New Ideas in Recognition of Cancer and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph With Star and Wheel by Diamond Search Edge

Dr. Henry Garrett ◦ Independent Researcher ◦ Department of Mathematics ◦ DrHenryGarrett@gmail.
com ◦ Manhattan, NY,

USA
New Ideas In Recognition of Cancer And Neutrosophic 2
SuperHyperGraph With Star and Wheel By Diamond search 3
Edge 4
Dr. Henry Garrett ◦ Independent Researcher ◦ Department of Mathematics ◦ 6
[email protected] ◦ Manhattan, NY, USA 7
1 SYNOPSIS 8
In this scientific research, (Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic 9
SuperHyperDiamond search Edge). Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (SHG) S be a pair 10
S = (V, E). Consider a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet As = {E1 , E2 , . . . , Es }. Then As is 11
called Neutrosophic SuperHyperDiamond search Edge if the following expressions, terms and 12
statements is called Neutrosophic SuperHyperDiamond search Edge criteria holds. 13
X X X
|( T (Ei ), I(Ei ), F (Ei ))|
Ei ∈As Ei ∈As Ei ∈As
X X X
= max |{ ( T (Ei ), I(Ei ), F (Ei )) |
Bs ⊆EN SHG
Ei ∈Bs Ei ∈Bs Ei ∈Bs
∀Ei , Ej , Ek , El ∈ Bs :
Va ∈ Ei , Ej & Vb ∈ Ej , Ek & Vc ∈ Ek , El ⇒ Vd ∈ Ek , El
}|.
In this scientific research, new configurations are introduced for the new 14
SuperHyperNotions, namely a Strongly Diamond search Edge and a Neutrosophic 15
Strongly Diamond search Edge. Two different SuperHyperDefinitions were started for 16
them, but research has progressed and SuperHyperNotion, SuperHyperUniform, and 17
SuperHyperClass are well-defined and well-reviewed based on them. Literature review is 18
implemented throughout this research. To shine the light and importance of this 19
research, a comparison between this SuperHyperNotion with other SuperHyperNotions 20
and basic SuperHyperNumbers is presented. Definitions are followed by examples and 21
examples, so clarifications are guided by various tools. Applications are designed to 22
understand the theoretical aspect of this ongoing research. “Cancer diagnosis” are the 23
things that are being researched to explore the challenges that make sense in ongoing 24
research and future research. It is a special case. Cells are viewed in the intended 25
manner. There are different types of them. Some are individual and some are well 26
modeled by groups of cells. All these types are officially called “SuperHyperVertex”, but 27
the relationships between them all are officially called “SuperHyperEdge”. 28
“SuperHyperGraph” and “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph” frameworks are selected and 29
selected for research on “Cancer Diagnosis”. Thus, these complex and dense 30
super-hypermodels open avenues for research on theoretical aspects and “cancer 31
diagnosis”. Ways to pursue this scientific research have been considered. It has also 32
been formally collected in the form of several questions and problems. It is useful to 33
define a “neutrosophic” version of Strongly Diamond search Edge. Since there are more 34
ways to get type results a Strongly Diamond search Edge becomes more understandable. 35
In order to master the Neutrosophic Strongly Diamond search Edge, there is a need to 36
“re-define” the concept of “Strongly Diamond search Edge mastery”. 37
Dr. Henry Garrett ◦ Independent Researcher ◦ Department of Mathematics ◦ [email protected] ◦ Manhattan, NY,
USA
USA
SuperHyperVertices and SuperHyperEdges are assigned by alphabetical labels. In this 38
method, the position of tags is used to assign values. Suppose a Strongly Diamond 39
search Edge. If the specified table contains “values of vertices, supervertices, edges, 40
hyperedges, and hyperedges belonging to Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph” with key 41
points, it is redefined. ”values of vertices & number of positions in alphabet”, ”Values 42
of SuperVertices&maximum values of its vertices”, ”values of edges&maximum values of 43
its vertices”, ”super edge values&max values of its vertices”, “super edge values” and 44
maximum values of its endpoints”. To get examples and structural examples, I would 45
like to introduce the next SuperHyperClass SuperHyperGraph based on Strongly 46
Diamond search Edge. This is the original. Having the foundation of the previous 47
definition in the SuperHyperClass type would be disciplined. If there is a need to have 48
all Strongly Diamond search Edge until Strongly Diamond search Edge, then it is 49
officially called “Strongly Diamond search Edge”, but otherwise, it is not Strongly 50
Diamond search Edge. There is some explanation for the original definition titled 51
“Strongly Diamond search Edge”. These two examples are further explored and 52
distinguished because they are characterized in the SuperHyperClass disciplinary 53
methods based on a dominant Strongly Diamond search Edge. Because of having 54
Strongly Diamond search Edge, there is a need to “re-define” the concept of 55
“neutrosophic Strongly Diamond search Edge” and “neutrosophic Strongly Diamond 56
search Edge”. SuperHyperVertices and SuperHyperEdges are assigned by alphabetical 57
labels. In this method, the position of tags is used to assign values. Consider a 58
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph” is redefined if the 59
desired table exists. And if the desired table exists, a Strongly Diamond search Edge is 60
redefined to a “Neutrosophic Strongly Diamond search Edge”. It is useful to define a 61
“Neutrosophic” version of SuperHyperClasses. Since there are more ways to obtain 62
Neutrosophic type results, a SuperHyper- Neutrosophic Strongly Diamond search Edge 63
becomes more understandable. Consider a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. If the 64
desired table exists, there are a number of Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses. So are 65
SuperHyperPath, SuperHyperCycle, SuperHyperStar, SuperHyperBipartite, 66
SuperHyperMultiPartite and SuperHyperWheel. ”Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath”, 67
“Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle”, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar”, “Neutrosophic 68
SuperHyperBipartite”, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultiPartite” and “Neutrosophic 69
SuperHyperWheel”. A graph is SuperHyperUniform if it is a SuperHyperGraph and the 70
number of SuperHyperEdges elements is the same. Consider a Neutrosophic 71
SuperHyperGraph. There are a number of SuperHyperClasses as follows. It is a 72
SuperHyperPath if there is only one SuperVertex as an intersection between two given 73
SuperHyperEdges with two exceptions. If only one SuperVertex is given as an 74
intersection between two SuperHyperEdges, it is SuperHyperCycle. It is 75
SuperHyperStar and only one SuperVertex as intersection among all SuperHyperEdges. 76
It is SuperHyperBipartite, and only one SuperVertex is given as the intersection between 77
two SuperHyperEdges, and these SuperVertices, which form two distinct sets, have no 78
SuperHyperEdge in common. This is SuperHyperMultiPartite. Only one SuperVertex is 79
given as an intersection between two SuperHyperEdges, and these SuperVertices, which 80
form separate multisets, have no SuperHyperEdge in common. If only one 81
SuperHyperEdge among the given two SuperHyperEdges is a SuperHyperWheel and a 82
SuperVertex has a SuperHyperEdge with any regular SuperVertex. SuperHyperModel 83
suggests specific designs and specific architectures. SuperHyperModel is officially called 84
“SuperHyperGraph” and “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph”. In this SuperHyperModel, 85
the “special” cells and the “special group” of cells are SuperHyperModeled as 86
“SuperHyperVertices” and the common and desired properties between the “special” 87
cells and the “special group” of cells. SuperHyperModeled as “SuperHyperEdges”. 88
Sometimes, to have a more accurate SuperHyperModel, it is useful to have some degree 89
of determinism, uncertainty, and neutrality, in this case the SuperHyperModel is called 90
USA
USA
“Neutrosophic”. In future scientific research, the foundation will be based on “diagnosis 91
of cancer” and the results and definitions will be introduced in redeemed methods. 92
Cancer diagnosis in long-term practice. The specific region is assigned by the model 93
(called SuperHyperGraph) and the long cycle of movement of the cancer is determined 94
by this scientific research. Sometimes the movement of cancer is not easy to detect, 95
because there is certainty, uncertainty and neutrality about the movements and effects 96
of cancer on that area. This event leads us to choose another model [which is said to be 97
the Neutrosophic superhypergraph] in order to have a proper understanding of what 98
happened and was done. There are some specific models, which are well known and 99
have names, and some SuperHyperGeneral SuperHyperModels. The movements and 100
effects of cancer in complex pathways and between complex groups of cells can be 101
visualized with a Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath (-/SuperHyperCycle, SuperHyperStar, 102
SuperHyperBipartite, SuperHyperMultipartite, SuperHyperWheel). The goal is to find 103
the longest Strongly Diamond search Edge or the strongest Strongly Diamond search 104
Edge in those Neutrosophic SuperHyperModels. Some general results are presented for 105
the longest Strongly Diamond search Edge called Strongly Diamond search Edge and 106
the strongest Strongly Diamond search Edge called Neutrosophic Strongly Diamond 107
search Edge. Beyond that in SuperHyperStar, all possible SuperHyperPaths have only 108
two SuperHyperEdges, but it is not enough as having at least three SuperHyperEdges is 109
necessary to form any style of cycle. There is no form of any cycle, but literally, it is the 110
transformation of any cycle. It literally transforms and does not form. A basic 111
introduction to the theory of Strongly Diamond search Edge Neutrosophic, 112
SuperHyperGraphs and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs is suggested. 113
Keywords: Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph, SuperHyperStrongly Diamond search Edge, 114
Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition 115
AMS Subject Classification: 05C17, 05C22, 05E45 116
2 Applied Notions Under The Scrutiny Of The 117
Motivation Of This Scientific Research 118
In this scientific research, there are ideas in the prominent frameworks of motivations. I 119
try to bring motivations in narrative ways. Some Cells have faced attacks from the 120
established situation with cancer attacks in this case, there is some analysis embedded 121
in the case current situations where cells can be labeled as some groups and some 122
groups or individuals are overlabeled, all from behaviors to overcome cancer attacks. In 123
embedded situations, cell individuals and cell groups can be considered as “new groups”. 124
So it encourages us to find suitable SuperHyperModels for more appropriate analysis 125
about this dirty story. I found SuperHyperModels, officially called “SuperHyperGraphs” 126
and “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”. In this SuperHyperModel, cells and groups of 127
cells are defined as “SuperHyperVertices” and relationships between individual cells and 128
groups of cells are defined as “SuperHyperEdges”. So this is another motivation for us 129
to do research on this SuperHyperModel based on “cancer diagnosis”. Sometimes, 130
things get worse. The situation has passed certainty and precise style. So it is beyond 131
them. There are three descriptions, i.e., degrees of determination, uncertainty, and 132
neutrality, for any object based on ambiguous forms, i.e., incomplete data, imprecise 133
data, and uncertain analysis. The second model can be considered in the previous 134
SuperHyperModel. This is SuperHyperModel. This is SuperHyperGraph but officially 135
called “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”. Cancer is a disease, but the model is 136
supposed to understand what happens in this phenomenon. The special case of this 137
disease is considered and some parameters are used as consequences of the model. Cells 138
are attacked by the disease, but the movement of cancer is in a specific area. Knowing 139
USA
USA
the mind of cancer can help to find some cures for this disease. SuperHyperGraph and 140
Neutrosophic Super-HyperGraph are super-hypermodels used in “cancer diagnosis” and 141
both are the foundation of the background of this scientific research. Sometimes cancer 142
has occurred in an area full of cells, cell groups, and embedded styles. In this section, 143
SuperHyperModel proposes based on the links of cancer movements in the form of unity 144
styles with the formation of design and architecture officially called “Strongly Diamond 145
search Edge”, in the themes of specialized terms and common words. Particle for direct 146
object. Applied concepts under the investigation of the motivation of this scientific 147
research. The “SuperHyper” prefix refers to the theme of embedded styles for 148
background discovery for SuperHyperNotions. Cancer diagnosis in long-term practice. 149
The specific region is assigned by the model (called SuperHyperGraph) and the long 150
cycle of movement of the cancer is determined by this scientific research. Sometimes the 151
movement of Cancer is not easy to identify because there is certainty, uncertainty and 152
neutrality about the movements and effects of Cancer in that region. This event leads 153
us to choose another model [said to be Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph]. Easy 154
understanding of what happened and what was done. There are some specific models 155
that are well known and named and some general models. The movements and effects 156
of cancer in complex pathways and between complex groups of cells can be visualized by 157
a neurosophic superhyperpath (-/SuperHyperCycle, SuperHyperStar, 158
SuperHyperBipartite, SuperHyperMultipartite, SuperHyperWheel). The goal is to find 159
Strongly Diamond search Edge or Neutrosophic Strongly Diamond search Edge for 160
SuperHyperModels in it. Some general results are presented. Beyond that in 161
SuperHyperStar, all possible Neutrosophic SuperHyperPaths have only two 162
SuperHyperEdges, but it is not enough as having at least three SuperHyperEdges is 163
necessary to form any style of cycle. There is no form of cycle, but it is literally a form 164
of any cycle. It literally transforms and does not form. 165
Question 2.1. How to define “SuperHyperNotions and to do research” to find the 166
“Strongly Diamond search Edge Rate” of any cell or groups of cells based on fixed cell or 167
fixed group of cells broadly, “Strongly Diamond search Edge Rate” based on fixed groups 168
or fixed cells. Groups of groups of cells? 169
Question 2.2. What are the best descriptions for “diagnosing cancer” in terms of 170
these chaotic and dense super-hypermodels in which embedded concepts are depicted? 171
This motivation to find concepts to use in this dense model is called 172
“SuperHyperGraphs”. So it motivates us to define different types of “Strongly Diamond 173
search Edge” and “neutrosophic Strongly Diamond search Edge” over 174
“superhypergraph” and “neutrosophic superhypergraph”. Then this scientific research 175
has taken more motivations to define SuperHyperClasses and find some connections 176
among this SuperHyperNotion with other SuperHyperNotions. It motivates us to obtain 177
examples and examples to clarify the framework of this scientific research. The general 178
results and some of the results about some of the connections are the ways that the key 179
point of this scientific research, “diagnosis of cancer” is more understandable and clear. 180
The framework of this research is as follows. First, I will introduce the basic 181
definitions to clarify the basics. In the “Introductions” subsection, basic definitions 182
about SuperHyperGraphs and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph are introduced and 183
discussed in depth. Basic concepts are thoroughly explained and illustrated, and 184
sometimes a literature review is used to make sense of what is to come in the coming 185
sections. The main definitions and their explanations, along with some results on the 186
new concepts, Strongly Diamond search Edge and Neutrosophic Strongly Diamond 187
search Edge, are specified in the sections “Strongly Diamond search Edge” and 188
“Neutrosophic Strongly Diamond search Edge”. In the concept of dealing with results 189
and in Strongly Diamond search Edge to create logic about the continuation of the 190
USA
USA
scientific research, the ideas of SuperHyperUniform and Neutrosophic 191
SuperHyperUniform are introduced and as their consequences, the corresponding 192
SuperHyperClasses are specified to summarize the work done in this section, as “Results 193
on SuperHyperClasses” and “Results on Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses”. Going back 194
to the core concepts, clever steps towards common concepts to extend new concepts in 195
new frameworks, SuperHyperGraph and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph, in “Results 196
on SuperHyperClasses” and “Results on Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses” sections. 197
There is the initial scientific research on supergeneral relations and as the final and final 198
part of the theoretical scientific research is available in the section “General results”. 199
Some general SuperHyperRelations are fundamental and are known as fundamental 200
SuperHyperNotions, as in “General results” were extracted and discussed. “Strongly 201
Diamond search Edge”, “Neutrosophic Strongly Diamond search Edge”, “Results on 202
SuperHyperClasses” and “Results on Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses”. There are 203
curious questions about what has been done about SuperHyperNotions to make sense of 204
the superiority of this scientific research and to discover the word “best” as a description 205
and adjective of this scientific research as presented in the “Strongly Diamond search 206
Edge” section. The keyword of this scientific research was presented in the section 207
“Applications in cancer diagnosis” with two cases and sub-sections “Case 1: Initial steps 208
towards SuperHyperBipartite as SuperHyperModel” and “Case 2: Incremental steps 209
towards SuperHyperMultiperdel as SuperHyper. In the “open issues” section, there is a 210
detailed examination and recognition of what was done in this scientific research and 211
what happened in this scientific research in the form of “questions” and “issues” in 212
order to understand this scientific research in an outstanding style, the advantages and 213
limitations of this scientific research in addition to What has been done in this scientific 214
research is stated in the “conclusion and final remarks” section. 215
3 Neutrosophic Preliminaries Of This Scientific 216
Research On the Redeemed Ways 217
In this section, the basic material in this scientific research, is referred to [Single Valued 218
Neutrosophic Set](Ref. [1],Definition 2.2,p.2), [Neutrosophic Set](Ref. [1],Definition 219
2.1,p.1), [Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)](Ref. [1],Definition 2.5,p.2), 220
[Characterization of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)](Ref. [1],Definition 221
2.7,p.3), [t-norm](Ref. [1], Definition 2.7, p.3), and [Characterization of the 222
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)](Ref. [1],Definition 2.7,p.3), [Neutrosophic 223
Strength of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperPaths] (Ref. [1],Definition 5.3,p.7), and 224
[Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE)] 225
(Ref. [1],Definition 5.4,p.7). Also, the new ideas and their clarifications are addressed 226
to Ref. [1]. 227
In this subsection, the basic material which is used in this scientific research, is 228
presented. Also, the new ideas and their clarifications are elicited. 229
Definition 3.1 (Neutrosophic Set). (Ref. [1],Definition 2.1,p.1). 230
Let X be a Eulerian-Path-Cut of points (objects) with generic elements in X denoted by

