually any operating system — cryptlib
doesn’t tie you to a single platform. This allows email, files, and EDI transactions to
be authenticated with digital signatures and encrypted in an industry-standard format.
cryptlib provides an extensive range of other capabilities including full X.509/PKIX
certificate handling (all X.509 versions from X.509v1 to X.509v3) with additional
support for SET, Microsoft AuthentiCode, Identrus, RPKI, SigG, S/MIME, SSL, and
Qualified certificates, PKCS #7 certificate chains, handling of certification requests
and CRLs including automated checking of certificates against CRLs and online
checking using RTCS, OCSP, and SCVP, and issuing and revoking certificates using
CMP and SCEP. In addition cryptlib implements a full range of certificate authority
(CA) functions, as well as providing complete CMP, SCEP, RTCS, OCSP, and SCVP
server implementations to handle online certificate enrolment/issue/revocation and
certificate status checking. Alongside the certificate handling, cryptlib provides a
sophisticated key storage interface that allows the use of a wide range of key database
types ranging from PKCS #11 devices, PKCS #15 key files, and PGP/OpenPGP key
rings through to commercial-grade RDBMS’ and LDAP directories with optional
SSL protection.
2 Introduction
In addition to its built-in capabilities, cryptlib can make use of the crypto capabilities
of a variety of external crypto devices such as hardware crypto accelerators, Fortezza
cards, PKCS #11 devices, hardware security modules (HSMs), and crypto smart
cards. For particularly demanding applications cryptlib can be used with a variety of
crypto devices that have received appropriate FIPS 140 or ITSEC/Common Criteria
certification. The crypto device interface also provides a convenient general-purpose
plug-in capability for adding new functionality that will be automatically used by
cryptlib. cryptlib also provides a general-purpose crypto HAL (hardware abstraction
layer) interface that allows it to use the native crypto capabilities available in some
ARM, MIPS, and PPC cores used in embedded systems and devices.
cryptlib is supplied as source code for AMX, BeOS, ChorusOS, CMSIS-
RTOS/mbed-rtos, DOS, DOS32, eCOS, µC/OS-II, embedded Linux,
FreeRTOS/OpenRTOS, IBM MVS, µITRON, Macintosh/OS X, MQX, OS/2,
PalmOS, RTEMS, Tandem, ThreadX, T-Kernel, a variety of Unix versions (including
AIX, Digital Unix, DGUX, FreeBSD/NetBSD/OpenBSD, HP-UX, IRIX, Linux, MP-
RAS, OSF/1, QNX, SCO/UnixWare, Solaris, SunOS, Ultrix, and UTS4), uClinux,
VM/CMS, VxWorks, Windows (32- and 64-bit versions), Windows
CE/PocketPC/SmartPhone/Embedded, VDK, and Xilinx XMK. cryptlib’s highly
portable nature means that it is also being used in a variety of custom embedded
system environments. cryptlib comes with language bindings for C / C++, C# /
.NET, Delphi, Java, Perl, Python, and Visual Basic (VB).
cryptlib features
cryptlib provides a standardised interface to a number of popular encryption
algorithms, as well as providing a high-level interface that hides most of the
implementation details and uses operating-system-independent encoding methods that
make it easy to transfer secured data from one operating environment to another.
Although use of the high-level interface is recommended, experienced programmers
can directly access the lower-level encryption routines for implementing custom
encryption protocols or methods not directly provided by cryptlib.
Architecture
cryptlib consists of a set of layered security services and associated programming
interfaces that provide an integrated set of information and communications security
capabilities. Much like the network reference model, cryptlib contains a series of
layers that provide each level of abstraction, with higher layers building on the
capabilities provided by the lower layers.
At the lowest level are basic components such as core encryption and authentication
routines, which are usually implemented in software but may also be implemented in
hardware (due to the speed of the software components used in cryptlib, the software
is usually faster than dedicated hardware). At the next level are components that
wrap up the specialised and often quite complex core components in a layer that
provides abstract functionality and ensures complete cross-platform portability of
data. These functions typically cover areas such as “create a digital signature” or
“exchange an encryption key”. At the highest level are extremely powerful and easy-
to-use functions such as “encrypt a message”, “sign a message”, “open a secure link”,
and “create a digital certificate” that require no knowledge of encryption techniques,
and that take care of complex issues such as key management, data encoding,
en/decryption, and digital signature processing.
cryptlib features 3
High-level interface
authentication capabilities into existing email agents and messaging software. Since
the enveloping interface is universal, the process involved in creating PGP and
S/MIME messages is identical except for the envelope format specifier, allowing a
one-off development effort to handle any secure message format.
SSH and SSL/TLS
cryptlib supports secure network sessions using the SSH and SSL/TLS security
protocols. As with envelopes, cryptlib takes care of the session details for you so that
all you need to do is provide basic communications information such as the name of
the server or host to connect to and any other information required for the session
such as a password or certificate. cryptlib takes care of establishing the session and
managing the details of the communications channel and its security parameters, and
provides both client and server implementations of all of these session types.
cryptlib also supports additional protocols in combination with the lower-layer
SSL/TLS secure tunnel. These include the WebSockets protocol in client and server
implementations and various EAP / RADIUS-based protocols including EAP-TLS,
EAP-TTLS, and EAP-PEAP in client implementations.
PKI Services: CMP, SCEP, RTCS, OCSP, SCVP, TSP
In addition to SSH and SSL/TLS, cryptlib also implements a full range of PKI
services in its secure session interface, again providing both client and server
implementations of all protocols. These services include the certificate management
protocol (CMP), simple certificate enrolment protocol (SCEP), real-time certificate
status protocol (RTCS), online certificate status protocol (OCSP), server-based
certificate validation protocol (SCVP), and timestamping (TSP).
By tying a key or certificate store to the session, you can let cryptlib take care of any
key management issues for you. With a CMP or SCEP server session cryptlib will
use the certificate store to handle the certificate management process. In this way a
complete CMP-based CA that handles enrolment, certificate update and renewal, and
certificate revocation, can be implemented with only a handful of function calls.
Plug-and-play PKI
Working with certificates can be complex and painful, requiring the use of a number
of arcane and difficult-to-use mechanisms to perform even the simplest operations.
To eliminate this problem cryptlib provides a plug-and-play PKI interface that
manages all certificate processing and management operations for you, requiring no
special knowledge of certificate formats, protocols, or operations. Using the plug-
and-play PKI interface with an appropriately-configured CA means that cryptlib will
automatically and transparently handle key generation, certificate enrolment, securely
obtaining trusted CA certificates, and certifying the newly-generated keys for the
user, all in a single operation. Similarly, certificate validity checking can be
performed using an online real-time status check that avoids the complexity and
delayed status information provided by mechanisms like CRLs. The plug-and-play
PKI interface removes most of the complexity and difficulty involved in working
with certificates, making it easier to use certificates than with any of the conventional
certificate management mechanisms.
Certificate Management
cryptlib implements full X.509 certificate support, including all X.509 version 3
extensions as well as extensions defined in the IETF PKIX certificate profile. cryptlib
also supports additional certificate types and extensions including SET certificates,
Microsoft AuthentiCode and Netscape and Microsoft server-gated crypto certificates,
Identrus certificates, qualified certificates, resource PKI (RPKI) certificates, S/MIME
and SSL client and server certificates, SigG extensions, and various vendor-specific
extensions such as Netscape certificate types and the Thawte secure extranet.
In addition to certificate handling, cryptlib allows the generation of certification
requests suitable for submission to certification authorities (CAs) in order to obtain a
certificate. Since cryptlib is itself capable of processing certification requests into
cryptlib features 5
CA
repository
Web
server
SSL
cryptlib CA server
LDAP
Cert request/ directory
Publish
retrieve
User
Retrieve
Local
certificate
repository
To handle certificate trust and revocation issues, cryptlib includes a certificate trust
manager that can be used to automatically manage CA trust settings. For example a
CA can be designated as a trusted issuer that will allow cryptlib to automatically
evaluate trust along certificate chains. Similarly, cryptlib can automatically check
certificates against RTCS, OCSP, and SCVP responders and CRLs published by CAs,
removing from the user the need to perform complex manual checking.
CA Operations
cryptlib includes a scalable, flexible Certificate Authority (CA) engine built on the
transaction-processing capabilities of a number of proven, industrial-strength
relational databases running on a variety of hardware platforms. The CA facility
provides an automated means of handling certificate issuance without dealing directly
with the details of processing request, signing certificates, saving the resulting
certificates in keys stores, and assembling CRLs. This constitutes a complete CA
system for issuance and management of certificates and CRLs. A typical cryptlib CA
configuration is shown below.
cryptlib features 7
Smart
card
Certificate Status
client client
CMP/SCEP/ RTCS/
PKCS #10 OCSP
cryptlib CA HSM
Certificate
LDAP
store
Certificates/CRLs
Available CA operations include:
• Certificate enrolment/initialisation operations
• Certificate issue
• Certificate update/key update
• Certificate expiry management
• Revocation request processing
• CRL issue
All CA operations are recorded to an event log using cryptlib’s built-in CA
logging/auditing facility, which provides a comprehensive audit facility via a full
account of certificate requests, certificates issued or renewed, revocations requested
and issued, certificates expired, and general CA management operations. The logs
can be queried for information on all events or a specified subset of events, for
example all certificates that were issued on a certain day.
cryptlib contains a full implementation of a CMP server (to handle online certificate
management), and SCEP server (to handle online certificate issue), a RTCS server (to
handle real-time certificate status checking), and a OCSP and SCVP servers (to
handle revocation checking). All of these servers are fully automated, requiring little
user intervention beyond the initial enrolment process in which user eligibility for a
certificate is established. These services make it easier than ever to manage your own
CA. Certificate expiration and revocation are handled automatically by the CA
engine. Expired certificates are removed from the certificate store, and CRLs are
assembled from previously processed certificate revocation requests. These
operations are handled with a single function call, for example issuing a CRL is done
with:
cryptCACertManagement( &cryptCRL, CRYPT_CERTACTION_ISSUE_CRL,
cryptCertStore, CRYPT_UNUSED );
Issued certificates can be stored on smart cards or similar crypto devices in addition
to being managed using software-only implementations. The CA facility supports the
simultaneous operation of multiple CAs, for example to manage users served through
divisional CAs certified by a root CA. Each CA can issue multiple certificates to
users, allowing the use of separate keys bound to signature and encryption
certificates.
Crypto Devices, Hardware, and Smart Card Support
In addition to its built-in capabilities, cryptlib can make use of the crypto capabilities
of external crypto devices and on-chip encryption accelerators, crypto cores, and
other hardware. External device types supported include:
• Crypto smart cards
• Dallas iButtons
• Datakeys/iKeys
• Fortezza cards
• Hardware crypto accelerators
• Hardware security modules (HSMs)
• PCMCIA crypto tokens
• PCI crypto cards
• PKCS #11 devices
• USB tokens
Both these external devices and on-chip encryption hardware present in some
embedded processors and devices can be used by cryptlib to handle functions such as
key generation and storage, certificate creation, digital signatures, and message en-
and decryption. Typical applications include:
• Running a certification authority inside tamper-resistant hardware
• Smart-card based digital signatures
• Message encryption/decryption in secure hardware
cryptlib manages any device-specific interfacing requirements so that the
programming interface for any crypto device is identical to cryptlib’s native interface,
allowing existing applications that use cryptlib to be easily and transparently migrated
to using crypto devices. The ability to mix and match crypto devices and the
software-only implementation allows appropriate tradeoffs to be chosen between
flexibility, cost, and security.
Certificate Store Interface
cryptlib utilizes commercial-strength RDBMS’ to store keys in the internationally
standardised X.509 format. The certificate store integrates seamlessly into existing
databases and can be managed using existing tools. For example a key database
stored on an MS SQL Server might be managed using Visual Basic or MS Access; a
key database stored on an Oracle server might be managed through SQL*Plus.
In addition to standard certificate stores, cryptlib supports the storage and retrieval of
certificates in LDAP directories, HTTP access for keys accessible via the web, and
external flat-file key collections such as PKCS #15 soft-tokens and PGP/OpenPGP
key rings. The key collections can be freely mixed (so for example a private key
could be stored in a PKCS #15 soft-token, a PGP/OpenPGP key ring or on a smart
card with the corresponding X.509 certificate being stored in a certificate store, an
LDAP directory, or on the web).
Private keys can be stored on disk encrypted with an algorithm such as AES
(selectable by the user), with the password processed using several thousand
cryptlib features 9
iterations of a hashing algorithm like SHA-256 (also selectable by the user) and the
key data protected from tampering with an algorithm like HMAC-SHA256 (again
selectable by the user). Where the operating system supports it, cryptlib will apply
system security features such as ACLs under Windows and file permissions under
Unix to the private key file to further restrict access.
Security Features
cryptlib is built around a security kernel with Orange Book B3-level security features
to implement its security mechanisms. This kernel provides the interface between the
outside world and the architecture’s objects (intra-object security) and between the
objects themselves (inter-object security). The security kernel is the basis of the
entire cryptlib architecture — all objects are accessed and controlled through it, and
all object attributes are manipulated through it. The kernel is implemented as an
interface layer that sits on top of the objects, monitoring all accesses and handling all
protection functions.
Each cryptlib object is contained entirely within the security perimeter, so that data
and control information can only flow in and out in a very tightly-controlled manner,
and objects are isolated from each other within the perimeter by the security kernel.
For example once keying information has been sent to an object, it can’t be retrieved
by the user except under tightly-controlled conditions. In general keying information
isn’t even visible to the user, since it’s generated inside the object itself and never
leaves the security perimeter. This design is ideally matched to hardware
implementations that perform strict red/black separation, since sensitive information
can never leave the hardware.
Associated with each object is a set of mandatory ACLs that determine who can
access a particular object and under which conditions the access is allowed. If the
operating system supports it, all sensitive information used will be page-locked to
ensure that it’s never swapped to disk from where it could be recovered using a disk
editor. All memory corresponding to security-related data is managed by cryptlib and
will be automatically sanitised and freed when cryptlib shuts down even if the calling
program forgets to release the memory itself.
Where the operating system supports it, cryptlib will apply operating system security
features to any objects that it creates or manages. For example under Windows
cryptlib private key files will be created with an access control list (ACL) that allows
only the key owner access to the file; under Unix the file permissions will be set to
achieve the same result.
Embedded Systems
cryptlib’s high level of portability and configurability makes it ideal for use in
embedded systems with limited resources or specialised requirements, including ones
based on Altera NIOS, ARM7, ARM9, ARM TDMI, Coldfire, Fujitsu FR-V, Hitachi
SuperH, MIPS IV, MIPS V, Motorola ColdFire, NEC V8xx series, NEC VRxxxx
series, Panasonic/Matsushita AM33/AM34, PowerPC, PowerQUICC, Samsung
CalmRISC, SH3, SH4, SPARC, SPARClite, StrongArm, TI OMAP, and Xilinx
MicroBlaze processors, as well as a large range of licensed derivatives of these cores,
too many and varied to enumerate here. cryptlib doesn’t perform any floating-point
operations and runs directly on processors without an FPU, and through its crypto
HAL (hardware abstraction layer) capabilities can take advantage of on-chip or in-
system cryptographic hardware capabilities and crypto cores where available,
typically on some of the more advanced ARM, MIPS, and PPC cores.
The code is fully independent of any underlying storage or I/O mechanisms, and
works just as easily with abstractions like named memory segments in flash memory
as it does with standard key files on disk. It has been deployed on embedded systems
without any conventional I/O capabilities (stdio) or dynamic memory allocation
facilities, with proprietary operating system architectures and services including
ATMs, printers, web-enabled devices, POS systems, embedded device controllers,
and similar environments, and even in devices with no operating system at all
(cryptlib runs on the bare metal). It can also run independent of any form of
10 Introduction
operating system, and has been run on the bare metal in environments with minimal
available resources, in effect functioning as a complete crypto operating system for
the underlying hardware.
Because cryptlib functions identically across all supported environments, it’s possible
to perform application development in a full-featured development environment such
as Windows or Unix and only when the application is complete and tested move it to
the embedded system. This flexibility saves countless hours of development time,
greatly reducing the amount of time that needs to be spent with embedded systems
debuggers or in-circuit emulators since most of the development and code testing can
be done on the host system of choice.
If required the cryptlib developers can provide assistance in moving the code to any
new or unusual environments.
Performance
cryptlib is re-entrant and completely thread-safe, allowing it to be used with
multithreaded applications under operating systems that support threads. Because it
is thread-safe, lengthy cryptlib operations can be run in the background if required
while other processing is performed in the foreground. In addition cryptlib itself is
multithreaded so that computationally intensive internal operations take place in the
background without impacting the performance of the calling application.
Many of the core algorithms used in cryptlib have been implemented in assembly
language in order to provide the maximum possible performance, and will take
advantage of crypto hardware acceleration facilities present in some CPUs such as the
Via CPU family. These routines provide an unprecedented level of performance, in
most cases running faster than expensive, specialised encryption hardware designed
to perform the same task. This means that cryptlib can be used for high-bandwidth
applications such as video/audio encryption and online network and disk encryption
without the need to resort to expensive, specialised encryption hardware.
Programming Interface
cryptlib’s easy-to-use high-level routines allow for the exchange of encrypted or
signed messages or the establishment of secure communications channels with a
minimum of programming overhead. Language bindings are available for C / C++,
C# / .NET, Delphi, Java, Perl, Python and Visual Basic (VB).
cryptlib has been written to be as foolproof as possible. On initialisation it performs
extensive self-testing against test data from encryption standards documents, and the
APIs check each parameter and function call for errors before any actions are
performed, with error reporting down to the level of individual parameters. In
addition logical errors such as, for example, a key exchange function being called in
the wrong sequence, are checked for and identified.
Documentation
cryptlib comes with extensive documentation in the form of a 350-page user manual
and a 320-page technical reference manual. The user manual is intended for
everyday cryptlib use and contains detailed documentation on every aspect of
cryptlib’s functionality. In most cases the code needed to secure an application can
be cut and pasted directly from the appropriate section of the manual, avoiding the
need to learn yet another programming API.
The technical reference manual covers the design and internals of cryptlib itself,
including the cryptlib security model and security mechanisms that protect every part
of cryptlib’s operation. In addition the technical manual provides a wealth of
background information to help users understand the security foundations on which
cryptlib is built.
Algorithm Support
Included as core cryptlib components are implementations of the most popular
encryption and authentication algorithms, AES, CAST, DES, triple DES, IDEA and
cryptlib features 11
1
The DSA standard only defines key sizes from 512 to 1024 bits, cryptlib supports longer keys.
12 Introduction
4253, RFC 4254, RFC 4256, RFC 4262, RFC 4279, RFC 4325, RFC 4334, RFC
4346, RFC 4366, RFC 4387, RFC 4419, RFC 4476, RFC 4492, RFC 4648, RFC
4680, RFC 4681, RFC 4853, RFC 4880, RFC 4945, RFC 5035, RFC 5055, RFC
5083, RFC 5246, RFC 5280, RFC 5288, RFC 5289, RFC 5430, RFC 5480, RFC
5652, RFC 5746, RFC 5750, RFC 5751, RFC 5753, RFC 5754, RFC 5756, RFC
5758, RFC 5816, RFC 5911, RFC 5912, RFC 6211, RFC 7539, RFC 7905 and RFC
8439. In addition cryptlib can be used as an add-on security module to provide
security services as per ISO/IEC 62351 for SCADA protocols such as IEC 60870-5,
DNP 3.0, IEC 60870-6 (TASE.2 or ICCP), IEC 61850, and IEC 61334 (DLMS), and
for the Payment Card Industry (PCI) Data Security Standard (PCI-DSS). Because of
the use of internationally recognised and standardised security algorithms, cryptlib
users will avoid the problems caused by home-grown, proprietary algorithms and
security techniques that often fail to provide any protection against attackers,
resulting in embarrassing bad publicity and expensive product recalls.
Configuration Options
cryptlib works with a configuration database that can be used to tune its operation for
different environments. This allows a system administrator to set a consistent
security policy which is then automatically applied by cryptlib to operations such as
key generation and data encryption and signing, although they can be overridden on a
per-application or per-user basis if required.
cryptlib Applications
The security services provided by cryptlib can be used in virtually any situation that
requires the protection or authentication of sensitive data. Some areas in which
cryptlib is currently used include:
• Protection of medical records transmitted over electronic links.
• Protection of financial information transmitted between branches of banks.
• Transparent disk encryption.
• Strong security services added to web browsers with weak, exportable
security.
• Running a CA.
• Encrypted electronic mail.
• File encryption.
• Protecting content on Internet servers.
• Digitally signed electronic forms.
• S/MIME mail gateway.
• Secure database access.
• Protection of credit card information.
Encryption Code Example
The best way to illustrate what cryptlib can do is with an example. The following
code encrypts a message using public-key encryption.
/* Create an envelope for the message */
cryptCreateEnvelope( &cryptEnvelope, cryptUser, CRYPT_FORMAT_SMIME );
/* Push in the message data and pop out the encrypted result */
cryptPushData( cryptEnvelope, message, messageSize, &bytesIn );
cryptFlushData( cryptEnvelope );
cryptPopData( cryptEnvelope, encryptedMessage, encryptedSize,
&bytesOut );
/* Clean up */
cryptDestroyEnvelope( cryptEnvelope );
This performs the same task as a program like PGP using just 6 function calls (to
create a PGP/OpenPGP message, just change the CRYPT_FORMAT_SMIME to
CRYPT_FORMAT_PGP). All data management is handled automatically by
cryptlib, so there’s no need to worry about encryption modes and algorithms and key
lengths and key types and initialisation vectors and other details (although cryptlib
provides the ability to specify all this if you feel the need). This is all that’s required
— just copy the above code into your application to S/MIME-enable it.
The code shown above results in cryptlib performing the following actions:
• Generate a random session key for the default encryption algorithm (usually
AES).
• Look up the recipient’s public key in a key database.
• Encrypt the session key using the recipient’s public key.
• Encrypt the signed data with the session key.
• Pass the result back to the user.
However unless you want to call cryptlib using the low-level interface, you never
need to know about any of this. cryptlib will automatically know what to do with the
data based on the resources you add to the envelope — if you add a signature key it
will sign the data, if you add an encryption key it will encrypt the data, and so on.
Secure Session Code Example
Establishing a secure session using SSL/TLS is similarly easy:
CRYPT_SESSION cryptSession;
This code takes a smart card and generates separate encryption and signing keys in it,
requests a signature certificate from the CA for the signing key, uses that to obtain a
certificate for the encryption key, obtains any further certificates that may be needed
from the CA (for example for S/MIME signing or SSL server operation), and stores
everything in the smart card. Compare this to the hundreds or even thousands of lines
of code required to do the same thing using other toolkits.
Oh yes, and cryptlib provides the CA-side functionality as well — there’s no need to
pay an expensive commercial CA for your certificates, since cryptlib can perform the
same function.
Document conventions
This manual uses the following document conventions:
Example Description
cryptlib.h This font is used for filenames.
cryptCreateContext Bold type indicates cryptlib function names.
Value Words or portions of words in italics indicate
placeholders for information that you need to
supply.
if( i == 0 ) This font is used for sample code and operating
system commands.
Recommended Reading
Cryptographic Security Architecture Design and Verification by Peter Gutmann is the
technical documentation for cryptlib and complements the cryptlib user manual. It
contains full details of the architectural and security features of cryptlib, as well as a
wealth of background material to help you understand the security foundations on
which cryptlib is built.
One of the best books to help you understand the crypto mechanisms used in cryptlib
is Network Security by Charlie Kaufman, Radia Perlman, and Mike Speciner, which
covers general security principles, encryption techniques, and a number of potential
cryptlib applications such as X.400/X.500 security, PEM/S/MIME/PGP, Kerberos,
and various other security, authentication, and encryption techniques. The book also
contains a wealth of practical advice for anyone considering implementing a
cryptographic security system. Security Engineering: A Guide to Building
Dependable Distributed Systems by Ross Anderson also contains a large amount of
useful information and advice on engineering secure systems. Building Secure
Software by John Viega and Gary McGraw and Writing Secure Software by Michael
Recommended Reading 15
Installation
This chapter describes how to install cryptlib for a variety of operating systems. Note
that embedded systems are usually built using cross-compilers which means that they
require specialised handling of things like compiler options and include and library
paths. Please refer to the documentation for your development environment for
information on how to configure the build process. As a general rule for cross-
compilation you can set any platform-specific compiler or build options that you may
need via the XCFLAGS variable at the start of the makefile. For example if your
build environment doesn’t otherwise allow you to specify a non-standard include path
and you need to include header files from /opt/devkit/arm/include you would
modify the XCFLAGS variable to include -I/opt/devkit/arm/include.
ARINC 653
ARINC 653 is a safety-critical RTOS, or at least an RTOS kernel accessed via the
APEX API. The APEX API provides a minimum set of system services that are then
integrated into a higher-level RTOS. cryptlib uses the minimal APEX API to access
ARINC 653-level functionality, but also requires additional functionality not
provided in ARINC 653 for operations like memory management. Please contact the
cryptlib developers before using the ARINC 653 functionality in cryptlib.
AMX
The AMX Multitasking Executive is an RTOS from KADAK Products with
development hosted under Unix or Windows. You can build cryptlib for AMX using
the cross-compilation capabilities of the standard makefile, see the entry for Unix on
page 21 for more details on working with the makefile. The make targets for AMX
are target-amx-arm, target-amx-mips, target-amx-ppc, and target-amx-arm,
other targets can be added as variations on the existing rules. Due to the wide
variation of environments and toolchains it may be necessary to modify the
configuration slightly to build the code. Details on building and using cryptlib for
AMX, and on embedded cryptlib in general, are given in “Embedded Systems” on
page 314.
BeOS
The BeOS version of cryptlib can be built using a procedure which is identical to that
given for Unix on page 21. Any current version of BeOS can build the code directly
from the Unix makefile. Old versions of BeOS using the Be development
environment will require that you edit the Unix makefile slightly by un-commenting
the marked lines at the start of the file.
ChorusOS
ChorusOS is an embedded OS with development hosted under Unix. You can build
cryptlib for ChorusOS using the cross-compilation capabilities of the standard
makefile, see the entry for Unix on page 21 for more details on working with the
makefile. The make target for ChorusOS is target-chorus, other targets can be
added as variations on the existing rule. Due to the wide variation of environments
and toolchains it may be necessary to modify the configuration slightly to build the
code. Details on building and using cryptlib for ChorusOS, and on embedded
cryptlib in general, are given in “Embedded Systems” on page 314.
CMSIS-RTOS/mbed-rtos
CMSIS-RTOS/mbed-rtos is a real-time kernel with development hosted under
Windows. You can build cryptlib for CMSIS-RTOS using the cross-compilation
capabilities of the standard makefile, see the entry for Unix on page 21 for more
details on working with the makefile. The make target for CMSIS-RTOS is target-
cmsis. Details on building and using cryptlib for CMSIS-RTOS, and on embedded
cryptlib in general, are given in “Embedded Systems” on page 314.
Recommended Reading 17
DOS32
The 32-bit DOS version of cryptlib can be built using the supplied makefile, which
requires the djgpp compiler. The DOS32 version of cryptlib uses the same 32-bit
assembly language code used by the Win32 and 80x86 Unix versions, so it runs
significantly faster than the 16-bit DOS version. Like the 16-bit DOS version, any
attempt to use the high-level key export routines will fail with a CRYPT_ERROR_-
RANDOM error code unless a /dev/random-style driver is available because there
isn’t any way to reliably obtain random data under DOS. You can however treat
DOS as an embedded systems environment and use the random seeding capability
described in “Random Numbers” on page 292.
eCOS
eCOS is an embedded/real-time OS (RTOS) with development hosted under Unix or
Windows. You can build cryptlib for eCOS using the cross-compilation capabilities
of the standard makefile, see the entry for Unix on page 21 for more details on
working with the makefile. The make target for eCOS is target-ecos-arm, target-
ecos-ppc, target-ecos-sh, and target-ecos-x86, other targets can be added as
variations on the existing rules. Due to the wide variation of environments and
toolchains it may be necessary to modify the configuration slightly to build the code.
Details on building and using cryptlib for eCOS, and on embedded cryptlib in
general, are given in “Embedded Systems” on page 314.
Embedded Linux
The embedded Linux version of cryptlib can be built using the standard Linux
development tools. Since this environment is identical to the generic Unix one, the
installation instructions for Unix on page 21 apply here.
embOS
embOS is an embedded OS from Segger, with development hosted under Unix or
Windows. You can build cryptlib for embOS using the cross-compilation capabilities
of the standard makefile, see the entry for Unix on page 21 for more details on
working with the makefile. The make target for embOS is target-embos, other
targets can be added as variations on the existing rules. Due to the wide variation of
environments and toolchains it may be necessary to modify the configuration slightly
to build the code. Details on building and using cryptlib for embOS, and on
embedded cryptlib in general, are given in “Embedded Systems” on page 314.
FreeRTOS/OpenRTOS
FreeRTOS/OpenRTOS is an RTOS from Real Time Engineers with development
hosted under Windows. You can build cryptlib for FreeRTOS/OpenRTOS using the
cross-compilation capabilities of the standard makefile, see the entry for Unix on
page 21 for more details on working with the makefile. The make target for
FreeRTOS/OpenRTOS is target-freertos-arm, target-freertos-mb, and target-
freertos-ppc, other targets can be added as variations on the existing rules. Due to
the wide variation of environments and toolchains it may be necessary to modify the
configuration slightly to build the code. Details on building and using cryptlib for
FreeRTOS/OpenRTOS, and on embedded cryptlib in general, are given in
“Embedded Systems” on page 314.
µITRON/T-Kernel
µITRON and T-Kernel are embedded/real-time OSes (RTOS) with development
usually hosted under Unix or a Unix-like OS. You can build cryptlib for µITRON or
T-Kernel using the cross-compilation capabilities of the standard makefile, see the
entry for Unix on page 21 for more details on working with the makefile. The make
target for µITRON is target-itron and for T-Kernel is target-tkernel, other
targets can be added as variations on the existing rules. Due to the wide variation of
environments and toolchains it may be necessary to modify the configuration slightly
18 Installation
to build the code. Details on building and using cryptlib for µITRON and T-Kernel,
and on embedded cryptlib in general, are given in “Embedded Systems” on page 314.
OS X and iOS
The standard Macintosh build environment uses Apple’s Mac OS X command-line
developer tools, driven by the standard makefile, for which the instructions in the
section on building cryptlib for Unix on page 21 apply. Building for iOS works
similarly to the OS X build, with the make target being given as target-ios. If
necessary you can override auto-detection of the iOS SDK type by giving the make
target type as target-ios6, target-ios7, target-ios8, or target-ios9.
Mongoose OS
Mongoose OS is an IoT development framework from Cesanta Software with
development hosted under Unix or Windows. You can build cryptlib for Mongoose
OS using the cross-compilation capabilities of the standard makefile, see the entry for
Unix on page 21 for more details on working with the makefile. The make target for
Mongoose OS is target-mgos, other targets can be added as variations on the
existing rules. Due to the wide variation of environments and toolchains it may be
necessary to modify the configuration slightly to build the code. Details on building
and using cryptlib for Mongoose OS, and on embedded cryptlib in general, are given
in “Embedded Systems” on page 314.
MQX
MQX is an RTOS from Precise Software Technologies and others with development
hosted under Unix or Windows. You can build cryptlib for MQX using the cross-
compilation capabilities of the standard makefile, see the entry for Unix on page 21
for more details on working with the makefile. The make target for MQX is target-
mqx, other targets can be added as variations on the existing rules. Due to the wide
variation of environments and toolchains it may be necessary to modify the
configuration slightly to build the code. Details on building and using cryptlib for
MQX, and on embedded cryptlib in general, are given in “Embedded Systems” on
page 314.
MVS
The MVS version of cryptlib can be built using the standard IBM C/C++ compiler
and accompanying tools. Since this environment is very similar to the Unix one, the
installation instructions for Unix on page 21 apply here also. Note that PTF
UQ50384 (which fixes a bug in the macro version of the strcat function as
described in APAR PQ43130) is required if you’re using the V2R10 C/C++ compiler.
You can control the use of ddnames with the DDNAME_IO define. If DDNAME_IO
is defined when building the code, cryptlib will use ddnames for all I/O, and user
options will be saved in dynamically allocated datasets userid.CRYPTLIB.filename.
If DDNAME_IO is not defined when building the code, cryptlib will use HFS for all
I/O, and user options will be saved in $HOME/.cryptlib.
After you’ve built cryptlib, you should run the self-test program to make sure that
everything is working OK. You can use the ussalloc USS shell script to allocate
MVS data sets for testlib, and the usscopy shell script to copy the files in the test
directory to the MVS data sets allocated with ussalloc. testlib.jcl is the JCL needed
to execute testlib.
Nucleus
Nucleus is an RTOS from Mentor Graphics with development hosted under Unix or
Windows. You can build cryptlib for Nucleus using the cross-compilation
capabilities of the standard makefile, see the entry for Unix on page 21 for more
details on working with the makefile. The make target for Nucleus is target-
nucleus, other targets can be added as variations on the existing rules. Due to the
wide variation of environments and toolchains it may be necessary to modify the
configuration slightly to build the code. Details on building and using cryptlib for
Recommended Reading 19
RTEMS
The Real-Time Operating System for Multiprocessor Systems (RTEMS) is an RTOS
from OAR Corporation with development hosted under Unix or Windows. You can
build cryptlib for RTEMS using the cross-compilation capabilities of the standard
makefile, see the entry for Unix on page 21 for more details on working with the
makefile. The make target for RTEMS is target-rtems-arm, target-rtems-mips,
target-rtems-ppc, and target-rtems-x86, other targets can be added as variations
on the existing rules. Due to the wide variation of environments and toolchains it
may be necessary to modify the configuration slightly to build the code. Details on
building and using cryptlib for RTEMS, and on embedded cryptlib in general, are
given in “Embedded Systems” on page 314.
SMX
The SMX RTOS is a real-time OS (RTOS) with development hosted under Unix or
Windows. You can build cryptlib for SMX using the cross-compilation capabilities
of the standard makefile, see the entry for Unix on page 21 for more details on
working with the makefile. The make target for SMX is target-smx, other targets
can be added as variations on the existing rules. Due to the wide variation of
environments and toolchains it may be necessary to modify the configuration slightly
to build the code. Details on building and using cryptlib for SMX, and on embedded
cryptlib in general, are given in “Embedded Systems” on page 314.
Tandem
The Tandem version of cryptlib can be built using the standard c89 compiler and
accompanying tools under the OSS environment. Since this environment is very
similar to the Unix one, the installation instructions for Unix on page 21 apply here
also. The default target is Tandem OSS, you can re-target the built for NSK using the
-Wsystype=guardian directive in the makefile.
The Guardian sockets implementation changed in newer releases of the OS. Older
releases required the use of non-standard nowait sockets handled via AWAITIOX()
instead of the standard BSD sockets interface. If you’re running an older version of
the OS and need to use any of the secure networking protocols such as SSL/TLS,
SSH, CMP, SCEP, RTCS, OCSP, or SCVP, you’ll need to use cryptlib’s alternative
network data-handling strategy described in “Network Issues” on page 130.
Telit
Telit is an IoT/M2M platform from Telit Communications with development hosted
under Unix or Windows. You can build cryptlib for Telit using the cross-compilation
capabilities of the standard makefile, see the entry for Unix on page 21 for more
details on working with the makefile. The make target for Telit is target-telit,
other targets can be added as variations on the existing rules. Due to the wide
variation of environments and toolchains it may be necessary to modify the
configuration slightly to build the code. Details on building and using cryptlib for
Telit, and on embedded cryptlib in general, are given in “Embedded Systems” on
page 314.
ThreadX
ThreadX (and optionally FileX) is an RTOS from Express Logic with development
hosted under Unix or Windows. You can build cryptlib for RTEMS using the cross-
compilation capabilities of the standard makefile, see the entry for Unix on page 21
for more details on working with the makefile. The make target for ThreadX is
target-threadx-arm, target-threadx-mb, target-threadx-mips, target-
threadx-ppc, and target-threadx-x86, other targets can be added as variations on
the existing rules. Due to the wide variation of environments and toolchains it may
be necessary to modify the configuration slightly to build the code. Details on
building and using cryptlib for ThreadX, and on embedded cryptlib in general, are
given in “Embedded Systems” on page 314.
Recommended Reading 21
µC/OS-II
µC/OS-II is an embedded/ RTOS from Micrium with development usually hosted
under Windows. You can build cryptlib for µC/OS-II using the cross-compilation
capabilities of the standard makefile, see the entry for Unix on page 21 for more
details on working with the makefile. The make target for µC/OS-II is target-ucos-
arm, target-ucos-ppc, and target-ucos-x86, other targets can be added as
variations on the existing rules. Due to the wide variation of environments and
toolchains it may be necessary to modify the configuration slightly to build the code.
Details on building and using cryptlib for µC/OS-II, and on embedded cryptlib in
general, are given in “Embedded Systems” on page 314.
uClinux
uClinux is a real-mode/embedded version of Linux with development hosted under
Unix. You can build cryptlib for uClinux using the cross-compilation capabilities of
the standard makefile, see the entry for Unix on page 21 for more details on working
with the makefile. The make target for uClinux is target-uclinux, so you’d build
cryptlib with make target-uclinux. Details on building and using cryptlib for
uClinux, and on embedded cryptlib in general, are given in “Embedded Systems” on
page 314.
Unix
To unzip the code under Unix use the -a option to ensure that the text files are
converted to the Unix format. The makefile by default will build the statically-linked
library when you invoke it with make. To build the shared library, use make shared.
Once cryptlib has been built, use make testlib to build the cryptlib self-test program
testlib, or make stestlib to build the shared-library self-test program stestlib. This
will run fairly extensive self-tests of cryptlib that you can run after you’ve built it to
make sure that everything is working OK. testlib needs to be run from the cryptlib
root directory (the one that the main data files are in) since it uses a large number of
pre-generated data files that are located in a subdirectory below this one. Depending
on your system setup and privileges you may need to either copy the shared library to
/usr/lib or set the LD_LIBRARY_PATH environment variable (or an OS-specific
equivalent) to make sure that the shared library is used.
If you’re using the statically-linked form of cryptlib in your application rather than
the shared library, you’ll probably need to link in additional (system-specific) static
libraries to handle threads, network access, and system-specific odds and ends. The
makefile contains a list of the needed additional libraries, ordered by system type and
version. The shared-library version of cryptlib doesn’t require these additional
libraries to be linked in, since the references are automatically resolved by the OS.
By default the makefile will build a version of cryptlib that’s optimised for the system
that it’s running on. If you’re building cryptlib for use on a wide range of systems
including ones with CPUs older than the one used by the current system, you should
use make generic rather than make. This will fall back to lowest-common-
denominator code generation that’s portable across a wide range of older CPUs, at the
cost of a slight loss in performance.
If your system doesn’t come pre-configured with a /dev/random, EGD, or PRNGD-
style style randomness driver (which continually accumulates random data from the
system), you may want to download one and install it, since cryptlib will make use of
it for gathering entropy. cryptlib has a built-in randomness polling subsystem so it
will function without an external randomness driver, but it never hurts to have one
present to supplement the internal entropy polling.
If you’re using a key database or certificate store, you need to enable the use of the
appropriate interface module for the database backend. Details are given in “Key
Database Setup” on page 25. For the cryptlib self-test code you can define the
database libraries using the TESTLIBS setting at the start of the makefile. If you don’t
enable the use of a database interface, the self-test code will issue a warning that no
key database is present and continue without testing the database interface.
22 Installation
If you’re using an LDAP directory, you need to install the required LDAP client
library on your system, enable the use of LDAP using the USE_LDAP define before
you build cryptlib, and link the LDAP client library into your executable (on most
systems the cryptlib build scripts will take care of this automatically). If you don’t
enable the use of an LDAP directory interface, the self-test code will issue a warning
that no LDAP directory interface is present and continue without testing the LDAP
interface.
If you’re using special encryption hardware or an external encryption device such as a
smart card, you need to install the required device drivers on your system and enable
their use when you build cryptlib by linking in the required interface libraries. If you
don’t enable the use of a crypto device, the self-test code will issue a warning that no
devices are present and continue without testing the crypto device interface.
If your application forks, you shouldn’t need to take any special actions for cryptlib
beyond the usual precautions with forking a process. In particular forking a process
that contains multiple threads has system-specific semantics, with the behaviour
depending on whether the system implements fork1 or forkall behaviour. With fork1
behaviour (the Posix default), only the thread that calls fork() is copied to the child.
With forkall, all threads in the process are copied. The fork1 behaviour can lead to
deadlock if a thread other than the one that called fork() holds a lock, since the fact
that it’s not copied to the child means that it’ll never be released. You can work
around this with pthread_atfork() to handle lock management, but a better
approach is to simply not mix threads and forking unless you follow the fork() with
an exec(). Note that this isn’t a cryptlib issue, it’s specific to the interaction of
fork() and threads.
For any common Unix system, cryptlib will build without any problems, but in some
rare cases you may need to edit random/unix.c and possibly io/file.h and io/tcp.h if
you’re running an unusual Unix variant that puts include files in strange places or has
broken Posix or sockets support.
VDK
The Visual DSP++ Kernel (VDK) from Analog Devices is a kernel for AD
processors with development hosted under Windows. You can build cryptlib for
VDK using the cross-compilation capabilities of the standard makefile, see the entry
for Unix on page 21 for more details on working with the makefile. The make target
for VDK is target-vdk, other targets can be added as variations on the existing rules.
Due to the wide variation of environments and toolchains it may be necessary to
modify the configuration slightly to build the code. Details on building and using
cryptlib for VDK, and on embedded cryptlib in general, are given in “Embedded
Systems” on page 314.
VM/CMS
The VM/CMS version of cryptlib can be built using the standard C/370 compiler and
accompanying tools. The supplied EXEC2 file VMBUILD EXEC will build cryptlib
as a TXTLIB and then build the self-test program as an executable MODULE file.
Since VM sites typically have different system configurations, this file and possibly
portions of the source code may require tuning in order to adjust it to suit the build
process normally used at your site.
VxWorks
VxWorks is an embedded/ RTOS from VxWorks with development hosted under
Unix or Windows. You can build cryptlib for VxWorks using the cross-compilation
capabilities of the standard makefile, see the entry for Unix on page 21 for more
details on working with the makefile. The make target for VxWorks is target-
vxworks-arm, target-vxworks-mb, target-vxworks-mips, target-vxworks-ppc,
and target-vxworks-x86, other targets can be added as variations on the existing
rules. Due to the wide variation of environments and toolchains it may be necessary
to modify the configuration slightly to build the code. Details on building and using
Recommended Reading 23
cryptlib for VxWorks, and on embedded cryptlib in general, are given in “Embedded
Systems” on page 314.
Windows
The cryptlib distribution ships with pre-built 32- and 64-bit cryptlib DLLs built using
the default configuration (see “Configuration Issues” on page 26). You can use these
directly in your application, or if you prefer to build your own copies from the source
code or want to build a customised version then you can build the 32- and 64-bit
cryptlib DLLs using the crypt32 project file for Visual Studio (there’s also a legacy
Visual C++ 6 .dsw project file present, but the supported configuration uses Visual
Studio). Once the DLL has been built, either as cl32.dll or cl64.dll, the test32
project file will build the cryptlib self-test program test32 or test64, which is a
console application. You can run this after you’ve built cryptlib to make sure that
everything is working OK. The self-test program needs to be run from the cryptlib
root directory (the one that the main data files are in) since it uses a large number of
pre-generated data files that are located in a subdirectory below this one.
If you’re using a key database or certificate store, you need to set up an ODBC data
source for this. Details are given in “Key Database Setup” on page 25.
If you’re using special encryption hardware or an external encryption device such as a
PC card, USB token, or smart card, you need to install the required device drivers on
your system, and if you’re using a generic PKCS #11 device you need to configure
the appropriate driver for it as described in “Encryption Devices and ” on page 277.
cryptlib will automatically detect and use any devices that it recognises and that have
drivers present. If you don’t enable the use of a crypto device, the self-test code will
issue a warning that no devices are present and continue without testing the crypto
device interface.
Personal firewall products from some vendors can interfere with network operations
for devices other than standard web browsers and mail clients. If you’re experiencing
odd behaviour when using cryptlib for network operations (for example you can
connect but can’t exchange data, or you get strange error messages when you
connect), you can try temporarily disabling the personal firewall to see if this fixes
the problem. If it does, you should contact the personal firewall vendor to fix their
product, or switch to a different product.
If you’re using Borland C++ rather than Visual Studio, you’ll need to set up the .def
and .lib files for use with the Borland compiler. To do this, run the following
commands in the cryptlib directory:
impdef cl32 cl32
implib cl32 cl32.def
The first one will produce a Borland-specific .def file from the DLL, the second one
will produce a Borland-specific .lib file from the DLL and .def file.
To install the ActiveX control, put the cryptlib DLL and the ActiveX wrapper
clcom.dll into the Windows system directory and register the ActiveX wrapper with:
regsvr32 clcom.dll
To use the ActiveX control with Visual Basic, use Project | Reference to add
clcom.dll, after which VB will recognise the presence of the ActiveX wrapper.
Windows CE / Pocket PC / SmartPhone / Embedded
The cryptlib DLL for Windows CE/PocketPC/SmartPhone/Embedded can be built
using the crypt32ce project file, which is for version 3 or 4 of the eMbedded Visual
C++ compiler. Once the DLL has been built, the test32ce project file will build the
cryptlib self-test program test32ce, which is a (pseudo-)console application that
produces its output on the debug console. You can run this after you’ve built cryptlib
to make sure that everything is working OK. test32ce needs to be run from the
cryptlib root directory (the one that the main data files are in) since it uses a large
number of pre-generated data files that are located in a subdirectory below this one.
24 Installation
The cryptlib Windows CE self-test uses the ‘Storage Card’ pseudo-folder to access
the files needed for the self-test. Depending on the system setup, you need to either
copy the files to the storage card or (the easier alternative) use folder sharing to
access the directory containing the test files. From the Windows CE menu, select
Folder Sharing and share the testdata subdirectory, which will appear as \\Storage
Card\ on the Windows CE device.
Windows CE is a Unicode environment, which means that all text strings are passed
to and from cryptlib as Unicode strings. For simplicity the examples in this manual
are presented using the standard char data type used on most systems, however
under Windows CE all character types and strings are Unicode in line with standard
Windows CE practice. When you’re using the examples, you should treat any
occurrence of characters and strings as standard Unicode data types.
A few older versions of eVC++ for some platforms don’t include the ANSI/ISO C
standard time.h header, which is a required file for a conforming ANSI/ISO C
compiler. If you have a version of eVC++ that doesn’t include this standard header,
you need to add it from another source, for example an eVC++ distribution that does
include it or the standard (non-embedded) VC++ distribution.
When compiling cryptlib under eVC++ 4.0 for the Arm architecture with
optimisation enabled, a compiler bug may prevent three files from compiling. If you
get an internal compiler error trying to compile context/kg_rsa.c or misc/base64.c,
you can work around the problem by disabling optimisation using #pragma
optimize( "g", off ) / #pragma optimize( "g", on ) around the functions
initCheckRSAkey() in kg_rsa.c and adjustPKIUserValue() in base64.c.
XMK
The Xilinx Microkernel (XMK) is an RTOS from Xilinx with development hosted
under Unix or Windows. You can build cryptlib for XMK using the cross-
compilation capabilities of the standard makefile, see the entry for Unix on page 21
for more details on working with the makefile. The make target for XMK is target-
xmk-mb for the MicroBlaze core and target-xmk-ppc for the PowerPC core, other
targets can be added as variations on the existing rules. Due to the wide variation of
environments and toolchains it may be necessary to modify the configuration slightly
to build the code. Details on building and using cryptlib for XMK, and on embedded
cryptlib in general, are given in “Embedded Systems” on page 314.
Other Systems
cryptlib should be fairly portable to other systems, the only part that needs special
attention is the randomness-gathering in random/os_name.c (cryptlib won’t work
without this, the code will produce a link error). The idea behind the randomness-
gathering code is to perform a comprehensive poll of every possible entropy source in
the system in a separate thread or background task (“slowPoll”), as well as providing
a less useful but much faster poll of quick-response sources (“fastPoll”). In addition
the filesystem I/O code in io/file.c may need system-specific code and definitions
added to it if the system you’re running on doesn’t use a standard form of file I/O, for
example a system that has its own file I/O layer that isn’t compatible with standard
models or one that doesn’t have file I/O at all such as an embedded device that uses
flash memory for storage.
To find out what to compile, look at the Unix makefile, which contains all of the
necessary source files (the group_name_OBJS dependencies) and compiler options.
Link all of these into a library (as the makefile does) and then compile and link the
modules in the test subdirectory with the library to create the self-test program.
There is additional assembly-language code included that will lead to noticeable
speedups on some systems, you should modify your build options as appropriate to
use these if possible.
Depending on your compiler you may get a few warnings about some of the
encryption and hashing code (one or two) and the bignum code (one or two). This
code mostly relates to the use of C as a high-level assembler and changing things
Key Database Setup 25
around to remove the warnings on one system could cause the code to break on
another system.
[testkeys]
Description = cryptlib test keyset
Driver = SQLite3
Database = /[...]/testkeys.sqlite
Timeout = 1000
^D
If you’re going to use the test certificate store you can do the same thing with the
database name “testcertstore”. Then to verify that the setup worked:
isql -m20 testkeys
You can now run the cryptlib self-test code, and it will use the SQLite database for its
certificates. After running the test code, you can display the stored certificates with:
isql -m20 testkeys
select CN, email from certificates;
unixODBC can also use the ODBCConfig GUI application to configure data sources
and drivers in a manner identical to the standard Windows interface, and also
provides the odbcinst CLI utility to configure data sources and drivers. odbcinst
can be used to automatically install and configure database drivers for ODBC using
26 Installation
template files that contain information about the driver such as the location of the
driver binaries, usually somewhere under /usr/local. For example to configure the
Oracle drivers for ODBC using a prepared template file you’d use:
odbcinst –i –d –f oracle.tmpl
iODBC provides drivers as platform-specific binaries that are installed using the
iODBC installation shell scripts. See the documentation for the particular ODBC
interface that you’re using for more information on installation and configuration
issues.
Configuration Issues
For compatibility with existing deployed code, cryptlib supports a wide variety of
encryption, signature, and hash algorithms, key types, and security mechanisms.
Some of these backwards-compatible items are obsolete, unsound, or even entirely
broken. For this reason the encryption algorithm RC4 is disabled by default. If you
want to enable these obsolete and insecure items, you can do so via the cryptlib
configuration file misc/config.h. Note that by enabling these unsafe items, you are
voiding cryptlib’s security guarantees and agree to indemnify the cryptlib authors
against any claims or losses from any problems that may arise. In other words you
really, really shouldn’t do this.
Optional cryptlib Components
cryptlib includes a number of optional facilities that provide extra functionality but
that because of the high level of complexity of the underlying code that they use and
their corresponding large attack surface, or because they are little-used in practice, are
disabled by default. If you want to use any of these facilities then you’ll need to
explicitly enable them via the cryptlib configuration build file misc/config.h, by
setting them in the makefile/project file in the standard CFLAGS variable defined at
the start of the makefile, or by specifying them using the BUILDOPTS variable for
make when you build cryptlib:
make BUILDOPTS="-DUSE_xxx -DUSE_yyy"
You should only enable these facilities if you absolutely need them and, in the case of
high-risk protocols like LDAP, are certain that the underlying subsystems that they
use are secure and robust.
Certificate Capabilities
Certificate standards bodies have, over the years, created a vast array of certificate
capabilities, most of which are ignored by implementations, and some of which
produce highly counterintuitive behaviour comprehensible only to the people who
created the standards (and sometimes not even to them). In order to reduce code size,
the complexity of the certificate-processing code, and the unexpected side-effects
caused by some of the more obscure certificate-processing requirements, cryptlib by
default provides a standard level of certificate processing that excludes the more
obscure and peculiar portions of PKI standards. This corresponds to CRYPT_-
COMPLIANCELEVEL_STANDARD as discussed in “Certificate Compliance Level
Checking” on page 213.
If you want to enable processing of obscure certificate attributes and handling of
peculiar processing requirements you can change the level of processing that cryptlib
applies to certificates. Defining USE_CERTLEVEL_PKIX_PARTIAL either via the
makefile/project file or in misc/config.h sets the certificate-processing level to
CRYPT_COMPLIANCELEVEL_PKIX_PARTIAL, and defining
USE_CERTLEVEL_PKIX_FULKL sets the certificate-processing level to
CRYPT_COMPLIANCELEVEL_PKIX_FULL. Note that these extended certificate-
processing levels significantly increase the certificate-handling code size and
complexity and processing requirements, with little obvious benefit since few
implementations ever use this level of certificate detail.
Configuration Issues 27
DNS SRV
The DNS SRV facility is used to implement the automatic PKI server detection
facility for cryptlib’s plug-and-play PKI facility (this is an optional capability that can
be used if it’s not possible to configure a PKI server name as part of the standard
initialisation process, and isn’t otherwise required for plug-and-play PKI). The
underlying DNS management (particularly under Unix, where the interface is quite
primitive) is complex and has a potentially large attack surface, so it’s disabled by
default. If you’re certain that you really need DNS SRV access then you can enable it
by defining USE_DNSSRV.
EAP / RADIUS
EAP /RADIUS is an additional protocol that can be run with SSL/TLS. If you want
to use EAP with cryptlib, you can enable its use by defining USE_EAP.
LDAP
LDAP is an extraordinarily complex protocol (the “L” in its name is deceptive
advertising, it should be called HDAP) with a very large attack surface, so it’s
disabled by default. If you’re certain that you really need LDAP access then you can
enable it by defining USE_LDAP.
SSH Subsystems
The SSH protocol provides a Swiss-army-knife set of mechanisms covering a range
of special-purpose facilities like port forwarding, connection multiplexing, custom
subsystems, and even user-defined channel types. These facilities are extremely
complex and open to abuse by attackers, and are disabled by default. The standard
cryptlib configuration supports straightforward encrypted-tunnel SSH sessions, which
is what most people use SSH for. If you’re certain that you really need the various
SSH extended facilities like port forwarding, connection multiplexing, and
subsystems, then you can enable them by defining USE_SSH_EXTENDED.
WebSockets
WebSockets are an additional protocol that can be run with SSL/TLS. If you want to
use WebSockets with cryptlib, you can enable their use by defining USE_WEBSOCKETS.
X.500 DNs in string form
cryptlib supports the ability to specify X.500 Distinguished Names for certificates as
free-format strings, allowing the creation of arbitrarily complex and non-standard
DNs. This is a somewhat dangerous capability both because it allows the creation of
arbitrarily awkward and broken DNs, and because it bypasses cryptlib’s standard
safety checks for DN validity, so it’s disabled by default. If you’re certain that you
really need X.500 free-format string access then you can enable it by defining
USE_CERT_DNSTRING.
Profile Description
CONFIG_PROFILE_SMIME Enable only the capabilities needed for
S/MIME envelopes.
CONFIG_PROFILE_PGP Enable only the capabilities needed for
PGP envelopes.
CONFIG_PROFILE_SSH Enable only the capabilities needed for
SSH sessions.
CONFIG_PROFILE_TLS Enable only the capabilities needed for
SSL/TLS sessions.
Note that these predefined profiles will enable only the functionality that you need for
the particular application and no more. For example SSH doesn’t use X.509
certificates so CONFIG_PROFILE_SSH won’t enable the use of certificates, if
you’re using a keyset to store an SSH server’s private (and public) key then you need
to store the public portion as a raw public key rather than a public-key certificate
because the latter can’t be processed by the SSH-only profile.
Custom Cryptographic HALs
Alongside the built-in software- and hardware-based cryptography, it’s also possible
to use a custom crypto HAL with cryptlib that substitutes non-public algorithms for
the standard ones used by cryptlib. This is different to the use of cryptographic
hardware devices described in “Encryption Devices and Encryption Hardware” on
page 277 in that the crypto HAL takes over all cryptographic operations performed by
cryptlib.
The use of custom crypto HALs is controlled by two defines, CONFIG_CRYPTO_HW1
and CONFIG_CRYPTO_HW2 that you can define either via the makefile/project file or in
misc/config.h. Defining CONFIG_CRYPTO_HW1 replaces all of the crypto algorithms
with custom ones that you need to provide via the interface defined in
device/hw_template.c, while defining CONFIG_CRYPTO_HW2 replaces the algorithms
and higher-level crypto mechanisms such as PKCS #1 signing and encryption with
custom ones that you need to provide. Using a custom crypto HAL requires working
with the internals of cryptlib, please contact the cryptlib developers if you intend to
do this.
Note that using a custom crypto HAL can affect the operation of some public-key
algorithms implemented in crypto devices like PKCS #11 tokens, since cryptlib relies
on the presence of native public-key operations to supplement what’s implemented by
the PKCS #11 token. In particular the DH/DSA and ECDH/ECDSA algorithms as
implemented in PKCS #11 don’t provide full key generation/key load support, so
cryptlib implements the missing portions in native code. If you disable the native
code by switching to a custom crypto HAL and your HAL doesn’t implement support
for the DH/DSA or ECDH/ECDSA operations needed by PKCS #11 then attempting
to use those algorithms in a PKCS #11 token will fail with a CRYPT_ERROR_-
NOTAVAIL error even if the token otherwise appears to support the algorithm.
Debug vs. Release Versions of cryptlib
cryptlib can be built in one of two forms, a debug version and a release version. The
main difference between the two is that the release version is built with the NDEBUG
value defined, which disables the large number of internal consistency checks that are
present in the debug build of cryptlib. These consistency checks are used to catch
conditions such as inappropriate error codes being returned from internal functions,
invalid data values being passed to functions inside cryptlib, configuration errors, and
general sanity checks that ensure that everything is operating as it should. If one of
these internal checks is triggered, cryptlib will throw an exception and display an
error message indicating that an assertion in the code has failed. These assertions are
useful for tracking down areas of code that may need revision in later releases.
Configuration Issues 29
If you don’t want to see these diagnostic messages, you should build cryptlib with the
NDEBUG value defined (this is the default under Unix and is done automatically
under Windows when you build a release version of the code with Visual Studio).
Building a version in this manner will disable the extra consistency checks that are
present in the debug version so that, for example, error conditions will be indicated
by cryptlib returning an error code for a function call rather than throwing an
exception. This will have the slight downside that it’ll make tracking the exact
location of a problem a bit more complex, since the error code which is returned
probably won’t be checked until the flow of execution has progressed a long way
from where the problem was detected. On the other hand the release version of the
code is significantly smaller than the debug version.
As always, if you’re working with a debug build of the code and perform an
operation that triggers an internal consistency check you should report the details and
the code necessary to recreate it to the cryptlib developers in order to allow the
exception condition to be analysed and corrected.
cryptlib Version Information
cryptlib uses 3-digit version numbers, available at runtime through the configuration
options CRYPT_OPTION_INFO_MAJORVERSION, CRYPT_OPTION_INFO_-
MINORVERSION, and CRYPT_OPTION_INFO_STEPPING, and at compile time
through the define CRYPTLIB_VERSION. CRYPTLIB_VERSION contains the
current version as a 3-digit decimal value with the first digit being the major version
number (currently 3), the second digit being the minor version number, and the third
digit being the update or stepping number. For example, cryptlib version 3.2.1 would
have a CRYPTLIB_VERSION value of 321.
All cryptlib releases with the same stepping version number are binary-compatible.
This means that if you move from (for example) cryptlib version 3.2.1 to 3.2.2, all
you need to do is replace the cryptlib DLL or shared library to take advantage of new
cryptlib features and updates. All cryptlib releases with the same minor version
number are source-compatible, so that if you move from (for example) 3.2.1 to 3.3.5,
you need to recompile your application to match new features in cryptlib.
cryptlib and Cloud Computing
Cloud computing is fundamentally incompatible with secure crypto operations. If
you’re running your crypto on someone else’s computer then you have no way of
telling what they’re doing with your crypto or your keys. By extension if you’re
running your crypto on a platform that’s shared with hostile processes that can access
information like CPU statistics and cache information then you can’t guarantee the
safety of your crypto keys. Although cryptlib employs countermeasures to try and
reduce the threat, it’s not possible to guarantee the safety of your crypto or keys when
they’re exposed on someone else’s hardware or to someone else’s software (the same
applies to anyone else’s crypto in such an environment, at best you can try and
obscure or hide your crypto operations and keys and hope that no-one figures out how
to get at them). In other words if you’re running your crypto in a cloud or shared
computing environment then your security guarantees are void.
Similarly, if you allow someone to probe the system that you’re running cryptlib on
with measuring equipment that can analyse internal electrical or similar signals then
your security guarantees are void. As with the cloud/shared computing problem, this
issue isn’t specific to cryptlib but affects all crypto implementations, no matter what
their salespeople may tell you.
The solution to these issues is simple, don’t run your sensitive crypto operations on
systems controlled by others or that allow hostile code to run alongside, and attack,
your crypto code, and don’t allow them to probe your systems with measuring
equipment to capture its internal operations.
30 Installation
cryptlib Basics
cryptlib works with two classes of objects, container objects and action objects. A
container object is an object that contains one or more items such as data, keys or
certificates. An action object is an object which is used to perform an action such as
encrypting or signing data. The container types used in cryptlib are envelopes (for
data), sessions (for communications sessions), keysets (for keys), and certificates (for
attributes such as key usage restrictions and signature information). Container
objects can have items such as data or public/private keys placed in them and
retrieved from them. In addition to containing data or keys, container objects can
also contain other objects that affect the behaviour of the container object. For
example pushing an encryption object into an envelope container object will result in
all data which is pushed into the envelope being encrypted or decrypted using the
encryption object.
Encryption contexts are the action objects used by cryptlib. Action objects are used
to act on data, for example to encrypt or decrypt a piece of data or to digitally sign or
check the signature on a piece of data.
The usual mechanism for processing data is to use an envelope or session container
object. The process of pushing data into an envelope and popping the processed data
back out is known as enveloping the data. The reverse process is known as de-
enveloping the data. Session objects work in a similar manner, but are used to
encapsulate a secure session with a remote client or server rather than a local data
transformation. The first section of this manual covers the basics of enveloping data,
which introduces the enveloping mechanism and covers various aspects of the
enveloping process such as processing data streams of unknown length and handling
errors. Once you have the code to perform basic enveloping in place, you can add
extra functionality such as password-based data encryption to the processing. After
the basic concepts behind enveloping have been explained, more advanced techniques
such as public-key based enveloping and digital signature enveloping for S/MIME
and PGP are covered.
Session objects are very similar to envelope objects except that they represent a
communications session with a remote client or server. The next section covers the
use of session objects for protocols such as SSL, TLS, and SSH to secure
communications or work with protocols such as CMS, SCEP, RTCS, OCSP, SCVP,
and TSP that handle functions such as certificate status information and
timestamping.
The use of public keys for enveloping requires the use of key management functions,
and the next section covers key generation and storing and retrieving keys from
keyset objects and crypto devices. The public portions of public/private key pairs are
typically managed using X.509 certificates and certificate revocation lists. The next
sections cover the management of certificates including certificate issue, certificate
status checking, and certificate revocation list (CRL) creation and checking, as well
as the full CA management process. This covers the full key life cycle from creation
through certification to revocation and/or destruction.
So far all of the objects that have been covered are high-level container objects. The
next section covers the creation of low-level action objects that you can either push
into a container object or apply directly to data, including the various ways of loading
or generating keys into them. The next sections explain how to apply the action
objects to data and cover the process of encryption, key exchange, and signature
generation and verification, working at a much lower level than the enveloping or
session interface.
The next sections cover certificates and certificate-like objects in more detail than the
earlier ones, covering such topics as DN structures, certificate chains, trust
management, and certificate extensions. This deals with certificates at a very low
level at which they’re rather harder to manage than with the high-level certificate
management functions.
32 cryptlib Basics
The next section covers the use of encryption devices such as smart cards, crypto
devices, HSMs, and Fortezza cards, and explains how to use them to perform many of
the tasks covered in previous sections. Finally, the last sections cover miscellaneous
topics such as random number management, the cryptlib configuration database, key
database and network plugins, and use in embedded systems.
Programming Interfaces
cryptlib provides three levels of interface, of which the highest-level one is the easiest
to use and therefore the recommended one. At this level cryptlib works with
envelope and session container objects, an abstract object into which you can insert
and remove data which is processed as required while it is in the object. Using
envelopes and session objects requires no knowledge of encryption or digital
signature techniques. At an intermediate level, cryptlib works with encryption action
objects, and requires some knowledge of encryption techniques. In addition you will
need to handle some of the management of the encryption objects yourself. At the
very lowest level cryptlib works directly with the encryption action objects and
requires you to know about algorithm details and key and data management methods.
Before you begin you should decide which interface you want to use, as each one has
its own distinct advantages and disadvantages. The three interfaces are:
High-level Interface
This interface requires no knowledge of encryption and digital signature techniques,
and is easiest for use with languages like Visual Basic and Java that don’t interface to
C data structures very well. The container object interface provides services to create
and destroy envelopes and secure sessions, to add security attributes such as
encryption information and signature keys to a container object, and to move data
into and out of a container. Because of its simplicity and ease of use, it’s strongly
recommended that you use this interface if at all possible.
Mid-level Interface
This interface requires some knowledge of encryption and digital signature
techniques. Because it handles encoding of things like session keys and digital
signatures but not of the data itself, it’s better suited for applications that require high-
speed data encryption, or encryption of many small data packets (such as an
encrypted terminal session). The mid-level interface provides services such as
routines to export and import encrypted keys and to create and check digital
signatures. The high-level interface is built on top of this interface.
Low-level Interface
This interface requires quite a bit of knowledge of encryption and digital signature
techniques. It provides a direct interface to the raw encryption capabilities of
cryptlib. The only reason for using these low-level routines is if you need them as
building blocks for your own custom encryption protocol. Note though that cryptlib
is designed to benefit the application of encryption in standard protocols and not the
raw use of crypto in home-made protocols. Getting such security protocols right is
very difficult, with many “obvious” and “simple” approaches being quite vulnerable
to attack. This is why cryptlib encourages the use of vetted security protocols, and
does not encourage roll-your-own security mechanisms. In particular if you don’t
know what PKCS #1 padding is, what CBC does, or why you need an IV, you
shouldn’t be using this interface.
The low-level interface serves as an interface to a range of plug-in encryption
modules that allow encryption algorithms to be added in a fairly transparent manner,
with a standardised interface allowing any of the algorithms and modes supported by
cryptlib to be used with a minimum of coding effort. As such the main function of
the action object interface is to provide a standard, portable interface between the
underlying encryption routines and the user software. The mid-level interface is built
on top of this interface.
Objects and Interfaces 33
Type Description
CRYPT_SESSINFO_name Session attributes.
Some of the attributes apply only to a particular object type but others may apply
across multiple objects. For example a certificate contains a public key, so the key
size attribute, which is normally associated with a context, would also apply to a
certificate. To determine the key size for the key in a certificate, you would read its
key size attribute as if it were an encryption context.
Attribute data is either a single numeric value or variable-length data consisting of a
(data, length) pair. Numeric attribute values are used for objects, boolean values and
integers. Variable-length data attribute values are used for text strings, binary data
blobs, and representations of time using the ANSI/ISO standard seconds-since-1970
format.
Randomness polls are described in more detail in “Random Numbers” on page 292.
The randomness poll executes asynchronously, so it won’t stall the rest of your code
while it’s running. The one possible exception to this polling on start-up is when
you’re using cryptlib as part of a larger application where you’re not certain that
cryptlib will actually be used. For example a PHP script that’s run repeatedly from
the command line may only use the encryption functionality on rare occasions (or not
at all), so that it’s better to perform the slow poll only when it’s actually needed rather
than unconditionally every time the script is invoked. This is a somewhat special
Interfacing with cryptlib 35
case though, and normally it’s better practice to always perform the slow poll on
start-up.
As the text above mentioned, you should initialise cryptlib when your program first
starts and shut it down when your program is about to exit, rather than repeatedly
starting cryptlib up and shutting it down again each time you use it. Since cryptlib
consists of a complete crypto operating system with extensive initialisation, internal
security self-tests, and full resource management, repeatedly starting and stopping it
will unnecessarily consume resources such as processor time during each
initialisation and shutdown. It can also tie up host operating system resources if the
host contains subsystems that leak memory or handles (under Windows, ODBC and
LDAP are particularly bad, with ODBC leaking memory and LDAP leaking handles.
DNS is also rather leaky — this is one of the reasons why programs like web
browsers and FTP clients consume memory and handles without bounds). To avoid
this problem, you should avoid repeatedly starting up and shutting down cryptlib:
Right Wrong
cryptInit(); serverLoop:
serverLoop: cryptInit();
process data; process data;
cryptEnd(); cryptEnd();
C / C++
To use cryptlib from C or C++ you would use:
#include "cryptlib.h"
cryptInit();
cryptEnd();
C# / .NET
To use cryptlib from C# / .NET, add cryptlib.cs to your .NET project and the cryptlib
DLL to your path, and then use:
using cryptlib;
crypt.Init();
crypt.End();
If you’re using a .NET language other than C# (for example VB.NET), you’ll need to
build cryptlib.cs as a class library first. From Visual Studio, create a new C# project
of type Class Library, add cryptlib.cs to it, and compile it to create a DLL. Now go
to your VB project and add the DLL as a Reference. The cryptlib classes and
methods will be available natively using VB (or whatever .NET language you’re
using).
All cryptlib functions are placed in the crypt class, so that standard cryptlib
functions like:
cryptSetAttribute( cryptContext, CRYPT_CTXINFO_KEYSIZE, 1024 / 8 );
become:
crypt.SetAttribute( cryptContext, crypt.CTXINFO_KEYSIZE, 1024 / 8 );
In general when calling cryptlib functions you can use Strings wherever the cryptlib
interface requires a null-terminated C string, and byte arrays wherever the cryptlib
interface requires binary data.
Instead of returning a status value like the native C interface, the .NET version throws
CryptException for error status returns, and returns integer or string data return
values as the return value:
36 cryptlib Basics
Delphi
To use cryptlib from Delphi, add the cryptlib DLL to your path and then use:
implementation
uses cryptlib;
cryptInit;
cryptEnd;
end;
The Delphi interface to cryptlib is otherwise mostly identical to the standard C/C++
one.
Java
To use cryptlib with Java, put cryptlib.jar on your classpath and use System.-
LoadLibrary() to load the cryptlib shared library. You can then use:
import cryptlib.*;
class Cryptlib
{
public static void main( String[] args )
{
System.loadLibrary( "cl" ); // cryptlib library name
try
{
crypt.Init();
crypt.End();
}
catch( CryptException e )
{
// cryptlib returned an error
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
};
All cryptlib functions are placed in the crypt class, so that standard cryptlib
functions like:
cryptSetAttribute( cryptContext, CRYPT_CTXINFO_KEYSIZE, 1024 / 8 );
become:
crypt.SetAttribute( cryptContext, crypt.CTXINFO_KEYSIZE, 1024 / 8 );
In general when calling cryptlib functions you can use Java strings wherever the
cryptlib interface requires a null-terminated C string, and Java byte arrays wherever
the cryptlib interface requires binary data. In addition as of JDK 1.4 there is a
nio.ByteBuffer class that can be “direct”, which provides a more efficient
alternative to standard byte arrays since there’s no need to perform any copying.
Instead of returning a status value like the native C interface, the JNI version throws
CryptException for error status returns, and returns integer or string data return
values as the return value:
value = crypt.GetAttribute( cryptContext, crypt.CTXINFO_ALGO );
stringValue = crypt.GetAttributeString( cryptContext,
crypt.CTXINFO_ALGO_NAME );
Interfacing with cryptlib 37
Python
To build the Python interface to cryptlib, change to the bindings directory and run
python setup.py install. This will build and install the python.c extension
module. In order to do this you’ll need to have the Python source code installed. If
you get an error like Python.h: No such file or directory (followed by a
cascade of other errors) then you need to install the Python source in order to build
the cryptlib interface. On a Unix platform you may need to create a symlink from cl
to the actual shared library before you do this. Once you’ve done this you can use:
from cryptlib_py import *
cryptInit()
cryptEnd()
Starting with Python 3.10, integer handles to cryptlib objects are treated as different
types when the object is created and when it’s subsequently used. This means that
after creating an object you need to cast its integer handle to an integer, so instead of:
hashContext = cryptCreateContext( cryptUser, CRYPT_ALGO_SHA2 )
algoNameSize = cryptGetAttributeString( hashContext,
CRYPT_CTXINFO_NAME_ALGO, algoName )
Tcl
To use cryptlib from Tcl, you use the Cryptkit extension. Cryptkit is a stubs-enabled
extension that can be used with any modern Tcl interpreter (at least, Tcl 8.4 or later).
