TITLE OF THE ACTIVITY BASIC INCIDENT COMMAND SYSTEM TRAINING

(BICS)

ACTIVITY DATE September 23-25, 2024

ACTIVITY VENUE Balanghai Hotel and Convention Center Annex,

Butuan City

AFTER ACTIVITY REPORT

I. BACKGROUND

Following the enactment of Republic Act (RA) 10121, otherwise known as the
Philippine Disaster Risk Reduction and Management (DRRM) Law, on 27 May 2010,
the Philippine government took a proactive approach to manage the disaster
consequences and reduce disaster risks by institutionalizing various mechanisms.
Among these is the Incident Command System (ICS).

Incident Command System (ICS) is one of the flagship programs of the Office of Civil
Defense (OCD). As provided for in RA 10121, the NDRRMC Memorandum Circular
No. 4 s 2Ol2 and, the Executive Order No. 82 s 2012, ICS has been institutionalized
as an on-scene disaster response tool of the Philippine DRRM System. ICS is a
standard, on-scene, all-hazard incident management concept introduced by the US
Forest Service that can be used by all DRRM Councils, emergency management and
response agencies. It is a disaster response tool that coordinates the actions of all
response groups.

ICS has been proven effective in managing potential and actual disaster
consequences. It has significantly enhanced the mechanisms for resource
management, reporting and documentation, promotion of responder safety, and
optimum achievement of response objectives as evident in past major disaster
response operations to include management of planned high-density population
gatherings.

During response operations, it has been known that the PNP-PPO has always been
the partner of the province during response operations and activation of EOC and
IMT of which most are untrained of the basic principle of Incident Basic Incident
Command System (BICS) for PNP-PPO Management. Thus, this August, members
of the PNP-PPO forces will be trained with the Basic ICS Course in order to develop
better appreciation and understanding of ICS.
II. OBJECTIVES

General Objective
At the end of the training, the participants were able to acquire information, abilities,
and mindset necessary for applying the fundamental ideas and ICS principles in any
disaster situation.

Specific Objectives
Upon completion of the training, the participants were able to:
1. Explain the concept of ICS, its background, overview, principles and features;
2. Describe the ICS organization;
3. Determine the ICS facilities;
4. Learn how to manage planned events and major incidents;
5. Explain the principle of management by objectives;
6. Determine the essentials in managing resources in ICS;
7. Understand the considerations for incident and event planning; and
8. Discuss the use of transfer of command, demobilization and close-out.

III. PROFILE

These are the following profile of the participants and facilitators of training, to wit:

A. Training Role of all Attendees

TRAINING ROLE TOTAL PERCENTAGE

ATTENDEES
Trainer/Facilitator 6 8.8%
Participants 41 85.3%
Secretariat/guest 3 5.9%
Guests/Others 0 0%
Total 50 100%

B. Office/Agency of Participants

OFFICE/ AGENCY/ TOTAL

INSTITUTION ATTENDEES PERCENTAGE
PSWDO 1 2.4%
DSWD 4 9.8%
CSU 14 34.2%
BFP 3 7.3%
PBO 1 2.4%
PTO 1 2.4%
PAO 1 2.4%
23IB 1 2.4%
29IB 1 2.4%
DPWH – ADN 3 7.3%
PVET 1 2.4%
PSSG 4 9.8%
PDRRMO 2 5%
DICT 2 5%
PNP 1 2.4%
PEO 1 2.4%
Total 41 100%
 C. Sex of Participants

SEX TOTAL PERCENTAGE

ATTENDEES
Male 30 73.2%
Female 11 26.8%
Total 41 100%

D. Address of Participants

ADDRESS TOTAL PERCENTAGE

ATTENDEES
BUTUAN CITY 29 70.7%
CABADBARAN CITY 3 7.3%
SIBAGAT, ADS 1 2.4%
SAN FRANCISCO, ADS 1 2.4%
BUENAVISTA A.D.N 4 9.8%
TUBAY A.D.N 1 2.4%
SANTIAGO A.D.N 2 5%
Total 41 100%

E. Successful Participants/Completer

STATUS OF COMPLETION TOTAL PERCENTAGE

ATTENDEES
Completers 41 100%
Non-completers 0 0%
Total 41 100%

F. Confirmation Status of Participants

STATUS OF CONFIRMED TOTAL PERCENTAGE

PARTICIPANTS ATTENDEES
Confirmed Participants 41 100%
Actual Participants 41 100%
Difference 0 0