x; then the Neutrosophic set A (NS A) is an object having the form
A = {< x : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) >, x ∈ X}

+
where the functions T, I, F : X →]− 0, 1 [ define respectively the a
truth-membership function, an indeterminacy-membership function, and a
falsity-membership function of the element x ∈ X to the set A with the condition
−
0 ≤ TA (x) + IA (x) + FA (x) ≤ 3+ .
USA
USA
The functions TA (x), IA (x) and FA (x) are real standard or nonstandard subsets of 231
+
]− 0, 1 [. 232
Definition 3.2 (Single Valued Neutrosophic Set). (Ref. [1],Definition 2.2,p.2). 233
Let X be a Eulerian-Path-Cut of points (objects) with generic elements in X denoted by

x. A single valued Neutrosophic set A (SVNS A) is characterized by
truth-membership function TA (x), an indeterminacy-membership function IA (x), and a
falsity-membership function FA (x). For each point x in X, TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) ∈ [0, 1].
A SVNS A can be written as
A = {< x : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) >, x ∈ X}.
Definition 3.3. The degree of truth-membership,

indeterminacy-membership and falsity-membership of the subset X ⊂ A of
the single valued Neutrosophic set A = {< x : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) >, x ∈ X}:
TA (X) = min[TA (vi ), TA (vj )]vi ,vj ∈X ,
IA (X) = min[IA (vi ), IA (vj )]vi ,vj ∈X ,

and FA (X) = min[FA (vi ), FA (vj )]vi ,vj ∈X .
Definition 3.4. The support of X ⊂ A of the single valued Neutrosophic set
A = {< x : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) >, x ∈ X}:
supp(X) = {x ∈ X : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) > 0}.
Definition 3.5 (Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)). (Ref. [1],Definition 234
2.5,p.2). 235
Assume V 0 is a given set. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a 236
pair S = (V, E), where 237
(i) V = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vn } a finite set of finite single valued Neutrosophic subsets of V 0 ; 238
(ii) V = {(Vi , TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), FV 0 (Vi )) : TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), FV 0 (Vi ) ≥ 0}, (i = 239
1, 2, . . . , n); 240
(iii) E = {E1 , E2 , . . . , En0 } a finite set of finite single valued Neutrosophic subsets of 241
V; 242
(iv) E = {(Ei0 , TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 )) : TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 ) ≥ 0}, (i0 = 243
1, 2, . . . , n0 ); 244
(v) Vi 6= ∅, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n); 245
(vi) Ei0 6= ∅, (i0 = 1, 2, . . . , n0 ); 246
P
(vii) i supp(Vi ) = V, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n); 247
0 0
P
(viii) i0 supp(Ei ) = V, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n );
0 248
(ix) and the following conditions hold:
TV0 (Ei0 ) ≤ min[TV 0 (Vi ), TV 0 (Vj )]Vi ,Vj ∈Ei0 ,
IV0 (Ei0 ) ≤ min[IV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vj )]Vi ,Vj ∈Ei0 ,

and FV0 (Ei0 ) ≤ min[FV 0 (Vi ), FV 0 (Vj )]Vi ,Vj ∈Ei0
where i0 = 1, 2, . . . , n0 . 249
USA
USA
Figure 1. The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with a illustrated SuperHyperModeling

on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example (3.6)
Here the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE) Ej 0 and the Neutrosophic 250
SuperHyperVertices (NSHV) Vj are single valued Neutrosophic sets. TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), 251
and FV 0 (Vi ) denote the degree of truth-membership, the degree of 252
indeterminacy-membership and the degree of falsity-membership the Neutrosophic 253
SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vi to the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) V. 254
TV0 (Ei0 ), TV0 (Ei0 ), and TV0 (Ei0 ) denote the degree of truth-membership, the degree of 255
indeterminacy-membership and the degree of falsity-membership of the Neutrosophic 256
SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) Ei0 to the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) E. Thus, 257
the ii0 th element of the incidence matrix of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) 258
are of the form (Vi , TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 )), the sets V and E are crisp sets. 259
Example 3.6. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair 260
S = (V, E) in the mentioned Neutrosophic Figures in every Neutrosophic items. 261
• On the Figure (1), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic 262
notion, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. E1 263
and E3 are some empty Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges but E2 is a loop 264
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge and E4 is a Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge. Thus 265
in the terms of Neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighbor, there’s only one Neutrosophic 266
SuperHyperEdge, namely, E4 . The Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex, V3 is 267
Neutrosophic isolated means that there’s no Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge has it 268
as a Neutrosophic endpoint. 269
notion, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 271
E1 , E2 and E3 are some empty Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges but E4 is a 272
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge. Thus in the terms of Neutrosophic 273
SuperHyperNeighbor, there’s only one Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge, namely, 274
E4 . The Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex, V3 is Neutrosophic isolated means that 275
there’s no Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge has it as a Neutrosophic endpoint. 276
• On the Figure (3), the SuperHyperNotion, namely, SuperHyperGirth, is up. 277
E1 , E2 and E3 are some empty SuperHyperEdges but E4 is a SuperHyperEdge. 278
Thus in the terms of SuperHyperNeighbor, theres only one SuperHyperEdge, 279
namely, E4 . 280
USA
USA
Figure 2. TThe Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with a illustrated SuperHyperModel-

ing on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example (3.6)
Figure 3. The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with a illustrated SuperHyperModeling

on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example (3.6)
USA
USA
Figure 4. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with a illustrated Super-