To build Cryptkit you’ll need a copy of Tcl that can interpret Starkits, either Tclkit,
the single file Tcl/Tk executable available from http://www.equi4.com/pub/tk, or
ActiveTcl from http://www.activestate.com. You’ll also need to download the
Critcl Starkit from http://mini.net/sdarchive/critcl.kit, and make sure that
the current directory contains cryptlib.h and a copy of the cryptlib static library,
named libcl_$platfom.a, where $platform is the current platform name as provided
by the Critcl platform command. For example under x86 Linux the library would be
called libcl_Linux-x86.a. Then run the following Critcl command:
critcl -pkg cryptkit
This will leave you with a lib directory containing the information ready for use in
any Tcl application. Once you’ve done this you can use:
package require Cryptkit
cryptInit
cryptEnd
Since Tcl objects already contain length information, there’s no need to pass length
parameters to cryptlib function calls. This applies for the AddCertExtension,
CheckSignature, CheckSignatureEx, CreateSignature, CreateSignatureEx, Decrypt,
Encrypt, ExportCert, ExportKey, ExportKeyEx, GetCertExtension, ImportKey,
PushData, and SetAttributeString functions.
Visual Basic
To use cryptlib from Visual Basic you would use:
' Add cryptlib.bas to your project
cryptInit
38 cryptlib Basics
cryptEnd
The Visual Basic interface to cryptlib is otherwise mostly identical to the standard
C/C++ one.
Return Codes
Every cryptlib function returns a status code to tell you whether it succeeded or
failed. If a function executes successfully, it returns CRYPT_OK. If it fails, it
returns one of the status values detailed in “Error Handling” on page 295. The
sample code used in this manual omits the checking of status values for clarity, but
when using cryptlib you should check return values, particularly for critical functions
such as any that perform active crypto operations like processing data in envelopes,
activating and using secure sessions, signing and checking certificates, and
encryption and signing in general.
The previous initialisation code, rewritten to include checking for returned status
values, is:
int status;
status = cryptInit();
if( status != CRYPT_OK )
/* cryptlib initialisation failed */;
status = cryptEnd();
if( status != CRYPT_OK )
/* cryptlib shutdown failed */;
crypt.End();
}
catch( CryptException e )
{
int status = e.Status;
String message = e.Message;
}
crypt.End();
}
catch( CryptException e )
{
int status = e.getStatus();
String message = e.getMessage();
}
In Python the exception value is a tuple containing the status code, then the message:
try:
cryptInit()
cryptEnd()
except CryptException, e:
status, message = e
Working with Object Attributes 39
This leads to a small problem: How do you know how big to make the buffer? The
answer is to use cryptGetAttributeString to tell you. If you pass in a null pointer
for the data value, the function will set the length value to the size of the data, but not
do anything else. You can then use code like:
char *emailAddress;
int emailAddressLength;
to obtain the data value. In most cases this two-step process isn’t necessary, the
standards that cryptlib conforms to generally place limits on the size of most
attributes so that cryptlib will never return more data than the fixed limit. For
example most strings in certificates are limited to a maximum length set by the
CRYPT_MAX_TEXTSIZE constant. More information on these sizes is given with
the descriptions of the different attributes.
The Visual Basic version is:
Dim emailAddress as String
Dim emailAddressLength as Integer
The shortcut syntax allows you to get/set attributes as if they were integer and string
members of the object (without the CRYPT_ prefix):
cryptEnvelope.ENVINFO_PASSWORD = "1234"
emailAddress = cryptCertificate.CERTINFO_RFC822NAME
Just as with Python, C# and Java also migrate returned data to return values. In the
C# and Java cases the string functions take byte arrays or Strings. When passing a
byte array, you can optionally specify an offset following it for
cryptGetAttributeString and an offset and length following it for
cryptSetAttributeString. There is also a special version of
cryptGetAttributeString that returns Strings for convenience:
crypt.SetAttributeString( cryptEnvelope, crypt.ENVINFO_PASSWORD,
"1234" );
String emailAddress = crypt.GetAttributeString( cryptCertificate,
crypt.CERTINFO_RFC822NAME );
Finally, cryptDeleteAttribute lets you delete an attribute in the cases where that’s
possible:
cryptDeleteAttribute( cryptCertificate, CRYPT_CERTINFO_VALIDFROM );
All access to objects and object attributes is enforced by cryptlib’s security kernel. If
you try to access or manipulate an attribute in a manner that isn’t allowed (for
example by trying to read a write-only attribute, trying to assign a string value to a
numeric attribute, trying to delete an attribute that can’t be deleted, trying to set a
certificate-specific attribute for an envelope, or some similar action) cryptlib will
return an error code to tell you that this type of access is invalid. If there’s a problem
with the object that you’re trying to manipulate, cryptlib will return CRYPT_-
ERROR_PARAM1 to tell you that the object handle parameter passed to the function
is invalid. If there’s a problem with the attribute type (typically because it’s invalid
for this object type) cryptlib will return CRYPT_ERROR_PARAM2. If there’s a
problem with the attribute value, cryptlib will return CRYPT_ERROR_PARAM3,
and if there’s a problem with the length (for the functions that take a length
parameter) cryptlib will return CRYPT_ERROR_PARAM4. If you try to perform an
attribute access which is disallowed (reading an attribute that can’t be read, writing to
or deleting a read-only attribute, or something similar) cryptlib will return
CRYPT_ERROR_PERMISSION.
Finally, if you try to access an attribute that hasn’t been initialised or isn’t present,
cryptlib will return CRYPT_ERROR_NOTINITED or CRYPT_ERROR_-
NOTFOUND, the only real distinction between the two is that the former is typically
returned for fixed attributes that haven’t had a value assigned to them yet while the
latter is returned for optional attributes that aren’t present in the object.
Attribute Types
Attribute values can be boolean or numeric values, cryptlib objects, time values, text
strings, or binary data:
Type Description
Binary A binary data string that can contain almost anything. Get and
set these with cryptGetAttributeString and
cryptSetAttributeString.
Boolean Flags that can be set to ‘true’ (any nonzero value) or ‘false’ (a
zero value), and control whether a certain option or operation
is enabled or not. For example the CRYPT_CERTINFO_CA
Working with Object Attributes 41
Type Description
attribute in a certificate controls whether a certificate is
marked as being a CA certificate or not. Note that cryptlib
uses the value 1 to represent ‘true’, some languages may
represent this by the value –1. Get and set these with
cryptGetAttribute and cryptSetAttribute.
Numeric A numeric constant such as an integer value or a bitflag. For
example the CRYPT_CTXINFO_KEYSIZE attribute specifies
the size of a key (in bytes) and the CRYPT_CERTINFO_-
CRLREASON attribute specifies a numeric reason code that
indicates why a CRL was issued. Get and set these with
cryptGetAttribute and cryptSetAttribute.
Object A handle to a cryptlib object. For example the CRYPT_-
CERTINFO_SUBJECTPUBLICKEYINFO attribute specifies
the public key to be added to a certificate. Get and set these
with cryptGetAttribute and cryptSetAttribute.
String A text string that contains information such as a name,
message, email address, or URL. Strings are encoded using
the standard system local character set, usually ASCII or
latin-1 or UTF-8 (depending on the system), however under
Windows CE, which is a Unicode environment, these are
Unicode strings. In (very rare) cases where the standard
system character set doesn’t support the characters used in the
string (for example when encoding Asian characters), the
characters used will be Unicode or widechars. For all intents
and purposes you can assume that all strings are encoded in
the standard character set that you’d normally use, cryptlib
will perform all conversions for you.
An example string attribute is CRYPT_CTXINFO_LABEL,
which contains a human-readable label used to identify private
keys.
The most frequently used text string components are those that
make up a certificate’s distinguished name, which identifies
the certificate owner. Most of these components are limited to
a maximum of 64 characters by the X.500 standard that covers
certificates and their components, and cryptlib provides the
CRYPT_MAX_TEXTSIZE constant for use with these
components (this value is also used for most other strings such
as key labels). Since this value is specified in characters rather
than bytes, Unicode strings can be several times as long as this
value when their length is expressed in bytes, depending on
which data type the system uses to represent Unicode
characters. Get and set these with cryptGetAttributeString
and cryptSetAttributeString.
Time The ANSI/ISO C standard time value containing the local time
expressed as seconds since 1970. This is a binary (rather than
numeric) field, with the data being the time value (in C and
C++ this is a time_t, usually a signed long integer).
Due to the vagaries of international time zones and daylight
savings time adjustments, it isn’t possible to accurately
compare two local times from different time zones, or made
across a DST switch (consider for example a country
switching to DST, which has two 2am times while another
country only has one). Because of this ambiguity, times read
from objects such as certificates may appear to be out by an
hour or two. Get and set these with cryptGetAttributeString
42 cryptlib Basics
Type Description
and cryptSetAttributeString.
Since most text strings have a fixed maximum length, you can use code like:
char commonName[ CRYPT_MAX_TEXTSIZE + 1 ];
int commonNameLength;
to read the value, in this case the common name of a certificate owner.
Note the explicit addition of the terminating null character, since the strings returned
aren’t null-terminated. You also need to be careful about the content of the strings, in
some cases they can contain binary data that can’t be displayed as text.
In Visual Basic this is:
Dim commonName As String
Dim commonNameLength As Long
The description above assumes that the common name is expressed in a single-byte
character set. Since the values passed to cryptGetAttributeString and
cryptSetAttributeString are untyped, their length is given in bytes and not in
characters (which may not be byte-sized). For Unicode strings, you need to multiply
the size of the buffer by the size of a Unicode character on your system to get the
actual size to pass to the function, or divide by the size of a Unicode character to get
the number of characters returned. For example to perform the same operation as
above in a Unicode environment you’d use:
wchar_t commonName[ CRYPT_MAX_TEXTSIZE + 1 ];
int commonNameLength;
Object
Group Attr
Envelope
Sig. Time-
Signature Key
Info stamp
Signature Key
Sig.
Signature Key
Info
In order to navigate across attribute groups, and across attributes within a group,
cryptlib provides the attribute cursor functionality described in the section that
follows. As well as moving the cursor back and forth across attribute groups and
attributes within the group, you can also position it directly on a group or attribute. In
the common case where only a single attribute group is present, for example an
envelope object that contains a single signature or a session object that contains user
information for a single user:
Signature Signature
Envelope
Key Info
you can treat the attributes as a single flat list of attributes and not worry about the
hierarchical arrangement into groups.
Attribute Cursor Management
You can move the attribute cursor by setting an attribute that tells cryptlib where to
move it to. This attribute, either CRYPT_ATTRIBUTE_CURRENT_GROUP when
moving by attribute group or CRYPT_ATTRIBUTE_CURRENT when moving by
attribute within the current group, takes as value a cursor movement code that moves
the cursor either to an absolute position (the first or last group or attribute in the list)
or relative to its current position. The movement codes are:
Code Description
CRYPT_CURSOR_FIRST Move the cursor to the first group or attribute.
CRYPT_CURSOR_LAST Move the cursor to the last group or attribute.
CRYPT_CURSOR_NEXT Move the cursor to the next group or attribute.
CRYPT_CURSOR_PREV Move the cursor to the previous group or
attribute.
44 cryptlib Basics
Object
Group Attr
CRYPT_ATTRIBUTE_CURRENT_GROUP
CRYPT_ATTRIBUTE_CURRENT
To advance the cursor to the start of the next group you would use:
cryptSetAttribute( cryptCertificate, CRYPT_ATTRIBUTE_CURRENT_GROUP,
CRYPT_CURSOR_NEXT );
To advance the cursor to the next attribute in the current group you would use:
cryptSetAttribute( cryptCertificate, CRYPT_ATTRIBUTE_CURRENT,
CRYPT_CURSOR_NEXT );
In some cases multiple instances of the same attribute can be present, in which case
you can use a third level of cursor movement, handled via the CRYPT_-
ATTRIBUTE_CURRENT_INSTANCE attribute, and relative cursor movement to
step through the different instances of the attribute. Since the use of multi-valued
attributes is rare, it’s safe to assume one value per attribute in most cases, so that
stepping through multiple attribute instances is usually unnecessary.
Once you’ve set the cursor position you can work with the attribute group or attribute
at that position in the usual manner. To obtain the group or attribute type at the
current position you would use:
CRYPT_ATTRIBUTE_TYPE groupID;
This example obtains the attribute group type, to obtain the attribute type you would
substitute CRYPT_ATTRIBUTE_CURRENT in place of CRYPT_ATTRIBUTE_-
CURRENT_GROUP. Attribute accesses are relative to the currently selected group,
so for example if you move the cursor in an envelope to a signature attribute group
and then read the signature key/certificate or signing time, it’ll be the one for the
currently-selected signature attribute group. Since there can be multiple signatures
present in an envelope, you can use this mechanism to read the signing information
for each of the ones that are present.
To delete the attribute group at the current cursor position you would use:
cryptDeleteAttribute( cryptCertificate,
CRYPT_ATTRIBUTE_CURRENT_GROUP );
Working with Object Attributes 45
Deleting the attribute group at the cursor position will move the cursor to the start of
the group that follows the deleted one, or to the start of the previous group if the one
being deleted was the last one present. This means that you can delete every attribute
group simply by repeatedly deleting the one under the cursor.
The attribute cursor provides a convenient mechanism for stepping through every
attribute group and attribute which is present in an object. For example to iterate
through every attribute group you would use:
if( cryptSetAttribute( cryptCertificate,
CRYPT_ATTRIBUTE_CURRENT_GROUP, CRYPT_CURSOR_FIRST ) == CRYPT_OK )
do
{
CRYPT_ATTRIBUTE_TYPE groupID;
If cryptSetAttribute( cryptCertificate, _
CRYPT_ATTRIBUTE_CURRENT_GROUP, CRYPT_CURSOR_FIRST ) == CRYPT_OK
Then
Do
' Get the type of the attribute group under the cursor
cryptGetAttribute cryptCertificate, CRYPT_ATTRIBUTE_CURRENT, _
groupID
To extend this a stage further and iterate through every attribute in every group in the
object you would use:
if( cryptSetAttribute( cryptCertificate,
CRYPT_ATTRIBUTE_CURRENT_GROUP, CRYPT_CURSOR_FIRST ) == CRYPT_OK )
do
{
do
{
CRYPT_ATTRIBUTE_TYPE attributeID;
Note that iterating attribute by attribute works within the current attribute group, but
as mentioned earlier won’t jump from one group to the next — to do that, you need to
iterate by group.
46 cryptlib Basics
You can also position the attribute cursor directly by telling cryptlib which attribute
you want to move the cursor to. For example to move the cursor in a certificate
object to the extended key usage attribute group you would use:
cryptSetAttribute( cryptCertificate, CRYPT_ATTRIBUTE_CURRENT_GROUP,
CRYPT_CERTINFO_EXTKEYUSAGE );
For certificate objects you can also use this cursor-positioning mechanism to select
the certificate’s subject and issuer names, which aren’t part of the standard attributes
but are complex enough that they’re processed like attributes. For example to select
the certificate’s issuer name you would use:
cryptSetAttribute( cryptCertificate,
CRYPT_ATTRIBUTE_CURRENT_ATTRIBUTE, CRYPT_CERTINFO_SUBJECTNAME );
Usually the absolute cursor-positioning capability is only useful for certificate objects
where you know that certain attributes will be present and that only one instance of
the attribute will be present. For envelope and session objects you generally can’t tell
in advance which attributes will be present and it’s quite possible that multiple
attribute instances (such as multiple signatures on a envelope) will be present. In this
case selecting an attribute will only select the first one that’s present, so it’s better to
use the attribute cursor to walk the list to see what’s there.
Using this absolute cursor positioning in a variation of the attribute enumeration
operation given earlier, you can enumerate only the attributes of a single attribute
group (rather than all groups) by first selecting the group and then stepping through
the attributes in it. For example to read all of a certificate’s extended key usage types
you would use:
if( cryptSetAttribute( cryptCertificate,
CRYPT_ATTRIBUTE_CURRENT_GROUP, CRYPT_CERTINFO_EXTKEYUSAGE ) ==
CRYPT_OK )
do
{
CRYPT_ATTRIBUTE_TYPE attributeID;
Object Security
Each cryptlib object has its own security settings that affect the way that you can use
the object. You can set these attributes, identified by CRYPT_PROPERTY_name,
after you create an object to provide enhanced control over how it’s used. For
example on a system that supports threads you can bind an object to an individual
thread within a process so that only the thread that owns the object can see it. For any
other thread in the process, the object handle is invalid.
You can get and set an object’s properties using cryptGetAttribute and
cryptSetAttribute, passing as arguments the object whose property attribute you
want to change, the type of property attribute to change, and the attribute value or a
pointer to a location to receive the attribute’s value. The object property attributes
that you can get or set are:
Property/Description Type
CRYPT_PROPERTY_FORWARDCOUNT Numeric
The number of times an object can be forwarded (that is, the number of
times the ownership of the object can be changed). Each time the object’s
ownership is changed, the forwarding count decreases by one; once it
reaches zero, the object can’t be forwarded any further. For example if you
set this attribute’s value to 1 then you can forward the object to another
thread, but that thread can’t forward it further.
After you set this attribute (and any other security-related attributes), you
should set the CRYPT_PROPERTY_LOCKED attribute to ensure that it
Object Security 47
Property/Description Type
can’t be changed later.
CRYPT_PROPERTY_HIGHSECURITY Boolean
This is a composite value that sets all general security-related attributes to
their highest security setting. Setting this value will make an object owned,
non-exportable (if appropriate), non-forwardable, and locked. Since this is a
composite value representing a number of separate attributes, its value can’t
be read or unset after being set.
CRYPT_PROPERTY_LOCKED Boolean
Locks the security-related object attributes so that they can no longer be
changed. You should set this attribute once you’ve set other security-related
attributes such as CRYPT_PROPERTY_FORWARDCOUNT.
This attribute is a write-once attribute, once you’ve set it can’t be reset.
CRYPT_PROPERTY_NONEXPORTABLE Boolean
Whether a key in an encryption action object can be exported from the object
in encrypted form. Normally only session keys can be exported, and only in
encrypted form, however in some cases private keys are also exported in
encrypted form when they can are saved to a keyset. By setting this attribute
you can make them non-exportable in any form (some keys, such as those
held in crypto devices, are non-exportable by default).
This attribute is a write-once attribute, once you’ve set it can’t be reset.
CRYPT_PROPERTY_OWNER Numeric
The identity of the thread that owns the object. The thread’s identity is
specified using a value that depends on the operating system, but is usually a
thread handle or thread ID. For example under Windows the thread ID is the
value returned by the GetCurrentThreadID function, which returns a
system-wide unique handle for the current thread.
You can also pass in a value of CRYPT_UNUSED, which unbinds the
object from the thread and makes it accessible to all threads in the process.
CRYPT_PROPERTY_USAGECOUNT Numeric
The number of times an action object can be used before it deletes itself and
becomes unusable. Every time an action object is used (for example when a
signature encryption object is used to create a signature), its usage count is
decremented; once the usage count reaches zero, the object can’t be used to
perform any further actions (although you can still perform non-action
operations such as reading its attributes).
This attribute is useful when you want to restrict the number of times an
object can be used by other code. For example, before you change the
ownership of a signature object to allow it to be used by another thread, you
would set the usage count to 1 to ensure that it can’t be used to sign arbitrary
numbers of messages or transactions. This eliminates a troubling security
problem with objects such as smart cards where, once a user has
authenticated themselves to the card, the software can ask the card to sign
arbitrary numbers of (unauthorised) transactions alongside the authorised
ones.
This attribute is a write-once attribute, once you’ve set it can’t be reset.
For example to create an AES encryption context in one thread and transfer
ownership of the context to another thread you would use:
CRYPT_CONTEXT cryptContext;
The other thread now has exclusive ownership of the context containing the loaded
key. If you wanted to prevent the other thread from transferring the context further,
you would also have to set the CRYPT_PROPERTY_FORWARDCOUNT property
to 1 (to allow you to transfer it) and then set the CRYPT_PROPERTY_LOCKED
attribute (to prevent the other thread from changing the attributes you’ve set).
Note that in the above code the object is claimed as soon as it’s created (and before
any sensitive data is loaded into it) to ensure that another thread isn’t given a chance
to use it when it contains sensitive data. The use of this type of object binding is
recommended when working with sensitive information under Windows since the
Windows API provides several security holes whereby any process in the system may
interfere with resources owned by any other process in the system. The checking for
object ownership which is performed typically adds a few microseconds to each call,
so in extremely time-critical applications you may want to avoid binding an object to
a thread. On the other hand for valuable resources such as private keys, you should
always consider binding them to a thread, since the small overhead becomes
insignificant compared to the cost of the public-key operation.
Although the example shown above is for encryption contexts, the same applies to
other types of objects such as keysets and envelopes (although in that case the
information they contain isn’t as sensitive as it is for encryption contexts). For
container objects that can themselves contain objects (for example keysets), if the
container is bound to a thread then any objects that are retrieved from it are also
bound to the thread. For example if you’re reading a private key from a keyset, you
should bind the keyset to the current thread after you open it (but before you read any
keys) so that any keys read from it will also automatically be bound to the current
thread. In addition if a key which is used to generate another key (for example the
key that imports a session key) is bound, then the resulting generated key will also be
bound.
On non-multithreaded systems, CRYPT_PROPERTY_OWNER and CRYPT_-
PROPERTY_FORWARDCOUNT have no effect, so you can include them in your
code for any type of system.
Another role recognised by cryptlib is that of a certification authority that can make
use of cryptlib’s certificate management functionality but can’t perform general
administrative functions or non-CA-related crypto operations. Again, this provides a
clear separation of duty between the role of the CA and the role of a general user or
SO.
Managing User Roles
When a cryptlib object is created, it is associated with a user role which is specified at
creation time and can’t be accessed by any other user. For example if a private key is
created by a CA for signing certificates, it can’t be accessed by a normal user because
it’s only visible to the user acting in the role of the CA. Similarly, although a normal
user may be able to see a certificate store, only a CA user can use it for the purpose of
issuing certificates. The use of RBAC therefore protects objects from misuse by
unauthorised users.
The identity of the user who owns the object is specified as a parameter for the object
creation function. Throughout the rest of the cryptlib documentation this parameter is
denoted through the use of the cryptUser variable. Usually this parameter is set to
CRYPT_UNUSED to indicate that the user is acting in the role of a normal user and
doesn’t care about role-based controls. This is typically used in cases where there’s
only one cryptlib user, for example where cryptlib is running on an end-user PC (e.g.
Windows, Macintosh) or a multi-user system that provides each user with the illusion
of being on a single-user machine (e.g. Unix). In almost all cases therefore you’d
pass in CRYPT_UNUSED as the user identity parameter.
In a few specialised cases where the user is acting in a role other than that of a normal
user the default user role isn’t enough. For example when you want to access a CA
certificate store you can’t use the role of a normal user to perform the access because
only a CA can manipulate a certificate store. This prevents a normal user from
issuing themselves certificates in the name of the CA and assorted other mischief
such as revoking another user’s certificate.
When acting in a different role than that of the default, normal user, you specify the
identity of the user whose role you’re acting in as a parameter of the object creation
function as before, this time passing in the handle of the user identity instead of
CRYPT_UNUSED. When the object is created, it is associated with the given user
and role instead of the default user. The creation and use of user objects is covered in
the next section.
Creating and Destroying Users and Roles
The following section is provided purely for forwards compatibility with functionality
included in future versions of cryptlib. For the current version of cryptlib the user
identity parameter should always be CRYPT_UNUSED since user object
management isn’t enabled in this version.
User objects can only be created and destroyed by an SO user, this being one of the
special administrative functions mentioned earlier that can only be performed by an
SO. You create a user object with cryptCreateUser, specifying the identity of the
SO who is creating the user object, type of user role that the object is associated with,
the name of the user, and a password that protects access to the user object:
CRYPT_USER cryptUser;
Role Description
CRYPT_USER_SO A security officer who can perform
administrative functions such as creating or
deleting users but who can’t perform any other
type of operation.
For example to create a normal user object for “John Doe” with the password
“password” and a CA user object for “John’s Certificate Authority” with the
password “CA password” you would use:
CRYPT_USER cryptUser, cryptCAUser;
Once a user object is created it can’t be used immediately because it’s still under the
nominal control of the SO who created it rather than the user it’s intended for. Before
it can be used, control over the object needs to be handed over to the user that it’s
intended for. After the object is created by the SO, it is said to be in the SO initialised
state. Any attempt to use an object when it’s in the SO initialised state will result in
cryptlib returning CRYPT_ERROR_NOTINITED.
To move the newly-created object into a usable state, it’s necessary to change its
password from the initial one set by the SO to one chosen by the user. Once this
change occurs, the object is moved into the user initialised state and is ready for use.
You can change the password from the initial one set by the SO to a user-chosen one
with cryptChangePassword:
cryptChangePassword( cryptUser, oldPassword, newPassword );
When the password has been changed from the one set by the SO to the one chosen
by the user, the user object is ready for use.
User objects can also be destroyed by the SO who created them:
cryptDeleteUser( cryptUser, "John Doe" );
Miscellaneous Issues
This section contains additional information that may be useful when working with
cryptlib.
Multi-threaded cryptlib Operation
cryptlib is re-entrant and completely thread-safe (the threading model used is
sometimes known as the free-threading model), allowing it to be used with
multithreaded applications in systems that support threading. When you use cryptlib
in a multithreaded application, you should take standard precautions to ensure that a
single resource shared across multiple threads doesn’t become a bottleneck, with all
threads being forced to wait on a single shared object. For example if you’re
timestamping large numbers of messages then creating a single timestamping session
object (see “Secure Sessions” on page 102) and using that for all timestamping
services will result in all of the operations waiting on a single session object, which
can often take several seconds to turn around a transaction with a remote server. A
better option in this case would be to create a pool of timestamping session objects
and use the next free one when required.
A similar situation occurs with other objects such as crypto devices and keysets that
may be shared across multiple threads. For example cryptlib provides a facility for
automatically fetching a decryption key from a keyset in order to decrypt data (see
“Public-Key Encrypted Enveloping” on page 71). This is convenient when handling
one or two messages since cryptlib will automatically take care of all of the
processing for you, however if you’re processing large numbers of messages then the
need to read and decrypt the same private key for each message is very inefficient,
Miscellaneous Issues 51
not only in terms of CPU overhead but also because every message must wait for
each of the previous messages to be processed before it gets its turn at the keyset.
A better alternative in this case is to read the private key from the keyset just once
and then use it with each envelope, rather than having each envelope read and decrypt
the key itself. Extending this even further, if you’re using a very large private key,
running on a slower processor, or processing large numbers of transactions, you may
want to instantiate multiple copies of the private-key object to avoid the single private
key again becoming a bottleneck.
In general most private-key operations, when performed on modern processors, are
fairly quick, so there’s no need to create large numbers of private-key objects for fear
of them becoming a bottleneck. In this case the primary bottleneck is the need to read
and decrypt the key for each message processed. However, when run on a multiple-
CPU system, you should make some attempt to match objects to CPUs — creating a
single private-key object on a four-CPU system guarantees that the overall
performance will be no better than that of a single-CPU system, since the single
object instance acts as a mutex that can only be acquired by one CPU at a time.
Standard programming practice for efficient utilisation of resources on multiprocessor
systems applies to cryptlib just as it does for other applications. Creating a pool of
objects that can be picked up and used as required would be one standard approach to
this problem. Some operating systems provide special support for this with functions
for thread pooling management. For example, Windows 2000 and XP provide the
QueueUserWorkItem function, which submits a work item to a thread pool for
execution when the next thread becomes available. Windows Vista and newer
include an enhanced version of the thread-pool API that replaces the basic
QueueUserWorkItem with a more conventional CreateThreadpoolWork/-
SubmitThreadpoolWork/CloseThreadpoolWork combination that provides
better control over thread pools, pool management, and pool cleanup.
In order to protect against potential deadlocks when multiple threads are waiting on a
single object, cryptlib includes a watchdog timer that triggers after a certain amount
of time has been spent waiting on the object. Once this occurs, cryptlib will return
CRYPT_ERROR_TIMEOUT to indicate that an object is still in use after waiting for
it to become available. If you experience timeouts of this kind, you should check
your code to see if there are any bottlenecks due to a single object with a long
response time being shared by several fast-response-time objects. Note that timeouts
are also possible with normal cryptlib object use, for example when communicating
data over a slow or stalled network link, so a CRYPT_ERROR_TIMEOUT status
doesn’t automatically mean that the watchdog timer signalled a problem.
To help diagnose situations of this kind, the debug build of cryptlib will display on
the console output an indication that it waited on a particular object, along with the
object type that it waited on. You can use this information to identify potential
bottlenecks in your application.
Linux has a somewhat unusual threading implementation built around the clone()
system call that can lead to unexpected behaviour with some kernel and/or glibc
versions. Two common symptoms of glibc/kernel threading problems are phantom
processes (which are actually glibc-internal threads created via clone()) being left
behind when you application exits, and cryptlib’s internal consistency-checking
throwing an exception in the debug build when it detects an problem with threading.
If you run into either of these situations, you can try different glibc and/or kernel
versions to find a combination that works. Searching Internet newsgroups will
provide a wealth of information and advice on problems with glibc and Linux
threads.
Safeguarding Cryptographic Operations
Running cryptographic operations on general-purpose CPUs shared with other (often
untrusted) programs can expose them to risk if the other programs can closely
observe or even influence the behaviour of the crypto code. In addition it’s possible
for a remote system with the ability to precisely time network packet flows to deduce
52 cryptlib Basics
information about crypto operations like a SSL/TLS handshake that result in network
traffic as the output of the crypto operation. The timing attacks only affect RSA
private-key operations, and only those operations that are directly observable by
another party, for example as a result of a network data exchange involving RSA
decryption or signing.
There are several countermeasures that you can take to avoid this problem. The
simplest approach is to use a different crypto mechanism that isn’t vulnerable to this
problem. By default cryptlib will try and use Diffie-Hellman or ECDH key exchange
in SSL/TLS, which isn’t vulnerable to this type of attack because it uses a new
random value each time, making it impossible to get repeatable timing measurements.
In addition the cryptlib security kernel provides a good degree of protection since it
isolates the RSA crypto operations from external observation, making it quite
difficult to obtain timing information.
If you must use RSA in a manner in which its operation is visible to an external
observer, you can enable randomisation of the RSA operations (known as “blinding”)
in order to provide the same protection that comes built into Diffie-Hellman and
ECDH. Enabling blinding adds a performance overhead of between two and five
percent to each RSA operation. You can enable blinding for RSA operations (and a
few other protection measures) by setting the CRYPT_OPTION_MISC_-
SIDECHANNELPROTECTION configuration option as described in “Working with
Configuration Options” on page 287.
Many modern CPUs include sophisticated diagnostic and monitoring facilities that
provide extensive insight into both the operation of the CPU and the data that it
processes. If untrusted processes are running on a CPU alongside ones performing
crypto operations, it may be possible for the untrusted processes to recover sensitive
data or even crypto keys using built-in CPU monitoring facilities. This can occur
even through indirect means such as observing memory access latencies for cached
vs. un-cached data, or branch times for cached vs. un-cached branch target
information. Since the level of access provided by may of these diagnostic facilities
is almost at the level of an in-circuit emulator (ICE), there are no truly effective
defences against this level of threat.
If you’re using a CPU that provides this detailed monitoring capability and you’re
also working with sensitive data or crypto keys, and in particular the private keys
used in public-key encryption operations, you need to take precautions to ensure that
other code can’t misuse these monitoring capabilities to compromise your keys or
sensitive data. The simplest and most effective defence is “don’t do that, then”:
Don’t allow untrusted code to run alongside your crypto code (or any other code
processing sensitive information for that matter).
If you really need to run arbitrary untrusted code at the same time as code that’s
processing sensitive information, you’ll need to use OS-level scheduling and CPU-
control facilities to ensure that another process or thread can’t run alongside your one
and monitor its operation, and that out-of-band channels like CPU caches are flushed
after your crypto operations have completed.
As an extension of this, it’s almost impossible to defend against hardware-level
attacks using purely software methods. If your threat model involves an attacker who
can walk up to your hardware and attach sensors to it or point an antenna at it then
you need to deal with it via hardware measures such as shielding, signal and power
supply isolation and decoupling, filtering, and so on. Although software developers
like to think that any hardware problem should be fixable via software, in this case it
can’t. If you need resistance to these types of attacks then you need to design or
adapt the hardware to deal with them.
Creating/Destroying Envelopes 53
Data Enveloping
Encryption envelopes are the easiest way to use cryptlib. An envelope is a container
object whose behaviour is modified by the data and resources that you push into it.
To use an envelope, you add to it other container and action objects and resources
such as passwords that control the actions performed by the envelope, and then push
in and pop out data that’s processed according to the resources that you’ve pushed in.
cryptlib takes care of the rest. For example to encrypt the message “This is a secret”
with the password “Secret password” you would do the following:
create the envelope;
add the password attribute "Secret password" to the envelope;
push data "This is a secret" into the envelope;
pop encrypted data from the envelope;
destroy the envelope;
That’s all that’s necessary. Since you’ve added a password attribute, cryptlib knows
that you want to encrypt the data in the envelope with the password, so it encrypts the
data and returns it to you. This process is referred to as enveloping the data.
The opposite, de-enveloping process consists of:
create the envelope;
push encrypted data into the envelope;
add the password attribute "Secret password" to the envelope;
pop decrypted data from the envelope;
destroy the envelope;
cryptlib knows the type of encrypted data that it’s working with (it can inform you
that you need to push in a password if you don’t know that in advance), decrypts it
with the provided password, and returns the result to you.
This example illustrates a feature of the de-enveloping process that may at first seem
slightly unusual: You have to push in some encrypted data before you can add the
password attribute needed to decrypt it. This is because cryptlib will automatically
determine what to do with the data you give it, so if you added a password before you
pushed in the encrypted data cryptlib wouldn’t know what to do with the password.
Signing data is almost identical, except that you add a signature key attribute instead
of a password. You can also add a number of other encryption attributes depending
on the type of functionality you want. Since all of these require further knowledge of
cryptlib’s capabilities, only basic data, compressed-data, and password-based
enveloping will be covered in this section.
Due to constraints in the underlying data formats that cryptlib supports, you can’t
perform more than one step of compression, encryption, or signing using a single
envelope (the resulting data stream can’t be encoded using most of the common data
formats supported by cryptlib). If you want to perform more than one of these
operations, you need to use multiple envelopes, one for each of the processing steps
you want to perform. If you try and add an encryption attribute to an envelope which
is set up for signing, or a signing attribute to an envelope which is set up for
encryption, or some other conflicting combination, cryptlib will return a parameter
error to indicate that the attribute type is invalid for this envelope since it’s already
being used for a different purpose.
Creating/Destroying Envelopes
Envelopes are accessed through envelope objects that work in the same general
manner as the other container objects used by cryptlib. Before you can envelope or
de-envelope data you need to create the appropriate type of envelope for the job. If
you want to envelope some data, you would create the envelope with
cryptCreateEnvelope, specifying the user who is to own the device object or
CRYPT_UNUSED for the default, normal user, and the format for the enveloped data
(for now you should use CRYPT_FORMAT_CRYPTLIB, the default format):
54 Data Enveloping
CRYPT_ENVELOPE cryptEnvelope;
/* Perform enveloping */
cryptDestroyEnvelope( cryptEnvelope );
cryptDestroyEnvelope cryptEvelope
The C#, Java, and Python versions (here as elsewhere) migrate the output value to the
return value, and return errors by throwing exceptions. The Python version is:
cryptEnvelope = cryptCreateEnvelope( cryptUser,
CRYPT_FORMAT_CRYPTLIB )
If you want to de-envelope the result of the previous enveloping process, you would
create the envelope with format CRYPT_FORMAT_AUTO, which tells cryptlib to
automatically detect and use the appropriate format to process the data:
CRYPT_ENVELOPE cryptEnvelope;
/* Perform de-enveloping */
cryptDestroyEnvelope( cryptEnvelope );
To de-envelope data:
The Data Enveloping Process 55
push in data
(cryptlib will inform you what resource(s) it needs to process the
data)
add the required attribute such as a password or key
pop out processed data
The function will return an indication of how many bytes were copied into the
envelope in bytesCopied. Usually this is the same as the number of bytes you
pushed in, but if the envelope is almost full or you’re trying to push in a very large
amount of data, only some of the data may be copied in. This is useful when you
want to process a large quantity of data in multiple sections, which is explained
further on.
When you push in data, cryptlib may return an advisory CRYPT_-
ENVELOPE_RESOURCE status, which indicates that additional information such as
a password or decryption key is required in order to continue. Until you supply the
necessary resource, cryptlib can’t process the data that you’ve given it, and any
further attempts to push or pop data will fail with a CRYPT_ENVELOPE_-
RESOURCE. The handling of de-encryption resources is covered in more detail in
the following sections.
Popping data works similarly to pushing data:
cryptPopData( envelope, buffer, bufferSize, &bytesCopied );
In this case you supply a buffer to copy the data to, and an indication of how many
bytes you want to accept, and the function will return the number of bytes actually
copied in bytesCopied. This could be anything from zero up to the full buffer
size, depending on how much data is present in the envelope.
Once you’ve pushed the entire quantity of data that you want to process into an
envelope, you need to use cryptFlushData to tell the envelope object to wrap up the
data processing. If you try to push in any more data after this point, cryptlib will
return a CRYPT_ERROR_COMPLETE error to indicate that processing of the data
in the envelope has been completed and no more data can be added.
Checking the status of cryptFlushData when you’re de-enveloping data is
particularly important because, if there’s an integrity check such as a digital signature
applied to the envelope then any problem with it will be reported at this point (it may
also be reported on the last cryptPushData, depending on how far cryptlib gets in
processing the integrity-check information at the end of the envelope). Because of
this it’s important to always finish processing with a cryptFlushData, and to check
the return values of the cryptPushData/cryptFlushData in case cryptlib indicates
that the data that you’ve de-enveloped has been tampered with.
56 Data Enveloping
You can add enveloping and de-enveloping attributes to an envelope in the usual
manner with cryptSetAttribute and cryptSetAttributeString. For example to add
the password “password” to an envelope, you would set the CRYPT_ENVINFO_-
PASSWORD attribute:
cryptSetAttributeString( cryptEnvelope, CRYPT_ENVINFO_PASSWORD,
"password", 8 );
The various types of attributes that you can add are explained in more detail further
on.
Data Size Considerations
When you add data to an envelope, cryptlib processes and encodes it in a manner that
allows arbitrary amounts of data to be added. If cryptlib knows in advance how much
data will be pushed into the envelope, it can use a more efficient encoding method
since it doesn’t have to take into account an indefinitely long data stream. You can
notify cryptlib of the overall data size by setting the CRYPT_ENVINFO_DATASIZE
attribute:
cryptSetAttribute( envelope, CRYPT_ENVINFO_DATASIZE, dataSize );
This tells cryptlib how much data will be added, and allows it to use the more
efficient encoding format. If you push in more data than this before you wrap up the
processing with cryptFlushData, cryptlib will return CRYPT_ERROR_-
OVERFLOW; if you push in less, it will return CRYPT_ERROR_UNDERFLOW.
There is one exception to this rule, which occurs when you’re using the
PGP/OpenPGP data format. PGP requires that the length be indicated at the start of
every message, so you always have to set the CRYPT_ENVINFO_DATASIZE
attribute when you perform PGP enveloping. If you try and push data into a PGP
envelope without setting the data size, cryptlib will return CRYPT_ERROR_-
NOTINITED to tell you that it can’t envelope the data without knowing its overall
size in advance. PGP/OpenPGP enveloping is explained in more detail in “PGP” on
page 92.
The amount of data popped out of an envelope never matches the amount pushed in,
because the enveloping process adds encryption headers, digital signature
information, and assorted other paraphernalia which is required to process a message.
In many cases the overhead involved in wrapping up a block of data in an envelope
can be noticeable, so you should always push and pop as much data at once into and
out of an envelope as you can. For example if you have a 100-byte message and push
it in as 10 lots of 10 bytes, this is much slower than pushing a single lot of 100 bytes.
This behaviour is identical to the behaviour in applications like disk or network I/O,
where writing a single big file to disk is a lot more efficient than writing 10 smaller
files, and writing a single big network data packet is more efficient than writing 10
smaller data packets.
Pushing and popping unnecessarily small blocks of data when the total data size is
unknown can also affect the overall enveloped data size. If you haven’t told cryptlib
how much data you plan to process with CRYPT_ENVINFO_DATASIZE then each
time you pop a block of data from an envelope, cryptlib has to wrap up the current
block and add header information to it to allow it to be de-enveloped later on.
Because this encoding overhead consumes extra space, you should again try to push
and pop a single large data block rather than many small ones (to prevent worst-case
behaviour, cryptlib will coalesce adjacent small blocks into a minimum block size of
32 bytes, so it won’t return an individual block containing less than 32 bytes unless
it’s the last block in the envelope). This is again like disk data storage or network
I/O, where many small files or data packets lead to greater fragmentation and wasted
storage space or network overhead than a single large file or packet.
The Data Enveloping Process 57
By default the envelope object which is created will have a 16K data buffer on DOS
and 16-bit Windows systems, and a 32K buffer elsewhere. The size of the internal
buffer affects the amount of extra processing that cryptlib needs to perform; a large
buffer will reduce the amount of copying to and from the buffer, but will consume
more memory (the ideal situation to aim for is one in which the data fits completely
within the buffer, which means that it can be processed in a single operation). Since
the process of encrypting and/or signing the data can increase its overall size, you
should make the buffer 1-2K larger than the total data size if you want to process the
data in one go. The minimum buffer size is 4K, and on 16-bit systems the maximum
buffer size is 32K-1.
If want to use a buffer which is smaller or larger than the default size, you can specify
its size using the CRYPT_ATTRIBUTE_BUFFERSIZE attribute after the envelope
has been created. For example if you knew you were going to be processing a single
80K message on a 32-bit system (you can’t process more than 32K-1 bytes at once on
a 16-bit system) you would use:
CRYPT_ENVELOPE cryptEnvelope;
/* Perform enveloping */
cryptDestroyEnvelope( cryptEnvelope );
(the extra 10K provides a generous safety margin for message expansion due to the
enveloping process). When you specify the size of the buffer, you should try and
make it as large as possible, unless you’re pretty certain you’ll only be seeing
messages up to a certain size. Remember, the larger the buffer, the less processing
overhead is involved in handling data. However, if you make the buffer excessively
large it increases the probability that the data in it will be swapped out to disk, so it’s
a good idea not to go overboard on buffer size. You don’t have to process the entire
message at once, cryptlib provides the ability to envelope or de-envelope data in
multiple sections to allow processing of arbitrary amounts of data even on systems
with only small amounts of memory available.
Basic Data Enveloping
In the simplest case the entire message you want to process will fit into the
envelope’s internal buffer. The simplest type of enveloping does nothing to the data
at all, but just wraps it and unwraps it:
CRYPT_ENVELOPE cryptEnvelope;
int bytesCopied;
/* Add the data size information and data, wrap up the processing, and
pop out the processed data */
cryptSetAttribute( cryptEnvelope, CRYPT_ENVINFO_DATASIZE,
messageLength );
cryptPushData( cryptEnvelope, message, messageLength, &bytesCopied );
cryptFlushData( cryptEnvelope );
cryptPopData( cryptEnvelope, envelopedData, envelopedDataBufferSize,
&bytesCopied );
' Add the data size information and data, wrap up the processing, and
' pop out the processed data
cryptSetAttribute cryptEnvelope, CRYPT_ENVINFO_DATASIZE, messageLength
cryptPushData cryptEnvelope, message, messageLength, bytesCopied
cryptFlushData cryptEnvelope
cryptPopData cryptEnvelope, envelopedData, envelopedDataBufferSize, _
bytesCopied
# Add the data size information and data, wrap up the processing, and
# pop out the processed data
cryptEnvelope.ENVINFO_DATASIZE = len( message )
bytesCopied = cryptPushData( cryptEnvelope, message )
cryptFlushData( cryptEnvelope )
bytesCopied = cryptPopData( cryptEnvelope, envelopedData,
envelopedDataBufferSize )
// Add the data size information and data, wrap up the processing, and
// pop out the processed data
crypt.SetAttribute( cryptEnvelope, crypt.ENVINFO_DATASIZE,
message.Length );
bytesCopied = crypt.PushData( cryptEnvelope, message );
crypt.FlushData( cryptEnvelope );
bytesCopied = crypt.PopData( cryptEnvelope, envelopedData,
envelopedDataBufferSize );
(the above code is for C#, the Java version is virtually identical except that the
message.Length of a C# byte array is message.length in Java).
To de-envelope the resulting data you would use:
CRYPT_ENVELOPE cryptEnvelope;
int bytesCopied;
/* Push in the enveloped data and pop out the recovered message */
cryptPushData( cryptEnvelope, envelopedData, envelopedDataSize,
&bytesCopied );
cryptFlushData( cryptEnvelope );
cryptPopData( cryptEnvelope, message, messageBufferSize,
&bytesCopied );
' Push in the enveloped data and pop out the recovered message
cryptPushData cryptEnvelope, envelopedData, envelopedDataSize, _
bytesCopied
cryptFlushData cryptEnvelope
cryptPopData cryptEnvelope, message, messageBufferSize, bytesCopied
This type of enveloping isn’t terribly useful, but it does demonstrate how the
enveloping process works.
Compressed Data Enveloping
A variation of basic data enveloping is compressed data enveloping which
compresses or decompresses data during the enveloping process. Compressing data
before signing or encryption improves the overall enveloping throughput
(compressing data and encrypting the compressed data is faster than just encrypting
the larger, uncompressed data), increases security by removing known patterns in the
data, and saves storage space and network bandwidth.
To tell cryptlib to compress data that you add to an envelope, you should set the
CRYPT_ENVINFO_COMPRESSION attribute before you add the data. This
attribute doesn’t take a value, so you should set it to CRYPT_UNUSED. The code to
compress a message is then:
CRYPT_ENVELOPE cryptEnvelope;
int bytesCopied;
/* Add the data size information and data, wrap up the processing, and
pop out the processed data */
cryptSetAttribute( cryptEnvelope, CRYPT_ENVINFO_DATASIZE,
messageLength );
cryptPushData( cryptEnvelope, message, messageLength, &bytesCopied );
cryptFlushData( cryptEnvelope );
cryptPopData( cryptEnvelope, envelopedData, envelopedDataBufferSize,
&bytesCopied );
cryptDestroyEnvelope( cryptEnvelope );
cryptFlushData( cryptEnvelope );
cryptPopData( cryptEnvelope, outBuffer, BUFFER_SIZE, &bytesCopied
);
}
while( bytesCopied > 0 );
To handle this in a more general manner, you should use the processing techniques
described in “Enveloping Large Data Quantities” on page 66.
Password-based Encryption Enveloping
To do something useful (security-wise) to the data, you need to add a container or
action object or other type of attribute to tell the envelope to secure the data in some
way. For example if you wanted to encrypt a message with a password you would
use:
CRYPT_ENVELOPE cryptEnvelope;
int bytesCopied;
/* Add the data size information and data, wrap up the processing, and
pop out the processed data */
cryptSetAttribute( cryptEnvelope, CRYPT_ENVINFO_DATASIZE,
messageLength );
cryptPushData( cryptEnvelope, message, messageLength, &bytesCopied );
cryptFlushData( cryptEnvelope );
cryptPopData( cryptEnvelope, envelopedData, envelopedDataBufferSize,
&bytesCopied );
cryptDestroyEnvelope( cryptEnvelope );
The same operation in Java (for C# replace the .length with .Length) is:
int cryptEnvelope = crypt.CreateEnvelope( cryptUser
/* crypt.UNUSED */, crypt.FORMAT_CRYPTLIB );
/* Add the data size information and data, wrap up the processing, and
pop out the processed data */
crypt.SetAttribute( cryptEnvelope, crypt.ENVINFO_DATASIZE,
message.length );
int bytesCopied = crypt.PushData( cryptEnvelope, message );
crypt.FlushData( cryptEnvelope );
bytesCopied = crypt.PopData( cryptEnvelope, envelopedData,
envelopedData.length );
crypt.DestroyEnvelope( cryptEnvelope );
cryptDestroyEnvelope( cryptEnvelope );
The Data Enveloping Process 61
In order to protect against this type of attack, cryptlib uses authenticated encryption
that both encrypts the envelope’s contents and protects it against tampering by
attackers. If even a single bit of the encrypted data is changed, cryptlib will return a
CRYPT_ERROR_SIGNATURE when it’s finished processing the data in the same
way that it would for a digitally signed envelope as described in “Digitally Signed
Enveloping” on page 75, providing the benefits of a digitally signed envelope without
any need to explicitly manage a digital signature.
As with standard digitally-signed envelopes, cryptlib can’t perform the integrity-
verification until it’s seen all of the envelope data. If you’re using cryptlib in a
streaming implementation in which messages aren’t processed in one go you should
take care not to hand the decrypted data over to the user until the integrity check bas
completed. This could become an issue if, for example, you hand them the first half
of a decrypted message while waiting for the second half to arrive, allowing them to
act on a (partial) message whose integrity hasn’t yet been verified.
A less obvious way in which the integrity-verification can be defeated is if an attacker
truncates the encrypted data, leaving it (and the integrity check) incomplete. In
general cryptlib will detect most types of truncation attack and report them as a
CRYPT_ERROR_SIGNATURE, but in some cases it’s not possible to tell whether
information is missing because of an attack or because the caller hasn’t pushed it into
the envelope yet. If your application ignores some envelope error codes like
CRYPT_ERROR_UNDERFLOW or treats them as non-serious then it may miss this
truncation. As a general rule if you complete the de-enveloping and get a
CRYPT_ERROR_UNDERFLOW error (that data required for the integrity check
wasn’t available) then you should treat it as a CRYPT_ERROR_SIGNATURE-type
authentication failure.
Alternatively, you can make the authentication check an explicit part of the de-
enveloping process by reading the envelope’s CRYPT_ENVINFO_SIGNATURE_-
RESULT attribute as described in “Digitally Signed Enveloping” on page 75:
int signatureResult;
CRYPT_ENVELOPE cryptEnvelope;
CRYPT_CONTEXT cryptContext;
int bytesCopied;
/* Add the data size information and data, wrap up the processing, and
pop out the processed data */
cryptSetAttribute( cryptEnvelope, CRYPT_ENVINFO_DATASIZE,
messageLength );
cryptPushData( cryptEnvelope, message, messageLength, &bytesCopied );
cryptFlushData( cryptEnvelope );
cryptPopData( cryptEnvelope, envelopedData, envelopedDataBufferSize,
&bytesCopied );
cryptDestroyEnvelope( cryptEnvelope );
/* Push in the enveloped data and the session key context required to
de-envelope it, and pop out the recovered message */
cryptPushData( cryptEnvelope, envelopedData, envelopedDataLength,
&bytesCopied );
cryptCreateContext( &cryptContext, cryptUser /* CRYPT_UNUSED */,
CRYPT_ALGO_IDEA );
cryptSetAttributeString( cryptContext, CRYPT_CTXINFO_KEY,
"0123456789ABCDEF", 16 );
cryptSetAttribute( cryptEnvelope, CRYPT_ENVINFO_SESSIONKEY,
cryptContext );
cryptDestroyContext( cryptContext );
cryptFlushData( cryptEnvelope );
cryptPopData( cryptEnvelope, message, messageBufferSize,
&bytesCopied );
cryptDestroyEnvelope( cryptEnvelope );
Encrypting the data directly by using the context to wrap up the session key and then
encrypting the data with that functions identically, except that the context is added as
CRYPT_ENVINFO_KEY rather than CRYPT_ENVINFO_SESSIONKEY. The
only real difference between the two is the underlying data format that cryptlib
generates. As with the password-based de-enveloping, cryptlib will return an
advisory CRYPT_ENVELOPE_RESOURCE status when you push in the data to let
you know that you need to provide a decryption key in order to continue, and will use
authenticated encryption to protect the encrypted data from tampering by attackers.
Raw session-key based enveloping isn’t recommended since it bypasses much of the
automated key management which is performed by the enveloping code, and requires
the direct use of low-level encryption contexts. If all you want to do is change the
underlying encryption algorithm used from the default AES, it’s easier to do this by
setting the CRYPT_OPTION_ENCR_ALGO attribute for the envelope as described
in “Working with Configuration Options” on page 287. In addition it’s not possible
to use authenticated encryption in combination with raw session-key based
enveloping because the use of the low-level encryption context precludes the use of
authenticated encryption modes.
64 Data Enveloping
Authenticated Enveloping
Sometimes you may want to protect data against modification without encrypting it, a
variation on the use of authenticated encryption described above. To provide
integrity protection for the contents of an envelope, you need to use an authenticated
envelope. You can tell cryptlib to add authentication to an envelope by setting the
CRYPT_ENVINFO_INTEGRITY attribute before you push data into the envelope.
By default this has a setting of CRYPT_INTEGRITY_NONE, which means that the
contents are protected by encryption only. If you want to provide authentication
(without encryption) for the data, you can set the CRYPT_ENVINFO_INTEGRITY
to CRYPT_INTEGRITY_MACONLY (a MAC is a cryptographic message
authentication code used to protect the contents of the envelope). The data
processing works just like a standard encrypted envelope:
CRYPT_ENVELOPE cryptEnvelope;
int bytesCopied;
/* Add the data size information and data, wrap up the processing, and
pop out the processed data */
cryptSetAttribute( cryptEnvelope, CRYPT_ENVINFO_DATASIZE,
messageLength );
cryptPushData( cryptEnvelope, message, messageLength, &bytesCopied );
cryptFlushData( cryptEnvelope );
cryptPopData( cryptEnvelope, envelopedData, envelopedDataBufferSize,
&bytesCopied );
cryptDestroyEnvelope( cryptEnvelope );
Note that you have to set the CRYPT_ENVINFO_INTEGRITY attribute before you
add an encryption key or password, otherwise cryptlib will assume that you want to
use the key to encrypt rather than authenticate the envelope contents.
When you de-envelope the data, cryptlib will use the MAC to check the integrity of
the envelope contents. If the data has been modified, cryptlib will return
CRYPT_ERROR_SIGNATURE once you’ve pushed the final portion of the
enveloped data into the envelope:
CRYPT_ENVELOPE cryptEnvelope;
int bytesCopied;
cryptDestroyEnvelope( cryptEnvelope );
You can also read the result of the integrity check by reading the CRYPT_-
ENVINFO_SIGNATURE_RESULT attribute, which works in much the same way as
The Data Enveloping Process 65
it does for signed envelopes, which are discussed in “Digitally Signed Enveloping”
on page 75.
De-enveloping Mixed Data
Sometimes you won’t know exactly what type of processing has been applied to the
data that you’re trying to de-envelope, so you can let cryptlib tell you what to do.
When cryptlib needs some sort of resource (such as a password or an encryption key)
to process the data that you’ve pushed into an envelope, it will return a CRYPT_-
ENVELOPE_RESOURCE status if you try and push in any more data or pop out the
processed data. This status code is returned as soon as cryptlib knows enough about
the data that you’re pushing into the envelope to be able to process it properly.
Typically, as soon as you start pushing in encrypted, signed, or otherwise processed
data, cryptPushData will return CRYPT_ENVELOPE_RESOURCE to tell you that
it needs some sort of resource in order to continue.
If you knew that the data that you were processing was either plain, unencrypted data,
compressed data, or password-encrypted data created using the code shown earlier,
then you could de-envelope it with:
CRYPT_ENVELOPE cryptEnvelope;
int bytesCopied, status;
/* Push in the enveloped data and pop out the recovered message */
status = cryptPushData( cryptEnvelope, envelopedData,
envelopedDataLength, &bytesCopied );
if( status == CRYPT_ENVELOPE_RESOURCE )
cryptSetAttributeString( cryptEnvelope, CRYPT_ENVINFO_PASSWORD,
password, passwordLength );
cryptFlushData( cryptEnvelope );
cryptPopData( cryptEnvelope, message, messageBufferSize,
&bytesCopied );
cryptDestroyEnvelope( cryptEnvelope );
If the data is enveloped without any processing or is compressed data, cryptlib will
de-envelope it without requiring any extra input. If the data is enveloped using
password-based encryption, cryptlib will return CRYPT_ENVELOPE_RESOURCE
to indicate that it needs a password before it can continue.
This illustrates the manner in which the enveloped data contains enough information
to allow cryptlib to process it automatically. If the data had been enveloped using
some other form of processing (for example public-key encryption or digital
signatures), cryptlib would ask you for the private decryption key or the signature
check key at this time (it’s actually slightly more complex than this, the details are
explained in “Enveloping with Multiple Attributes” on page 78).
De-enveloping with a Large Envelope Buffer
If you’ve increased the envelope buffer size to allow the processing of large data
quantities, the de-enveloping process may be slightly different. When de-enveloping
data, cryptlib only reads an initial fixed amount of data before stopping and asking for
user input such as the password or private key which is required to process the data.
This is to avoid the situation where an envelope absorbs megabytes or even gigabytes
of data only to report that it can’t even begin to process it for lack of a decryption
key. In this case the envelope will return CRYPT_ERROR_RESOURCE to indicate
that it requires further information in order to continue. Once you’ve added the
necessary de-enveloping attribute(s), you can either pop what’s already been
processed and continue as normal (see “Enveloping Large Data Quantities” on page
66) or, for a sufficiently large envelope buffer, push in the remaining data before
popping it all at once:
66 Data Enveloping
CRYPT_ENVELOPE cryptEnvelope;
int bytesCopied, status;
/* Push in the enveloped data and see if we need any special handling
*/
status = cryptPushData( cryptEnvelope, envelopedData,
envelopedDataLength, &bytesCopied );
if( status == CRYPT_ENVELOPE_RESOURCE )
{
/* Add the necessary de-enveloping attributes */
/* ... */
cryptDestroyEnvelope( cryptEnvelope );
This code checks whether the envelope has absorbed all of the enveloped data and, if
not, pushes the remainder after adding the attribute(s) necessary for processing it.
Once all of the data has been pushed, it pops the result as usual.
Obtaining Envelope Security Parameters
If you want to know the details of the encryption mechanism that’s being used to
protect the enveloped data, you can read various CRYPT_CTXINFO_xxx attributes
from the envelope object which will return information from the encryption
context(s) that are being used to secure the data. For example if you’re encrypting or
decrypting data you can get the encryption algorithm and mode and the key size
being used with:
CRYPT_ALGO_TYPE cryptAlgo;
CRYPT_MODE_TYPE cryptMode;
int keySize;
Since there’s a little overhead added by the enveloping process, you should always
push in slightly less data than the envelope buffer size. Alternatively, you can use the
CRYPT_ATTRIBUTE_BUFFERSIZE to specify an envelope buffer which is slightly
larger than the data block size that you want to use. The following code uses the first
technique to password-encrypt a file in blocks of BUFFER_SIZE – 4K bytes:
CRYPT_ENVELOPE cryptEnvelope;
void *buffer;
int bufferCount;
/* Create the envelope with a buffer of size BUFFER_SIZE and add the
password attribute */
cryptCreateEnvelope( &cryptEnvelope, cryptUser /* CRYPT_UNUSED */,
CRYPT_FORMAT_CRYPTLIB );
cryptSetAttribute( cryptEnvelope, CRYPT_ATTRIBUTE_BUFFERSIZE,
BUFFER_SIZE );
cryptSetAttributeString( cryptEnvelope, CRYPT_ENVINFO_PASSWORD,
password, passwordLength );
cryptDestroyEnvelope( cryptEnvelope );
' Create the envelope with a buffer of size BUFFER_SIZE and add the
' password attribute
cryptCreateEnvelope cryptEnvelope, cryptUser, CRYPT_FORMAT_CRYPTLIB
cryptSetAttribute cryptEnvelope, CRYPT_ATTRIBUTE_BUFFERSIZE, _
BUFFER_SIZE
cryptSetAttributeString cryptEnvelope, CRYPT_ENVINFO_PASSWORD, _
password, Len( password )
cryptDestroyEnvelope cryptEnvelope
68 Data Enveloping
This results in the most efficient use of the envelope’s internal buffer, but is probably
overkill for the amount of code complexity required:
CRYPT_ENVELOPE cryptEnvelope;
void *inBuffer, *outBuffer;
int bytesCopiedIn, bytesCopiedOut, bufferCount;
/* Read a buffer full of data from the file and push and pop it
to/from the envelope */
bufferCount = readFile( inputFile, inBuffer, BUFFER_SIZE );
while( bufferCount > 0 )
{
/* Push as much as we can into the envelope */
cryptPushData( cryptEnvelope, inBuffer + offset, bufferCount,
&bytesCopiedIn );
offset += bytesCopiedIn;
bufferCount -= bytesCopiedIn;
}
}
cryptDestroyEnvelope( cryptEnvelope );
Running the code to fill/empty the envelope in a loop is useful when you’re applying
a transformation such as data compression, which dramatically changes the length of
the enveloped/de-enveloped data. In this case it’s not possible to tell how much data
you can push into or pop out of the envelope because the length is transformed by the
compression operation. It’s also generally good practice to not write code that makes
assumptions about the amount of internal buffer space available in the envelope, the
above code will make optimal use of the envelope buffer no matter what its size.
Enveloping with Many Enveloping Attributes
There may be a special-case condition when you begin the enveloping that occurs if
you’ve added a large number of password, encryption, or keying attributes to the
envelope so that the header prepended to the enveloped data is particularly large. For
example if you encrypt a message with different keys or passwords for several dozen
recipients, the header information for all the keys could become large enough that it
occupies a noticeable portion of the envelope’s buffer. In this case you can push in a
small amount of data to flush out the header information, and then push and pop data
as usual:
add many password/encryption/keying attributes;
push a small amount of data;
pop data;
loop
push data;
pop data;
If you use this strategy then you can trim the difference between the envelope buffer
size and the amount of data you push in at once down to about 1K; the 4K difference
shown earlier took into account the fact that a little extra data would be generated the
first time data was pushed due to the overhead of adding the envelope header:
CRYPT_ENVELOPE cryptEnvelope;
void *buffer;
int bufferCount;
/* Read up to 100 bytes from the input file, push it into the envelope
to flush out the header data, and write all the data in the
envelope to the output file */
bufferCount = readFile( inputFile, buffer, 100 );
cryptPushData( cryptEnvelope, buffer, bufferCount, &bytesCopied );
cryptPopData( cryptEnvelope, buffer, BUFFER_SIZE, &bytesCopied );
writeFile( outputFile, buffer, bytesCopied );
70 Data Enveloping
/* Read a BUFFER_SIZE block from the input file, envelope it, and
write the result to the output file */
bufferCount = readFile( inputFile, buffer, BUFFER_SIZE );
cryptPushData( cryptEnvelope, buffer, bufferCount, &bytesCopied );
cryptPopData( cryptEnvelope, buffer, BUFFER_SIZE, &bytesCopied );
writeFile( outputFile, buffer, bytesCopied );
}
cryptDestroyEnvelope( cryptEnvelope );
Advanced Enveloping
The previous chapter covered basic enveloping concepts and simple password-based
enveloping. Extending beyond these basic forms of enveloping, you can also
envelope data using public-key encryption or digitally sign the contents of the
envelope. These types of enveloping require the use of public and private keys that
are explained in various other chapters that cover key generation, key databases, and
certificates.
cryptlib automatically manages objects such as public and private keys and keysets,
so you can destroy them as soon as you’ve pushed them into the envelope. Although
the object will appear to have been destroyed, the envelope maintains its own
reference to it which it can continue to use for encryption or signing. This means that
instead of the obvious:
create the key object;
create the envelope;
add the key object to the envelope;
push data into the envelope;
pop encrypted data from the envelope;
destroy the envelope;
destroy the key object;
Keeping an object active for the shortest possible time makes it much easier to track,
it’s a lot easier to let cryptlib manage these things for you by handing them off to the
envelope.
/* Add the data size information and data, wrap up the processing, and
pop out the processed data */
cryptSetAttribute( cryptEnvelope, CRYPT_ENVINFO_DATASIZE,
messageLength );
cryptPushData( cryptEnvelope, message, messageLength, &bytesCopied );
cryptFlushData( cryptEnvelope );
cryptPopData( cryptEnvelope, envelopedData, envelopedDataBufferSize,
&bytesCopied );
cryptDestroyEnvelope( cryptEnvelope );
You can also use a certificate in place of the public key, the envelope will handle both
in the same way. The certificate is typically obtained by reading it from a keyset,
either directly using cryptGetPublicKey as described in “Reading a Key from a
Keyset” on page 145, or by setting the CRYPT_ENVINFO_RECIPIENT attribute as
72 Advanced Enveloping
/* Add the data size information and data, wrap up the processing, and
pop out the processed data */
crypt.SetAttribute( cryptEnvelope, crypt.ENVINFO_DATASIZE,
message.length );
int bytesCopied = crypt.PushData( cryptEnvelope, message );
crypt.FlushData( cryptEnvelope );
bytesCopied = crypt.PopData( cryptEnvelope, envelopedData,
envelopedData.length );
crypt.DestroyEnvelope( cryptEnvelope );
/* Push in the enveloped data and the private decryption key required
to de-envelope it, and pop out the recovered message */
cryptPushData( cryptEnvelope, envelopedData, envelopedDataLength,
&bytesCopied );
cryptSetAttribute( cryptEnvelope, CRYPT_ENVINFO_PRIVATEKEY,
privKeyContext );
cryptFlushData( cryptEnvelope );
cryptPopData( cryptEnvelope, message, messageBufferSize, &bytesCopied
);
cryptDestroyEnvelope( cryptEnvelope );
Although this leads to very simple code, it’s somewhat awkward since you may not
know in advance which private key is required to decrypt a message. To make the
private key handling process easier, cryptlib provides the ability to automatically
fetch decryption keys from a private key keyset for you, so that instead of adding a
private key, you add a private key keyset object and cryptlib takes care of obtaining
the key for you. Alternatively, you can use a crypto device such as a smart card or
Fortezza card to perform the decryption.
Using a private key from a keyset is slightly more complex than pushing in the
private key directly since the private key stored in the keyset is usually encrypted or
PIN-protected and will require a password or PIN supplied by the user to access it.
This means that you have to supply a password to the envelope before the private key
can be used to decrypt the data in it. This works as follows:
Public-Key Encrypted Enveloping 73
When you add the password, cryptlib will use it to try to recover the private key
stored in the keyset you added previously. If the password is incorrect, cryptlib will
return CRYPT_ERROR_WRONGKEY, otherwise it will recover the private key and
then use that to decrypt the data. The full code to decrypt public-key enveloped data
is therefore:
CRYPT_ENVELOPE cryptEnvelope;
CRYPT_ATTRIBUTE_TYPE requiredAttribute;
int bytesCopied, status;
/* Create the envelope and add the private key keyset and data */
cryptCreateEnvelope( &cryptEnvelope, cryptUser /* CRYPT_UNUSED */,
CRYPT_FORMAT_AUTO );
cryptSetAttribute( cryptEnvelope, CRYPT_ENVINFO_KEYSET_DECRYPT,
privKeyKeyset );
cryptPushData( cryptEnvelope, envelopedData, envelopedDataLength,
&bytesCopied );
/* Find out what we need to continue and, if it's a private key, add
the password to recover it from the keyset */
cryptGetAttribute( cryptEnvelope, CRYPT_ATTRIBUTE_CURRENT,
&requiredAttribute );
if( requiredAttribute != CRYPT_ENVINFO_PRIVATEKEY )
/* Error */;
cryptSetAttributeString( cryptEnvelope, CRYPT_ENVINFO_PASSWORD,
password, passwordLength );
cryptFlushData( cryptEnvelope );
' Create the envelope and add the private key and data
cryptCreateEnvelope cryptEnvelope, cryptUser, CRYPT_FORMAT_AUTO
cryptSetAttribute cryptEnvelope, CRYPT_ENVINFO_KEYSET_DECRYPT, _
privateKeyset
cryptPushData cryptEnvelope, envelopedData, envelopedDataLength, _
bytesCopied
' Find out what we need to continue, and if it's a private key,
' add the password to recover it from the keyset
cryptGetAttribute cryptEnvelope, CRYPT_ATTRIBUTE_CURRENT, _
requiredAttribute
If ( requredAttribute <> CRYPT_ENVINFO_PRIVATEKEY ) Then
' Error
End If
cryptSetAttributeString cryptEnvelope, CRYPT_ENVINFO_PASSWORD, _
password, len( password )
cryptFlushData cryptEnvelope
In the unusual case where the private key isn’t protected by a password or PIN,
there’s no need to add the password since cryptlib will use the private key as soon as
you access the attribute information by reading it using cryptGetAttribute.
In order to ask the user for a password, it can be useful to know the name or label
attached to the private key so you can display it as part of the password request
74 Advanced Enveloping
message. You can obtain the label for the required private key by reading the
envelope’s CRYPT_ENVINFO_PRIVATEKEY_LABEL attribute:
char label[ CRYPT_MAX_TEXTSIZE + 1 ];
int labelLength;
cryptGetAttributeString( cryptEnvelope,
CRYPT_ENVINFO_PRIVATEKEY_LABEL, label, &labelLength );
label[ labelLength ] = '\0';
You can then use the key label when you ask the user for the password for the key.
Note that there is one situation where having cryptlib retrieve the private key from a
keyset isn’t a good idea and that’s when you’re processing a high volume of
messages with a single key or one of a small number of keys. Retrieving and
unwrapping a private key has a considerable CPU overhead since it’s deliberately
made to be a slow operation in order to defeat brute-force guessing attacks on the
key. This means that quite a bit of CPU time is required each time a private key is
read and unwrapped. If you’re using the key repeatedly to process many messages
then it makes more sense to read it into memory once with cryptGetPrivateKey and
then add it on each decrypt as a CRYPT_ENVINFO_PRIVATEKEY, rather than
having cryptlib read and unwrap it from a CRYPT_ENVINFO_KEYSET_DECRYPT
each time you need it.
Using a crypto device to perform the decryption is somewhat simpler since the PIN
will already have been entered after cryptDeviceOpen was called, so there’s no need
to supply it as CRYPT_ENVINFO_PASSWORD. To use a crypto device, you add
the device in place of the private key keyset:
CRYPT_ENVELOPE cryptEnvelope;
CRYPT_ATTRIBUTE_TYPE requiredAttribute;
int bytesCopied, status;
/* Create the envelope and add the crypto device and data */
cryptCreateEnvelope( &cryptEnvelope, cryptUser /* CRYPT_UNUSED */,
CRYPT_FORMAT_AUTO );
cryptSetAttribute( cryptEnvelope, CRYPT_ENVINFO_KEYSET_DECRYPT,
cryptDevice );
cryptPushData( cryptEnvelope, envelopedData, envelopedDataLength,
&bytesCopied );
/* Find out what we need to continue. Since we've told the envelope
to use a crypto device, it'll perform the decryption as soon as we
ask it to using the device, so we shouldn't have to supply anything
else */
cryptGetAttribute( cryptEnvelope, CRYPT_ATTRIBUTE_CURRENT,
&requiredAttribute );
if( requiredAttribute != CRYPT_ATTRIBUTE_NONE )
/* Error */;
cryptFlushData( cryptEnvelope );
Note how cryptGetAttribute now reports that there’s nothing further required (since
the envelope has used the private key in the crypto device to performed the
decryption), and you can continue with the de-enveloping process.
Code that can handle the use of either a private key keyset or a crypto device for the
decryption is a straightforward extension of the above:
CRYPT_ENVELOPE cryptEnvelope;
CRYPT_ATTRIBUTE_TYPE requiredAttribute;
int bytesCopied, status;
/* Create the envelope and add the keyset or crypto device and data */
cryptCreateEnvelope( &cryptEnvelope, cryptUser /* CRYPT_UNUSED */,
CRYPT_FORMAT_AUTO );
cryptSetAttribute( cryptEnvelope, CRYPT_ENVINFO_KEYSET_DECRYPT,
cryptKeysetOrDevice );
cryptPushData( cryptEnvelope, envelopedData, envelopedDataLength,
&bytesCopied );
Digitally Signed Enveloping 75
/* Get the label for the private key and obtain the required
password from the user */
cryptGetAttributeString( cryptEnvelope,
CRYPT_ENVINFO_PRIVATEKEY_LABEL, label, &labelLength );
label[ labelLength ] = '\0';
getPassword( label, password, &passwordLength );
/* Add the data size information and data, wrap up the processing, and
pop out the processed data */
cryptSetAttribute( cryptEnvelope, CRYPT_ENVINFO_DATASIZE,
messageLength );
cryptPushData( cryptEnvelope, message, messageLength, &bytesCopied );
cryptFlushData( cryptEnvelope );
cryptPopData( cryptEnvelope, envelopedData, envelopedDataBufferSize,
&bytesCopied );
cryptDestroyEnvelope( cryptEnvelope );
The signature key could be a native cryptlib key, but it could also be a key from a
crypto device such as a smart card or Fortezza card. They both work in the same way
for signing data.
76 Advanced Enveloping
The Java version of the signed enveloping process (for C# replace the .length with
.Length) is:
int cryptEnvelope = crypt.CreateEnvelope( cryptUser
/* crypt.UNUSED */, crypt.FORMAT_CRYPTLIB );
/* Add the data size information and data, wrap up the processing, and
pop out the processed data */
crypt.SetAttribute( cryptEnvelope, crypt.ENVINFO_DATASIZE,
message.length );
int bytesCopied = crypt.PushData( cryptEnvelope, message );
crypt.FlushData( cryptEnvelope );
bytesCopied = crypt.PopData( cryptEnvelope, envelopedData,
envelopedData.length );
crypt.DestroyEnvelope( cryptEnvelope );
' Add the data size information and data, wrap up the processing,
' and pop out the processed data
cryptSetAttribute cryptEnvelope, CRYPT_ENVINFO_DATASIZE, messageLength
cryptPushData cryptEnvelope, message, messageLength, bytesCopied
cryptFlushData cryptEnvelope
cryptPopData cryptEnvelope, envelopedData, envelopedDataBufferSize, _
bytesCopied
cryptDestroyEnvelope cryptEnvelope
When cryptlib signs the data in the envelope, it will hash it with the algorithm
specified with the CRYPT_OPTION_ENCR_HASH option. If you want to change
the hashing algorithm which is used, you can set the CRYPT_OPTION_ENCR_-
HASH attribute for the envelope (or as a global configuration option) to the algorithm
type you want, as described in “Working with Configuration Options” on page 287.
