Cbas 210 (1&2)

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 2

ASSIGNMENT1

1. Over the past decade, scientists have raised concerns about the lack of reproducibility
in certain scientific fields, posing a threat to the credibility and integrity of scientific
findings. A 2011 project aimed to replicate 100 psychology studies in three leading
journals, revealing that only 39% of the studies showed the same results as the original
experiments. This problem is not unique to psychology, as studies in cancer biology,
economics, and other fields have also failed to replicate previous findings. Potential
reasons for these failures include statistical issues, publication bias, and questionable
research practices. Brian Nosek, a psychologist at the University of Virginia, co-founded
the Center for Open Science, argues that perseverance in science is valued, and to
address the reproducibility crisis, some scientists are advocating for more transparency
and openness in research practices.

2. One important component of scientific study that is frequently misinterpreted and


misapplied is statistical significance. It is frequently understood to be a gauge of how
credible or believable a study finding is, yet this understanding is incorrect. The best way
to think of the p-value is as a gauge of how well the observed data and the null
hypothesis—that there is no effect or difference—compile. A binary interpretation of the
data is promoted by the current emphasis on statistical significance, which ignores the
crucial importance of effect sizes, confidence intervals, and other quantitative markers of
real-world relevance. Because it lacks solid theoretical or empirical support, the
conventional 0.05 threshold for statistical significance is problematic. When analyzing
and publishing statistical data, researchers should take a more thorough approach,
putting special emphasis on effect sizes, confidence intervals, and the accuracy of
estimates. Replicating results across multiple studies is essential for establishing the
credibility and generalizability of scientific claims. By moving away from an
overemphasis on statistical significance, the scientific community can improve the
reliability and reproducibility of research findings.

ASSIGNMENT 2

1.D
2.A
3.D
4. C
5. B
6. C
7. C
8. C
9. B
10. D
11.C
12.D
13. B
14. A
15. A
16. D
17. a. (Sheret, Sultana, & Sotir, 2016)
b. (Seven News, 1994)
c. (Yeo, Oh, Pyke, & McDonald, 1998)
d. (Turnbull and Shorten, 2003)
e. (Charman, 2007)
f. (Minogue, 1968; Lopez, 1971)
g. (Smith, 2009, p. 7)
h. (Dickinson, 2009a)
i. (Brown, n.d.)
j. (Copyright Act, 1968)
k. According to Sotir (2016), academic literacy is “critical for survival” at university.

18. a. Clegg, S. (2003). Managing organization futures in a changing world of power/knowledge.


In H. Tsoukas & C. Knud (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of organization theory (pp. 536-567).
Oxford University Press.

b. Irvine, J. (2005, July 27). Commodity boom is over: Access. Sydney Morning Herald,
p.19.

c. Kim, A.J. (2002). Community building on the web. Safari Tech Books.
http://proquest.safaribooksonline.com/0201874849.

You might also like