IV. STRATEGIES / COMPONENTS

The facilitators used the following methodologies in imparting their knowledge and
skills:

1. Lecture and Discussion

2. Tabletop Activities
3. Audiovisual Presentation
4. Demonstration and Return Demonstration
5. Pre-Test and Post-Test
6. Activity Feedback
V. MODULE DESCRIPTIONS

MODULES DESCRIPTIONS
Module 1: Introduction to ICS This module is an introduction to the
concept of ICS, highlighting its
background and development as well as
the key features and principles.
Module 2: ICS Organization and This module presents the composition of
Staffing the ICS organization and the roles and
responsibilities of the members of the
Incident Management Team.
Module 3: ICS Facilities This module emphasizes the basic ICS
facilities, their uses and map symbols.
Module 4: Managing Planned Events This module underscores the
and Incidents considerations for managing planned
events and major incidents using a
number of incident management options.
Module 5: Incident / Event Assessment This module highlights the process for
and Management by Objectives assessing the situation and coming up
with set of actions using the principle of
management by objectives.
Module 6: Organizing and Managing This module is about the different
Resources standards and approaches used in ICS
when it comes to resource management.
Module 7: Incident and Event Planning This module presents the step-by-step
process for planning as a cornerstone of
ICS. Further, it introduces the incident
action plan as a document that
enumerates tactical actions for response.
Module 8: Transfer of Command, This module provides an overview of the
Demobilization and Closeout transfer of command, demobilization, and
closeout as among the key activities
when terminating an ICS operation.

VI. ACTIVITY FLOW

DAY 1

TIME PARTICULARS
0800H - 0830H Registration Secretariat
0830H - 0930H Opening Program Secretariat
0930H - 0945H AM Break
0945H - 1030H Course Overview Gracia B. Espere
1030H - 1200H Module 1: Introduction to ICS Mark July Yup
1200H - 1300H Lunch Break
1300H - 1400H Module 1: Introduction to ICS (cont.)
1400H - 1500H Module 2: ICS Organization and Staffing Gracia B. Espere
1500H - 1515H PM Break
1515H - 1745H Module 2: ICS Organization and Staffing
 (cont.)
Activity Exercises
1745H -1915H Module 3: ICS Facilities Jorge Vincent G.
Pagaran
1915H - 1930H Daily Evaluation Alert Group

DAY 2

TIME PARTICULARS REQUIREMENTS

0800H - 0830H Day 1 Recap Alert Group
0830H - 0930H AM Break
0930H - 1200H Module 4: Organizing ICS and Managing Lorna C. Bayer
Incidents and Events
Activity Exercises
1200H - 1300H Lunch Break
1300H - 1430H Module 5: Incident/Event Assessment Gracia B. Espere
and Management by Objectives

1430H - 1445H PM Break

1445H - 1715H Module 6: Organizing and Managing Lorna C. Bayer
Resources

1715H - 1730H Daily Evaluation Alert Group

DAY 3

TIME PARTICULARS REQUIREMENTS

0800H - 0830H Day 2 Recap Alert Group
0830H - 1000H Module 7: Incident and Event Planning Erma R. Suyo
Formulation of Incident Action Plan and All Instructors
1000H - 1200H Preparation for Operational Briefing
Activity Exercises
1200H - 1300H Lunch Break
Return Demonstration – Operational All Instructors
1300H - 1400H Period Briefing
1300H - 1500H Module 8: Transfer of Command, Mark July Yup
Demobilization and Close Out
1500H - 1515H PM Break
Post Exam and Overall Training Training Course
1515H - 1530H Evaluation Monitor
1530H - 1600H Closing Program Alert Group
1600H End of Training
VII. HIGHLIGHTS

Day 1 (September 23, 2024)