Alternatively, you can push a hash context into the envelope before you push in a
signature key, in which case cryptlib will associate the signature key with the last
hash context you pushed in.
If you’re worried about some obscure (and rather unlikely) attacks on private keys,
you can enable the CRYPT_OPTION_MISC_SIDECHANNELPROTECTION
option as explained in “Working with Configuration Options” on page 287.
As with public-key based enveloping, verifying the signed data requires a different
key for this part of the operation, in this case a public key or key certificate. In the
simplest case if you know in advance which public key is required to verify the
signature, you can add it to the envelope in the same way as with the other envelope
types:
CRYPT_ENVELOPE cryptEnvelope;
int bytesCopied;
/* Add the enveloped data and the signature check key required to
verify the signature, and pop out the recovered message */
cryptPushData( cryptEnvelope, envelopedData, envelopedDataLength,
&bytesCopied );
cryptFlushData( cryptEnvelope );
cryptSetAttribute( cryptEnvelope, CRYPT_ENVINFO_SIGNATURE,
sigCheckKeyContext );
cryptPopData( cryptEnvelope, message, messageBufferSize,
&bytesCopied );
Digitally Signed Enveloping 77
cryptDestroyEnvelope( cryptEnvelope );
Although this leads to very simple code, it’s somewhat awkward since you may not
know in advance which public key or key certificate is required to verify the
signature on the message. To make the signature verification process easier, cryptlib
provides the ability to automatically fetch signature verification keys from a public-
key keyset for you, so that instead of supplying a public key or key certificate, you
add a public-key keyset object before you start de-enveloping and cryptlib will take
care of obtaining the key for you. This option works as follows:
create the envelope;
add the signature check keyset;
push signed data into the envelope;
pop plain data from the envelope;
if( required resource = signature check key )
read signature verification result;
/* Push in the signed data and pop out the recovered message */
cryptPushData( cryptEnvelope, envelopedData, envelopedDataLength,
&bytesCopied );
cryptFlushData( cryptEnvelope );
cryptPopData( cryptEnvelope, message, messageBufferSize,
&bytesCopied );
The same process in Java (for C# replace the .length with .Length) is:
/* Create the envelope and add the signature check keyset */
int cryptEnvelope = crypt.CreateEnvelope( cryptUser
/* crypt.UNUSED */, crypt.FORMAT_AUTO );
crypt.SetAttribute( cryptEnvelope, crypt.ENVINFO_KEYSET_SIGCHECK,
sigCheckKeyset );
/* Push in the signed data and pop out the recovered message */
int bytesCopied = crypt.PushData( cryptEnvelope, envelopedData );
crypt.FlushData( cryptEnvelope );
bytesCopied = crypt.PopData( cryptEnvelope, message, message.length );
' Create the envelope and add the signature check keyset
cryptCreateEnvelope cryptEnvelope, cryptUser, CRYPT_FORMAT_AUTO
cryptSetAttribute cryptEnvelope, CRYPT_ENVINFO_KEYSET_SIGCHECK, _
sigCheckKeyset
' Push in the signed data and pop out the recovered message
cryptPushData cryptEnvelope, envelopedData, envelopedDataLength, _
bytesCopied
cryptPopData cryptEnvelope, message, messageBufferSize, bytesCopied
The signature result will typically be CRYPT_OK (the signature verified), CRYPT_-
ERROR_SIGNATURE (the signature did not verify), or CRYPT_ERROR_-
NOTFOUND (the key needed to check the signature wasn’t found in the keyset).
Most signed data in use today uses a format popularised in S/MIME that includes the
signature verification key with the data being signed as a certificate chain. For this
type of data you don’t need to provide a signature verification key, since it’s already
included with the signed data. Details on creating and processing data in this format
is given in “S/MIME Enveloping” on page 82.
/* Add the data size information and data, wrap up the processing, and
pop out the processed data */
cryptSetAttribute( cryptEnvelope, CRYPT_ENVINFO_DATASIZE,
messageLength );
cryptPushData( cryptEnvelope, message, messageLength, &bytesCopied );
cryptFlushData( cryptEnvelope );
cryptPopData( cryptEnvelope, envelopedData, envelopedDataBufferSize,
&bytesCopied );
cryptDestroyEnvelope( cryptEnvelope );
In this case either of the two passwords can be used to decrypt the data. This can be
extended indefinitely, so that 5, 10, 50, or 100 passwords could be used (of course
with 100 different passwords able to decrypt the data, it’s questionable whether it’s
worth the effort of encrypting it at all, however this sort of multi-user encryption
could be useful for public-key encrypting messages sent to collections of people such
as mailing lists). The same applies for public-key enveloping, in fact the various
encryption types can be mixed if required so that (for example) either a private
decryption key or a password could be used to decrypt data.
Similarly, an envelope can have multiple signatures applied to it:
CRYPT_ENVELOPE cryptEnvelope;
int bytesCopied
/* Add the data size information and data, wrap up the processing, and
pop out the processed data */
cryptSetAttribute( cryptEnvelope, CRYPT_ENVINFO_DATASIZE,
messageLength );
cryptPushData( cryptEnvelope, message, messageLength, &bytesCopied );
cryptFlushData( cryptEnvelope );
cryptPopData( cryptEnvelope, envelopedData, envelopedDataBufferSize,
&bytesCopied );
cryptDestroyEnvelope( cryptEnvelope );
Enveloping with Multiple Attributes 79
In this case the envelope will be signed by both keys. As with password-based
enveloping, this can also be extended indefinitely to allow additional signatures on
the data, although it would be somewhat unusual to place more than one or two
signatures on a piece of data.
When de-enveloping data that has been enveloped with a choice of multiple
attributes, cryptlib builds a list of the attributes required to decrypt or verify the
signature on the data, and allows you to query the required attribute information and
choose the one you want to work with.
Processing Multiple De-enveloping Attributes
The attributes required for de-enveloping are managed through the use of an attribute
cursor as described in “Attribute Lists and Attribute Groups” on page 42. You can
use the attribute cursor to determine which attribute is required for the de-enveloping
process. Once you’re iterating through the attributes, all that’s left to do is to plug in
the appropriate handler routines to manage each attribute requirement that could be
encountered. As soon as one of the attributes required to continue is added to the
envelope, cryptlib will delete the required-attribute list and continue, so the attempt to
move the cursor to the next entry in the list will fail and the program will drop out of
the processing loop. For example to try a password against all of the possible
passwords that might decrypt the message that was enveloped above you would use:
int status
This steps through each required attribute in turn and tries the supplied password to
see if it matches. As soon as the password matches, the data can be decrypted, and
we drop out of the loop and continue the de-enveloping process.
De-enveloping a public-key encrypted envelope works identically, except that you’d
use the CRYPT_ENVINFO_PRIVATEKEY attribute at each step instead of the
CRYPT_ENVINFO_PASSWORD attribute (as discussed in “Public-Key Encrypted
Enveloping” on page 71 though, it’s much easier to push in a decryption keyset and
have cryptlib perform the key management for you than to explicitly add the private
key yourself).
To extend this a bit further, let’s assume that the data could be enveloped using a
password or a public key (requiring a private decryption key to decrypt it, either one
from a keyset or a crypto device such as a smart card or Fortezza card). The code
inside the loop above then becomes:
80 Advanced Enveloping
CRYPT_ATTRIBUTE_TYPE requiredAttribute;
This steps through each signature in turn and reads the result of the signature
verification for that signature, stopping when an invalid signature is found or when all
signatures are processed.
Nested Envelopes
Sometimes it may be necessary to apply multiple levels of processing to data, for
example you may want to both sign and encrypt data. cryptlib allows enveloped data
to be arbitrarily nested, with each nested content type being either further enveloped
Nested Envelopes 81
data or (finally) the raw data payload. For example to sign and encrypt data you
would do the following:
create the envelope;
add the signature key;
push in the raw data;
pop out the signed data;
destroy the envelope;
This nesting process can be extended arbitrarily with any of the cryptlib content
types.
Since cryptlib’s enveloping isn’t sensitive to the content type (that is, you can push in
any type of data and it’ll be enveloped in the same way), you need to notify cryptlib
of the actual content type being enveloped if you’re using nested envelopes. You can
set the content type being enveloped using the CRYPT_ENVINFO_-
CONTENTTYPE attribute, giving as value the appropriate CRYPT_CONTENT_-
type. For example to specify that the data being enveloped is signed data you would
use:
cryptSetAttribute( cryptEnvelope, CRYPT_ENVINFO_CONTENTTYPE,
CRYPT_CONTENT_SIGNEDDATA );
The default content type is plain data, so if you don’t explicitly set a content type
cryptlib will assume it’s just raw data. The other content types are described in
“Other Certificate Object Extensions” on page 267.
Using the nested enveloping example shown above, the full enveloping procedure
would be:
create the envelope;
add the signature key;
(cryptlib sets the content type to the default 'plain data')
push in the raw data;
pop out the signed data;
destroy the envelope;
This will mark the innermost content as plain data (the default), the next level as
signed data, and the outermost level as encrypted data.
Unwrapping nested enveloped data is the opposite of the enveloping process. For
each level of enveloped data, you can obtain its type (once you’ve pushed enough of
it into the envelope to allow cryptlib to decode it) by reading the CRYPT_-
ENVINFO_CONTENTTYPE attribute:
CRYPT_CONTENT_TYPE contentType;
S/MIME
S/MIME is a standard format for transferring signed, encrypted, or otherwise
processed data as a MIME-encoded message (for example as email or embedded in a
web page). The MIME-encoding is only used to make the result palatable to mailers,
it’s also possible to process the data without the MIME encoding.
The exact data formatting and terminology used requires a bit of further explanation.
In the beginning there was PKCS #7, a standard format for signed, encrypted, or
otherwise processed data. When the earlier PEM secure mail standard failed to take
off, PKCS #7 was wrapped up in MIME encoding and christened S/MIME version 2.
Eventually PKCS #7 was extended to become the Cryptographic Message Syntax
(CMS), and when that’s wrapped in MIME it’s called S/MIME version 3.
In practice it’s somewhat more complicated than this since there’s significant blurring
between S/MIME version 2 and 3 (and PKCS #7 and CMS). The main effective
difference between the two is that PKCS #7/SMIME version 2 is completely tied to
X.509 certificates, certification authorities, certificate chains, and other paraphernalia,
CMS can be used without requiring all these extras if necessary, and S/MIME version
3 restricts CMS back to requiring X.509 for S/MIME version 2 compatibility.
The cryptlib native format is CMS used in the configuration that doesn’t tie it to the
use of certificates (so it’ll work with PGP/OpenPGP keys, raw public/private keys,
and other keying information as well as with X.509 certificates). In addition to this
format, cryptlib also supports the S/MIME format which is tied to X.509 — this is
just the cryptlib native format restricted so that the full range of key management
options aren’t available. If you want to interoperate with other implementations, you
should use this format since many implementations can’t work with the newer key
management options that were added in CMS.
You can specify the use of the restricted CMS/SMIME format when you create an
envelope with the formatting specifier CRYPT_FORMAT_CMS or CRYPT_-
FORMAT_SMIME (they’re almost identical, the few minor differences are explained
in “Extra Signature Information” on page 89), which tells cryptlib to use the restricted
CMS/SMIME rather than the (default) unrestricted CMS format. You can also use
the format specifiers with cryptExportKeyEx and cryptCreateSignatureEx (which
take as their third argument the format specifier) as explained in “Exchanging Keys”
on page 202, and “Signing Data” on page 208.
S/MIME Enveloping
Although it’s possible to use the S/MIME format directly with the mid-level signature
and encryption functions, S/MIME requires a considerable amount of extra
processing above and beyond that required by cryptlib’s default format, so it’s easiest
to let cryptlib take care of this extra work for you by using the enveloping functions
to process S/MIME data.
To create an envelope that uses the S/MIME format, call cryptCreateEnvelope as
usual but specify a format type of CRYPT_FORMAT_SMIME instead of the usual
CRYPT_FORMAT_CRYPTLIB:
CRYPT_ENVELOPE cryptEnvelope;
/* Perform enveloping */
cryptDestroyEnvelope( cryptEnvelope );
Creating the envelope in this way restricts cryptlib to using the standard X.509-based
S/MIME data format instead of the more flexible data format which is used for
envelopes by default. In addition for backwards-compatibility with existing
implementations cryptlib doesn’t use authenticated encryption as it would for
standard cryptlib envelopes. This means that when you envelope data with
S/MIME Enveloping 83
/* Add the data size information and data, wrap up the processing, and
pop out the processed data */
cryptSetAttribute( cryptEnvelope, CRYPT_ENVINFO_DATASIZE,
messageLength );
cryptPushData( cryptEnvelope, message, messageLength, &bytesCopied );
cryptFlushData( cryptEnvelope );
cryptPopData( cryptEnvelope, envelopedData, envelopedDataBufferSize,
&bytesCopied );
cryptDestroyEnvelope( cryptEnvelope );
Since the certificate will originally come from a keyset, a simpler alternative to
reading the certificate yourself and explicitly adding it to the envelope is to let
cryptlib do it for you by first adding the keyset to the envelope and then specifying
the email address of the recipient or recipients of the message with the CRYPT_-
ENVINFO_RECIPIENT attribute:
CRYPT_ENVELOPE cryptEnvelope;
int bytesCopied;
/* Add the data size information and data, wrap up the processing, and
pop out the processed data */
cryptSetAttribute( cryptEnvelope, CRYPT_ENVINFO_DATASIZE,
messageLength );
cryptPushData( cryptEnvelope, message, messageLength, &bytesCopied );
cryptFlushData( cryptEnvelope );
cryptPopData( cryptEnvelope, envelopedData, envelopedDataBufferSize,
&bytesCopied );
cryptDestroyEnvelope( cryptEnvelope );
The same thing in Java (for C# replace the .length with .Length) is:
int cryptEnvelope = crypt.CreateEnvelope( cryptUser
/* crypt.UNUSED */, crypt.FORMAT_SMIME );
/* Add the data size information and data, wrap up the processing, and
pop out the processed data */
crypt.SetAttribute( cryptEnvelope, crypt.ENVINFO_DATASIZE,
message.length );
int bytesCopied = crypt.PushData( cryptEnvelope, message );
crypt.FlushData( cryptEnvelope );
bytesCopied = crypt.PopData( cryptEnvelope, envelopedData,
envelopedData.length );
crypt.DestroyEnvelope( cryptEnvelope );
' Add the data size information and data, wrap up the processing,
' and pop out the processed data
cryptSetAttribute cryptEnvelope, CRYPT_ENVINFO_DATASIZE, messageLength
cryptPushData cryptEnvelope, message, messageLength, bytesCopied
cryptFlushData cryptEnvelope
cryptPopData cryptEnvelope, envelopedData, envelopedDataBufferSize, _
bytesCopied
cryptDestroyEnvelope cryptEnvelope
For each message recipient that you add, cryptlib will look up the key in the
encryption keyset and add the appropriate information to the envelope to encrypt the
message to that person. This is the recommended way of handling public-key
encrypted enveloping, since it lets cryptlib handle the certificate details for you and
makes it possible to manage problem areas such as cases where the same email
address is present in multiple certificates of which only one is valid for message
encryption. If you want to handle this case yourself, you have to use a keyset query
to search the duplicate certificates and select the appropriate one as described in
“Handling Multiple Certificates with the Same Name” on page 149.
The encryption keyset doesn’t have to be local. If you use an HTTP keyset as
described in “HTTP Keysets” on page 140, cryptlib will fetch the required certificate
directly from the remote CA, saving you the effort of having to maintain and update a
local set of certificates. This use of HTTP keysets makes it very easy to distribute
certificates over the Internet.
De-enveloping works as for standard enveloping:
S/MIME Enveloping 85
CRYPT_ENVELOPE cryptEnvelope;
CRYPT_ATTRIBUTE_TYPE requiredAttribute;
int bytesCopied, status;
/* Create the envelope and add the private key keyset and data */
cryptCreateEnvelope( &cryptEnvelope, cryptUser /* CRYPT_UNUSED */,
CRYPT_FORMAT_AUTO );
cryptSetAttribute( cryptEnvelope, CRYPT_ENVINFO_KEYSET_DECRYPT,
privKeyKeyset );
cryptPushData( cryptEnvelope, envelopedData, envelopedDataLength,
&bytesCopied );
/* Find out what we need to continue and, if it's a private key, add
the password to recover it */
cryptGetAttribute( cryptEnvelope, CRYPT_ATTRIBUTE_CURRENT,
&requiredAttribute );
if( requiredAttribute != CRYPT_ENVINFO_PRIVATEKEY )
/* Error */;
cryptSetAttributeString( cryptEnvelope, CRYPT_ENVINFO_PASSWORD,
password, passwordLength );
cryptFlushData( cryptEnvelope );
More information on public-key encrypted enveloping, including its use with crypto
devices such as smart cards and Fortezza cards, is given in “Public-Key Encrypted
Enveloping” on page 71.
Digitally Signed Enveloping
S/MIME digitally signed enveloping works just like standard enveloping except that
the signing key is restricted to one that has a full chain of X.509 certificates (or at
least a single certificate) attached to it. For example if you wanted to sign data using
a private key contained in sigKeyContext you would use:
CRYPT_ENVELOPE cryptEnvelope;
int bytesCopied;
/* Add the data size information and data, wrap up the processing, and
pop out the processed data */
cryptSetAttribute( cryptEnvelope, CRYPT_ENVINFO_DATASIZE,
messageLength );
cryptPushData( cryptEnvelope, message, messageLength, &bytesCopied );
cryptFlushData( cryptEnvelope );
cryptPopData( cryptEnvelope, envelopedData, envelopedDataBufferSize,
&bytesCopied );
cryptDestroyEnvelope( cryptEnvelope );
When you sign data in this manner, cryptlib includes any certificates attached to the
signing key alongside the message. Although you can sign a message using a key
with a single certificate attached to it, it’s safer to use one that has a full certificate
chain associated with it because including only the key certificate with the message
requires that the recipient locate any other certificates that are required to verify the
signature. Since there’s no easy way to do this, signing a message using only a
standalone certificate can cause problems when the recipient tries to verify the
signature.
Verifying the signature on the data works slightly differently from the normal
signature verification process since the signed data already carries with it the
complete certificate chain required for verification. This means that you don’t have
to push a signature verification keyset or key into the envelope because the required
certificate is already included with the data:
86 S/MIME
CRYPT_ENVELOPE cryptEnvelope;
int bytesCopied, sigCheckStatus;
/* Push in the enveloped data and pop out the recovered message */
cryptPushData( cryptEnvelope, envelopedData, envelopedDataLength,
&bytesCopied );
cryptFlushData( cryptEnvelope );
cryptPopData( cryptEnvelope, message, messageBufferSize,
&bytesCopied );
cryptDestroyEnvelope( cryptEnvelope );
Since the certificate is included with the data, anyone could alter the data, re-sign it
with their own certificate, and then attach their certificate to the data. To avoid this
problem, cryptlib provides the ability to verify the chain of certificates, which works
in combination with cryptlib’s certificate trust manager. You can obtain the
certificate object containing the signing certificate chain with:
CRYPT_CERTIFICATE cryptCertChain;
You can work with this certificate chain as usual, for example you may want to
display the certificates and any related information to the user. At the least, you
should verify the chain using cryptCheckCert. You may also want to perform a
validity check using RTCS, revocation checking using CRLs, OCSP, or SCVP, and
any other certificate checks that you consider necessary. More details on working
with certificate chains are given in “Certificate Chains” on page 235, details on basic
signed enveloping (including its use with crypto devices like smart cards and
hardware crypto accelerators) are given in “Digitally Signed Enveloping” on page 75,
details on validity checking with RTCS are given in “Certificate Status Checking
using RTCS” on page 168, details on revocation checking with OCSP are given in
“Certificate Revocation Checking using OCSP” on page 174, and details on validity
checking with SCVP are given in “Certificate Status Checking using SCVP” on page
177. Remember to destroy the certificate chain object with cryptDestroyCert once
you’re finished with it.
Detached Signatures
So far, the signature for the signed data has always been included with the data itself,
allowing it to be processed as a single blob. cryptlib also provides the ability to
create detached signatures in which the signature is held separate from the data. This
leaves the data being signed unchanged and produces a standalone signature as the
result of the encoding process.
To specify that an envelope should produce a detached signature rather than standard
signed data, you should set the envelope’s CRYPT_ENVINFO_DETACHED-
SIGNATURE attribute to ‘true’ (any nonzero value) before you push in any data
cryptSetAttribute( cryptEnvelope, CRYPT_ENVINFO_DETACHEDSIGNATURE,
1 );
Apart from that, the creation of detached signatures works just like the creation of
standard signed data, with the result of the enveloping process being the standalone
signature (without the data attached):
CRYPT_ENVELOPE cryptEnvelope;
int bytesCopied;
/* Add the signing key and specify that we're using a detached
signature */
cryptSetAttribute( cryptEnvelope, CRYPT_ENVINFO_SIGNATURE,
sigKeyContext );
cryptSetAttribute( cryptEnvelope, CRYPT_ENVINFO_DETACHEDSIGNATURE,
1 );
/* Add the data size information and data, wrap up the processing, and
pop out the detached signature */
cryptSetAttribute( cryptEnvelope, CRYPT_ENVINFO_DATASIZE,
messageLength );
cryptPushData( cryptEnvelope, message, messageLength, &bytesCopied );
cryptFlushData( cryptEnvelope );
cryptPopData( cryptEnvelope, detachedSignature,
detachedSignatureBufferSize, &bytesCopied );
cryptDestroyEnvelope( cryptEnvelope );
Verifying a detached signature requires an extra processing step since the signature is
no longer bundled with the data. First, you need to push in the detached signature (to
tell cryptlib what to do with any following data). After you’ve pushed in the
signature and followed it up with the usual cryptFlushData to wrap up the
processing, you need to push in the data that was signed by the detached signature as
the second processing step:
CRYPT_ENVELOPE cryptEnvelope;
int bytesCopied, sigCheckStatus;
cryptDestroyEnvelope( cryptEnvelope );
Since the data wasn’t enveloped to begin with, there’s nothing to de-envelope, which
means there’s nothing to pop out of the envelope apart from the signing certificate
chain that you can obtain as before by reading the CRYPT_ENVINFO_SIGNATURE
attribute.
In case you’re not sure whether a signature includes data or not, you can query its
status by checking the value of the CRYPT_ENVINFO_DETACHEDSIGNATURE
attribute after you’ve pushed in the signature:
int isDetachedSignature;
This is useful in situations where the signed data is present separate from the
signature, or is in a non-standard format (for example an AuthentiCode signed file)
that can’t be recognised by the enveloping code.
Verifying a detached signature in this manner is a slight variation of the standard
detached signature verification process in which you first add to the envelope the
hash value for the signed data and then push in the detached signature:
CRYPT_CONTEXT hashContext;
CRYPT_ENVELOPE cryptEnvelope;
int bytesCopied, sigCheckStatus;
cryptDestroyEnvelope( cryptEnvelope );
When you push in the detached signature cryptlib will verify that the hash
information in the signature matches the hash that you’ve supplied. If the two don’t
match, cryptlib will return CRYPT_ERROR_SIGNATURE to indicate that the
signature can’t be verified using the given values. Because of this check, you must
add the hash before you push in the detached signature.
Finally, you can also create a detached signature in this manner, although it’s
probably not terribly useful to do things this way since you can just have the
enveloping code do it for you automatically:
CRYPT_CONTEXT hashContext;
CRYPT_ENVELOPE cryptEnvelope;
int bytesCopied;
/* Create the envelope, add hash and signing key, and specify that
we’re using a detached signature */
cryptCreateEnvelope( &cryptEnvelope, cryptUser /* CRYPT_UNUSED */,
CRYPT_FORMAT_AUTO );
cryptSetAttribute( cryptEnvelope, CRYPT_ENVINFO_HASH, hashContext );
cryptSetAttribute( cryptEnvelope, CRYPT_ENVINFO_SIGNATURE,
sigKeyContext );
cryptSetAttribute( cryptEnvelope, CRYPT_ENVINFO_DETACHEDSIGNATURE,
1 );
cryptDestroyContext( hashContext );
/* Create the envelope and add the signing key and signature
information */
cryptCreateEnvelope( &cryptEnvelope, cryptUser /* CRYPT_UNUSED */,
CRYPT_FORMAT_CMS );
cryptSetAttribute( cryptEnvelope, CRYPT_ENVINFO_SIGNATURE,
sigKeyContext );
cryptSetAttribute( cryptEnvelope, CRYPT_ENVINFO_SIGNATURE_EXTRADATA,
cmsAttributes );
cryptDestroyCert( cmsAttributes );
/* Add the data size information and data, wrap up the processing, and
pop out the processed data */
cryptSetAttribute( cryptEnvelope, CRYPT_ENVINFO_DATASIZE,
messageLength );
cryptPushData( cryptEnvelope, message, messageLength, &bytesCopied );
cryptFlushData( cryptEnvelope );
cryptPopData( cryptEnvelope, envelopedData, envelopedDataBufferSize,
&bytesCopied );
cryptDestroyEnvelope( cryptEnvelope );
You can also use this facility to extend or overwrite the attributes added by cryptlib.
For example if you wanted to add a security label to the data being signed, you would
add it to the CMS attribute object and add that to the envelope. cryptlib will then add
any additional required information (for example the signing time) and finally
generate the signature using the combined collection of attributes. This means that
you can fill in whatever attributes you want, and cryptlib till take care of the rest for
you.
Verifying a signature that includes this extra information works just like standard
signature verification since cryptlib handles it all for you. Just as you can obtain a
certificate chain from a signature, you can also obtain the extra signature information
from the envelope:
CRYPT_CERTIFICATE cmsAttributes;
You can now work with the signing attributes as in the same manner as standard
certificate attributes, for example you may want to display any relevant information
to the user. More details on working with these attributes are given in “Certificate
Extensions” on page 244, and the attributes themselves are covered in “Other
Certificate Object Extensions” on page 267.
90 S/MIME
Timestamping
In addition to the standard signature information which is provided by the signer,
cryptlib also supports the use of a message timestamp which is provided by an
external timestamp authority (TSA). Timestamping signed data in an envelope is
very simple and requires only the addition of a CRYPT_ENVINFO_TIMESTAMP
attribute to tell cryptlib which TSA to obtain the timestamp from. The TSA is
specified as a TSP session object as described in “Secure Sessions” on page 102. For
example to specify a TSA located at http://www.timestamp.com/-
tsa/request.cgi, you would create the TSP session with:
CRYPT_SESSION cryptSession;
You can also specify additional session information in the usual manner for cryptlib
sessions, after which you add the session to the envelope. Once you’ve added it, you
can destroy it since it’s now managed by the envelope:
cryptSetAttribute( cryptEnvelope, CRYPT_ENVINFO_TIMESTAMP,
cryptSession );
cryptDestroySession( cryptSession );
When cryptlib signs the data in the envelope, it will communicate with the TSA to
obtain a timestamp on the signature, which is then included with the other signed
data. This timestamp can be verified at a later date to prove that the envelope was
indeed signed at the indicated time.
Since communicating with a TSA over a network can be a slow process, the signature
generation may take somewhat longer than usual. When the timestamp is created
cryptlib doesn’t communicate any part of the message or any indication of its
contents to the TSA, it merely sends it the message signature information which is
then countersigned by the TSA. In this way no confidential or sensitive information
is leaked to the outside world through the timestamping process.
A time-stamped message appears the same as a standard signed message, with the
exception that the timestamp data is present as additional signature information of
type CRYPT_ENVINFO_TIMESTAMP. You can read the timestamp data in the
same way that you read other extra signature information:
CRYPT_ENVELOPE timeStamp;
The returned timestamp is a standard signed envelope object that you can check in the
usual manner, for example by verifying the signature on the timestamp data and
checking the certificates used for the timestamp signature.
92 PGP
PGP
PGP is a standard format for encrypting, signing, and compressing data. The original
format, PGP 2.x or PGP classic, has since been superseded by OpenPGP, partially
implemented in PGP 5.0 and later fully in NAI PGP, GPG, and various variations
such as the ckt builds. cryptlib can read both the PGP 2.x and OpenPGP formats,
including handling for assorted variations and peculiarities of different
implementations. As output cryptlib produces data in the OpenPGP format, which
can be read by any recent PGP implementation. Note that PGP 2.x used the patented
IDEA encryption algorithm (see “Algorithms” on page 330 for details), if you’re
using the code for commercial purposes you need to either obtain a license for IDEA
or use only the OpenPGP format (which cryptlib does by default anyway, so this
usually isn’t a concern).
You can specify the use of the PGP format when you create an envelope with the
formatting specifier CRYPT_FORMAT_PGP, which tells cryptlib to use the PGP
format rather than the (default) CMS format. cryptlib doesn’t restrict the use of PGP
envelopes to PGP keys. Any type of keys, including standard cryptlib keys and
X.509 certificates, can be used with PGP envelopes. By extension it’s also possible
to use smart cards, crypto accelerators, and Fortezza cards with PGP envelopes (as an
extreme example, it’s possible to use a Fortezza card to create a PGP envelope).
Note that the PGP format places a number of restrictions on data types, algorithms,
and keys that aren’t imposed by the PKCS #7/CMS/SMIME format. In particular you
need to be aware of the fact that some operations that are possible in CMS won’t be
possible when you’re using the same code with the PGP format. If you want the
greatest flexibility then you should use the CMS format instead of the PGP one.
PGP Enveloping
To create an envelope that uses the PGP format, call cryptCreateEnvelope as usual
but specify a format type of CRYPT_FORMAT_PGP instead of the usual
CRYPT_FORMAT_CRYPTLIB:
CRYPT_ENVELOPE cryptEnvelope;
/* Perform enveloping */
cryptDestroyEnvelope( cryptEnvelope );
Creating the envelope in this way restricts cryptlib to using the PGP data format
instead of the more flexible data format which is used for envelopes by default. This
imposes a number of restrictions on the use of envelopes that are described in more
detail in the sections that cover individual PGP enveloping types. One restriction that
applies to all enveloping types is that PGP requires the presence of the
CRYPT_ENVINFO_DATASIZE attribute before data can be enveloped. This
attribute is described in more detail in “Data Size Considerations” on page 56. If you
try to push data into an envelope without setting the CRYPT_ENVINFO_-
DATASIZE attribute, cryptlib will return CRYPT_ERROR_NOTINITED to indicate
that you haven’t provided the information which is needed for the enveloping to
proceed.
Another peculiarity of the PGP data format is that messages created by PGP
implementations tend to nest multiple layers of processing within each other, so that
decrypting a PGP-encrypted message won’t necessarily produce the original data but
a further PGP message containing compressed data, and that in turn will contain the
original data. Alternatively, there could be a layer of PGP-signed data in there as
well. In order to figure out what you’ve got to, once you’ve de-enveloped PGP data
you need to read the CRYPT_ENVINFO_CONTENTTYPE attribute as described in
“Nested Envelopes” on page 80 to see what the inner content type is and if necessary
PGP Enveloping 93
/* Add the data size information and data, wrap up the processing, and
pop out the processed data */
cryptSetAttribute( cryptEnvelope, CRYPT_ENVINFO_DATASIZE,
messageLength );
cryptPushData( cryptEnvelope, message, messageLength, &bytesCopied );
cryptFlushData( cryptEnvelope );
cryptPopData( cryptEnvelope, envelopedData, envelopedDataBufferSize,
&bytesCopied );
cryptDestroyEnvelope( cryptEnvelope );
Since the key will originally have come from a keyset, a simpler alternative to
reading the key yourself and explicitly adding it to the envelope is to let cryptlib do it
for you by first adding the keyset to the envelope and then specifying the email
address of the recipient or recipients of the message with the CRYPT_ENVINFO_-
RECIPIENT attribute:
CRYPT_ENVELOPE cryptEnvelope;
int bytesCopied;
/* Add the data size information and data, wrap up the processing, and
pop out the processed data */
cryptSetAttribute( cryptEnvelope, CRYPT_ENVINFO_DATASIZE,
messageLength );
cryptPushData( cryptEnvelope, message, messageLength, &bytesCopied );
cryptFlushData( cryptEnvelope );
cryptPopData( cryptEnvelope, envelopedData, envelopedDataBufferSize,
&bytesCopied );
cryptDestroyEnvelope( cryptEnvelope );
For each message recipient that you add, cryptlib will look up the key in the
encryption keyset and add the appropriate information to the envelope to encrypt the
message to that person. This is the recommended way of handling public-key
encrypted enveloping, since it lets cryptlib handle the key details for you and makes it
94 PGP
possible to manage problem areas such as cases where the same email address is
present for multiple keys of which only one is valid for message encryption.
De-enveloping works as for standard enveloping:
CRYPT_ENVELOPE cryptEnvelope;
CRYPT_ATTRIBUTE_TYPE requiredAttribute;
int bytesCopied, status;
/* Create the envelope and add the private key keyset and data */
cryptCreateEnvelope( &cryptEnvelope, cryptUser /* CRYPT_UNUSED */,
CRYPT_FORMAT_AUTO );
cryptSetAttribute( cryptEnvelope, CRYPT_ENVINFO_KEYSET_DECRYPT,
privKeyKeyset );
cryptPushData( cryptEnvelope, envelopedData, envelopedDataLength,
&bytesCopied );
/* Find out what we need to continue and, if it's a private key, add
the password to recover it */
cryptGetAttribute( cryptEnvelope, CRYPT_ATTRIBUTE_CURRENT,
&requiredAttribute );
if( requiredAttribute != CRYPT_ENVINFO_PRIVATEKEY )
/* Error */;
cryptSetAttributeString( cryptEnvelope, CRYPT_ENVINFO_PASSWORD,
password, passwordLength );
cryptFlushData( cryptEnvelope );
More information on public-key encrypted enveloping, including its use with crypto
devices such as smart cards, is given in “Public-Key Encrypted Enveloping” on page
71.
Digitally Signed Enveloping
PGP digitally signed enveloping works just like standard enveloping. For example if
you wanted to sign data using a private key contained in sigKeyContext you
would use:
CRYPT_ENVELOPE cryptEnvelope;
int bytesCopied;
/* Add the data size information and data, wrap up the processing, and
pop out the processed data */
cryptSetAttribute( cryptEnvelope, CRYPT_ENVINFO_DATASIZE,
messageLength );
cryptPushData( cryptEnvelope, message, messageLength, &bytesCopied );
cryptFlushData( cryptEnvelope );
cryptPopData( cryptEnvelope, envelopedData, envelopedDataBufferSize,
&bytesCopied );
cryptDestroyEnvelope( cryptEnvelope );
/* Push in the signed data and pop out the recovered message */
cryptPushData( cryptEnvelope, envelopedData, envelopedDataLength,
&bytesCopied );
cryptFlushData( cryptEnvelope );
cryptPopData( cryptEnvelope, message, messageBufferSize,
&bytesCopied );
The signature result will typically be CRYPT_OK (the signature verified), CRYPT_-
ERROR_SIGNATURE (the signature did not verify), or CRYPT_ERROR_-
NOTFOUND (the key needed to check the signature wasn’t found in the keyset).
When you sign data in the PGP format, the nested content type is always set to plain
data. This is a limitation of the PGP format that always signs data as the innermost
step, so that what’s signed is always plain data. In addition to this restriction, it’s not
possible to have more than one signer per envelope. Multiple signers requires the use
of nested envelopes, however it’s necessary to intersperse a layer of encryption or
compression between each signature pass since PGP can’t easily distinguish which
signature belongs to which signature pass. In general it’s best not to try to apply
multiple signatures to a piece of data.
Detached Signatures
So far, the signature for the signed data has always been included with the data itself,
allowing it to be processed as a single blob. cryptlib also provides the ability to
create detached signatures in which the signature is held separate from the data. This
leaves the data being signed unchanged and produces a standalone signature as the
result of the encoding process.
To specify that an envelope should produce a detached signature rather than standard
signed data, you should set the envelope’s CRYPT_ENVINFO_DETACHED-
SIGNATURE attribute to ‘true’ (any nonzero value) before you push in any data
cryptSetAttribute( cryptEnvelope, CRYPT_ENVINFO_DETACHEDSIGNATURE,
1 );
Apart from that, the creation of detached signatures works just like the creation of
standard signed data, with the result of the enveloping process being the standalone
signature (without the data attached):
CRYPT_ENVELOPE cryptEnvelope;
int bytesCopied;
/* Add the signing key and specify that we're using a detached
signature */
cryptSetAttribute( cryptEnvelope, CRYPT_ENVINFO_SIGNATURE,
sigKeyContext );
cryptSetAttribute( cryptEnvelope, CRYPT_ENVINFO_DETACHEDSIGNATURE,
1 );
/* Add the data size information and data, wrap up the processing, and
pop out the detached signature */
cryptSetAttribute( cryptEnvelope, CRYPT_ENVINFO_DATASIZE,
messageLength );
cryptPushData( cryptEnvelope, message, messageLength, &bytesCopied );
cryptFlushData( cryptEnvelope );
cryptPopData( cryptEnvelope, detachedSignature,
detachedSignatureBufferSize, &bytesCopied );
cryptDestroyEnvelope( cryptEnvelope );
with the data being signed, which is the most common case. When verifying a
detached signature, you need to use the alternative signature processing technique
that involves hashing the data yourself and then adding the hash to the envelope
rather than pushing the data into the envelope and having it hashed for you. Since
PGP hashes further information after hashing the data to be signed, you shouldn’t
complete the hashing before you push the hash context into the envelope. This is in
contrast to standard cryptlib detached signature processing which requires that you
complete the hashing before pushing the context into the envelope:
CRYPT_CONTEXT hashContext;
CRYPT_ENVELOPE cryptEnvelope;
int bytesCopied, sigCheckStatus;
/* Create the hash context and hash the signed data without completing
the hashing */
cryptCreateContext( &hashContext, cryptUser /* CRYPT_UNUSED */,
CRYPT_ALGO_SHA2 );
cryptEncrypt( hashContext, data, dataLength );
/* Tell the envelope that the hash is for a detached signature, then
add the hash and follow it with the detached signature */
cryptSetAttribute( cryptEnvelope, CRYPT_ENVINFO_DETACHEDSIGNATURE,
1 );
cryptSetAttribute( cryptEnvelope, CRYPT_ENVINFO_HASH, hashContext );
cryptPushData( cryptEnvelope, detachedSignature,
detachedSignatureBufferSize, &bytesCopied );
cryptFlushData( cryptEnvelope );
cryptDestroyContext( hashContext );
cryptDestroyEnvelope( cryptEnvelope );
When you push in the detached signature cryptlib will verify that the hash
information in the signature matches the hash that you’ve supplied. If the two don’t
match, cryptlib will return CRYPT_ERROR_SIGNATURE to indicate that the
signature can’t be verified using the given values. Because of this check, you must
add the hash before you push in the detached signature.
S/MIME email 97
S/MIME email
MIME is the Internet standard for communicating complex data types via email, and
provides for tagging of message contents and safe encoding of data to allow it to pass
over data paths that would otherwise damage or alter the message contents. Each
MIME message has a top-level type, subtype, and optional parameters. The top-level
types are application, audio, image, message, multipart, text, and
video.
Most of the S/MIME secured types have a content type of application/pkcs7-
mime, except for detached signatures that have a content type of
application/pkcs7-signature. The content type usually also includes an
additional smime-type parameter whose value depends on the S/MIME type and is
described in further detail below. In addition it’s usual to include a content-
disposition field whose value is also explained below.
Since MIME messages are commonly transferred via email and this doesn’t handle
the binary data produced by cryptlib’s enveloping, MIME also defines a means of
encoding binary data as text. This is known as content-transfer-encoding.
Data
The innermost, plain data content should be converted to canonical MIME format and
have a standard MIME header which is appropriate to the data content, with optional
encoding as required. For the most common type of content (plain text), the header
would have a content-type of text/plain, and possibly optional extra information
such as a content transfer encoding (in this case quoted-printable), content
disposition, and whatever other MIME headers are appropriate. This formatting is
normally handled for you by the mailer code or software interface to the mail system
you’re using.
Signed Data
For signed data the MIME type is application/pkcs7-mime, the smime-type
parameter is signed-data, and the extensions for filenames specified as
parameters is .p7m. A typical MIME header for signed data is therefore:
Content-Type: application/pkcs7-mime; smime-type=signed-data;
name=smime.p7m
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=smime.p7m
Detached Signature
Detached signatures represent a special instance of signed data in which the data to be
signed is carried as one MIME body part and the signature is carried as another body
part. The message is encoded as a multipart MIME message with the overall message
98 From Envelopes to email
--boundary
Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
signed text
--boundary
Content-Type: application/pkcs7-signature; name=smime.p7s
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=smime.p7s
encoded signature
--boundary—
Encrypted Data
For encrypted data the MIME type is application/pkcs7-mime, the smime-
type parameter is enveloped-data, and the extension for filenames specified as
parameters is .p7m. A typical MIME header for encrypted data is therefore:
Content-Type: application/pkcs7-mime; smime-type=enveloped-data;
name=smime.p7m
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=smime.p7m
Nested Content
Unlike straight CMS nested content, S/MIME nested content requires a new level of
MIME encoding for each nesting level. For the minimum level of nesting (straight
signed or encrypted data) you need to first MIME-encode the plain data, then
envelope it to create CMS signed or encrypted data, and then MIME-encode it again.
For the typical case of signed, encrypted data you need to MIME-encode, sign,
MIME-encode again, encrypt, and then MIME-encode yet again (rumours that
S/MIME was designed by a consortium of network bandwidth vendors and disk drive
manufacturers are probably unfounded).
Since the nesting information is contained in the MIME headers, you don’t have to
specify the nested content type using CRYPT_ENVINFO_CONTENTTYPE as you
do with straight CMS enveloped data (this is one of the few actual differences
between CRYPT_FORMAT_CMS and CRYPT_FORMAT_SMIME), cryptlib will
automatically set the correct content type for you. Conversely, you need to use the
MIME header information rather than CRYPT_ENVINFO_CONTENTTYPE when
de-enveloping data (this will normally be handled for you by the mailer code or
software interface to the mail system you’re using).
PGP email
Traditionally, PGP has employed its own email encapsulation format that predates
MIME and isn’t directly compatible with it. A PGP message is delimited with the
string -----BEGIN PGP MESSAGE----- and -----END PGP MESSAGE--
Implementing S/MIME and PGP email using cryptlib 99
---, with the (binary) message body present in base64-encoded format between the
delimiters. The body is followed by a base64-encoded CRC24 checksum calculated
on the message body before base64-encoding. In addition the body may be preceded
by one or more lines of type-and-value pairs containing additional information such
as software version information, and separated from the body by a blank line. More
details on the format are given in the PGP standards documents.
An example of a PGP email message is:
-----BEGIN PGP MESSAGE-----
Version: cryptlib 3.1
message body
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: cryptlib 3.1
base64-encoded signature
base64-encoded CRC24 checksum
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
The example above shows another use for the type-and-value lines, in this case to
indicate the hashing algorithm used in the signature to allow one-pass processing of
the message.
In addition to the traditional PGP format, there exists a mechanism for encapsulating
the traditional PGP format in an additional layer of MIME wrapping. This isn’t true
MIME message handling since it merely wraps MIME headers around the existing
PGP email encapsulation rather than using the full MIME capabilities directly as does
S/MIME. This format is almost never used, with software expected to use the
traditional PGP format instead. If you need more information about PGP/MIME, you
can find it in the PGP standards documentation.
types used in S/MIME or PGP), the subtype member contains the MIME subtype,
the parameter list contains any required parameters, and the
contents.binary member contains outgoing binary data straight from the
cryptlib envelope (c-client will perform any necessary encoding such as base64 if
required). All of this information is converted into an appropriately-formatted MIME
message by c-client before transmission.
Since IMAP supports the fetching of individual MIME body parts from a server,
contents.binary can’t be used to access incoming message data since only the
header information may have been fetched, with the actual content still residing on
the server. To fetch a particular body part, you need to use mail_fetchbody. If
the body part is base64-encoded (denoted by the encoding member of the BODY
having the value ENCBASE64) then you also need to call rfc822_base64 to
decode the data so cryptlib can process it. In the unlikely event that the binary data is
encoded as quoted-printable (denoted by ENCQUOTEDPRINTABLE, at least one
broken mailer occasionally does this) you need to call rfc822_qprint instead. In
either case the output can be pushed straight into a cryptlib envelope.
Eudora
Eudora handles MIME content types through plug-in translators that are called
through two functions, ems_can_translate and ems_translate_file.
Eudora calls ems_can_translate with an emsMIMEtype parameter that
contains information on the MIME type contained in the message. If this is an
S/MIME or PGP type (for example application/pkcs7-mime) the function
should return EMSR_NOW to indicate that it can process this MIME type, otherwise is
returns EMSR_CANT_TRANSLATE.
Once the translator has indicated that it can process a message, Eudora calls
ems_translate_file with input and output files to read the data from and write
the processed result to. The translation is just the standard cryptlib enveloping or de-
enveloping process depending on whether the translator is an on-arrival or on-display
one (used for de-enveloping incoming messages) or a Q4-transmission or Q4-
completion one (used for enveloping outgoing messages).
MAPI
MAPI (Microsoft’s mail API) defines two types of mailer extensions that allow
cryptlib-based S/MIME and PGP functionality to be added to Windows mail
applications. The first type is a spooler hook or hook provider, which can be called
on delivery of incoming messages and on transmission of outgoing messages. The
second type is a preprocessor, which is less useful and operates on outgoing messages
only. The major difference between the two in terms of implementation complexity
is that hook providers are full (although simple) MAPI service providers while pre-
processors are extensions to transport providers (that is, if you’ve already written a
transport provider you can add the preprocessor without too much effort; if you don’t
have a transport provider available, it’s quite a bit more work). In general it’s
probably easiest to use a single spooler hook to handle inbound and outbound
messages. You can do this by setting both the HOOK_INBOUND and
HOOK_OUTBOUND flags in the hook’s PR_RESOURCE_FLAGS value.
Messages are passed to hooks via ISpoolerHook::OutboundMsgHook (for
outgoing messages) and ISpoolerHook::InboundMsgHook (for incoming
messages). The hook implementation itself is contained in a DLL that contains the
HPProviderInit entry point and optional further entry points used to configure it,
for example a message service entry point for program-based configuration and a
WIZARDENTRY for user-based configuration.
Windows Shell
Windows allows a given MIME content type to be associated with an application to
process it. You can set up this association by calling MIMEAssociationDialog
and setting the MIMEASSOCDLG_FL_REGISTER_ASSOC flag in the
Implementing S/MIME and PGP email using cryptlib 101
dwInFlags parameter, which will (provided the user approves it) create an
association between the content type you specify in the pcszMIMEContentType
parameter and the application chosen by the user. This provides a somewhat crude
but easy to set up mechanism for processing S/MIME and PGP data using a cryptlib-
based application.
102 Secure Sessions
Secure Sessions
cryptlib’s secure session interface provides a session-oriented equivalent to envelope
objects that can be used to secure a communications link with a host or server or
otherwise communicate with another system over a network. Secure sessions can
include SSH, SSL, and TLS sessions, general request/response-style communications
sessions can include protocols such as the certificate management protocol (CMP),
simple certificate enrolment protocol (SCEP), real-time certificate status protocol
(RTCS), online certificate status protocol (OCSP), server-based certificate validation
protocol (SCVP), and timestamping protocol (TSP). As with envelopes, cryptlib
takes care of all of the session details for you so that all you need to do is provide
basic communications information such as the name of the server or host to connect
to and any other information required for the session such as a password or
certificate. cryptlib takes care of establishing the session and managing the details of
the communications channel and its security parameters.
For a secure session like SSH, SSL, and TLS, the only thing that you’ll need to do
yourself is provide information to let cryptlib verify the identity of the server that
you’re connecting to or the client that’s connecting to you, see “Verifying Session
Security Information” on page 126 for details on how to do this.
Secure sessions are very similar to envelopes, with the main difference being that
while an envelope is a pure data object into which you can push data and pop the
processed form of the same data, a session is a communications object into which you
push data and then pop data that constitutes a response from a remove server or
client. This means that a session object can be viewed as a bottomless envelope
through which you can push or pop as much data as the other side can accept or
provide.
As with an envelope, you use a session object by adding to it action objects and
resources such as user names and passwords that control the interaction with the
remote server or client and then push in data intended for the remote system and pop
out data coming from the remote system. For example to connect to a server using
SSH and obtain a directory of files using the ls command you would do the
following:
create the session;
add the server name, user name, and password;
(add server verification information if available);
activate the session;
push data "ls";
pop the result of the ls command;
destroy the session
That’s all that’s necessary. Since you’ve added a user name and password, cryptlib
knows that it should establish an encrypted session with the remote server and log on
using the given user name and password. From then on all data which is exchanged
with the server is encrypted and authenticated using the SSH protocol.
Creating an SSH server session is equally simple. In this case all you need is the
server key:
create the session;
add the server key;
activate the session;
pop client data;
push server response;
destroy the session
When you activate the session, cryptlib will listen for an incoming connection from a
client and return once a secure connection has been negotiated, at which point
communication proceeds as before.
Creating/Destroying Session Objects 103
cryptDestroySession( cryptSession );
CRYPT_SESSION cryptSession;
cryptDestroySession( cryptSession );
Since cryptlib streams data through the session object, the internal buffer size doesn’t
limit how much data you can push and pop (for example you could push 1 MB of
data into a session object with a 32 kB internal buffer), the only reason you’d want to
change the size is to provide tighter control over memory usage by session objects.
Unless you’re absolutely certain that the other side will only send very small data
quantities, you shouldn’t shrink the buffer below the default size set by cryptlib since
the protocols that cryptlib implements have certain fixed bounds on packet sizes that
need to be met, making the buffer too small would make it impossible to process data
being sent by the other side.
Note that the CRYPT_SESSION is passed to cryptCreateSession by reference as the
function modifies it when it creates the session. In all other routines in cryptlib,
CRYPT_SESSION is passed by value.
Server Names/URLs
Server names can be given using IP addresses (in dotted-decimal form for IPv4 or
colon-delimited form for IPv6), DNS names, or full URLs, with optional ports and
other information provided in the usual manner. You can specify the server name or
URL using the CRYPT_SESSINFO_SERVER_NAME attribute and the port (if
you’re not using the default port fro the protocol and it isn’t already specified in the
URL) using the CRYPT_SESSINFO_SERVER_PORT attribute. For example to
specify a connection to the server www.server.com on port 80 you would use:
cryptSetAttributeString( cryptSession, CRYPT_SESSINFO_SERVER_NAME,
"www.server.com", 14 );
cryptSetAttribute( cryptSession, CRYPT_SESSINFO_SERVER_PORT, 80 );
Since this is a web server for which port 80 is the default port, you could also use the
more common:
cryptSetAttributeString( cryptSession, CRYPT_SESSINFO_SERVER_NAME,
"http://www.server.com", 20 );
SSL and TLS use a predefined port and are often used in conjunction with HTTP, so
you can specify these URLs with or without the http:// or https:// schema
prefixes. SSH similarly uses a predefined port and can be used with or without the
ssh://, scp://, or sftp:// schema prefixes. All of these protocols allow you
to specify user information before the host name, separated with an ‘@’ sign. For
example to connect as “user” to the SSH server ssh.server.com you could use:
cryptSetAttributeString( cryptSession, CRYPT_SESSINFO_SERVER_NAME,
"ssh://[email protected]", 25 );
which saves having to explicitly specify the user name with the CRYPT_-
SESSINFO_USERNAME attribute.
All of the PKI protocols use HTTP as their transport mechanism, so cryptlib will
automatically default to using HTTP transport whether you include the http://
schema specifier or not. The CMP and TSP protocols also have alternative,
deprecated transport mechanisms identified by cmp://… (for CMP) and tcp://…
(for TSP) instead of http://…. These are occasionally used by CAs or timestamp
servers, you may need to use these instead of the HTTP default.
Server Private Keys
Most server sessions require the use of a private key in one form or another to decrypt
data from the client or sign responses returned to the client. The server key is
typically stored in a private key file, but for extra security may be held in a crypto
device such as a crypto coprocessor or accelerator. In addition, for most session
types the server key needs to be associated with a certificate or certificate chain
leading up to a trusted root certificate, so that you can’t use just a raw private key as
the server key. You can obtain the required certificate or certificate chain by creating
it yourself using cryptlib or by obtaining it from a commercial CA (it’s generally
much cheaper and easier to create it yourself than to obtain one from a third-party
CA).
When you create or obtain the certificate for your server, you may need to specify the
server name in the common name field of the certificate (how to create your own
certificate is explained in “Certificates and Certificate Management” on page 154).
For example if your server was www.companyname.com then the certificate for the
server would contain this as its common name component (you can actually put in
anything you like as the common name component, but this will result in some web
browsers that use your server displaying a warning message when they connect).
106 Secure Sessions
SSH server sessions require a raw RSA (or optionally DSA for SSHv2) key, although
you can also use one with a certificate or certificate chain attached. All other session
types require one with certificate(s) attached. You add the server key as the
CRYPT_SESSINFO_PRIVATEKEY attribute, for example to use a private key held
in a crypto device as the server key you would use:
CRYPT_CONTEXT privateKey;
Note that, as with envelopes, the private key object can be destroyed as soon as it’s
added to the session, since the session maintains its own copy of the object internally.
If you’re worried about some obscure (and rather unlikely) attacks on private keys,
you can enable the CRYPT_OPTION_MISC_SIDECHANNELPROTECTION
option as explained in “Working with Configuration Options” on page 287.
Establishing a Session
Much of the secure session process is identical to the enveloping process, so you
should familiarise yourself with the general concept of enveloping as described in
“Data Enveloping” on page 53 if you haven’t already done so. The secure session
establishment process involves adding the information which is required to connect to
the remote server as a client or to establish a server, and then activating the session to
establish the secure session or wait for incoming connections. This process of
activating the session has no real equivalent for envelopes because envelopes are
activated automatically the first time data is pushed into them.
Client sessions can also be activated automatically, however the initial handshake
process which is required to activate a session with a remote server is usually lengthy
and complex so it’s generally better to explicitly activate the session under controlled
conditions and have the ability to react to errors in an appropriate manner rather than
to have the session auto-activate itself the first time that data is pushed. Server
sessions that wait for an incoming connection must be explicitly activated, which
causes them to wait for a client connection.
You can activate a session by setting its CRYPT_SESSINFO_ACTIVE attribute to
true (any nonzero value). You can also determine the activation state of a session by
reading this attribute, if it’s set to true then the session is active, otherwise it’s not
active.
Persistent Connections
Some cryptlib session types such as CMP, SCEP, RTCS, OCSP, SCVP, and TSP
provide request/response protocols rather than continuous secure sessions like SSH
and SSL/TLS. In many cases it’s possible to perform more than one request/response
transaction per session, avoiding the overhead of creating a new connection for each
transaction. To handle persistent connections for client sessions, cryptlib uses the
CRYPT_SESSINFO_CONNECTIONACTIVE attribute to indicate that the
connection is still active and is ready to accept further transactions. Transactions
after the initial one are handled in exactly the same way as the first one, except that
there’s no need to create a new session object for them:
CRYPT_SESSION cryptSession;
int connectionActive;
SSH Sessions
SSH is a secure data transfer protocol that provides confidentiality, integrity-
protection, protection against replay attacks, and a variety of other services. The SSH
server is authenticated via the server’s public key and the client is authenticated either
via a user name and password or (less frequently) a public key-based digital
signature. cryptlib supports both versions 1 and 2 of the SSH protocol, although the
obsolete version 1 is disabled by default.
The SSH protocol exhibits a design flaw (informally known as the SSH performance
handbrake) that can lead to poor performance when transferring data, which is
particularly noticeable with applications such as SFTP. Although cryptlib avoids the
handbrake, many other implementations don’t, restricting data transfer rates to as
little as one tenth of the network link speed (the actual slowdown depends on the link
characteristics and varies from one situation to another). In order to obtain the
maximum performance from SSH, you need to either use cryptlib at both ends of the
link (that is, both the client and server must be ones that avoid the performance
handbrake), or use another protocol like SSL that doesn’t have the handbrake.
SSH Client Sessions
Establishing a session with an SSH server requires adding the server name or IP
address, an optional port number if it isn’t using the standard SSH port, and the user
name and password which is needed to log on to the server via the CRYPT_-
SESSINFO_USERNAME and CRYPT_SESSINFO_PASSWORD attributes
(occasionally the server will use public-key based authentication instead of a
password, which is covered later). Once you’ve added this information, you can
activate the session and establish the connection:
CRYPT_SESSION cryptSession;
/* Add the server name, user name, and client key and activate the
session */
cryptSetAttributeString( cryptSession, CRYPT_SESSINFO_SERVER_NAME,
serverName, serverNameLength );
cryptSetAttributeString( cryptSession, CRYPT_SESSINFO_USERNAME,
username, usernameLength );
cryptSetAttribute( cryptSession, CRYPT_SESSINFO_PRIVATEKEY,
cryptPrivateKey );
cryptSetAttribute( cryptSession, CRYPT_SESSINFO_ACTIVE, 1 );
When cryptlib connects to the server, it will use the provided private key as part of
the SSH handshake to authenticate the client to the server, with the private key taking
the place of the more usual password. If you’re not sure which of the two options
you need, you can provide both and cryptlib will use the appropriate one when it
connects to the server.
SSH Server Sessions
Establishing an SSH server session requires specifying that the session is a server
session and adding the SSH server key. Once you’ve added this information you can
activate the session and wait for incoming connections:
CRYPT_SESSION cryptSession;
int bytesCopied;
Note the use of the data pop call after the activation has been completed. SSH clients
often send additional session control information such as channel requests or port
forwarding information after the session has been activated. Telling cryptlib to try
and read any additional messages that may have arrived from the client allows it to
process these requests and respond to them as appropriate. In particular, your server
shouldn’t send data to the client immediately after the session has been established
without first performing a data pop to respond to client requests, since the client may
interpret the data that you send as an (incorrect) response to its request.
Once you activate the session, cryptlib will block until an incoming client connection
arrives, at which point it will negotiate a secure connection with the client. When the
client connects, cryptlib will ask for a user name and password before it allows the
connection to proceed. The handling of the user authentication process is controlled
by the CRYPT_SESSINFO_AUTHRESPONSE attribute, by default cryptlib will
return a CRYPT_ENVELOPE_RESOURCE status when it receives the user name
and password, allowing you to verify the information before continuing. If it’s valid,
you should set the CRYPT_SESSINFO_AUTHRESPONSE attribute to true and
resume the session activation by setting the CRYPT_SESSINFO_ACTIVE response
110 Secure Sessions
To give the user the traditional three attempts at getting their name and password
right, you would run the session activation code in a loop:
int status;
When the client connects, cryptlib will calculate the current one-time password value
that the client needs to provide in order to connect and verify it against the value
provided by the client in much the same way that password-based authentication
works.
On the client side things are identical to standard password-based authentication
except that the value provided as the password is the 2FA authentication value
generated by the authenticator application rather than a fixed password.
SSH Pre-Authentication
cryptlib supports SSH pre-authentication which blocks any attempts at SSH scanning
attacks before the SSH handshake even begins. This leads to both a large attack
surface reduction on the SSH protocol and prevents potential attackers from finding
out anything about the server beyond its SSH ID string.
Pre-authentication works by using a shared secret between the client and server which
is used to authenticate the start of the SSH handshake in a challenge-response
protocol. Since no user name or other information is present at this point, there’s a
single shared secret per server rather than a unique value per user. Think of it like a
WiFi password where the pre-authentication value allows access to the WiFi network
and per-user passwords allow access to things on the network.
You can set the pre-authentication value on the client or server by setting the
CRYPT_SESSINFO_SSH_PREAUTH attribute. If you set it on the client then it’ll
use it if required by the server (if the server doesn’t use pre-authentication then the
connection will proceed as normal), if you set it on the server then it’ll reject any
attempts to connect unless the client provides the correct authentication value with its
first SSH message:
CRYPT_SESSION cryptSession;
SSH Channels
By default, cryptlib provides the most frequently-used SSH service, a direct
encrypted connection from client to server. When you establish the SSH connection,
cryptlib creates an SSH communications channel that’s used to exchange data. This
process is entirely transparent, and you don’t have to worry about it if you don’t want
to — just treat the SSH session as a secure data pipe from one system to another.
112 Secure Sessions
There are however cases where you may need to explicitly deal with SSH channels,
and that’s when you’re using special-purpose SSH facilities such as port forwarding,
subsystems, or even user-defined channel types. In this case you need to explicitly
create the special-purpose channel and add information describing its use before the
channel can be activated. This process consists of three steps, creating the channel
using the CRYPT_SESSINFO_SSH_CHANNEL attribute, specifying its type using
the CRYPT_SESSINFO_SSH_CHANNEL_TYPE attribute, and finally specifying
any optional channel arguments using the CRYPT_SESSINFO_SSH_CHANNEL_-
ARG1 and CRYPT_SESSINFO_SSH_CHANNEL_ARG2 attributes. For example to
create a channel of the default type (which is normally done automatically by
cryptlib, and that has no optional arguments) you would use:
cryptSetAttribute( cryptSession, CRYPT_SESSINFO_SSH_CHANNEL,
CRYPT_UNUSED );
cryptSetAttributeString( cryptSession,
CRYPT_SESSINFO_SSH_CHANNEL_TYPE, "session", 7 );
This value is used to uniquely identify a particular channel, but it’s only needed in the
presence of multiple channels, which are described in “SSH Multiple Channels” on
page 114.
On the server side, reading the details of a channel that’s been opened by the client
works similarly:
char channelType[ CRYPT_MAX_TEXTSIZE + 1 ];
char channelArg1[ CRYPT_MAX_TEXTSIZE + 1 ];
int channelID, channelTypeLength, channelArg1Length, status;
If you don’t specify otherwise, cryptlib will open a channel of the default type when
it connects. If you want to instead use a special-purpose SSH facility, you should
provide the information necessary for creating it before you activate the connection.
You can also open further channels after the connection has been completed, the
process is described in “SSH Multiple Channels” on page 114. If you try to specify
the use of more than one channel before the session has been activated, cryptlib will
return CRYPT_ERROR_INITED when you try to create any channel after the first
one, since it’s only possible to request further channels once the initial channel has
been successfully established.
SSH Subsystems
Alongside the default encrypted link service, SSH provides additional services such
as SFTP, an application-level file transfer protocol tunnelled over the SSH link via a
subsystem channel. If you plan to use SFTP, note the comment about the SSH
performance handbrake at the start of this section. Although cryptlib avoids this
SSH Sessions 113
Note that SFTP is not a part of the SSH protocol but constitutes an RPC mechanism
for the Posix filesystem API. Despite its name, SFTP has nothing to do with FTP but
is more an analogue of NFSv3. Implementing an SFTP client or server is equivalent
to implementing NFS, not implementing FTP.
The handling of this NFS-equivalent mechanism, and support for features such as
marshalling and unmarshalling of SFTP messages, translation of filenames, types,
and attributes, and handling of operations, is an application-specific issue outside the
scope of cryptlib. For example the SFTP open operation requires the use of a Unix-
style filename, NFS access flags, and an extended form of the Unix/Posix file flags,
which must be translated to and from the form used by the local OS or filesystem as
required.
SSH Port Forwarding
Alongside standard SSH connections and SSH subsystems, it’s also possible to
perform port-forwarding using SSH channels. Port forwarding allows you to tunnel
an arbitrary network connection over SSH to avoid having the data being sent over
the network in the clear. For example you could use this to tunnel mail (SMTP to
send, POP3 or IMAP to receive) over SSH to and from a remote host. SSH provides
two types of port forwarding, forwarding from the client to the server, identified by a
channel type of “direct-tcpip”, and forwarding from the server to the client, identified
by a channel type of “tcpip-forward”. The only one that’s normally used is client-to-
server forwarding.
For client-to-server forwarding with a channel type of “direct-tcpip”, the first channel
argument is the remote host and port that you want to forward to. For example if you
wanted to tunnel SMTP mail traffic to mailserver.com with SMTP being on port 25
(so the forwarding string would be mailserver.com:25) you would use:
CRYPT_SESSION cryptSession;
When cryptlib activates the connection, it will indicate to the remote SSH server that
it should forward data sent over the SSH link to port 25 on mailserver.com. You
can now either push data directly into the session to tunnel it to the remote server, or
create a socket to listen on port 25 on the local machine and push data received on it
into the session, creating a local to remote system port forwarding over the SSH
channel.
When cryptlib activates the connection, it will indicate to the remote SSH server that
it should forward data sent over the SSH link to port 25 on mailserver.com. You can
now either push data directly into the session to tunnel it to the remote server or
create a socket to listen on port 25 on the local machine and push data received on it
into the session, creating a local to remote system port forwarding over the SSH
channel. Note that since cryptlib isn’t a standalone SSH server it won’t open
arbitrary ports on the client and forward data over them, it’s up to the application to
obtain the data locally and push/pop it to/from the cryptlib SSH session.
Before you forward the data on the server as requested by the client, you should
check to make sure that the requested forwarding is in fact permitted. For example a
malicious user could use port forwarding to attack a machine inside your firewall by
forwarding connections through the firewall over an SSH tunnel. Because of this,
cryptlib will never open a forwarded connection by itself, but requires that you
explicitly forward the data. In other words it will indicate that port forwarding has
been requested, but will never of its own volition open and/or forward arbitrary ports
just because a client has requested it.
If you don’t want to allow the port forwarding, all you need to do is ignore the port-
forwarding channel. cryptlib’s default action is to not allow forwarded connections,
making it impossible for a client to remotely access internal machines or ports unless
you explicitly allow it.
SSH Multiple Channels
Although SSH is usually used to provide a straightforward secure link from one
system to another, it’s also possible to use it to multiplex multiple virtual sessions
across a single logical session. This is done by tunnelling multiple data channels
across the SSH link.
SSH implements this using in-band signalling, which means that control information
and data share the same link. With a single data channel (the standard case) this isn’t
a problem, but with multiple data channels control information for one channel can be
impeded by data being sent or received on another channel. For example if you need
to send or receive control information (channel close/channel open/status
information) and there’s a data transfer in progress on another channel, the control
information can’t be sent or received until the data transfer has been completed. This
is why virtually all networking protocols use out-of-band signalling, with a separate
mechanism for control signalling that can’t be impeded by data transfers on the link.
Because of the in-band signalling problem, there are a number of special-case
considerations that you need to take into account when using multiple SSH data
SSH Sessions 115
channels. The primary one is: Don’t do it. Unless you really have a strong need to
run with multiple channels, just stick to a single channel and everything will be OK.
If you really need to use multiple channels, your code will need to take some extra
steps to handle the problems caused by SSH’s in-band signalling. The standard
approach to this problem is to run the SSH implementation as a standalone service or
daemon, with a full-time thread or task dedicated to nothing but handling any control
messages that may arrive. These standalone applications are capable of opening ports
to local and remote systems, logging on users, initiating data transfers, and so on.
Since it’s probably not a good idea for cryptlib to open arbitrary ports or transfer files
without any additional checking, your application needs to explicitly manage these
control messages. This requires doing the following:
• Try and open all channels and send all control messages right after the
connect, before any data transfers are initiated. This means that the control
signalling won’t be stalled behind data signalling.
• Avoid using the session in non-blocking mode or with a very small timeout.
Using a very short timeout increases the chances of some data remaining
unwritten or unread, which will cause control information to become stalled
behind it.
• Periodically try and pop data to handle any new control messages that may
have arrived on other channels. In standalone SSH implementations that run
as services or daemons, this is handled by having a full-time thread or task
dedicated to this function. If you want to take this approach in your
application, you can use a user-supplied socket that you can wait on in your
application as described in “Network Issues” on page 130.
• Trying to perform channel control actions can result in a CRYPT_ERROR_-
INCOMPLETE status if there’s data still waiting to be read or written. This
occurs because it’s not possible to send or receive control information for
another channel until the data for the current channel has been cleared.
Since new data can arrive after you’ve cleared the existing data but before
you can send the control message, you may need to run this portion of your
code in a loop to ensure that the channel is clear so that you can send the
control information. Note that both the send and receive sides of the channel
have to be cleared to allow the control message to be sent and a response
received.
If you’ve decided that you really do need to use multiple SSH channels, you can
manage them using the CRYPT_SESSINFO_SSH_CHANNEL attribute, which
contains an integer value that uniquely identifies each channel. You can select the
channel to send on by setting this attribute before you push data, and determine the
channel that data is being received on by reading it before you pop data:
int receiveChannelID, bytesCopied;
Read and write channels are distinct, so setting the write channel doesn’t change the
read channel, which is specified in incoming data messages that arrive.
If you’re opening additional channels after the session handshake has completed, you
need to tell cryptlib when to activate the newly-created channel. To do this, you set
its CRYPT_SESSINFO_SSH_CHANNEL_ACTIVE attribute to true, which activates
the channel by sending the details to the remote system. Using the previous example
of a port-forwarding channel, if you wanted to open this additional channel after the
session had already been established you would use:
116 Secure Sessions
If you want to close one of the additional channels, you can select it in the usual
manner and then deactivate it by setting its CRYPT_SESSINFO_SSH_CHANNEL_-
ACTIVE attribute to false:
cryptSetAttribute( cryptSession, CRYPT_SESSINFO_SSH_CHANNEL,
channelID );
cryptSetAttribute( cryptSession, CRYPT_SESSINFO_SSH_CHANNEL_ACTIVE,
0 );
If you try to deactivate the last remaining channel, which corresponds to the session
itself, cryptlib will return a CRYPT_ERROR_PERMISSION status. To close the
final channel, you need to close the overall session.
SSL/TLS Sessions
SSL/TLS is a secure data transfer protocol that provides confidentiality, integrity-
protection, protection against replay attacks, and a variety of other services. The SSL
server is authenticated via a certificate, and the client isn’t authenticated (in rare
circumstances client certificates may be used, but these are usually avoided due to the
high degree of difficulty involved in working with them). Alternatively, the client
and server may be mutually authenticated via a secret-key mechanism such as a user
name and password, which avoids the need for certificates altogether. cryptlib
supports SSL version 3, TLS version 1.0 (a.k.a SSL version 3.1), TLS version 1.1
(a.k.a SSL version 3.2) and TLS version 1.2 (a.k.a. SSL version 3.3).
SSL and TLS are actually variations of the same protocol, the protocol known by the
generic term SSL is SSL v3.0 and TLS is SSL v3.1. A revision of TLS, TLS version
1.1, is SSL v3.2, and a little-supported newer version of TLS, TLS 1.2 or SSL v3.3, is
also available in some cases but contains radical changes to the cryptography
mechanisms that make it incompatible with any other version of TLS or SSL.
cryptlib will automatically negotiate the highest protocol version supported by the
other side up to and including TLS 1.1 and use that to secure the session. You can
determine which version is in use once the session has been established by reading
the CRYPT_SESSINFO_VERSION attribute, a value of 0 indicates version 3.0 or
SSL, a value of 1 indicates version 3.1 or TLS, a value of 2 indicates version 3.2 or
TLS version 1.1, and a value of 3 indicates version 3.3 or TLS version 1.2. You can
also force the use of a particular version by setting the protocol version attribute
before you activate the connection, for example you can have cryptlib function as an
SSL-only server by setting the CRYPT_SESSINFO_VERSION to 0 to indicate the
use of SSL version 3.0 rather than TLS version 3.1. A (fortunately) tiny and ever-
decreasing number of buggy servers will fail the handshake if the protocol version is
advertised as a much higher version of TLS than they support, if you receive a
handshake failure alert when you try to activate the session (as indicated by the
CRYPT_ATTRIBUTE_ERRORMESSAGE attribute) you can try forcing the use of
lower protocol versions to see if the server can handle a connect using only the older
protocol version.
Because TLS v1.2 is relatively new and incompatible with all other versions of TLS
and therefore few implementers have chosen to support it (meaning that some clients
and servers may break if they encounter a server or client that advertises this protocol
version), cryptlib by default advertises TLS v1.1 as its highest protocol level. If you
want to explicitly advertise TLS v1.2 you can set the CRYPT_SESSINFO_-
VERSION attribute to 3 before you activate the session to indicate the use of SSL
SSL/TLS Sessions 117
v3.3 or TLS v1.2 (but see the caveat above about handshake failures if you advertise
this protocol version).
SSL/TLS Client Sessions
Establishing a session with an SSL/TLS server requires adding the server name or IP
address and an optional port number if it isn’t using the standard SSL/TLS port.
Once you’ve added this information, you can activate the session and establish the
connection:
CRYPT_SESSION cryptSession;
Authenticating yourself using shared keys avoids the need for both server and client
certificates, providing strong mutual authentication for both client and server
(conventional SSL only authenticates the server using a server certificate), and
therefore a much higher level of security and protection against problems like
phishing attacks, since the server has to prove possession of the client’s credentials
before the connection can proceed.