HyperModeling on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example (3.6)
• On the Figure (4), theres no empty SuperHyperEdge but E3 are a loop 281
SuperHyperEdge on {F } and there are some SuperHyperEdges, namely, E1 on 282
{H, V1 , V3 }, alongside E2 on {O, H, V4 , V3 } and E4 , E5 on {N, V1 , V2 , V3 , F }. 283
• On the Figure (5),theres neither empty SuperHyperEdge nor loop 284
SuperHyperEdge. 285
• On the Figure (6), theres neither empty SuperHyperEdge nor loop 286
SuperHyperEdge. 287
SuperHyperEdge. 289
SuperHyperEdge. 291
SuperHyperEdge. 293
SuperHyperEdge. 295
SuperHyperEdge. 297
SuperHyperEdge. 299
SuperHyperEdge. 301
SuperHyperEdge. 303
SuperHyperEdge. 305
USA
USA
Figure 5. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs mentioned as the SuperHy-

perModeling on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example (3.6)
Figure 6. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with a illustrated Super-

HyperModeling on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example (3.6)
USA
USA
Figure 7. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs depicted SuperHyperMod-

eling on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example (3.6)
Figure 8. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with dense SuperHyper-

Modeling on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example (3.6)
USA
USA
Figure 9. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with a messy SuperHyper-

Modeling on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example (3.6)
Figure 10. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with highly-embedding-

connected SuperHyperModeling on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example
(3.6)
USA
USA
Figure 11. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with a SuperHyperModel-

Figure 12. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with highly-multiple-

connected-style SuperHyperModeling on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic
Example (3.6)
USA
USA


USA
USA
Figure 15. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with Linearly-Connected

SuperHyperModeling on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example (3.6)

USA
USA
Figure 17. The Connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs with a Linearly-over-

packed SuperHyperModeling on Recognition of Cancer in the Neutrosophic Example
(3.6)
SuperHyperEdge. 307
SuperHyperEdge. 309
SuperHyperEdge. 311
SuperHyperEdge. 313
SuperHyperEdge. 315
SuperHyperEdge. 317
SuperHyperEdge. 319
Definition 3.7 (Characterization of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)). 320
(Ref. [1],Definition 2.7,p.3). 321
Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair S = (V, E). The 322
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE) Ei0 and the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices 323
(NSHV) Vi of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S = (V, E) could be 324
characterized as follow-up items. 325
(i) If |Vi | = 1, then Vi is called vertex; 326
(ii) if |Vi | ≥ 1, then Vi is called SuperVertex; 327
USA
USA


USA
USA


USA
USA

(iii) if for all Vi s are incident in Ei0 , |Vi | = 1, and |Ei0 | = 2, then Ei0 is called edge; 328
(iv) if for all Vi s are incident in Ei0 , |Vi | = 1, and |Ei0 | ≥ 2, then Ei0 is called 329
HyperEdge; 330
(v) if there’s a Vi is incident in Ei0 such that |Vi | ≥ 1, and |Ei0 | = 2, then Ei0 is called 331
SuperEdge; 332
(vi) if there’s a Vi is incident in Ei0 such that |Vi | ≥ 1, and |Ei0 | ≥ 2, then Ei0 is called 333
SuperHyperEdge. 334
If we choose different types of binary operations, then we could get hugely diverse 335
types of general forms of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG). 336
Definition 3.8 (t-norm). (Ref. [1], Definition 2.7, p.3). 337
A binary operation ⊗ : [0, 1] × [0, 1] → [0, 1] is a t-norm if it satisfies the following 338
for x, y, z, w ∈ [0, 1]: 339
(i) 1 ⊗ x = x; 340
(ii) x ⊗ y = y ⊗ x; 341
(iii) x ⊗ (y ⊗ z) = (x ⊗ y) ⊗ z; 342
(iv) If w ≤ x and y ≤ z then w ⊗ y ≤ x ⊗ z. 343
Definition 3.9. The degree of truth-membership, indeterminacy-membership

and falsity-membership of the subset X ⊂ A of the single valued Neutrosophic set
A = {< x : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) >, x ∈ X} (with respect to t-norm Tnorm ):
TA (X) = Tnorm [TA (vi ), TA (vj )]vi ,vj ∈X ,
IA (X) = Tnorm [IA (vi ), IA (vj )]vi ,vj ∈X ,

and FA (X) = Tnorm [FA (vi ), FA (vj )]vi ,vj ∈X .
USA
USA
Definition 3.10. The support of X ⊂ A of the single valued Neutrosophic set

A = {< x : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) >, x ∈ X}:
supp(X) = {x ∈ X : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) > 0}.
Definition 3.11. (General Forms of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)). 344
Assume V 0 is a given set. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a 345
pair S = (V, E), where 346
(i) V = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vn } a finite set of finite single valued Neutrosophic subsets of V 0 ; 347
(ii) V = {(Vi , TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), FV 0 (Vi )) : TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), FV 0 (Vi ) ≥ 0}, (i = 348
1, 2, . . . , n); 349
(iii) E = {E1 , E2 , . . . , En0 } a finite set of finite single valued Neutrosophic subsets of 350
V; 351
(iv) E = {(Ei0 , TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 )) : TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 ) ≥ 0}, (i0 = 352
1, 2, . . . , n0 ); 353
(v) Vi 6= ∅, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n); 354
(vi) Ei0 6= ∅, (i0 = 1, 2, . . . , n0 ); 355
P
(vii) i supp(Vi ) = V, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n); 356
0 0
P
(viii) i0 supp(Ei ) = V, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n ).
0 357
Here the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE) Ej 0 and the Neutrosophic 358
SuperHyperVertices (NSHV) Vj are single valued Neutrosophic sets. TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), 359
and FV 0 (Vi ) denote the degree of truth-membership, the degree of 360
indeterminacy-membership and the degree of falsity-membership the Neutrosophic 361
SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vi to the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) V. 362
TV0 (Ei0 ), TV0 (Ei0 ), and TV0 (Ei0 ) denote the degree of truth-membership, the degree of 363
indeterminacy-membership and the degree of falsity-membership of the Neutrosophic 364
SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) Ei0 to the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) E. Thus, 365
the ii0 th element of the incidence matrix of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) 366
are of the form (Vi , TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 )), the sets V and E are crisp sets. 367
Definition 3.12 (Characterization of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)). 368
Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair S = (V, E). The 370
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE) Ei0 and the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices 371
(NSHV) Vi of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S = (V, E) could be 372
characterized as follow-up items. 373
(i) If |Vi | = 1, then Vi is called vertex; 374
(ii) if |Vi | ≥ 1, then Vi is called SuperVertex; 375
(iii) if for all Vi s are incident in Ei0 , |Vi | = 1, and |Ei0 | = 2, then Ei0 is called edge; 376
(iv) if for all Vi s are incident in Ei0 , |Vi | = 1, and |Ei0 | ≥ 2, then Ei0 is called 377
HyperEdge; 378
(v) if there’s a Vi is incident in Ei0 such that |Vi | ≥ 1, and |Ei0 | = 2, then Ei0 is called 379
SuperEdge; 380
USA
USA
(vi) if there’s a Vi is incident in Ei0 such that |Vi | ≥ 1, and |Ei0 | ≥ 2, then Ei0 is called 381
SuperHyperEdge. 382
This SuperHyperModel is too messy and too dense. Thus there’s a need to have 383
some restrictions and conditions on SuperHyperGraph. The special case of this 384
SuperHyperGraph makes the patterns and regularities. 385
Definition 3.13. A graph is SuperHyperUniform if it’s SuperHyperGraph and the 386
number of elements of SuperHyperEdges are the same. 387
To get more visions on SuperHyperUniform, the some SuperHyperClasses are 388
introduced. It makes to have SuperHyperUniform more understandable. 389
Definition 3.14. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. There are some 390
SuperHyperClasses as follows. 391
(i). It’s Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath if it’s only one SuperVertex as 392
intersection amid two given SuperHyperEdges with two exceptions; 393
(ii). it’s SuperHyperCycle if it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid two 394
given SuperHyperEdges; 395
(iii). it’s SuperHyperStar it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid all 396
SuperHyperEdges; 397
(iv). it’s SuperHyperBipartite it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid two 398
given SuperHyperEdges and these SuperVertices, forming two separate sets, has 399
no SuperHyperEdge in common; 400
(v). it’s SuperHyperMultiPartite it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid 401
two given SuperHyperEdges and these SuperVertices, forming multi separate sets, 402
has no SuperHyperEdge in common; 403
(vi). it’s SuperHyperWheel if it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid two 404
given SuperHyperEdges and one SuperVertex has one SuperHyperEdge with any 405
common SuperVertex. 406
Example 3.15. In the Figure (23), the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath 407
ESHP : (V, E), is highlighted and featured. The Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, in the 408
Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (23), is the notion. 409
Example 3.16. In the Figure (24), the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle 410
N SHC : (V, E), is highlighted and featured. The obtained Neutrosophic 411
SuperHyperSet, in the Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (24), is up. 412
Example 3.17. In the Figure (25), the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar 413
ESHS : (V, E), is highlighted and featured. The obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, 414
by the Algorithm in previous Neutrosophic result, of the Neutrosophic 415
SuperHyperVertices of the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar ESHS : (V, E), in 416
the Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (25), is up. 417
Example 3.18. In the Neutrosophic Figure (26), the connected Neutrosophic 418
SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E), is Neutrosophic highlighted and Neutrosophic 419
featured. The obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, by the Neutrosophic Algorithm in 420
previous Neutrosophic result, of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of the connected 421
Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E), in the Neutrosophic 422
SuperHyperModel (26), is up. 423
USA
USA
Figure 23. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath Associated to the Notions in the Example

