0% found this document useful (0 votes)
17 views5 pages

IntroCtrlSys - Final Exam - 2nd Semester - 2122 - Solution

Uploaded by

trichutich
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
17 views5 pages

IntroCtrlSys - Final Exam - 2nd Semester - 2122 - Solution

Uploaded by

trichutich
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 5

(Date) (Date)

Lecturer: Approved by:


(Signature & Fullname) (Signature, Position & Fullname)

(The above part must be hidden when copying for exam)

Semester/Academic year 2 2021-2022


FINAL EXAM Date 27/06/2022
Course title Introduction to Control Systems
UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY - VNUHCM Course ID 409401
FACULTY OF EEE Duration 100 mins. Question sheet code
Notes: - Students are allowed to use references, but not mobile phones and laptops

Problem 1: (2.0 points) Given the control system


R(s) Y(s)
+ GC(s) G(s)
100
G ( s) 
( s  4) 2

1.1 Calculate steady state error to unit step input and unit ramp input.
1.2 Calculate the POT and ts (2% criterion) of the closed-loop system.

Problem 2: (3.0 points) Given the control system


R(s) Y(s)
+ GC(s) G(s)
10( s  2)
G ( s) 
s ( s  3)( s  4)

Design the controller GC(s) such that the system after compensation has a pair of complex poles
with =0.8 and n=8.

Problem 3: (3.0 points) Given the control system


R(s) Y(s)
+ GC(s) G(s)
8( s  10)e 0.04 s
G ( s) 
s ( s  20)

Design the controller GC(s) such that the system after compensation has steady-state error to unit
ramp input ess*  0.05 and  *  600 .

Problem 4: (2.0 points) Given a system described by the state equation:


 x (t )  Ax(t )  Bu(t )

 y (t )  Cx(t )
é0 1ù 2
A= ê ú , B    , C = [1 0]
êë-3 -4úû 1 
4.1 Verify the the system is controllable.
4.2 Design the state feedback controller so that poles of the closed loop system are -3  j 3

Stu.ID: .......................................... Stu. Fullname: .............................................................................................................. Page 1/1


SOLUTION

Problem 1: (2.0 point)


1.1 (1.0 point)
Steady state error to unit step input:
100
K P  lim G ( s )  lim  6.25
s 0 s 0 ( s  4) 2

1 1
ess    0.1379
1  K P 1  6.25
Steady state error to unit step input:
100
KV  lim sG ( s )  lim s 0
s 0 s 0 ( s  4) 2

1 1
ess   
KV 0

1.2 (1.0 point)


The characteristic equation of the closed-loop system:
100
1  G (s)  1   s 2  8s  116  0
( s  4) 2
Poles of closed-loop system: p1,2  4  j10
Dominant poles: p1,2  4  j10  n  jn 1   2
n  4 n  10.77
   
n 1    10   0.37
2

Percentage of overshoot (POT):


  
POT  exp     100%  28.46%
 1 2 
 
Settling time (2%):
4 4
ts    1 (sec)
n 4

Problem 2: (3.0 point)

The controller to be designed is a phase lead compensator because the objective is to improve
transient response of the closed-loop sysem
s  1 / T
Gc ( s )  K c
s 1/ T

*
The desired dominant poles: s1,2  0.8  8  j8 1  0.82  6.4  4.8 j

The deficiency angle: *  180  G ( s1* )  72.50

Zero of the controller:


 OPx  *   143 72.5 
sin    sin   
1  2 2   2 2 
 OP  8  4.86
T  OPx  *   143 72.5 
sin    sin   
 2 2  2 2 

Pole of the controller


 OPx  *   143 72.5 
sin    sin   
1  2 2  2 2 
 OP  8  13.18
T  OPx  *   143 72.5 
sin    sin   
 2 2  2 2 
s  4.86
 GC (s)  KC
s  13.18
s  4.86 10( s  2)
GC ( s )G ( s ) s*  6.4  j 4.8  K C 1
1
s  13.18 s ( s  3)( s  4) s1*   6.4  j 4.8

 Determine KC : K C  0.1565  1
K C  6.39

s  4.86
 GC  s   6.39
s  13.18

Problem 3: (3 points)

The transfer function of the compensator to be designed:

Ts  1
GC ( s )  KC
Ts  1

- Velocity constant before compensation:

8( s  10)e0.04 s
KV  lim sG ( s )  lim sG ( s )  4
s 0 s 0 s( s  20)

- Desired velocity constant:

1 1
KV*  *
  20
ess 0.05

- The gain of the controller:

KV* 20
KC   5 (0.5p)
KV 4

40( s  10)e0.04 s
Denote: G1 ( s)  KC G ( s ) 
s( s  20)
The Bode diagram of G1 ( s ) :

Bode Diagram
30

20

System: G1
10 Frequency (rad/s): 36.2
Magnitude (dB): 0.0193
0

-10
0
System: G1
Frequency (rad/s): 36.2
-90
Phase (deg): -160

-180

-270

-360
10 0 10 1 10 2
Frequency (rad/s)

From the Bode diagram, we have:

C  36.2(rad / sec) (0.5p)

1 (C )  1600

M  1800  1 (C )  180  1600  200 (0.25p)

The maximum phase of the phase compensator:

max  M *  M    60  20  5  450 (0.25p)

1  sin max 1  sin 450


   5.83 (0.25p)
1  sin max 1  sin 450

The new gain crossover frequency:

L1 (C* )  10lg   10lg(2.46)  7.66dB

From the Bode diagram, we have

C*  95(rad / sec) (0.5p)

Calculate T:
1 1
T   0.0044 (0.25p)
 *
C  95 5.83

 T  5.83  0.0044  0.0257 (0.25p)

0.0257 s  1
Conclusion: The TF of the compensator is: GC ( s)  5 (0.25p)
0.0044s  1

Problem 4: (2.0 points)

3.1 The controllability matrix:

2 1 
C   B AB    
1 10 

det(C )  21  rank(C )  2  the system is controllable. (0.5 p)

3.2 Design the state feedback controller:

The closed-loop characteristic equation:

det(sI  A  BK )  0

 1 0   0 1   2  
 det  s         k1 k2    0
 0 1   3 4  1  

  s  2k1 1  2k2  
 det     0
  3  k1 s  4  k2  

 ( s  2k1 )( s  4  k2 )  (3  k1 )(1  2k2 )  0

 s 2  (2k1  k2  4) s  (9k1  6k2  3)  0 (1) (0.75 p)

The desired characteristic equation:

( s  3  j3)(s  3  j3)  0

 s 2  6s  18  0 (2) (0.25p)

Balancing (1) and (2) leads to:

2k1  k2  4  6

9k1  6k2  3  18

k1  1.2857
  (0.5p)
k2  0.5714

You might also like