 The Opening Ceremony was honored by the presence of Mr. Jorge Vincent G.
Pagaran, LDRRMO IV and Chief of the Capacity Building and Training Division.
His engaging address set a positive tone for the event, emphasizing the
importance of skill development and preparedness in emergency response.
 He was joined by a dedicated team of co-training instructors, including Gracia B.
Espere, Erma R. Suyo, Lorna C. Bayer, and Mark July Yap, all of whom brought
their expertise and passion for training to the forefront. Each instructor shared
their insights and commitment to equipping participants with the necessary skills
to handle various emergency situations effectively.
 Together, they created an inspiring atmosphere that underscored the significance
of collaboration and knowledge-sharing in building a resilient community. The
ceremony marked not just the beginning of the training program, but also the
establishment of a supportive learning environment where participants would
gain practical skills and confidence for real-world applications.
 The Pre-test was administered to the participants to assess their level of
familiarity and comprehension with the course material prior to the official
commencement of the training. This initial evaluation served as a crucial
benchmark, allowing both participants and instructors to identify existing
knowledge gaps and areas that required further emphasis.
 By completing the Pre-test, participants had the opportunity to reflect on their
understanding of key concepts and skills relevant to the course, fostering a sense
of self-awareness about their learning journey. The results of the Pre-test
enabled instructors to tailor the training program to better meet the specific needs
of the participants, ensuring a more effective and engaging learning experience.
Overall, this assessment not only set the stage for the training but also motivated
participants to actively engage in the upcoming sessions with a clear focus on
their personal development and growth.
 Ms. Gracia B. Espere presented a comprehensive overview of the course, laying
a solid foundation for the participants' learning experience. Following her
introduction, both instructors and participants took a moment to introduce
themselves to the class, fostering a sense of community and connection among
all attendees.
 Ms. Espere then guided the participants through essential logistics, outlining the
ground rules, daily schedule, and teaching techniques that would be employed
throughout the course. She also introduced the participant workbook, which
would serve as a vital resource for the training, enhancing the learning process.
 To further engage the participants, Ms. Espere initiated an expectation-setting
activity. This allowed participants to discuss their hopes and objectives for the
course with one another, creating an interactive environment where their voices
were heard. This discussion not only encouraged open communication but also
provided valuable insights for the instructors regarding their teaching strategies.
 Module 1, titled "Introduction to Incident Command System (ICS)," was expertly
delivered by Mr. July Yap. In this foundational module, she highlighted the core
concepts, key features, and significant lessons learned from past incidents that
prompted the development of the ICS framework. Mr. Yap emphasized the
importance of understanding these historical events to appreciate the
effectiveness of the system in managing emergencies.
 The module included insightful discussions on real-world examples where ICS
has been successfully implemented, showcasing its effectiveness in coordinating
response efforts during various emergencies. These case studies illustrated how
 ICS principles can streamline communication, enhance teamwork, and improve
decision-making in high-pressure situations.
 By the end of the module, participants gained a comprehensive understanding of
the ICS structure and its practical applications, empowering them to recognize its
relevance in their roles and the broader context of emergency management. Mr.
Yap engaging presentation fostered an interactive learning environment,
encouraging participants to think critically about the impact of ICS in real-world
scenarios.
 Module 2, titled "ICS Organization and Staffing," was delivered by Ms. Gracia B.
Espere, who provided an insightful overview of the Incident Command System's
organizational structure. She meticulously explained the various roles and
responsibilities within the ICS framework, including the Responsible Official,
Incident Commander, Command Staff, and General Staff.
 Ms. Espere elaborated on the critical functions of each position, clarifying how
they contribute to the overall effectiveness of incident management. By outlining
the specific duties associated with each role, she emphasized the importance of
clear leadership and coordination during emergency response efforts.
 Also, she provided a detailed explanation of the information flow within the ICS
organization, illustrating how communication channels operate to ensure that
crucial information is relayed efficiently among all levels of command. This
understanding is essential for maintaining situational awareness and fostering
collaboration among team members.
 Through engaging discussions and interactive elements, Ms. Bayer ensured that
participants grasped the significance of a well-defined ICS organization and the
pivotal roles that each member plays in managing incidents effectively. By the
conclusion of the module, participants were better equipped to navigate the
complexities of ICS staffing and organization in real-world scenarios.
 Module 3, titled "ICS Facilities," was delivered by Mr. Jorge Vincent G. Pagaran,
who provided a comprehensive overview of the various facilities utilized within
the Incident Command System. He elaborated on the essential functions of these
facilities, detailing how each one plays a critical role in supporting effective
incident management.
 Mr. Pagaran also introduced the appropriate map symbols used to represent
different ICS facilities, helping participants visualize and understand their
locations and purposes within an operational context. Her presentation included
practical examples and scenarios, which reinforced the importance of these
facilities in coordinating response efforts during emergencies.
 As the day concluded, participants engaged in module and daily course
evaluations facilitated by Group 1, who served as the host team. This feedback
session allowed participants to reflect on their learning experiences, share
insights, and suggest improvements, fostering a culture of continuous
improvement within the training program. Overall, the evaluations provided
valuable information that would enhance the effectiveness of future modules and
ensure that participants' needs were met throughout the course.