(3.15)
Figure 24. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions

in the Neutrosophic Example (3.16)
USA
USA
Figure 25. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions in

the Neutrosophic Example (3.17)
Figure 26. Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite Neutrosophic Associated to the Neutro-

sophic Notions in the Example (3.18)
USA
USA
Figure 27. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite Associated to the Notions in the

Example (3.19)
Figure 28. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel Neutrosophic Associated to the Neutro-

sophic Notions in the Neutrosophic Example (3.20)
Example 3.19. In the Figure (27), the connected Neutrosophic 424
SuperHyperMultipartite ESHM : (V, E), is highlighted and Neutrosophic featured. 425
The obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, by the Algorithm in previous Neutrosophic 426
result, of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of the connected Neutrosophic 427
SuperHyperMultipartite ESHM : (V, E), in the Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (27), 428
is up. 429
Example 3.20. In the Neutrosophic Figure (28), the connected Neutrosophic 430
SuperHyperWheel N SHW : (V, E), is Neutrosophic highlighted and featured. The 431
obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, by the Algorithm in previous result, of the 432
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel 433
ESHW : (V, E), in the Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (28), is up. 434
Definition 3.21. Let a pair S = (V, E) be a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)

S. Then a sequence of Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices (NSHV) and Neutrosophic
USA
USA
SuperHyperEdges (NSHE)
V1 , E1 , V2 , E2 , V3 , . . . , Vs−1 , Es−1 , Vs
is called a Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic 435
SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) V1 to Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vs if either 436
of following conditions hold: 437
(i) Vi , Vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 438
(ii) there’s a vertex vi ∈ Vi such that vi , Vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 439
(iii) there’s a SuperVertex Vi0 ∈ Vi such that Vi0 , Vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 440
(iv) there’s a vertex vi+1 ∈ Vi+1 such that Vi , vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 441
0 0
(v) there’s a SuperVertex Vi+1 ∈ Vi+1 such that Vi , Vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 442
(vi) there are a vertex vi ∈ Vi and a vertex vi+1 ∈ Vi+1 such that vi , vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 443
0 0
(vii) there are a vertex vi ∈ Vi and a SuperVertex Vi+1 ∈ Vi+1 such that vi , Vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 444
(viii) there are a SuperVertex Vi0 ∈ Vi and a vertex vi+1 ∈ Vi+1 such that Vi0 , vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 445
(ix) there are a SuperVertex Vi0 ∈ Vi and a SuperVertex Vi+1

0
∈ Vi+1 such that 446
Vi0 , Vi+1
0
∈ Ei0 . 447
Definition 3.22. (Characterization of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperPaths). 448
Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair S = (V, E). a

Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV)
V1 to Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vs is sequence of Neutrosophic
SuperHyperVertices (NSHV) and Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE)
V1 , E1 , V2 , E2 , V3 , . . . , Vs−1 , Es−1 , Vs ,
could be characterized as follow-up items. 449
(i) If for all Vi , Ej 0 , |Vi | = 1, |Ej 0 | = 2, then NSHP is called path; 450
(ii) if for all Ej 0 , |Ej 0 | = 2, and there’s Vi , |Vi | ≥ 1, then NSHP is called SuperPath; 451
(iii) if for all Vi , Ej 0 , |Vi | = 1, |Ej 0 | ≥ 2, then NSHP is called HyperPath; 452
(iv) if there are Vi , Ej 0 , |Vi | ≥ 1, |Ej 0 | ≥ 2, then NSHP is called Neutrosophic 453
SuperHyperPath . 454
Definition 3.23 (Neutrosophic Strength of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperPaths). 455
Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair S = (V, E). A

Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV)
V1 to Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vs is sequence of Neutrosophic
SuperHyperVertices (NSHV) and Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE)
V1 , E1 , V2 , E2 , V3 , . . . , Vs−1 , Es−1 , Vs ,
have 457
(i) Neutrosophic t-strength (min{T (Vi )}, m, n)si=1 ; 458
(ii) Neutrosophic i-strength (m, min{I(Vi )}, n)si=1 ; 459
USA
USA
Table 1. The Values of Vertices, SuperVertices, Edges, HyperEdges, and SuperHy-

perEdges Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph Mentioned in the Definition
(3.27)
The Values of The Vertices The Number of Position in Alphabet
The Values of The SuperVertices The maximum Values of Its Vertices
The Values of The Edges The maximum Values of Its Vertices
The Values of The HyperEdges The maximum Values of Its Vertices
The Values of The SuperHyperEdges The maximum Values of Its Endpoints
(iii) Neutrosophic f-strength (m, n, min{F (Vi )})si=1 ; 460
(iv) Neutrosophic strength (min{T (Vi )}, min{I(Vi )}, min{F (Vi )})si=1 . 461
Definition 3.24 (Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges 462
(NSHE)). (Ref. [1],Definition 5.4,p.7). 463
Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair S = (V, E). Consider 464
a Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) E = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vs }. Then E is called 465
(ix) Neutrosophic t-connective if T (E) ≥ maximum number of Neutrosophic 466
t-strength of SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex 467
(NSHV) Vi to Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vj where 1 ≤ i, j ≤ s; 468
(x) Neutrosophic i-connective if I(E) ≥ maximum number of Neutrosophic 469
i-strength of SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex 470
(xi) Neutrosophic f-connective if F (E) ≥ maximum number of Neutrosophic 472
f-strength of SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex 473
(xii) Neutrosophic connective if (T (E), I(E), F (E)) ≥ maximum number of 475
Neutrosophic strength of SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic 476
SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vi to Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vj 477
where 1 ≤ i, j ≤ s. 478
For the sake of having a Neutrosophic notion, there’s a need to “redefine” the 479
notion of “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph”. The SuperHyperVertices and the 480
SuperHyperEdges are assigned by the labels from the letters of the alphabets. In this 481
procedure, there’s the usage of the position of labels to assign to the values. 482
Definition 3.25. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (SHG) S is a pair 483
S = (V, E). It’s redefined Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph if the Table (1) holds. 484
It’s useful to define a “Neutrosophic” version of SuperHyperClasses. Since there’s 485
more ways to get Neutrosophic type-results to make a Neutrosophic more 486
understandable. 487
Definition 3.26. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (SHG) S is a pair 488
S = (V, E). There are some Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses if the Table (2) 489
holds. Thus Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath , notion, SuperHyperStar, 490
SuperHyperBipartite, SuperHyperMultiPartite, and SuperHyperWheel, are 491
Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath, Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle, 492
Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar, Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite, 493
Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultiPartite, and Neutrosophic 494
SuperHyperWheel if the Table (2) holds. 495
USA
USA

perEdges Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph, Mentioned in the Definition
(3.26)

perEdges Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph Mentioned in the Definition
(3.27)
It’s useful to define a “Neutrosophic” version of a Neutrosophic notion. Since there’s 496
more ways to get type-results to make a Neutrosophic notion more Neutrosophicly 497
understandable. 498
For the sake of having a Neutrosophic notion, there’s a need to “redefine” the 499
Neutrosophic notion of “Neutrosophic notion”. The SuperHyperVertices and the 500
SuperHyperEdges are assigned by the labels from the letters of the alphabets. In this 501
procedure, there’s the usage of the position of labels to assign to the values. 502
Definition 3.27. Assume a notion. It’s redefined a Neutrosophic notion if the 503
Table (3) holds. 504
Example 3.28. Referred to the Example (3.6), assume a Neutrosophic 505
SuperHyperGraph (SHG) S is a pair S = (V, E) in the mentioned Neutrosophic Figures 506
in every Neutrosophic items. 507
SuperHyperGraph (SHG), is up in the illustration of the Table (4). 509
Table 4. The Values of Vertices, SuperVertices, Edges, HyperEdges, and SuperHyper-

Edges Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph
Vi (TVi , IVi , FVi ) Ei (TEi , IEi , FEi )
V1 (0.13, 0.13, 0.13) E1 (0, 0, 0)
V2 (0.13, 0.13, 0.13) E2 (0.13, 0.13, 0.13)
V3 (0.15, 0.15, 0.15) E3 (0, 0, 0)
V4 (0.14, 0.14, 0.14) E4 (0.14, 0.14, 0.14)
USA
USA

V1 (0.13, 0.13, 0.13) E1 (0, 0, 0)
V2 (0.03, 0.03, 0.03) E2 (0, 0, 0)
V3 (0.15, 0.15, 0.15) E3 (0, 0, 0)
V4 (0.14, 0.14, 0.14) E4 (0.14, 0.14, 0.14)

V1 (0.13, 0.13, 0.13) E1 (0, 0, 0)
V2 (0.11, 0.11, 0.11) E2 (0, 0, 0)
V3 (0.14, 0.14, 0.14) E3 (0, 0, 0)
- - E4 (0.14, 0.14, 0.14)

V1 (0.13, 0.13, 0.13) E1 (0.08, 0.08, 0.08)
V2 (0.11, 0.11, 0.11) E2 (0.15, 0.15, 0.15)
V3 (0.05, 0.05, 0.05) E3 (0, 0, 0)
V4 (0.12, 0.12, 0.12) E4 (0.14, 0.14, 0.14)
{F } (0.06, 0.06, 0.06) E5 (0.14, 0.14, 0.14)
{H} (0.08, 0.08, 0.08) - -
{N } (0.14, 0.14, 0.14) - -
{O} (0.15, 0.15, 0.15) - -
USA
USA

4 Main Resultant 516
Definition 4.1. (Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic SuperHyperStrongly 517
Diamond search Edge). 518
Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E). Consider a 519
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet As = {E1 , E2 , . . . , Es }. Then As is called Neutrosophic 520
SuperHyperDiamond search Edge if the following expressions, terms and statements is called 521
Neutrosophic SuperHyperDiamond search Edge criteria holds. 522
X X X
|( T (Ei ), I(Ei ), F (Ei ))|
Ei ∈As Ei ∈As Ei ∈As
X X X
= max |{ ( T (Ei ), I(Ei ), F (Ei )) |
Bs ⊆EN SHG
}|.
Example 4.2. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel (SHG) S is a pair S = (V, E) 523
in the mentioned Neutrosophic Figures in every Neutrosophic items. 524
SuperHyperWheel (SHG), is up in the illustration of the Table (8). 526
Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E). Consider a 527
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet As = {E1 , E2 , . . . , Es }. Then As is called 528
Neutrosophic SuperHyperDiamond search Edge if the following expressions, terms and 529
X
|( T (Ei ),
Ei ∈As
USA
USA


USA
USA
Figure 32. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar Neutrosophic Associated to the Neutro-


USA
USA


USA
USA


USA
USA


USA
USA


USA
USA

Edges Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel
V1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V3 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) E3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V4 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V5 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V6 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V7 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)