SSL/TLS with Client Certificates
If the server that you’re connecting to requires a client certificate, you need to provide
a private key with an attached signing certificate via the CRYPT_SESSINFO_-
PRIVATEKEY attribute to authenticate yourself to the server before you activate the
session. The private key and accompanying certificate could be a native cryptlib key,
but it could also be a key from a crypto device such as a smart card or Fortezza card.
They both work in the same way for client authentication:
CRYPT_SESSION cryptSession;
/* Add the server name and client key/certificate and activate the
session */
cryptSetAttributeString( cryptSession, CRYPT_SESSINFO_SERVER_NAME,
serverName, serverNameLength );
cryptSetAttribute( cryptSession, CRYPT_SESSINFO_PRIVATEKEY,
cryptPrivateKey );
SSL/TLS Sessions 119
When cryptlib connects to the server, it will use the provided private key and signing
certificate as part of the SSL/TLS handshake to authenticate the client to the server.
If the server doesn’t require the use of a client certificate, cryptlib won’t do anything
with the private key, so it’s OK to add this even if you’re not sure whether it’ll be
needed or not.
Note that client certificates are very rarely used in practice because of the high level
of difficulty involved in working with them. If you require client authentication, a far
better solution is to use SSL with shared keys as described in the previous section,
which provides mutual cryptographic authentication of both client and server.
SSL/TLS Server Sessions
Establishing an SSL/TLS server session requires adding the server key with its
accompanying certificate, activating the session, and waiting for incoming
connections:
CRYPT_SESSION cryptSession;
Once you activate the session, cryptlib will block until an incoming client connection
arrives, at which point it will negotiate a secure connection with the client.
SSL/TLS Servers with Shared Keys
If you’re using shared keys (for example a user name and password) to provide
security, you need to provide this information via the CRYPT_SESSINFO_-
USERNAME and CRYPT_SESSINFO_PASSWORD attributes. For example if you
have a server that allows one of three users/clients to connect to it you would use:
CRYPT_SESSION cryptSession;
Using shared keys in this manner avoids the need for both server and client
certificates, providing mutual cryptographic authentication for both client and server
(conventional SSL only authenticates the server via a server certificate). This type of
authentication also detects attacks like phishing attacks, since the server has to prove
knowledge of the client’s credentials before the connection can be established.
If you have clients who need to connect without providing a user name and password,
you can still provide a server certificate in the usual manner using the CRYPT_-
SESSINFO_PRIVATEKEY attribute, and clients who don’t provide a user name and
password will connect using public-key encryption. Note though that a client that
uses the server certificate rather than a user name and password loses the benefits of
mutual client/server authentication.
Once a client has authenticated themselves using a shared key, you can determine
their identity by reading back the CRYPT_SESSINFO_USERNAME attribute:
char username[ CRYPT_MAX_TEXTSIZE + 1 ];
int usernameLength
If the attempt by the client to connect fails (typically due to the use of an incorrect
password), the password information for that user will be reset to prevent password-
guessing attacks in which an attacker repeatedly reconnects using every possible
password until they succeed. If the password is reset, you need to re-add the user and
password to the session before that particular user can connect again. In order to
protect against password-guessing attacks you should employ standard precautions
such as allowing a maximum of three incorrect attempts or inserting a time delay
before another connect attempt is allowed.
SSL/TLS Servers with Client Certificates
There are two ways to use client certificates to authenticate incoming connections,
you can either provide a public-key keyset like a database keyset for cryptlib to use to
check certificates provided by client connections or you can manually check the
client certificate yourself. When you use a public-key keyset and a client tries to
establish a connection, cryptlib will check that their certificate is present in the
keyset. If it isn’t present, the connection isn’t permitted. If you use manual checking,
cryptlib will interrupt the session activation and wait for you to check that the client’s
certificate is OK before continuing.
This provides a very fine-grained level of access control through which individual
end users can be permitted or denied access to the host. Since the keyset form of the
certificate checking uses the presence of a certificate in the keyset to verify incoming
connections, you can control who is allowed in by adding or removing their
certificate to or from the keyset. Note that you must provide a public-key keyset that
stores certificates (not a private-key keyset) to the session since SSL/TLS uses
certificates for the access control functionality.
Using manual certificate checking provides an alternative means of access control,
but requires more effort than the simple whitelist-based check that’s provided through
public-key keysets. You can use manual checking if you need to verify that a
certificate is issued by a particular CA or has particular name components or other
attributes in it.
If you’re verifying certificates using a keyset-based whitelist, you can specify the
public-key keyset to use for checking incoming connections with the
CRYPT_SESSINFO_KEYSET attribute:
CRYPT_SESSION cryptSession;
CRYPT_KEYSET cryptKeyset;
/* Add the server key and public-key keyset and activate the
session */
cryptSetAttribute( cryptSession, CRYPT_SESSINFO_PRIVATEKEY,
privateKey );
cryptSetAttribute( cryptSession, CRYPT_SESSINFO_KEYSET, cryptKeyset );
cryptSetAttribute( cryptSession, CRYPT_SESSINFO_ACTIVE, 1 );
When you set this attribute for a server session, cryptlib will require the use of client
certificates for connections to the server, and won’t allow connections from clients
that aren’t able to authenticate themselves using a certificate that was previously
added to the keyset. Once you’ve opened the keyset containing the client certificate
whitelist, you can re-use it for subsequent sessions, there’s no need to re-open it for
each new session.
If you’re verifying certificates manually, you need to tell cryptlib that you’re doing
this by setting the CRYPT_SESSINFO_TLS_OPTIONS option
CRYPT_TLSOPTION_MANUAL_CERTCHECK:
cryptSetAttribute( cryptSession, CRYPT_SESSINFO_TLS_OPTIONS,
CRYPT_TLSOPTION_MANUAL_CERTCHECK );
This tells cryptlib to request a client certificate for authentication in the same way that
setting the CRYPT_SESSINFO_KEYSET would. When the client connects, cryptlib
will request a certificate before it allows the connection to proceed. The handling of
the client authentication process is controlled by the CRYPT_SESSINFO_-
AUTHRESPONSE attribute, by default cryptlib will return a CRYPT_ENVELOPE_-
RESOURCE status when it receives the client’s certificate, allowing you to verify the
certificate before continuing. If it’s valid, you should set the CRYPT_SESSINFO_-
AUTHRESPONSE attribute to true and resume the session activation by setting the
CRYPT_SESSINFO_ACTIVE response to true again. If not, you can either set the
CRYPT_SESSINFO_AUTHRESPONSE attribute to false and resume the session
activation (which will deny the connect request), or close the session:
int status;
key/certificate for each virtual host that it supports and cryptlib will switch between
TLS virtual hosts based on what the client requests.
To enable the virtual-hosting capability through SNI, you need to set the TLS option
CRYPT_TLSOPTION_SERVER_SNI before you add the server key(s) to the
session:
cryptSetAttribute( cryptSession, CRYPT_SESSINFO_TLS_OPTIONS,
CRYPT_TLSOPTION_SERVER_SNI );
When a client connects, cryptlib will match the virtual host’s key to the one indicated
by the client’s SNI and use that one for the TLS session. If no match for the SNI is
found, it will use the default/primary server key.
/* Select WebSockets */
cryptSetAttribute( cryptSession, CRYPT_SESSINFO_TLS_SUBPROTOCOL,
CRYPT_SUBPROTOCOL_WEBSOCKETS );
If there’s a specific protocol being run over WebSockets, for example MQTT, you
can specify the protocol name using the CRYPT_SESSINFO_TLS_WSPROTOCOL
attribute (this usually isn’t needed since the other side of the tunnel typically only
implements the specific subprotocol that it’s been set up for):
cryptSetAttributeString( cryptSession, CRYPT_SESSINFO_TLS_WSPROTOCOL,
"mqtt", 4 );
Once you’ve enabled the use of WebSockets in this manner, all data sent over the
SSL/TLS connection will use the WebSockets protocol for encapsulation.
A typical flow for setting up a TLS session for EAP use is:
/* Create the session and set the RADIUS server to connect to */
cryptCreateSession( &cryptSession, cryptUser /* CRYPT_UNUSED */,
CRYPT_SESSION_TLS );
cryptSetAttributeString( cryptSession, CRYPT_SESSINFO_SERVER_NAME,
serverName, serverNameLen );
/* Select EAP-TTLS */
cryptSetAttribute( cryptSession, CRYPT_SESSINFO_TLS_SUBPROTOCOL,
CRYPT_SUBPROTOCOL_EAPTTLS );
In addition to the standard settings you may need to restrict the TLS version to TLS
1.0 since many servers won’t understand TLS 1.2 or even 1.1 and return odd errors if
newer versions of TLS are used. You may also need to disable certificate name
verification if the server is using a generic self-signed certificate or on an RFC 1918
address with a certificate that doesn’t correspond to its name or IP address:
/* Set the TLS version to TLS 1.0 and disable certificate name
verification */
cryptSetAttribute( cryptSession, CRYPT_SESSINFO_VERSION, 1 );
cryptSetAttribute( cryptSession, CRYPT_SESSINFO_TLS_OPTIONS,
CRYPT_TLSOPTION_DISABLE_NAMEVERIFY );
Once the EAP session is established, you can run whichever higher-level
authentication mechanism you’re working with over cryptlib’s EAP SSL/TLS tunnel.
As the earlier description of protocol stacking indicates, running an authentication
mechanism that consists of between five and seven protocol layers stacked on top of
each other, with several of the layers never having been designed for this, can lead to
all sorts of problems. For this reason cryptlib provides extensive diagnostics when
built and run in debug mode, printing a complete trace of messages sent and received.
You can use this debug trace, alongside debugging facilities on the server (for
example running FreeRADIUS with the -X option), to track down problems in
communicating with a RADIUS server.
Establishing an RTCS server session requires adding a database keyset that cryptlib
can query for certificate status information, specified as the CRYPT_SESSINFO_-
KEYSET attribute, and an optional RTCS responder key/certificate if you want
cryptlib to sign the responses that it provides. The database keyset would typically be
a CA certificate store as described in “Managing a Certification Authority” on page
179, but opened as a CRYPT_KEYSET_DATABASE rather than a CRYPT_-
KEYSET_DATABASE_STORE since RTCS uses the keyset purely for certificate
status information and not as a full-blown certificate store.
Once you’ve added this information you can activate the session and wait for
incoming connections:
CRYPT_SESSION cryptSession;
Once you activate the session, cryptlib will block until an incoming client connection
arrives, at which point it will read the RTCS request from the client and return a
response optionally signed with the RTCS responder key.
OCSP Server Sessions
An OCSP server session is a protocol-specific session type that returns certificate
revocation information to a client. OCSP client sessions are used for certificate
revocation checks and are described in “Certificate Revocation Checking using
OCSP” on page 168.
The difference between RTCS and OCSP is that RTCS provides real-time, live
certificate status information while OCSP provides delayed revocation information,
usually based on CRLs. In other words RTCS answers the question “Is this
certificate OK to use right now?” while OCSP answers the question “Was this
certificate revoked at some point in the past?”. OCSP can’t return true validity
information, so that if fed a freshly-issued certificate and asked “Is this a valid
certificate”, it can't say “Yes” (a CRL can only answer “revoked”), and if fed a forged
certificate it can't say “No” (it won’t be present in any CRL). In addition OCSP will
often return a status result drawn from stale information hours or even days old, while
RTCS (as the name implies) will always return real-time information. Finally, OCSP
uses a peculiar means of identifying certificates that some implementations disagree
over, with the result that a certificate may be regarded as valid even if it isn’t because
client and server are talking about different things. In contrast RTCS returns an
unambiguous yes-or-no response drawn from live certificate data. For these reasons
RTCS is the cryptlib preferred certificate status protocol.
Establishing an OCSP server session requires adding the OCSP responder
key/certificate and a database keyset that cryptlib can query for certificate status
information, specified as the CRYPT_SESSINFO_KEYSET attribute. The database
keyset would typically be a CA certificate store as described in “Managing a
Certification Authority” on page 179, but opened as a CRYPT_KEYSET_-
DATABASE rather than a CRYPT_KEYSET_DATABASE_STORE since OCSP
uses the keyset purely for certificate status information and not as a full-blown
certificate store.
Once you’ve added this information you can activate the session and wait for
incoming connections:
CRYPT_SESSION cryptSession;
Once you activate the session, cryptlib will block until an incoming client connection
arrives, at which point it will read the OCSP request from the client and return a
response signed with the OCSP responder key.
SCVP Server Sessions
An SCVP server session is a protocol-specific session type that returns certificate
validity information to a client. SCVP client sessions are used for certificate validity
checks and are described in “Certificate Status Checking using SCVP” on page 177.
The difference between RTCS and SCVP is that, while they perform the same
function, RTCS is a very lightweight protocol that provides fast certificate status
information while SCVP is an extraordinarily complex and heavyweight mechanism
for doing more or less the same thing. In particular RTCS sends a single status value,
“valid” or “not valid” while SCVP exchanges tens of kilobytes of complex data that
needs to be parsed, analysed, and processed by both client and server in order to
obtain the same result that RTCS conveys in a single value. As is standard for very
complex protocols like this, the very few implementations of SCVP that exist can
never quite agree on how some things are to be interpreted, so protocols like RTCS or
HTTP status checks are to be preferred over any use of SCVP.
Establishing an SCVP server session requires adding the SCVP CA key/certificate
and a database keyset that cryptlib can query for certificate status information,
specified as the CRYPT_SESSINFO_KEYSET attribute. The database keyset would
typically be a CA certificate store as described in “Managing a Certification
Authority” on page 179, but opened as a CRYPT_KEYSET_DATABASE rather than
a CRYPT_KEYSET_DATABASE_STORE since SCVP uses the keyset purely for
certificate status information and not as a full-blown certificate store.
Once you’ve added this information you can activate the session and wait for
incoming connections:
CRYPT_SESSION cryptSession;
Once you activate the session, cryptlib will block until an incoming client connection
arrives, at which point it will read the SCVP request from the client and return a
response signed with the SCVP CA key.
TSP Server Sessions
A TSP server session is a protocol-specific session type that returns timestamp
information to a client. TSP client sessions are used with S/MIME and are described
in “Timestamping” on page 90. Establishing a TSP server session requires adding the
timestamping authority (TSA) key/certificate, activating the session, and waiting for
incoming connections:
126 Secure Sessions
CRYPT_SESSION cryptSession;
For example if you have a known-good certificate for the server then you can make
sure that you’re connecting to the actual server that controls the certificate with:
unsigned char fingerprint[ CRYPT_MAX_HASHSIZE ];
int fingerprintSize;
Alternatively, once you’ve connected to the server you can verify its certificate or key
fingerprint by reading the CRYPT_SESSINFO_SERVER_FINGERPRINT_SHA1
attribute, which contains a fingerprint value that uniquely identifies the server’s
certificate or key. You can compare this to a stored copy of the fingerprint, or format
it for display to the user.
To get the server’s key fingerprint from the server side you can read the CRYPT_-
SESSINFO_SERVER_FINGERPRINT_SHA1 attribute from the SSH server session
after you’ve added the server’s private key, and the CRYPT_CERTINFO_-
FINGERPRINT_SHA1 attribute from the SSL/TLS server certificate.
You can also get cryptlib to perform the key checking for you automatically by
providing a whitelist of acceptable server keys stored in a database keyset. This
works for SSL/TLS certificates where you can obtain a copy of each server’s
certificate, avoiding the need to deal with CAs, certificate chain verification, trust
anchors, CRLs/OCSP, and all of the other PKI paraphernalia since only the
certificates that you explicitly allow will be permitted for SSL/TLS connections.
To use a certificate whitelist, you add all of the permitted certificates to a database
keyset and then add the keyset to the session as a CRYPT_SESSINFO_KEYSET
attribute. When cryptlib connects to the server it will compare the certificate that the
server uses to authenticate itself to the ones in the whitelist and only allow a
connection to a server whose certificate is present in the whitelist:
CRYPT_KEYSET cryptKeyset;
When you use whitelist-based checking, run a safety check to ensure that you’ve
configured your whitelist correctly by trying to connect to a server that’s not on the
whitelist and verifying that cryptlib rejects the connect attempt.
Using fingerprints for authentication is by far the most reliable of the methods
covered here, since it provides a guaranteed match to a known key that can’t be
spoofed or forged.
Authenticating the Host or Client using Certificates
In addition to providing integrity and privacy protection for a communications
session, some session protocols also provide a means of verifying that the host or
client that you’re connecting to really is who they claim to be. For everything but the
SSH protocol this authentication is performed by having the host supply a certificate
or certificate chain signed by a CA (or sometimes a self-signed certificate) which is
used during the protocol initialisation phase to establish the session. The general idea
is that the certificate contains the name of the host that you’re connecting to or the
name of the entity which is providing a particular service (for example an RTCS
responder), so you can use the returned certificate to verify that you really are
128 Secure Sessions
communicating with this host and not a machine that’s been set up by an attacker to
masquerade as the host.
In addition if you’re using SSL or TLS with client certificates, you can use the
certificate provided by the client when they connect to verify their identity. If you’re
using SSL or TLS with shared keys then you already have mutual authentication of
client and server and don’t need to bother with certificates.
When connecting to a server that uses certificates, cryptlib will automatically check
the host name (or names) given in the certificate against the host that you’re
connecting to. If the two don’t match, meaning that the certificate isn’t valid for the
given host then the activation will return CRYPT_ERROR_INVALID to indicate that
the certificate isn’t valid for this host. This situation can occur when an attacker has
substituted a fake certificate (and host) for the real one (or sometimes due to a
configuration error in which the wrong certificate is used). If you get a CRYPT_-
ERROR_INVALID status you can then read the CRYPT_ATTRIBUTE_-
ERRORMESSAGE attribute to get an explanation of what the problem was.
Once the session has been successfully activated, you can read the host or client’s
certificate chain as the CRYPT_SESSINFO_RESPONSE attribute:
CRYPT_CERTIFICATE cryptCertificate;
You can then work with the certificate chain as usual, for example you can verify it
using cryptCheckCert or fetch the subject name information as explained in
“Certificate Identification Information” on page 223. It’s important that you verify
the chain, otherwise an attacker can create (or buy from a CA) a certificate that
matches the host name that you’re connecting to, again allowing them to substitute a
fake host for the real one.
Note that in the case of a server what’s returned is a full certificate chain and not just
a single certificate. This means that the chain will contain not just an end entity
certificate but also one or more CA certificates typically leading up to a trusted root
CA certificate. You can find out more about how to work with these in “Certificate
Chains” on page 235, and in particular how to verify them in “Checking Certificate
Chains” on page 236.
In addition there is considerable confusion among CAs and implementations as to
how identity information is stored in a certificate. Because of the infinitely flexible
nature of certificates it’s possible to stash multiple conflicting identities in a
certificate, some of which may not be verified by CAs or other implementations, and
different implementations will often use different identities in their verification. This
is why cryptlib uses a keyset-based whitelist for access control with client certificates,
because then only users with pre-approved certificates are allowed access no matter
what identities the certificate contains or which CA signed them.
Authenticating the Client via Port and Address
In addition to the stronger fingerprint and certificate authentication mechanisms, you
can also determine the IP address and port that a client is connecting from if you’re
running as a server (if you’re the client, you already known which server and port
you’re connecting to). You can obtain this information by reading the CRYPT_-
SESSINFO_CLIENT_NAME and CRYPT_SESSINFO_CLIENT_PORT attributes,
which work in a similar manner to the CRYPT_SESSINFO_SERVER_NAME and
CRYPT_SESSINFO_SERVER_PORT attributes:
char name[ CRYPT_MAX_TEXTSIZE + 1 ];
int nameLength, port
Note that cryptlib returns the client’s IP address in dotted-decimal form (for IPv4) or
colon-delimited form (for IPv6) rather than its full name, since a single IP address can
be aliased to multiple names and may require complex name resolution strategies. If
you require a full name rather than an IP address you’ll need to resolve it yourself,
taking into account the multiple hostname issue, the fact that the client may be using
NAT, and the possibility of DNS spoofing.
Obtaining Session Security Parameters
If you want to know the details of the encryption mechanism that’s being used to
protect the session, you can read various CRYPT_CTXINFO_xxx attributes from the
session object, which will return information from the encryption context(s) that are
being used to secure the session. For example once you’ve activated the session you
can get the encryption algorithm, mode, and the key size being used with:
CRYPT_ALGO_TYPE cryptAlgo;
CRYPT_MODE_TYPE cryptMode;
int keySize;
Exchanging Data
Once a general-purpose secure communications session has been established, you can
exchange data with the remote client or server over the encrypted, authenticated link
that it provides. This works exactly like pushing and popping data to and from an
envelope, except that the session is effectively a bottomless envelope that can accept
or return (depending on the remote system) an endless stream of data. In many cases
the overhead involved in wrapping up a block of data and exchanging it with a remote
client or server can be noticeable, so you should always push and pop as much data at
once into and out of a session as you can. For example if you have a 100-byte
message and communicate it to the remote host as 10 lots of 10 bytes, this is much
slower than sending a single lot of 100 bytes. This behaviour is identical to the
behaviour in applications like disk I/O, where writing a single big file to disk is a lot
more efficient than writing 10 smaller files.
cryptlib helps to eliminate this problem as much as possible by not wrapping up and
dispatching session data until you explicitly tell it to by flushing the data through just
as you would with an envelope:
cryptPushData( cryptSession, data, dataSize, &bytesCopied );
cryptFlushData( cryptSession );
This means that cryptlib will accumulate as much data as possible in the session’s
internal buffer before encrypting and integrity-protecting it and sending it through to
the remote system, avoiding the inefficiency of processing and sending many small
blocks of data. Note that you only need to flush data through in this manner when
you explicitly want to force all of the data in the session buffer to be sent to the
remote system. If you don’t force a flush cryptlib handles this automatically in the
most efficient manner possible using its built-in buffering mechanisms.
When you close a session, cryptlib will immediately shut down the session as is,
without flushing data in internal session buffers. This is done to handle cases where a
130 Secure Sessions
session is aborted (for example because the user cancels the transaction or because of
a network error), and it becomes necessary to exit without sending further data. If
you want to send any remaining data before destroying the session, you need to
explicitly flush the data through before you destroy the session object (remember to
check the return status of the final flush to make sure that all of your data was indeed
sent).
Reading the response from the remote client or server works in a similar manner:
cryptPopData( cryptSession, buffer, bufferSize, &bytesCopied );
Unless you specify otherwise, all of cryptlib’s network operations are non-blocking
and near-asynchronous, waiting only the minimum amount of time for data to be sent
or received before returning to the caller (you can make this fully asynchronous if
you want, see the next section). cryptlib will provide whatever data is available from
the remote client or server or write whatever is possible to the remote client or server
and then return, which is particularly important for interactive sessions where small
amounts of data are flowing back and forth simultaneously. The amount of data
which is returned is indicated by the bytesCopied parameter. If this value is zero
then no data is available or was written at the current time. Since the interface is non-
blocking, your application can perform other processing while it waits for data to
arrive.
If you’d prefer to have cryptlib not block at all or block for a longer amount of time
when waiting for data to arrive or be sent, you can enable this behaviour as described
in “Network Issues” on page 130. With blocking network operations enabled,
cryptlib will wait for a user-defined amount of time for data to arrive before returning
to the caller. If data arrives or is sent during the timeout interval, cryptlib returns
immediately. With non-blocking behaviour it will return immediately without
waiting for data to become available.
Since cryptlib reads and writes are asynchronous, you shouldn’t assume that all the
data you’ve requested has been transferred when the push or pop returns. cryptlib
will only transfer as much data as it can before the timeout, which may be less than
the total amount. In particular if data is flowing in both directions at once (that is,
both sides are writing data and not reading it), the network buffers will eventually fill
up, resulting in no more data being written. If this happens you need to occasionally
interleave a read with the writes to drain the buffers and allow further data to be
transferred.
Network Issues
Sometimes a machine won’t connect directly to the Internet but has to access it
through a proxy. cryptlib supports common proxy servers such as socks, and also
supports HTTP proxies if the protocol being used is HTTP-based. In addition it may
be necessary to adjust other network-related parameters such as timeout values in
order to accommodate slow or congested network links or slow clients or servers.
The following sections explain how to work with the various network-related options
to handle these situations.
Secure Sessions with Proxies
Using a socks proxy requires that you tell cryptlib the name of the socks server and
an optional user name (most servers don’t bother with the user name). You can set
the socks server name with the CRYPT_OPTION_NET_SOCKS_SERVER attribute
and the optional socks user name with the CRYPT_OPTION_NET_SOCKS_-
USERNAME attribute. For example to set the socks proxy server to the host called
socks (which is the name traditionally given to socks servers) you would use:
cryptSetAttributeString( CRYPT_UNUSED, CRYPT_OPTION_NET_SOCKS_SERVER,
"socks", 5 );
before activating the session. When you activate the session, cryptlib will
communicate with the proxy using the socks protocol.
Network Issues 131
Using an HTTP proxy works in a similar manner, with the name of the proxy being
specified with the CRYPT_OPTION_NET_HTTP_PROXY attribute. Note that
HTTP proxies require that the protocol being used employs HTTP as its transport
mechanism, so they’re not used with any other protocol type.
However, it’s also possible to move SSL/TLS traffic through most types of HTTP
proxies, since SSL is frequently used to carry HTTP data. If you enable the use of an
HTTP proxy, cryptlib will also use it for SSL/TLS sessions.
Under Windows, cryptlib provides automatic proxy discovery and support. You can
enable this by setting the proxy server to [Autodetect]:
cryptSetAttributeString( CRYPT_UNUSED, CRYPT_OPTION_HTTP_PROXY,
"[Autodetect]", 12 );
which instructs cryptlib to automatically detect and use whatever proxy is being
employed. Since the proxy-discovery process can take a few seconds, you should
only enable autodetection if you’re sure that a proxy is actually present. Enabling it
unconditionally will result in cryptlib spending a lot of time trying to find a proxy that
may not exist, which slows down the network connection setup process.
Network Timeouts
When connecting to a server and carrying out other portions of a protocol such as
security parameter and session key negotiation (for which cryptlib knows that a
response must arrive within a certain time) cryptlib sets an interval timer and reports
a connect or read error if no response arrives within that time interval. This means
that if there’s a network problem such as a host being down or a network outage,
cryptlib won’t hang forever but will give up after a certain amount of time, defaulting
to 30 seconds. You can change the connect timeout value using the CRYPT_-
OPTION_NET_CONNECTTIMEOUT attribute, which specifies the connect timeout
delay in seconds. For example to set a longer timeout for a remote host or client
which is slow in responding you would use:
cryptSetAttribute( CRYPT_UNUSED, CRYPT_OPTION_NET_CONNECTTIMEOUT,
60 );
to set a one minute timeout when activating the session. If you want to set the
connect timeout for a specific session rather than system-wide for all sessions, you
can set the attribute only for the session object in question:
cryptSetAttribute( cryptSession, CRYPT_OPTION_NET_CONNECTTIMEOUT,
60 );
In addition to the connect timeout cryptlib has a separate timeout setting for network
communications, specified using the CRYPT_OPTION_NET_READTIMEOUT and
CRYPT_OPTION_NET_WRITETIMEOUT attributes. Since cryptlib session
objects normally use non-blocking I/O once the session has been established and data
is being exchanged, the read and write timeouts are set to minimal values during any
general data exchanges that occur after the connection negotiation process has
completed. This means that all communications after that point are near-
asynchronous and non-blocking, however by changing the read/write timeout settings
you can make cryptlib wait for a certain amount of time for data to arrive or be
written before returning. For example to wait up to 30 seconds for data to arrive you
would use:
cryptSetAttribute( CRYPT_UNUSED, CRYPT_OPTION_NET_READTIMEOUT, 30 );
If data arrives during the wait interval, cryptlib will return as soon as the data
becomes available, otherwise it’ll wait for up to 30 seconds for data to arrive.
As with the connect timeout, you can also apply these options directly to session
objects, which means that they’ll only apply to that particular session rather than
being a system-wide setting for all session objects:
cryptSetAttribute( cryptSession, CRYPT_OPTION_NET_READTIMEOUT, 30 );
If you need the quickest possible response (usually only interactive sessions need
this), you can set network read/write timeouts of zero, which will result in cryptlib
132 Secure Sessions
returning immediately if no data can be read or written. The downside to using a zero
timeout is that it reduces data transfers to polled I/O, requiring repeated read or write
attempts to transfer data. For write timeouts it’s better to set at least a small non-zero
timeout rather than a zero timeout to ensure that the data is successfully written. In
almost all cases the write will complete immediately even with a non-zero timeout,
only in very rare cases such as when network congestion occurs will it be necessary
to wait for data to be sent. In other words during a read wait the session is frequently
just idling waiting for something to happen, but during a write wait it’s actively trying
to move the data out, so setting a non-zero timeout will increase the chances of the
network layer moving the data out during the current write attempt rather than having
to retry the write later.
A second problem with very short timeouts occurs when you close a session. Since
writes are fully asynchronous, the network session can be closed before all of the data
is written. Although the network stack tries to flush the data through, if there’s an
error during transmission there’s no way to indicate this since the session has already
been closed. cryptlib tries to mitigate this by setting a minimum (non-zero) network
timeout when it closes a session, but there’s no way to guarantee that everything will
be sent during the timeout interval (in general this is an unsolvable problem, for
example if an intermediate router crashes and is rebooted or the routing protocols
hunt around for an alternative route, the transfer will eventually complete, but it could
take several minutes for this to happen, which would require an excessively long
timeout setting).
To avoid this issue, you should avoid writing a large amount of data with a very small
network timeout setting and then immediately closing the session. You can do this by
writing data at a measured pace (with a non-zero timeout) during the session or by
setting a reasonable write timeout before you flush the last lot of data through and
close the session.
Managing your Own Network Connections and I/O
Instead of having cryptlib automatically manage network connections, it’s possible
for you to manage them yourself. This can be useful when you want to customise
session establishment and connection management, for example to handle a
STARTTLS upgrade during an SMTP or IMAP session, an STLS upgrade during a
POP session, or an AUTH TLS upgrade during an FTP session. You can also use this
facility if you want to use any high-performance I/O capabilities provided by your
system, for example asynchronous I/O or hardware-accelerated I/O in which a
dedicated subsystem manages all network transfers and posts a completion
notification to your application when the transfer is complete. This allows you to use
your own connection-management/socket-multiplexing/read-write code rather than
using the facilities provided by cryptlib.
The following discussion refers to network sockets because this is the most common
abstraction that’s used for network I/O, however cryptlib will work with any network
I/O identifier that can be represented by an integer value or handle. If your network
abstraction requires more than a straightforward handle, you can pass in a reference
or index to an array of whatever data structures your system requires to handle
network I/O.
You can handle your own network connections by adding them to a cryptlib session
as the CRYPT_SESSINFO_NETWORKSOCKET attribute before you activate the
session. When you activate the session, cryptlib will use the socket that you’ve
supplied rather than opening its own connection. Once you shut down the session,
you can continue to use the socket or close it as required:
int socket;
Before you hand the socket over to cryptlib, you should disable Nagle’s algorithm,
since cryptlib provides its own optimised packet management. cryptlib leaves this
task to the caller to ensure that it doesn’t have to make any changes to the socket
settings itself. In other words, it will leave the socket exactly as it found it. In
addition you need to use a blocking socket, since cryptlib implements its own non-
blocking I/O layer for portability across different operating systems. This is
particularly important for Windows, where the socket must be non-blocking to avoid
false reports of the other side closing the connection due to bugs in some versions of
Winsock. Note that if you use certain Winsock functions such as WSAAsyncSelect
and WSAEventSelect on the socket, Windows will quietly switch the socket back to
non-blocking mode, so you need to be careful about inadvertently changing the state
of a socket behind cryptlib’s back.
In addition to managing the connection process, you can also use externally-supplied
sockets to handle network reads and writes. There are two general mechanisms used
for external network I/O, the Berkeley sockets select()-style mechanism:
select( ... );
…
read( ... );
An example of the latter is Windows’ I/O completion ports, which allow a central
dispatcher to initiate I/Os and a pool of client threads to manage them as required
whenever a request completes. The equivalent under Unix (although it’s less attuned
towards high-performance server operation, being targeted mainly at file I/O) is Posix
asynchronous I/O. Other operating systems provide similar facilities, for example
Tandem NSK has the RECV_NW and AWAITIOX calls to perform posted reads and
writes.
The more widely-used I/O model, using the select()-style mechanism, would
wait until data is available to be read on the socket and then call cryptPopData:
/* Wait for data to become available */
select( ... );
Once the read request has been completed by the underlying I/O system, a thread
from the thread pool that’s waiting on the completion port is woken up and handles
the result:
/* Wait for data to arrive */
GetQueuedCompletionStatus( hCompletionPort, ... );
The Windows kernel contains a number of special optimisations to provide the best
possible performance for this type of I/O. If you’re running a high-performance
134 Secure Sessions
server, you should consider using this style of I/O instead of the standard sockets
interface for better performance. In fact this style of I/O is the one that’s used by
servers like IIS to maximise performance.
The Unix equivalent would be:
/* Initiate the read request */
aio_read( &aiocb );
Unix asynchronous I/O is often used for high-performance I/O when the overhead of
the standard BSD select() is unacceptable. A typical select implementation, for
example, has to first copy and validate the socket descriptor masks for read, write,
and exception conditions, then call the underlying device’s poll routine for each
socket descriptor in each mask to let the device know that an I/O operation is being
requested for that descriptor, and finally wait for a notification on any of the
descriptors from the lower-level device drivers. There’s additional overhead created
by the fact that the kernel can’t afford to lock out I/O while all of this polling is
taking place, so the select code has to be able to handle the case of I/O occurring
during the polling process, usually by restarting the poll.
Asynchronous I/O, on the other hand, avoids all of this overhead by simply posting a
read or write and then waiting for the kernel to notify it that the operation has
completed. It therefore provides much better performance than an equivalent select-
based implementation.
If you supply the network socket yourself and the socket is a server socket, you can
no longer read the CRYPT_SESSINFO_CLIENT_NAME and CRYPT_SESSINFO_-
CLIENT_PORT attributes, since these are recorded when the incoming client
connection is established, and won’t be present with a user-supplied socket.
Some protocols like SSH have a considerable amount of protocol overhead and
require the sending and acknowledgement of messages that don’t perform any useful
data-exchange function. When these messages are received, the external select()
will report that there’s data available on the socket but cryptlib’s cryptPopData
won’t return any data. This is a normal condition for this protocol, since the message
is being processed and discarded internally (these message aren’t visible if cryptlib is
handling the socket since they’re processed internally, but do become visible if you’re
handling socket data yourself). If you’re implementing SSH and handling the socket
data yourself, you should expect to see the periodic arrival of data on the socket with
no data returned from cryptPopData.
Key Generation 135
Key Generation
To create an encryption context, you must specify the user who is to own the object
or CRYPT_UNUSED for the default, normal user, and the algorithm you want to use
for that context. The available public-key algorithms are given in “Algorithms” on
page 324. For example, to create and destroy an RSA context you would use:
CRYPT_CONTEXT cryptContext;
cryptDestroyContext( cryptContext );
CRYPT_CONTEXT privKeyContext;
If you want to generate a key of a particular length, you can set the CRYPT_-
CTXINFO_KEYSIZE attribute before calling cryptGenerateKey. For example to
generate a 1536-bit (192-byte) key you would use:
CRYPT_CONTEXT privKeyContext;
You can also change the default encryption and signature key sizes using the cryptlib
configuration options CRYPT_OPTION_PKC_KEYSIZE and CRYPT_OPTION_-
SIG_KEYSIZE as explained in “Working with Configuration Options” on page 287.
Once a key is generated into a context, you can’t load or generate a new key over the
top of it. If you try to do this, cryptlib will return CRYPT_ERROR_INITED to
indicate that a key is already loaded into the context.
Although cryptlib can work directly with public/private key data held in an
encryption context, you can’t communicate this key data to anyone else without first
turning it into an encoded key object like a certificate. This is because the key
consists of a (potentially large) number of abstract components that need to be
encoded into a standard format in order to communicate them to someone else, with a
certificate (or some equivalent object like a certificate request) being the standard
way to do this.
Because of this key-encoding requirement, you can’t immediately use a newly-
generated private key for anything other than signing a certification request or a self-
signed certificate (although you can store a raw key in a file keyset for later use, see
the next section for more details). To use the key for any other purpose, you need to
convert it into a certificate and then store the certificate alongside the private key in a
cryptlib private key file or crypto device. The process of obtaining a certificate and
updating a keyset or device with it is covered in more detail in “Certificates and
Certificate Management” on page 154. Once you’ve obtained the certificate, you can
add it to the keyset or device in which the key is stored, and cryptlib will
automatically associate it with the key when you read it.
Keyset Types
cryptlib supports a wide variety of keyset types. Most of these are public-key
keysets, which means that you can only store X.509 certificates (and by extension the
public keys associated with them) in them, but not private keys. These keyset types
Creating/Destroying Keyset Objects 137
include database keysets (the cryptlib native format for storing certificates), LDAP
directories, and web pages accessed via HTTP.
In addition to the public-key keysets, cryptlib also supports the storage of private
keys in cryptlib private key files (which use the PKCS #15 crypto token format) and
crypto devices such as smart cards, Fortezza cards, and hardware crypto accelerators.
cryptlib keysets can also be used to store certificates, but only those that already have
a corresponding private key stored in the keyset. cryptlib private key keysets can’t be
used as general-purpose public-key or certificate stores, they can only store
certificates associated with an existing private key.
The following table summarises the different keyset types and the operations that are
possible with each one. Unless you have a strong reason not to do so, it’s
recommended that you use cryptlib private key files to store private keys and their
associated certificates and database keysets to store standalone certificates.
Type Access Allowed
cryptlib Read/write access to public/private keys and any associated
certificates stored in a file using the PKCS #15 crypto token
format, with the private key portion encrypted. This is the
cryptlib native keyset format for private keys.
Crypto Read access to public/private keys and read/write access to
device certificates stored in the device. Devices aren’t general-
purpose keysets but can act like them for keys contained
within them. More information on crypto devices and on
generating private keys in them is given in “Encryption
Devices and ” on page 277.
Database Read/write access to X.509 certificates stored in a database.
This is the cryptlib native keyset format for public keys and
certificates and provides a fast, scalable key storage
mechanism. The exact database format used depends on the
platform, but would typically include any ODBC database
under Windows, and Informix, Ingres, MySQL, Oracle,
Postgres, SQLite and Sybase databases via ODBC under other
platforms.
HTTP Read access to X.509 certificates and CRLs accessed via
URLs or read access to a general-purpose HTTP certificate
storage mechanism.
LDAP Read/write access to X.509 certificates and CRLs stored in an
LDAP directory.
PGP Read/write access to PGP/OpenPGP key rings.
The recommended method for certificate storage is to use a database keyset, which
usually outperforms the other keyset types by a large margin, is highly scalable, and
is well suited for use in cases where data is already administered through existing
database servers.
CRYPT_KEYSET cryptKeyset;
/* Load/store keys */
cryptKeysetClose( cryptKeyset );
File Keysets
For cryptlib private key files and PGP/OpenPGP key rings, the keyset location is the
path to the disk file. For example to open a connection to a cryptlib key file key.p15
located in /users/dave/ you would use:
CRYPT_KEYSET cryptKeyset;
cryptlib will automatically determine the file type and access it in the appropriate
manner. Since cryptlib uses the PKCS #15 crypto token format to store private keys,
the files are given a .p15 extension or an appropriate equivalent as dictated by the
operating system being used. As another example, to open a connection to a cryptlib
private key file located in the Keys share on the Windows server FileServer you
would use:
CRYPT_KEYSET cryptKeyset;
A cryptlib private key file contains one or more encrypted private keys and any
associated certificates and other information needed to process them. Although
cryptlib can write keys to non-cryptlib formats like PGP/OpenPGP, you shouldn’t use
these for general key storage since they don’t contain the information needed for
many of the high-level operations that the native format does.
To create a new cryptlib keyset you would use:
CRYPT_KEYSET cryptKeyset;
If a cryptlib keyset of the given name already exists and you open it with CRYPT_-
KEYOPT_CREATE, cryptlib will erase it before creating a new one in its place. The
erasure process involves overwriting the original keyset with random data and
committing the write to disk to ensure that the data really is overwritten, truncating its
length to 0 bytes, resetting the file timestamp and attributes, and deleting the file to
ensure that no trace of the previous key remains. The new keyset is then created in its
place.
Note that cryptlib treats non-native key file formats as transport formats for
interoperability and doesn’t perform the extensive verification that’s required for keys
stored in these formats, which for cases like PGP/OpenPGP keyrings would require a
complete key-management application with access to PGP key databases. While
keys stored in cryptlib’s native format are verified when they’re loaded, it’s up to the
user to verify the integrity of keys imported from non-native formats.
For security reasons, cryptlib won’t write to a file if it isn’t a normal file (for example
if it’s a hard or symbolic link, if it’s a device name, or if it has other unusual
properties such as having a stream fattach()’d to it).
Where the operating system supports it, cryptlib will set the security options on the
keyset so that only the person who created it (and, in some cases, the system
administrator) can access it. For example under Unix the file access bits are set to
140 Key Generation and Storage
allow only the file owner to access the file, and under Windows the file’s access
control list is set so that only the user who owns the file can access or change it.
Since not even the system administrator can access the keyset under Windows, you
may need to manually enable access for others to allow the file to be backed up or
copied.
If your application is running as another user (for example if it’s running as a dæmon
under Unix or a service under Windows), the keyset will be owned by the dæmon or
service that creates it, following standard security practice. If you want to make the
keyset accessible to standard users, you need to either change the security options to
allow the required user access (for example by changing the file access permissions
or running in the context of the intended user when you create it), or provide an
interface to your dæmon/service to allow access to the keyset. The latter is generally
the preferred option, since it allows your dæmon/service to control exactly what the
user can do with the keyset.
In addition if you’re installing or configuring cryptlib as one user for use by another
user, you’ll need to adjust the access for any files that are created during the install or
configuration process to allow access by the target user. For example if you install
and configure cryptlib as a Windows administrator to run as a system service, you’ll
need to change the ownership of any key and configuration files to the system
account:
cacls filename /e /g system:f
If you don’t do this then the service (running under the system account) can’t access
the key/configuration files created under the administrator account.
When you open a keyset that contains private keys, you should bind it to the current
thread for added security to ensure that no other threads can access the file or the keys
read from it:
CRYPT_KEYSET cryptKeyset;
You can find out more about binding objects to threads in “Object Security” on page
46.
HTTP Keysets
HTTP keysets can use two ways of accessing keys, one is via an absolute URL that
specifies the path to a single key, and the other is via a URL giving the location of an
HTTP certificate storage mechanism. In either case the format is:
CRYPT_KEYSET cryptKeyset;
HTTP keysets normally behave just like any other keysets, however if you’re reading
a key from a fixed URL (with no per-key ID) you need to use the special ID [none]
to indicate that the keyset URL points directly at the certificate. For example to read
a certificate from the static URL http://www.server.com/cert.der you
would use:
CRYPT_KEYSET cryptKeyset;
CRYPT_HANDLE publicKey;
The CRLs provided by some CAs can become quite large, so you may need to play
with timeouts in order to allow the entire CRL to be downloaded if the link is slow or
congested.
If you’re using a HTTP certificate storage mechanism located at
http://www.server.com/certstore/ then the same code would become:
CRYPT_KEYSET cryptKeyset;
CRYPT_CERTIFICATE cryptCertificate;
More details on reading keys are given in “Reading a Key from a Keyset” on page
145.
If you want to publish certificates online, the best way to do this is with an HTTP
keyset. The server side of HTTP certificate access is handled as a standard cryptlib
session, and is covered in “Making Certificates Available Online” on page 186.
Database Keysets
For keys (strictly speaking, X.509 certificates) that are stored in a database, the keyset
name is the ODBC data source name (DSN) for the database. The nature of the name
depends on the database type and ranges from a straight ODBC DSN through to a
complex combination of the name or address of the server that contains the database,
the name of the database on the server, and the user name and password required to
access the database.
The database keyset has a type of CRYPT_KEYSET_DATABASE. With some
systems that don’t support any type of database access (for example some embedded
systems have no database capability), cryptlib can’t be used with a database keyset
and is restricted to the simpler keyset types such as cryptlib private key files.
The simplest type of keyset to access is a local database that requires no extra
parameters such as a user name or password. An example of this is an ODBC data
source on the local machine identified by a straightforward DSN. For example if the
keyset is stored in a database such as DB2, Ingres, MariaDB, MySQL, Oracle, SQL
Server, SQLite, Sybase, or PostgreSQL, which is accessed through the “PublicKeys”
ODBC DSN, you would access it with:
CRYPT_KEYSET cryptKeyset;
The database name parameter used above was a simple ODBC DSN, but this can also
contain a user name, password, and server name (or at least server DSN), in the
format user:pass@server. For example, you can specify a combination of database
user name and password as user:pass, and a user name and server as user@server.
Other, database-specific combinations and parameters may also be possible,
depending on the database backend you’re using.
In the examples shown above, the keyset was opened with the CRYPT_KEYOPT_-
READONLY option. The use of this option is recommended when you’ll use the
keyset to retrieve a certificate but not store one (which is usually the case) since it
allows cryptlib to optimise its transaction management with the database backend.
This can help with performance due to the different data buffering and locking
strategies that can be employed if the back-end knows that the database won’t be
142 Key Generation and Storage
updated. If you try to write a certificate to a keyset that has been opened in read-only
mode, cryptlib will return CRYPT_ERROR_PERMISSION to indicate that you can’t
write to the database.
To create a new certificate database, you can use the CRYPT_KEYOPT_CREATE
option. If a keyset of the given name already exists, cryptlib will return CRYPT_-
ERROR_DUPLICATE, otherwise it will create a new certificate database ready to
have certificates added to it.
Database keysets can also be used as certificate stores, an extended type of keyset
which is required in order to perform CA operations such as issuing certificates and
CRLs. In order to create this type of keyset instead of a conventional one you must
be a CA user and you need to specify its type as CRYPT_KEYSET_DATABASE_-
STORE instead of the basic database keyset type. Because this is a CA-specific
certificate store, certificates and CRLs can’t be directly added to or deleted from it
but have to be processed using cryptlib’s certificate management functionality. For
example you can’t add a certificate directly to a certificate store using
cryptAddPublicKey but have to create a certificate from a certificate request using
cryptCACertManagement. More information on certificate stores and their use is
given in “Managing a Certification Authority” on page 179.
In order to create or open a certificate store, you must be a CA user. If you try to
access a certificate store and aren’t a CA user, cryptlib will return CRYPT_ERROR_-
PARAM2 to indicate that the user type isn’t valid for accessing this type of keyset.
Normal users can’t update a certificate store in any way, however they can access
them in read-only mode as normal database keysets. For example while a CA could
open a certificate store as:
CRYPT_KEYSET cryptKeyset;
and perform updates on the store, a non-CA user could only access it in read-only
mode as a standard database keyset:
CRYPT_KEYSET cryptKeyset;
When opened in this manner the certificate store appears as a standard database
keyset rather than as a full certificate store.
To provide additional security alongside the precautions taken by cryptlib, you should
apply standard database security measures to ensure that all database keyset accesses
are carried out with least privileges. For example if your application only needs read
access to a keyset, you can use the SQL GRANT/REVOKE mechanism to allow
read-only access of the appropriate kind for the application. An SQL statement like
REVOKE ALL ON certificates FROM user; GRANT SELECT ON certificates TO
user would allow only read accesses to the certificate keyset. You can also use
server-specific security measures such as accessing the keyset through SQL Server’s
built-in db_datareader account, which only allows read access to tables, and the
ability to run the application under a dedicated low-privilege account (a standard
feature of Unix systems).
LDAP Keysets
For keys stored in an LDAP directory, the keyset location is the name of the LDAP
server, with an optional port if access is via a non-standard port. For example if the
LDAP server was called directory.ldapserver.com, you would access the
keyset with:
Creating/Destroying Keyset Objects 143
CRYPT_KEYSET cryptKeyset;
If the server is configured to allow access on a non-standard port, you can append the
port to the server name in the usual manner for URL’s. For example if the server
mentioned above listened on port 8389 instead of the usual 389 you would use:
CRYPT_KEYSET cryptKeyset;
You can also optionally include the ldap:// protocol specifier in the URL, this is
ignored by cryptlib.
The storage of certificates in LDAP directories is haphazard and vendor-dependent,
and you may need to adjust cryptlib’s LDAP configuration options to work with a
particular vendor’s idea of how certificates and CRLs should be stored on a server.
In order to make it easier to adapt cryptlib to work with different vendor’s ways of
storing information in a directory, cryptlib provides various LDAP-related
configuration options that allow you to specify the X.500 objects and attributes used
for certificate storage. These options are:
Configuration Option Description
CRYPT_OPTION_KEYS_- The X.500 attribute that certificates are stored
LDAP_CERTNAME as. For some reason certificates belonging to
CRYPT_OPTION_KEYS_- certification authorities (CAs) are stored
LDAP_CACERTNAME under their own attribute type, so if a search
for a certificate fails cryptlib will try again
using the CA certificate attribute (there’s no
easy way to tell in advance how a certificate
will be stored, so it’s necessary to do it this
way). In addition a number of other attribute
types have been invented to hide certificates
under, it may require a bit of experimentation
to determine how the server you’re using
stores things.
The default settings for these options are
userCertificate;binary and
cACertificate;binary, a variety of other
choices also exist. Note the use of the
binary qualifier, this is required for a
number of directories that would otherwise
try and encode the returned information as
text rather than returning the raw certificate.
CRYPT_OPTION_KEYS_- The X.500 attribute that certificate revocation
LDAP_CRLNAME lists (CRLs) are stored as, defaulting to
certificateRevocationList;binary.
The only real difference is that any encryption performed with the key is handled via
the crypto device, although cryptlib hides all of the details so that the key looks and
functions just like any other encryption context.
You can use cryptGetPublicKey not only on straight public-key keysets but also on
private key keysets, in which case it will return the public portion of the private key
or the certificate associated with the key.
The other function which is used to obtain a key is cryptGetPrivateKey, which
differs from cryptGetPublicKey in that it expects a password alongside the user ID
if the key is being read from a keyset. This is required because private keys are
usually stored encrypted and the function needs a password to decrypt the key. If the
key is held in a crypto device (which requires a PIN or password when you open a
session with it, but not when you read a key), you can pass in a null pointer in place
of the password. For example if Noki Crow’s email address was [email protected]
and you wanted to read their private key, protected by the password “Password”,
from a keyset you would use:
CRYPT_CONTEXT privKeyContext;
You can cancel a query in progress at any time by submitting a new query consisting
of the command “cancel”.
Queries are submitted by setting the CRYPT_KEYINFO_QUERY attribute for a
keyset, which tells it how to perform the query. Let’s look at a very simple query
which is equivalent to a straight cryptGetPublicKey:
CRYPT_CERTIFICATE certificate;
This will read each certificate corresponding to the given email address from the
database. Note that the key ID is unused because the keys that are returned are
selected by the initial query and not by the key identifier.
This example is an artificially simple one, it’s possible to submit queries of arbitrary
complexity in the form of full SQL queries. Since the key databases that are being
queried can have arbitrary names for the certificate attributes (corresponding to
database columns), cryptlib provides a mapping from certificate attribute to database
field names. An example of this mapping is shown in the code above, in which
148 Key Generation and Storage
$email is used to specify the email address attribute, which may have a completely
different name once it reaches the database backend. The certificate attribute names
are as follows:
Attribute Field
$C, $SP, $L, $O, Certificate country, state or province, locality,
$OU, $CN organisation, organisational unit, and common name.
$date Certificate expiry date
$email Certificate email address
You can use these attributes to build arbitrarily complex queries to retrieve particular
groups of certificates from a key database. For example to retrieve all certificates
issued for US users (obviously this is only practical with small databases) you would
use:
cryptSetAttributeString( keyset, CRYPT_KEYINFO_QUERY, "$C='US'", 7 );
Extending this one stage further, you could retrieve all certificates issued to
Californian users with:
cryptSetAttributeString( keyset, CRYPT_KEYINFO_QUERY, "$C='US' AND
$SP='CA'", 20 );
Going another step beyond this, you could retrieve all certificates issued to users in
San Francisco:
cryptSetAttributeString( keyset, CRYPT_KEYINFO_QUERY, "$C='US' AND
$SP='CA' AND $L='San Francisco'", 43 );
Going even further than this, you could retrieve all certificates issued to users in San
Francisco whose names begin with an ‘a’:
cryptSetAttributeString( keyset, CRYPT_KEYINFO_QUERY, "$C='US' AND
$SP='CA' AND $L='San Francisco' AND $CN LIKE 'A%'", 61 );
These queries will return the certificates in whatever order the underlying database
returns them in. You can also specify that they be returned in a given order, for
example to order the certificates in the previous query by user name you would use:
cryptSetAttributeString( keyset, CRYPT_KEYINFO_QUERY, "$C='US' AND
$SP='CA' AND $L='San Francisco' ORDER BY $CN", 56 );
To retrieve all certificates that don’t need replacement within the next week, you
could negate the previous query to give:
cryptSetAttributeString( keyset, CRYPT_KEYINFO_QUERY, "NOT $date <
today + 1 week", length );
As these examples show, cryptlib’s keyset query capability provides the ability to
perform arbitrary general-purpose queries on keysets.
Once a query has begun running, it can return a considerable number of certificates.
If you try to initiate another query while the first one is in progress or perform a
Reading a Key from a Keyset 149
This will clear the current query and prepare the keyset for another query or an
alternative operation such as a key read, write, or delete.
Unlike all other cryptlib keyset operations, the keyset query capability provides a
powerful general-purpose access mechanism that allows you to send arbitrary
command strings in the form of SQL queries to the keyset database. Because of this
capability you should never allow user data to be used directly in a keyset query since
(with the appropriate use of backend-specific escape sequences) it’s possible for a
malicious user to submit arbitrary SQL command strings to the database (SQL
injection). If you must use the general database query facility, use it only with fixed
strings containing no externally-supplied data whose format you can’t control, and as
an extra precaution open the database in read-only mode and access it as a limited-
access user with no write or update privileges for the database.
Handling Multiple Certificates with the Same Name
Sometimes a keyset may contain multiple certificates issued to the same person.
Whether this situation will occur varies by CA, some CAs won’t issue multiple
certificates with the same name, some will, and some may modify the name to
eliminate conflicts, for example by adding unique ID values to the name or using
middle initials to disambiguate names. If multiple certificates exist, you can perform
a keyset query to read each in turn and try and find one that matches your
requirements, for example you might be able to filter them based on key usage or
some other parameter held in the certificate. The general idea is to issue a query
based on the name and then read each certificate that matches the query until you find
an appropriate one:
cryptSetAttributeString( keyset, CRYPT_KEYINFO_QUERY, "…", … );
while( cryptGetPublicKey( &certificate, keyset, … ) == CRYPT_OK && \
certificate doesn't match required usage )
/* Continue */;
cryptSetAttributeString( keyset, CRYPT_KEYINFO_QUERY, "cancel", 6 );
This use of general queries allows the maximum flexibility in selecting certificates in
cases when multiple choices are present.
Key Group Management
Sometimes it may be desirable to treat a group of keys in the same way. For example
if a collection of servers use keys to protect their communications with each other
then compromise of one key may require the revocation of all keys in the group and
the issuance of a new group of keys. The easiest way to handle key groups is by
assigning a common identifier to all the keys in the group when you issue certificates
for them, and then replacing all keys with that identifier when it comes time to update
the key group.
The first part of the process involves assigning a key group identifier to certificates.
The easiest way to do this is to specify it as part of the PKI user information that’s
used with the CMP and SCEP protocols. For example to specify that a PKI user
belongs to the remote access users key group using the organisational unit portion of
the user DN you would use:
150 Key Generation and Storage
/* ... */
/* ... */
When the user requests their certificate, the key group will be given as the
organisational unit component (alongside the other components such as the
organisation name and country) in their DN. More information on working with PKI
users is given in “Initialising PKI User Information” on page 181. Alternatively, you
can manually set the key group identifier when you issue a certificate to someone in
the key group if you’re manually issuing certificates rather than using an automated
mechanism like CMP or SCEP.
The second part of the process involves identifying all of the certificates in a key
group that need to be revoked or replaced. This is handled through cryptlib’s keyset
query capability, retrieving each certificate in the group in turn:
CRYPT_CERTIFICATE certificate;
Once the certificate has been fetched, you can revoke it or notify the owner that they
need to replace it as required. More information on keyset queries is given in
“General Keyset Queries” on page 147.
Writing a private key requires one extra parameter, the password which is used to
encrypt the private key components. cryptlib will use the default encryption method
(usually AES) to encrypt the key with the given password. If you’re writing the
private key to a crypto device, the password parameter should be set to NULL since
the device provides its own protection for the key (not all devices support direct key
loading, some require the key to be generated inside the device).
To write a private key to a keyset you would use the corresponding
cryptAddPrivateKey function:
cryptAddPrivateKey( cryptKeyset, privKeyContext, password );
If the certificate you are trying to write is already present in the keyset, cryptlib will
return CRYPT_ERROR_DUPLICATE. If the keyset is a public-key keyset, you can
use cryptDeleteKey to delete the existing certificate so you can write the new one in
its place. If the keyset is a cryptlib key file or crypto device, this would delete both
the certificate and the key it corresponds to. Finally, certificate stores can’t be
directly manipulated by adding or deleting certificates and CRLs but must be
managed using cryptlib’s certificate management functionality. If you try to directly
insert or delete a certificate or CRL, cryptlib will return CRYPT_ERROR_-
PERMISSION to indicate that this operation isn’t allowed.
There is one instance in which it’s possible to add a new certificate to a cryptlib
private key file when there’s already an existing certificate present, and that’s when
the new certificate updates the existing one. For example some CAs will re-issue a
certificate with a newer expiry date (rather than using a new key and certificate), if
you add this new certificate to the keyset cryptlib will replace the existing, older
certificate with the newer one and use the newer one in all future operations.
Writing to a PGP public keyring works somewhat differently from writing to a
standard cryptlib key file because of various constraints imposed by the PGP format.
Unlike standard cryptlib keysets, a PGP public keyring is just a collection of
individual keys concatenated together, where an individual key consists of an
interlinked collection of subkeys, identity packets, binding signatures, and assorted
other paraphernalia. Because of the need to bind multiple keys and identities together
into something that appears as a single key when accessed, cryptlib will allow a
single key or linked set of keys to be written to a PGP public keyring but won’t allow
it to be updated later with further keys because the necessary key bindings won’t be
available any more. If you need to merge individual PGP public key files into a large
keyring, you can just concatenate the files together.
Another restriction imposed by the PGP format is that even when writing to a public
keyring you need to provide a private key when you call cryptAddPublicKey. This
is necessary because the key needs to have a binding signature applied to it when it’s
written, and for that a private key is required.
A final complication is created by the fact that for some encryption algorithms PGP
actually uses two different keys that appear as the same key, one that only does
encryption and another that only does digital signatures. When you add one of these
paired keys to a PGP keyring you first need to add the encryption key and then the
signature private key, which is used to sign the encryption key.
Taking all of these restrictions into account, the process for saving a set of PGP
encryption and signature keys to a PGP public keyring is:
cryptKeysetOpen( &cryptKeyset, CRYPT_UNUSED, CRYPT_KEYSET_FILE,
″pubring.pgp″ );
cryptAddPublicKey( cryptKeyset, encryptionPublicKey );
cryptAddPublicKey( cryptKeyset, signaturePrivateKey );
cryptKeysetClose( cryptKeyset );
If you’re using a single key that can perform both encryption and signatures then you
only need to add the single (dual-purpose) private key.
When you’re working with devices, you can’t create a key inside a standard cryptlib
context and then move it to the device later on since the security features of the
device won’t allow this, and you can’t take a key created via a crypto device and
152 Key Generation and Storage
write it to a keyset, because it can’t be exported from the device. By using crypto
hardware to handle your keys you’re guaranteeing that the key is never exposed
outside the hardware, keeping it safe from any malicious code that might be present
in your system.
Although cryptlib can work directly with private keys, other formats like X.509
certificates, S/MIME messages, and SSL require complex and convoluted naming
and identification schemes for their keys. Because of this, you can’t immediately use
a newly-generated private key with these formats for anything other than signing a
certification request or a self-signed certificate. To use it for any other purpose, you
need to obtain an X.509 certificate that identifies the key and then store the certificate
alongside the private key in a cryptlib private key file or crypto device. The process
of obtaining a certificate and updating a keyset or device with it is covered in more
detail in “Certificates and Certificate Management” on page 154. Once you’ve
obtained the certificate, you can add it to the keyset or device and cryptlib will
automatically associate it with the key when you read the key.
If you are working with a database keyset, you can also add a certificate revocation
list (CRL) to the keyset. Since a CRL isn’t an actual key, you can’t read it back out
of the keyset (there’s nothing to read), but you can use it to check the revocation state
of certificates. CRLs and their uses are explained in more detail in “Certificate
Revocation using CRLs” on page 238.
Changing a Private Key Password
Changing the password on a private key file involves reading the key from a keyset
using the old password, deleting the key from the keyset, and writing the in-memory
copy back again using the new password:
read key from keyset using old password;
delete key from keyset;
re-write key to keyset using new password;
All cryptlib key file updates are atomic all-or-nothing operations, which means that if
the computer crashes between deleting the old key and writing the new one, the old
key will still be present when the machine is rebooted (specifically, all changes are
committed when the keyset is closed, which minimises the risk of losing data due to a
system crash or power outage in the middle of a long sequence of update operations).
To update a private key with a new password you would use:
CRYPT_KEYSET cryptKeyset;
CRYPT_CONTEXT cryptKey;
/* Read the key from the keyset using the old password */
cryptKeysetOpen( &cryptKeyset, cryptUser /* CRYPT_UNUSED */,
CRYPT_KEYSET_FILE, keysetName, CRYPT_KEYOPT_NONE );
cryptGetPrivateKey( cryptKeyset, &cryptKey, CRYPT_KEYID_NAME, label,
oldPassword );
/* Write the key back to the keyset using the new password */
cryptAddPrivateKey( cryptKeyset, cryptKey, newPassword );
cryptKeysetClose( cryptKeyset );
' Read the key from the keyset using the old password
cryptKeysetOpen cryptKeyset, cryptUser, CRYPT_KEYSET_FILE, keysetName,
CRYPT_KEYOPT_NONE
cryptGetPrivateKey cryptKeyset, cryptKey, CRYPT_KEYID_NAME, label,
oldPassword
' Delete the current copy of the key from the keyset
cryptDeleteKey cryptKeyset, label
Deleting a Key 153
' Write the key back to the keyset using the new password
cryptAddPrivateKey cryptKeyset, cryptKey, newPassword
cryptKeysetClose cryptKeyset
Deleting a Key
Deleting a key with cryptDeleteKey works in the same manner as reading a key,
with the key to delete being identified by a key ID in the usual manner. For example
if you wanted to delete S.Crow’s key from a keyset you would use:
cryptDeleteKey( cryptKeyset, CRYPT_KEYID_NAME, "S.Crow" );
In the case of an LDAP directory, this will delete the entire entry, not just the
certificate attribute or attributes for the entry. In the case of a cryptlib private key file
or crypto device, this will delete the key and any certificates that may be associated
with it. If you try to delete a key from a read-only keyset, cryptlib will return
CRYPT_ERROR_PERMISSION. If the key you’re trying to delete isn’t present in
the keyset, cryptlib will return CRYPT_ERROR_NOTFOUND.
154 Certificates and Certificate Management
This example assumes that the certificate is immediately available from a CA, which
is not always the case. The full range of possibilities are covered in more detail
further on.
Once you’ve updated the private key with a certificate (which is the only time you
can write a public key certificate to a private key keyset), cryptlib will automatically
associate the certificate with the private key so that when you read it with
cryptGetPrivateKey cryptlib will recreate the certificate alongside the key and
attach it to the key. You can then use the combined certificate and key to perform
operations that require the use of certificates such as certificate signing, S/MIME
email decryption and signing, and user authentication. If you update the private key
with a complete certificate chain instead of just a single certificate, cryptlib will
attach the full certificate chain to the key when you read it with
cryptGetPrivateKey.
The update process involves adding the certificate information to the keyset or
device, which updates it with the certificate object (either a certificate or a certificate
chain):
cryptAddPublicKey( cryptKeyset, cryptCertificate );
The certificate object which is being written must match a private key stored in the
keyset or device. If it doesn’t match an existing private key, cryptlib will return a
CRYPT_ERROR_PARAM2 error to indicate that the information in the certificate
object being added is incorrect. If there’s already a certificate for this key present,
cryptlib will return a CRYPT_ERROR_DUPLICATE error to indicate that one key
can’t have two different certificates associated with it. See “Writing a Key to a
Keyset” on page 150 for more on writing keys to keysets.
Using Separate Signature and Encryption Certificates
It’s good security practice to use different keys for signing and encryption, and most
digital signature laws contain some requirement that the two capabilities be
implemented with separate keys. cryptlib supports the use of two (or more) keys
belonging to a single user, the only issue to be aware of is that you should give each
key a distinct label to allow it to be selected with cryptGetPrivateKey. For example
the process of creating a keyset containing separate signature and encryption keys
with the signature key labelled “My signature key” and the encryption key labelled
“My encryption key” would be:
156 Certificates and Certificate Management
When you want to sign data, you would call cryptGetPrivateKey specifying the use
of “Signature key”; when you want to decrypt data you would call
cryptGetPrivateKey specifying the use of “Encryption key” (or cryptlib’s automatic
key management will find it for you if you’re using it with a cryptlib envelope).
Plug-and-play PKI
The easiest way to set up keys and certificates is through cryptlib’s plug-and-play
PKI facility, which performs the operations described above for you. To set up keys
and certificates in this manner, cryptlib requires a private-key keyset or crypto token
such as a smart card or Fortezza card to store keys and certificates in, the URL of a
plug-and-play PKI-capable CA, and a user name and password to authorise the
issuing of the certificates. The session type for the plug-and-play PKI is CRYPT_-
SESSION_CMP, the same type as a standard CMP session except that cryptlib
manages everything for you. The private-key keyset or crypto token is specified as
CRYPT_SESSINFO_CMP_PRIVKEYSET, and the user name and password to
authorise the operation are provided as the CRYPT_SESSINFO_USERNAME and
CRYPT_SESSINFO_PASSWORD:
CRYPT_SESSION cryptSession;
CRYPT_KEYSET cryptKeyset;
Once this process has been completed, the private-key keyset or crypto token that you
provided will contain a signature key identified by the label “Signature key”, and an
encryption key identified by the label “Encryption key” if the public-key algorithm
being used is capable of encryption, along with any additional certificates and CA
certificates that are required to use the keys. Both keys will be protected using the
password that you provided to authenticate the certification process. If you want to
change the password for either of the keys you can do so as described in “Changing a
Private Key Password” on page 152 before you close the keyset and commit the data
to disk. Alternatively, if you want to retain the password that you used for the
certificate issue to protect the keys and certificates, you can close the keyset
immediately after you add it to the session and cryptlib will manage it for you.
If the CA is issuing you a CA certificate of your own, the keyset or crypto token will
contain a single CA signing key identified by the label “Signature key”. Since CA
keys can’t be used for encryption or general-purpose signing but only for signing
other certificates, only the single CA signing key is created.
In addition to returning your own certificates, the plug-and-play PKI mechanism also
performs a PKIBoot certificate bootstrap operation that downloads an initial trusted
certificate set for you to use. This trusted certificate set only contains a small number
of known-good certificates trusted by the CA that provided you with your own
certificates, rather than the 100+ certificates that you’d be forced to automatically
trust when you use a web browser (some of these browser certificates have weak 512-
bit keys, or are owned by CAs that have gone out of business, or whose private keys
have been on-sold to third parties when the original owner went bankrupt, sometimes
passing through multiple owners). The PKIBoot operation allows an end user,
starting with nothing more than the user name and password used for the plug-and-
play PKI operation to acquire all of the information necessary to use the PKI, without
having to manually download and install certificates, or being forced to trust a large
collection of certificates from unknown CAs.
Once the PKIBoot process has completed, the trusted certificates will be present in
memory as standard cryptlib trusted certificates (see “Certificate Trust Management”
on page 241). To commit them to permanent storage and make them available for
future cryptlib sessions, you need to save the cryptlib configuration data as explained
in “Working with Trust Settings” on page 242:
cryptSetAttribute( CRYPT_UNUSED, CRYPT_OPTION_CONFIGCHANGED, FALSE );
If you don’t want to rely on the PKIBoot trusted certificates, don’t commit the
configuration data to permanent storage and they’ll be deleted from memory the next
time cryptlib is restarted.
At this point the keys are ready for use for encryption, signing, email protection,
authentication, and so on. Because of the ease of use provided by the plug-and-play
PKI facility, it’s strongly recommended that you use this in place of any other
certificate management process, since the alternatives require significantly larger
amounts of effort in order to do more or less the same thing.
For a crypto device such as a smart card or Fortezza card, the key is generated inside
the device, so this step simplifies to:
generate public/private key pair;
The generated key is already stored inside the device, so there’s no need to explicitly
write it to any storage media.
The certification process varies somewhat, a typical case has already been presented
earlier:
create certification request;
submit certification request to CA;
receive certificate from CA;
update keyset or device to include certificate;
Now that the general outline has been covered, we can look at the individual steps in
more detail. Generating a public/private key pair and saving it to a keyset is
relatively simple:
CRYPT_CONTEXT cryptContext;
CRYPT_KEYSET cryptKeyset;
/* Create an RSA public/private key context, set a label for it, and
generate a key into it */
cryptCreateContext( &cryptContext, cryptUser /* CRYPT_UNUSED */,
CRYPT_ALGO_RSA );
cryptSetAttributeString( cryptContext, CRYPT_CTXINFO_LABEL,
"Private key", 11 );
cryptGenerateKey( cryptContext );
/* Clean up */
cryptDestroyContext( cryptContext );
/* Clean up */
crypt.DestroyContext( cryptContext );
' Create an RSA public/private key context, set a label for it,
' and generate a key into it
cryptCreateContext cryptContext, cryptUser, CRYPT_ALGO_RSA
cryptSetAttributeString cryptContext, CRYPT_CTXINFO_LABEL, _
"Private key", 11
cryptGenerateKey cryptContext
The Certification Process 159
' Clean up
cryptKeysetClose cryptKeyset
cryptDestroyContext cryptContext
The process for a crypto device is identical except that the keyset write is omitted,
since the key is already held inside the device.
At the same time that you create and save the public/private key pair, you would
create a certification request:
CRYPT_CERTIFICATE cryptCertRequest;
The certificate request details vary depending on what you’ll want in the certificate
that you’re requesting, the values given above, consisting of a country name,
organisation details, and a name and email address, are illustrative only. At a
minimum, you need to supply the certificate identification information described in
“Certificate Identification Information” on page 223 and “Extended Certificate
Identification Information” on page 228. Depending on the situation, you may also
160 Certificates and Certificate Management
/* Clean up */
cryptKeysetClose( cryptKeyset );
cryptDestroyCert( cryptCertificate );
' Clean up
cryptKeysetClose cryptKeyset
cryptDestroyCert cryptCertificate
Since a device acts just like a keyset for certificate updates, you can write a certificate
to a device in the same manner.
If, as will usually be the case, the certification turnaround time is somewhat longer,
you will need to wait awhile to receive the certificate back from the CA. Once the
certificate arrives from the CA, you update the keyset as before:
CRYPT_CERTIFICATE cryptCertificate;
CRYPT_KEYSET cryptKeyset;
/* Clean up */
cryptDestroyCert( cryptCertificate );
' Open the keyset for update and add the certificate
cryptKeysetOpen cryptKeyset, cryptUser, CRYPT_KEYSET_FILE, fileName, _
CRYPT_KEYOPT_NONE
cryptAddPublicKey cryptKeyset, cryptCertificate
cryptKeysetClose cryptKeyset
' Clean up
cryptDestroyCert cryptCertificate
/* Sign the certificate with the private key and update the still-open
keyset with it */
cryptSignCert( cryptCertificate, cryptContext );
cryptAddPublicKey( cryptKeyset, cryptCertificate );
/* Clean up */
cryptKeysetClose( cryptKeyset );
cryptDestroyCert( cryptCertificate );
When you sign a certificate for which the CRYPT_CERTINFO_CA attribute has
been set, cryptlib will enable the key usages CRYPT_KEYUSAGE_KEYCERTSIGN
and CRYPT_KEYUSAGE_CRLSIGN to indicate that the key can be used to sign
certificates and CRLs. Since this is a CA key it will by default only be usable for
these purposes and not for any other purpose such as encryption or general-purpose
signing. You can override this by setting the key usage yourself, however CA keys
shouldn’t really be used for a purpose other than one or both of certificate and/or
CRL signing.
certificate (this has to be added after the public key information so that cryptlib can
auto-configure the certificate as a signature and/or encryption certificate depending
on the key that’s added), add a name via the CRYPT_CERTINFO_-
COMMONNAME attribute (and an email address via the CRYPT_CERTINFO_-
RFC822NAME attribute if you plan to use the certificate for email purposes), and
finally sign the certificate. The name is usually the name of the certificate owner, but
if you want to use it with an SSL server then it’s the name of the SSL server. For
example to create a simplified certificate for Dave Smith you would first generate a
public/private key pair into a cryptContext as described in “The Certification
Process” on page 157 and then use:
CRYPT_CERTIFICATE cryptCertificate;
To create a simplified certificate for the SSL server www.sslserver.com you would
go through the same steps but give the server name instead of the user’s name:
/* ... */
cryptSetAttributeString( cryptCertificate, CRYPT_CERTINFO_COMMONNAME,
"www.sslserver.com", 17 );
/* ... */
Finally, if you wanted to use the certificate for email purposes you also need to add
the certificate owner’s email address:
/* ... */
cryptSetAttributeString( cryptCertificate, CRYPT_CERTINFO_RFC822NAME,
"[email protected]", 14 );
/* ... */
Since these certificates can be used for any purpose and (effectively) never expire,
you can use them without having to worry about certificate requests, communicating
with (and paying money to) a CA, proof of possession protocols, X.500 distinguished
names, key usages, certificate extensions, and all the other paraphernalia that comes
with X.509 certificates.