Day 2 (September 24, 2024)

 Group 2 served as the day's host team and conducted the opening ceremonies,
including prayer, summary, and energizer.
 Ms. Lorna C. Bayer delivered an insightful presentation on Module 4, titled
"Organizing ICS and Managing Incidents and Events." In this module, she
explored the various strategies available for effective incident management,
emphasizing the flexibility and adaptability of the Incident Command System
(ICS) in different contexts.
 Ms. Bayer provided a thorough explanation of how ICS can be employed to
manage both planned events, such as community festivals and public gatherings,
as well as unplanned emergencies like natural disasters and accidents. She
outlined the critical steps involved in organizing the ICS framework to ensure a
coordinated and efficient response, regardless of the nature of the incident.
 Through real-world examples and case studies, Ms. Bayer illustrated the
importance of pre-planning and preparation in successful incident management.
She highlighted key considerations such as resource allocation, communication,
and collaboration among various agencies and stakeholders.
 Her engaging delivery and interactive discussions encouraged participants to
think critically about the application of ICS in diverse scenarios, equipping them
with the knowledge and skills necessary to effectively organize and manage
incidents and events in their own communities. By the end of the module,
participants had a deeper understanding of how to implement ICS principles in
various contexts, reinforcing their readiness to tackle both planned and
unplanned challenges.
 Module 5, titled "Incident/Event Assessment and Management by Objectives,"
was expertly presented by Ms. Gracia B. Espere. In this module, she delved into
the crucial concept of management by objectives (MBO), highlighting its
significance in the context of incident and event management.
 Ms. Espere thoroughly explained the MBO method, outlining how it provides a
structured approach to setting clear, measurable objectives that guide the
response to incidents. She emphasized the importance of defining specific goals
to ensure that all team members are aligned and focused on achieving the
desired outcomes.
 Also, she provided a detailed procedure for assessing the complexity of incidents
or events. This included identifying various factors that contribute to an incident's
complexity, such as the scale of the event, the number of stakeholders involved,
and the resources required. Ms. Espere’s practical examples illustrated how to
evaluate these factors effectively, enabling participants to make informed
decisions and prioritize actions based on the situation at hand.
 Through interactive discussions and scenario-based exercises, participants were
encouraged to apply the principles of MBO to real-world situations, enhancing
their problem-solving skills and critical thinking. By the end of the module,
participants gained a comprehensive understanding of how to assess incidents
and events strategically, ensuring effective management and successful
outcomes.
 Module 6, titled "Organizing and Managing Resources," was delivered by Ms.
Lorna C. Bayer, who provided an in-depth exploration of the essential concepts
related to resource organization and allocation within the Incident Command
System (ICS). She outlined critical strategies for effectively managing resources,
emphasizing the importance of planning, prioritization, and adaptability in
dynamic situations.
 Ms. Bayer highlighted vital factors to consider when managing resources,
including the assessment of available assets, understanding team capabilities,
and ensuring clear communication among all stakeholders. She stressed the
significance of efficient resource management in enhancing operational
effectiveness during incidents.
 To reinforce the theoretical concepts, Ms. Bayer engaged participants in hands-
on practice using ICS Forms 215 and 215A. This practical exercise allowed
participants to apply their knowledge in real-time, helping them become familiar
with the documentation processes essential for resource management within the
ICS framework. Through this interactive approach, participants gained valuable
experience in organizing and tracking resources, enhancing their preparedness
for real-world applications.
 The day concluded with a thorough module and daily course evaluation,
facilitated by Group 2, who once again demonstrated their organizational skills as
 the host team. This evaluation provided participants with an opportunity to reflect
on their learning experiences, share feedback, and suggest improvements for
future sessions, contributing to a culture of continuous learning and collaboration.