V1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) E2 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24)
V3 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) E3 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23)
V4 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) V5 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23)
V6 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) V7 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
X
I(Ei ),
Ei ∈As
X
F (Ei ))|
Ei ∈As
= (0, 0, 0) =
X X X
max |{ ( T (Ei ), I(Ei ), F (Ei )) |
Bs ⊆EN SHG
}|.
X
|( T (Ei ),
Ei ∈As
X
I(Ei ),
Ei ∈As
X
F (Ei ))|
Ei ∈As
= (0, 0, 0) =
X X X
max |{ ( T (Ei ), I(Ei ), F (Ei )) |
Bs ⊆EN SHG
}|.
USA
USA
V1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.19, 0.19, 0.19) E2 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24)
V3 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) E3 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23)
V4 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) V5 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23)
V6 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) V7 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.19, 0.19, 0.19) E2 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24)
V3 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) E3 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23)
V4 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) V5 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23)
V6 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) V7 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23)
X
|( T (Ei ),
Ei ∈As
X
I(Ei ),
Ei ∈As
X
F (Ei ))|
Ei ∈As
= (0, 0, 0) =
X X X
max |{ ( T (Ei ), I(Ei ), F (Ei )) |
Bs ⊆EN SHG
}|.
X
|( T (Ei ),
Ei ∈As
X
I(Ei ),
Ei ∈As
USA
USA
V1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.19, 0.19, 0.19) E2 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24)
V3 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) E3 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24)
V4 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) V5 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23)
V6 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) V7 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23)
X
F (Ei ))|
Ei ∈As
= (0, 0, 0) =
X X X
max |{ ( T (Ei ), I(Ei ), F (Ei )) |
Bs ⊆EN SHG
}|.
X
|( T (Ei ),
Ei ∈As
X
I(Ei ),
Ei ∈As
X
F (Ei ))|
Ei ∈As
= (0, 0, 0) =
X X X
max |{ ( T (Ei ), I(Ei ), F (Ei )) |
Bs ⊆EN SHG
}|.
X
|( T (Ei ),
Ei ∈As
X
I(Ei ),
Ei ∈As
USA
USA
V1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.19, 0.19, 0.19) E2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V3 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) E3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V4 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V5 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23)
V6 (0.24, 0.24, 0.24) V7 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23)
Edges Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar
V1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V4 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V5 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V6 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V7 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
X
F (Ei ))|
Ei ∈As
= (0, 0, 0) =
X X X
max |{ ( T (Ei ), I(Ei ), F (Ei )) |
Bs ⊆EN SHG
}|.
Example 4.3. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar (SHG) S is a pair S = (V, E) 561
in the mentioned Neutrosophic Figures in every Neutrosophic items. 562
SuperHyperStar (SHG), is up in the illustration of the Table (14). 564
Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E). Consider a 565
X
|( T (Ei ),
Ei ∈As
X
I(Ei ),
Ei ∈As
X
F (Ei ))|
Ei ∈As
= (0, 0, 0) =
X X X
max |{ ( T (Ei ), I(Ei ), F (Ei )) |
Bs ⊆EN SHG
}|.
USA
USA
V1 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V4 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V5 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V6 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V7 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V1 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V3 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) E3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V4 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V5 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V6 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V7 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
X
|( T (Ei ),
Ei ∈As
X
I(Ei ),
Ei ∈As
X
F (Ei ))|
Ei ∈As
= (0, 0, 0) =
X X X
max |{ ( T (Ei ), I(Ei ), F (Ei )) |
Bs ⊆EN SHG
}|.
X
|( T (Ei ),
Ei ∈As
X
I(Ei ),
Ei ∈As
USA
USA
V1 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V3 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) E3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V4 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) V5 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V6 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V7 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
X
F (Ei ))|
Ei ∈As
= (0, 0, 0) =
X X X
max |{ ( T (Ei ), I(Ei ), F (Ei )) |
Bs ⊆EN SHG
}|.
X
|( T (Ei ),
Ei ∈As
X
I(Ei ),
Ei ∈As
X
F (Ei ))|
Ei ∈As
= (0, 0, 0) =
X X X
max |{ ( T (Ei ), I(Ei ), F (Ei )) |
Bs ⊆EN SHG
}|.
X
|( T (Ei ),
Ei ∈As
X
I(Ei ),
Ei ∈As
USA
USA
V1 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V3 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) E3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V4 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) V5 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23)
V6 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) V7 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V1 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V3 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) E3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V4 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) V5 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23)
V6 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) V7 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
X
F (Ei ))|
Ei ∈As
= (0, 0, 0) =
X X X
max |{ ( T (Ei ), I(Ei ), F (Ei )) |
Bs ⊆EN SHG
}|.
X
|( T (Ei ),
Ei ∈As
X
I(Ei ),
Ei ∈As
X
F (Ei ))|
Ei ∈As
= (0, 0, 0) =
X X X
max |{ ( T (Ei ), I(Ei ), F (Ei )) |
Bs ⊆EN SHG
}|.
USA
USA
V1 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) E1 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26) E2 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V3 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) E3 (0.26, 0.26, 0.26)
V4 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) V5 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23)
V6 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23) V7 (0.23, 0.23, 0.23)
X
|( T (Ei ),
Ei ∈As
X
I(Ei ),
Ei ∈As
X
F (Ei ))|
Ei ∈As
= (0, 0, 0) =
X X X
max |{ ( T (Ei ), I(Ei ), F (Ei )) |
Bs ⊆EN SHG
}|.
5 Main Result 605
Theorem 5.1. (Main Result and Main Theorem). 606
Assume every Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar has the letter z. The notion on the 607
Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar and Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel coincides. 608
Proof. 609
(i). Let 610
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
CEN T ER, E2
611
P :
E1 , V1EXT ERN AL ,
E2 , CEN T ER
be a longest path taken a connected Extreme SuperHyperStar ESHS : (V, E). There’s 612
a new way to redefine as 613
ViEXT ERN AL ∼ VjEXT ERN AL ≡

∃!Ez ∈ EESHG:(V,E) , ViEXT ERN AL , VjEXT ERN AL ∈ Ez ≡
USA
USA
∃!Ez ∈ EESHG:(V,E) , {ViEXT ERN AL , VjEXT ERN AL } ⊆ Ez .
The term “EXTERNAL” implies |N (ViEXT ERN AL )| ≥ |N (Vj )| where Vj is 614
corresponded to ViEXT ERN AL in the literatures of Neutrosophic SuperHyperStrongly 615
Diamond search Edge. The latter is straightforward. 616
(ii). Let 617
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1∗ ,
CEN T ER, E2∗
618
P :
E1∗ , V1EXT ERN AL ,
E2∗ , CEN T ER
is a longest SuperHyperStrongly Diamond search Edge taken from a connected Extreme 619
SuperHyperWheel ESHW : (V, E). There’s a new way to redefine as 620

Diamond search Edge. The latter is straightforward. Then there’s at least one Neutrosophic 623
SuperHyperStrongly Diamond search Edge. Thus the notion of quasi isn’t up and the 624
SuperHyperNotions based on Neutrosophic SuperHyperStrongly Diamond search Edge could be 625
applied. The unique embedded Neutrosophic SuperHyperStrongly Diamond search Edge proposes 626
some longest Neutrosophic SuperHyperStrongly Diamond search Edge excerpt from some 627
representatives. The latter is straightforward. 628
Proposition 5.2. Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E).

Assume every Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex has the letter z. The Neutrosophic
SuperHyperStrongly Diamond search Edge set is as follows.
{CEN T ER}.
Proof. Let 629
P :
CEN T ER, E2∗
630
P :
E2∗ , CEN T ER
USA
USA


SuperHyperStrongly Diamond search Edge number is as follows.
0.26.
Proof. Let 641
P :
CEN T ER, E2∗
642
P :
E2∗ , CEN T ER

Proposition 5.4. Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E).

SuperHyperStrongly Diamond search Edge set is as follows.
{CEN T ER}.
Proof. Let 653
P :
USA
USA
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
CEN T ER, E2
654
P :
E1 , V1EXT ERN AL ,
E2 , CEN T ER

Proposition 5.5. Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E).

SuperHyperStrongly Diamond search Edge number is as follows.
0.26.
Proof. Let 660
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
CEN T ER, E2
661
P :
E1 , V1EXT ERN AL ,
E2 , CEN T ER

Definition 5.6. (Uniform Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar and Uniform Neutrosophic 667
SuperHyperStar). 668
(i). Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E). Every pair of 669
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices has the same maximum letter, i.e., 670
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices mutually has the same maximum letter. A 671
Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E) is called Uniform 672
Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar. 673
USA
USA
(ii). Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E). Every pair 674
of Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices has the same maximum letter, i.e., 675
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices mutually has the same maximum letter. A 676
Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E) is called Uniform 677
Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel. 678
Proposition 5.7. Let an Uniform Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel (SHG) S be a pair

S = (V, E). The Neutrosophic SuperHyperStrongly Diamond search Edge set is as follows.
{CEN T ER}.
Proof. Let 679
P :
CEN T ER, E2∗
680
P :
E2∗ , CEN T ER


The Neutrosophic SuperHyperStrongly Diamond search Edge number is lower than as follows.
0.26.
Proof. Let 691
P :
CEN T ER, E2∗
692
P :
E2∗ , CEN T ER
USA
USA

Proposition 5.9. Let an Uniform Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar (SHG) S be a pair

S = (V, E). The Neutrosophic SuperHyperStrongly Diamond search Edge set is as follows.
{CEN T ER}.
Proof. Let 703
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
CEN T ER, E2
704
P :
E1 , V1EXT ERN AL ,
E2 , CEN T ER

Proposition 5.10. Let an Uniform Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar (SHG) S be a pair

S = (V, E). The Neutrosophic SuperHyperStrongly Diamond search Edge number is lower than as
follows.
0.26.
Proof. Let 710
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
CEN T ER, E2
USA
USA
711
P :
E1 , V1EXT ERN AL ,
E2 , CEN T ER

Proposition 5.11. (Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar and Neutrosophic 717
SuperHyperWheel). 718
(i). Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E). Assume every 719
Neutrosophic CENTER has the letter maximum letter. Then the Neutrosophic 720
SuperHyperVertices don’t have the same maximum letter, are in every 721
Neutrosophic SuperHyperStrongly Diamond search Edge set. 722
(ii). Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E). Assume 723
every Neutrosophic CENTER has the letter maximum letter. Then the 724
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices don’t have the same maximum letter, are in 725
every Neutrosophic SuperHyperStrongly Diamond search Edge set. 726
Proof. 727
(i). Let 728
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
CEN T ER, E2
729
P :
E1 , V1EXT ERN AL ,
E2 , CEN T ER

USA
USA
(ii). Let 735
P :
CEN T ER, E2∗
736
P :
E2∗ , CEN T ER

Proposition 5.12. (Embedded Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar and Embedded 747
Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar). 748
(i). Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E). Then 749
CENTER is in every Neutrosophic SuperHyperStrongly Diamond search Edge set. 750
(ii). Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel (SHG) S be a pair S = (V, E). Then 751
CENTER is in every Neutrosophic SuperHyperStrongly Diamond search Edge set. 752
Proof. 753
(i). Let 754
P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
CEN T ER, E2
755
P :
E1 , V1EXT ERN AL ,
E2 , CEN T ER