In order to distinguish these simplified certificates from normal certificates, cryptlib
indicates that they were issued under a simplified-certificate policy using the
certificatePolicies attribute, which is described in more detail in “Certificate Policies,
Policy Mappings, Policy Constraints, and Policy Inhibiting” on page 247.
The process involved in creating a request for use in CMP is mostly identical to
creating a normal certification request (although the formats are incompatible cryptlib
hides the details so the programming interface is identical) and is covered below.
cryptlib also implements a full CMP server that allows you to issue certificates using
CMP. This process is described in “Managing a CA using CMP or SCEP” on page
185.
CMP Operation Types
The CMP protocol provides for a variety of certificate issue operations, which are as
follows::
Operation Description
CRYPT_REQUESTTYPE_- Request for CA information such as the CA’s
PKIBOOT certificates, protected by a user name and
password supplied by the CA.
CRYPT_REQUESTTYPE_- Initial request to a CA, protected by a user
INITIALISATION name and password supplied by the CA.
CRYPT_REQUESTTYPE_- Subsequent request to the CA, protected by a
CERTIFICATE signature created with an existing CA-
certified key. This message is used to request
a new certificate.
164 Certificates and Certificate Management
Operation Description
CRYPT_REQUESTTYPE_- Subsequent request to the CA, protected by a
KEYUPDATE signature created with an existing CA-
certified key. This message is used to request
an update of an existing certificate.
CRYPT_REQUESTTYPE_- Request for revocation of an existing
REVOCATION certificate, protected either by a password
supplied by the CA or by a signature created
with an existing CA certified key.
When you submit a CMP request, you need to specify the request type before you
activate the session. If it’s a PKIBoot, Initialisation, or (for some CAs) Revocation
request then the session is authenticated using a user name and password that was
previously obtained from the CA. If it’s a Certificate or Key Update or (for some
CAs) Revocation request then the session is authenticated using a signature created
with a key that was previously certified by the CA.
The difference between a Certificate request and a Key Update request is that a
Certificate request is used to request a certificate for a new key while a Key Update
request is used to request an updated certificate for an existing key. Since a Key
Update reuses existing certificate data, you need to change something in the
certificate request like its validity date(s) in order to avoid it being rejected as a
request for a duplicate certificate.
The typical CMP message flow consists of a PKIBoot to obtain the CA information
followed by an Initialisation request to get the initial certificate, and then a standard
Certificate request to obtain subsequent certificates.
The PKIBoot request isn’t a standard certificate request but simply returns CA
parameters like the CA’s certificates and other data. This is normally handled
transparently as part of cryptlib’s plug-and-play PKI, described in “Plug-and-play
PKI” on page 156, but you can also submit an explicit PKIBoot request yourself in
order to obtain or update CA and other certificates. Since the PKIBoot process is
protected by the same cryptographic mechanisms used to protect other operations,
there’s no risk of someone slipping in fake CA certificates since the cryptographic
mechanisms used ensure that the certificates that you’re getting came from the real
CA. This makes PKIBoot an ideal mechanism for provisioning devices with
certificates, as discussed in “Plug-and-play PKI” on page 156.
Note that some CAs will treat the password which is used during the initialisation
stage as a one-time password, so that all subsequent requests have to be authenticated
by being signed with the initial certificate. In addition some CAs require the DN
used in subsequent certificates to be the same as the one used in the initialisation
request while others don’t, some CAs allow a user-specified DN while others require
the use of a fixed DN or set it themselves (overriding the user-supplied value), and
some CAs require revocation requests to be protected by a signature rather than a
password, which means that if no signature certificate is available (for example you
want to revoke a certificate because you’ve lost the private key, or you have an
encryption-only certificate), the certificate can’t be revoked. CAs will also perform
CA policy-specific operations during the certificate issue process, for example some
CAs will automatically revoke a certificate which is superseded by a new one via an
update request to prevent a situation in which two otherwise identical certificates
exist at the same time.
CMP Certificate Requests
CMP uses a generic certificate request object to handle requests for new certificates
and certificate renewals and updates. The creation of a CMP certificate request of
type CRYPT_CERTTYPE_REQUEST_CERT follows the general pattern for
certificate requests given earlier in “The Certification Process” on page 157 and is as
follows:
Obtaining Certificates using CMP 165
CRYPT_CERTIFICATE cryptCMPRequest;
Note that a revocation request isn’t signed since the key required to sign it may not be
available any more (loss of the corresponding private key is one of the reasons for
revoking a certificate). Once the revocation request has been completed you can
submit it to the CA as usual.
CMP Sessions
Once a CMP request has been prepared, it’s ready for submission to the CA. This is
done via a CMP session object, which manages the details of communicating with the
CA, authenticating the user, and verifying the data being exchanged. You need to
provide the CA server using the CRYPT_SESSINFO_SERVER attribute and either a
user name and password using the CRYPT_SESSINFO_USERNAME and CRYPT_-
SESSINFO_PASSWORD attributes (for an Initialisation or Revocation request) or a
private signing key using the CRYPT_SESSINFO_PRIVATEKEY attribute (for a
Certificate or Key Update or Revocation request). Finally, you need to provide the
certificate of the issuing CA using the CRYPT_SESSINFO_CACERTIFICATE
attribute, the request type using the CRYPT_SESSINFO_CMP_REQUESTTYPE
attribute, and the request itself. Once all of this is done, you can activate the session
to request the certificate or revocation.
You can submit an Initialisation request and obtain an initial certificate from a CA as
follows:
CRYPT_SESSION cryptSession;
' Add the username and password or private signing key. Since this
' is an initialisation request, we add the user name and password.
cryptSetAttributeString cryptSession, CRYPT_SESSINFO_USERNAME, _
userName, Len( userName )
cryptSetAttributeString cryptSession, CRYPT_SESSINFO_PASSWORD, _
password, Len( password )
Obtaining Certificates using CMP 167
If the server that you’re communicating with is a cryptlib CMP server, the username
and password contain a built-in checksum mechanism which is used by cryptlib to
check for data entry errors. If cryptlib returns a CRYPT_ERROR_BADDATA when
you set the CRYPT_SESSINFO_USERNAME or CRYPT_SESSINFO_-
PASSWORD attributes then the user has made a mistake when they entered the name
or password. More details on the format and error checking process used for user
names and passwords is given in “PKI User Credentials” on page 184.
You can submit subsequent Certificate or Key Update requests to obtain further
certificates from a CA as follows:
CRYPT_SESSION cryptSession;
/* Add the username and password or private signing key. Since this is
a certification request, we add the private key */
crypt.SetAttribute( cryptSession, crypt.SESSINFO_PRIVATEKEY,
privateKey );
Once you’ve obtained the certificate, you should save it with the private key it’s
associated with as described in “Certificates and Keys” on page 155. Because CMP
is a complex protocol with a large number of variations and options, it can fail for a
variety of reasons. The error-handling techniques described in “Secure Sessions” on
page 102 may be useful in determining the exact nature of the problem.
The process involved in creating a request for use in SCEP is mostly identical to the
one for CMP, with a few differences as noted below. cryptlib also implements a full
SCEP server that allows you to issue certificates using SCEP. This process is
described in “Managing a CA using CMP or SCEP” on page 185.
SCEP Certificate Requests
SCEP uses a PKCS #10 certificate request object to handle requests for certificates.
The creation of a PKCS #10 certificate request of type CRYPT_CERTTYPE_-
CERTREQUEST follows the general pattern for certificate requests given earlier in
“The Certification Process” on page 157 and is as follows:
CRYPT_CERTIFICATE cryptCertRequest;
Note that, unlike CMP requests, the SCEP request isn’t signed. This is because
cryptlib has to fill in further details in the request as part of the SCEP message
exchange process.
SCEP Operation Types
The SCEP protocol provides for two different certificate issue operations, which are
as follows:
Operation Description
CRYPT_REQUESTTYPE_ Initial request to a CA, protected by a user
INITIALISATION name and password supplied by the CA.
CRYPT_REQUESTTYPE_- Subsequent requests to the CA, protected by
CERTIFICATE a signature created with an existing CA-
certified key.
When you submit a SCEP request you need to specify the request type before you
activate the session. If it’s an Initialisation then the session is authenticated using a
user name and password that was previously obtained from the CA. If it’s a
Certificate then the session is authenticated using a signature created with a key that
was previously certified by the CA.
SCEP Sessions
Once a PKCS #10 request has been prepared, it’s ready for submission to the CA.
This is done via a SCEP session object, which manages the details of communicating
with the CA, authenticating the user, and verifying the data being exchanged. You
need to provide the CA server using the CRYPT_SESSINFO_SERVER attribute and
a user name using the CRYPT_SESSINFO_USERNAME attribute. For an
Initialisation request you also need to provide a password using the CRYPT_-
SESSINFO_PASSWORD attribute. The SCEP protocol restricts user names to basic
alphanumeric values and a few punctuation characters. If you’re using a user name
from a cryptlib server then this will be in the required format, if you haven’t been
given a user name to use or the name that you’ve got doesn’t meet the requirements
for the SCEP protocol then you can set the special-case value [Autodetect] and
cryptlib will automatically determine and generate a value for you.
In addition you need to supply the private key that was used to create the request
using the CRYPT_SESSINFO_PRIVATEKEY attribute. The private key is never
sent to the server, but is used to for signing and encryption purposes by the SCEP
client. Finally, you may need to provide the certificate of the issuing CA if the CA
doesn’t make it available as part of the SCEP exchange using the CRYPT_-
SESSINFO_CACERTIFICATE attribute, the request type using the CRYPT_-
SESSINFO_CMP_REQUESTTYPE attribute, and the request itself. Once all of this
is done, you can activate the session to obtain the certificate:
CRYPT_SESSION cryptSession;
' Add the certificate of the CA who is to issue the certificate and
the request itself
cryptSetAttribute cryptSession, CRYPT_SESSINFO_CACERTIFICATE, _
cryptCACert
cryptSetAttribute cryptSession, CRYPT_SESSINFO_REQUEST, _
cryptRequest
Adding the certificate of the issuing CA is optional, cryptlib will try and retrieve it
when it communicates with the SCEP server, but not all servers make this
information available and, unlike CMP, the authenticity of the CA’s certificate isn’t
verified by the protocol. If you have a copy of the CA certificate available it’s better
to add it explicitly than to rely on it being fetched when the SCEP session starts.
If the server that you’re communicating with is a cryptlib SCEP server, the username
and password contain a built-in checksum mechanism which is used by cryptlib to
check for data entry errors. If cryptlib returns a CRYPT_ERROR_BADDATA when
you set the CRYPT_SESSINFO_USERNAME or CRYPT_SESSINFO_-
PASSWORD attributes then the user has made a mistake when they entered the name
or password. More details on the format and error checking process used for user
names and passwords is given in “Managing a CA using CMP or SCEP” on page
185.
Unlike CMP, SCEP can only certify keys capable of both encryption and signing,
which means that you can only certify RSA keys with no usage restrictions that
would limit them to being used only for encryption or only for signing. The returned
certificate will contain a combined key usage allowing both encryption and signing.
The SCEP CA certificate must also be capable of encryption and signing, which isn’t
normally done with a CA certificate but is required by the SCEP protocol. If you add
a CA certificate or private key that isn’t capable of both encryption and signing,
cryptlib will return a CRYPT_ERROR_PARAM3 to indicate that the CA certificate
or key can’t be used for SCEP.
If the session is successfully activated the SCEP object will contain the response from
the CA, which will be a newly-issued certificate that you can read from the session as
a CRYPT_SESSINFO_RESPONSE attribute:
Certificate Status Checking using RTCS 171
CRYPT_CERTIFICATE cryptCertificate;
int status;
Once you’ve obtained the certificate, you should save it with the private key it’s
associated with as described in “Certificates and Keys” on page 155. Because SCEP
is a complex protocol with a large number of variations and options, it can fail for a
variety of reasons. The error-handling techniques described in “Secure Sessions” on
page 102 may be useful in determining the exact nature of the problem.
SCEP implements an optional capability in which the CA doesn’t return the
certificate immediately but has the client wait for it to be issued. cryptlib will
indicate this pending response via the (slightly misnamed) CRYPT_ENVELOPE_-
RESOURCE status. If you receive this status when you activate the session, you
need to periodically poll the CA to see if it’s issued the certificate yet:
/* Activate the session */
status = cryptSetAttribute( cryptSession, CRYPT_SESSINFO_ACTIVE,
TRUE );
while( status == CRYPT_ENVELOPE_RESOURCE )
{
/* Wait awhile */
/* … */
Note that the RTCS session isn’t activated in the usual manner by setting the
CRYPT_SESSINFO_ACTIVE attribute to true, since this is done by
cryptCheckCert when it performs the validity check.
If cryptCheckCert returns OK this means that the certificate is valid right now. If it
returns CRYPT_ERROR_INVALID (or some other error) the certificate isn’t valid,
either because it has expired, has been revoked, is a forged certificate, or for some
other reason. Usually all that matters is whether a certificate is OK to use or not, but
if you require detailed information as to why a certificate isn’t OK to use you need to
perform a manual RTCS check without the help of cryptCheckCert, as described
below.
Creating an RTCS Request
Performing an RTCS status check without the help of cryptCheckCert involves
creating an RTCS request object, adding a copy of the certificate to be checked to the
request, submitting the request to the RTCS responder and receiving the responder’s
reply, and finally checking the certificate’s status in the RTCS reply:
create RTCS request;
add certificate to be checked to request;
exchange data with RTCS responder;
check certificate using RTCS response;
Sometimes a user’s certificate will contain the information required for cryptlib to
communicate with the responder, but often this is missing or incorrect. You can
check for the presence of RTCS information in the certificate by checking for the
existence of the CRYPT_CERTINFO_AUTHORITYINFO_RTCS attribute, which
contains information about the RTCS responder, usually in the form of a URL. If you
want to read the location of the responder, you can obtain it by reading the
CRYPT_CERTINFO_UNIFORMRESOURCEIDENTIFIER attribute from within
the RTCS information. Since the RTCS attribute is a composite GeneralName field,
you need to first select it and then read the URL from within the GeneralName:
char url[ CRYPT_MAX_TEXTSIZE + 1 ];
int urlLength;
If the RTCS responder location isn’t present or is incorrect, you’ll need to add the
responder URL manually before you can submit the request, as explained in the next
section.
Certificate Status Checking using RTCS 173
/* Add the RTCS request and activate the session with the RTCS
responder */
cryptSetAttribute( cryptSession, CRYPT_SESSINFO_REQUEST,
cryptRTCSRequest );
status = cryptSetAttribute( cryptSession, CRYPT_SESSINFO_ACTIVE,
TRUE );
if( cryptStatusError( status ) )
/* Couldn't establish session with RTCS responder */;
/* Clean up the RTCS request object, which isn't needed any more */
cryptDestroyCert( cryptRTCSRequest );
Once you’ve got the response from the server, you can get the certificate status from
it by reading the CRYPT_CERTINFO_CERTSTATUS attribute:
int certStatus;
/* Add the responder URL and RTCS request and activate the session
with the RTCS responder */
cryptSetAttributeString( cryptSession, CRYPT_SESSINFO_SERVER_NAME,
serverName, serverNameLength );
cryptSetAttribute( cryptSession, CRYPT_SESSINFO_REQUEST,
cryptRTCSRequest );
/* ... */
/* The certificate has been revoked, get the revocation time and
reason */
cryptGetAttributeString( cryptRTCSResponse,
CRYPT_CERTINFO_REVOCATIONDATE, &revocationTime,
&revocationTimeLength );
cryptGetAttribute( cryptRTCSResponse, CRYPT_CERTINFO_CRLREASON,
&revocationReason );
}
cryptSetAttribute( cryptRTCSResponse,
CRYPT_CERTINFO_CURRENT_CERTIFICATE, CRYPT_CURSOR_FIRST );
do
{
int certStatus;
if( !certsValid )
/* At least one certificate is invalid */;
This will step through all of the responses checking for an indication that a certificate
is invalid. Once the loop terminates, the certsValid variable will contain the
composite status of the complete set of certificates.
Certificate Revocation Checking using OCSP 175
As with RTCS requests, the certificate being queried may contain responder details in
the CRYPT_CERTINFO_AUTHORITYINFO_OCSP attribute, or you may need to
add them manually as explained in “Creating an RTCS Request” on page 172.
OCSP requests can also be signed, if you’re working with a CA that uses this
capability then you can sign the request before submitting it in the standard way using
cryptSignCert:
CRYPT_CERTIFICATE cryptOCSPRequest;
OCSP requests can also include signing certificates alongside the signature, you can
specify the amount of additional information to include with the signature by setting
the CRYPT_CERTINFO_SIGNATURELEVEL attribute as described in
“Signing/Verifying Certificates” on page 232.
Communicating with an OCSP Responder
Communicating with an OCSP responder works in exactly the same way as
communicating with an RTCS responder described in “Communicating with an
RTCS Responder” on page 173, except that the session type is CRYPT_SESSION_-
OCSP rather than CRYPT_SESSION_RTCS. Once you’ve successfully activated the
session, you can read the certificate revocation status from the returned OCSP
response by reading the CRYPT_CERTINFO_REVOCATIONSTATUS attribute:
176 Certificates and Certificate Management
int revocationStatus;
CRYPT_CERTIFICATE cryptOCSPResponse;
time_t revocationTime;
int revocationReason;
/* The certificate has been revoked, get the revocation time and
reason */
cryptGetAttributeString( cryptOCSPResponse,
CRYPT_CERTINFO_REVOCATIONDATE, &revocationTime,
&revocationTimeLength );
cryptGetAttribute( cryptOCSPResponse, CRYPT_CERTINFO_CRLREASON,
&revocationReason );
}
Note that, as with standard CRLs, the revocation reason is an optional component and
may not be present in the OCSP response. If the revocation reason isn’t present,
cryptlib will return CRYPT_ERROR_NOTFOUND. If all you’re interested in is a
revoked/not revoked status for a collection of certificates then you can step through
the responses checking the status for each one in turn in the same way as for RTCS.
/* Add the certificate being checked and activate the session with the
SCVP server */
cryptSetAttribute( cryptSession, CRYPT_SESSINFO_REQUEST,
cryptCertificate );
status = cryptSetAttribute( cryptSession, CRYPT_SESSINFO_ACTIVE,
TRUE );
if( cryptStatusError( status ) )
/* Read SCVP error status from the SCVP session object */;
178 Certificates and Certificate Management
As mentioned above, you may need to set the SCVP responder URL if it isn’t present
in the certificate or if the value given in the certificate is incorrect. You can set the
responder URL as the CRYPT_SESSINFO_SERVER_NAME:
CRYPT_SESSION cryptSession;
/* Add the SCVP serer URL and certificate and activate the session
with the SCVP server */
cryptSetAttributeString( cryptSession, CRYPT_SESSINFO_SERVER_NAME,
serverName, serverNameLength );
cryptSetAttribute( cryptSession, CRYPT_SESSINFO_REQUEST,
cryptCertificate );
/* ... */
This code actually does a bit more than just performing a basic check since it returns
not only a validity status but also the currently-valid certificate, which may be newer
than the one that you’re querying (for example if the one that you currently have has
expired, or is about to expire, and has been replaced by a newer one). You can then
decide whether you want to use the existing certificate or the (possibly) more up-to-
date one that’s been returned by the query.
Creating the Top-level (Root) CA Key 179
CRYPT_CONTEXT cryptContext;
/* Create an RSA public/private key context, set a label for it, and
generate a key into it */
cryptCreateContext( &cryptContext, cryptUser /* CRYPT_UNUSED */,
CRYPT_ALGO_RSA );
cryptSetAttributeString( cryptContext, CRYPT_CTXINFO_LABEL,
"Private key", 11 );
cryptGenerateKey( cryptContext );
More details on keys and key generation are given in “Key Generation and Storage”
on page 135.
Once you’ve generated the key, you can create the root CA certificate and add the
CA’s identification information to it, which usually consists of the country,
organisation name, organisational unit name, and finally the actual CA name, referred
to as the common name in PKI terminology:
CRYPT_CERTIFICATE cryptCertificate;
Finally, you may want to add two URLs that indicate to users where further CA
services may be found, in particular CRYPT_CERTINFO_AUTHORITYINFO_-
CERTSTORE to tell users where to go to find further certificates and CRYPT_-
CERTINFO_AUTHORITYINFO_RTCS to tell users where to go for real-time
certificate status information: Since these attributes are a composite GeneralName
field, you need to first select them and then add the URL as a CRYPT_CERTINFO_-
UNIFORMRESOURCEIDENTIFIER attribute within the GeneralName:
cryptSetAttribute( cryptCertificate, CRYPT_ATTRIBUTE_CURRENT,
CRYPT_CERTINFO_AUTHORITYINFO_CERTSTORE );
cryptSetAttributeString( cryptCertificate,
CRYPT_CERTINFO_UNIFORMRESOURCEIDENTIFIER, certstoreUrl,
certstoreUrlLength );
cryptSetAttribute( cryptCertificate, CRYPT_ATTRIBUTE_CURRENT,
CRYPT_CERTINFO_AUTHORITYINFO_RTCS );
cryptSetAttributeString( cryptCertificate,
CRYPT_CERTINFO_UNIFORMRESOURCEIDENTIFIER, rtcsUrl, rtcsUrlLength );
With the URLs present in the resulting certificate, users will automatically know
where to go to obtain further certificate-related information.
You can also set these URLs on a per-user basis when you set up each user’s
information, although putting it in the CA certificate allows you to set it just once
without having to set it up for each user (cryptlib will automatically propagate it from
the CA certificate to the user certificates when they’re issued). More details on
HTTP certificate storage mechanism access are given in “HTTP Keysets” on page
Initialising PKI User Information 181
140, and details on real-time certificate status checking are given in “Certificate
Status Checking using RTCS” on page 171.
Your root CA certificate is now ready to be signed:
cryptSignCert( cryptCertificate, cryptContext );
If you’re storing the CA information on disk, you now need to save the keys and
certificates to a password-protected private-key file:
CRYPT_KEYSET cryptKeyset;
/* Clean up */
cryptDestroyContext( cryptContext );
cryptDestroyCert( cryptCertificate );
If you’re storing the information in a crypto device, the keys will already be in the
device, and all you need to do is update it with the newly-created certificate:
cryptAddPublicKey( cryptDevice, cryptCertificate );
/* Clean up */
cryptDestroyCert( cryptCertificate );
At this point your root CA key is ready to use for issuing certificates.
CRYPT_CERTIFICATE cryptPKIUser;
/* Clean up */
cryptDestroyCert( cryptPKIUser );
' Clean up
cryptDestroyCert cryptPKIUser
With the URL present in the resulting certificate, users will automatically know
where to go to obtain further certificates and certificate status information.
In addition to the CA-related information, you can also specify additional user
information that will appear in the issued certificate. The most common additional
information would be an email address that’s used to identify the user alongside their
DN:
cryptSetAttributeString( cryptPKIUser, CRYPT_CERTINFO_RFC822NAME,
emailAddr, emailAddrLength );
although since this may change over time you may want to let the user specify it in
their certificate request. A downside of this flexibility is that the user can then
request a certificate with any email address they want rather than the one that you’ve
got recorded for them.
As with the DN in a PKI user object, email addresses and URLs and related
information act as filters that constrain what a user can specify in a certificate request,
so that if a value like an email address is present in the PKI user object then the
request can contain either no email address (in which case it’ll be filled in from the
PKI user data) or one that matches the one in the PKI user data, but not some
arbitrary value specified by the user.
In addition to the standard identification information, you can also specify other
information that should appear in all certificates issued to this particular user. One
piece of certificate information that can only be specified in the PKI user data is
whether the user is to be a CA or not. To create a CA user, you set the CA flag for
the user:
cryptSetAttribute( cryptPKIUser, CRYPT_CERTINFO_CA, 1 );
This is the only way in which a CA certificate can be issued, since allowing a user to
specify the issuing of a CA certificate in a user request would allow any user to make
themselves a CA. If cryptlib receives a request from a user for the creation of a CA
certificate it will reject the request.
Because a CA-enabled user has special privileges, you should take extra care in
managing passwords and related information for them, and may want to delete the
user after their CA certificate has been issued to prevent them from being re-used to
184 Managing a Certification Authority
obtain further CA certificates. This makes the sub-CA creation capability a one-shot
process that requires explicit manual intervention by the issuing CA every time a sub-
CA is created.
As an alternative to making a user a CA user, you can make them a registration
authority (RA) user. An RA can be used to authorise the issuing of certificates by a
CA, but can’t issue certificates itself. RAs are usually used because of operational
requirements in which the CA is dedicated purely to issuing certificates and the RA
performs any necessary checking of the user information before it’s turned into a
certificate.
To make a PKI user an RA, you need to set the CRYPT_CERTINFO_PKIUSER_RA
attribute:
cryptSetAttribute( cryptPKIUser, CRYPT_CERTINFO_CA, 1 );
As with the CA flag, this can only be specified in the PKI user data. Since an RA as
almost as powerful as a CA (and probably even more dangerous, since it has all of the
CA’s powers but none of its responsibilities), you need to be very careful in your use
of RAs and RA capabilities.
PKI User Credentials
Certificate initialisation requests are identified a set of credentials consisting of a user
ID (to locate the appropriate PKI user information) and a password (to authenticate
the request). Once the user information has been entered into the certificate store,
you can read back the PKI user ID, identified by CRYPT_CERTINFO_-
PKIUSER_ID, the password used to authenticate the certificate issuing operation,
identified by CRYPT_CERTINFO_PKIUSER_ISSUEPASSWORD, and the
password used to authenticate certificate revocation (if you’re using CMP),
CRYPT_CERTINFO_PKIUSER_REVPASSWORD. Use of the revocation
password is optional, the CA may use signed revocation requests rather than
password-protected ones:
char userID[ CRYPT_MAX_TEXTSIZE + 1 ];
char issuePW[ CRYPT_MAX_TEXTSIZE + 1 ];
char revPW[ CRYPT_MAX_TEXTSIZE + 1 ];
int userIDlength, issuePWlength, revPWlength;
The CA needs to communicate this information to the user via some out-of-band
means, typically via direct communication before or during the certificate sign-up
process. Once this information is communicated, the user can use their credentials to
obtain an initial certificate. Any further certificates are typically obtained by signing
the request with the initial certificate or with subsequently-obtained certificates,
although some protocols like SCEP may continue to use the password in subsequent
requests.
cryptlib uses a standard format for the user ID and password that follows the style
used for software registration codes and serial numbers. The user ID is in the form
XXXXX-XXXXX-XXXXX and the password is in the form XXXXX-XXXXX-
XXXXX-XXXXX. Characters that might cause confusion (for example O and 0 or 1
and l) aren’t present, and the data contains a checksum which is used to catch typing
errors when the user enters the information. An example of a user ID and password
is:
Managing a CA using CMP or SCEP 185
user ID = 293XU-NZMSN-DC5J3
password = G3DKZ-DR79M-L6AGY-X6H6X
If the user enters either of these incorrectly, the cryptlib client will return
CRYPT_ERROR_BADDATA when you try to set the user name or password
attribute for the CMP or SCEP client session.
/* Add the CA certificate store and CA server key and activate the
session */
cryptSetAttribute( cryptSession, CRYPT_SESSINFO_KEYSET,
cryptCertStore );
cryptSetAttribute( cryptSession, CRYPT_SESSINFO_PRIVATEKEY,
privateKey );
cryptSetAttribute( cryptSession, CRYPT_SESSINFO_ACTIVE, 1 );
/* Add the CA certificate store and CA server key and activate the
session */
crypt.SetAttribute( cryptSession, crypt.SESSINFO_KEYSET,
cryptCertStore );
crypt.SetAttribute( cryptSession, crypt.SESSINFO_PRIVATEKEY,
privateKey );
crypt.SetAttribute( cryptSession, crypt.SESSINFO_ACTIVE, 1 );
' Add the CA certificate store and CA server key and activate the
' session
cryptSetAttribute cryptSession, CRYPT_SESSINFO_KEYSET, cryptCertStore
cryptSetAttribute cryptSession, CRYPT_SESSINFO_PRIVATEKEY, privateKey
cryptSetAttribute cryptSession, CRYPT_SESSINFO_ACTIVE, 1
Once you activate the session, cryptlib will block until an incoming client connection
arrives, at which point it will negotiate the certificate issue or revocation process with
186 Managing a Certification Authority
the client. All checking and certificate processing operations are taken care of by
cryptlib. There is no need for you to perform any further processing operations when
running a CA in this way, although you may want to occasionally perform some of
the maintenance operations described in “Managing a CA Directly” on page 188.
The CA certificate that you provide to a SCEP session must have the CRYPT_-
KEYUSAGE_DIGITALSIGNATURE and CRYPT_KEYUSAGE_-
KEYENCIPHERMENT key usage flags set alongside the usual CA ones, since the
SCEP protocol uses the CA’s key to perform general-purpose decryption and signing
operations as well as the expected usage of issuing certificates. When you create the
CA’s key you’ll need to explicitly set these additional usages since they’re never
normally set for CA keys. If you add the CRYPT_SESSION_PRIVATEKEY with an
associated certificate that doesn’t have these two key usage flags set alongside the CA
ones, cryptlib will return a CRYPT_ERROR_PARAM3 status. Alternatively, you
can use CMP instead of SCEP for issuing certificates, which uses the CA key in a
more standard manner.
If you plan to use the PKIBoot certificate bootstrap mechanism to communicate
trusted certificates to the user, you need to mark the certificates that you want cryptlib
to supply to the user as trusted certificates as described in “Certificate Trust
Management” on page 241. At a minimum, you should mark your CA’s certificates
as trusted to ensure that the user will get the CA certificates alongside their own
certificates when they have a certificate issued for them. In addition you can supply
additional certificates (for example ones for certificate status responders or timestamp
servers) to the user by marking them as trusted by the CA.
The cryptlib CMP and SCEP implementations run on top of a certificate store that
implements consistent transactions (as far as the underlying software and hardware
allows it), so that any incomplete CA transaction which is aborted by a software or
hardware failure or network error will be either cleanly rolled back if it hasn’t been
confirmed yet (for example a certificate issue request for which no acknowledgement
was received from the user) or completed if it was confirmed (for example a
revocation request that has been validated by cryptlib). This means that if (for
example) the server on which the CA is running crashes halfway through a revocation
operation, the revocation will be cleanly completed after the server is restarted. This
behaviour may differ from the behaviour exhibited by other CAs, which (depending
on CA policy) may simply abort all incomplete transactions, or may try and complete
some transactions.
In addition to ensuring transactional integrity, cryptlib also enforces certificate status
integrity constraints, which means that if it receives and successfully processes an
update request for a certificate, it will revoke the certificate that was being updated to
prevent two otherwise identical certificates from existing at the same time. As with
the other transaction types, the replacement operation is atomic so that either the new
certificate will cleanly replace the old one, or no overall change will take place.
Since the client-side of this session is a standard HTTP keyset, you can use it directly
in crypto operations like signed or encrypted enveloping:
CRYPT_ENVELOPE cryptEnvelope;
int bytesCopied;
/* Add the data size information and data, wrap up the processing, and
pop out the processed data */
cryptSetAttribute( cryptEnvelope, CRYPT_ENVINFO_DATASIZE,
messageLength );
cryptPushData( cryptEnvelope, message, messageLength, &bytesCopied );
cryptFlushData( cryptEnvelope );
cryptPopData( cryptEnvelope, envelopedData, envelopedDataBufferSize,
&bytesCopied );
cryptDestroyEnvelope( cryptEnvelope );
Although the interface is identical to the standard enveloping interface with a local
keyset, in this case cryptlib is fetching the certificate that’s required for encryption
from the remote CA. Having the keyset available online and managed directly by the
CA avoids requiring each user to manage their own individual store of certificates,
and allows a single consistent certificate collection to be maintained at a central
location.
For both security and performance reasons, you should always open the keyset in
read-only mode and access it as a general certificate keyset (CRYPT_KEYSET_-
DATABASE) rather than a CA certificate store (CRYPT_KEYSET_DATABASE_-
STORE). cryptlib will check to make sure that it’s a read-only standard keyset when
you add it to the session, and return a CRYPT_ERROR_PARAM3 error if it’s of the
incorrect type.
For additional security, you can apply standard database security measures to protect
the certificate database against (potentially malicious) access. Some ways of doing
this include using the database’s REVOKE/GRANT capability to allow only
SELECT access (read-only, no write or update capability), and accessing the database
as a low-privilege user with only read access. cryptlib will automatically use the
lowest level of access available to perform the task, in this case minimal read-only
access combined with basic SELECT point queries (no views, joins, or other
complexity). Finally, cryptlib both filters its input data and uses parameterised
queries/bound query data to prevent hostile users from inserting malicious escape
sequences into the query.
The CRYPT_SESSION_CERTSTORE_SERVER server type employs cryptlib as
little more than a web interface to a certificate store. Since most databases are web-
enabled, a simpler option is to use the database itself to provide certificate access to
users — it’s just a straight HTTP query of the database. This means that you can
188 Managing a Certification Authority
create standalone HTTP certificate store servers using nothing more than the database
engine that you use to store the certificates.
Managing a CA Directly
In addition to the mostly-automated process of running a CA via CMP or SCEP,
cryptlib also lets you manage a CA directly using various certificate management
operations. This process isn’t as convenient as using CMP or SCEP since a lot of the
automation provided by cryptlib’s automated CA handling is lost by working at this
lower level.
A CA issues certificates and certificate revocations in response to requests from
users, so that when an incoming request arrives the first thing you need to do is store
it in the certificate store so that cryptlib can work with it. After that you can use the
CA management functions to convert the request into a certificate or revocation and
optionally return the result of the operation to the user.
Recording Incoming Requests
To store an incoming request you use cryptCAAddItem, which takes the request and
adds it to the store, updating the audit log and performing any other necessary
management operations. Once it’s stored, cryptlib generates a log entry recording the
arrival of the request and can use it to recover the request or any subsequent data such
as certificates created from it even in the event of a system crash or failure, so that no
information will be lost once it has entered the store:
CRYPT_CERTIFICATE cryptCertRequest;
Once this process has been completed the request has been entered into the store and
will be subject to the CA management operations provided by cryptlib. This step
must be completed before the certificate management process can be applied to the
request, even if it’ll immediately be used to generate a certificate or revocation, since
it’s needed to ensure that the operation of the CA can be recovered and continued in
the event of a software or system failure.
Retrieving Stored Requests
Once a request has been recorded in the store, some time may elapse before it can be
processed, during which time the certificate object that contains the request may be
destroyed. When the certificate is ready for issue, you can recreate the request by
retrieving it from the store using cryptCAGetItem in the same way that you can use
cryptGetPublicKey to obtain a certificate from a standard certificate store:
CRYPT_CERTIFICATE cryptCertRequest;
Once the request has been recreated, you can subject it to the CA management
process in the usual manner.
CA Management Operations
cryptlib provides a wide variety of CA management operations that include issuing
and revoking certificates and creating CRLs, as well as general management
operations such as clearing up expired certificates and CRL entries. All of these
operations are performed by cryptlib using cryptCACertManagement with no
further input necessary from the user. The general concept of the certificate
management function is:
CRYPT_CERTIFICATE cryptCertificate;
with some of the parameters being optional depending on the type of action being
performed. The certificate management actions that can be performed are:
Cert Management Action Description
CRYPT_CERTACTION_- Remove all expired certificates from the active
EXPIRE_CERT certificate collection and remove all expired
CRL entries from the active CRL entry
collection in the certificate store.
CRYPT_CERTACTION_- Perform certificate store cleanup/recovery
CLEANUP actions after a restart (for example a system
crash), processing or deleting any leftover
incomplete actions as appropriate.
CRYPT_CERTACTION_- Issue a certificate by signing a certificate
ISSUE_CERT request with the given CA key, updating the
certificate store to contain the newly-issued
certificate.
CRYPT_CERTACTION_- Issue a CRL for the CA indicated by the given
ISSUE_CRL CA key.
CRYPT_CERTACTION_- Revoke the certificate indicated in the
REVOKE_CERT revocation request. Since submitting the
corresponding revocation request requires
interaction with the CMP protocol this action
can’t be performed directly but is initiated in
conjunction with CMP.
The first parameter for the function can optionally return the newly-issued certificate
or CRL, if you don’t want to do anything with this at the current time you can set it to
null and read it later with cryptGetPublicKey. In all cases cryptlib will carry out the
operations in a safe, all-or-nothing manner that leaves the certificate store in a
consistent state after the operation has completed. This guarantees the reliable
operation of the CA even in the presence of hardware or software failures in the
underlying components.
The details of each type of CA management operation are given in the following
sections.
Issuing and revoking a Certificate
The process of issuing a certificate converts a previously stored certificate request
into a certificate via the certificate store. To issue a certificate, you need to provide a
certificate store, a CA key to use to sign the certificate, and a copy of the (previously
stored) certificate request:
190 Managing a Certification Authority
CRYPT_CERTIFICATE cryptCertificate;
Once the operation has completed, the new certificate will be available as the
cryptCertificate value.
Revoking a certificate works in a similar manner, except that it takes a revocation
request rather than a certificate request. Since this operation updates the certificate
store without creating any kind of certificate object, the first parameter is set to null:
cryptCACertManagement( NULL, CRYPT_CERTACTION_REVOKE_CERT,
cryptCertStore, cryptCAKey, cryptRevocationRequest );
This operation requires the use of a revocation request that can only be processed as
part of the CMP protocol, so it’s not possible to directly submit a revocation request
to the store.
Issuing a CRL
The process of issuing a CRL takes the revocation information held in the certificate
store and turns it into a finished CRL. To issue a CRL, you need to provide a
certificate store and a CA key (specifically, one capable of signing CRLs) to use to
sign the CRL. Since there’s no request involved, the request parameter is set to
CRYPT_UNUSED. If you try to use a CA key that can’t sign CRLs, cryptlib will
return CRYPT_ERROR_PARAM4 to indicate that the key is invalid for issuing
CRLs:
CRYPT_CERTIFICATE cryptCRL;
The CA key must be the one that issued the certificates that are in the CRL (this is a
requirement of the way certificates in CRLs are identified). If you try and use a key
from a different CA, the resulting CRL will either be empty (since no revocation
entries for the other CA will be present) or will contain only entries for the other CA
(if both CAs are sharing the same certificate store, and entries from the other CA are
present in it).
Expiring Certificates
Expiring certificates is a passive process that doesn’t create or destroy any certificate
objects, but merely updates the certificate store state information so that expired
certificates are no longer considered active. You can run this as a background or low-
priority operation at periodic intervals to keep the certificate store up to date:
cryptCACertManagement( &cryptCRL, CRYPT_CERTACTION_EXPIRE_CERT,
cryptCertStore, CRYPT_UNUSED, CRYPT_UNUSED );
This will remove any expired certificates from the store and also removes any CRL
entries for certificates that have expired anyway. Depending on your CA’s policy on
expiry you can run this frequently to ensure only current certificates and CRL entries
are present or less frequently in case there’s some reason to keep expired certificates
around.
Recovering after a Restart
Sometimes the machine on which you’re running your CA may go down due to
problems like a hardware failure or a system crash. cryptlib carries out all operations
in a manner that ensures the certificate store won’t be left in an inconsistent state, but
having the machine die in the middle of an update can leave some requests in an
incomplete state (for example if an incoming request is received and system power is
lost before the corresponding certificate is issued, the unprocessed request will be left
in the certificate store). In order to clean up any leftover requests you can tell cryptlib
to clean up the state of the certificate store by removing or processing any leftover
requests as appropriate:
Managing a CA Directly 191
If a pending request hasn’t been approved yet, it will be rolled back; if a request has
been approved but wasn’t fully processed, it will be completed.
In general it’s a good idea to perform this action when you start your CA (if you shut
it down for any reason), and you should do it if there’s a system failure or other
problem that causes the CA to shut down without cleaning up. Note that you should
never perform this operation while the CA is running, since it’ll clean up any
currently un-processed requests and operations, including ones that may currently be
awaiting processing by the CA.
192 Encryption and Decryption
cryptDestroyContext( cryptContext );
The context will use the default encryption mode of CBC, which is the most secure
and efficient encryption mode. If you want to use a different mode, you can set the
context’s CRYPT_CTXINFO_MODE attribute to specify the mode to use. For
example to change the encryption mode used from CBC to CFB you would use:
cryptSetAttribute( cryptContext, CRYPT_CTXINFO_MODE, CRYPT_MODE_CFB );
In general you shouldn’t need to change the encryption mode, the other cryptlib
functions will automatically handle the mode choice for you. Public-key, hash, and
MAC contexts work in the same way, except that they don’t have different modes of
use so the CRYPT_CTXINFO_MODE attribute isn’t present for these types of
contexts. The availability of certain algorithms and encryption modes in cryptlib
does not mean that their use is recommended. Some are only present because they
are needed for certain protocols or required by some standards.
Note that the CRYPT_CONTEXT is passed to cryptCreateContext by reference, as
cryptCreateContext modifies it when it creates the encryption context. In almost all
other cryptlib routines, CRYPT_CONTEXT is passed by value. The contexts that
will be created are standard cryptlib contexts, to create a context which is handled via
a crypto device such as a smart card or Fortezza card, you should use
cryptDeviceCreateContext, which tells cryptlib to create a context in a crypto
Generating a Key into an Encryption Context 193
device. The use of crypto devices is explained in “Encryption Devices and ” on page
277.
cryptDestroyContext has a generic equivalent function cryptDestroyObject that
takes a CRYPT_HANDLE parameter instead of a CRYPT_CONTEXT. This is
intended for use with objects that are referred to using generic handles, but can also
be used to specifically destroy encryption contexts — cryptlib’s object management
routines will automatically sort out what to do with the handle or object.
which will generate a key of a size which is appropriate for the encryption algorithm.
If you want to generate a key of a particular length, you can set the CRYPT_-
CTXINFO_KEYSIZE attribute before calling cryptGenerateKey. For example to
generate a 256-bit (32-byte) key you would use:
cryptSetAttribute( cryptContext, CRYPT_CTXINFO_KEYSIZE, 256 / 8 );
cryptGenerateKey( cryptContext );
/* Encrypt data */
cryptDestroyContext( cryptContext );
Once a key is generated into a context, you can’t load or generate a new key over the
top of it or change the encryption mode (for conventional encryption contexts). If
you try to do this, cryptlib will return CRYPT_ERROR_INITED to indicate that a
key is already loaded into the context.
ensure that the key is different each time (so even if you reuse the same password
multiple times, the key obtained from it will change each time). This ensures that
even if one password-based key is compromised, all the others remain secure.
The salt attribute is identified by CRYPT_CTXINFO_KEYING_SALT and ranges in
length from 64 bits (8 bytes) up to CRYPT_MAX_HASHSIZE. Using an 8-byte salt
is a good choice. The keying information attribute is identified by CRYPT_-
CTXINFO_KEYING_VALUE and can be of any length. To derive a key into a
context you would use:
cryptSetAttributeString( cryptContext, CRYPT_CTXINFO_KEYING_SALT,
salt, saltLength );
cryptSetAttributeString( cryptContext, CRYPT_CTXINFO_KEYING_VALUE,
passPhrase, passPhraseLength );
which takes the supplied passphrase and salt and converts them into an encryption
key in a format suitable for use with the encryption context. Use of the key
derivation capability is strongly recommended over loading keys directly into an
encryption context by setting the CRYPT_CTXINFO_KEY attribute since this often
requires intimate knowledge of algorithm details such as how keys of different
lengths are handled, how key bits are used, special considerations for key material,
and so on.
Note that you have to set a salt value before you set the keying information attribute.
If you don’t supply a salt, cryptlib will return CRYPT_ERROR_NOTINITED when
you try to supply the keying information to indicate that the salt hasn’t been set yet.
If you don’t want to manage a unique salt value per key, you can set the salt to a fixed
value (for example 64 bits of zeroes), although this is strongly discouraged since it
means each use of the password will produce the same encryption key.
By default the key derivation process will repeatedly hash the input salt and keying
information with the HMAC MAC function to generate the key, and will iterate the
hashing process a larger number of times to make a passphrase-guessing attack more
difficult2. If you want to change these values you can set the CRYPT_CTXINFO_-
KEYING_ALGO and CRYPT_CTXINFO_KEYING_ITERATIONS attributes for
the context before setting the salt and keying information attributes. For example to
change the number of iterations to 10000 before setting the salt and key you would
use:
cryptSetAttribute( cryptContext, CRYPT_CTXINFO_KEYING_ITERATIONS,
10000 );
cryptSetAttributeString( cryptContext, CRYPT_CTXINFO_KEYING_SALT,
salt, saltLength );
cryptSetAttributeString( cryptContext, CRYPT_CTXINFO_KEYING_VALUE,
passPhrase, passPhraseLength );
cryptlib will then use this value when deriving the key. You can also change the
default hash algorithm and iteration count using the cryptlib configuration options
CRYPT_OPTION_KEYING_ALGO and CRYPT_OPTION_KEYING_-
ITERATIONS as explained in “Working with Configuration Options” on page 287.
To summarise the steps so far, you can set up an encryption context in its simplest
form so that it’s ready to encrypt data with:
CRYPT_CONTEXT cryptContext;
/* Encrypt data */
cryptDestroyContext( cryptContext );
2
It actually does a lot more than just hashing the passphrase, including performing processing steps designed to
defeat various sophisticated attacks on the key-hashing process.
Loading a Key into an Encryption Context 195
Since public-key encryption uses a different type of key than other context types, you
can’t derive a key into a public or private key context.
Once a key is derived into a context, you can’t load or generate a new key over the
top of it or change the encryption mode (for conventional encryption contexts). If
you try to do this, cryptlib will return CRYPT_ERROR_INITED to indicate that a
key is already loaded into the context.
Unless you need to perform low-level key management yourself, you should avoid
loading keys directly in this manner. The previous key load should really have been
done by setting the CRYPT_CTXINFO_KEYING_SALT and CRYPT_CTXINFO_-
KEYING_VALUE attributes to derive the key into the context.
For public-key encryption a key will typically have a number of components so you
can’t set the key directly. More information on working with CRYPT_PKCINFO
data structures is given in “Loading Public/Private Keys” on page 196.
Once a key is loaded into a context, you can’t load or generate a new key over the top
of it or change the encryption mode (for conventional encryption contexts). If you try
to do this, cryptlib will return CRYPT_ERROR_INITED to indicate that a key is
already loaded into the context.
If you need to reserve space for conventional and public/private keys, you can use the
CRYPT_MAX_KEYSIZE, CRYPT_MAX_PKCSIZE, and CRYPT_MAX_-
PKCSIZE_ECC defines to determine the mount of memory you need. No key used
by cryptlib will ever need more storage than the settings given in these defines. Note
that the CRYPT_MAX_PKCSIZE and CRYPT_MAX_PKCSIZE_ECC values
specify the maximum size of an individual key component. Since public/private keys
are usually composed of a number of components the overall size is larger than this.
To retrieve the IV that you have loaded or that has been generated for you by cryptlib
you read the value of the attribute:
unsigned char iv[ CRYPT_MAX_IVSIZE ];
int ivSize;
Trying to get or set the value of this attribute will return the error code CRYPT_-
ERROR_NOTAVAIL for a hash, MAC, or public key encryption context or
conventional encryption context with an encryption mode that doesn’t use an IV to
indicate that these operations are not available for this type of context.
If you need to reserve space for IVs, you can use the CRYPT_MAX_IVSIZE define
to determine the mount of memory you need. No IV used by cryptlib will ever need
more storage than the setting given in this define.
196 Encryption and Decryption
For example the number 123456789 would be stored in big-endian format as:
00000000000000000000000000000000000000000123456789
(with the remainder of the value padded with zeroes). In practice the numbers won’t
be stored with excessively long precision as they are in the above examples, so
instead of being stored with 50 digits of precision of which 41 bytes contain zero
padding, they would be stored with 9 digits of precision:
123456789
A multibyte integer therefore consists of two parameters, the data itself and the
precision to which it is stored, specified in bits. When you load multibyte integer
components into a CRYPT_PKCINFO structure you need to specify both of these
parameters.
Before you can use the CRYPT_PKCINFO structure, you need to initialise it with
cryptInitComponents(), which takes as parameters a pointer to the
Loading Public/Private Keys 197
Now you can load the multibyte integer strings by using cryptSetComponent(),
specifying a pointer to the value to be loaded, the multibyte integer data, and the
integer length in bits:
cryptSetComponent( ( &rsaKey )->n, modulus, 1024 );
cryptSetComponent( ( &rsaKey )->e, pubExponent, 17 );
cryptSetComponent( ( &rsaKey )->d, privExponent, 1024 );
When loading key components, cryptlib performs a validity check on the data to
detect invalid or suspicious key values. These can be used to compromise the
security of the key, for example to leak the private key in signatures made with it. If
cryptlib detects suspicious key components, it will return CRYPT_ERROR_-
PARAM3 to indicate that the key components are invalid.
The Diffie-Hellman, DSA, and Elgamal algorithms share the same key format and all
use the CRYPT_PKCINFO_DLP structure to store their key components. DLP is
short for Discrete Logarithm Problem, the common underlying mathematical
operation for the three cryptosystems.
You would load a public key into a DSA context with:
CRYPT_CONTEXT cryptContext;
CRYPT_PKCINFO_DLP *dlpKey;
The context is now ready to be used to verify a DSA signature on a piece of data. If
you wanted to load a DSA private key (which consists of one extra component), you
would add:
cryptSetComponent( dlpKey->x, ... );
after the y component is loaded. This context can then be used to sign a piece of data.
The ECDSA and ECDH algorithms share the same key format and all use the
CRYPT_PKCINFO_ECC structure to store their key components. ECC is short for
Elliptic Curve Cryptography, the common underlying mathematical operation for the
two cryptosystems.
You would load a public key (in this case one using the P256 named curve) into a
DSA context with:
198 Encryption and Decryption
CRYPT_CONTEXT cryptContext;
CRYPT_PKCINFO_ECC *eccKey;
The context is now ready to be used to verify an ECDSA signature on a piece of data.
If you wanted to load a ECDSA private key (which consists of one extra component),
you would add:
cryptSetComponent( eccKey->d, ... );
after the y component is loaded. This context can then be used to sign a piece of data.
For example to obtain the algorithm and mode used by an encryption context you
would use:
CRYPT_ALGO_TYPE cryptAlgo;
CRYPT_MODE_TYPE cryptMode;
Although these attributes are listed as context attributes, they also apply to anything
else that can act as a context action object, for example you can obtain algorithm,
mode, and key size values from a certificate since it can be used to encrypt or sign
just like a context:
CRYPT_ALGO_TYPE cryptAlgo;
CRYPT_MODE_TYPE cryptMode;
If any of the user-supplied attributes haven’t been set and you try to read their value,
cryptlib will return CRYPT_ERROR_NOTINITED.
and:
cryptDecrypt( cryptContext, buffer, length );
The data is encrypted in place, so that plaintext data is replaced by encrypted data and
vice versa. If the encryption context doesn’t support the operation you are trying to
perform (for example calling cryptEncrypt with a DSA or ECDSA public key), the
function will return CRYPT_ERROR_NOTAVAIL to indicate that this functionality
is not available. If the key loaded into an encryption context doesn’t allow the
operation you are trying to perform (for example calling cryptDecrypt with an
encrypt-only key), the function will return CRYPT_ERROR_PERMISSION to
indicate that the context doesn’t have the required key permissions to perform the
requested operation.
Conventional Encryption
If you’re using a block cipher in ECB or CBC mode, the encrypted data length must
be a multiple of the block size. If the encrypted data length is not a multiple of the
block size, the function will return CRYPT_ERROR_PARAM3 to indicate that the
length is invalid. To encrypt a byte at a time you should use a stream encryption
mode such as CFB, or better yet use an envelope which avoids the need to handle
algorithm-specific details.
If an IV is required for the decryption and you haven’t loaded one into the context by
setting the CRYPT_CTXINFO_IV attribute, cryptDecrypt will return CRYPT_-
ERROR_NOTINITED to indicate that you need to load an IV before you can decrypt
the data. If the first 8 bytes of decrypted data are corrupted then you haven’t set up
the IV properly for the decryption. More information on setting up IVs is given in
“Working with Initialisation Vectors” on page 195. The general concept behind
using IVs (in this case with automatic IV generation) is:
unsigned char iv[ CRYPT_MAX_IVSIZE ];
int ivSize;
/* Encrypt data */
cryptEncrypt( cryptContext, data, dataLength );
cryptGetAttributeString( cryptContext, CRYPT_CTXINFO_IV, iv, &ivSize
);
/* Decrypt data */
cryptSetAttributeString( cryptContext, CRYPT_CTXINFO_IV, iv, ivSize );
cryptDecrypt( cryptContext, data, dataLength )
Once an encryption context is set up, it can only be used for processing a single data
stream in an operation such as encrypting data, decrypting data, or hashing a
message. A context can’t be reused to encrypt a second message after the first one
has been encrypted, or to decrypt data after having encrypted data. This is because
the internal state of the context is determined by the operation being performed with
it, and performing two different operations with the same context causes the state
from the first operation to affect the second operation. For example if you use an
encryption context to encrypt two different files, cryptlib will see a single continuous
data stream (since it doesn’t know or care about the structure of the data being
encrypted). As a result the second file is treated as a continuation of the first one, and
can’t be decrypted unless the context is used to decrypt the first file before decrypting
the second one. Because of this you should always create a new encryption context
200 Encryption and Decryption
for each discrete data stream you will be processing, and never reuse contexts to
perform different operations. The one exception to this rule is when you’re using
cryptlib envelopes (described in “Data Enveloping” on page 53), where you can push
a single encryption context into as many envelopes as you like. This is because an
envelope takes its own copy of the encryption context, leaving the original
untouched.
In practice this isn’t strictly accurate, you can encrypt multiple independent data
streams with a single context by loading a new IV for each new stream using the
CRYPT_CTXINFO_IV attribute:
/* Set an IV and encrypt data */
cryptSetAttributeString( cryptContext, CRYPT_CTXINFO_IV, iv1,
iv1Length );
cryptEncrypt( cryptContext, data1, data1Length );
If you don’t understand how this would work then it’s probably best to use a new
context for each data stream.
Public-key Encryption
The public-key algorithms encrypt a single block of data equal in length to the size of
the public key being used. For example if you are using a 1024-bit public key then
the length of the data to be encrypted should be 128 bytes. If the encrypted data
length isn’t the same as the key size, the function will return CRYPT_ERROR_-
PARAM3 to indicate that the length is invalid. Preparation of the block of data to be
encrypted requires special care and is covered in appropriate security standards. If
cryptlib detects that it’s being passed incorrectly-formatted input data, it will return
CRYPT_ERROR_BADDATA to indicate that the data being passed to the
en/decryption function is invalid. In general you should use high-level functions such
as cryptExportKey/ cryptImportKey and cryptCreateSignature/
cryptCheckSignature rather than cryptEncrypt and cryptDecrypt when working
with public-key algorithms.
If you’re using a public or private key context which is tied to a certificate or crypto
device, the direct use of cryptEncrypt and cryptDecrypt could be used to bypass
security constraints placed on the context (for example by changing the data
formatting used with an encryption-only RSA private key context it’s possible to
misuse it to generate signatures even if the context is specifically intended for non-
signature use). Because of this, if a context is tied to a certificate or a crypto device,
it can’t be used directly with these low-level functions but only with a higher-level
function like cryptCreateSignature or with the enveloping code, which guarantee
that a context can’t be misused for a disallowed purpose. If you try to use a
constrained context of this type directly, the function will return CRYPT_ERROR_-
PERMISSION to indicate that the context doesn’t have the required permissions to
perform the requested operation, or CRYPT_ERROR_NOTAVAIL to indicate that
the key usage conditions set by the certificate don’t permit the key to be used for this
operation.
Hashing
Hash and MAC algorithms don’t actually encrypt the data being hashed and can be
called via cryptEncrypt or cryptDecrypt. They require a final call with the length
set to 0 as a courtesy call to indicate to the hash or MAC function that this is the last
data block and that the function should take whatever special action is necessary for
this case:
cryptEncrypt( hashContext, buffer, length );
cryptEncrypt( hashContext, buffer, 0 );
If you call cryptEncrypt or cryptDecrypt after making the final call with the length
set to 0, the function will return CRYPT_ERROR_COMPLETE to indicate that the
Using Encryption Contexts to Process Data 201
hashing has completed and cannot be continued. Once the hashing is complete, the
hash value is made available as the CRYPT_CTXINFO_HASHVALUE attribute that
you can read in the usual manner:
unsigned char hash[ CRYPT_MAX_HASHSIZE ];
int hashLength;
Exchanging Keys
Although you can encrypt/decrypt or MAC data with an encryption context, the key
you’re using is locked inside the context and (if you used cryptGenerateKey to
create it) won’t be known to you or the person you’re trying to communicate with.
To share the key with another party, you need to export it from the context in a secure
manner and the other party needs to import it into an encryption context of their own.
Because the key is a very sensitive and valuable resource, you can’t just read it out of
the context, but need to take special steps to protect the key once it leaves the context.
This is taken care of by the key export/import functions.
These functions deal only with the export and import of keys for conventional
encryption or MAC contexts. Public/private keys have specialised requirements and
can’t be exported directly in the same manner as conventional encryption or MAC
keys. Public keys, which are composite values consisting of multiple components,
must be converted into certificates in order to be shared with another party.
Certificates are covered in “Certificates and Certificate Management” on page 154.
Private keys can’t be exported as such, but can only be stored in keysets or crypto
devices. Keysets are covered in “Key Generation and Storage” on page 135, and
crypto devices are covered in “Encryption Devices and ” on page 277.
Exporting a Key
To exchange a conventional encryption or MAC key with another party, you use the
cryptExportKey and cryptImportKey functions in combination with a conventional
or public-key encryption context or public key certificate. Let’s say you’ve created a
key in an encryption context cryptContext and want to send it to someone whose
public key is in the encryption context pubKeyContext (you can also pass in a
private key if you want, cryptExportKey will only use the public key components).
To do this you’d use:
CRYPT_CONTEXT pubKeyContext, cryptContext;
void *encryptedKey;
int encryptedKeyLength;
/* Generate a key */
cryptCreateContext( &cryptContext, cryptUser /* CRYPT_UNUSED */,
CRYPT_ALGO_AES );
cryptGenerateKey( cryptContext );
The resulting public-key encrypted blob is placed in the memory buffer pointed to by
encryptedKey of maximum size encryptedKeyMaxLength, and the actual
length is stored in encryptedKeyLength. This leads to a small problem: How do
you know how big to make the buffer? The answer is to use cryptExportKey to tell
you. If you pass in a null pointer for encryptedKey, the function will set
encryptedKeyLength to the size of the resulting blob, but not do anything else.
You can then use code like:
cryptExportKey( NULL, 0, &encryptedKeyMaxLength, pubKeyContext,
cryptContext );
encryptedKey = malloc( encryptedKeyMaxLength );
cryptExportKey( encryptedKey, encryptedKeyMaxLength,
&encryptedKeyLength, pubKeyContext, cryptContext );
to create the exported key blob. Note that due to encoding issues for some algorithms
the final exported blob may be one or two bytes smaller than the size which is
initially reported, since the true size can’t be determined until the key is actually
exported. Alternatively, you can just reserve a reasonably sized block of memory and
use that to hold the encrypted key. “Reasonably sized” means a few Kb, a 4K block
Exporting a Key 203
is plenty (an encrypted key blob for a 1024-bit public key is only about 200 bytes
long).
You can also use a public key certificate to export a key. If, instead of a public key
context, you had a key certificate contained in the certificate object
cryptCertificate, the code for the previous example would become:
CRYPT_CERTIFICATE cryptCertificate;
CRYPT_CONTEXT cryptContext;
void *encryptedKey;
int encryptedKeyLength;
/* Generate a key */
cryptCreateContext( &cryptContext, cryptUser /* CRYPT_UNUSED */,
CRYPT_ALGO_AES );
cryptGenerateKey( cryptContext );
/* Generate a key */
cryptCreateContext( &cryptContext, cryptUser /* CRYPT_UNUSED */,
CRYPT_ALGO_AES );
cryptGenerateKey( cryptContext );
You don’t need to use a derived key to export the session key, you could have loaded
the context in some other manner (for example from a crypt device such as a smart
card), but the sample code shown above, and further on for the key import phase,
assumes that you’ll be deriving the export/import key from a password.
This kind of key export isn’t as convenient as using public keys since it requires that
both sides know the encryption key in keyContext (or at least know how to derive
it from some other keying material). One case where it’s useful is when you want to
encrypt data such as a disk file that will be decrypted later by the same person who
originally encrypted it. By prepending the key blob to the start of the encrypted file,
you can ensure that each file is encrypted with a different session key (this is exactly
what the cryptlib enveloping functions do). It also means you can change the
password on the file by changing the exported key blob, without needing to decrypt
and re-encrypt the entire file.
Importing a Key
Now that you’ve exported the conventional encryption or MAC key, the other party
needs to import it. This is done using the cryptImportKey function and the private
key corresponding to the public key used by the sender:
CRYPT_CONTEXT privKeyContext, cryptContext;
Note the use of CRYPT_ALGO_AES when creating the context for the imported key,
this assumes that both sides have agreed in advance on the use of a common
encryption algorithm to use (in this case AES). If the algorithm information isn’t
available, you’ll have to negotiate the details in some other way. This is normally
done for you by cryptlib’s enveloping code but isn’t available when operating at this
lower level.
To summarise, sharing an encryption context between two parties using public-key
encryption involves the following steps:
/* Party A creates the required encryption context and generates a key
into it */
cryptCreateContext( &cryptContext, cryptUser /* CRYPT_UNUSED */,
CRYPT_ALGO_AES );
cryptGenerateKey( cryptContext );
If the public key is stored in an encryption context with a certificate associated with it
or in a key certificate, there may be constraints on the key usage that are imposed by
the certificate. If the key can’t be used for the import operation, the function will
return CRYPT_ERROR_PERMISSION to indicate that the key isn’t valid for this
operation. You can find out more about the exact nature of the problem by reading
the error-related attributes as explained in “Extended Error Reporting” on page 297.
Importing using Conventional Encryption
If the key has been exported using conventional encryption, you can again use
conventional encryption to import it. Using the same key derived from the
Querying an Exported Key Object 205
passphrase “This is a secret key” that was used in the key export example you would
use:
CRYPT_CONTEXT keyContext, cryptContext;
Since the salt is a random value that changes for each key you derive, you won’t
know it in advance so you’ll have to obtain it by querying the exported key object as
explained below. Once you’ve queried the object, you can use the salt which is
returned with the query information to derive the import key as shown in the above
code.
Any CRYPT_OBJECT_INFO fields that aren’t relevant for this type of object are set
to null or zero as appropriate.
Once you’ve found out what type of object you have, you can use the other
information returned by cryptQueryObject to process the object. For both
conventional and public-key encrypted exported objects you can find out which
encryption algorithm and mode were used to export the key using the cryptAlgo
and cryptMode fields. For conventionally encrypted exported objects you can
obtain the salt needed to derive the import key from the salt and saltSize fields.
206 Exchanging Keys
This is required because PGP’s handling of keys differs somewhat from that used
with other formats.
Key Agreement
The Diffie-Hellman key agreement capability is currently disabled since, unlike RSA
and conventional key exchange, there’s no widely-accepted standard format for it
(SSL/TLS and SSHv2 are handled internally by cryptlib and CMS is never used by
anything). If a widely-accepted standard emerges, cryptlib will use that format.
Previous versions of cryptlib used a combination of PKCS #3, PKCS #5, and PKCS
#7 formats and mechanisms to handle DH key agreement.
cryptlib supports a third kind of key export/import that doesn’t actually export or
import a key but merely provides a means of agreeing on a shared secret key with
another party. You don’t have to explicitly load of generate a session key for this one
since the act of performing the key exchange will create a random, secret shared key.
To use this form of key exchange, both parties call cryptExportKey to generate the
blob to send to the other party, and then both in turn call cryptImportKey to import
the blob sent by the other party.
Key Agreement 207
Note that there’s no need to load a key into the template, since this is generated
automatically as part of the export/import process. In addition the template is
destroyed once the key has been exported, since there’s no further use for it — it
merely acts as a template to tell cryptExportKey what to do.
Both parties now exchange encryptedKey blobs, and then use:
cryptImportKey( encryptedKey, encryptedKeyLength, dhContext,
cryptContext );
Signing Data
Most public-key encryption algorithms can be used to generate digital signatures on
data. A digital signature is created by signing the contents of a hash context with a
private key to create a signature blob, and verified by checking the signature blob
with the corresponding public key.
To do this, you use the cryptCreateSignature and cryptCheckSignature functions
in combination with a public-key encryption context. Let’s say you’ve hashed some
data with an SHA2 hash context hashContext and want to sign it with your
private key in the encryption context sigKeyContext. To do this you’d use:
CRYPT_CONTEXT sigKeyContext, hashContext;
void *signature;
int signatureLength;
to create the signature blob. Note that due to encoding issues for some algorithms the
final exported blob may be one or two bytes smaller than the size which is initially
reported, since the true size can’t be determined until the signature is actually
generated. Alternatively, you can just allocate a reasonably sized block of memory
and use that to hold the signature. “Reasonably sized” means a few Kb, a 4K block is
plenty (a signature blob for a 1024-bit public key is only about 200 bytes long).
If the hash context contains too much data to encode using the given public key (for
example trying to sign a 256- or 512-bit hash value using a 512-bit public key) the
function will return CRYPT_ERROR_OVERFLOW. As a rule of thumb a 1024-bit
private key should be large enough to sign the data in any hash context.
Now that you’ve created the signature, the other party needs to check it. This is done
using the cryptCheckSignature function and the public key or key certificate
corresponding to the private key used to create the signature (you can also pass in a
private key if you want, cryptCheckSignature will only use the public key
components, although it’s not clear why you’d be in possession of someone else’s
private key). To perform the check using a public key context you’d use:
Querying a Signature Object 209
Any CRYPT_OBJECT_INFO fields that aren’t relevant for this type of object are set
to null or zero as appropriate.
Once you’ve found out what type of object you have, you can use the other
information returned by cryptQueryObject to process the object. The information
that you need to obtain from the blob is the hash algorithm that was used to hash the
signed data, which is contained in the hashAlgo field. To hash a piece of data
before checking the signature on it you would use:
CRYPT_CONTEXT hashContext;
If you need more precise control over the extra information, you can specify it
yourself in the form of a CRYPT_CERTTYPE_CMS_ATTRIBUTES certificate
object, which is described in more detail in “CMS/SMIME Attributes” on page 267.
By default cryptlib will include the default signature attributes CRYPT_-
CERTINFO_CMS_SIGNINGTIME and CRYPT_CERTINFO_CMS_-
CONTENTTYPE for you if you don’t specify it yourself, and for S/MIME signatures
Extended Signature Creation/Checking 211
In general if you’re sending signed data to a recipient who is also using cryptlib-
based software, you should use the default cryptlib signature format which is more
flexible in terms of key handling and far more space-efficient (CMS/SMIME
signatures are typically ten times the size of the default cryptlib format while
providing little extra information, and have a much higher processing overhead than
cryptlib signatures).
As with encrypted key export, PGP handles signing somewhat differently to any other
format. In particular, when you hash the data you can’t complete the processing by
hashing a zero-length value as with normal signatures, since PGP needs to hash in
assorted other data before it writes the signature. The same holds for signature
verification.
Extended signature checking follows the same pattern as extended signature
generation, with the extra parameter to the function being a pointer to the location
that receives the additional information included with the signature. With the
CRYPT_FORMAT_CRYPTLIB format type, there’s no extra information present
and the parameter should be set to null. With CRYPT_FORMAT_CMS/
CRYPT_FORMAT_SMIME, you can also set the parameter to null if you’re not
interested in the additional information, and cryptlib will discard it after using it as
part of the signature checking process. If you are interested in the additional
information, you should set the parameter to a pointer to a CRYPT_CERTIFICATE
object that cryptlib will create for you and populate with the additional signature
information. If the signature check succeeds, you can work with the resulting
information as described in “Other Certificate Object Extensions” on page 267:
CRYPT_CERTIFICATE signatureAttributes;
int status;
/* Clean up */
cryptDestroyCert( signatureAttributes );
}
212 Certificates in Detail
Certificates in Detail
Although a public/private key context can be used to store basic key components, it’s
not capable of storing any additional information such as the key owner’s name,
usage restrictions, and key validity information. This type of information is stored in
a key certificate, which is encoded according to the X.509 standard and sundry
amendments, corrections, extensions, profiles, and related standards. A certificate
consists of the encoded public key, information to identify the owner of the
certificate, other data such as usage and validity information, and a digital signature
that binds all this information to the key.
There are a number of different types of certificate objects, including actual
certificates, certification requests, certificate revocation lists (CRLs), certification
authority (CA) certificates, certificate chains, attribute certificates, and others. For
simplicity the following text refers to all of these items using the general term
“certificate”. Only where a specific type of item such as a CA certificate or a
certification request is required will the actual name be used.
cryptlib stores all of these items in a generic CRYPT_CERTIFICATE container
object into which you can insert various items such as identification information and
key attributes, as well as public-key encryption contexts or other certificate objects.
Once everything has been added, you can fix the state of the certificate by signing it,
after which you can’t change it except by starting again with a fresh certificate object.
Working with certificates at the level described in this and the following chapters is
extraordinarily difficult and painful. Before you decide to work with certificates at
this level, you should read “High-level vs. Low-level Certificate Operations” on page
154 to make absolutely certain you don’t want to use cryptlib’s high-level certificate
management capabilities instead.
Overview of Certificates
Public key certificates are objects that bind information about the owner of a public
key to the key itself. The binding is achieved by having the information in the
certificate signed by a certification authority (CA) that protects the integrity of the
certificate information and allows it to be distributed over untrusted channels and
stored on untrusted systems.
You can request a certificate from a CA with a certification request, which encodes a
public key and identification information and binds them together for processing by
the CA. The CA responds to a certificate request with a signed certificate.
In addition to creating certificates, you may occasionally need to revoke them.
Revoked keys are handled via certificate revocation lists (CRLs), which work like
1970’s-vintage credit card blacklists by providing users with a list of certificates that
shouldn’t be honoured any more. In practice the blacklist approach was never
practical (it was for this reason that it was abandoned by credit card vendors twenty
years ago), has little support in actual implementations, and is typically handled by
going through the motions of a CRL check for form’s sake without really taking it
seriously. Revocations can only be issued by a CA, so to revoke a certificate you
either have to be a CA or have the co-operation of a CA. This chapter covers the
details of creating and issuing CRLs.
Certificates and Standards Compliance
The key certificates used by most software today were originally specified in the
CCITT (now ITU) X.509 standard, and have been extended via assorted ISO, ANSI,
ITU, IETF, and national standards (generally referred to as “X.509 profiles”), along
with sundry amendments, meeting notes, draft standards, committee drafts, working
drafts, and other work-in-progress documents. X.509 version 1 (X.509v1) defined
the original, very basic certificate format, the latest version of the standard is version
3 (X.509v3), which defines all manner of extensions and additions and is still in the
process of being finalised and profiled (there are multiple, perpetually-ongoing
Overview of Certificates 213
editions of X.509v3, so that a full reference becomes something like “X.509 version
3, 5th edition”). Compliance with the various certificate standards varies greatly.
Most implementations manage to get the decade-old X.509v1 more or less correct,
and cryptlib includes special code to allow it to process many incorrectly-formatted
X.509v1-style certificates as well as all correctly formatted ones. However
compliance with X.509v3 and related profiles and updates is extremely patchy.
Because of this, it is strongly recommended that you test the certificates you plan to
produce with cryptlib against any other software you want to interoperate with.
Although cryptlib produces certificates that comply fully with X.509 version 3 and
up, and related standards and recommendations, many other programs (including
several common web browsers and servers) either can’t process these certificates or
will process them incorrectly. Note that even if the other software loads your
certificate, it frequently won’t process the information contained in it correctly, so
you should verify that it’s handling it in the way you expect it to.
If you need to interoperate with a variety of other programs, you may need to find the
lowest common denominator that all programs can accept, which is usually X.509v1,
sometimes with one or two basic X.509v3 extensions. Alternatively, you can issue
different certificates for different software, a technique which is currently used by
some CAs that have a different certificate issuing process for Netscape, MSIE, and
everything else.