Day 3 (September 25, 2024)

 Group 3 served as the morning session's host team, and they conducted the
opening ceremonies such as prayer, recap, and energizer.
 Module 7, titled "Incident and Event Planning," was presented by Ms. Erma R.
Suyo, who guided participants through the critical processes involved in effective
planning before the formulation of an Incident Action Plan (IAP). She emphasized
the importance of thorough planning in ensuring a successful response to both
anticipated events and unforeseen incidents.
 Ms. Suyo detailed the essential steps in the planning process, including
conducting a comprehensive situational assessment, identifying objectives, and
determining resource needs. She highlighted the need for collaboration among
team members and stakeholders to develop a shared understanding of the goals
and expectations for the incident response.
 As part of the module, Ms. Suyo introduced participants to the components of the
Incident Action Plan, explaining how it serves as a roadmap for operational
activities. She outlined the key elements that should be included in the IAP, such
as objectives, strategies, and assigned responsibilities.
 Also, Ms. Suyo prepared participants for the operational briefing, a vital aspect of
implementing the IAP. She discussed best practices for delivering effective
briefings, ensuring that all team members are informed, engaged, and prepared
to execute their roles during the incident.
 Through interactive discussions and practical exercises, participants developed a
deeper understanding of the planning process, enhancing their ability to
formulate actionable plans that are critical for successful incident and event
management. By the end of the module, they were well-equipped to navigate the
complexities of planning and operational readiness in real-world scenarios.
 Before allowing any group to participate in the Operational Period Briefing Return
Demonstration, all instructors conducted a thorough review of the completed
Incident Action Plans (IAPs) for each group. This meticulous examination
ensured that each plan met the established criteria and addressed all necessary
components, including objectives, strategies, and assigned responsibilities.
 The instructors provided constructive feedback, highlighting strengths and
identifying areas for improvement, which further enriched the participants'
understanding of effective incident planning. This collaborative review process
encouraged groups to engage in discussions, allowing them to refine their IAPs
based on the insights gained from the instructors.
 By fostering an environment of open communication and teamwork, the
instructors ensured that each group was adequately prepared for the upcoming
demonstration. This preparation was essential for instilling confidence in the
participants as they transitioned into the operational briefing, where they would
present their plans and strategies to their peers and instructors.
 This careful validation of the IAPs not only enhanced the quality of the
operational briefings but also underscored the importance of thorough planning
and clear communication in the successful management of incidents and events.
The instructors' guidance played a crucial role in equipping participants with the
skills and knowledge needed to effectively execute their plans in real-world
situations.
 All five groups were provided ample time to refine their Incident Action Plans
(IAPs) and prepare for the Operational Period Briefing. This dedicated practice
session allowed participants to collaborate effectively, ensuring that they could
address any feedback received during the instructors' review.
 As each group practiced, they honed their presentation skills and clarified their
strategies, fostering a sense of confidence and readiness. The supportive
environment encouraged creativity and collaboration, with group members
actively contributing ideas and refining their delivery techniques.
 During the return demonstrations, each group showcased their IAPs with
enthusiasm and professionalism. Instructors closely observed their
performances, providing real-time feedback that highlighted strengths and offered
constructive suggestions for improvement. This interactive evaluation process not
only enhanced the learning experience but also reinforced the importance of
adaptability and communication in incident management.
 The successful execution of the return demonstrations demonstrated the
participants' understanding of the IAP formulation process and their readiness to
implement it in real-world scenarios. Overall, this engaging practice and feedback
session significantly contributed to the participants' confidence and competence
in conducting effective operational briefings.
 Module 8, titled "Transfer of Command, Demobilization, and Close Out," was
presented by Mr. Mark July Yap, who provided valuable insights into the critical
processes involved in transitioning command and effectively concluding an
incident response. He detailed the importance of a structured transfer of
command to ensure continuity and clarity in leadership during emergencies,
emphasizing the protocols that facilitate a seamless handover between incoming
and outgoing command personnel.
 Mr. Yap also discussed the demobilization process, highlighting the significance
of efficiently returning resources, personnel, and equipment to their original
status. He outlined best practices for documenting lessons learned and
conducting thorough close-out procedures, which are essential for evaluating the
response efforts and improving future operations.
 As the day concluded, participants engaged in a post-test designed to assess
their understanding of the material covered throughout the training. This was
followed by module evaluations and a comprehensive training evaluation
facilitated by Ms. Gracia B. Espere, who encouraged participants to reflect on
their experiences and provide feedback to enhance future training sessions.
 Group 5 proudly hosted the closing ceremony, which took place immediately after
the modules. This ceremonial event celebrated the participants’
accomplishments, fostering a sense of community and shared achievement. The
closing ceremony served as a fitting conclusion to the training program, as
participants received recognition for their hard work and commitment to
mastering the skills necessary for effective incident management. Overall, the
combination of reflection, feedback, and celebration ensured a meaningful wrap-
up to the training experience.
 The Course Monitor officially confirmed the recommendation for graduation to the
participants, recognizing their hard work and dedication throughout the training
program. This endorsement marked a significant milestone in their professional
development, highlighting their readiness to apply the skills and knowledge
acquired during the course in real-world scenarios.
 The training encompassed the delivery of essential services and effective
response strategies, equipping participants with the necessary tools to excel in
incident management. Participants demonstrated a deep understanding of the
course content and showcased their ability to implement critical concepts in
practical situations.
 The confirmation of graduation not only celebrated the participants' achievements
but also underscored the importance of the training in fostering a skilled and
prepared workforce capable of responding to emergencies and managing
incidents effectively. This accomplishment reflects the commitment of both the
participants and the instructors to maintaining high standards of preparedness
and service delivery in their respective fields.
 VIII. PHOTOS