USA
USA

(ii). Let 761
P :
CEN T ER, E2∗
762
P :
E2∗ , CEN T ER

6 Neutrosophic Applications in Cancer’s 773
Neutrosophic Recognition 774
The cancer is the Neutrosophic disease but the Neutrosophic model is going to figure 775
out what’s going on this Neutrosophic phenomenon. The special Neutrosophic case of 776
this Neutrosophic disease is considered and as the consequences of the model, some 777
parameters are used. The cells are under attack of this disease but the moves of the 778
cancer in the special region are the matter of mind. The Neutrosophic recognition of the 779
cancer could help to find some Neutrosophic treatments for this Neutrosophic disease. 780
In the following, some Neutrosophic steps are Neutrosophic devised on this disease. 781
Step 1. (Neutrosophic Definition) The Neutrosophic recognition of the cancer in 782
the long-term Neutrosophic function. 783
Step 2. (Neutrosophic Issue) The specific region has been assigned by the 784
Neutrosophic model [it’s called Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph] and the long 785
Neutrosophic cycle of the move from the cancer is identified by this research. 786
Sometimes the move of the cancer hasn’t be easily identified since there are some 787
determinacy, indeterminacy and neutrality about the moves and the effects of the 788
cancer on that region; this event leads us to choose another model [it’s said to be 789
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph] to have convenient perception on what’s 790
happened and what’s done. 791
USA
USA
Figure 42. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite Associated to the Notions of Neutro-

sophic SuperHyperStrongly Diamond search Edge
Step 3. (Neutrosophic Model) There are some specific Neutrosophic models, 792
which are well-known and they’ve got the names, and some general Neutrosophic 793
models. The moves and the Neutrosophic traces of the cancer on the complex 794
tracks and between complicated groups of cells could be fantasized by a 795
Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath(-/SuperHyperStrongly Diamond search Edge, 796
SuperHyperStar, SuperHyperBipartite, SuperHyperMultipartite, 797
SuperHyperWheel). The aim is to find either the Neutrosophic SuperHyperStrongly 798
Diamond search Edge or the Neutrosophic SuperHyperStrongly Diamond search Edge in those 799
Neutrosophic Neutrosophic SuperHyperModels. 800
7 Case 1: The Initial Neutrosophic Steps 801
Toward Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite as 802
Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel 803
Step 4. (Neutrosophic Solution) In the Neutrosophic Figure (42), the 804
Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite is Neutrosophic highlighted and Neutrosophic 805
featured. 806
By using the Neutrosophic Figure (42) and the Table (21), the Neutrosophic 807
SuperHyperBipartite is obtained. 808
The obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, by the Neutrosophic Algorithm in 809
previous Neutrosophic result, of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of the 810
connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E), in the Neutrosophic 811
SuperHyperModel (42), is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperStrongly Diamond search Edge. 812
USA
USA
Edges Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite
Figure 43. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite Associated to the Notions of

Neutrosophic SuperHyperStrongly Diamond search Edge
8 Case 2: The Increasing Neutrosophic Steps 813
Toward Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite as 814
Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel 815
Step 4. (Neutrosophic Solution) In the Neutrosophic Figure (43), the 816
Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite is Neutrosophic highlighted and 817
Neutrosophic featured. 818
By using the Neutrosophic Figure (43) and the Table (22), the Neutrosophic 819
SuperHyperMultipartite is obtained. 820
The obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, by the Neutrosophic Algorithm in 821
previous result, of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of the connected 822
Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite ESHM : (V, E), in the Neutrosophic 823
SuperHyperModel (43), is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperStrongly Diamond search Edge. 824
Edges Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite
USA
USA
9 Neutrosophic Applications in Cancer’s 825
Neutrosophic Recognition 826
Cancer is a neutrosophic disease, but the neutrosophic model is supposed to understand 827
what is going on in this neutrosophic phenomenon. The special case of neutrosophic 828
disease is considered and some parameters have been used as consequences of the model. 829
Cells are subject to attack by the disease, but the movements of the cancer in the 830
specific area is a matter of mind. Neutrosophic diagnosis of cancer can help in finding 831
some Neutrosophic cures for this Neutrosophic disease. 832
In the following, several Neutrosophic stages are designed for this disease. 833
Step 1. (Neutrosophic Definition) Neutrosophic diagnosis of cancer in long-term 834
Neutrosophic performance. 835
Step 2. (Neutrosophic Issue) The specific region is assigned by the Neutrosophic 836
model (called Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph) and the long Neutrosophic cycle of 837
movement of cancer is identified by this scientific research. Sometimes the 838
movement of cancer is not easy to detect, because there is certainty, uncertainty 839
and neutrality about the movements and effects of cancer on that area. This event 840
leads us to choose another model [which is said to be the Neutrosophic 841
superhypergraph] in order to have a proper understanding of what happened and 842
was done. 843
Step 3. (Neutrosophic Model) There are some specific Neutrosophic models that 844
are well known and have names and some general Neutrosophic models. Cancer 845
neurtosophic movements and effects in complex pathways and between complex 846
groups of cells can be visualized by a SuperHyperPath (-/SuperHyperCycle, 847
SuperHyperStar, SuperHyperBipartite, SuperHyperMultipartite, 848
SuperHyperWheel). The goal is to find dominant neutrosophic Strongly Diamond 849
search Edge models or dominant sStrongly Diamond search Edge models. 850
10 Wondering Open Problems But As The 851
Directions To Forming The Motivations 852
In what follows, some “problems” and some “questions” are proposed. 853
The SuperHyperStrongly Diamond search Edge and the Neutrosophic SuperHyperStrongly 854
Diamond search Edge are defined on a real-world application, titled “Cancer’s Recognitions”. 855
Question 10.1. Which the else SuperHyperModels could be defined based on Cancer’s 856
recognitions? 857
Question 10.2. Are there some SuperHyperNotions related to SuperHyperStrongly Diamond 858
and the Neutrosophic SuperHyperStrongly Diamond search Edge?

search Edge 859
Question 10.3. Are there some Algorithms to be defined on the SuperHyperModels to 860
compute them? 861
Question 10.4. Which the SuperHyperNotions are related to beyond the 862
SuperHyperStrongly Diamond search Edge and the Neutrosophic SuperHyperStrongly Diamond search Edge? 863
Problem 10.5. The SuperHyperStrongly Diamond search Edge and the Neutrosophic 864
SuperHyperStrongly Diamond search Edge do a SuperHyperModel for the Cancer’s recognitions and 865
they’re based on SuperHyperStrongly Diamond search Edge, are there else? 866
USA
USA
Problem 10.6. Which the fundamental SuperHyperNumbers are related to these 867
SuperHyperNumbers types-results? 868
Problem 10.7. What’s the independent research based on Cancer’s recognitions 869
concerning the multiple types of SuperHyperNotions? 870
11 Conclusion and Closing Remarks 871
In this section, closing and concluding remarks are presented. The drawbacks of this 872
scientific research are shown. Some advantages and disadvantages of this scientific 873
research are highlighted. 874
This scientific research uses some approaches to further understand the Neutrosophic 875
SuperHyperGraphs. In this effort, two SuperHyperNotions are defined on the Strongly 876
Diamond search Edge. For this reason, in the second definition, the original definition 877
of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph is redefined on the position of the alphabets. 878
Based on the new Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph definition, the new 879
SuperHyperNotion, Neutrosophic Strongly Diamond search Edge, finds a suitable 880
background to implement some results on. Some SuperHyperClasses and some 881
Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses are the subjects of this scientific research on modeling 882
areas that are subject to cancer attacks in order to recognize this disease as mentioned 883
under the title “Cancer Diagnosis”. To formalize the SuperHyperNotion, Strongly 884
Diamond search Edge, SuperHyperClasses and new SuperHyperClasses instances are 885
introduced. Some general results are summarized in the Strongly Diamond search Edge 886
and Neutrosophic Strongly Diamond search Edge sections. Clarifications, examples, and 887
literature reviews go all the way. In this scientific research, the literature review has met 888
the lines containing concepts and results. SuperHyperGraph and Neutrosophic 889
SuperHyperGraph are super-hypermodels in “cancer diagnosis” and both are the 890
foundation of the background of this scientific research. Sometimes cancer has occurred 891
in an area full of cells, cell groups, and embedded styles. In this section, 892
SuperHyperModel proposes SuperHyperNotions, formally called “Strongly Diamond 893
search Edge”, based on the connections of Cancer’s movements in the longest and 894
strongest styles with the formation of design and architecture, in terms of terms and 895
whispering words. . The “SuperHyper” prefix refers to the topic of embedded styles to 896
explore the background of SuperHyperNotions. In the table (23), the advantages and
Table 23. A look at this scientific research and beyond