Much current certificate management software produces an amazing collection of
garbled, invalid, and just plain broken certificates that will be rejected by cryptlib as
not complying with the relevant security standards. To bypass this problem, it’s
possible to disable various portions of the certificate checking code in order to allow
these certificates to be processed. If a certificate fails to load you can try disabling
more and more certificate checking in cryptlib until the certificate can be loaded,
although disabling these checks will also void any guarantees about correct certificate
handling.
Finally, implementations are free to stuff anything they feel like into certain areas of
the certificate. cryptlib goes to some lengths to take this into account and process the
certificate no matter what data it finds in there, however sometimes it may find
something that it can’t handle. If you require support for special certificate
components (either to generate them or to process them), please contact the cryptlib
developers.
Certificate Compliance Level Checking
In order to allow cryptlib to process broken certificates, you can vary the level of
standards compliance checking that it performs on certificates. The level of checking
is controlled by the CRYPT_OPTION_CERT_COMPLIANCELEVEL configuration
option, with configuration options being explained in more detail in “Working with
Configuration Options” on page 287. This option can be set to one of the following
values:
Compliance Level Description
CRYPT_- Full compliance with X.509 and PKIX
COMPLIANCELEVEL_ standards. This checks and enforces all PKIX
PKIX_FULL extensions and requirements (note the warning
further down about what this entails). This level
of checking will reject a significant number of
certificates/certificate chains in use today.
214 Certificates in Detail
cryptDestroyCert( cryptCertificate );
User CA
Generate Convert certificate
certificate request request to certificate
These steps can be broken down into a number of individual operations. The first
step, generating a certification request, involves the following:
generate public/private key pair;
create certificate object;
add public key to certificate object;
add identification information to certificate object;
sign certificate object with private key;
export certification request for transmission to CA;
destroy certificate object;
The CA receives the certification request and turns it into a certificate as follows:
import certification request;
check validity and signature on certification request;
create certificate object;
add certification request to certificate object;
add any extra information (e.g. key usage constraints) to certificate
object;
sign certificate object;
export certificate for transmission to user;
destroy certificate objects;
Finally, the user receives the signed certificate from the CA and processes it as
required, typically writing it to a public key keyset or updating a private key keyset:
import certificate;
check validity and signature on certificate;
write certificate to keyset;
destroy certificate object;
The details on performing these operations are covered in the following sections.
Certificate Structures
Certificates, attribute certificates, certification requests, and CRLs have their own,
often complex, structures that are encoded and decoded for you by cryptlib.
Although cryptlib provides the ability to control the details of each certificate object
in great detail if you require this, in practice you should leave the certificate
management to cryptlib. If you don’t fill in the non-mandatory fields, cryptlib will fill
them in for you with default values when you sign the certificate object.
Certificate chains are composite objects that contain within them one or more
complete certificates. These are covered in more detail in “Certificate Chains” on
page 235.
Attribute Certificate Structure
An X.509 attribute certificate has the following structure:
Field Description
Version The version number defines the attribute certificate
version and is filled in automatically by cryptlib when
the certificate is signed.
HolderName The holder name identifies the holder of the attribute
certificate and is explained in more detail further on. If
you add a certificate request using CRYPT_-
Certificate Structures 217
Field Description
CERTINFO_CERTREQUEST or a certificate using
CRYPT_CERTINFO_CERTIFICATE, this field will
be filled in for you.
This is a composite field that you must fill in yourself
unless it has already been filled in from a certification
request or certificate.
IssuerName The issuer name identifies the attribute certificate
signer (usually an authority, the attribute-certificate
version of a CA), and is filled in automatically by
cryptlib when the certificate is signed.
SignatureAlgorithm The signature algorithm identifies the algorithm used to
sign the attribute certificate, and is filled in
automatically by cryptlib when the certificate is signed.
SerialNumber The serial number is unique for each attribute
certificate issued by an authority, and is filled in
automatically by cryptlib when the certificate is signed.
You can obtain the value of this field with
CRYPT_CERTINFO_SERIALNUMBER, but you
can’t set it. If you try to set it, cryptlib will return
CRYPT_ERROR_PERMISSION to indicate that you
don’t have permission to set this field. The serial
number is returned as a binary string and not as a
numeric value, since it is often 15-20 bytes long.
cryptlib doesn’t use strict sequential numbering for the
certificates it issues since this would make it very easy
for a third party to determine how many certificates a
CA is issuing at any time.
Validity The validity period defines the period of time over
which an attribute certificate is valid. CRYPT_-
CERTINFO_VALIDFROM specifies the validity start
period, and CRYPT_CERTINFO_VALIDTO specifies
the validity end period. If you don’t set these, cryptlib
will set them for you when the attribute certificate is
signed so that the certificate validity starts on the day of
issue and ends one year later. You can change the
default validity period using the cryptlib configuration
option CRYPT_OPTION_CERT_VALIDITY as
explained in “Working with Configuration Options” on
page 287.
cryptlib enforces validity period nesting when
generating an attribute certificate, so that the validity
period of an attribute certificate will be constrained to
lie within the validity period of the authority certificate
that signed it. If this isn’t done, some software will
treat the certificate as being invalid, or will regard it as
having expired once the authority certificate that signed
it expires.
Due to the vagaries of international time zones and
daylight savings time adjustments, it isn’t possible to
accurately compare two local times from different time
zones, or made across a DST switch (consider for
example a country switching to DST, which has two
2am times while another country only has one).
Because of this ambiguity, times read from objects
218 Certificates in Detail
Field Description
such as certificates may be out by an hour or two.
Attributes The attributes field contains a collection of attributes
for the certificate owner. Since no standard attributes
had been defined at the time of the last X.509 attribute
certificate committee draft, cryptlib doesn’t currently
support attributes in this field. When attributes are
defined, cryptlib will support them.
IssuerUniqueID The issuer unique ID was added in X.509v2, but its use
has been discontinued. If this string field is present in
existing attribute certificates you can obtain its value
using CRYPT_CERTINFO_ISSUERUNIQUEID, but
you can’t set it. If you try to set it, cryptlib will return
CRYPT_ERROR_PERMISSION to indicate that you
have no permission to set this field.
Extensions Certificate extensions allow almost anything to be
added to an attribute certificate and are covered in more
detail in “Certificate Extensions” on page 244.
Certificate Structure
An X.509 certificate has the following structure:
Field Description
Version The version number defines the certificate version and
is filled in automatically by cryptlib when the
certificate is signed. It is used mainly for marketing
purposes to claim that software is X.509v3 compliant
(even when it isn’t).
SerialNumber The serial number is unique for each certificate issued
by a CA, and is filled in automatically by cryptlib when
the certificate is signed. You can obtain the value of
this field with CRYPT_CERTINFO_-
SERIALNUMBER, but you can’t set it. If you try to
set it, cryptlib will return CRYPT_ERROR_-
PERMISSION to indicate that you don’t have
permission to set this field. The serial number is
returned as a binary string and not as a numeric value,
since it is often 15-20 bytes long.
cryptlib doesn’t use strict sequential numbering for the
certificates it issues since this would make it very easy
for a third party to determine how many certificates a
CA is issuing at any time.
SignatureAlgorithm The signature algorithm identifies the algorithm used to
sign the certificate, and is filled in automatically by
cryptlib when the certificate is signed.
IssuerName The issuer name identifies the certificate signer
(usually a CA), and is filled in automatically by
cryptlib when the certificate is signed.
Validity The validity period defines the period of time over
which a certificate is valid. CRYPT_CERTINFO_-
VALIDFROM specifies the validity start period, and
CRYPT_CERTINFO_VALIDTO specifies the validity
end period. If you don’t set these, cryptlib will set
them for you when the certificate is signed so that the
certificate validity starts on the day of issue and ends
Certificate Structures 219
Field Description
one year later. You can change the default validity
period using the cryptlib configuration option
CRYPT_OPTION_CERT_VALIDITY as explained in
“Working with Configuration Options” on page 287.
cryptlib enforces validity period nesting when
generating a certificate, so that the validity period of a
certificate will be constrained to lie within the validity
period of the CA certificate that signed it. If this isn’t
done, some software will treat the certificate as being
invalid, or will regard it as having expired once the CA
certificate that signed it expires.
Due to the vagaries of international time zones and
daylight savings time adjustments, it isn’t possible to
accurately compare two local times from different time
zones, or made across a DST switch (consider for
example a country switching to DST, which has two
2am times while another country only has one).
Because of this ambiguity, times read from objects
such as certificates may be out by an hour or two.
SubjectName The subject name identifies the owner of the certificate
and is explained in more detail further on. If you add
the subject public key info from a certification request
using CRYPT_CERTINFO_CERTREQUEST, this
field will be filled in for you.
This is a composite field that you must fill in yourself
unless it has already been filled in from a certification
request.
SubjectPublicKey- The subject public key info contains the public key for
Info this certificate. You can specify the public key with
CRYPT_CERTINFO_SUBJECTPUBLICKEYINFO,
and provide either an encryption context or a certificate
object that contains a public key. You can also add a
certification request with CRYPT_CERTINFO_-
CERTREQUEST, which fills in the subject public key
info, subject name, and possibly some certificate
extensions.
This is a numeric field that you must fill in yourself.
IssuerUniqueID The issuer and subject unique ID were added in
SubjectUniqueID X.509v2, but their use has been discontinued. If these
string fields are present in existing certificates you can
obtain their values using CRYPT_CERTINFO_-
ISSUERUNIQUEID and CRYPT_CERTINFO_-
SUBJECTUNIQUEID, but you can’t set them. If you
try to set them, cryptlib will return CRYPT_ERROR_-
PERMISSION to indicate that you have no permission
to set these fields.
Extensions Certificate extensions were added in X.509v3.
Extensions allow almost anything to be added to a
certificate and are covered in more detail in “Certificate
Extensions” on page 244.
Field Description
Version The version number defines the certification request
version and is filled in automatically by cryptlib when
the request is signed.
SubjectName The subject name identifies the owner of the
certification request and is explained in more detail
further on.
This is a composite field that you must fill in yourself.
SubjectPublicKey- The subject public key info contains the public key for
Info this certification request. You can specify the public
key with CRYPT_CERTINFO_-
SUBJECTPUBLICKEYINFO, and provide either an
encryption context or a certificate object that contains a
public key.
This is a composite field that you must fill in yourself.
Extensions Extensions allow almost anything to be added to a
certification request and are covered in more detail in
“Certificate Extensions” on page 244.
CRL Structure
An X.509 CRL has the following structure:
Field Description
Version The version number defines the CRL version and is
filled in automatically by cryptlib when the CRL is
signed.
SignatureAlgorithm The signature algorithm identifies the algorithm used to
sign the CRL, and is filled in automatically by cryptlib
when the CRL is signed.
IssuerName The issuer name identifies the CRL signer, and is filled
in automatically by cryptlib when the CRL is signed.
ThisUpdate The update time specifies when the CRL was issued,
NextUpdate and the next update time specifies when the next CRL
will be issued. CRYPT_CERTINFO_THISUPDATE
specifies the current CRL issue time, and
CRYPT_CERTINFO_NEXTUPDATE specifies the
next CRL issue time. If you don’t set these, cryptlib
will set them for you when the CRL is signed so that
the issue time is the day of issue and the next update
time is 90 days later. You can change the default
update interval using the cryptlib configuration option
CRYPT_OPTION_CERT_UPDATEINTERVAL as
explained in “Working with Configuration Options” on
page 287.
Due to the vagaries of international time zones and
daylight savings time adjustments, it isn’t possible to
accurately compare two local times from different time
zones, or made across a DST switch (consider for
example a country switching to DST, which has two
2am times while another country only has one).
Because of this ambiguity, times read from objects
such as certificates may be out by an hour or two.
UserCertificate The user certificate identifies the certificates that are
being revoked in this CRL. The certificates must be
Basic Certificate Management 221
Field Description
ones that were issued using the CA certificate which is
being used to issue the CRL. If you try to revoke a
certificate that was issued using a different CA
certificate, cryptlib will return a CRYPT_ERROR_-
INVALID error when you add the certificate or sign
the CRL to indicate that the certificate can’t be revoked
using this CRL. You can specify the certificates to be
revoked with CRYPT_CERTINFO_CERTIFICATE.
This is a numeric field, and the only one that you must
fill in yourself.
RevocationDate The revocation date identifies the date on which a
certificate was revoked. You can specify the
revocation date with CRYPT_CERTINFO_-
REVOCATIONDATE. If you don’t set it, cryptlib will
set it for you to the date on which the CRL was signed.
The revocation date you specify applies to the last
certificate added to the list of revoked certificates. If
no certificates have been added yet, it will be used as a
default date that applies to all certificates for which no
revocation date is explicitly set.
Due to the vagaries of international time zones and
daylight savings time adjustments, it isn’t possible to
accurately compare two local times from different time
zones, or made across a DST switch (consider for
example a country switching to DST, which has two
2am times while another country only has one).
Because of this ambiguity, times read from objects
such as certificates may be out by an hour or two.
Certificate Attributes
Certificate objects contain a number of basic attributes and an optional collection of
often complex data structures and components. cryptlib provides a variety of
mechanisms for working with them. The attributes in a certificate object can be
broken up into three basic types:
1. Basic certificate attributes such as the public key and timestamp/validity
information.
2. Identification information such as the certificate subject and issuer name.
3. Certificate extensions that can contain almost anything. These are covered in
“Certificate Extensions” on page 244.
Although cryptlib provides the ability to manipulate all of these attributes, in practice
you only need to handle a small subset of them yourself. The rest will be set to
sensible defaults by cryptlib.
Apart from this, certificate attributes are handled in the standard way described in
“Working with Object Attributes” on page 39.
CRYPT_CERTIFICATE cryptCertRequest;
void *certRequest;
int certRequestMaxLength, certRequestLength;
/* Sign the certification request with the private key and export
it */
cryptSignCert( cryptCertRequest, privKeyContext );
cryptExportCert( NULL, 0, &certRequestMaxLength,
CRYPT_CERTFORMAT_CERTIFICATE, cryptCertRequest );
certRequest = malloc( certRequestMaxLength );
cryptExportCert( certRequest, certRequestMaxLength,
&certRequestLength, CRYPT_CERTFORMAT_CERTIFICATE,
cryptCertRequest );
This simply takes a public key, adds some identification information to it (the details
of this will be covered later), signs it, and exports the encoded certification request
for transmission to a CA. Since cryptlib will only copy across the appropriate key
components, there’s no need to have a separate public and private key context, you
can add the same private key context that you’ll be using to sign the certification
request to supply the CRYPT_CERTINFO_SUBJECTPUBLICKEYINFO
information and cryptlib will use the appropriate data from it.
To process the certification request and convert it into a certificate, the CA does the
following:
CRYPT_CERTIFICATE cryptCertificate, cryptCertRequest;
void *cert;
int certMaxLength, certLength;
/* Sign the certificate with the CA’s private key and export it */
cryptSignCert( cryptCertificate, caPrivateKey );
cryptExportCert( NULL, 0, &certMaxLength,
CRYPT_CERTFORMAT_CERTIFICATE, cryptCertificate );
cert = malloc( certMaxLength );
cryptExportCert( cert, certMaxLength, &certLength,
CRYPT_CERTFORMAT_CERTIFICATE, cryptCertificate );
In this case the CA has put together a minimal certificate that can be processed by
most software but which is rather limited in the amount of control that the CA and
end user has over the certificate, since no specific control information has been added
to the certificate. By default cryptlib adds the necessary fields for a full X.509v3 and
newer certificate, but this won’t contain all the information that would be available if
the CA explicitly handles the fields for the certificate itself. Creating full X.509v3
certificates involves the use of certificate extensions and is covered in more detail
later.
Certificate Identification Information 223
To check the signed certificate returned from the CA and add it to a keyset, the user
does the following:
CRYPT_CERTIFICATE cryptCertificate;
To obtain information about the key contained in a certificate you can read the
appropriate attributes just like an encryption context, for example
CRYPT_CTXINFO_ALGO will return the encryption/signature algorithm type,
CRYPT_CTXINFO_NAME_ALGO will return the algorithm name, and
CRYPT_CTXINFO_KEYSIZE will return the key size.
Component Description
specify the locality with CRYPT_CERTINFO_-
LOCALITYNAME.
CommonName (CN) The name of the certificate owner, which can be
either a person such as ‘John Doe’, a business role
such as ‘Accounts Manager’, or even an entity like
‘Laser Printer #6’. You can specify the common
name with CRYPT_CERTINFO_-
COMMONNAME.
This is a field that you must fill in.
All DN components except the country name are limited to a maximum of 64
characters (this is a requirement of the X.500 standard that defines the certificate
format and use). cryptlib provides the CRYPT_MAX_TEXTSIZE constant for this
limit. Note that this defines the number of characters and not the number of bytes, so
that a Unicode string could be several times as long in bytes as it would be in
characters, depending on which data type the system uses to represent Unicode
characters.
The complete DN can be used for a personal key used for private purposes (for
example to perform home banking or send private email) or for a key used for
business purposes (for example to sign business agreements). The difference
between the two key types is that a personal key will identify someone as a private
individual, whereas a business key will identify someone terms of the organisation for
which they work.
A DN must always contain a country name and a common name, and should
generally also contain one or more of the other components. If a DN doesn’t contain
at least the two minimum components, cryptlib will return CRYPT_ERROR_-
NOTINITED with an extended error indicating the missing component when you try
to sign the certificate object.
Realising that DNs are too complex and specialised to handle many types of current
certificate usage, more recent revisions of the X.509 standard were extended to
include a more generalised name format called a GeneralName, which is explained in
more detail in “Extended Certificate Identification Information” on page 228.
DN Structure for Business Use
For business use, the DN should include the country code, the organisation name, an
optional organisational unit name, and the common name. An example of a DN
structured for business use would be:
C = US
O = Cognitive Cybernetics Incorporated
OU = Research and Development
CN = Paul Johnson
This is a key which is used by an individual within an organisation. It might also
describe a role within the organisation, in this case a class of certificate issuer in a
CA:
C = DE
O = Kommunikationsnetz Franken e.V. Certification Authority
CN = Class 1 CA
It might even describe an entity with no direct organisational role:
C = AT
O = Erste Allgemeine Verunsicherung
CN = Mail Gateway
In this last case the certificate might be used by the mail gateway machine to
authenticate data transmitted through it.
Certificate Identification Information 225
The same process applies for adding other types of identification information to a
certification request or certificates. Note that cryptlib sorts the DN components into
the correct order when it creates the certification request or certificate, so there’s no
need to specify them in strict order as in the above code.
By default, cryptlib will work with the subject name, if you want to access the issuer
name you need to select it first so that DN components can be read from it instead of
the subject name (issuer names are only present in some certificate object types, for
example the certification request above doesn’t contain an issuer name). To tell
cryptlib to use the issuer name, you set the currently active certificate attribute to the
issuer name:
cryptSetAttribute( certificate, CRYPT_ATTRIBUTE_CURRENT,
CRYPT_CERTINFO_ISSUERNAME );
Once you’ve selected a different DN in this manner, it remains selected until you
select a different one, so if you wanted to move back to working with the subject
name you’d need to use:
cryptSetAttribute( certificate, CRYPT_ATTRIBUTE_CURRENT,
CRYPT_CERTINFO_SUBJECTNAME );
otherwise attempts to query further DN attributes will apply to the selected issuer
name attribute instead of the subject name.
Creating Customised DNs
Although the DN-handling mechanisms provided by cryptlib are extremely flexible,
they enforce a few restrictions on the format of the DN to ensure that the resulting
value can be processed properly by other applications. Sometimes it may be
necessary to create customised, non-standard DNs for certain applications that require
an unusual DN structure or the use of odd DN components. cryptlib allows the
creation of arbitrary DNs by specifying them as a string representation of the
complete DN, identified by CRYPT_CERTINFO_DN. The following section is
intended for advanced users and assumes some knowledge of X.500 terminology.
Complete DNs are specified using the LDAP-style string representation of the DN
that contains one or more “label = value” pairs specifying a DN component and its
value, for example the DN:
C = US
O = Cognitive Cybernetics Incorporated
OU = Research and Development
CN = Paul Johnson
that was used earlier would be represented in string form as “cn=Paul Johnson,
ou=Research and Development, o=Cognitive Cybernetics Incorporated, c=US”, with
each RDN being separated by a comma. Note that the encoding of the RDNs in the
string is backwards, this is a requirement of the LDAP DN string format. To set the
DN for the previous certificate request in one step using a DN string you would use:
CRYPT_CERTIFICATE cryptCertRequest;
This sets the entire DN at once rather than setting it component by component. Once
you’ve set the DN in this manner you can’t modify or delete any components because
cryptlib preserves the exact ordering and format of the DN components, an ordering
that would be destroyed with some of the more complex DNs that will be presented
Certificate Identification Information 227
further down. You can also obtain the complete DN in string form by reading the
value of this attribute.
The string DN form contains a number of special-case characters that are used to
break up the RDNs and AVAs, if you want to use these in a DN component you need
to escape them with ‘\’ so that for example ‘cn=a = b’ would be specified as ‘cn=a \=
b’. cryptlib will automatically add these escape sequences to the DN components if
required when you read the attribute value.
Note that since the DN in this form has to be representable as a text string, it can’t
contain any non-ASCII values. If you try to read the DN as a
CRYPT_CERTINFO_DN and it contains non-ASCII values, cryptlib will return
CRYPT_ERROR_NOTAVAIL to indicate that the DN can’t be represented as a
CRYPT_CERTINFO_DN, and you’ll have to read the individual components as a
CRYPT_CERTINFO_COUNTRYNAME, CRYPT_CERTINFO_-
STATEORPROVINCENAME, and so on. The same applies to setting a
CRYPT_CERTINFO_DN, the value has to be encoded as a plain text string.
The example shown above will result in the creation of a DN which is no different to
one created in the usual manner, however since the DN string can contain arbitrary
numbers of RDNs in arbitrary order, it’s possible to create DNs that wouldn’t be
possible in the usual manner. For example to add a second OU “AI Lab” to the DN
given above you would specify the DN as “cn=Paul Johnson, ou=Research and
Development, ou=AI Lab, o=Cognitive Cybernetics Incorporated, c=US”. Note
again the backwards encoding, which means that “AI Lab” occurs higher up in the
hierarchy than “Research and Development” even though it comes after it in the DN
string.
It’s also possible to group multiple AVAs into an RDN by connecting them with a ‘+’
instead of the usual comma, for example to add Paul Johnson’s serial number to the
above DN you would use “cn=Paul Johnson + sn=12345678, ou=Research and
Development, o=Cognitive Cybernetics Incorporated, c=US”. Once encoded in the
certificate, the final RDN will contain two AVAs, one with the common name and
the other with the serial number.
The labels that are used to identify DN components are:
Label Component
Bc businessCategory
C countryName
cn commonName
D Description
dc domainComponent
email emailAddress (PKCS #9)
G givenName
I Initials
isdn internationalISDNNumber
L Locality
O organisationName
ou organisationalUnitName
S Surname
sn serialNumber
sp stateOrProvinceName
st streetAddress
228 Certificates in Detail
Label Component
T Title
There exist many more DN components beyond those shown in the table above, but
labels for them were never defined and it’s necessary to refer to them by object
identifier with the prefix oid. to denote the use of an OID rather than a text label.
The remaining DN components and their OID labels are aliasObjectName,
oid.2.5.4.1, communicationsNetwork oid.2.5.4.67,
communicationsService oid.2.5.4.66, destinationIndicator, oid.2.5.4.27,
distinguishedName, oid.2.5.4.49, dnQualifier, oid.2.5.4.46,
facsimileTelephoneNumber, oid.2.5.4.23, generationQualifier,
oid.2.5.4.44, houseIdentifier, oid.2.5.4.51, knowledgeInformation,
oid.2.5.4.2, member, oid.2.5.4.31, name, oid.2.5.4.41,
nameDistinguisher, oid.0.2.262.1.10.7.20, owner, oid.2.5.4.32,
physicalDeliveryOfficeName, oid.2.5.4.19, postalAddress, oid.2.5.4.16,
postalCode, oid.2.5.4.17, postOfficeBox, oid.2.5.4.18,
preferredDeliveryMethod, oid.2.5.4.28, presentationAddress,
oid.2.5.4.29, pseudonym oid.2.5.4.65, registeredAddress,
oid.2.5.4.26, rfc822Mailbox, oid.0.9.2342.19200300.100.1.3,
roleOccupant, oid.2.5.4.33, searchGuide, oid.2.5.4.14, seeAlso,
oid.2.5.4.34, supportedApplicationContext, oid.2.5.4.30, telephone-
Number, oid.2.5.4.20, telexNumber, oid.2.5.4.21, teletexTerminal-
Identifier, oid.2.5.4.22, uniqueIdentifier, oid.2.5.4.45, uniqueMember,
oid.2.5.4.50, userid, oid.0.9.2342.19200300.100.1.1, and
x121Address, oid.2.5.4.24. If you can figure out what a roleOccupant or
supportedApplicationContext actually are, consider yourself qualified to use them.
Note that a number of different and often incompatible naming schemes for X.500
attributes exist. X.500 only defined a handful of names, and as a result many other
standards and implementations invented their own, a number of which conflict with
each other, and several of which conflict with the original X.500 names. cryptlib uses
the names that are most widely used with certificates. Since many of the names used
by different standards conflict, it’s not possible to have cryptlib handle multiple
aliases for the same attribute, however if you require custom names to conform to a
particular standard or interpretation of a standard, you can change the values in the
code to reflect whatever names you want.
The CRYPT_CERTINFO_DN provides a powerful means of creating completely
custom DNs, note though that this can result in DNs that can’t be correctly processed
or displayed by many applications, so you should only create non-standard DNs in
this manner where it’s absolutely necessary. In particular you need to take care that
DN components like the CommonName and email address are in a form that cryptlib
can work with, otherwise functions like cryptGetPublicKey that use DN components
for lookups make not be able to locate the certificate.
CRYPT_CERTIFICATE cryptCertRequest;
Although GeneralNames are commonly used to identify a certificates owner just like
a DN, they are in fact a certificate extension rather than a basic attribute. Each
certificate can contain multiple extensions that contain GeneralNames. The various
extensions that can contain GeneralNames are covered in “Certificate Extensions” on
page 244, and the details of working with them are explained in “Composite
Extension Attributes” on page 245.
Certificate Fingerprints
Certificates are sometimes identified through “fingerprints” that constitute either an
SHA-1 or SHA-2 hash of the certificate data. You can obtain a certificate’s
fingerprint by reading its CRYPT_CERTINFO_FINGERPRINT_SHA1 or
CRYPT_CERTINFO_FINGERPRINT_SHA2 attributes:
unsigned char fingerprint[ CRYPT_MAX_HASHSIZE ]
int fingerprintSize;
Importing/Exporting Certificates
If you have an encoded certificate that was obtained elsewhere, you can import it into
a certificate object using cryptImportCert. There are more than a dozen mostly
incompatible formats for communicating certificates, of which cryptlib will handle all
the generally useful and known ones. This includes straight binary certification
requests, certificates, attribute certificates, and CRLs (usually stored with a .der file
extension when they are saved to disk), PKCS #7 certificate chains, and Netscape
certificate sequences. Certificates can also be protected with base64 armouring and
BEGIN/END CERTIFICATE delimiters, which is the format used by some web
browsers and other applications. When transferred via HTTP using the Netscape-
specific format, certificates, certificate chains, and Netscape certificate sequences are
identified with have the MIME content types application/x-x509-user-
cert, application/x-x509-ca-cert, and application/x-x509-
email-cert, depending on the certificate type (cryptlib doesn’t use the MIME
content type since the certificate itself provides a far more reliable indication of its
intended use than the easily-altered MIME content type).. Finally, certification
requests and certificate chains can be encoded with the MIME / S/MIME content
types application/pkcs-signed-data, application/x-pkcs-
signed-data, application/pkcs-certs-only, application/x-
pkcs-certs-only, application/pkcs10, or application/x-pkcs10.
These are usually stored with a .p7c extension (for pure certificate chains), a .p7s
extension (for signatures containing a certificate chain), or a .p10 extension (for
certification requests) when they are saved to disk.
cryptlib will import any of the previously described certificate formats if they are
encoded in this manner. To import a certificate object you would use:
Importing/Exporting Certificates 231
CRYPT_CERTIFICATE cryptCertificate;
cryptlib will export certificates in any of the formats in which it can import them.
The available certFormat types are:
Format Type Description
CRYPT_CERTFORMAT_- A certificate encoded as a PKCS #7
CERTCHAIN certificate chain.
CRYPT_CERTFORMAT_- A certification request, certificate, or CRL in
CERTIFICATE binary data format. The certificate object is
encoded according to the ASN.1
distinguished encoding rules. This is the
normal certificate encoding format.
CRYPT_CERTFORMAT_- As CRYPT_CERTFORMAT_CERTCHAIN
TEXT_CERTCHAIN but with base64 armouring of the binary
data.
CRYPT_CERTFORMAT_- As CRYPT_CERTFORMAT_-
TEXT_CERTIFICATE CERTIFICATE but with base64 armouring
of the binary data.
232 Certificates in Detail
If the object that you’re exporting is a complete certificate chain rather than an
individual certificate then these options work somewhat differently. The details of
exporting certificate chains are covered in “Exporting Certificate Chains” on page
237.
The resulting encoded certificate is placed in the memory buffer pointed to by
certificate of maximum size certificateMaxLength, and the actual
length is stored in certLength. This leads to a small problem: How do you know
how big to make the buffer? The answer is to use cryptExportCert to tell you. If
you pass in a null pointer for certificate, the function will set certLength to
the size of the resulting encoded certificate, but not do anything else. You can then
use code like:
cryptExportCert( NULL, 0, &certMaxLength, certFormatType,
cryptCertificate );
certificate = malloc( certMaxLength );
cryptExportCert( certificate, certMaxLength, &certLength,
certFormatType, cryptCertificate );
Alternatively, you can just reserve a reasonably sized block of memory and use that
to hold the encoded certificate. “Reasonably sized” means a few Kb, a 4K block is
plenty (a certificate for a 1024-bit key without certificate extensions is typically about
700 bytes long if encoded using any of the binary formats, or 900 bytes long if
encoded using any of the text formats).
If the certificate is one that you’ve created yourself rather than importing it from an
external source, you need to add various data items to the certificate and then sign it
before you can export it. If you try to export an incompletely prepared certificate
such as a certificate in which some required fields haven’t been filled in or one that
hasn’t been signed, cryptExportCert will return the error CRYPT_ERROR_-
NOTINITED to tell you that the certificate information hasn’t been completely set
up.
Signing/Verifying Certificates
Once a certificate object contains all the information you want to add to it, you need
to sign it in order to transform it into its final state in which the data in it can be
written to a keyset (if the object’s final state is a key certificate or CA certificate) or
exported from the object. Before you sign the certificate, the information within it
exists only in a very generic and indeterminate state. After signing it, the information
is turned into a fixed certificate, CA certificate, certification request, or CRL, and no
further changes can be made to it.
You can sign the information in a certificate object with cryptSignCert:
CRYPT_CONTEXT privKeyContext;
There are some restrictions on the types of keys that can be used to sign certificate
objects. These restrictions are imposed by the way in which certificates and
certificate-related items are encoded, and are as follows:
Signing/Verifying Certificates 233
int isImmutable;
If the result is set to true (a nonzero value), the certificate item can no longer be
changed.
If you’re creating a self-signed certificate signed by a raw private key with no
certificate information associated with it, you need to set the CRYPT_CERTINFO_-
SELFSIGNED attribute before you sign it otherwise cryptlib will flag the attempt to
sign using a non-certificate key as an error. Non-certificate private keys can only be
used to create self-signed certificates (if CRYPT_CERTINFO_SELFSIGNED is set)
or certification requests.
If the object being signed contains unrecognised extensions, cryptlib will not include
them in the signed object (signing extensions of unknown significance is a risky
practice for a CA, which in some jurisdictions can be held liable for any arising
problems). If you want to be able to sign unrecognised extensions, you can enable
this with the cryptlib configuration option CRYPT_OPTION_CERT_-
SIGNUNRECOGNISEDATTRIBUTES as explained in “Working with
Configuration Options” on page 287.
You can verify the signature on a certificate object using cryptCheckCert and the
public key or certificate corresponding to the private key that was used to sign the
certificate (you can also pass in a private key if you want, cryptCheckCert will only
use the public key components, although you shouldn’t really be in possession of
someone else’s private key). To perform the check using a public key context you’d
use:
CRYPT_CONTEXT pubKeyContext;
A signature check using a certificate is similar, except that it uses a certificate object
rather than a public key context.
If the certificate object is self-signed, you can pass in CRYPT_UNUSED as the
second parameter and cryptCheckCert will use the key contained in the certificate
object to check its validity. You can determine whether a certificate object is self-
signed by reading its CRYPT_CERTINFO_SELFSIGNED attribute. Certification
requests are always self-signed, and certificate chains count as self-signed if they
contain a self-signed top-level certificate that can be used to recursively check the rest
of the chain. If the certificate object is a CA certificate which is signing itself (in
other words if it’s a self-signed certificate), you can also pass the certificate as the
second parameter in place of CRYPT_UNUSED, this has the same effect since the
certificate is both the signed and signing object.
If the certificate is invalid (for example because it has expired or because some
certificate usage constraint hasn’t been met), cryptlib will return CRYPT_ERROR_-
INVALID to indicate that the certificate isn’t valid. This value is returned regardless
of whether the signature check succeeds or fails. You can find out the exact nature of
the problem by reading the extended error attributes as explained in “Error Handling”
on page 295.
If the signing/signature check key is stored in an encryption context with a certificate
associated with it or in a certificate, there may be constraints on the key usage that are
imposed by the certificate. If the key can’t be used for the signature or signature
check operation, the function will return CRYPT_ERROR_INVALID to indicate that
the key isn’t valid for this operation. You can find out more about the exact nature of
the problem by reading the extended error attributes as explained in “Error Handling”
on page 295.
If you’re acting as a CA and issuing significant numbers of certificates then a much
easier alternative to signing each certificate yourself using cryptSignCert is to use
Certificate Chains 235
Certificate Chains
Because of the lack of availability of a general-purpose certificate directory, many
security protocols (most notable S/MIME and SSL) transmit not individual
certificates but entire certificate chains that contain a complete certificate path from
the end user’s certificate up to some widely-trusted CA certificate (referred to as a
root CA certificate if it’s a self-signed CA certificate) whose trust will be handled for
you by cryptlib’s trust manager. cryptlib supports the creation, import, export, and
checking of certificate chains as CRYPT_CERTTYPE_CERTCHAIN objects, with
individual certificates in the chain being accessed as if they were standard certificates
contained in a CRYPT_CERTTYPE_CERTIFICATE object.
Working with Certificate Chains
Individual certificates in a chain are addressed through a certificate cursor that
functions in the same way as the attribute cursor discussed in “Attribute Lists and
Attribute Groups” on page 42. Although a certificate chain object appears as a single
object, it consists internally of a collection of certificates of which the first in the
chain is the end user’s certificate and the last is a root CA certificate or at least an
implicitly trusted CA certificate.
You can move the certificate cursor using the CRYPT_CERTINFO_CURRENT_-
CERTIFICATE attribute and the standard cursor movement codes. For example to
move the cursor to the first (end-user) certificate in the chain you would use:
cryptSetAttribute( certificate, CRYPT_CERTINFO_CURRENT_CERTIFICATE,
CRYPT_CURSOR_FIRST );
The certificate cursor and the extension/extension attribute cursor are two completely
independent objects, so moving the certificate cursor from one certificate to another
doesn’t affect the extension cursor setting for each certificate. If you select a
particular extension in a certificate, then move to a different certificate and select an
extension in that, and then move back to the first certificate, the original extension
will still be selected.
Once you’ve selected a particular certificate in the chain, you can work with it as if it
were the only certificate contained in the certificate object. The initially selected
certificate is the end user’s certificate at the start of the chain. For example to read
the commonName from the subject name for the end user’s certificate and for the
next certificate in the chain you would use:
char commonName[ CRYPT_MAX_TEXTSIZE + 1 ];
int commonNameLength;
Apart from this, certificate chains work just like certificates — you can import them,
export them, verify the signatures on them (which verifies the entire chain of
certificates until a trusted certificate is reached), and write them to and read them
from a keyset in exactly the same manner as an individual certificate.
236 Certificates in Detail
/* Read a private key with cert chain from a private key keyset */
/* ... */
In contrast the following code produces a complete certificate chain, since the object
being created is a CRYPT_CERTTYPE_CERTCHAIN (which can hold a complete
chain) rather than a CRYPT_CERTTYPE_CERTIFICATE (which only holds a single
certificate):
CRYPT_CERTIFICATE cryptCertChain;
/* Read a private key with cert chain from a private key keyset */
/* ... */
By specifying the object type to be signed, you can choose between creating a single
signed certificate or a complete certificate chain.
Checking Certificate Chains
When verifying a certificate chain with cryptCheckCert, you don’t have to supply
an issuer certificate since the chain should contain all the issuer certificates up to one
which is trusted by cryptlib:
CRYPT_CERTIFICATE cryptCertChain;
If a certificate in the chain is invalid or the chain doesn’t contain a trusted certificate
at some point in the chain, cryptlib will return an appropriate error code and leave the
Certificate Chains 237
invalid certificate as the currently selected one, allowing you to obtain information
about the nature of the problem by reading the extended error attributes as explained
in “Error Handling” on page 295.
If the error encountered is the fact that the chain doesn’t contain a trusted certificate
somewhere along the line, cryptlib will either mark the top-level certificate as having
a missing CRYPT_CERTINFO_TRUSTED_IMPLICIT attribute if it’s a CA root
certificate (that is, there’s a root certificate present but it isn’t trusted) or mark the
chain as a whole as having a missing certificate if there’s no CA root certificate
present and no trusted certificate present either. Certificate trust management is
explained in more detail in “Certificate Trust Management” on page 241.
Certificate chain validation is an extremely complex process that takes into account
an enormous amount of validation information that may be spread across an entire
certificate chain. For example in a chain of 10 certificates, the 3rd certificate from the
root may place a constraint that doesn’t take effect until the 7th certificate from the
root is reached. Because of this, a reported validation problem isn’t necessary related
to a given certificate and its immediate issuing certificate, but may have been caused
by a different certificate a number of steps further along the chain.
Some certificate chains contain CA certificates that specify certificate policies. By
default cryptlib requires that a policy that’s set by a CA is matched by the certificates
that the CA issues (in other words the CA sets policies for certificates further down
the chain). If you want to allow policies to change going down the chain once the CA
has set them, you can set the CRYPT_OPTION_CERT_REQUIREPOLICY option to
false (0). When it’s set to this value cryptlib won’t verify that policies match up as it
goes down the chain. You wouldn’t normally need to use this configuration option,
it’s used to provide an optional capability that’s covered in some certificate standards
documents.
Some certificate chains may not contain or be signed by a trusted CA certificate, but
may end in a root CA certificate with an unknown trust level. Since the cryptlib trust
manager can’t provide any information about this certificate, it won’t be possible to
verify the chain. If you want to trust the root CA certificate you can use the cryptlib
trust management mechanisms to handle this, as explained in “Certificate Trust
Management” on page 241.
Exporting Certificate Chains
As is the case when signing certificates and certificate chains, cryptlib gives you a
high degree of control over what part of the chain you want to export. By specifying
an export format of CRYPT_CERTFORMAT_CERTIFICATE or CRYPT_-
CERTFORMAT_CERTCHAIN, you can control whether a single certificate or an
entire chain is exported. The exact details are as follows:
Object type Export format Result
Certificate Certificate Certificate
Certificate Certificate chain Certificate chain, length = 1
Certificate chain Certificate Currently selected certificate in
the chain
Certificate chain Certificate chain Certificate chain
For example the following code exports the currently selected certificate in the chain
as a single certificate:
CRYPT_CERTIFICATE cryptCertChain;
void *certificate;
int certificateLength;
Since each revocation entry can have its own attributes, moving the entry cursor from
one entry to another can change the attributes that are visible. This means that if
you’re working with a particular entry, the attributes for that entry will be visible, but
attributes for other entries won’t be. To complicate this further, CRLs can also
contain global attributes that apply to, and are visible for, all entries in the CRL.
cryptlib will automatically handle these for you, allowing access to all attributes (both
per-entry and global) that apply to the currently selected revocation entry.
Creating CRLs
To create a CRL, you first create the CRL certificate object as usual and then push
one or more certificates to be revoked into it.
CRYPT_CERTIFICATE cryptCRL;
As has already been mentioned, you must be a CA in order to issue a CRL, and you
can only revoke certificates that you have issued using the certificate used to sign the
CRL (you can’t, for example, revoke a certificate issued by another CA, or revoke a
certificate issued with one CA certificate using a different CA certificate). If you try
to add certificates issued by multiple CAs to a CRL, or try to sign a CRL with a CA
certificate that differs from the one that signed the certificates in the CRL, cryptlib
will return a CRYPT_ERROR_INVALID error to indicate that the certificate you are
trying to add to the CRL or sign the CRL with is from the wrong CA. To reiterate:
Every certificate in a given CRL must have been issued using the CA certificate
which is used to sign the CRL. If your CA uses multiple certificates (for example a
Class 1 certificate, a Class 2 certificate, and a Class 3 certificate) then it must issue
one CRL for each certificate class. cryptlib will perform the necessary checking for
you to ensure you don’t issue an invalid CRL.
If you’re acting as a CA and issuing CRLs for certificates then a much easier way to
handle this is to use cryptlib’s certificate management capabilities as described in
“Issuing a CRL” on page 190, since this takes care of all of these details for you.
Advanced CRL Creation
The code shown above creates a relatively straightforward, simple CRL with no extra
information included with the revocation. You can also include extra attributes such
as the time of the revocation (which may differ from the time the CRL was issued, if
you don’t specify a time then cryptlib will use the CRL issuing time), the reason for
the revocation, and the various other CRL-specific information as described in “CRL
Extensions” on page 254.
If you set a revocation time with no revoked certificates present in the CRL, cryptlib
will use this time for any certificates you add to the CRL for which you don’t
explicitly set the revocation time so you can use this to set a default revocation time
for any certificates you add. If you set a revocation time and there are revoked
certificates present in the CRL, cryptlib will set the time for the currently selected
certificate, which will be either the last one added or the one selected with the
certificate cursor commands.
For example to revoke a list of certificates, setting the revocation date for each one
individually you would use:
CRYPT_CERTIFICATE cryptCRL;
while( moreCerts )
{
CRYPT_CERTIFICATE revokedCert;
time_t revocationTime;
/* Clean up */
cryptDestroyCert( revokedCert );
}
240 Certificates in Detail
You can also add additional attributes such as the reason for the revocation to each
revoked certificate, a number of standards recommend that a reason is given for each
revocation. The revocation codes are specified in “CRL Extensions” on page 254.
CRLs can be signed, verified, imported, and exported just like other certificate
objects.
/* The certificate has been revoked, get the revocation time and
reason */
cryptGetAttributeString( cryptCRL, CRYPT_CERTINFO_REVOCATIONDATE,
&revocationTime, &revocationTimeLength );
cryptGetAttribute( cryptCRL, CRYPT_CERTINFO_CRLREASON,
&revocationReason );
}
Note that the revocation reason is an optional CRL component, so this may not be
present in the CRL. If the revocation reason isn’t present, cryptlib will return
CRYPT_ERROR_NOTFOUND.
Automated CRL Checking
As you can see from the description of the revocation checking process above, it
quickly becomes unmanageable as the number of CRLs and the size of each CRL
increases, since what should be a simple certificate validation check now involves
checking the certificate against any number of CRLs (CRLs are generally regarded as
a rather unsatisfactory solution to the problem of certificate revocation, but we’re
stuck with them for the foreseeable future).
In order to ease this complex and long-winded checking process, cryptlib provides the
ability to automatically check a certificate against CRLs stored in a cryptlib database
keyset. To do this you first need to write the CRL or CRLs to the keyset as if they
were normal certificates, as explained in “Writing a Key to a Keyset” on page 150.
cryptlib will take each complete CRL and record all of the individual revocations
contained in it for later use.
Certificate Trust Management 241
Once you have a keyset containing revocation information, you can use it to check
the validity of a certificate using cryptCheckCert, giving the keyset as the second
parameter:
CRYPT_KEYSET cryptKeyset;
This setting will now be applied automatically to the certificate’s usage permissions,
so that even if its CRYPT_CERTINFO_KEYUSAGE attribute allowed signing and
encryption, the CRYPT_CERTINFO_TRUSTED_USAGE attribute would restrict
this to only allow encryption.
To remove any restrictions and allow all usages specified by CRYPT_CERTINFO_-
KEYUSAGE, delete the CRYPT_CERTINFO_TRUSTED_USAGE attribute, which
allows the full range of usage types that are present in CRYPT_CERTINFO_-
KEYUSAGE:
cryptDeleteAttribute( cryptCertificate,
CRYPT_CERTINFO_TRUSTED_USAGE );
You can get and set a CA certificate’s implicitly trusted status using the CRYPT_-
CERTINFO_TRUSTED_IMPLICIT attribute, which takes as value a boolean flag
that indicates whether the CA certificate is implicitly trusted or not. To mark a CA
certificate as trusted you would use:
cryptSetAttribute( certificate, CRYPT_CERTINFO_TRUSTED_IMPLICIT, 1 );
Since the trust of a CA propagates down to the certificates it issues, the trust setting in
this case applies to the whole chain rather than just one certificate in it. In other
words if the chain is signed by a trusted CA, the entire chain beyond that point will be
regarded as trusted.
If the result is set to true (a nonzero value) then the CA certificate is implicitly trusted
by cryptlib. In practice you won’t need to bother with this checking, since cryptlib
will do it for you when it verifies certificate chains.
The certificate trust settings are part of cryptlib’s configuration options, which are
explained in more detail in “Working with Configuration Options” on page 287. Like
all configuration options, changes to the trust settings only remain in effect during the
current session with cryptlib unless you explicitly force them to be committed to
permanent storage by resetting the configuration changed flag. For example if you
change the trust settings for various CA certificates and want the new trust values to
be applied when you use cryptlib in the future you would use code like:
/* Mark various CA certificates as trusted and one as untrusted */
cryptSetAttribute( certificate1, CRYPT_CERTINFO_TRUSTED_IMPLICIT, 1 );
cryptSetAttribute( certificate2, CRYPT_CERTINFO_TRUSTED_IMPLICIT, 1 );
cryptSetAttribute( certificate3, CRYPT_CERTINFO_TRUSTED_IMPLICIT, 1 );
cryptSetAttribute( certificate4, CRYPT_CERTINFO_TRUSTED_IMPLICIT, 0 );
Certificate Trust Management 243
Marking a CA certificate as untrusted doesn’t mean that it can never be trusted, but
merely that its actual trust status is currently unknown. If the untrusted certificate is
signed by a trusted CA certificate (possibly several levels up a certificate chain) then
the certificate will be regarded as trusted when cryptlib checks the certificate chain.
In practice an untrusted CA certificate is really a certificate whose precise trust level
has yet to be determined rather than a certificate which is explicitly not trusted. If
you want to explicitly not trust a certificate for one or more types of usage, you can
do this using the CRYPT_CERTINFO_TRUSTED_USAGE attribute.
244 Certificate Extensions
Certificate Extensions
Certificate extensions form by far the most complicated portion of certificates. By
default, cryptlib will add appropriate certificate extension attributes to certificates for
you if you don’t add any, but sometimes you may want to add or change these
yourself. cryptlib supports extensions in two ways, through the usual add/get/delete
attribute mechanism for extensions that it recognises, and through
cryptAddCertExtension, cryptGetCertExtension, and cryptDeleteCertExtension
for general extensions that it doesn’t recognise. The general extension handling
mechanism allows you to add, query, and delete any kind of extension to a certificate,
including ones that you define yourself.
Because of the high level of complexity of many of these extensions combined with
the fact that most are rarely, if ever used, processing of the more complicated and/or
obscure extensions are disabled by default, see “Certificate Compliance Level
Checking” on page 213 for more detail on the different levels of processing. For each
of the following extensions, the description lists which level it’s available at.
Extension Structure
X.509 version 3 introduced a mechanism by which additional information could be
added to certificates through the use of certificate extensions. The X.509 standard
defined a number of extensions, and over time other standards organisations defined
their own additions and amendments to these extensions. In addition private
organisations, businesses, and individuals have all defined their own extensions, some
of which (for example the extensions from Netscape and Microsoft) have seen a
reasonably wide amount of use. An extension contains three main pieces of
information:
Field Description
Type The extension type, a unique identifier called an object
identifier. This is given as a sequence of numbers that trace
a path through an object identifier tree. For example the
object identifier for the keyUsage extension is 2 5 29 15.
The object identifier for cryptlib is 1 3 6 1 4 1 3029 32.
Critical Flag A flag that defines whether the extension is important
enough that it must be processed by an application. If the
critical flag is set and an application doesn’t recognise the
extension, it will reject the certificate.
Since some standards (including X.509 itself) allow
implementations to selectively ignore non-critical extensions,
and support for extensions is often haphazard, it may be
necessary to mark an extension as critical in order to ensure
that other implementations process it. As usual, you should
check to see whether your intended target correctly processes
the extensions that you plan to use.
Value The extension data, corresponding to a cryptlib attribute
group for more complex composite extensions, or a single
cryptlib attribute for a few very simple extensions.
For the extensions that cryptlib recognises, the handling of the critical flag is
automatic. For extensions that cryptlib doesn’t handle itself, you need to set the
critical flag yourself when you add the extension data using
cryptAddCertExtension.
terminology referring to extensions rather than the general term attribute group will
be used here.
cryptlib can identify attributes in extensions/attribute groups in one of three ways:
1. Through an extension identifier that denotes the entire extension/attribute group.
For example CRYPT_CERTINFO_CERTPOLICIES denotes the
certificatePolicies extension/attribute group.
2. Through an attribute identifier that denotes a particular attribute within an
extension/attribute group. For example CRYPT_CERTINFO_CERTPOLICY
denotes the policyIdentifier attribute contained within the certificatePolicies
extension/attribute group.
Some extensions/groups only contain a single attribute, in which case the
extension identifier is the same as the attribute identifier. For example the
CRYPT_CERTINFO_KEYUSAGE extension contains a single attribute which is
also identified by CRYPT_CERTINFO_KEYUSAGE.
3. Through the attribute cursor mechanism that allows you to step through a set of
extensions extension by extension or attribute by attribute. Attribute cursor
management is explained in more detail in “Attribute Lists and Attribute Groups”
on page 42.
You can use the extension/group identifier to determine whether a particular
extension is present with cryptGetAttribute (it will return CRYPT_ERROR_-
NOTFOUND if the extension isn’t present), to delete an entire extension with
cryptDeleteAttribute, and to position the extension cursor at a particular extension.
Attributes within extensions/group are handled in the usual manner, for example to
retrieve the value of the basicConstraints CA attribute (which determines whether a
certificate is a CA certificate) you would use:
int isCA;
To determine whether the entire basicConstraints extension is present you would use:
int basicConstraintsPresent;
You don’t have to worry about the structure of individual extensions since cryptlib
will handle this for you. For example to make a certificate a CA certificate, all that
you need to do is:
cryptSetAttribute( certificate, CRYPT_CERTINFO_CA, 1 );
and cryptlib will construct the basicConstraints extension for you and set up the CA
attribute as required. Because the basicConstraints extension is a fundamental
X.509v3 extension, cryptlib will in fact always add this by default even if you don’t
explicitly specify it.
Composite Extension Attributes
Attributes that contain complete GeneralNames and/or DNs are composite attributes
that have further items within them. These are handled in the standard way using the
attribute cursor: You first move the cursor to the attribute that contains the
GeneralName or DN that you want to work with and then get, set, or delete attributes
within it:
cryptSetAttribute( certificate, CRYPT_CERTINFO_CURRENT_FIELD,
CRYPT_CERTINFO_PERMITTEDSUBTREES );
cryptSetAttributeString( certificate, CRYPT_CERTINFO_RFC822NAME,
rfc822Name, rfc822NameLength );
cryptSetAttributeString( certificate, CRYPT_CERTINFO_DNSNAME, dnsName,
dnsNameLength );
246 Certificate Extensions
X.509 Extensions
X.509 version 3 and assorted additional standards and revisions specify a large
number of extensions, all of which are handled by cryptlib. In addition there are a
number of proprietary and vendor-specific extensions that are also handled by
cryptlib.
In the following descriptions only the generally useful attributes have been described.
The full range of attributes is enormous, requires several hundred pages of standards
specifications to describe them all, and will probably never be used in real life. These
attributes are marked with “See certificate standards documents” to indicate that you
should refer to other documents to obtain information about their usage (this is also a
good indication that you shouldn’t really be using this attribute).
Alternative Names
The subject and issuer altNames are used to specify all the things that aren’t suitable
for the main certificate DNs. The issuer altName is identified by CRYPT_-
CERTINFO_ISSUERALTNAME and the subject altName is identified by CRYPT_-
CERTINFO_SUBJECTALTNAME. Both consist of a single GeneralName whose
use is explained in “Extended Certificate Identification Information” on page 228.
This extension is valid in certificates, certification requests and CRLs, is available at
all certificate processing levels, and can contain one of each type of GeneralName
component.
X.509 Extensions 247
Basic Constraints
This is a standard extension identified by CRYPT_CERTINFO_-
BASICCONSTRAINTS and is used to specify whether a certificate is a CA
certificate or not. If you don’t set this extension, cryptlib will set it for you and mark
the certificate as a non-CA certificate. This extension is valid in certificates, attribute
certificates and certification requests, is available at all certificate processing levels,
and has the following attributes:
Attribute/Description Type
CRYPT_CERTINFO_CA Boolean
Whether the certificate is a CA certificate or not. When used with attribute
certificates, the CA is called an authority, so cryptlib will also accept the
alternative CRYPT_CERTINFO_AUTHORITY, which has the same
meaning as CRYPT_CERTINFO_CA. If this attribute isn’t set, the
certificate is treated as a non-CA certificate.
CRYPT_CERTINFO_PATHLENCONSTRAINT Numeric
See certificate standards documents.
For example to mark a certificate as a CA certificate you would use:
cryptSetAttribute( certificate, CRYPT_CERTINFO_CA, 1 );
Attribute/Description Type
CRYPT_CERTINFO_ISSUERDOMAINPOLICY String
The object identifier for the source (issuer) policy.
CRYPT_CERTINFO_SUBJECTDOMAINPOLICY String
The object identifier for the destination (subject) policy.
A CA can also specify acceptable policy constraints for use in certificate chain
validation. The policyConstraints extension is identified by CRYPT_CERTINFO_-
POLICYCONSTRAINTS, is valid in certificates, and is available at the
CRYPT_COMPLIANCELEVEL_PKIX_FULL processing level:
Attribute/Description Type
CRYPT_CERTINFO_REQUIREEXPLICITPOLICY Numeric
See certificate standards documents.
CRYPT_CERTINFO_INHIBITPOLICYMAPPING Numeric
See certificate standards documents.
Finally, a CA can inhibit the use of the special-case anyPolicy policy. The
inhibitAnyPolicy extension is identified by CRYPT_CERTINFO_-
INHIBITANYPOLICY, is valid in certificates, and is available at the
CRYPT_COMPLIANCELEVEL_PKIX_FULL processing level:
Attribute/Description Type
CRYPT_CERTINFO_INHIBITANYPOLICY Numeric
See certificate standards documents.
Directory Attributes
This extension, identified by CRYPT_CERTINFO_SUBJECTDIRECTORY-
ATTRIBUTES, allows additional X.500 directory attributes to be specified for a
certificate. This extension is valid in certificates, is available at the
CRYPT_COMPLIANCELEVEL_PKIX_PARTIAL processing level and above, and
has the following attributes:
Attribute/Description Type
CRYPT_CERTINFO_SUBJECTDIR_TYPE String
The object identifier that identifies the type of the directory attribute.
CRYPT_CERTINFO_SUBJECTDIR_VALUES String
The value of the directory attribute.
The extKeyUsage attribute contains a collection of one or more values that specify a
specific type of extended usage that extends beyond the general keyUsage.
This extension is used by applications to determine whether a certificate is meant for
a particular purpose such as timestamping or code signing. The extension is valid in
certificates and certification requests, is available at all certificate processing levels,
and can contain any of the following values:
Value Used in
CRYPT_CERTINFO_EXTKEY_- No-op wildcard value used to
ANYKEYUSAGE work around extended key-usage
validation bugs in some software.
CRYPT_CERTINFO_EXTKEY_- Code-signing certificate.
CODESIGNING
CRYPT_CERTINFO_EXTKEY_- Directory service certificate.
DIRECTORYSERVICE
CRYPT_CERTINFO_EXTKEY_- email encryption/signing
EMAILPROTECTION certificate.
CRYPT_CERTINFO_EXTKEY_- Various IPSEC certificates.
IPSECENDSYSTEM
CRYPT_CERTINFO_EXTKEY_-
IPSECTUNNEL
CRYPT_CERTINFO_EXTKEY_-
IPSECUSER
CRYPT_CERTINFO_EXTKEY_- Microsoft certificate trust list
MS_CERTTRUSTLISTSIGNING signing and timestamping
CRYPT_CERTINFO_EXTKEY_- certificate, used for AuthentiCode
MS_TIMESTAMPSIGNING signing.
CRYPT_CERTINFO_EXTKEY_- Microsoft encrypted file system
MS_ENCRYPTEDFILESYSTEM certificate.
CRYPT_CERTINFO_EXTKEY_- Microsoft individual and
MS_INDIVIDUALCODESIGNING commercial code-signing
CRYPT_CERTINFO_EXTKEY_- certificate, used for AuthentiCode
MS_COMMERCIALCODESIGNING signing.
CRYPT_CERTINFO_EXTKEY_- Microsoft server-gated crypto
MS_SERVERGATEDCRYPTO (SGC) certificate, used to enable
strong encryption on non-US
servers.
252 Certificate Extensions
Like the keyUsage extension, the Netscape certificate type extension has a single
numeric attribute with the same identifier as the extension itself (CRYPT_-
CERTINFO_NS_CERTTYPE). This extension is valid in certificates and
certification requests, is available if processing of obscure and obsolete extensions are
enabled, and contains a bit flag that can contain any of the following values:
Value Used in
CRYPT_NS_CERTTYPE_- Object signing certificate (equivalent to
OBJECTSIGNING Microsoft’s AuthentiCode use).
CRYPT_NS_CERTTYPE_- S/MIME email encryption/signing
SMIME certificate.
CRYPT_NS_CERTTYPE_- SSL/TLS client and server certificate.
SSLCLIENT
CRYPT_NS_CERTTYPE_-
SSLSERVER
CRYPT_NS_CERTTYPE_- CA certificates corresponding to the above
SSLCA certificate types. Using these flags requires
CRYPT_NS_CERTTYPE_- the basicConstraints CA value to be set.
SMIMECA
CRYPT_NS_CERTTYPE_-
OBJECTSIGNINGCA
This extension is obsolete and is supported as a read-only attribute by cryptlib. If you
try to set this extension cryptlib will return CRYPT_ERROR_PERMISSION to
indicate that you can’t set this attribute value.
Name Constraints
The nameConstraints extension is used to constrain the certificate’s subjectName and
subject altName to lie inside or outside a particular DN subtree or substring, with the
excludedSubtrees attribute taking precedence over the permittedSubtrees attribute.
The principal use for this extension is to allow control of the certificate namespace, so
that a CA can restrict the ability of any CAs it certifies to issue certificates outside a
very restricted domain (for example corporate headquarters might constrain a
divisional CA to only issue certificates for its own business division). This extension
is identified by CRYPT_CERTINFO_NAMECONSTRAINTS, is valid in
certificates, and is available at the CRYPT_COMPLIANCELEVEL_PKIX_FULL
processing level:
X.509 Extensions 253
Attribute/Description Type
CRYPT_CERTINFO_PERMITTEDSUBTREES GeneralName
The subtree within which the subjectName and subject altName of any
issued certificates must lie.
CRYPT_CERTINFO_EXCLUDEDSUBTREES GeneralName
The subtree within which the subjectName and subject altName of any
issued certificates must not lie.
Due to ambiguities in the encoding rules for strings contained in DNs, it is possible to
avoid the excludedSubtrees for DNs by choosing unusual (but perfectly valid) string
encodings that don’t appear to match the excludedSubtrees. Because of this you
should rely on permittedSubtrees rather than excludedSubtrees for DN constraint
enforcement.
The nameConstraints are applied to both the certificate subject name and the subject
altName. For example if a CA run by Cognitive Cybernetics Incorporated wanted to
issue a certificate to a subsidiary CA that was only permitted to issue certificates for
Cognitive Cybernetics’ marketing division, it would set DN name constraints with:
cryptSetAttribute( certificate, CRYPT_ATTRIBUTE_CURRENT,
CRYPT_CERTINFO_PERMITTEDSUBTREES );
cryptSetAttribute( certificate, CRYPT_ATTRIBUTE_CURRENT,
CRYPT_CERTINFO_DIRECTORYNAME );
cryptSetAttributeString( certificate, CRYPT_CERTINFO_COUNTRYNAME,
"US", 2 );
cryptSetAttributeString( certificate, CRYPT_CERTINFO_ORGANIZATIONNAME,
"Cognitive Cybernetics Incorporated", 32 );
cryptSetAttributeString( certificate,
CRYPT_CERTINFO_ORGANIZATIONALUNITNAME, "Marketing", 9 );
This means that the subsidiary CA can only issue certificates to employees of the
marketing division. Note that since the excludedSubtrees attribute is a GeneralName,
the DN is selected through a two-level process, first to select the excludedSubtrees
GeneralName and then to select the DN within the GeneralName.
GeneralName components that have a flat structure (for example email addresses) can
have constraints specified through the ‘*’ wildcard. For example to extend the above
constraint to also include email addresses, the issuing CA would set a name constraint
with:
cryptSetAttribute( certificate, CRYPT_ATTRIBUTE_CURRENT,
CRYPT_CERTINFO_PERMITTEDSUBTREES );
cryptSetAttributeString( certificate, CRYPT_CERTINFO_RFC822NAME,
"*@marketing.cci.com", 19 );
This means that the subsidiary CA can only issue certificates with email addresses
within the marketing division. Note again the selection of the excludedSubtrees
GeneralName followed by the setting of the email address (if the GeneralName is still
selected from the earlier code, there’s no need to re-select it at this point).
Private Key Usage Period
This extensions specifies the date on which the private key for this certificate expires.
This extension is identified by CRYPT_CERTINFO_-
PRIVATEKEYUSAGEPERIOD, is valid in certificates, and is available at the
CRYPT_COMPLIANCELEVEL_PKIX_PARTIAL processing level and above.
This is useful where a certificate needs to have a much longer lifetime than the
private key it corresponds to, for example a long-term signature might have a lifetime
of 10-20 years, but the private key used to generate it should never be retained for
such a long period. The privateKeyUsagePeriod extension is used to specify a
(relatively) short lifetime for the private key while allowing for a very long lifetime
for the signatures it generates:
254 Certificate Extensions
Attribute/Description Type
CRYPT_CERTINFO_PRIVATEKEY_NOTBEFORE Time
CRYPT_CERTINFO_PRIVATEKEY_NOTAFTER Time
The private key usage period defines the period of time over which the
private key for a certificate object is valid. CRYPT_CERTINFO_-
PRIVATEKEY_NOTBEFORE specifies the validity start period, and
CRYPT_CERTINFO_PRIVATEKEY_NOTAFTER specifies the validity
end period.
CRL Extensions
CRLs have a number of CRL-specific extensions that are described below.
CRL Reasons, CRL Numbers, Delta CRL Indicators
These extensions specify various pieces of information about CRLs. The reasonCode
extension is used to indicate why a certificate was revoked. The cRLNumber
extension provides a serial number for CRLs. The deltaCRLIndicator indicates a
delta CRL that contains changes between a base CRL and a delta-CRL (this is used to
reduce the overall size of CRLs).
The reasonCode extension is identified by CRYPT_CERTINFO_CRLREASON, is
valid in CRLs, and is available at all certificate processing levels. The extension has
a single numeric attribute with the same identifier as the extension itself
(CRYPT_CERTINFO_CRLREASON) which contains a bit flag that can contain one
of the following values:
Value Description
CRYPT_CRLREASON_- The affiliation of the certificate owner
AFFILIATIONCHANGED has changed, so that the subjectName or
subject altName is no longer valid.
CRYPT_CERTINFO_REVOKEDGROUPS_ Numeric
REASONCODE
The reason code for the revocation.
CRYPT_CERTINFO_TOBEREVOKED_- Time
REVOCATIONTIME
The revocation time.
CRYPT_CERTINFO_REVOKEDGROUPS_ Numeric
REASONCODE
The reason code for the revocation of a group of certificates.
CRYPT_CERTINFO_REVOKEDGROUPS_ Time
INVALIDITYDATE
The revocation time for the group of certificates
Digital Signature Legislation Extensions 259
Admissions
The German signature law (SigG) specifies an extension containing information on
admissions granted to professional associations, chambers, unions, administrative
bodies, and companies. The extension is identified by CRYPT_CERTINFO_-
SIGG_ADMISSIONS, is available at the CRYPT_COMPLIANCELEVEL_PKIX_-
PARTIAL processing level and above if processing of obscure and obsolete
extensions is enabled, and contains the following attributes:
260 Certificate Extensions
Attribute/Description Type
CRYPT_CERTINFO_SIGG_ADMISSIONS_AUTHORITY GeneralName
The authority granting the admission.
CRYPT_CERTINFO_SIGG_ADMISSIONS_ String
NAMINGAUTHID
The ASN.1 object identifier for the naming authority that administers the
title granted by the admission.
CRYPT_CERTINFO_SIGG_ADMISSIONS_ String
NAMINGAUTHURL
The URL for the naming authority that administers the title granted by the
admission.
CRYPT_CERTINFO_SIGG_ADMISSIONS_ String
NAMINGAUTHTEXT
Text describing the naming authority that administers the title granted by the
admission.
CRYPT_CERTINFO_SIGG_ADMISSIONS_ String
PROFESSIONITEM
Text describing the admission being granted.
CRYPT_CERTINFO_SIGG_ADMISSIONS_ String
PROFESSIONOID
ASN.1 object identifier for the admission being granted.
CRYPT_CERTINFO_SIGG_ADMISSIONS_ String
REGISTRATIONNUMBER
Registration number within the admission being granted.
Certificate Hash
The German signature law (SigG) specifies an OCSP extension containing the hash
of the certificate in an OCSP response. Note that this is actually an OCSP extension
even though it’s specified in certificate digital signature legislation. The extension is
identified by CRYPT_CERTINFO_SIGG_CERTHASH, is available at the CRYPT_-
COMPLIANCELEVEL_PKIX_PARTIAL processing level and above if processing
of obscure and obsolete extensions is enabled, and contains the following attributes:
Attribute/Description Type
CRYPT_CERTINFO_SIGG_CERTHASH Binary data
See SigG standards documents.
Declaration of Majority
The German signature law (SigG) specifies an extension containing a declaration of
majority for the certificate holder. The extension is identified by CRYPT_-
CERTINFO_SIGG_DECLARATIONOFMAJORITY, is available at the CRYPT_-
Digital Signature Legislation Extensions 261
Reliance Limit
The German signature law (SigG) specifies an extension containing a reliance limit
for the certificate, which specifies the (recommended) monetary reliance limit for the
certificate. The extension is identified by CRYPT_CERTINFO_SIGG_-
MONETARYLIMIT, is available at the CRYPT_COMPLIANCELEVEL_PKIX_-
PARTIAL processing level and above if processing of obscure and obsolete
extensions is enabled, and contains the following attributes:
Attribute/Description Type
CRYPT_CERTINFO_SIGG_MONETARY_CURRENCY String
The three-letter currency code.
CRYPT_CERTINFO_SIGG_MONETARY_AMOUNT Integer
The amount, specified as an integer in the range 1…200.
CRYPT_CERTINFO_SIGG_MONETARY_EXPONENT Integer
The exponent for the amount, specified as an integer 1…200, so that the
actual value is amount 10exponent.
Restrictions
The German signature law (SigG) specifies an extension containing any other general
free-form restrictions that may be imposed on the certificate. The extension is
identified by CRYPT_CERTINFO_SIGG_RESTRICTION, is available at the
CRYPT_COMPLIANCELEVEL_PKIX_PARTIAL processing level and above if
processing of obscure and obsolete extensions is enabled, and contains the following
attributes:
Attribute/Description Type
CRYPT_CERTINFO_SIGG_RESTRICTION String
Text containing any further restrictions not already handled via certificate
policies or constraints.
Signature Delegation
The German signature law (SigG) specifies an extension containing details about
signature delegation, in which one party may sign on behalf of another (for example
someone’s secretary signing correspondence on their behalf). The extension is
identified by CRYPT_CERTINFO_SIGG_PROCURATION, is available at the
CRYPT_COMPLIANCELEVEL_PKIX_PARTIAL processing level and above if
processing of obscure and obsolete extensions is enabled, and contains the following
attributes:
262 Certificate Extensions
Attribute/Description Type
CRYPT_CERTINFO_SIGG_PROCURE_- String
TYPEOFSUBSTITUTION
The type of signature delegation being performed (for example “Signed on
behalf of”).
CRYPT_CERTINFO_SIGG_PROCURE_SIGNINGFOR GeneralName
The identity of the person or organisation the signer is signing on behalf of.
Attribute/Description Type
CRYPT_CERTINFO_IPADDRESSBLOCKS_- String
ADDRESSFAMILY
A two-byte address family identifier (AFI), either 00 01 for IPv4 or 00 02
for IPv6.
CRYPT_CERTINFO_IPADDRESSBLOCKS_PREFIX String
An IP address block prefix for an IP address range controlled by the
certificate holder.
CRYPT_CERTINFO_IPADDRESSBLOCKS_MIN String
CRYPT_CERTINFO_IPADDRESSBLOCKS_MAX String
The start and end of an address range controlled by the certificate holder.
Note that a single ipAddrBlocks extension may contain dozens or even hundreds of
these values.
The encoding of the address block ranges is done using a peculiar format specified in
the RPKI documentation which requires, instead of the usual 1.2.3.4/28-style
encoding, the use of a non-standard ASN.1 BIT STRING encoding to convey the
address prefix or address ranges. Because the resulting BIT STRING isn’t in any
standard form, you need to provide it to cryptlib as a pre-encoded blob starting with
an 03 type specifier, a one-byte length, a one-byte unused-bits count, and then the IP
address prefix as a variable-length bit string. See the RPKI standards documentation
for exact details on how to encode this.
Autonomous Systems IDs
The autonomousSysIds extension contains information on AS numbers allocated to
the certificate holder. The extension is identified by CRYPT_CERTINFO_-
AUTONOMOUSSYSIDS, is valid in certificates and certification requests, and is
available at the CRYPT_COMPLIANCELEVEL_PKIX_PARTIAL processing level
and above:
Attribute/Description Type
CRYPT_CERTINFO_AUTONOMOUSSYSIDS_- Numeric
ASNUM_ID
An AS number controlled by the certificate holder.
CRYPT_CERTINFO_AUTONOMOUSSYSIDS_- Numeric
ASNUM_MIN
CRYPT_CERTINFO_AUTONOMOUSSYSIDS_- Numeric
ASNUM_MAX
The start and end of a range of AS numbers controlled by the certificate
holder.
Note that a single autonomousSysIds extension may contain dozens or even hundreds
of these values.
SET Extensions
SET specifies a number of extensions beyond the X.509v3 ones that are described
below.
SET Card Required and Merchant Data
These extensions specify various pieces of general information used in the SET
electronic payment protocol.
The cardRequired extension contains a flag indicating whether a card is required for a
transaction. The extension is identified by CRYPT_CERTINFO_SET_-
CERTCARDREQUIRED, is valid in certificates and certification requests, and is
available if processing of obscure and obsolete extensions is enabled. The extension
contains a single boolean attribute with the same identifier as the extension itself
264 Certificate Extensions
Attribute/Description Type
CRYPT_CERTINFO_SET_ROOTKEYTHUMBPRINT Binary data
Binary string containing the root key thumbprint (see the SET standards
documents).
You can obtain the key hash which is required for the thumbprint from another
certificate by reading its CRYPT_CERTINFO_SUBJECTKEYIDENTIFIER attribute
and then adding it to the certificate you’re working with as the CRYPT_-
CERTINFO_SET_ROOTKEYTHUMBPRINT attribute. cryptlib will perform the
further work required to convert this attribute into the root key thumbprint.
The tunnelling extension contains a tunnelling indicator and algorithm identifier. The
extension is identified by CRYPT_CERTINFO_SET_TUNNELING, is valid in
certificates and certification requests, and is available if processing of obscure and
obsolete extensions is enabled.
Attribute/Description Type
CRYPT_CERTINFO_SET_TUNNELINGFLAG Boolean
CRYPT_CERTINFO_SET_TUNNELINGALGID String
See SET standards documents.
Application-specific Extensions
Various applications such as certificate management protocols have their own
extensions that extend or complement the X.509 ones. These are described below.
OCSP Extensions
These extensions specify various pieces of certificate management information used
in the OCSP certificate management protocol.