Mr. Joerge Vincent G. Pagaran delivered the Module 3, titled ICS Facilities.

Ms. Lorna Bayer delivered the Module 6, titled Organizing and Managing Resources.
Mr. July Yap expertly delivered the module 1 titled "Introduction to Incident Command System
(ICS).

Ms. Erma R. Suyo presented the Module 7, titled "Incident and Event Planning.
Ms. Gracia B. Espere, delivered the Module 2, titled "ICS Organization and Staffing.

During their group activity on the ICS

Organizational Structure, the team engaged
in meaningful discussions and
collaboratively analyzed the roles and
responsibilities within the system, fostering a
deeper understanding of its functions.
During their group presentation on the
objectives of the Incident Management
Team (IMT), the participants delivered a
comprehensive overview, clearly outlining
key goals such as ensuring efficient
response coordination, resource
management, and effective
communication during emergency
situations.

During their review of ICS Forms 215 and

215A, the team meticulously evaluated
resource needs, assessed potential
safety hazards, and developed strategies
to ensure efficient operations while
prioritizing the safety of personnel and
the public.
The photos taken after their Operational
Briefing Presentation captured the team’s
sense of readiness and cohesion,
highlighting the camaraderie and
confidence gained through clear
communication of tactical objectives,
resource strategies, and safety protocols.
These images reflect the professionalism
and preparedness instilled during the
briefing.
The graduates of the Basic Incident Command System (ICS) Training Course, pictured
alongside the expert resource speakers, celebrate their achievement, having gained essential
skills in incident management and emergency response coordination.

IX. ISSUES AND CONCERNS

No more major issues/concern was raised.

X. WAYS FORWARD
The trained participants will look forward for the next training which is the Emergency
Operation Center Management Training.

XI. FEEDBACK
Using a rating scale of 1 to 5. A rating of ‘’1’’ indicates extremely disagree (ED), ‘’2’’
disagree (D), ‘’3’’ agree to some extent (ASE), “4” agree (A), and “5” strongly agree
(SA) shown in the tables (Table 1 to Table 3) below:

Table 1
Rating
Preparation for the Activity Interpretation
1 2 3 4 5
The Provincial Order/Office Memo/invitation
4.33 - VS
letter was provided on time
I was given enough information on
administrative matters pertaining to the
4.33 - VS
training (e.g. advisory, transportation,
accommodation etc.)

Table 2
During the Activity Rating
Interpretation
A. Content and Delivery 1 2 3 4 5
The objectives of the sessions/training were
4.93 - E
clearly defined and met
The topics covered were relevant and useful 4.87 - E
The training methodologies used were 4.80 - E
appropriate
There was sufficient opportunity for
4.60 – VS
interactive participation
The schedule for the training provided
sufficient time to cover all of the proposed 4.60 – VS
activities
The resource materials were available,
4.73 – VS
adequate and appropriate

Table 2.1
B. Resource Person/s and Facilitator/s Rating
Interpretation
GRACIA B. ESPERE 1 2 3 4 5
He/She is well-prepared and
4.93 - E
knowledgeable on the topics/sessions
He/She was able to draw and sustain
4.93- E
interest of the participants
He/She was able to address
questions/issues correctly and 4.93 - E
appropriately
He/She adequately utilized variety of
4.93 - E
training methods
He/She is appropriately dressed 4.93 - E