Advantages Limitations
1. Redefining the Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 1. General Results
2. Strongly Diamond search Edge
3. Neutrosophic Strongly Diamond search Edge 2. Other SuperHyperNumbers
4. modeling cancer diagnoses
5. SuperHyperClasses 3. SuperHyperFamilies
897
ways of this scientific research are specified, pointed out and expressed. 898
USA
USA
12 Background 899
There are some scientific researches covering the topic of this scientific research. In what 900
follows, there are some discussion and literature reviews about them. 901
The seminal paper and groundbreaking article is titled “New Ideas In Recognition of 902
Cancer And Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph As Hyper Tool On Super Toot” in Ref. [1] 903
by Henry Garrett (2023). In this research article, a novel approach is implemented on 904
SuperHyperGraph and neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph based on general forms with 905
introducing used neutrosophic classes of neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. It’s published 906
in prestigious and fancy journal is entitled “Current Trends in Mass Communication 907
(CTMC)” with ISO abbreviation “Curr Trends Mass Comm” in volume 2 and issue 1 908
with pages 32-55. 909
The seminal paper and groundbreaking article is titled “Some Super Hyper Degrees 910
and Co-Super Hyper Degrees on Neutrosophic Super Hyper Graphs And Super Hyper 911
Graphs Alongside Applications in Cancer’s Treatments” in Ref. [2] by Henry Garrett 912
(2023). In this research article, a novel approach is implemented on SuperHyperGraph 913
and neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph based on fundamental notions and using vital tools 914
in Cancer’s Treatments. It’s published in prestigious and fancy journal is entitled 915
“Journal of Mathematical Techniques and Computational Mathematics(JMTCM)” with 916
ISO abbreviation “J Math Techniques Comput Math” in volume 2 and issue 1 with 917
pages 35-47. The research article studies deeply with choosing directly neutrosophic 918
SuperHyperGraph and SuperHyperGraph. It’s the breakthrough toward independent 919
results based on initial background and fundamental SuperHyperNumbers. 920
The seminal paper and groundbreaking article is titled “A Research on Cancer’s 921
Recognition and Neutrosophic Super Hypergraph by Eulerian Super Hyper Cycles and 922
Hamiltonian Sets as Hyper Covering Versus Super separations” in Ref. [3] by Henry 923
Garrett (2023). In this research article, a novel approach is implemented on 924
SuperHyperGraph and neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph based on fundamental notions 925
and using vital tools in Cancer’s Recognition. It’s published in prestigious and fancy 926
journal is entitled “Journal of Mathematical Techniques and Computational 927
Mathematics(JMTCM)” with ISO abbreviation “J Math Techniques Comput Math” in 928
volume 2 and issue 3 with pages 136-148. The research article studies deeply with 929
choosing directly neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph and SuperHyperGraph. It’s the 930
breakthrough toward independent results based on initial background and fundamental 931
SuperHyperNumbers. 932
The seminal paper and groundbreaking article is titled “Neutrosophic 1-Failed 933
SuperHyperForcing in the SuperHyperFunction to Use Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs 934
on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition and Beyond ” in Ref. [4] by Henry Garrett (2023). 935
In this research article, a novel approach is implemented on SuperHyperGraph and 936
neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph based on fundamental SuperHyperNumber and using 937
neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses of neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. It’s published in 938
prestigious and fancy journal is entitled “Journal of Mathematical Techniques and 939
Computational Mathematics(JMTCM)” with ISO abbreviation “J Math Techniques 940
Comput Math” in volume 2 and issue 6 with pages 221-307. The research article studies 941
deeply with choosing directly neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph and SuperHyperGraph. 942
It’s the breakthrough toward independent results based on initial background and 943
fundamental SuperHyperNumbers. The seminal paper and groundbreaking article is 944
titled “New Ideas in Recognition of Cancer and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph by 945
Initial Eulerian-Path-Cut as Hyper Initial Eulogy on Super Initial EULA” in Ref. [5] by 946
Henry Garrett (2023). In this research article, a novel approach is implemented on 947
SuperHyperGraph and neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph based on fundamental 948
SuperHyperNumber and using neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses of neutrosophic 949
SuperHyperGraph. It’s published in prestigious and fancy journal is entitled 950
USA
USA
“International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics Research” with ISO 951
abbreviation “IJPAMR” in volume 3 and issue 2 with pages 60-88 and doi: 952
10.51483/IJPAMR.3.2.2023.60-88. The seminal paper and groundbreaking article is 953
titled “New Ideas in Recognition of Cancer and Neutrosophic Super Hyper Graph by 954
Eulerian-Path-Cut as Hyper Eulogy-Path-Cut on Super EULA-Path-Cut” in Ref. [6] by 955
SuperHyperGraph. It’s published in prestigious and fancy journal is entitled 959
“International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics Research” with ISO 960
abbreviation “IJPAMR” in volume 3 and issue 2 with pages 102-124 and doi: 961
10.51483/IJPAMR.3.2.2023.102-124. The research article studies deeply with choosing 962
directly neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph and SuperHyperGraph. It’s the breakthrough 963
toward independent results based on initial background and fundamental 964
SuperHyperNumbers. The seminal paper and groundbreaking article is titled “Super 965
Hyper Dominating and Super Hyper Resolving on Neutrosophic Super Hyper Graphs and 966
Their Directions in Game Theory and Neutrosophic Super Hyper Classes” in Ref. [7] by 967
SuperHyperGraph. It’s published in prestigious and fancy journal is entitled “Journal 971
of Mathematical Techniques and Computational Mathematics(JMTCM)” with ISO 972
abbreviation “J Math Techniques Comput Math” in volume 1 and issue 3 with pages 973
242-263. The research article studies deeply with choosing directly neutrosophic 974
SuperHyperGraph and SuperHyperGraph. It’s the breakthrough toward independent 975
results based on initial background and fundamental SuperHyperNumbers. The seminal 976
paper and groundbreaking article is titled “neutrosophic co-degree and neutrosophic 977
degree alongside chromatic numbers in the setting of some classes related to neutrosophic 978
hypergraphs” in Ref. [8] by Henry Garrett (2023). In this research article, a novel 979
approach is implemented on SuperHyperGraph and neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 980
based on general forms without using neutrosophic classes of neutrosophic 981
SuperHyperGraph. It’s published in prestigious and fancy journal is entitled “Journal 982
of Current Trends in Computer Science Research (JCTCSR)” with ISO abbreviation “J 983
Curr Trends Comp Sci Res” in volume 2 and issue 1 with pages 16-24. The research 984
article studies deeply with choosing neutrosophic hypergraphs instead of neutrosophic 985
SuperHyperGraph. It’s the breakthrough toward independent results based on initial 986
background. The research article studies deeply with choosing neutrosophic 987
hypergraphs instead of neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. It’s the breakthrough toward 988
independent results based on initial background. In some articles are titled “0039 — 989
Closing Numbers and Super-Closing Numbers as (Dual)Resolving and (Dual)Coloring 990
alongside (Dual)Dominating in (Neutrosophic)n-SuperHyperGraph” in Ref. [9] by 991
Henry Garrett (2022), “0049 — (Failed)1-Zero-Forcing Number in Neutrosophic Graphs” 992
in Ref. [10] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Extreme SuperHyperClique as the Firm Scheme 993
of Confrontation under Cancer’s Recognition as the Model in The Setting of 994
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [11] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Uncertainty 995
On The Act And Effect Of Cancer Alongside The Foggy Positions Of Cells Toward 996
Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperClique inside Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Titled 997
Cancer’s Recognition” in Ref. [12] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Neutrosophic Version Of 998
Separates Groups Of Cells In Cancer’s Recognition On Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs” 999
in Ref. [13] by Henry Garrett (2022), “The Shift Paradigm To Classify Separately The 1000
Cells and Affected Cells Toward The Totality Under Cancer’s Recognition By New 1001
Multiple Definitions On the Sets Polynomials Alongside Numbers In The (Neutrosophic) 1002
SuperHyperMatching Theory Based on SuperHyperGraph and Neutrosophic 1003
USA
USA
SuperHyperGraph” in Ref. [14] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Breaking the Continuity and 1004
Uniformity of Cancer In The Worst Case of Full Connections With Extreme Failed 1005
SuperHyperClique In Cancer’s Recognition Applied in (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” 1006
in Ref. [15] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperStable as the 1007
Survivors on the Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition Based on Uncertainty to All Modes 1008
in Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [16] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Extremism 1009
of the Attacked Body Under the Cancer’s Circumstances Where Cancer’s Recognition 1010
Titled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [17] by Henry Garrett (2022), 1011
“(Neutrosophic) 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in Cancer’s Recognitions And 1012
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [18] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Neutrosophic 1013
Messy-Style SuperHyperGraphs To Form Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable To Act on 1014
Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognitions In Special ViewPoints” in Ref. [19] by Henry 1015
Garrett (2022), “Neutrosophic 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in the SuperHyperFunction 1016
To Use Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition And 1017
Beyond ” in Ref. [20] by Henry Garrett (2022), “(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperStable on 1018
Cancer’s Recognition by Well- SuperHyperModelled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs ” 1019
in Ref. [21] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Neutrosophic Messy-Style SuperHyperGraphs To 1020
Form Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable To Act on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognitions In 1021
Special ViewPoints” in Ref. [17] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Basic Notions on 1022
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperForcing And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling in Cancer’s 1023
Recognitions And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [22] by Henry Garrett 1024
(2022), “Neutrosophic Messy-Style SuperHyperGraphs To Form Neutrosophic 1025
SuperHyperStable To Act on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognitions In Special ViewPoints” 1026
in Ref. [23] by Henry Garrett (2022),“(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling of Cancer’s 1027
Recognitions Featuring (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperAlliances” in 1028
Ref. [24] by Henry Garrett (2022), “(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperAlliances With 1029
SuperHyperDefensive and SuperHyperOffensive Type-SuperHyperSet On (Neutrosophic) 1030
SuperHyperGraph With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling of Cancer’s Recognitions 1031
And Related (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperClasses” in Ref. [25] by Henry Garrett (2022), 1032
“SuperHyperGirth on SuperHyperGraph and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph With 1033
SuperHyperModeling of Cancer’s Recognitions” in Ref. [26] by Henry Garrett (2022), 1034
“Some SuperHyperDegrees and Co-SuperHyperDegrees on Neutrosophic 1035
SuperHyperGraphs and SuperHyperGraphs Alongside Applications in Cancer’s 1036
Treatments” in Ref. [27] by Henry Garrett (2022), “SuperHyperDominating and 1037
SuperHyperResolving on Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs And Their Directions in 1038
Game Theory and Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses” in Ref. [28] by Henry Garrett 1039
(2022), “SuperHyperMatching By (R-)Definitions And Polynomials To Monitor 1040
Cancer’s Recognition In Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [279] by Henry 1041
Garrett (2023), “The Focus on The Partitions Obtained By Parallel Moves In The 1042
Cancer’s Extreme Recognition With Different Types of Extreme SuperHyperMatching Set 1043
and Polynomial on (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [280] by Henry Garrett 1044
(2023), “Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique Decides the Failures on the Cancer’s 1045
Recognition in the Perfect Connections of Cancer’s Attacks By SuperHyperModels 1046
Named (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [281] by Henry Garrett (2023), 1047
“Indeterminacy On The All Possible Connections of Cells In Front of Cancer’s Attacks 1048
In The Terms of Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperClique on Cancer’s Recognition called 1049
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [282] by Henry Garrett (2023), “Perfect 1050
Directions Toward Idealism in Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition Forwarding 1051
Neutrosophic SuperHyperClique on Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [285] by 1052
Henry Garrett (2023), “Demonstrating Complete Connections in Every Embedded 1053
Regions and Sub-Regions in the Terms of Cancer’s Recognition and (Neutrosophic) 1054