The noCheck extension indicates that the certificate should be automatically trusted
when used to sign OCSP responses. The extension is identified by CRYPT_-
CERTINFO_OCSP_NOCHECK, is valid in certificates and certification requests,
and is available at the CRYPT_COMPLIANCELEVEL_PKIX_PARTIAL processing
level and above. The extension contains a numeric attribute with the same identifier
as the extension itself (CRYPT_CERTINFO_OCSP_NOCHECK) which is always
set to CRYPT_UNUSED since it has no inherent value associated with it.
Attribute/Description Type
CRYPT_CERTINFO_OCSP_NOCHECK Numeric
See OCSP standards documents.
Vendor-specific Extensions
A number of vendors have defined their own extensions that extend or complement
the X.509 ones. These are described below.
Netscape Certificate Extensions
Netscape defined a number of extensions that mostly predate the various X.509v3
extensions that now provide the same functionality. The various Netscape certificate
extensions are available if processing of obscure and obsolete extensions is enabled
and are:
Extension/Description Type
CRYPT_CERTINFO_NS_BASEURL String
A base URL which, if present, is added to all partial URL’s in Netscape
extensions to create a full URL.
CRYPT_CERTINFO_NS_CAPOLICYURL String
The URL at which the certificate policy under which this certificate was
issued can be found.
266 Certificate Extensions
CRYPT_CERTINFO_NS_CAREVOCATIONURL String
The URL at which the revocation status of a CA certificate can be checked.
CRYPT_CERTINFO_NS_CERTRENEWALURL String
The URL at which a form allowing renewal of this certificate can be found.
CRYPT_CERTINFO_NS_COMMENT String
A comment which should be displayed when the certificate is viewed.
CRYPT_CERTINFO_NS_REVOCATIONURL String
The URL at which the revocation status of a server certificate can be
checked.
CRYPT_CERTINFO_NS_SSLSERVERNAME String
A wildcard string containing a shell expression that matches the hostname of
the SSL server using this certificate.
Note that each of these entries represent a separate extension containing a single text
string, they have merely been listed in a single table for readability. You should
avoid using these extensions if possible and instead use one of the standard X.509v3
extensions.
Thawte Certificate Extensions
Thawte Consulting have defined an extension that allows the use of certificates with
secure extranets. This extension is identified by CRYPT_CERTINFO_-
STRONGEXTRANET, is valid in certificates and certification requests, and is
available if processing of obscure and obsolete extensions is enabled:
Attribute/Description Type
CRYPT_CERTINFO_STRONGEXTRANET_ZONE Numeric
CRYPT_CERTINFO_STRONGEXTRANET_ID Binary data
Extranet zone and ID.
Generic Extensions
Beyond the standardised extensions listed above there exist any number of obscure or
non-standard certificate extensions. cryptlib allows you to work with these
extensions using cryptAddCertExtension, cryptGetCertExtension, and
cryptDeleteCertExtension, which allow you to add, retrieve, or delete a complete
encoded extension identified by its ASN.1 object identifier. The extension data must
be a complete DER-encoded ASN.1 object without the OCTET STRING wrapper
which is used for all extensions (cryptlib will add this itself). For example if you
wanted to add a 4-byte UTF8 string as an extension the data would be 0C 04 xx
xx xx xx. If you pass in extension data to cryptAddCertExtension that isn’t a
valid ASN.1-encoded object, cryptlib will return CRYPT_ERROR_PARAM4 to
indicate that the data is in an invalid format.
If a certificate object contains a non-standard extension, cryptlib won’t include it in
the object when you sign it unless you set the CRYPT_OPTION_CERT_-
SIGNUNRECOGNISEDATTRIBUTES option to true. This is to avoid problems
where a CA could end up signing arbitrary data in an unrecognised certificate
extension.
If the extension you are trying to add is already handled as a standard extension,
cryptlib will return CRYPT_ERROR_PERMISSION to indicate that you can’t add
the extension in this manner but have to add it using cryptSetAttribute/
cryptSetAttributeString.
CMS/SMIME Attributes 267
CMS/SMIME Attributes
The CMS and S/MIME standards specify various attributes that can be included with
signatures. In addition there are a variety of proprietary and vendor-specific
attributes that are also handled by cryptlib. In the following description only the
generally useful attributes have been described, the full range of attributes is
enormous and requires a number of standards specifications (often followed by cries
for help on mailing lists) to interpret them. These attributes are marked with “See
S/MIME standards documents” to indicate that you should refer to other documents
to obtain information about their use (this is also a good indication that you shouldn’t
really be using this attribute).
Content Type
This is a standard CMS attribute identified by CRYPT_CERTINFO_CMS_-
CONTENTTYPE and is used to specify the type of data which is being signed. This
is used because some signed information could be interpreted in different ways
depending on the data type it’s supposed to represent (for example something viewed
as encrypted data could be interpreted quite differently if viewed as plain data). If
you don’t set this attribute, cryptlib will set it for you and mark the signed content as
plain data.
The content-type CMS attribute can contain one of the following CRYPT_-
CONTENT_TYPE values:
Value Description
CRYPT_CONTENT_DATA Plain data.
CRYPT_CONTENT_- Signed data.
SIGNEDDATA
CRYPT_CONTENT_- Data encrypted using a password or
ENVELOPEDDATA public-key or conventional encryption.
CRYPT_CONTENT_- Data which is both signed and enveloped
SIGNEDANDENVELOPED- (this is an obsolete composite content
DATA type that shouldn’t be used).
CRYPT_CONTENT_- Hashed data.
DIGESTEDDATA
CRYPT_CONTENT_- Data encrypted directly with a session
ENCRYPTEDDATA key.
CRYPT_CONTENT_- Compressed data.
COMPRESSEDDATA
CRYPT_CONTENT_TSTINFO Timestamp token generated by a
timestamp authority (TSA).
CRYPT_CONTENT_- Indirectly signed data used in
SPCINDIRECTDATA- Authenticode signatures.
CONTEXT
The distinction between the different types arises from the way they are specified in
the standards documents, as a rule of thumb if the data being signed is encrypted then
268 Other Certificate Object Extensions
If you’re generating the signature via the cryptlib enveloping code then cryptlib will
set the correct type for you so there’s no need to set it yourself.
Countersignature
This CMS attribute contains a second signature that countersigns one of the
signatures on the data (that is, it signs the other signature rather than the data). The
attribute is identified by CRYPT_CERTINFO_CMS_COUNTERSIGNATURE:
Attribute/Description Type
CRYPT_CERTINFO_CMS_COUNTERSIGNATURE Binary data
See S/MIME standards documents.
Message Digest
This read-only CMS attribute is used as part of the signing process and is generated
automatically by cryptlib. The attribute is identified by CRYPT_CERTINFO_-
CMS_MESSAGEDIGEST:
Attribute/Description Type
CRYPT_CERTINFO_CMS_MESSAGEDIGEST Binary data
The hash of the content being signed.
Signing Description
This CMS attribute contains a short text message with an additional description of the
data being signed. For example if the signed message was a response to a received
signed message, the signing description might contain an indication of the type of
message it’s being sent in response to. Note that CMS has a number of special-
purpose signing attributes such as message receipt information that allow automated
processing of messages that contain them, so you should only use this free-form
human-readable attribute for cases that aren’t covered by special-case attributes
designed for the purpose.
The attribute is identified by CRYPT_CERTINFO_CMS_SIGNINGDESCRIPTION:
Attribute/Description Type
CRYPT_CERTINFO_CMS_SIGNINGDESCRIPTION String
Free-form text annotation for the message being signed.
Signing Time
This is a standard CMS attribute identified by CRYPT_CERTINFO_CMS_-
SIGNINGTIME and is used to specify the time at which the signature was generated.
If you don’t set this attribute, cryptlib will set it for you.
Attribute/Description Type
CRYPT_CERTINFO_CMS_SIGNINGTIME Time
The time at which the signature was generated.
cryptDestroyCert( cmsAttributes );
The other attributes used when signing are standard attributes that will be added
automatically for you by cryptlib.
Content Hints
This CMS attribute can be supplied in the outer layer of a multi-layer message to
provide information on what the innermost layer of the message contains. The
attribute is identified by CRYPT_CERTINFO_CMS_CONTENTHINTS and has the
following attributes:
Attribute/Description Type
CRYPT_CERTINFO_CMS_CONTENTHINT_- String
DESCRIPTION
A human-readable description that may be useful when processing the
content.
CRYPT_CERTINFO_CMS_CONTENTHINT_TYPE Numeric
The type of the innermost content, specified as a CRYPT_CONTENT_-
content-type value.
DOMSEC Attributes
The domain security (DOMSEC) attributes are used to handle delegated signing by
systems such as mail gateways. The signature type CMS attribute, identified by
CRYPT_CERTINFO_CMS_SIGTYPEIDENTIFIER, is used to identify the signature
type, and has the following attributes:
Attribute/Description Type
CRYPT_CERTINFO_CMS_SIGTYPEID_- Numeric
ADDITIONALATTRIBUTES
Additional attributes for a domain signature.
CRYPT_CERTINFO_CMS_SIGTYPEID_DOMAINSIG Numeric
Domain signature by a gateway on behalf of a user.
CRYPT_CERTINFO_CMS_SIGTYPEID_ORIGINATORSIG Numeric
Indication that the signer is the originator of the message. This attribute isn’t
normally used, since it corresponds to a standard (non-DOMSEC) signature..
CRYPT_CERTINFO_CMS_SIGTYPEID_REVIEWSIG Numeric
Review signature to indicate that the domain signer has reviewed the
message.
Attribute/Description Type
CRYPT_CERTINFO_CMS_MLEXP_ENTITYIDENTIFIER Binary data
See S/MIME standards documents.
CRYPT_CERTINFO_CMS_MLEXP_TIME Time
The time at which the mailing-list software processed the message.
CRYPT_CERTINFO_CMS_MLEXP_NONE —
CRYPT_CERTINFO_CMS_MLEXP_INSTEADOF General-
CRYPT_CERTINFO_CMS_MLEXP_INADDITIONTO Name
This attribute can have one of the three values specified above, and is used
to indicate a receipt policy that overrides the one given in the original
message. See the S/MIME standards documents for more information.
Nonce
This CMS attribute nonce is used to prevent replay attacks. The attribute is identified
by CRYPT_CERTINFO_CMS_NONCE:
Attribute/Description Type
CRYPT_CERTINFO_CMS_NONCE Binary data
Nonce to prevent replay attacks.
Receipt Request
This CMS attribute is used to request a receipt from the recipient of a message and is
identified by CRYPT_CERTINFO_CMS_RECEIPT_REQUEST. As with the
security label attribute, you shouldn’t rely on the recipient of a message being able to
do anything with this information, which consists of the following attributes:
Attribute/Description Type
CRYPT_CERTINFO_CMS_RECEIPT_- Binary data
CONTENTIDENTIFIER
A magic value used to identify a message, see the S/MIME standards
documents for more information.
CRYPT_CERTINFO_CMS_RECEIPT_FROM Numeric
CRYPT_CERTINFO_CMS_RECEIPT_TO General-
Name
An indication of who receipts should come from and who they should go to,
see the S/MIME standards documents for more information.
SCEP Attributes
The Simple Certificate Enrolment Protocol uses a variety of protocol-specific
attributes that are attached to CMS signed data and are used to manage the operation
of the protocol. These attributes are not normally used with CMS but are provided
for use by cryptlib’s SCEP implementation. The SCEP attributes are:
272 Other Certificate Object Extensions
Attribute/Description Type
CRYPT_CERTINFO_SCEP_MESSAGETYPE String
The SCEP message type.
CRYPT_CERTINFO_SCEP_PKISTATUS String
The processing status of an SCEP request.
CRYPT_CERTINFO_SCEP_FAILINFO String
Extended error information if the SCEP processing status indicates that an
error occurred.
CRYPT_CERTINFO_SCEP_SENDERNONCE Binary data
CRYPT_CERTINFO_SCEP_RECIPIENTNONCE
Nonce values used to protect against message replay attacks. Note that these
values duplicate the more usual CRYPT_CERTINFO_CMS_NONCE
attribute, which should be used in place of these attributes unless they’re
specifically being used for SCEP.
CRYPT_CERTINFO_SCEP_TRANSACTIONID String
A value that uniquely identifies the entity requesting a certificate.
In addition to these attributes, SCEP also uses an additional attribute which is added
to PKCS #10 requests even though it’s a CMS attribute. It therefore acts as a
certificate attribute rather than a CMS attribute. The attribute is identified by
CRYPT_CERTINFO_CHALLENGEPASSWORD:
Attribute/Description Type
CRYPT_CERTINFO_CHALLENGEPASSWORD String
Password used to authorise certificate issue requests.
Attribute/Description Type
CRYPT_CERTINFO_CMS_SECLABEL_POLICY String
The object identifier for the security policy that the security label is issued
under.
CRYPT_CERTINFO_CMS_SECLABEL_- Numeric
CLASSIFICATION
The security classification for the content identified relative to the security
policy being used. There are six standard classifications (described below)
and an extended number of user-defined classifications, for more
information see the S/MIME standards documents and X.411.
CRYPT_CERTINFO_CMS_SECLABEL_PRIVACYMARK Numeric
A privacy mark value that unlike the security classification isn’t used for
access control to the message contents. See S/MIME standards documents
for more information.
CRYPT_CERTINFO_CMS_SECLABEL_CATTYPE String
CRYPT_CERTINFO_CMS_SECLABEL_CATVALUE Binary data
See S/MIME standards documents.
The security classification can have one of the following predefined values (which
are relative to the security policy and whose interpretation can vary from one
organisation to another), or policy-specific, user-defined values that lie outside this
range:
Value
CRYPT_CLASSIFICATION_UNMARKED
CRYPT_CLASSIFICATION_UNCLASSIFIED
CRYPT_CLASSIFICATION_RESTRICTED
CRYPT_CLASSIFICATION_CONFIDENTIAL
CRYPT_CLASSIFICATION_SECRET
CRYPT_CLASSIFICATION_TOP_SECRET
Signature Policy
This CMS attribute is used to identify the policy under which a signature was
generated, and is identified by CRYPT_CERTINFO_CMS_-
SIGNATUREPOLICYID. The signature policies extension allows a signer to
provide information on the policies governing a signature, and to control the way in
which a signature can be interpreted. For example it allows you to check that a
signature was issued under a policy you feel comfortable with (certain security
precautions taken, vetting of employees, physical security of the premises, and so on).
The certificate policies attribute is a complex extension that allows for all sorts of
qualifiers and additional modifiers (several of them exist only because this extension
was a cut & paste of a similar-looking extension that’s used with certificates). In
general you should only use the policyIdentifier attribute in this extension, since the
other attributes are difficult to support in user software and are ignored by many
implementations:
Attribute/Description Type
CRYPT_CERTINFO_CMS_SIGPOLICYID String
The object identifier that identifies the policy under which this certificate
was issued.
CRYPT_CERTINFO_CMS_SIGPOLICYHASH Binary data
The hash algorithm identifier and hash of the signature policy, see signature
standards documents.
274 Other Certificate Object Extensions
CRYPT_CERTINFO_CMS_SIGPOLICY_CPSURI String
The URL for the certificate practice statement (CPS) for this signature
policy.
CRYPT_CERTINFO_CMS_SIGPOLICY_ORGANIZATION String
CRYPT_CERTINFO_CMS_SIGPOLICY_- Numeric
NOTICENUMBERS String
CRYPT_CERTINFO_CMS_SIGPOLICY_EXPLICITTEXT
These attributes contain further qualifiers, modifiers, and text information
that amend the signature policy information. Refer to signature standards
documents for more information on these attributes.
S/MIME Capabilities
This CMS attribute provides additional information about the capabilities and
preferences of the sender of a message, allowing them to indicate their preferred
algorithm(s) and mechanism(s), as well as other S/MIME-related preferences. The
attribute is identified by CRYPT_CERTINFO_CMS_SMIMECAPABILITIES and
can contains any one or more of the following values:
Value Description
CRYPT_CERTINFO_CMS_- The sender supports the use of these
SMIMECAP_3DES encryption algorithms. When encoding
CRYPT_CERTINFO_CMS_- them, cryptlib will order them by
SMIMECAP_AES algorithm strength so that AES will be
CRYPT_CERTINFO_CMS_- preferred over triple DES which will be
SMIMECAP_CAST128 preferred over DES. In addition only
CRYPT_CERTINFO_CMS_- those algorithms that are currently
SMIMECAP_DES enabled in cryptlib will be encoded.
CRYPT_CERTINFO_CMS_-
SMIMECAP_IDEA
CRYPT_CERTINFO_CMS_- The sender supports the use of these hash
SMIMECAP_SHA1 algorithms, with the same encoding
CRYPT_CERTINFO_CMS_- procedure as for encryption algorithms
SMIMECAP_SHA2 above.
CRYPT_CERTINFO_CMS_- The sender supports the use of these
SMIMECAP_HMAC_SHA1 MAC algorithms, with the same
CRYPT_CERTINFO_CMS_- encoding procedure as for encryption
SMIMECAP_HMAC_SHA2 algorithms above.
CRYPT_CERTINFO_CMS_- The sender supports the use of these
SMIMECAP_AUTHENC128 authenticated encryption modes, with the
CRYPT_CERTINFO_CMS_- same encoding procedure as for
SMIMECAP_AUTHENC256 encryption algorithms above.
CRYPT_CERTINFO_CMS_- The sender supports the use of these
SMIMECAP_DSA_SHA1 signature mechanisms, with the same
CRYPT_CERTINFO_CMS_- encoding procedure as for encryption
SMIMECAP_ECDSA_SHA1 algorithms above.
CRYPT_CERTINFO_CMS_-
SMIMECAP_ECDSA_SHA2
CRYPT_CERTINFO_CMS_-
SMIMECAP_RSA_SHA1
CRYPT_CERTINFO_CMS_-
SMIMECAP_RSA_SHA2
CRYPT_CERTINFO_CMS_- The sender would prefer to be sent
SMIMECAP_- signed data.
PREFERSIGNEDDATA
OCSP Attributes 275
Attribute/Description Type
CRYPT_CERTINFO_CMS_SIGNINGCERTV2_ Binary data
ESSCERTIDV2
See S/MIME standards documents.
CRYPT_CERTINFO_CMS_SIGNINGCERTV2_ String
POLICIES
The object identifier for the policy that applies to the signing certificate.
OCSP Attributes
Like certificates, OCSP requests and responses can contain extensions that contain
additional information relating to the request or response. The ocspNonce extension
is used to prevent replay attacks on OCSP requests and is set automatically by
cryptlib. The ocspArchiveCutoff extension indicates the time limit to which an
OCSP responder will store revocation information for a certificate. The
ocspResponseType extension indicates the type of response you’d like to receive
from a responder.
The ocspNonce extension is identified by CRYPT_CERTINFO_OCSP_NONCE and
is valid in OCSP requests and responses. The extension has a single binary data
attribute with the same identifier as the extension itself (CRYPT_CERTINFO_-
OCSP_NONCE). Since cryptlib sets this value automatically, you can’t set it
yourself:
276 Other Certificate Object Extensions
Attribute/Description Type
CRYPT_CERTINFO_OCSP_NONCE Binary data
Nonce to prevent replay attacks.
The ocspArchiveCutoff extension is identified by CRYPT_CERTINFO_OCSP_-
ARCHIVECUTOFF and is valid in OCSP responses:
Attribute/Description Type
CRYPT_CERTINFO_OCSP_ARCHIVECUTOFF Time
The date beyond which revocation information will no longer be archived by
the responder.
The ocspResponseType extension is identified by CRYPT_CERTINFO_-
OCSP_RESPONSE and is valid in OCSP requests. This extension contains a
collection of one or more values that indicate the type of response which is being
requested from the OCSP responder. The values are:
Value Description
CRYPT_CERTINFO_OCSP_- OCSP response containing only
RESPONSE_OCSP revocation information but no actual
certificate status.
CRYPT_CERTINFO_OCSP_- RTCS response containing OK/not OK
RESPONSE_RTCS certificate status.
CRYPT_CERTINFO_OCSP_- Extended RTCS response containing
RESPONSE_RTCS_- certificate status and additional
EXTENDED information such as revocation
information.
In addition to OCSP-specific attributes, OCSP responses can also contain the CRL
attributes reasonCode, holdInstructionCode, invalidityDate, and certificateIssuer,
which are described in “CRL Extensions” on page 254.
Creating/Destroying Device Objects 277
cryptDeviceClose( cryptDevice );
Device Description
dedicated crypto core.
CRYPT_DEVICE_PKCS11 PKCS #11 crypto token. These devices
are accessed via their names, see the
section on PKCS #11 devices for more
details.
Most of the devices are identified implicitly so there’s no need to specify a device
name and you can pass null as the name parameter (the exception is PKCS #11
devices, which are covered in more detail further on). Once you’ve finished with the
device, you use cryptDeviceClose to deactivate it and destroy the device object. For
example to work with a Fortezza card you would use:
CRYPT_DEVICE cryptDevice;
cryptDeviceClose( cryptDevice );
Once you’ve initialised the device, you may need to set the supervisor PIN if the
device uses a distinct initialisation PIN:
Activating and Controlling Cryptographic Devices 279
cryptSetAttributeString( cryptDevice,
CRYPT_DEVINFO_SET_AUTHENT_SUPERVISOR, supervisorPin,
supervisorPinLength );
At this point you can carry out device-specific initialisation actions while the device
is still in the supervisor state. For example if you’re working with a Fortezza card,
you would load the CA root (PAA) certificate at this point, since it can only be loaded
when the card is first moved into the supervisor-initialised state. Since this is the
ultimately-trusted certificate in the card, it can only be loaded when the card is in this
state.
Once you’ve finished performing any optional further initialisation, you need to set a
user PIN, unless the device uses a combined user/supervisor role:
cryptSetAttributeString( cryptDevice, CRYPT_DEVINFO_SET_AUTHENT_USER,
userPin, userPinLength );
Finally, you’ll need to log on as a user with the PIN you’ve just set if the device
doesn’t do this automatically when you initially set the PIN:
cryptSetAttributeString( cryptDevice, CRYPT_DEVINFO_AUTHENT_USER,
userPin, userPinLength );
The exact initialisation details vary from device to device and driver to driver. Some
devices don’t distinguish between supervisor and user roles and so only have a single
role and PIN. Some devices require a PIN to initialise the device and then set the
supervisor PIN using a separate call, others set the supervisor PIN as part of the
initialisation call. Some devices will automatically switch over to user mode when
you set the user PIN while others require you to explicitly log on in user mode after
setting the user PIN. Finally, some devices can’t be initialised through PKCS #11 but
require proprietary vendor software to initialise them.
When the device is initialised, it usually moves through a number of states going
from uninitialised to supervisor initialised to user initialised, with strict restrictions on
what can be done in each state. For example once a supervisor has set the user PIN,
they can usually no longer change it, since the supervisor isn’t supposed to be able to
take on the user role and manipulate the device. This is why some devices
automatically log the supervisor out once the user PIN has been set. In addition some
maintenance operations such as loading initial trusted certificates can only be
performed after the device has been initialised and is still in the initial supervisor-
initialised state. Again, this prevents modification of trusted keys after the user has
been given access to the device.
A general rule of thumb is that when you go through an initialisation you have to
perform all of the steps in sequence without logging out in between, and once you’ve
initialised the device you usually can’t change any settings without re-initialising it
and starting from scratch. Individual devices may diverge from this in places, but in
general you shouldn’t assume that you can go back later and change things once
you’ve set them.
User Authentication
Before you can use the device you generally need to authenticate yourself to it with a
PIN or password. To authenticate yourself as supervisor, set the CRYPT_-
DEVINFO_AUTHENT_SUPERVISOR attribute; to authenticate yourself as user, set
the CRYPT_DEVINFO_AUTHENT_USER attribute. For example to authenticate
yourself to the device using a PIN as a normal user you would use:
cryptSetAttributeString( cryptDevice, CRYPT_DEVINFO_AUTHENT_USER, pin,
pinLength );
To authenticate yourself to the device using a PIN for supervisor-level access you
would use:
cryptSetAttributeString( cryptDevice,
CRYPT_DEVINFO_AUTHENT_SUPERVISOR, pin, pinLength );
If the PIN or password that you’ve supplied is incorrect, cryptlib will return
CRYPT_ERROR_WRONGKEY. If the device doesn’t support this type of access, it
280 Encryption Devices and Encryption Hardware
will return CRYPT_ERROR_PARAM2. Note that, as is traditional for most PIN and
password checking systems, some devices may only allow a limited number of access
attempts before locking out the user, requiring CRYPT_DEVINFO_AUTHENT_-
SUPERVISOR access to re-enable user access.
Device Zeroisation
The CRYPT_DEVINFO_ZEROISE attribute works much like CRYPT_DEVINFO_-
INITIALISE except that its specific goal is to clear any sensitive information such as
encryption keys from the device (it’s often the same as device initialisation, but
sometimes will only specifically erase the keys and in some cases may even disable
the device). In some devices you may need to supply a zeroisation PIN or the initial
supervisor PIN when you call this function, otherwise you should set the data value to
an empty string:
cryptSetAttributeString( cryptDevice, CRYPT_DEVINFO_ZEROISE, "", 0 );
After this you can use the encryption context as usual, both will function in an
identical manner with cryptlib keeping track of whether the implementation is via the
built-in functionality or the external device. In this way the use of any form of
external hardware for encryption is completely transparent after the initial step of
activating and initialising the hardware.
Note that, unlike the other functions that create cryptlib objects,
cryptDeviceCreateContext doesn’t require you to specify the identity of the user
who is to own the context which is being created. This is because the device is
already associated with a user, so there’s no need to specify this again when creating
an object within it.
For an example of how you might utilise external hardware, let’s use a generic AES
hardware accelerator (identified by the label “AES accelerator”) accessed as a PKS
#11 device. To use the AES hardware instead of cryptlib’s built-in AES
implementation you would use:
CRYPT_DEVICE cryptDevice;
CRYPT_CONTEXT cryptContext;
cryptDeviceClose( cryptDevice );
After the context has been created with cryptDeviceCreateContext, the use of the
context is identical to a standard encryption context. There is no other (perceptual)
difference between the use of a built-in implementation and an external
implementation.
Key Storage in Crypto Devices
When you create a normal public-key context and load or generate a key into it, the
context goes away when you destroy it or shut down cryptlib. If the context is
created in a crypto device, the public and private keys from the context don’t go away
when the context is destroyed but are stored inside the device for later use. You can
later recreate the context using the key stored in the device by treating the device as a
keyset containing a stored key. For example to create an RSA key in a device you
would use:
CRYPT_CONTEXT privKeyContext;
/* Create the RSA context, set a label for the key, and generate a key
into it */
cryptDeviceCreateContext( &privKeyContext, cryptUser
/* CRYPT_UNUSED */, CRYPT_ALGO_RSA );
cryptSetAttributeString( privKeyContext, CRYPT_CTXINFO_LABEL, label,
labelLength );
cryptGenerateKey( privKeyContext );
Although the context has been destroyed, the key itself is still held inside the device.
To recreate the context at a later date, you can treat the device as if it were a keyset,
using the label as the key ID:
CRYPT_CONTEXT privKeyContext;
Since you’ve already authenticated yourself to the device, you don’t need to specify a
password.
Key storage in crypto devices has additional special considerations that are covered in
“Considerations when Working with Devices” on page 282. The most notable of
these is that many devices don’t allow direct key loads into devices, and virtually all
don’t allow them to be extracted, so that the key has to be generated inside the device
(as the example code given earlier shows) and can’t leave the device except (for
conventional encryption keys) in encrypted form.
Querying Device Information
Crypto devices come in a wide range of configurations and with varying capabilities,
which can include facilities that bypass the normal device-handling operations
described here. For example a device may have a built-in keypad or other
authentication mechanism that bypasses the need to provide a PIN or password from
software. In this case it’s not necessary to log in to the device because the login
process is handled via an external mechanism. You can determine whether a device
is already logged in, or doesn’t require a login, by reading the CRYPT_DEVINFO_-
LOGGEDIN attribute. If this is set to true (any nonzero value) then the device is
already logged in, otherwise you need to provide a PIN or password to log in to the
device:
int deviceLoggedIn;
Since some devices represent removable tokens such as smart cards, it’s possible for
the user to unplug one token and plug in a new one in its place. To help you
determine which token was plugged in at the time it was accessed with
cryptDeviceOpen, you can read the device’s CRYPT_DEVINFO_LABEL attribute,
which returns the label or name of the token which is accessible via the device:
char label[ CRYPT_MAX_TEXTSIZE ];
int labelLength;
Once you’ve read the label you can use it to determine whether the required crypto
token is available via the device.
Some readers and device interfaces aren’t very good at detecting the removal of a
crypto token, or the removal of a token and insertion of a new one. For example,
many smart card readers only have a simple sensor to detect whether there’s
something present in the reader, but can’t tell whether what’s present is the original
smart card or a piece of cardboard. In addition some low-level reader drivers can’t
report the presence (or absence) of a card to the higher-level code. cryptlib will try to
contact the crypto token to check whether it’s still present and active, but can only go
as far as the underlying hardware and software will let it.
Considerations when Working with Devices
There are several considerations to be taken into account when using crypto devices,
the major one being that requiring that crypto hardware be present in a system
automatically limits the flexibility of your application. There are some cases where
the use of certain types of hardware (for example Fortezza cards) may be required,
but in many instances the reliance on specialised hardware can be a drawback.
The use of crypto devices can also complicate key management, since keys generated
or loaded into the device usually can’t be extracted again afterwards. This is a
security feature that makes external access to the key impossible, and works in the
same way as cryptlib’s own storing of keys inside it’s security perimeter. This means
that if you have a crypto device that supports (say) DES and RSA encryption, then to
export an encrypted DES key from a context stored in the device, you need to use an
RSA context also stored inside the device, since a context located outside the device
won’t have access to the DES context’s key.
Another consideration that needs to be taken into account is the data processing speed
of the device. In most cases it’s preferable to use cryptlib’s built-in implementation
of an algorithm rather than the one provided by the device because the built-in
implementation will be much faster. For example when hashing data prior to signing
it, cryptlib’s built-in hashing capabilities should be used in preference to any provided
by the device, since cryptlib can process data at the full memory bandwidth using a
processor clocked at several gigahertz while a crypto device has to move data over a
slow I/O bus to be processed by a processor typically clocked at tens of megahertz or
even a few megahertz. In addition when encrypting or decrypting data it’s generally
preferable to use cryptlib’s high-speed encryption capabilities, particularly with
devices such as smart cards and to a lesser extent PCMCIA cards, which are severely
limited by their slow I/O throughput. As a general rule of thumb, if your system
processor is running at 500 MHz or higher then it’s always faster to perform the
crypto in software rather than using crypto hardware. Because of this it’s usual to
only perform private-key operations in the crypto device.
A final consideration concerns the limitations of the encryption engine in the device
itself. Although cryptlib provides a great deal of flexibility in its software crypto
implementations, most hardware devices have only a single encryption engine
through which all data must pass (possibly augmented by the ability to store multiple
encryption keys in the device). What this means is that each time a different key is
used, it has to be loaded into the device’s encryption engine before it can be used to
encrypt or decrypt data, a potentially time-consuming process. For example if two
Fortezza Cards 283
encryption contexts are created via a device and both are used alternately to encrypt
data, the key corresponding to each context has to be loaded by the device into its
encryption engine before the encryption can begin (while most devices can store
multiple keys, few can keep more than one at a time ready for use in their encryption
engine).
As a result of this, although cryptlib will allow you to create as many contexts via a
device as the hardware allows, it’s generally not a good idea to have more than a
single context of each type in use at any one time. For example you could have a
single conventional encryption context (using the device’s crypto engine), a single
digital signature context (using the device’s public-key engine), and a single hash
context (using the device’s CPU or hash engine, or preferably cryptlib itself) active,
but not two conventional encryption contexts (which would have to share the
encryption engine) or two digital signature contexts (which would have to share the
public-key engine).
Fortezza Cards
cryptlib provides complete Fortezza card management capabilities, allowing you to
initialise and program a card, generate or load keys into it, add certificates for the
generated/loaded keys, update and change PINs, and perform other management
functions. This provides full certificate authority workstation (CAW) capabilities.
The steps involved in programming a blank Fortezza card are given in “Activating
and Controlling Cryptographic Devices” on page 278. Once the card is in the SSO
initialised state (after you’ve set the SSO PIN), you should install the CA root (PAA)
certificate in the card, since this operation is only permitted in the SSO initialised
state. The use of PAA certificates is somewhat specific to the use of Fortezza’s by
the US Government, you may want to simply load a dummy certificate at this point
and use standard CA certificates with any keys that you’ll be storing on the card.
Note that the Fortezza control firmware requires that all of the steps in the
initialisation/programming process be performed in a continuous sequence of
operations, without removing the card or closing the device. If you interrupt the
process halfway through, you’ll need to start again.
After the above programming process has completed, you can generate further keys
into the device, load certificates, and so on. This provides the same functionality as a
Fortezza CAW.
The first line of code updates the configuration information to point to the PKCS #11
driver DLL, and the second line makes the changes permanent by flushing the
configuration information to disk. For safety reasons cryptlib will always load
drivers from the Windows system directory (%SystemDirectory%) unless you
284 Encryption Devices and Encryption Hardware
specify an absolute path to the driver. This is to prevent the loading of arbitrary files
from the current directory as drivers.
Since the drivers are dynamically loaded on start-up by cryptlib, specifying a driver
as a configuration option won’t immediately make it available for use. To make the
driver available, you have to restart cryptlib or the application using it so that cryptlib
can load the driver on start-up, whereupon cryptlib will load the specified modules
and make them available as CRYPT_DEVICE_PKCS11 devices. When the module
is loaded, cryptlib will query each module for the device name, this is the name that
you should use to access it using cryptDeviceOpen.
Some devices don’t implement all of their crypto functionality in the device but
instead emulate it in software on the host PC. If you have a PKCS #11 module that
does then it’s better to use cryptlib’s native crypto capabilities because they’ll be
more efficient than those in the driver and possibly more secure as well, depending on
how carefully the driver has been written. In order to use only the real device
capabilities (rather than those emulated on the host PC), you can set the configuration
option CRYPT_OPTION_DEVICE_PKCS11_HARDWAREONLY to true (any
nonzero value) as explained in “Working with Configuration Options” on page 287.
If this option is set, cryptlib will only use capabilities that are provided by the crypto
token any not any that are emulated in software.
Accessing PKCS #11 Devices
PKCS #11 devices are identified by the device name, for example the Litronix PKCS
#11 driver identifies itself as “Litronix CryptOki Interface” so you would create a
device object of this type with:
CRYPT_DEVICE cryptDevice;
If you don’t know the device name or there’s only one device present, you can use the
special device name [Autodetect] to have cryptlib auto-detect the device for you. If
there’s more than one device present, cryptlib will use the first one it finds:
CRYPT_DEVICE cryptDevice;
Some PKCS #11 devices allow the use of multiple physical or logical crypto tokens
as part of a single device, for example a smart card reader device might have two
slots that can each contain a smart card, or the reader itself might function as a crypto
token alongside the smart card which is inserted into it. To identify a particular token
in a device, you can specify its name after the device name, separated with a double
colon. For example if the Litronix reader given in the example above contained two
smart cards, you would access the one called “Signing smart card” with:
CRYPT_DEVICE cryptDevice;
Some PKCS #11 devices and drivers have special-case requirements that need to be
taken into account when you use them. For example some removable tokens may
require special handling for token changes if the reader doesn’t support automatic
insertion detection, some drivers may have problems if the application forks (under
Unix), and so on. You should consult the vendor documentation for the crypto device
and drivers that you’ll be using to check for any special requirements that you need to
meet when you use the device.
CryptoAPI 285
CryptoAPI
The following section is intended for forwards-compatibility with future versions of
cryptlib. Although some portions of this interface may be implemented, you shouldn’t
rely on them in applications.
The CryptoAPI interface provides access to the encryption, signature, and hashing
capabilities of the underlying CryptoAPI implementation. All of these facilities are
already provided by cryptlib, so it’s primary purpose is to provide access to PKCS
#12/PFX private keys and certificates held in Windows’ internal (proprietary) key
store, and by extension keys imported to it from other applications. Using the
CryptoAPI interface provides full access to all keys generated by and stored inside
Windows, while still allowing the use of all standard cryptlib functionality and
facilities.
Since CryptoAPI is a software implementation managed entirely by the host
operating system, there is no need to perform any initialisation, user authentication, or
other operations like zeroisation, when using a CryptoAPI device. Initialisation was
performed when the operating system was installed, and authentication is performed
when the user logs in or the dæmon or service that uses the keys is activated. This
means that using the CryptoAPI device consists of no more than creating the device
object and then utilising it in subsequent crypto operations. All keys and certificates
that are accessed through the device will be ones stored in CryptoAPI, giving cryptlib
full access to the host operating system’s keys and crypto capabilities.
length identifier for each operation. These handles work just like file handles and are
an opaque value that your HAL uses internally but that cryptlib just treats as an
arbitrary integer to pass to the HAL.
The personality-lookup operation is performed using the function hwLookpuItem():
status = hwLookupItem( keyID, keyIDlength, &keyHandle );
If the lookup succeeds the function returns status CRYPT_OK and sets keyHandle to
the handle value to be used in future operations. If it fails it returns an appropriate
status code, for example CRYPT_ERROR_NOTFOUND if the personality isn’t
present in the crypto hardware. Future crypto operations are then performed using
the keyHandle, following the pattern ‘fileHandle = open( … );
read( fileHandle, … );’.
More details on implementing your own HAL can be found in the sample file
devices/hw_dummy.c.
Querying cryptlib’s Capabilities 287
Miscellaneous Topics
This chapter covers various miscellaneous topics not covered in other chapters such
as how to obtain information about the encryption capabilities provided by cryptlib,
how to obtain information about a particular encryption context, and how to ensure
that your code takes advantage of new encryption capabilities provided with future
versions of cryptlib.
This will simply return a status value without trying to return algorithm information.
CRYPT_ALGO_TYPE cryptAlgo;
Some configuration options which contain values that apply to individual objects can
also be set for that one object type rather than as a global setting. These options
include timeouts for session objects, key size and key setup parameters for encryption
contexts, and encryption and hash algorithms for envelopes. For example to set the
encryption algorithm to be used when enveloping data in one particular envelope to
IDEA you would use:
cryptSetAttribute( cryptEnvelope, CRYPT_OPTION_ENCR_ALGO,
CRYPT_ALGO_IDEA );
A few of the options are used internally by cryptlib and are read-only (this is
indicated in the options’ description). These will return CRYPT_ERROR_-
PERMISSION if you try to modify them to indicate that you don’t have permission to
change this option.
Saving Configuration Options
The changes you make to the configuration options only last while your program is
running or while cryptlib is loaded. In order to make the changes permanent, you can
save them to a permanent storage medium such as a hard disk by setting the
CRYPT_OPTION_CONFIGCHANGED option to FALSE, indicating that the in-
memory settings will be synced to disk so that the two match up. cryptlib will
automatically reload the saved options when it starts.
The location of the saved configuration options depend on the system type on which
cryptlib is running:
System Location
BeOS $(HOME)/.cryptlib/cryptlib.p15
Unix
DOS ./cryptlib.p15
OS/2
MVS CRYPTLIB P15
VM/CMS
Tandem $system.system.cryptlib
Windows 3.x Windows/cryptlib/cryptlib.p15
Windows \Documents and Settings\user_name\Application
Windows CE Data\cryptlib\cryptlib.p15 or \Windows\All
Users\Application Data\cryptlib\cryptlib.p15 or
\Windows\Profiles\user_name\Application
Data\cryptlib.p15 or \Users\user_name\AppData\-
Roaming (this varies depending on the OS type and
version, and is determined by the Windows application
data CSIDL)
Where the operating system supports it, cryptlib will set the security options on the
configuration information so that only the person who created it (and, usually, the
system administrator) can access it. For example under Unix the file access bits are
set to allow only the file owner (and, by extension, the superuser) to access the file,
and under Windows with NTFS the file ACLs are set so that only the user who owns
it can access or change it.
292 Miscellaneous Topics
Random Numbers
Several cryptlib functions require access to a source of cryptographically strong
random numbers. The random-data-gathering operation is controlled with the
cryptAddRandom function, which can be used to either inject your own random
information into the internal randomness pool or to tell cryptlib to poll the system for
random information. To add your own random data (such as keystroke timings when
the user enters a password) to the pool, use:
cryptAddRandom( buffer, bufferLength );
In addition to user-supplied and built-in randomness sources, cryptlib will check for a
/dev/random, EGD, or PRNGD-style style randomness driver (which continually
accumulates random data from the system) and will use this as a source of
randomness. If running on a system with a hardware random number source
(provided by some CPUs and chipsets), cryptlib will also make use of the hardware
random number source. cryptlib can also make use of additional entropy seeding
information on embedded systems without inherent entropy sources, see “Embedded
Systems” on page 314 for more information.
cryptlib includes in its built-in generator an ANSI X9.17 / ANSI X9.31 generator for
FIPS 140 certification purposes. Full technical details of the generator are given in
the reference in “Recommended Reading” on page 14.
Gathering Random Information
cryptlib can also gather its own random data by polling the system for random
information. There are two polling methods you can use, a fast poll that returns
immediately and retrieves a moderate amount of random information, and a slow poll
that may take some time but that retrieves much larger amounts of random
information. A fast poll is performed with:
cryptAddRandom( NULL, CRYPT_RANDOM_FASTPOLL );
In general you should sprinkle these throughout your code to build up the amount of
randomness in the pool.
A slow poll is performed with:
cryptAddRandom( NULL, CRYPT_RANDOM_SLOWPOLL );
The effect of this call varies depending on the operating system. Under DOS the call
returns immediately (see below). Under Windows 3.x the call will get all the
information it can in about a second, then return (there is usually more information
present in the system than can be obtained in a second). Under BeOS, OS/2, and on
Working with Newer Versions of cryptlib 293
the Macintosh, the call will get all the information it can and then return. Under
Unix, Windows and Windows CE the call will spawn one or more separate processes
or threads to perform the polling and will return immediately while the poll continues
in the background.
Before the first use of a high-level function such as envelopes, secure sessions, or
calling cryptGenerateKey or cryptExportKey you must perform at least one slow
poll (or, in some cases, several fast polls — see below) in order to accumulate enough
random information for use by cryptlib. On most systems cryptlib will perform a
non-blocking randomness poll, so you can usually do this by calling the slow poll
routine when your program starts. This ensures that the random information will
have accumulated by the time you need it:
/* Program start-up */
cryptGenerateKey( cryptContext );
If you forget to perform a slow poll beforehand, the high-level function will block
until the slow poll completes. The fact that the call is blocking is usually fairly
obvious, because your program will stop for the duration of the randomness poll. If
no reliable random data is available then the high-level function that requires it will
return the error CRYPT_ERROR_RANDOM.
Obtaining Random Numbers
You can obtain random data from cryptlib by using an encryption context with an
algorithm that produces byte-oriented output (for example a block cipher employed in
a stream mode like CFB). To obtain random data, create a context, generate a key
into it, and use the context to generate the required quantity of output by encrypting
the contents of a buffer. Since the encryption output is random, it doesn’t matter
what the buffer initially contains. For example you can use the AES algorithm in
CFB mode to generate random data with:
CRYPT_CONTEXT cryptContext;
This will fill the data buffer with the required number of random bytes.
CRYPT_ALGO_TYPE cryptAlgo;
The action you would perform would typically be building a list of available
algorithms and allowing the user to choose the one they preferred. The same can be
done for the public-key, hash, and MAC algorithms.
If your code follows these guidelines, it will automatically handle any new encryption
algorithms that are added in newer versions of cryptlib. If you are using the shared
library or DLL form of cryptlib, your software’s encryption capabilities will be
automatically upgraded every time cryptlib is upgraded.
Working with Newer Versions of cryptlib 295
Error Handling
Each function in cryptlib performs extensive parameter and error checking (although
monitoring of error codes has been omitted in the code samples for readability). In
addition each of the built-in encryption algorithms can perform a self-test procedure
that checks the implementation using standard test vectors and methods given with
the algorithm specification (typically FIPS publications, ANSI or IETF standards, or
standard reference implementations). This self-test is used to verify that each
encryption algorithm is performing as required.
The macros cryptStatusError() and cryptStatusOK() can be used to
determine whether a return value denotes an error condition, for example:
CRYPT_CONTEXT cryptContext;
int status;
The error codes that can be returned are grouped into a number of classes that cover
areas such as function parameter errors, resource errors, and data access errors.
The first group contains a single member, the “no error” value:
Error code Description
CRYPT_OK No error.
The next group contains parameter error codes that identify erroneous parameters
passed to cryptlib functions:
Error code Description
CRYPT_ERROR_- There is a problem with a parameter passed to a
PARAM1… cryptlib function. The exact code depends on the
CRYPT_ERROR_- parameter in error.
PARAM7
The next group contains resource-related errors such as a certain resource not being
available or initialised:
Error code Description
CRYPT_ERROR_- The operation, for example a public-key encryption or
FAILED decryption, failed.
CRYPT_ERROR_- The object or attribute that you have tried to initialise
INITED has already been initialised previously.
CRYPT_ERROR_- There is not enough memory available to perform this
MEMORY operation.
CRYPT_NOSECURE cryptlib cannot perform an operation at the requested
security level (for example allocated pages can’t be
locked into memory to prevent them from being
swapped to disk, or an LDAP connection can’t be
established using SSL).
CRYPT_ERROR_- The object or attribute that you have tried to use hasn’t
NOTINITED been initialised yet, or a resource which is required
isn’t available.
CRYPT_ERROR_- Not enough random data is available for cryptlib to
RANDOM perform the requested operation.
296 Error Handling
The next group contains cryptlib security violations such as an attempt to use the
wrong object for an operation or to use an object for which you don’t have access
permission:
Error code Description
CRYPT_ERROR_- An operation that consists of multiple steps (such as a
COMPLETE message hash) is complete and cannot be continued.
CRYPT_ERROR_- An operation that consists of multiple steps (such as a
INCOMPLETE message hash) is still in progress and requires further
steps before it can be regarded as having completed.
CRYPT_ERROR_- The public/private key context or certificate object or
INVALID attribute is invalid for this type of operation.
CRYPT_ERROR_- The requested operation is not available for this object
NOTAVAIL (for example an attempt to load an encryption key into
a hash context, or to decrypt a Diffie-Hellman shared
integer with an RSA key).
CRYPT_ERROR_- You don’t have permission to perform this type of
PERMISSION operation (for example an encrypt-only key being used
for a decrypt operation, or an attempt to modify a read-
only attribute).
CRYPT_ERROR_- An external event such as a signal from a hardware
SIGNALLED device caused a change in the state of the object. For
example if a smart card is removed from a card reader,
all the objects that had been loaded or derived from the
data on the smart card would return CRYPT_ERROR_-
SIGNALLED if you tried to use them.
Once an object has entered this state, the only available
option is to destroy it, typically using
cryptDestroyObject.
CRYPT_ERROR_- The operation timed out, either because of a general
TIMEOUT timeout while accessing an object such as a network
connection or data file, or because the object was in use
for another operation such as a key database lookup.
CRYPT_ERROR_- The key being used to decrypt or verify the signature
WRONGKEY on a piece of data is incorrect.
The next group contains errors related to the higher-level encryption functions such
as enveloping, secure session, and key export/import and signature
generation/checking functions:
Error code Description
CRYPT_ERROR_- The data item (typically encrypted or signed data, or a
BADDATA key certificate) was corrupt, or not all of the data was
present, and it can’t be processed.
CRYPT_ERROR_- There is too much data for this function to work with.
OVERFLOW For an enveloping function, you need to call
cryptPopData before you can add any more data to the
envelope.
For a certificate function this means the amount of data
you have supplied is more than what is allowed for the
field you are trying to store it in.
For a public-key encryption or signature function this
means there is too much data for this public/private key
to encrypt/sign. You should either use a larger
public/private key (in general a 1024-bit or larger key
Extended Error Reporting 297
To obtain more information on why an attempt to read a key from a key database
failed you would use
CRYPT_KEYSET cryptKeyset;
CRYPT_HANDLE publicKey
int status;
Note that in some cases the error message being returned is passed up from
underlying software or hardware, and will be specific to the implementation. For
example if the software that underlies a keyset database is SQL Server then the data
returned will be an SQL Server error message. Since the returned data contains low-
level error information coming from the underlying software and will often be
information provided by a third-party or remote client or server application, the
contents of the error message can vary somewhat but the will typically contain some
indication of what the problem is.
In some cases an object access or operation will be blocked by the cryptlib security
kernel and never get to the object itself. This typically occurs when cryptlib returns a
CRYPT_ERROR_PERMISSION error, in which the kernel has prevented a
disallowed access type. In this case none of the extended error information will be
set, since the object never saw the access attempt.
300 Complete Code Samples
Utility Functions
The first few code sample are utility functions that are used in the rest of the code.
createDeviceSession opens a session with a crypto device like a smart card or HSM:
int createDeviceSession( CRYPT_DEVICE *userDevice,
const char *devicePassword )
{
CRYPT_DEVICE cryptDevice;
int status;
return( CRYPT_OK );
}
/* Clear any existing certificates under this name that may already
be present. This is useful for the sample code when re-running
it multiple times and creating new keys on each run */
status = cryptGetAttributeString( cryptCertificate,
CRYPT_CERTINFO_COMMONNAME, name, &nameLen );
if( cryptStatusOK( status ) )
{
name[ nameLen ] = '\0';
Utility Functions 301
return( status );
}
return( CRYPT_OK );
}
return( CRYPT_OK );
}
return( CRYPT_OK );
}
return( CRYPT_OK );
}
Key/Certificate Examples
The next set of code samples use the utility functions above to create keys and
certificates. createSimplifiedCert creates a simplified certificate for a user with the
given name, optional email address, and optional server DNS name. Note that this
isn’t a standard CA-issued certificate but merely one intended for use as a convenient
key container:
int createSimplifiedCert( CRYPT_CERTIFICATE *userCertificate,
const CRYPT_CONTEXT certKey,
const char *certOwnerName,
const char *certOwnerEmail,
const char *certOwnerDNSName )
{
CRYPT_CERTIFICATE cryptCertificate;
int status;
return( CRYPT_OK );
}
generateKey generates a key and simplified certificate for a user with the given
name, optional email address, and optional server DNS name. There are two versions
of this, one that uses a standard file keyset and a second that uses an encryption
device:
int generateKey( const char *keyOwnerName, const char *keyOwnerEmail,
const char *keyOwnerDNSName, const char *keyLabel,
const char *privKeysetName,
const char *privKeyPassword,
const char *pubKeysetName )
{
CRYPT_CONTEXT cryptContext;
CRYPT_CERTIFICATE cryptCertificate;
CRYPT_KEYSET cryptKeyset;
int status;
/* Generate a key */
status = cryptCreateContext( &cryptContext, CRYPT_UNUSED,
CRYPT_ALGO_RSA );
if( cryptStatusError( status ) )
return( status );
Key/Certificate Examples 305
/* Clean up */
cryptDestroyContext( cryptContext );
cryptDestroyCert( cryptCertificate );
return( status );
}
int generateKeyDevice( const char *keyOwnerName,
const char *keyOwnerEmail,
const char *keyOwnerDNSName,
const char *keyLabel,
const char *devicePassword,
const char *pubKeysetName )
{
CRYPT_CONTEXT cryptContext;
CRYPT_CERTIFICATE cryptCertificate;
CRYPT_DEVICE cryptDevice;
int status;
/* Clear any existing key(s) with this label that may already be
present in the device. As is the case when publishing the
public key to a public-key keyset, this is useful when re-
running the sample code multiple times */
( void ) cryptDeleteKey( cryptDevice, CRYPT_KEYID_NAME, keyLabel );
/* Clean up */
cryptDestroyContext( cryptContext );
cryptDestroyCert( cryptCertificate );
if( cryptStatusError( status ) )
cryptDeleteKey( cryptDevice, CRYPT_KEYID_NAME, keyLabel );
cryptDeviceClose( cryptDevice );
return( status );
}
Encryption/Decryption Examples
The next set of code samples encrypt and decrypt data. encryptMessage public-key
encrypts data in a block of memory for the given recipient:
int encryptMessage( const void *inData, const int inDataLength,
void *outData, const int outDataMaxLength,
int *outDataLength, const char *pubKeysetName,
const char *recipientName,
const CRYPT_FORMAT_TYPE formatType )
{
CRYPT_ENVELOPE cryptEnvelope;
CRYPT_KEYSET cryptKeyset;
int bytesCopied, status;
return( status );
}
case CRYPT_ENVINFO_PRIVATEKEY:
/* We're using a keyset for decryption, we need to
supply the password to decrypt the private key */
status = cryptSetAttributeString( cryptEnvelope,
CRYPT_ENVINFO_PASSWORD, privKeyPassword,
strlen( privKeyPassword ) );
break;
default:
/* Something unexpected happened */
status = -1;
}
}
}
if( cryptStatusOK( status ) )
status = cryptFlushData( cryptEnvelope );
if( cryptStatusError( status ) )
{
cryptDestroyEnvelope( cryptEnvelope );
return( status );
}
return( status );
}
Signing/Verification Examples
The next set of code samples sign and verify data. signMessage signs data in a block
of memory:
int signMessage( const void *inData, const int inDataLength,
void *outData, const int outDataMaxLength,
int *outDataLength, const char *privKeysetName,
const char *privKeyLabel,
const char *privKeyPassword,
const CRYPT_FORMAT_TYPE formatType )
Signing/Verification Examples 309
{
CRYPT_ENVELOPE cryptEnvelope;
CRYPT_CONTEXT cryptContext;
int bytesCopied, status;
return( status );
}
return( status );
}
{
CRYPT_CERTIFICATE cryptCertificate;
CRYPT_SESSION cryptSession;
int status;
/* Clean up */
cryptDestroyCert( cryptCertificate );
cryptDestroySession( cryptSession );
return( status );
}
/* Clean up */
cryptDestroySession( cryptSession );
312 Complete Code Samples
return( status );
}
Client/Server Examples
The finals set of code samples work with secure client/server sessions.
fetchFromSecureServer fetches data from a secure server:
int fetchFromSecureServer( const char *serverName,
const char *command, void *outData,
const int outDataMaxLength,
int *outDataLength )
{
CRYPT_SESSION cryptSession;
int bytesCopied, status;
return( status );
}
cryptDestroySession( cryptSession );
return( status );
}
314 Embedded Systems
Embedded Systems
cryptlib has been designed to be usable in embedded designs that lack many facilities
that are normally found on standard systems, both in terms of resources (memory,
network I/O) and in system functionality (a filesystem, dynamic memory allocation).
If you’re running in a resource-constrained environment such as an embedded
system, you first need to decide what cryptlib services you require and disable any
unnecessary options, as described in “Customised and Cut-down cryptlib Versions”
on page 26. This will reduce the cryptlib code footprint to the minimum required for
your particular situation.
As a general rule of thumb if you’re on a resource-constrained system you should
turn off anything that uses networking, which includes secure sessions (USE_-
SESSIONS), and HTTP and LDAP keyset access (USE_HTTP, USE_LDAP). You
probably also want to turn off crypto devices, (USE_PKCS11 and USE_-
FORTEZZA), since the embedded system is unlikely to have PKCS #11 crypto
hardware attached to it. You probably won’t be using database keysets (USE_-
DBMS), and unless you’re using PGP keyrings you can turn that off as well (USE_-
PGPKEYS). PGP keyrings are particularly problematic because their structure
requires that they be processed via a lookahead buffer because it’s not possible to
determine how much more data associated with the key is to follow. If you’re
running in a memory-constrained environment and are thinking of using PGP keys,
you should consider using the PKCS #15 format (the cryptlib native keyset type)
instead, since this doesn’t have this problem.
For envelopes, you probably want to turn off compressed enveloping (USE_-
COMPRESSION) since zlib needs to allocate a series of fairly sizeable buffers in
order to operate (256KB for compression, 32KB for decompression, compared to
only 8KB used for the envelope buffer itself). If you’re not using PGP, you can turn
that off as well (USE_PGP). Finally, there are a considerable range of other options
that you can turn off to save memory and space, see misc/config.h for more details.
In addition to the code size tuning and if you’re targeting a new embedded system
that isn’t already supported by cryptlib, you need to make any necessary system-
specific adaptations to cryptlib to match the characteristics of the embedded device
that you’re working with. These adaptations are described following the discussion
of supported systems below.
Embedded OS Types
Many embedded OSes, and in particular real-time OSes (RTOSes) are highly
modular, and can be heavily customised to suit particular applications. Because of
this high degree of customisability, it’s not possible for cryptlib to automatically
assume that a given OS capability will be available. As a result, the default cryptlib
build for a particular embedded OS/RTOS uses a fairly minimal set of OS capabilities
that should work in most configurations. If you have extended OS facilities available,
you can use the cryptlib configuration file misc/config.h to enable any additional
capabilities that you may need. It’s a good idea to contact the cryptlib developers
before you build cryptlib on one of the more modular, configurable embedded OSes
like AMX, eCOS, µC/OS-II, µITRON, VxWorks, or XMK. Notes for individual
OSes are given below.
AMX
AMX is a highly configurable kernel with most functionality set to the minimum
level in the default build in order to conserve space. To run cryptlib you need to
enable the time/date manager (so that cryptlib can check datestamps on the data that
it’s processing), and time-slicing if you’re running multiple tasks within cryptlib. For
task synchronisation cryptlib uses AMX semaphores, but doesn’t require any further
AMX facilities like mailboxes, event groups, or buffer pools.
Embedded OS Types 315
ChorusOS
ChorusOS provides a standard Posix file API and BSD sockets networking API that
matches the one used by cryptlib’s generic Unix configuration. No special
operational considerations are required for cryptlib in this environment.
CMSIS-RTOS/mbed-rtos
CMSIS-RTOS/mbed-rtos is an embedded kernel targeted at restricted environments
employing ARM Cortex processors. In its standard configuration it doesn’t provide a
networking stack or a filesystem, so the default .build disables file I/O and
networking, and all associated services such as secure sessions and keyset storage. If
you’re using a Software Pack that provides either filesystem or network support then
you need to enable this through the appropriate configuration options as described in
“Embedded cryptlib Configuration Options” on page 318.
DOS
DOS isn’t strictly speaking an embedded OS but its facilities are limited enough that
for cryptlib’s purposes it functions as one. Since standard real-mode DOS has very
little memory available, you should shrink the object table (via CONFIG_-
CONSERVE_MEMORY and/or CONFIG_NUM_OBJECTS) to the smallest size
that you can work with. In addition you should disable all unused functionality to
conserve as much code and data space as possible. Finally, since DOS has no reliable
entropy source, you should use the CONFIG_RANDSEED mechanism to enable the
use of an external random number seed file.
eCOS
Unlike most other embedded OSes, eCOS requires that all data structures used by the
kernel be statically allocated by the user. This means that cryptlib has to allocate
storage for all semaphores, mutexes, tasks, and other eCOS objects either at compile
time or (at the latest) when it’s loaded/initialised. This entails allocating the storage
required by eCOS for each object when cryptlib allocates its kernel object table,
rather than allocating the storage on-demand when an object is created. If memory is
at a premium, you should shrink the object table (via CONFIG_CONSERVE_-
MEMORY and/or CONFIG_NUM_OBJECTS) to the smallest size that you can work
with, since each object entry has to include space for eCOS kernel data.
Typical eCOS configurations include a full TCP/IP stack and file I/O services.
cryptlib uses the Posix section 5/6 file I/O layer, the universal low-level I/O layer
that’s supported by all filesystem drivers. The TCP/IP stack is a standard BSD-
derived stack and it’s use is enabled by default in the eCOS build.
Embedded Linux
Embedded Linux is a standard Unix environment. No special operational
considerations are required for cryptlib in this environment.
FreeRTOS/OpenRTOS
FreeRTOS is an embedded realtime kernel that, in its standard configuration, doesn’t
provide a networking stack or a filesystem, so the default .build disables file I/O and
networking, and all associated services such as secure sessions and keyset storage. If
your FreeRTOS configuration contains either filesystem or network support then you
need to enable this through the appropriate configuration options as described in
“Embedded cryptlib Configuration Options” on page 318.
µITRON
µITRON has a file interface (ITRON/FILE) derived from the BTRON persistent
object store interface, but the only documentation for this is for BTRON and it’s only
available in Japanese. Because of the inability to obtain either documentation or an
implementation to code against, cryptlib only contains stubs for file I/O functionality.
316 Embedded Systems
If your µITRON system provides this file interface, please contact the cryptlib
developers.
µITRON also has a TCP/IP interface, but it doesn’t seem to be widely used and the
only documentation available is in Japanese. Because of this the use of TCP/IP under
µITRON is disabled by default in misc/config.h, if you have a µITRON TCP/IP
implementation you can use it to replace the existing TCP/IP interface in io/tcp.c.
PalmOS
When you install the PalmOS SDK, the include path for the PalmOS compiler may
not cover the directory containing the standard ANSI/ISO C headers. These headers
are found in the posix subdirectory of the standard PalmOS include directory, you
can either configure the include path to include this directory or specify it in the
makefile with the –I compiler option.
If you’re building cryptlib using the PalmOS SDK compiler, all compiler warning
messages are enabled by default and can’t be reset to a more normal level. Because
of this maximum warning level, you’ll get a stream of compiler messages when you
build cryptlib, in particular erroneous used-before-initialised messages. This is
normal, and can be ignored.
If you’re building cryptlib using the PRC toolchain, the PalmOS headers contain gcc-
specific directives that try to pull in gcc headers that lie outside the PalmOS SDK
path. If the path to these additional headers isn’t configured, you can either configure
the include path to include the directories needed by gcc or specify it in the makefile
with the -idirafter compiler option.
QNX Neutrino
QNX Neutrino is a standard Unix environment, and in general no special operational
considerations are required for cryptlib in this environment. The one exception is in
the choice of networking environments. QNX Neutrino provides three network stack
configurations, the standard TCP/IP stack, the enhanced TCP/IP stack, and a low-
resource version of the standard stack. cryptlib works with all of these stacks, and
will try and use the most sophisticated features provided by the system. If you’re
using one of the more restricted networking stacks (for example the tiny TCP/IP stack
with no IPv6 support) you may need to change the settings in io/tcp.h to reflect this.
RTEMS
RTEMS provides a standard Posix file API and BSD sockets networking API that
matches the one used by cryptlib’s generic Unix configuration. No special
operational considerations are required for cryptlib in this environment.
SMX
SMX provides a standard file API via the smxFS interface that matches the one used
by cryptlib’s generic Unix configuration. No special operational considerations are
required for cryptlib in this environment.
ThreadX
ThreadX provides a standard file API via the FileX interface and BSD sockets
networking API that matches the one used by cryptlib’s generic Unix configuration.
No special operational considerations are required for cryptlib in this environment.
uClinux
uClinux is an embedded OS intended for use on hardware without memory
protection, allowing it to be run on systems that couldn’t otherwise run a standard
Linux build. To conserve memory, you may want to configure uClinux to use the
page_alloc2/kmalloc2 allocator instead of the somewhat wasteful standard
power-of-two Linux allocator, which is intended for use on systems with virtual
memory support. cryptlib’s memory allocation strategy fits neatly with the
page_alloc2 allocator to minimise memory usage.
Embedded OS Types 317
By default the uClinux toolchains tend to allocate extremely small stacks of only
4KB, which is inadequate for all but the most trivial applications. To provide an
adequate stack, you need to either set FLTFLAGS=-s stacksize and export
FLTFLAGS to the makefile before building your application, or run flthdrs –s
stacksize on your executable after building it.
µC/OS-II
To run cryptlib under µC/OS-II you need to enable mutexes (OS_MUTEX_EN and
OS_MUTEX_DEL_EN) for task synchronisation and tasks (OS_TASK_CREATE_EN
and OS_TASK_DEL_EN) if you’re running multiple tasks within cryptlib. µC/OS-II
makes a task’s priority do double duty as the task ID, so there’s no way to uniquely
identify a task over the long term. If you change a task’s priority using
OSTaskChangePrio(), you’ll also change its task ID. This means that if you’ve
bound a cryptlib object to a task for access control purposes (see “Object Security” on
page 46), it’ll no longer be accessible once the task priority change changes its task
ID. If your tasks change their IDs in this manner, you shouldn’t bind objects to
particular task IDs.
Windows CE
Windows CE is a standard Windows environment. No special operational
considerations are required for cryptlib in this environment.
VDK
Analog Devices’ Visual DSP Kernel (VDK) is a minimal embedded kernel that
doesn’t provide a networking stack or a filesystem, so the default .build disables file
I/O and networking, and all associated services such as secure sessions and keyset
storage. If your VDK configuration contains either filesystem or network support
then you need to enable this through the appropriate configuration options as
described in “Embedded cryptlib Configuration Options” on page 318.
VxWorks
VxWorks includes a TCP/IP stack and file I/O services. cryptlib uses the ioLib file
I/O mechanisms, the universal low-level I/O layer that’s supported by all filesystem
drivers. The VxWorks TCP/IP stack has changed somewhat over time and is
sometimes replaced by more functional third-party alternatives or may not be present
at all if VxWorks has been configured without it. Because of this, the use of TCP/IP
services isn’t enabled by default. If you need networking services, you can enable
them in misc/config.h, and may need to perform VxWorks-specific network
initialisation (for example calling selectInit) if your application doesn’t already
do so.
XMK
Xilinx XMK is highly configurable kernel with several functions disabled in the
default build. To run cryptlib you need to enable mutexes
(config_pthread_mutex) for thread synchronisation, the yield interface
(config_yield) for thread management, and timers (config_time) for time
handling. In addition if you’re starting threads within cryptlib, you need to either
increase the default thread stack size (pthread_stack_size) or set a larger stack
size when you start the internal thread.
Xilinx XMK provides an emulated Posix filesystem API, however in order to reduce
code size cryptlib uses the native XMK memory filesystem (MFS) interface to access
stored data in RAM, ROM, or flash memory. If you need to store data such as
configuration options or private keys, you need to enable MFS support in your XMK
build.
XMK includes a minimal network stack (LibXilNet), however this only provides
server functionality (so it’s not possible to implement a network client) and doesn’t
support timers, so that each send or receive will block forever until data arrives or is
318 Embedded Systems
sent. Because of these limitations, you need to use a third-party network stack in
order to use cryptlib’s networking capabilities under XMK.
Option Description
with certificates will also be affected.
CONFIG_NO_DEVICES Define to disable the use of crypto device
objects.
CONFIG_NO_DYNALLOC Define to change cryptlib’s handling of
on-demand memory allocation as
described in “Devices without Dynamic
Memory Allocation” on page 322.
CONFIG_NO_ENVELOPES Define to disable the use of envelope
objects. Some secure session types that
work with envelopes will also be
affected.
CONFIG_NO_ERRORMSG Don’t include long descriptive error
messages in the code, which reduces
code size.
CONFIG_NO_KEYSETS Define to disable the use of keyset
objects. This also disables the ability to
store configuration options to persistent
storage, since these are stored in a file
keyset. Some secure session and
envelope types that work with keysets
will also be affected.
CONFIG_NO_SELFTEST Define to disable the crypto algorithm
and mechanism self-test carried out by
cryptlib on initialisation. This can speed
up cryptlib’s startup on slower
processors. Note that non-algorithm-
related self tests such as basic checks on
cryptlib kernel functioning are still
performed, to disable these as well use
CONFIG_CONSERVE_MEMORY_-
EXTRA.
CONFIG_NO_SESSIONS Define to disable the use of secure
session objects.
CONFIG_NO_STDIO Define if the target has no
filesystem/stdio support.
CONFIG_NUM_OBJECTS=n The number of objects that cryptlib
reserves room for, defaulting to 512
without CONFIG_CONSERVE_-
MEMORY defined or 64 with.
CONFIG_PKC_ALLOCSIZE The amount of memory to pre-allocate
for storage of public/private key
components, which in turn sets CRYPT_-
MAX_PKCSIZE, the maximum size of
key components that can be processed.
Setting this to 256 (2048-bit keys) rather
than the default of 512 (4096-bit keys)
will halve the amount of memory used to
hold public/private key components,
setting it to 128 (1024-bit keys) reduces
it by 75%. Setting CONFIG_-
CONSERVE_MEMORY sets
CONFIG_PKC_ALLOCSIZE to 2048
unless you’ve explicitly set it yourself.
320 Embedded Systems
Option Description
CONFIG_RANDSEED Define to use external random seed data.
CONFIG_RANDSEED_- Define to set the value of the random
QUALITY seed data, as a percentage figure from 10-
100 percent.
CONFIG_SLOW_CPU Define to disables some of the more
CPU-intensive self-tests that are
performed on cryptlib start-up. The
exact definition of a “slow” CPU is
somewhat variable, but as a rule of
thumb if you’re using a 16-bit CPU or
one clocked at under 100MHz or so then
you probably want to enable this define
to speed up the start-up process.
Finally, cryptlib includes a considerable amount of other configurability that you can
take advantage of if you need to use it in an environment that imposes particular
restrictions on resource usage. If you’re working with an embedded system, you
should contact the cryptlib developers with more details on any specific requirements
that you may have.
Once you’ve got the necessary options set up, you can build the code. If you’re
building for a completely new target, cryptlib will detect this and print messages at
the various locations in the code where you need to add system-specific adaptations
such as support for reading/writing to flash memory segments in io/file.c.
Alternatively, you can edit io/file.c before you try to build the code, look for all the
locations where CONFIG_NO_STDIO is referenced, and add the necessary support
there rather than having cryptlib warn you about it during the build process.
The seed material is stored in the same location as the cryptlib configuration data (see
“Working with Configuration Options” on page 287 for more details), and isn’t
necessarily a file but can be a block of data in flash memory, data in battery-backed
RAM, or whatever other mechanism your system uses for persistent storage. The
storage location for the data is determined by your system configuration, if there’s a
file system available then it’ll be stored in a file called randseed.dat, if not it’ll be
accessed via whatever persistent storage mechanism is configured for your system in
io/file.c.
The random seed data must be at least 128 bits (16 bytes) long, something like 128 or
256 bytes is a better value, and should be unique and random for each device. This is
extremely important since if two (or more) devices are configured with the same
random seed data or if the data from one device is such that the values stored in other
devices can be predicted from it then someone who compromises one device can
compromise the key generation on every other device. When you build your
embedded system you should install the per-device unique seed data from an external
source, for example a hardware random number generator or a copy of cryptlib
running on a secure system with a good source of randomness (the use of cryptlib to
generate random data is covered in “Random Numbers” on page 292).
Since a significant portion of the input data for key generation will be determined by
the seed data if there are no other randomness sources available (cryptlib will always
get at least some randomness from the environment, so the value will change each
time it’s used), you should take as much care as possible to protect the seed data. As
mentioned above you should always use different, unique seed data on each system,
to prevent a compromise of one system from affecting any others. In addition if your
system provides any protection mechanisms you should apply them to the seed data
to try and safeguard it as much as possible. Finally, you should use the ability to add
user-supplied randomness described in “Random Numbers” on page 292 to
periodically add any situation-specific data that you may have available. For example
if your embedded device is being used for voice or video transmission you can add
segments of the compressed audio or video data, and if your device performs a
sensor/monitoring function you can add the sensor data. Since most embedded
devices have at least some interaction with the surrounding environment, there’s
usually at least some source of additional randomness available.
Once you have your seed data set up, you need to decide how much overall
randomness it contributes to the system. You can set this value as a percentage
between 10 and 100 percent via the CONFIG_RANDSEED_QUALITY
configuration option. If you don’t set a value, cryptlib will assume a figure of 80%,
meaning that it needs to obtain an additional 20% of randomness from the
environment before it’ll generate keys. Note that this setting is merely a safety level,
it doesn’t mean that cryptlib will gather randomness until it reaches 100% and then
stop (it never stops gathering randomness), merely that it won’t generate keys when
the randomness value is below 100%.
Devices without a Real-time Clock
Most high-level crypto protocols that involve digital signatures require a real-time
clock, either to add a timestamp when the signature is created or to check the time on
the signature when it’s verified. For example certificates have a fixed validity period
that has to be checked against a time source when the certificate is verified. In order
to do this, cryptlib needs to have access to a correctly-set real-time clock.
Since a time source isn’t necessarily available on embedded systems, cryptlib won’t
require that a clock be present as it would for a non-embedded system. However if
you try to perform an operation that requires a time source such as creating or
verifying a certificate or creating a PGP or S/MIME signature, cryptlib will return a
CRYPT_ERROR_NOTAVAIL status to indicate that no time source was available
for the signature-creation or checking operation. Note that if your system has a clock
but it’s not set correctly then signature verification-related operations will fail with
time-related errors. If you plan to make use of time-related functionality then you
need to ensure that there’s an appropriate time source available.
322 Embedded Systems
The lack of a real-time clock won’t affect most protocols like SSL/TLS, SSH, or PGP
and S/MIME when used only for encryption, but will affect protocols that involve
signatures and require timestamps. In particular running a CA or a timestamping
server without a source of timestamp’s isn’t going to work very well.
Devices without a Filesystem
If the device you’re working with lacks a filesystem, you’ll need to work with
io/file.c to add an adaptation layer to handle the underlying storage abstraction that
you’re using. In embedded devices this usually consists of blocks of flash memory or
occasionally battery-backed RAM, identified either by name/label or an integer value
or tag. cryptlib supports the use of named/tagged memory segments if you build it
with the CONFIG_NO_STDIO option, and will assemble in-memory (RAM) pseudo-
files on which it performs all I/O until the file is committed to backing store,
whereupon it’ll perform an atomic transfer of the pseudo-file to flash to minimise
wear on the flash memory cells. It’s thus possible to manipulate these (pseudo-)files
arbitrarily without causing excessive wear on the underlying storage medium.