Table 2.2
B. Resource Person/s and Facilitator/s Rating
Interpretation
LORNA C. BAYER 1 2 3 4 5
He/She is well-prepared and knowledgeable
4.93- E
on the topics/sessions
He/She was able to draw and sustain
4.93 - E
interest of the participants
He/She was able to address
4.93- E
questions/issues correctly and appropriately
He/She adequately utilized variety of
4.93 - E
training methods
He/She is appropriately dressed 4.93 - E

Table 2.3
B. Resource Person/s and Facilitator/s Rating
Interpretation
ERMA R. SUYO 1 2 3 4 5
He/She is well-prepared and
4.87 - E
knowledgeable on the topics/sessions
He/She was able to draw and sustain
4.87 – E
interest of the participants
He/She was able to address
questions/issues correctly and 4.87 – E
appropriately
He/She adequately utilized variety of
4.87 – E
training methods
He/She is appropriately dressed 4.87 – E

Table 2.4
B. Resource Person/s and Facilitator/s Rating Interpretation
 JORGE VINCENT G. PAGARAN 1 2 3 4 5
He/She is well-prepared and
4.93 - E
knowledgeable on the topics/sessions
He/She was able to draw and sustain
4.93 - E
interest of the participants
He/She was able to address
questions/issues correctly and 4.93 - E
appropriately
He/She adequately utilized variety of
4.93 - E
training methods
He/She is appropriately dressed 4.93 - E

Table 2.5
B. Resource Person/s and Facilitator/s Rating
Interpretation
MARK JULY YAP 1 2 3 4 5
He/She is well-prepared and
4.93 - E
knowledgeable on the topics/sessions
He/She was able to draw and sustain
4.93 - E
interest of the participants
He/She was able to address
questions/issues correctly and 4.87 - E
appropriately
He/She adequately utilized variety of
4.93 - E
training methods
He/She is appropriately dressed 4.93 - E

Table 3
Rating
Interpretation
1 2 3 4 5
Function Room 4.80 – E
Food 4.73 – VS
Accommodation 4.87 – E
The staff provided quality service
5.00– E
(responsive to the needs of the clients)
Equipment /facilities 4.93 – E

The scoring and equivalent:

Excellent - 3.75 - 4.0; Very Satisfactory - 3.25 - 3.74; Satisfactory - 2.5 - 3.24; Poor 2:00
- 2.49 and Needs Improvement 1.99 and below.

Below is the scoring and equivalent of the Over-all Course Rating as shown in Table 3:
“E” – Excellent – 4.75 – 5.0; “VS” – Very Satisfactory – 4.25 – 4.74; “S” – Satisfactory –
3.50 – 4.24; “P” - Poor – 2.00 – 3.49; “NI” – Needs Improvement – 1.99 and below

Table 3
Score / Point
Over-all Course Rating Equivalent
NI F S VS E
(Preparation for the activity) Logistics
4.33 - VS
and Training Resources
(During the activity) Resource
4.70 - VS
Speakers/ Instructors and Facilitators
(During the activity) Course Content,
4.90 - E
Objectives and Learning Expectations
(During the activity) Classroom 4.90 - E
 Facilities, Food, Venue and Over all
Classroom Management
Over-all Course Rating 4.70 - VS

POST ACTIVITY

 What facilitated your learning?

 Exercises are useful in facilitating our learnings.
 The sufficient instructions.
 Presentations, manuals, personal experiences of instructors.
 Collaboration among groupmates and coordination with other participants.
 This training reinforce & help participants apply their knowledge in
practical settings & real-life scenario.
 The expertise of the speakers/facilitators.
 Co-participants active engagement and sharing of insight.

 What hinders your learning?

 Participative.
 The terms it’s confusing in every module, there should be terms provided.

 What are your recommendation?

 Hoping that on next training, the participants are provided with more
examples or especially in the preparation of the AIP.
 Continuous conduct of alike activities.
 To provide participants billeting considering the training is heavy.
 Provide ample time for exercises.

XII. ATTACHMENT

 Attendance
 Directory

Prepared by:

MARK JESSON A. ROJAS, LPT

LDRRMA
Staff, Training Division

Recommending Approval:

JORGE VINCENT G. PAGARAN, RN, MSN

LDRRMO IV
Chief, Training Division

Approved:
ERMA R. SUYO, RN, MCDRM
PGDH, PDRRMO

Noted by:

MA. ANGELICA ROSEDELL M. AMANTE

Governor