Devices without Dynamic Memory Allocation
If your system lacks dynamic memory allocation, or has so little memory that it’s
necessary to conserve it as much as possible, you first need to build cryptlib with the
CONFIG_CONSERVE_MEMORY option. This reduces the default sizes of some
buffers, and sets the initial size of cryptlib’s internal object table to 128 objects
instead of the usual 1024. You can further tune the amount of memory used by the
system object table by setting the CONFIG_NUM_OBJECTS setting to the
maximum number of objects that you’ll need. This value must be a power of 2, and
can’t be less than 8. For single-purpose use in an embedded device (for example
when used specifically for enveloping messages rather than as a general-purpose tool
where anything is possible), you can usually get by with 32 or even 16 objects.
Depending on other options such as whether you use certificate trust settings or not
and whether your system has a 16- or 32-bit word size, the cryptlib kernel and built-in
system objects consume between 6 and 12 KB of memory.
As a rough rule of thumb, each non-public-key encryption context consumes around
200 bytes (along with any extra memory needed by the algorithm’s expanded
encryption key), each public-key encryption context consumes around 1500 bytes
(depending again on algorithm-specific parameters such as the algorithm type and
key size), file keysets (which are buffered in memory as mentioned earlier) consume
600 bytes plus the size of the keyset file (usually around 1.3 KB for a standard 1024-
bit RSA key and accompanying certificate and 3 KB for the key and a 3-certificate
chain), envelopes consume 1.2KB plus 16 KB for enveloping and 8KB for de-
enveloping (the extra size is due to the built-in envelope buffer), and certificates
consume an amount of memory that isn’t easily predictable in advance since they
consist of an arbitrary number of arbitrarily-sized objects. This makes it very
difficult to estimate their eventual memory usage, but a rule of thumb is about 2 KB
used for a typical certificate. Note that the certificate object consumption has very
little to do with the key size, but is mostly dependent on the number and size of all the
other X.509 components that are present in the certificate.
within the already-allocated bounds unless it encounters some object that it needs to
store for later use. For example if it finds a certificate while processing S/MIME data
it’ll need to acquire a block of memory to store the certificate for later access by the
caller.
cryptlib Memory Usage
Almost all of the information that cryptlib processes has the potential to include
arbitrary-length data, and occasionally arbitrary amounts of arbitrary-length data.
Certificates are a particular example of this, as mentioned earlier. cryptlib’s strategy
for handling these situations is to use stack memory to handle the data if possible, but
if the item being processed exceeds a certain size, to temporarily grab a larger block
of memory from the heap to allow the item to be processed, freeing it again
immediately after use.
In normal use this overflow handling is never invoked, however since cryptlib can
always run into data items of unusual size (constructed either accidentally or
maliciously), you need to decide whether you want to allow this behaviour or not.
Allowing it means that you can process unusual data items, but may make you
vulnerable to deliberate resource-starvation attacks. Conversely, denying it makes
you immune to excessive memory usage when trying to process data maliciously
constructed to require extra memory to process, but will also make it impossible to
process data that just happens to have unusual characteristics. In general, cryptlib
will be able to process any normal data without requiring dynamically allocated
memory, so if you know in advance which types of data you’ll be processing and are
concerned about possible resource-starvation attacks, you can disable the
opportunistic allocation of larger working areas by using the
CONFIG_NO_DYNALLOC build option.
cryptlib includes a number of internal lookup tables used for certificate decoding,
algorithm information lookup, error parsing, and so on. These are all declared
static const to tell the compiler to place them in the read-only code segment (held
in ROM) rather than the initialised data segment (held in RAM). If your compiler
doesn’t automatically do this for you (almost all do), you’ll need to play with
compiler options to ensure that the tables are stored in ROM rather than RAM.
Many cryptlib functions store detailed error information as descriptive text strings
that can be retrieved through the CRYPT_ATTRIBUTE_ERRORMESSAGE
attribute. Since storage for these detailed text messages consumes ROM space, you
may want to disable them to save space, or only enable them in the debug build but
not the release build. To disable descriptive error messages (only error codes will be
returned), define CONFIG_NO_ERRORMSG.
Tracking Memory Usage
In order to track memory usage and determine what’ll be required on your target
system, you can use the CONFIG_DEBUG_MALLOC option to dump diagnostics
about memory usage to the console. This will allow you to see approximately how
much memory a certain operation will require, and let you play with rearranging
operations to reduce memory consumption. For example having two objects active
simultaneously rather than using them one after the other will result in a total memory
consumption equal to the sum of their sizes rather than only the size of the larger of
the two objects.
The memory usage diagnostics will reveal the LIFO nature of the memory allocation
that cryptlib uses to try to minimise its overall footprint. You can use the sequence
numbers after each allocate and free to track the order in which things are used.
324 Database and Networking Plugins
return( CRYPT_OK );
}
keyset/keyset.h contains the keyset-related defines that are used in the code, and the
dispatcher initialisation function sets up function pointers to the database access
routines, which are explained in more detail below. State information about a session
with the database is contained in the DBMS_STATE_INFO structure which is
defined in keyset/keyset.h. This contains both shared information such as the last
error code and the status of the session, and back-end -specific information such as
connection handles and temporary data areas. When you create an interface for a new
database type, you should add any variables that you need to the database-specific
section of the DBMS_STATE_INFO structure. When cryptlib calls your interface
functions it will pass in the DBMS_STATE_INFO that you can use to store state
information.
Database Interface Functions
The database interface functions that you need to provide are as follows:
static int openDatabase( DBMS_STATE_INFO *dbmsInfo, const char *name,
const int nameLen, const CRYPT_KEYOPT_TYPE options,
int *featureFlags )
This function is called to open a session with the database. The parameters are the
name of the database to open the session to and a set of option flags that apply to the
session. The name parameter is a composite value that depends on the underlying
database being used, usually this is simply the database name, but it can also contain
a complete user name and password in the format user:pass@server. Other
combinations are user:pass (only a database user name and password) or
user@server (only a user name and server).
The Database Backend Interface 325
This function is called to shut down the session with the database.
static int performUpdate( DBMS_STATE_INFO *dbmsInfo,
const char *command, const int commandLength,
const BOUND_DATA *boundData, DBMS_UPDATE_TYPE updateType )
This function is called to send data to the database. The parameters are an SQL
command, an optional set of bound data items, and an update type indicator that
indicates which type of update is being performed. If the boundData value is non-null
then it contains one or more bound data items that are to be added as part of the SQL
command. boundData is an array of BOUND_DATA items of type boundData.type,
with the end of the array being denoted by boundData.type == BOUND_DATA_NONE.
Other types can be BOUND_DATA_TIME (a date-and-time value),
BOUND_DATA_STRING (a text string), and BOUND_DATA_BLOB (a binary
blob). The date value needs to be converted into whatever format the database back-
end expects for a DATETIME value. The exact format depends on the back-end,
which is why it’s not present in the SQL command but is provided as a bound data
value.
For example the performUpdate() function can be called as:
performUpdate( …, "'INSERT INTO certificates VALUES ( '…', '…', …
'…' )", …, NULL, … );
performUpdate( …, "INSERT INTO certificates VALUES ( '…', '…', … ? )",
…, boundData1, … );
performUpdate( …, "INSERT INTO certificates VALUES ( ?, '…', … ? )",
…, boundData2, … );
In the first case all data is contained in the SQL command, and boundData is null. In
the second case there’s a bound value that happen to be a binary data blob associated
with the SQL command whose position is indicated by the ‘?’ placeholder. After
sending the SQL command to the database, you also need to send the {
boundData1[ 0 ].data, boundData1[ 0 ].dataLength } value. In the third case
there are two parameters that happen to be a binary data blob and a date value,
associated with the SQL command, with the positions again indicated by the ‘?’
placeholders. The types and values will be given in the boundData information so
you don’t need to worry about which parameter is of which type. In the third case,
assuming that the SQL has the blob first and the date second, boundData[ 0 ].type
will be BOUND_DATA_BLOB with { boundData1[ 0 ].data,
boundData1[ 0 ].dataLength } being the blob and boundData[ 1 ].type will be
BOUND_DATA_TIME with { boundData1[ 1 ].data,
boundData1[ 1 ].dataLength } being the time as a standard time_t value. Since
the order in the boundData matches the order in the SQL, all you have to do is iterate
through the BOUND_DATA array binding in parameter data until you reach the
BOUND_DATA_NONE marker at the end.
The update types are as follows:
326 Database and Networking Plugins
The first call begins the transaction and submits the initial portion of the transaction,
the ongoing calls submit successive portions of the transaction, and the final call
submits the last portion and commits the transaction. If there’s a problem then the
last call in the transaction will use an update type of DBMS_UPDATE_ABORT.
Note that it’s important to ensure that performUpdate() itself is atomic, for example
if there’s an error inside the function then it needs to back out of the transaction (if
one is in progress) rather than simply returning immediately to the caller. This
requires careful tracking of the state of the transaction and handling of error
conditions.
static int performQuery( DBMS_STATE_INFO *dbmsInfo,
const char *command, const int commandLength, void *data,
const int dataMaxLength, int *dataLength,
const BOUND_DATA *boundData,
const DBMS_CACHEDQUERY_TYPE queryEntry,
const DBMS_QUERY_TYPE queryType )
This function is called to fetch data from the database. The parameters are an SQL
command, an optional buffer of total size dataMaxLength to store the result, optional
bound query data as for performUpdate(), a query caching indicator (explained
further on) and a query type indicator that indicates which type of query is being
performed. The query types are as follows:
Query Type Description
DBMS_QUERY_- Cancel an ongoing query. This terminates an ongoing
CANCEL query begun by sending a DBMS_QUERY_START
query.
DBMS_QUERY_- Perform a presence check that simply returns a
present/not present indication without returning any
The Database Backend Interface 327
do
status = performQuery( …, NULL, …, buffer, bufferMaxLength,
&length, NULL, DBMS_CACHEDQUERY_NONE, DBMS_QUERY_CONTINUE );
while( cryptStatusOK( status ) );
The first call submits the query and the ongoing calls fetch successive entries in the
result set until an error status is returned (usually this is CRYPT_ERROR_-
COMPLETE to indicate that there are no more entries in the result set).
In order to allow for more efficient execution of common queries, cryptlib allows
them to be cached by the database back-end for re-use in the future. This allows the
back-end to perform the task of SQL parsing and validation against the system
catalogue, query optimisation, and access plan generation just once when the first
query is executed rather than having to re-do it for each query. cryptlib provides
hints about cached queries by specifying a cache entry number when it submits the
query. Uncached queries are given an entry number of DBMS_CACHEDQUERY_-
NONE (these will be little-used query types that it’s not worth caching) while queries
where caching are worthwhile are given an entry number from 1 to 5. The submitted
SQL for these queries will never change over subsequent calls, so it’s only necessary
to perform the parsing and processing once when the query is submitted for the first
time. Any subsequent requests can be satisfied using the previously parsed query
held at the back-end. In the above example, if the query were submitted with a
caching indicator of 2 you would prepare a query for the supplied SQL string the first
time that the query is submitted and then re-use the prepared query every time
another query with the caching indicator 2 was used.
Note that some databases may return a (potentially large) result set in response to a
query for a single result using DBMS_QUERY_NORMAL, for example by returning
further results after the first one is read or by disallowing further queries until all
results have been processed. In this you need to limit the query response size either
by setting a size limit before submitting the query or by explicitly cancelling a query
if more than one result is returned. In addition since cryptlib expects all data to be
SQL text strings (or binary data for certificate objects if the database supports it) you
may need to convert some data types such as integer values to text equivalents when
returning them in response to a query.
328 Database and Networking Plugins
This function is called before using any transport-layer functions to query whether the
transport layer is OK. It should return TRUE if it’s safe to call the other transport-
layer functions or FALSE otherwise, for example because the requested network
interface drivers aren’t loaded.
static int transportConnectFunction( STREAM *stream,
const char *server, const int port )
This function is called to shut down a connection with a remote client or server.
The Network Plugin Interface 329
This function is called to read data from a remote client or server. The behaviour of
this function differs slightly depending on read timeout handling. For blocking reads,
it should read as many bytes as are indicated in the length parameter, returning an
error if less bytes are read. For non-blocking reads it should read as many bytes as
are available (which may be zero) and return. In either case if the read succeeds it
returns a byte count.
Normally the read should wait for data to appear for the number of seconds indicated
by the timeout value stored in the stream I/O structure. However, it’s possible to
override this with the flags parameter, which can contain the following flags:
Flag Description
TRANSPORT_FLAG_- Perform a non-blocking read, overriding the
NONBLOCKING timeout value in the stream I/O structure if
necessary.
TRANSPORT_FLAG_- Perform a blocking read, overriding the timeout
BLOCKING value in the stream I/O structure if necessary.
These flags are used in cases where it’s known that a certain number of bytes must be
read in order to continue, or when the higher-level stream buffering functions want to
perform a speculative read-ahead.
static int transportWriteFunction( STREAM *stream, const BYTE *buffer,
const int length, const int flags )
This function is used to write data to a remote client or server. The flags parameter is
currently unused and should be set to TRANSPORT_FLAG_NONE.
330 Algorithms and Standards Conformance
AES
AES is a 128-bit block cipher with a 128-bit key and has the cryptlib algorithm
identifier CRYPT_ALGO_AES.
AES has been implemented as per:
FIPS PUB 197, “Advanced Encryption Standard”, 2001.
The AES code has been validated against the test vectors given in:
FIPS PUB 197, “Advanced Encryption Standard”, 2001.
CAST-128
CAST-128 is a 64-bit block cipher with a 128-bit key and has the cryptlib algorithm
identifier CRYPT_ALGO_CAST.
CAST-128 has been implemented as per:
RFC 2144, “The CAST-128 Encryption Algorithm”, Carlisle Adams, May 1997.
The CAST-128 modes of operation are given in:
ISO/IEC 8372:1987, “Information Technology — Modes of Operation for a 64-
bit Block Cipher Algorithm”.
ISO/IEC 10116:1997, “Information technology — Security techniques — Modes
of operation for an n-bit block cipher algorithm”.
The CAST-128 code has been validated against the RFC 2144 reference
implementation test vectors.
DES
DES is a 64-bit block cipher with a 56-bit key and has the cryptlib algorithm
identifier CRYPT_ALGO_DES. Note that this algorithm is no longer considered
secure and should not be used. It is present in cryptlib only for compatibility with
legacy applications.
Although cryptlib uses 64-bit DES keys, only 56 bits of the key are actually used.
The least significant bit in each byte is used as a parity bit (cryptlib will set the
correct parity values for you, so you don’t have to worry about this). You can treat
the algorithm as having a 64-bit key, but bear in mind that only the high 7 bits of each
byte are actually used as keying material.
Triple DES 331
Triple DES
Triple DES is a 64-bit block cipher with a 112/168-bit key and has the cryptlib
algorithm identifier CRYPT_ALGO_3DES.
Although cryptlib uses 128, or 192-bit DES keys (depending on whether two- or
three-key triple DES is being used), only 112 or 168 bits of the key are actually used.
The least significant bit in each byte is used as a parity bit (cryptlib will set the
correct parity values for you, so you don’t have to worry about this). You can treat
the algorithm as having a 128 or 192-bit key, but bear in mind that only the high 7
bits of each byte are actually used as keying material.
Loading a key will return a CRYPT_ERROR_PARAM3 error if the key is a weak
key. cryptExportKey will export the correct parity-adjusted version of the key.
Triple DES has been implemented as per:
ANSI X9.17, “American National Standard, Financial Institution Key
Management (Wholesale)”, 1985.
ANSI X9.52, “Triple Data Encryption Algorithm Modes of Operation”, 1999.
FIPS 46-3, “Data Encryption Standard (DES)”, 1999.
ISO/IEC 8732:1987, “Banking — Key Management (Wholesale)”.
The triple DES modes of operation are given in:
ISO/IEC 8372:1987, “Information Technology — Modes of Operation for a 64-
bit Block Cipher Algorithm”.
332 Algorithms and Standards Conformance
Diffie-Hellman
Diffie-Hellman is a key-agreement algorithm with a key size of up to 4096 bits and
has the cryptlib algorithm identifier CRYPT_ALGO_DH.
Diffie-Hellman was formerly covered by a patent in the US, this has now expired.
DH has been implemented as per:
PKCS #3, “Diffie-Hellman Key Agreement Standard”, 1991.
ANSI X9.42, “Public Key Cryptography for the Financial Services Industry —
Agreement of Symmetric Keys Using Diffie-Hellman and MQV Algorithms”,
2000.
DSA
DSA is a digital signature algorithm with a key size of up to 1024 bits and has the
cryptlib algorithm identifier CRYPT_ALGO_DSA.
DSA is covered by US patent 5,231,668, with the patent held by the US government.
This patent has been made available royalty-free to all users world-wide. The US
Department of Commerce is not aware of any other patents that would be infringed
by the DSA. US patent 4,995,082, “Method for identifying subscribers and for
generating and verifying electronic signatures in a data exchange system” (“the
Schnorr patent”) relates to the DSA algorithm but only applies to a very restricted set
of smart-card based applications and does not affect the DSA implementation in
cryptlib.
DSA has been implemented as per:
ANSI X9.30-1, “American National Standard, Public-Key Cryptography Using
Irreversible Algorithms for the Financial Services Industry”, 1993.
FIPS PUB 186, “Digital Signature Standard”, 1994.
ECDSA
ECDSA is a digital signature algorithm with a key size of up to 521 bits and has the
cryptlib algorithm identifier CRYPT_ALGO_ECDSA.
ECDSA has been implemented as per:
ANSI X9.62:2005, “Public Key Cryptography for the Financial Services Industry,
The Elliptic Curve Digital Signature Algorithm (ECDSA)”, 2005.
Although cryptlib supports the ECC algorithms ECDSA and ECDH, enabling them in
the code creates a number of issues. Due to the complexity of ECC, both the memory
and code footprints of the crypto portion of cryptlib are noticeably increased when
ECC support is enabled. In addition the ECC algorithms are extremely brittle, with
the slightest issue potentially causing problems, and the algorithms having a
distressing propensity for failing by leaking bits of the private key (this is a property
of the crypto behind the algorithms, not an implementation issue). For these reasons
you should only enable the use of ECC if it’s absolutely essential, and if you fully
understand the consequences of doing so.
ECDH
ECDH is a key-agreement algorithm with a key size of up to 521 bits and has the
cryptlib algorithm identifier CRYPT_ALGO_ECDH.
Elgamal 333
Elgamal
Elgamal is a public-key encryption/digital signature algorithm with a key size of up to
4096 bits and has the cryptlib algorithm identifier CRYPT_ALGO_ELGAMAL.
Elgamal was formerly covered (indirectly) by a patent in the US, this has now
expired.
Elgamal has been implemented as per
“A public-key cryptosystem based on discrete logarithms”, Taher Elgamal, IEEE
Transactions on Information Theory, Vol.31, No.4 (1985), p.469.
HMAC-SHA1
HMAC-SHA2
HMAC-SHA1 and HMAC-SHA2 are MAC algorithms with a key size of up to 1024
bits and have the cryptlib algorithm identifiers CRYPT_ALGO_HMAC_SHA1 and
CRYPT_ALGO_HMAC_SHA2.
HMAC-SHA1 and HMAC-SHA2 have been implemented as per:
FIPS PUB 198, “The Keyed-Hash Message Authentication Code (HMAC)”,
2002.
RFC 2104, “HMAC: Keyed-Hashing for Message Authentication”, Hugo
Krawczyk, Mihir Bellare, and Ran Canetti, February 1997.
The HMAC-SHA1 code has been validated against the test vectors given in:
“Test Cases for HMAC-MD5 and HMAC-SHA-1”, Pau-Chen Cheng and Robert
Glenn, March 1997.
IDEA
IDEA is a 64-bit block cipher with a 128-bit key and has the cryptlib algorithm
identifier CRYPT_ALGO_IDEA.
IDEA was formerly covered by patents, but these have now all expired.
IDEA has been implemented as per:
“Device for the Conversion of a Digital Block and the Use Thereof”, James
Massey and Xuejia Lai, International Patent PCT/CH91/00117, 1991.
“Device for the Conversion of a Digital Block and Use of Same”, James Massey
and Xuejia Lai, US Patent #5,214,703, 1993.
“On the Design and Security of Block Ciphers”, Xuejia Lai, ETH Series in
Information Processing, Vol.1, Hartung-Gorre Verlag, 1992.
ISO/IEC 9979, “Data Cryptographic Techniques — Procedures for the
Registration of Cryptographic Algorithms”.
The IDEA modes of operation are given in:
334 Algorithms and Standards Conformance
RC4
RC4 is an 8-bit stream cipher with a key of up to 1024 bits and has the cryptlib
algorithm identifier CRYPT_ALGO_RC4. Some weaknesses have been found in this
algorithm, and it’s proven to be extremely difficult to employ in a safe manner. For
this reason it should not be used any more except for legacy application support, and
is disabled by default.
The term “RC4” is trademarked in the US. It may be necessary to refer to it as “an
algorithm compatible with RC4” in products that use RC4 and are distributed in the
US. Common practice is to refer to it as ArcFour.
The RC4 code is implemented as per:
“The RC4 Encryption Algorithm”, Ronald Rivest, RSA Data Security Inc, 1992.
The RC4 code has been validated against RSADSI BSAFE and US Department of
Commerce test vectors.
RSA
RSA is a public-key encryption/digital signature algorithm with a key size of up to
4096 bits and has the cryptlib algorithm identifier CRYPT_ALGO_RSA.
RSA was formerly covered by a patent in the US, this has now expired.
The RSA code is implemented as per:
ANSI X9.31-1, “American National Standard, Public-Key Cryptography Using
Reversible Algorithms for the Financial Services Industry”, 1993.
ISO IEC 9594-8/ITU-T X.509, “Information Technology — Open Systems
Interconnection — The Directory: Authentication Framework”.
PKCS #1, “RSA Encryption Standard”, 1991.
SHA1
SHA1 is a message digest/hash algorithm with a digest/hash size of 160 bits and has
the cryptlib algorithm identifier CRYPT_ALGO_SHA1.
The SHA1 code has been implemented as per:
ANSI X9.30-2, “American National Standard, Public-Key Cryptography Using
Irreversible Algorithms for the Financial Services Industry”, 1993.
FIPS PUB 180, “Secure Hash Standard”, 1993.
FIPS PUB 180-1, “Secure Hash Standard”, 1994.
ISO/IEC 10118-3:1997, “Information Technology — Security Techniques —
Hash functions — Part 3: Dedicated hash functions”.
RFC 3174, “US Secure Hash Algorithm 1 (SHA1)”, 2001
The SHA1 code has been validated against the test vectors given in:
FIPS PUB 180-1, “Secure Hash Standard”, 1994.
SHA2/SHA256
SHA2/SHA256 is a message digest/hash algorithm with a digest/hash size of 256 bits
and has the cryptlib algorithm identifier CRYPT_ALGO_SHA2.
SHA2/SHA256 335
CRYPT_ALGO_TYPE
The CRYPT_ALGO_TYPE is used to identify a particular encryption algorithm.
More information on the individual algorithm types can be found in “Algorithms” on
page 295.
Value Description
CRYPT_ALGO_AES AES
CRYPT_ALGO_CAST CAST-128
CRYPT_ALGO_DES DES. This algorithm is no longer
considered secure and should not
be used except for legacy
application support.
CRYPT_ALGO_3DES Triple DES
CRYPT_ALGO_IDEA IDEA
CRYPT_ALGO_RC4 RC4. This algorithm has security
problems and should not be used
except for legacy application
support.
CRYPT_ALGO_DH Diffie-Hellman
CRYPT_ALGO_DSA DSA
CRYPT_ALGO_ECDSA ECDSA
CRYPT_ALGO_ECDH ECDH
CRYPT_ALGO_ELGAMAL Elgamal
CRYPT_ALGO_RSA RSA
CRYPT_ALGO_HMAC_SHA1 HMAC-SHA1
CRYPT_ALGO_HMAC_SHA2 HMAC-SHA2
Value Description
CRYPT_ALGO_FIRST_HASH First and last possible hash
CRYPT_ALGO_LAST_HASH algorithm type.
CRYPT_ALGO_FIRST_MAC First and last possible MAC
CRYPT_ALGO_LAST_MAC algorithm type.
CRYPT_ATTRIBUTE_TYPE
The CRYPT_ATTRIBUTE_TYPE is used to identify the attribute associated with a
cryptlib object. Object attributes are introduced in “Working with Object Attributes”
on page 39 and are used extensively throughout this manual.
CRYPT_CERTFORMAT_TYPE
The CRYPT_CERTFORMAT_TYPE is used to specify the format for exported
certificate objects. More information on exporting certificate objects is given in
“Importing/Exporting Certificates” on page 230.
Value Description
CRYPT_CERTFORMAT_- Certificate object encoded as a PKCS
CERTCHAIN #7 certificate chain. This encoding is
only possible for objects that are
certificates or certificate chains.
CRYPT_CERTFORMAT_- Certificate object encoded according
CERTIFICATE to the ASN.1 distinguished encoding
rules (DER).
CRYPT_CERTFORMAT_TEXT_- Base64-encoded text format. The
CERTCHAIN certificate object is encoded as for the
CRYPT_CERTFORMAT_TEXT_- basic CRYPT_CERTFORMAT_type
CERTIFICATE format, and an extra layer of base64
encoding with BEGIN/END
CERTIFICATE tags is added. This
format is required by some web
browsers and applications.
CRYPT_CERTTYPE_TYPE
The CRYPT_CERTTYPE_TYPE is used to specify the type of a certificate object
when used with cryptCreateCert. More information on certificates and certificate
objects is given in “Certificates and Certificate Management” on page 154.
Value Description
CRYPT_CERTTYPE_- Attribute certificate.
ATTRIBUTE_CERT
CRYPT_CERTTYPE_CERTCHAIN PKCS #7 certificate chain.
CRYPT_CERTTYPE_- Certificate.
CERTIFICATE
CRYPT_CERTTYPE_- PKCS #10 certification request.
CERTREQUEST
CRYPT_CERTTYPE_CMS_- PKCS #7/CMS attributes.
ATTRIBUTES
CRYPT_CERTTYPE_CRL CRL
CRYPT_CERTTYPE_OCSP_- OCSP request and response.
REQUEST
CRYPT_CERTTYPE_OCSP_-
338 Data Types and Constants
Value Description
RESPONSE
CRYPT_CERTTYPE_RTCS_- RTCS request and response.
REQUEST
CRYPT_CERTTYPE_RTCS_-
RESPONSE
CRYPT_CERTTYPE_PKIUSER PKI user information.
CRYPT_CERTTYPE_REQUEST_- CRMF certificate request/revocation
CERT request.
CRYPT_CERTTYPE_REQUEST_-
REVOCATION
CRYPT_DEVICE_TYPE
The CRYPT_DEVICE_TYPE is used to specify encryption hardware or an
encryption device such as a PCMCIA or smart card. More information on encryption
devices is given in “Encryption Devices and ” on page 277.
Value Description
CRYPT_DEVICE_FORTEZZA Fortezza card.
CRYPT_DEVICE_HARDWARE Native on-chip/on-device
cryptography support.
CRYPT_DEVICE_PKCS11 PKCS #11 crypto token.
CRYPT_FORMAT_TYPE
The CRYPT_FORMAT_TYPE is used to identify a data format type for exported
keys, signatures, and encryption envelopes. Of the formats supported by cryptlib, the
cryptlib native format is the most flexible and is the recommended format unless you
require compatibility with a specific security standard. More information on the
different formats is given in “Data Enveloping” on page 53, “Exchanging Keys” on
page 202, and “Signing Data” on page 208.
Value Description
CRYPT_FORMAT_CRYPTLIB cryptlib native format.
CRYPT_FORMAT_PGP PGP format.
CRYPT_FORMAT_CMS PKCS #7/CMS format.
CRYPT_FORMAT_PKCS7
CRYPT_FORMAT_SMIME As CMS but with S/MIME-
specific behaviour.
CRYPT_KEYID_TYPE
The CRYPT_KEYID_TYPE is used to identify the type of key identifier which is
being passed to cryptGetPublicKey or cryptGetPrivateKey. More information on
using these functions to read keys from keysets is given in “Reading a Key from a
Keyset” on page 145
Value Description
CRYPT_KEYID_NAME The name of the key owner.
CRYPT_KEYID_EMAIL The email address of the key
owner.
CRYPT_KEYOPT_TYPE 339
CRYPT_KEYOPT_TYPE
The CRYPT_KEYOPT_TYPE is used to contain keyset option flags passed to
cryptKeysetOpen. The keyset options may be used to optimise access to keysets by
enabling cryptlib to perform enhanced transaction management in cases where, for
example, read-only access to a database is desired. Because this can improve
performance when accessing the keyset, you should always specify whether you will
be using the keyset in a restricted access mode when you call cryptKeysetOpen.
More information on using these options when opening a connection to a keyset is
given in “Creating/Destroying Keyset Objects” on page 137
Value Description
CRYPT_KEYOPT_CREATE Create a new keyset. This option is only
valid for writeable keyset types, which
includes keysets implemented as
databases and cryptlib key files.
CRYPT_KEYOPT_NONE No special access options (this option
implies read/write access).
CRYPT_KEYOPT_READONLY Read-only keyset access. This option is
automatically enabled by cryptlib for
keyset types that have read-only
restrictions enforced by the nature of the
keyset, the operating system, or user
access rights.
Unless you specifically require write
access to the keyset, you should use this
option since it allows cryptlib to optimise
its buffering and access strategies for the
keyset.
CRYPT_KEYSET_TYPE
The CRYPT_KEYSET_TYPE is used to identify a keyset type (or, more specifically,
the format and access method used to access a keyset) when used with
cryptKeysetOpen. Some keyset types may be unavailable on some systems. More
information on keyset types is given in “Keyset Types” on page 136.
Value Description
CRYPT_KEYSET_FILE A flat-file keyset, either a cryptlib
key file or a PGP/OpenPGP key
ring.
CRYPT_KEYSET_HTTP URL specifying the location of a
certificate or CRL.
CRYPT_KEYSET_LDAP LDAP directory service.
CRYPT_KEYSET_DATABASE Generic database interface.
CRYPT_KEYSET_DATABASE_- As for the basic keyset types, but
STORE representing a certificate store for
use by a CA rather than a simple
keyset. The user who creates and
updates these keyset types must
be a CA user.
340 Data Types and Constants
CRYPT_MODE_TYPE
The CRYPT_MODE_TYPE is used to identify a particular conventional encryption
mode. More information on the individual modes can be found in “Algorithms” on
page 295.
Value Description
CRYPT_MODE_ECB ECB
CRYPT_MODE_CBC CBC
CRYPT_MODE_CFB CFB
CRYPT_MODE_GCM GCM
CRYPT_OBJECT_TYPE
The CRYPT_OBJECT_TYPE is used to identify the type of an exported key or
signature object that has been created with cryptExportKey or
cryptCreateSignature. More information on working with these objects is given in
“Querying an Exported Key Object” on page 205, and “Querying a Signature Object”
on page 209.
Value Description
CRYPT_OBJECT_ENCRYPTED_KEY Conventionally exported key
object.
CRYPT_OBJECT_KEYAGREEMENT Key agreement object.
CRYPT_OBJECT_PKCENCRYPTED_- Public-key exported key object.
KEY
CRYPT_OBJECT_SIGNATURE Signature object.
CRYPT_SESSION_TYPE
The CRYPT_SESSION_TYPE is used to identify a secure session type when used
with cryptCreateSession. More information on sessions is given in “Secure
Sessions” on page 102.
Value Description
CRYPT_SESSION_CMP CMP client/server session.
CRYPT_SESSION_CMP_SERVER
CRYPT_SESSION_SCEP SCEP client/server session.
CRYPT_SESSION_SCEP_SERVER
CRYPT_SESSION_RTCS RTCS client/server session.
CRYPT_SESSION_RTCS_SERVER
CRYPT_SESSION_OCSP OCSP client/server session.
CRYPT_SESSION_OCSP_SERVER
CRYPT_SESSION_SCVP SCVP client/server session.
CRYPT_SESSION_SCVP_SERVER
CRYPT_SESSION_SSH SSH client/server session.
CRYPT_SESSION_SSH_SERVER
CRYPT_SESSION_TLS SSL/TLS client/server session.
CRYPT_SESSION_TLS_SERVER
CRYPT_SESSION_TSP TSP client/server session.
CRYPT_SESSION_TSP_SERVER
Data Size Constants 341
Miscellaneous Constants
The following values are used for various purposes by cryptlib, for example to
specify that default parameter values are to be used, that the given parameter is
unused and can be ignored, or that a special action should be taken in response to
seeing this parameter.
Constant Description
CRYPT_KEYTYPE_PRIVATE Whether the key being passed to
CRYPT_KEYTYPE_PUBLIC cryptInitComponents()/
cryptSetComponent() is a public or
private key.
CRYPT_RANDOM_FASTPOLL The type of polling to perform to
CRYPT_RANDOM_SLOWPOLL update the internal random data pool.
CRYPT_UNUSED A value indicating that this parameter
is unused and can be ignored.
CRYPT_USE_DEFAULT A value indicating that the default
setting for this parameter should be
used.
342 Data Structures
Data Structures
This section describes the data structures used by cryptlib.
CRYPT_OBJECT_INFO Structure
The CRYPT_OBJECT_INFO structure is used with cryptQueryObject to return
information about a data object created with cryptExportKey or
cryptCreateSignature. Some of the fields are only valid for certain algorithm and
mode combinations, or for some types of data objects. If they don’t apply to the
given algorithm and mode or context, they will be set to CRYPT_ERROR, null, or
filled with zeroes as appropriate.
Field Description
CRYPT_OBJECT_TYPE objectType Data object type.
CRYPT_ALGO_TYPE cryptAlgo Encryption/signature algorithm.
CRYPT_MODE_TYPE cryptMode Encryption/signature mode.
CRYPT_ALGO_TYPE hashAlgo The hash algorithm used to hash the
data if the data object is a signature
object, or used to derive the
export/import key if the object is a
conventionally encrypted key object.
unsigned char salt[ CRYPT_MAX_- The salt used to derive the
HASHSIZE ] export/import key if the object is a
int saltLength conventionally encrypted key object.
int iterations The number of iterations of hashing
used to derive the export/import key
if the object is a conventionally
encrypted key object.
CRYPT_PKCINFO_xxx Structures
The CRYPT_PKCINFO_xxx structures are used to load public and private keys
(which contain multiple key components) into encryption contexts by setting them as
the CRYPT_CTXINFO_KEY_COMPONENTS attribute. All fields are multi-
precision integer values that are set using the cryptSetComponent() macro.
The CRYPT_PKCINFO_DLP structure is used to load keys for algorithms based on
the discrete logarithm problem, which includes keys for Diffie-Hellman, DSA, and
Elgamal. The structure contains the following fields:
Field Description
p Prime modulus.
q Prime divisor. Some DH and Elgamal keys don’t use
this parameter, in which case you should set it to an all-
zero value of the appropriate size. Note that omitting
the q parameter means that cryptlib can’t perform
certain key validity checks that it otherwise performs
when q is present.
g Element of order q mod p.
x Private random integer.
y Public random integer, gx mod p.
The CRYPT_PKCINFO_ECC structure is used to load keys for elliptic-curve
algorithms, which include keys for ECDSA and ECDH. The structure contains the
following fields:
CRYPT_QUERY_INFO Structure 343
Field Description
curveType A named curve, one of CRYPT_ECCCURVE_P192,
CRYPT_ECCCURVE_P224, CRYPT_ECCCURVE_-
P256, CRYPT_ECCCURVE_P384, CRYPT_-
ECCCURVE_P521, CRYPT_ECCCURVE_-
BRAINPOOL_P256, CRYPT_ECCCURVE_-
BRAINPOOL_P384 or CRYPT_ECCCURVE_-
BRAINPOOL_P512. When an explicit named curve is
used then the domain parameters p, a, b, gx, gy, n, and
h must be left empty.
p Prime defining Fq.
a Element in Fq defining the curve.
b Element in Fq defining the curve.
gx Element in Fq defining the point on the curve.
gy Element in Fq defining the point on the curve.
n Order of the point
h Optional cofactor
qx, qy Point Q on the curve
d Private random integer
The CRYPT_PKCINFO_RSA structure is used to load RSA public-key encryption
keys and contains the following fields:
Field Description
n Modulus.
e Public exponent.
d Private exponent. Some keys don’t include this
parameter, in which case you should set it to an all-zero
value of the appropriate size. Note that if the d
parameter is absent then the e1 and e2 values must be
present.
p Prime factor 1.
q Prime factor 2.
u CRT coefficient q-1 mod p.
e1 Private exponent 1 (PKCS #1), d mod (p-1).
e2 Private exponent 2 (PKCS #1), d mod (q-1).
The e1 and e2 components of CRYPT_PKCINFO_RSA may not be present in some
keys. cryptlib will make use of them if they are present, but can also work without
them. The loading of private keys is slightly slower if these values aren’t present
since cryptlib needs to generate them itself.
CRYPT_QUERY_INFO Structure
The CRYPT_QUERY_INFO structure is used with cryptQueryCapability to return
information about an encryption algorithm or an encryption context or key-related
certificate object (for example a public-key certificate or certification request). Some
of the fields are only valid for certain algorithm types, or for some types of
encryption contexts. If they don’t apply to the given algorithm or context, they will
be set to CRYPT_ERROR, null, or filled with zeroes as appropriate.
344 Data Structures
Field Description
char algoName[ CRYPT_MAX_- Algorithm name.
TEXTSIZE ]
int blockSize Algorithm block size in bytes.
int minKeySize The minimum, recommended, and
int keySize maximum key size in bytes (if the
int maxKeySize algorithm uses a key).
cryptAddCertExtension 345
Function Reference
cryptAddCertExtension
The cryptAddCertExtension function is used to add a generic blob-type certificate
extension to a certificate object.
int cryptAddCertExtension( const CRYPT_CERTIFICATE certificate, const char *oid, const int
criticalFlag, const void *extension, const int extensionLength );
Parameters certificate
The certificate object to which to add the extension.
oid
The object identifier value for the extension being added, specified as a sequence of
integers.
criticalFlag
The critical flag for the extension being added.
extension
The address of the extension data.
extensionLength
The length in bytes of the extension data.
Remarks cryptlib directly supports extensions from X.509, PKIX, SET, SigG, and various
vendors itself, so you shouldn’t use this function for anything other than unknown,
proprietary extensions.
See also cryptGetCertExtension, cryptDeleteCertExtension.
cryptAddPrivateKey
The cryptAddPrivateKey function is used to add a user’s private key to a keyset.
int cryptAddPrivateKey( const CRYPT_KEYSET keyset, const CRYPT_HANDLE cryptKey,
const char *password );
Parameters keyset
The keyset object to which to write the key.
cryptKey
The private key to write to the keyset.
password
The password used to encrypt the private key.
Remarks The use of a password to encrypt the private key is required when storing a private
key to a keyset, but not to a crypto device such as a smart card or Fortezza card, since
these provide their own protection for the key data.
See also cryptAddPublicKey, cryptDeleteKey, cryptGetPrivateKey, cryptGetPublicKey.
cryptAddPublicKey
The cryptAddPublicKey function is used to add a user’s public key or certificate to
a keyset.
int cryptAddPublicKey( const CRYPT_KEYSET keyset, const CRYPT_CERTIFICATE
certificate );
Parameters keyset
The keyset object to which to write the key.
346 Function Reference
certificate
The certificate to add to the keyset.
Remarks This function requires a key certificate object rather than an encryption context, since
the certificate contains additional identification information which is used when the
certificate is written to the keyset.
See also cryptAddPrivateKey, cryptDeleteKey, cryptGetPrivateKey, cryptGetPublicKey.
cryptAddRandom
The cryptAddRandom function is used to add random data to the internal random
data pool maintained by cryptlib, or to tell cryptlib to poll the system for random
information. The random data pool is used to generate session keys and
public/private keys, and by several of the high-level cryptlib functions.
int cryptAddRandom( const void *randomData, const int randomDataLength );
Parameters randomData
The address of the random data to be added, or null if cryptlib should poll the
system for random information.
randomDataLength
The length of the random data being added, or CRYPT_RANDOM_SLOWPOLL
to perform an in-depth, slow poll or CRYPT_RANDOM_FASTPOLL to perform a
less thorough but faster poll for random information.
cryptCAAddItem
The cryptCAAddItem function is used to add a certificate object to a certificate
store. cryptAddPublicKey is used to add standard certificates, this CA-specific
function can be used by CAs to add special items such as certificate requests and PKI
user information.
int cryptCAAddItem( const CRYPT_KEYSET keyset, const CRYPT_CERTIFICATE
certificate );
Parameters keyset
The certificate store to which the item will be added.
certificate
The item to add to the certificate store.
See also cryptCACertManagement, cryptCAGetItem.
cryptCACertManagement
The cryptCACertManagement function is used to perform a CA certificate
management operation such as a certificate issue, revocation, CRL issue, certificate
expiry, or other operation with a certificate store.
int cryptCACertManagement( CRYPT_CERTIFICATE *cryptCert, const
CRYPT_CERTACTION_TYPE action, const CRYPT_KEYSET keyset, const
CRYPT_CONTEXT caKey, const CRYPT_CERTIFICATE certRequest );
Parameters cryptCert
The address of the certificate object to be created.
action
The certificate management operation to perform.
keyset
The certificate store to use to perform the action.
cryptCAGetItem 347
caKey
The CA key to use when performing the action, or CRYPT_UNUSED if no key is
necessary for this action.
certRequest
The certificate request to use when performing the action, or CRYPT_UNUSED if
no request is necessary for this action.
See also cryptCAAddItem, cryptCAGetItem.
cryptCAGetItem
The cryptCAGetItem function is used to read a certificate object from a certificate
store. cryptGetPublicKey is used to read standard certificates, this CA-specific
function can be used by CAs to obtain special items such as certificate requests and
PKI user information. The item to be fetched is identified either through the key
owner’s name or their email address.
int cryptCAGetItem( const CRYPT_KEYSET keyset, CRYPT_CERTIFICATE *certificate, const
CRYPT_CERTTYPE_TYPE certType, const CRYPT_KEYID_TYPE
keyIDtype, const void *keyID );
Parameters keyset
The certificate store from which to obtain the item.
certificate
The address of the certificate object to be fetched.
certType
The item type.
keyIDtype
The type of the key ID, either CRYPT_KEYID_NAME for the name or key label,
or CRYPT_KEYID_EMAIL for the email address.
keyID
The key ID of the item to read.
See also cryptCACertManagement, cryptCAAddItem.
cryptCheckCert
The cryptCheckCert function is used to check the signature on a certificate object,
or to verify a certificate object against a CRL or a keyset containing a CRL.
int cryptCheckCert( const CRYPT_CERTIFICATE certificate, const CRYPT_HANDLE
sigCheckKey );
Parameters certificate
The certificate container object that contains the certificate item to check.
sigCheckKey
A public-key context or key certificate object containing the public key used to
verify the signature, or alternatively CRYPT_UNUSED if the certificate item is
self-signed. If the certificate is to be verified against a CRL, this should be a
certificate object or keyset containing the CRL. If the certificate is to be verified
online, this should be a session object for the server used to verify the certificate.
See also cryptSignCert.
cryptCheckSignature
The cryptCheckSignature function is used to check the digital signature on a piece
of data.
348 Function Reference
cryptCheckSignatureEx
The cryptCheckSignatureEx function is used to check the digital signature on a
piece of data with extended control over the signature information.
int cryptCheckSignatureEx( const void *signature, const int signatureLength, const
CRYPT_HANDLE sigCheckKey, const CRYPT_CONTEXT hashContext,
CRYPT_HANDLE *extraData );
Parameters signature
The address of a buffer that contains the signature.
signatureLength
The length in bytes of the signature data.
sigCheckKey
A public-key context or key certificate object containing the public key used to
verify the signature.
hashContext
A hash context containing the hash of the data.
extraData
The address of a certificate object containing extra information which is included
with the signature, or null if you don’t require this information.
See also cryptCheckSignature, cryptCreateSignature, cryptCreateSignatureEx,
cryptQueryObject.
cryptCreateCert
The cryptCreateCert function is used to create a certificate object that contains a
certificate, certification request, certificate chain, CRL, or other certificate-like
object.
int cryptCreateCert( CRYPT_CERTIFICATE *cryptCert, const CRYPT_USER cryptUser, const
CRYPT_CERTTYPE_TYPE certType );
Parameters cryptCert
The address of the certificate object to be created.
cryptUser
The user who is to own the certificate object or CRYPT_UNUSED for the default,
normal user.
certType
The type of certificate item that will be created in the certificate object.
cryptCreateContext 349
cryptCreateContext
The cryptCreateContext function is used to create an encryption context for a given
encryption algorithm.
int cryptCreateContext( CRYPT_CONTEXT *cryptContext, const CRYPT_USER cryptUser,
const CRYPT_ALGO_TYPE cryptAlgo );
Parameters cryptContext
The address of the encryption context to be created.
cryptUser
The user who is to own the encryption context or CRYPT_UNUSED for the
default, normal user.
cryptAlgo
The encryption algorithm to be used in the context.
See also cryptDestroyContext, cryptDeviceCreateContext.
cryptCreateEnvelope
The cryptCreateEnvelope function is used to create an envelope object for
encrypting or decrypting, signing or signature checking, compressing or
decompressing, or otherwise processing data.
int cryptCreateEnvelope( CRYPT_ENVELOPE *cryptEnvelope, const CRYPT_USER cryptUser,
const CRYPT_FORMAT_TYPE formatType );
Parameters cryptEnvelope
The address of the envelope to be created.
cryptUser
The user who is to own the envelope object or CRYPT_UNUSED for the default,
normal user.
formatType
The data format for the enveloped data.
See also cryptDestroyEnvelope.
cryptCreateSession
The cryptCreateSession function is used to create a secure session object for use in
securing a communications link or otherwise communicating with a remote server or
client.
int cryptCreateSession( CRYPT_SESSION *cryptSession, const CRYPT_USER cryptUser, const
CRYPT_SESSION_TYPE sessionType );
Parameters cryptSession
The address of the session to be created.
cryptUser
The user who is to own the session object or CRYPT_UNUSED for the default,
normal user.
sessionType
The type of the secure session.
See also cryptDestroySession.
350 Function Reference
cryptCreateSignature
The cryptCreateSignature function digitally signs a piece of data. The signature is
placed in a buffer in a portable format that allows it to be checked using
cryptCheckSignature.
int cryptCreateSignature( void *signature, const int signatureMaxLength, int *signatureLength,
const CRYPT_CONTEXT signContext, const CRYPT_CONTEXT
hashContext );
Parameters signature
The address of a buffer to contain the signature. If you set this parameter to null,
cryptCreateSignature will return the length of the signature in signatureLength
without actually generating the signature.
signatureMaxLength
The maximum size in bytes of the buffer to contain the signature data.
signatureLength
The address of the signature length.
signContext
A public-key encryption or signature context containing the private key used to sign
the data.
hashContext
A hash context containing the hash of the data to sign.
See also cryptCheckSignature, cryptCheckSignatureEx, cryptCreateSignatureEx,
cryptQueryObject.
cryptCreateSignatureEx
The cryptCreateSignatureEx function digitally signs a piece of data with extended
control over the signature format. The signature is placed in a buffer in a portable
format that allows it to be checked using cryptCheckSignatureEx.
int cryptCreateSignatureEx( void *signature, const int signatureMaxLength, int *signatureLength,
const CRYPT_FORMAT_TYPE formatType, const CRYPT_CONTEXT
signContext, const CRYPT_CONTEXT hashContext, const
CRYPT_CERTIFICATE extraData );
Parameters signature
The address of a buffer to contain the signature. If you set this parameter to null,
cryptCreateSignature will return the length of the signature in signatureLength
without actually generating the signature.
signatureMaxLength
The maximum size in bytes of the buffer to contain the signature data.
signatureLength
The address of the signature length.
formatType
The format of the signature to create.
signContext
A public-key encryption or signature context containing the private key used to sign
the data.
hashContext
A hash context containing the hash of the data to sign.
extraData
Extra information to include with the signature or CRYPT_UNUSED if the format
is the default signature format (which doesn’t use the extra data) or
cryptDecrypt 351
CRYPT_USE_DEFAULT if the signature isn’t the default format and you want to
use the default extra information.
See also cryptCheckSignature, cryptCheckSignatureEx, cryptCreateSignature,
cryptQueryObject.
cryptDecrypt
The cryptDecrypt function is used to decrypt or hash data.
int cryptDecrypt( const CRYPT_CONTEXT cryptContext, void *buffer, const int length );
Parameters cryptContext
The encryption context to use to decrypt or hash the data.
buffer
The address of the data to be decrypted or hashed.
length
The length in bytes of the data to be decrypted or hashed.
Remarks Public-key encryption and signature algorithms have special data formatting
requirements that need to be taken into account when this function is called. You
shouldn’t use this function with these algorithm types, but instead should use the
higher-level functions cryptCreateSignature, cryptCheckSignature,
cryptExportKey, and cryptImportKey.
See also cryptEncrypt.
cryptDeleteAttribute
The cryptDeleteAttribute function is used to delete an attribute from an object.
int cryptDeleteAttribute( const CRYPT_HANDLE cryptObject, const
CRYPT_ATTRIBUTE_TYPE attributeType );
Parameters certificate
The object from which to delete the attribute.
attributeType
The attribute to delete.
Remarks Most attributes are always present and can’t be deleted, in general only certificate
attributes are deletable.
See also cryptGetAttribute, cryptGetAttributeString, cryptSetAttribute,
cryptSetAttributeString.
cryptDeleteCertExtension
The cryptDeleteCertExtension function is used to delete a generic blob-type
certificate extension from a certificate object.
int cryptDeleteCertExtension( const CRYPT_CERTIFICATE certificate, const char *oid );
Parameters certificate
The certificate object from which to delete the extension.
oid
The object identifier value for the extension being deleted, specified as a sequence
of integers.
Remarks cryptlib directly supports extensions from X.509, PKIX, SET, SigG, and various
vendors itself, so you shouldn’t use this function for anything other than unknown,
proprietary extensions.
See also cryptAddCertExtension, cryptGetCertExtension.
352 Function Reference
cryptDeleteKey
The cryptDeleteKey function is used to delete a key or certificate from a keyset or
device. The key to delete is identified either through the key owner’s name or their
email address.
int cryptDeleteKey( const CRYPT_HANDLE cryptObject, const CRYPT_KEYID_TYPE
keyIDtype, const void *keyID );
Parameters cryptObject
The keyset or device object from which to delete the key.
keyIDtype
The type of the key ID, either CRYPT_KEYID_NAME for the name or key label,
or CRYPT_KEYID_EMAIL for the email address.
keyID
The key ID of the key to delete.
See also cryptAddPrivateKey, cryptAddPublicKey, cryptGetPrivateKey,
cryptGetPublicKey.
cryptDestroyCert
The cryptDestroyCert function is used to destroy a certificate object after use. This
erases all keying and security information used by the object and frees up any
memory it uses.
int cryptDestroyCert( const CRYPT_CERTIFICATE cryptCert );
Parameters cryptCert
The certificate object to be destroyed.
See also cryptCreateCert.
cryptDestroyContext
The cryptDestroyContext function is used to destroy an encryption context after use.
This erases all keying and security information used by the context and frees up any
memory it uses.
int cryptDestroyContext( const CRYPT_CONTEXT cryptContext );
Parameters cryptContext
The encryption context to be destroyed.
See also cryptCreateContext, cryptDeviceCreateContext.
cryptDestroyEnvelope
The cryptDestroyEnvelope function is used to destroy an envelope after use. This
erases all keying and security information used by the envelope and frees up any
memory it uses.
int cryptDestroyEnvelope( const CRYPT_ENVELOPE cryptEnvelope );
Parameters cryptEnvelope
The envelope to be destroyed.
See also cryptCreateEnvelope.
cryptDestroyObject 353
cryptDestroyObject
The cryptDestroyObject function is used to destroy a cryptlib object after use. This
erases all security information used by the object, closes any open data sources, and
frees up any memory it uses.
int cryptDestroyObject( const CRYPT_HANDLE cryptObject );
Parameters cryptObject
The object to be destroyed.
Remarks This function is a generic form of the specialised functions that destroy/close specific
cryptlib object types such as encryption contexts and certificate and keyset objects.
In some cases it may not be possible to determine the exact type of an object (for
example the keyset access functions may return a key certificate object or only an
encryption context depending on the keyset type), cryptDestroyObject can be used
to destroy an object of an unknown type.
See also cryptDestroyContext, cryptDestroyCert, cryptDestroyEnvelope,
cryptDestroySession, cryptKeysetClose.
cryptDestroySession
The cryptDestroySession function is used to destroy a session object after use. This
close the link to the client or server, erases all keying and security information used
by the session, and frees up any memory it uses.
int cryptDestroySession( const CRYPT_SESSION cryptSession );
Parameters cryptSession
The session to be destroyed.
See also cryptCreateSession.
cryptDeviceClose
The cryptDeviceClose function is used to destroy a device object after use. This
closes the connection to the device and frees up any memory it uses.
int cryptDeviceClose( const CRYPT_DEVICE device );
Parameters device
The device object to be destroyed.
See also cryptDeviceOpen.
cryptDeviceCreateContext
The cryptDeviceCreateContext function is used to create an encryption context for a
given encryption algorithm via an encryption device.
int cryptDeviceCreateContext( const CRYPT_DEVICE cryptDevice, CRYPT_CONTEXT
*cryptContext, const CRYPT_ALGO_TYPE cryptAlgo );
Parameters cryptDevice
The device object used to create the encryption context.
cryptContext
The address of the encryption context to be created.
cryptAlgo
The encryption algorithm to be used in the context.
See also cryptCreateContext, cryptDestroyContext.
354 Function Reference
cryptDeviceOpen
The cryptDeviceOpen function is used to establish a connection to a crypto device
such as a crypto hardware accelerator or a PCMCIA card or smart card.
int cryptDeviceOpen( CRYPT_DEVICE *device, const CRYPT_USER cryptUser, const
CRYPT_DEVICE_TYPE deviceType, const char *name );
Parameters device
The address of the device object to be created.
cryptUser
The user who is to own the device object or CRYPT_UNUSED for the default,
normal user.
deviceType
The device type to be used.
name
The name of the device, or null if a name isn’t required.
See also cryptDeviceClose.
cryptDeviceQueryCapability
The cryptDeviceQueryCapability function is used to obtain information about the
characteristics of a particular encryption algorithm provided by an encryption device.
The information returned covers the algorithm’s key size, data block size, and other
algorithm-specific information.
int cryptDeviceQueryCapability( const CRYPT_DEVICE cryptDevice, const
CRYPT_ALGO_TYPE cryptAlgo, CRYPT_QUERY_INFO *cryptQueryInfo );
Parameters cryptDevice
The encryption device to be queried.
cryptAlgo
The encryption algorithm to be queried.
cryptQueryInfo
The address of a CRYPT_QUERY_INFO structure which is filled with the
information on the requested algorithm and mode, or null if this information isn’t
required.
Remarks Any fields in the CRYPT_QUERY_INFO structure that don’t apply to the algorithm
being queried are set to CRYPT_ERROR, null or zero as appropriate. To determine
whether an algorithm is available (without returning information on them), set the
query information pointer to null.
See also cryptQueryCapability.
cryptEncrypt
The cryptEncrypt function is used to encrypt or hash data.
int cryptEncrypt( const CRYPT_CONTEXT cryptContext, void *buffer, const int length );
Parameters cryptContext
The encryption context to use to encrypt or hash the data.
buffer
The address of the data to be encrypted or hashed.
length
The length in bytes of the data to be encrypted or hashed.
cryptEnd 355
Remarks Public-key encryption and signature algorithms have special data formatting
requirements that need to be taken into account when this function is called. You
shouldn’t use this function with these algorithm types, but instead should use the
higher-level functions cryptCreateSignature, cryptCheckSignature,
cryptExportKey, and cryptImportKey.
See also cryptDecrypt.
cryptEnd
The cryptEnd function is used to shut down cryptlib after use. This function should
be called after you have finished using cryptlib.
int cryptEnd( void );
Parameters None
See also cryptInit.
cryptExportCert
The cryptExportCert function is used to export an encoded signed public key
certificate, certification request, CRL, or other certificate-related item from a
certificate container object.
int cryptExportCert( void *certObject, const int certObjectMaxLength, int *certObjectLength, const
CRYPT_CERTFORMAT_TYPE certFormatType, const
CRYPT_CERTIFICATE certificate );
Parameters certObject
The address of a buffer to contain the encoded certificate.
certObjectMaxLength
The maximum size in bytes of the buffer to contain the exported certificate.
certObjectLength
The address of the exported certificate length.
certFormatType
The encoding format for the exported certificate object.
certificate
The address of the certificate object to be exported.
Remarks The certificate object needs to have all the required fields filled in and must then be
signed using cryptSignCert before it can be exported.
See also cryptImportCert.
cryptExportKey
The cryptExportKey function is used to share a session key between two parties by
either exporting a session key from a context in a secure manner or by establishing a
new shared key. The exported/shared key is placed in a buffer in a portable format
that allows it to be imported back into a context using cryptImportKey.
If an existing session key is to be shared, it can be exported using either a public key
or key certificate or a conventional encryption key. If a new session key is to be
established, it can be done using a Diffie-Hellman encryption context.
int cryptExportKey( void *encryptedKey, const int encryptedKeyMaxLength, int
*encryptedKeyLength, const CRYPT_HANDLE exportKey, const
CRYPT_CONTEXT sessionKeyContext );
Parameters encryptedKey
The address of a buffer to contain the exported key. If you set this parameter to
356 Function Reference
cryptExportKeyEx
The cryptExportKeyEx function is used to share a session key between two parties
by either exporting a session key from a context in a secure manner or by establishing
a new shared key, with extended control over the exported key format. The
exported/shared key is placed in a buffer in a portable format that allows it to be
imported back into a context using cryptImportKey.
If an existing session key is to be shared, it can be exported using either a public key
or key certificate or a conventional encryption key. If a new session key is to be
established, it can be done using a Diffie-Hellman encryption context.
int cryptExportKeyEx( void *encryptedKey, const int encryptedKeyMaxLength, int
*encryptedKeyLength, const CRYPT_FORMAT_TYPE formatType, const
CRYPT_HANDLE exportKey, const CRYPT_CONTEXT sessionKeyContext );
Parameters encryptedKey
The address of a buffer to contain the exported key. If you set this parameter to
null, cryptExportKeyEx will return the length of the exported key in
encryptedKeyLength without actually exporting the key.
encryptedKeyMaxLength
The maximum size in bytes of the buffer to contain the exported key.
encryptedKeyLength
The address of the exported key length.
formatType
The format for the exported key.
exportKey
A public-key or conventional encryption context or key certificate object containing
the public or conventional key used to export the session key.
sessionKeyContext
An encryption context containing the session key to export (if the key is to be
shared) or an empty context with no key loaded (if the key is to be established).
Remarks A session key can be shared in one of two ways, either by one party exporting an
existing key and the other party importing it, or by both parties agreeing on a key to
use. The export/import process requires an existing session key and a public/private
cryptFlushData 357
cryptFlushData
The cryptFlushData function is used to flush data through an envelope or session
object, completing processing and (for session objects) sending the data to the remote
client or server.
int cryptFlushData( const CRYPT_HANDLE cryptHandle );
Parameters cryptHandle
The envelope or session object to flush the data through.
See also cryptPopData, cryptPushData.
cryptGenerateKey
The cryptGenerateKey function is used to generate a new key into an encryption
context.
int cryptGenerateKey( const CRYPT_CONTEXT cryptContext );
Parameters cryptContext
The encryption context into which the key is to be generated.
Remarks Hash contexts don’t require keys, so an attempt to generate a key into a hash context
will return CRYPT_ERROR_NOTAVAIL.
cryptGenerateKey will generate a key of a length appropriate for the algorithm
being used into an encryption context. If you want to specify the generation of a key
of a particular length, you should set the CRYPT_CTXINFO_KEYSIZE attribute
before calling this function.
cryptGetAttribute
The cryptGetAttribute function is used to obtain a boolean or numeric value, status
information, or object from a cryptlib object.
int cryptGetAttribute( const CRYPT_HANDLE cryptObject, const CRYPT_ATTRIBUTE_TYPE
attributeType, int *value );
Parameters cryptObject
The object from which to read the boolean or numeric value, status information, or
object.
attributeType
The attribute which is being read.
value
The boolean or numeric value, status information, or object.
See also cryptDeleteAttribute, cryptGetAttributeString, cryptSetAttribute,
cryptSetAttributeString.
cryptGetAttributeString
The cryptGetAttributeString function is used to obtain text or binary strings or time
values from a cryptlib object.
int cryptGetAttributeString( const CRYPT_HANDLE cryptObject, const
CRYPT_ATTRIBUTE_TYPE attributeType, void *value, int *valueLength );
358 Function Reference
Parameters cryptObject
The object from which to read the text or binary string or time value.
attributeType
The attribute which is being read.
value
The address of a buffer to contain the data. If you set this parameter to null,
cryptGetAttributeString will return the length of the data in attributeLength
without returning the data itself.
valueLength
The length of the data in bytes.
See also cryptDeleteAttribute, cryptGetAttribute, cryptSetAttribute,
cryptSetAttributeString.
cryptGetCertExtension
The cryptGetCertExtension function is used to obtain a generic blob-type certificate
extension from a certificate object or public or private key with an attached
certificate.
int cryptGetCertExtension( const CRYPT_CERTIFICATE certificate, const char *oid, int
*criticalFlag, void *extension, const int extensionMaxLength, int
*extensionLength );
Parameters cryptObject
The certificate or public/private key object from which to read the extension.
oid
The object identifier value for the extension being queried, specified as a sequence
of integers.
criticalFlag
The critical flag for the extension being read.
extension
The address of a buffer to contain the data. If you set this parameter to null,
cryptGetCertExtension will return the length of the data in extensionLength
without returning the data itself.
extensionMaxLength
The maximum size in bytes of the buffer to contain the extension data.
extensionLength
The length in bytes of the extension data.
Remarks cryptlib directly supports extensions from X.509, PKIX, SET, SigG, and various
vendors itself, so you shouldn’t use this function for anything other than unknown,
proprietary extensions.
See also cryptAddCertExtension, cryptDeleteCertExtension.
cryptGetPrivateKey
The cryptGetPrivateKey function is used to create an encryption context from a
private key in a keyset or crypto device. The private key is identified either through
the key owner’s name or their email address.
int cryptGetPrivateKey( const CRYPT_HANDLE cryptHandle, CRYPT_CONTEXT
*cryptContext, const CRYPT_KEYID_TYPE keyIDtype, const void *keyID,
const char *password );
Parameters cryptHandle
The keyset or device from which to obtain the key.
cryptGetPublicKey 359
cryptContext
The address of the context to be fetched.
keyIDtype
The type of the key ID, either CRYPT_KEYID_NAME for the name or key label,
or CRYPT_KEYID_EMAIL for the email address.
keyID
The key ID of the key to read.
password
The password required to decrypt the private key, or null if no password is required.
Remarks cryptGetPrivateKey will return CRYPT_ERROR_WRONGKEY if an incorrect
password is supplied. This can be used to determine whether a password is necessary
by first calling the function with a null password and then retrying the read with a
user-supplied password if the first call returns with CRYPT_ERROR_WRONGKEY.
See also cryptAddPrivateKey, cryptAddPublicKey, cryptDeleteKey, cryptGetPublicKey.
cryptGetPublicKey
The cryptGetPublicKey function is used to create an encryption context from a
public key in a keyset or crypto device. The public key is identified either through
the key owner’s name or their email address.
int cryptGetPublicKey( const CRYPT_HANDLE cryptObject, CRYPT_HANDLE *publicKey,
const CRYPT_KEYID_TYPE keyIDtype, const void *keyID );
Parameters cryptObject
The keyset or device from which to obtain the key.
publicKey
The address of the context or certificate to be fetched.
keyIDtype
The type of the key ID, either CRYPT_KEYID_NAME for the name or key label,
or CRYPT_KEYID_EMAIL for the email address.
keyID
The key ID of the key to read.
Remarks The type of object in which the key is returned depends on the keyset or device from
which it is being read. Most sources will provide a key certificate object, but some
will return only an encryption context containing the key. Both types of object can be
used with cryptlib functions.
See also cryptAddPrivateKey, cryptAddPublicKey, cryptDeleteKey,
cryptGetPrivateKey.
cryptImportCert
The cryptImportCert function is used to import an encoded certificate, certification
request, CRL, or other certificate-related item into a certificate container object.
int cryptImportCert( const void *certObject, const int certObjectLength, const CRYPT_USER
cryptUser, CRYPT_CERTIFICATE *certificate );
Parameters certObject
The address of a buffer that contains the encoded certificate.
certObjectLength
The encoded certificate length.
cryptUser
The user who is to own the imported object or CRYPT_UNUSED for the default,
normal user.
360 Function Reference
certificate
The certificate object to be created using the imported certificate data.
See also cryptExportCert.
cryptImportKey
The cryptImportKey function is used to share a session key between two parties by
importing an encrypted session key that was previously exported with
cryptExportKey into an encryption context.
If an existing session key being shared, it can be imported using either a private key
or a conventional encryption key. If a new session key is being established, it can be
done using a Diffie-Hellman encryption context.
int cryptImportKey( const void *encryptedKey, const int encryptedKeyLength, const
CRYPT_CONTEXT importContext, const CRYPT_CONTEXT
sessionKeyContext );
Parameters encryptedKey
The address of a buffer that contains the exported key created by cryptExportKey.
encryptedKeyLength
The length in bytes of the encrypted key data.
importContext
A public-key or conventional encryption context containing the private or
conventional key required to import the session key.
sessionKeyContext
The context used to contain the imported session key.
Remarks A session key can be shared in one of two ways, either by one party exporting an
existing key and the other party importing it, or by both parties agreeing on a key to
use. The export/import process requires an existing session key and a public/private
or conventional encryption context or key certificate object to export/import it with.
The key agreement process requires a Diffie-Hellman context and an empty session
key context (with no key loaded) that the new shared session key is generated into.
See also cryptExportKey, cryptExportKeyEx, cryptImportKey, cryptQueryObject.
cryptInit
The cryptInit function is used to initialise cryptlib before use. This function should
be called before any other cryptlib function is called.
int cryptInit( void );
Parameters None
See also cryptEnd.
cryptKeysetClose
The cryptKeysetClose function is used to destroy a keyset object after use. This
closes the connection to the key collection or keyset and frees up any memory it uses.
int cryptKeysetClose( const CRYPT_KEYSET keyset );
Parameters keyset
The keyset object to be destroyed.
See also cryptKeysetOpen.
cryptKeysetOpen 361
cryptKeysetOpen
The cryptKeysetOpen function is used to establish a connection to a key collection
or keyset.
int cryptKeysetOpen( CRYPT_KEYSET *keyset, const CRYPT_USER cryptUser, const
CRYPT_KEYSET_TYPE keysetType, const char *name, const
CRYPT_KEYOPT_TYPE options );
Parameters keyset
The address of the keyset object to be created.
cryptUser
The user who is to own the keyset object or CRYPT_UNUSED for the default,
normal user.
keysetType
The keyset type to be used.
name
The name of the keyset.
options
Option flags to apply when opening or accessing the keyset.
See also cryptKeysetClose.
cryptPopData
The cryptPopData function is used to remove data from an envelope or session
object.
int cryptPopData( const CRYPT_HANDLE envelope, void *buffer, const int length, int
*bytesCopied );
Parameters envelope
The envelope or session object from which to remove the data.
buffer
The address of the data to remove.
length
The length of the data to remove.
bytesCopied
The address of the number of bytes copied from the envelope.
See also cryptPushData.
cryptPushData
The cryptPushData function is used to add data to an envelope or session object.
int cryptPushData( const CRYPT_HANDLE envelope, const void *buffer, const int length, int
*bytesCopied );
Parameters envelope
The envelope or session object to which to add the data.
buffer
The address of the data to add.
length
The length of the data to add.
bytesCopied
The address of the number of bytes copied into the envelope.
362 Function Reference
cryptQueryCapability
The cryptQueryCapability function is used to obtain information about the
characteristics of a particular encryption algorithm. The information returned covers
the algorithm’s key size, data block size, and other algorithm-specific information.
int cryptQueryCapability( const CRYPT_ALGO_TYPE cryptAlgo, CRYPT_QUERY_INFO
*cryptQueryInfo );
Parameters cryptAlgo
The encryption algorithm to be queried.
cryptQueryInfo
The address of a CRYPT_QUERY_INFO structure which is filled with the
information on the requested algorithm and mode, or null if this information isn’t
required.
Remarks Any fields in the CRYPT_QUERY_INFO structure that don’t apply to the algorithm
being queried are set to CRYPT_ERROR, null or zero as appropriate. To determine
whether an algorithm is available (without returning information on it), set the query
information pointer to null.
See also cryptDeviceQueryCapability.
cryptQueryObject
The cryptQueryObject function is used to obtain information about an exported key
object created with cryptExportKey or a signature object created with
cryptCreateSignature. It returns information such as the type and algorithms used
by the object.
int cryptQueryObject( const void *objectData, const int objectDataLength,
CRYPT_OBJECT_INFO *cryptObjectInfo );
Parameters objectData
The address of a buffer that contains the object created by cryptExportKey or
cryptCreateSignature.
objectDataLength
The length in bytes of the object data.
cryptObjectInfo
The address of a CRYPT_OBJECT_INFO structure that contains information on
the exported key or signature.
Remarks Any fields in the CRYPT_OBJECT_INFO structure that don’t apply to the object
being queried are set to CRYPT_ERROR, null or zero as appropriate.
See also cryptCheckSignature, cryptCreateSignature, cryptExportKey, cryptImportKey.
cryptSetAttribute
The cryptSetAttribute function is used to add boolean or numeric information,
command codes, and objects to a cryptlib object.
int cryptSetAttribute( const CRYPT_HANDLE cryptObject, const CRYPT_ATTRIBUTE_TYPE
attributeType, const int value );
Parameters cryptObject
The object to which to add the value.
attributeType
The attribute which is being added.
cryptSetAttributeString 363
value
The boolean or numeric value, command code, or object which is being added.
See also cryptDeleteAttribute, cryptGetAttribute, cryptGetAttributeString,
cryptSetAttributeString.
cryptSetAttributeString
The cryptSetAttributeString function is used to add text or binary strings or time
values to an object.
int cryptSetAttributeString( const CRYPT_HANDLE cryptObject, const
CRYPT_ATTRIBUTE_TYPE attributeType, const void *value, const int
valueLength );
Parameters cryptObject
The object to which to add the text or binary string or time value.
attributeType
The attribute which is being added.
value
The address of the data being added.
valueLength
The length in bytes of the data being added.
See also cryptDeleteAttribute, cryptGetAttribute, cryptGetAttributeString,
cryptSetAttribute.
cryptSignCert
The cryptSignCert function is used to digitally sign a public key certificate, CA
certificate, certification request, CRL, or other certificate-related item held in a
certificate container object.
int cryptSignCert( const CRYPT_CERTIFICATE certificate, const CRYPT_CONTEXT
signContext );
Parameters certificate
The certificate container object that contains the certificate item to sign.
signContext
A public-key encryption or signature context containing the private key used to sign
the certificate.
Remarks Once a certificate item has been signed, it can no longer be modified or updated using
the usual certificate manipulation functions. If you want to add further data to the
certificate item, you have to start again with a new certificate object.
See also cryptCheckCert.
364 Acknowledgements
Acknowledgements
Alexey Kirichenko provided information on NtQuerySystemInfo for randomness-
gathering under WinNT/Win2K to avoid the need to access the buggy Windows
registry performance counters.
Brian Gladman wrote the AES code.
Chris Wedgwood and Paul Kendall helped write the Unix random data gathering
routines.
endergone Zwiebeltüte helped debug the SSL/TLS implementation.
Eric Young and the OpenSSL team wrote portions of the conventional encryption and
hashing code and bignum library.
Gary Nebbett helped diagnose a problem with Windows NPS.
Jean-Loup Gailly and Mark Adler wrote the zlib compression code.
Joerg Plate did the Amiga port.
Markus F.X.J. Oberhumer did the 32-bit DOS port.
Matt Thomlinson and Blake Coverett helped fix up and debug the Win32 random
data gathering routines.
Matthijs van Duin, Sascha Kratky, and Jeff Lamarche did the Macintosh Classic port.
Nathan Hammond did the MVS port.
Osma Ahvenlampi did the PPC BeOS port.
Sami Tolvanen implemented the cryptlib GUI interface.
Sriram Ramachandran did the Cygwin port.
Steve Landers provided the Tcl bindings, with financial support from Eolas
Technologies.
Stuart Woolford and Mario Korva did the OS/2 port.
Thomas Pornin did the ECDSA and ECDH code.
Trevor Perrin did the C#, Java, and Python bindings.
Wolfgang Gothier did the Delphi and Visual Basic bindings and tracked down a
number of really obscure probl^H^H^H^H^Hundocumented features.