SuperHyperGraphs With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperClique” in Ref. [286] by Henry 1055
Garrett (2023), “Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic Regions titled 1056
USA
USA
neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperStable in Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition modeled in 1057
the Form of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [289] by Henry Garrett (2023), 1058
“Using the Tool As (Neutrosophic) Failed SuperHyperStable To SuperHyperModel 1059
Cancer’s Recognition Titled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [292] by Henry 1060
Garrett (2023), “Neutrosophic Messy-Style SuperHyperGraphs To Form Neutrosophic 1061
SuperHyperStable To Act on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognitions In Special ViewPoints” 1062
in Ref. [293] by Henry Garrett (2023), “(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperStable on Cancer’s 1063
Recognition by Well-SuperHyperModelled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in 1064
Ref. [294] by Henry Garrett (2023), “Neutrosophic 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in the 1065
SuperHyperFunction To Use Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs on Cancer’s Neutrosophic 1066
Recognition And Beyond ” in Ref. [295] by Henry Garrett (2022), “(Neutrosophic) 1067
1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in Cancer’s Recognitions And (Neutrosophic) 1068
SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [296] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Basic Notions on 1069
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperForcing And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling in Cancer’s 1070
Recognitions And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [297] by Henry Garrett 1071
(2022), “Basic Neutrosophic Notions Concerning SuperHyperDominating and 1072
Neutrosophic SuperHyperResolving in SuperHyperGraph” in Ref. [308] by Henry 1073
Garrett (2022), “Initial Material of Neutrosophic Preliminaries to Study Some 1074
Neutrosophic Notions Based on Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) in Neutrosophic 1075
SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)” in Ref. [309] by Henry Garrett (2022), and [4–309], there 1076
are some endeavors to formalize the basic SuperHyperNotions about neutrosophic 1077
SuperHyperGraph and SuperHyperGraph alongside scientific research books 1078
at [310–463]. Two popular scientific research books in Scribd in the terms of high 1079
readers, 5679 and 6667 respectively, on neutrosophic science is on [464, 465]. 1080
Some scientific studies and scientific researches about neutrosophic graphs, are 1081
proposed as book in Ref. [464] by Henry Garrett (2023) which is indexed by Google 1082
Scholar and has more than 5679 readers in Scribd. It’s titled “Beyond Neutrosophic 1083
Graphs” and published by Dr. Henry Garrett. This research book covers different types 1084
of notions and settings in neutrosophic graph theory and neutrosophic 1085
SuperHyperGraph theory. 1086
Also, some scientific studies and scientific researches about neutrosophic graphs, are 1087
proposed as book in Ref. [465] by Henry Garrett (2023) which is indexed by Google 1088
Scholar and has more than 6667 readers in Scribd. It’s titled “Neutrosophic Duality” 1089
and published by Dr. Henry Garrett. This research book presents different types of 1090
notions SuperHyperResolving and SuperHyperDominating in the setting of duality in 1091
neutrosophic graph theory and neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph theory. This research 1092
book has scrutiny on the complement of the intended set and the intended set, 1093
simultaneously. It’s smart to consider a set but acting on its complement that what’s 1094
done in this research book which is popular in the terms of high readers in Scribd. 1095
See the seminal scientific researches [1–3]. The formalization of the notions on the 1096
framework of notions in SuperHyperGraphs, Neutrosophic notions in 1097
SuperHyperGraphs theory, and (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs theory at [4–309] 1098
alongside scientific research books at [310–463]. Two popular scientific research books 1099
in Scribd ,in the terms of high readers, 5679 and 6667 respectively, on neutrosophic 1100
science is on [464, 465]. 1101
References 1102
1. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Recognition of Cancer And Neutrosophic 1103
SuperHyperGraph As Hyper Tool On Super Toot”, Curr Trends Mass Comm 1104
2(1) (2023) 32-55. (doi: 10.33140/CTMC.02.01.03). 1105
USA
USA
2. Henry Garrett, “Some Super Hyper Degrees and Co-Super Hyper Degrees on 1106
Neutrosophic Super Hyper Graphs And Super Hyper Graphs Alongside 1107
Applications in Cancer’s Treatments”, J Math Techniques Comput Math 2(1) 1108
(2023) 35-47. (doi: 10.33140/JMTCM.02.01.05). 1109
3. Henry Garrett, “A Research on Cancer’s Recognition and Neutrosophic Super 1110
Hypergraph by Eulerian Super Hyper Cycles and Hamiltonian Sets as Hyper 1111
Covering Versus Super separations”, J Math Techniques Comput Math 2(3) 1112
(2023) 136-148. (doi: 10.33140/JMTCM.02.03.03). 1113
4. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in the 1114
SuperHyperFunction to Use Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs on Cancer’s 1115
Neutrosophic Recognition and Beyond ”, J Math Techniques Comput Math 2(6) 1116
(2023) 221-307. (doi: 10.33140/JMTCM.02.06.04). 1117
5. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas in Recognition of Cancer and Neutrosophic 1118
SuperHyperGraph by Initial Eulerian-Path-Cut as Hyper Initial Eulogy on Super 1119
Initial EULA”, International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics 1120
Research 3(2) (2023) 60-88. (doi: 10.51483/IJPAMR.3.2.2023.60-88). 1121
6. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas in Recognition of Cancer and Neutrosophic Super 1122
Hyper Graph by Eulerian-Path-Cut as Hyper Eulogy-Path-Cut on Super 1123
EULA-Path-Cut”, International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics 1124
Research 3(2) (2023) 102-124. (doi: 10.51483/IJPAMR.3.2.2023.102-124). 1125
7. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas in Recognition of Cancer and Neutrosophic Super 1126
Hyper Graph by Eulerian-Path-Cut as Hyper Eulogy-Path-Cut on Super 1127
EULA-Path-Cut”, J Curr Trends Comp Sci Res 2(1) (2023) 16-24. (doi: 1128
10.33140/JCTCSR.02.01.04) 1129
8. Henry Garrett, “Super Hyper Dominating and Super Hyper Resolving on 1130
Neutrosophic Super Hyper Graphs and Their Directions in Game Theory and 1131
Neutrosophic Super Hyper Classes”, J Math Techniques Comput Math 1(3) 1132
(2022) 242-263. (doi: 10.33140/JMTCM.01.03.09) 1133
9. Garrett, Henry. “0039 — Closing Numbers and Super-Closing Numbers as 1134
(Dual)Resolving and (Dual)Coloring alongside (Dual)Dominating in 1135
(Neutrosophic)n-SuperHyperGraph.” CERN European Organization for Nuclear 1136
Research - Zenodo, Nov. 2022. CERN European Organization for Nuclear 1137
Research, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6319942. 1138
https://oa.mg/work/10.5281/zenodo.6319942 1139
10. Garrett, Henry. “0049 — (Failed)1-Zero-Forcing Number in Neutrosophic 1140
Graphs.” CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research - Zenodo, Feb. 1141
2022. CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research, 1142
https://doi.org/10.13140/rg.2.2.35241.26724. 1143
https://oa.mg/work/10.13140/rg.2.2.35241.26724 1144
11. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperClique as the Firm Scheme of 1145
Confrontation under Cancer’s Recognition as the Model in The Setting of 1146
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2023010308 (doi: 1147
10.20944/preprints202301.0308.v1). 1148
12. Henry Garrett, “Uncertainty On The Act And Effect Of Cancer Alongside The 1149
Foggy Positions Of Cells Toward Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperClique inside 1150
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Titled Cancer’s Recognition”, Preprints 2023, 1151
2023010282 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0282.v1). 1152
USA
USA
13. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Version Of Separates Groups Of Cells In 1153
Cancer’s Recognition On Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 1154
2023010267 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0267.v1). 1155
14. Henry Garrett, “The Shift Paradigm To Classify Separately The Cells and 1156
Affected Cells Toward The Totality Under Cancer’s Recognition By New 1157
Multiple Definitions On the Sets Polynomials Alongside Numbers In The 1158
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperMatching Theory Based on SuperHyperGraph and 1159
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph”, Preprints 2023, 2023010265 (doi: 1160
10.20944/preprints202301.0265.v1). 1161
15. Henry Garrett, “Breaking the Continuity and Uniformity of Cancer In The 1162
Worst Case of Full Connections With Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique In 1163
Cancer’s Recognition Applied in (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 1164
2023, 2023010262,(doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0262.v1). 1165
16. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperStable as the Survivors on the 1166
Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition Based on Uncertainty to All Modes in 1167
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2023010240 (doi: 1168
10.20944/preprints202301.0240.v1). 1169
17. Henry Garrett, “Extremism of the Attacked Body Under the Cancer’s 1170
Circumstances Where Cancer’s Recognition Titled (Neutrosophic) 1171
SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2023010224, (doi: 1172
10.20944/preprints202301.0224.v1). 1173
18. Henry Garrett, “(Neutrosophic) 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in Cancer’s 1174
Recognitions And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 1175
2023010105 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0105.v1). 1176
19. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Messy-Style SuperHyperGraphs To Form 1177
Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable To Act on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognitions 1178
In Special ViewPoints”, Preprints 2023, 2023010088 (doi: 1179
10.20944/preprints202301.0088.v1). 1180
SuperHyperFunction To Use Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs on Cancer’s 1182
Neutrosophic Recognition And Beyond ”, Preprints 2023, 2023010044 1183
21. Henry Garrett, “(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperStable on Cancer’s Recognition by 1184
Well- SuperHyperModelled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 1185
2023010043 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0043.v1). 1186
22. Henry Garrett, “Basic Notions on (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperForcing And 1187
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling in Cancer’s Recognitions And 1188
10.20944/preprints202301.0105.v1). 1190
10.20944/preprints202301.0088.v1). 1194
24. Henry Garrett, “(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling of Cancer’s Recognitions 1195
Featuring (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperAlliances”, Preprints 1196
2022, 2022120549 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202212.0549.v1). 1197
USA
USA
25. Henry Garrett, “(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperAlliances With SuperHyperDefensive 1198
and SuperHyperOffensive Type-SuperHyperSet On (Neutrosophic) 1199
SuperHyperGraph With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling of Cancer’s 1200
Recognitions And Related (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperClasses”, Preprints 2022, 1201
2022120540 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202212.0540.v1). 1202
26. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperGirth on SuperHyperGraph and Neutrosophic 1203
SuperHyperGraph With SuperHyperModeling of Cancer’s Recognitions”, 1204
Preprints 2022, 2022120500 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202212.0500.v1). 1205
27. Henry Garrett, “Some SuperHyperDegrees and Co-SuperHyperDegrees on 1206
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs and SuperHyperGraphs Alongside Applications 1207
in Cancer’s Treatments”, Preprints 2022, 2022120324 (doi: 1208
10.20944/preprints202212.0324.v1). 1209
28. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperDominating and SuperHyperResolving on 1210
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs And Their Directions in Game Theory and 1211
Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses”, Preprints 2022, 2022110576 (doi: 1212
10.20944/preprints202211.0576.v1). 1213
29. Henry Garrett, “Star and Wheel on Recognition of Cancer and Neutrosophic 1214
SuperHyperGraph with a Specific Type of Independency of 1215
SuperHyperVertices”, Preprints 2024, , 2024020663 (doi: 1216
10.20944/preprints202402.0663.v1). 1217
30. Henry Garrett, ”New Ideas In Recognition of Cancer And Neutrosophic 1218
SuperHyperGraph With Star and Wheel By Triangle-free search Edge”, Zenodo 1219
2024, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.13909326). 1220
SuperHyperGraph With Bipartite and Path By Triangle-free search Edge”, 1222
Zenodo 2024, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.13893734). 1223
SuperHyperGraph With Multipartite and Cycle By Triangle-free search Edge”, 1225
SuperHyperGraph With Star and Wheel By Diamond search”, Zenodo 2024, 1228
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.13834065). 1229
SuperHyperGraph With Bipartite and Path By Diamond search”, Zenodo 2024, 1231
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.13826744). 1232
SuperHyperGraph With Multipartite and Cycle By Diamond search”, Zenodo 1234
2024, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.13823150). 1235
SuperHyperGraph With Star and Wheel By Triangle-free search”, Zenodo 2024, 1237
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.13748678). 1238
SuperHyperGraph With Bipartite and Path By Triangle-free search”, Zenodo 1240
2024, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.13629264). 1241
USA
USA
SuperHyperGraph With Multipartite and Cycle By Triangle-free search”, 1243
SuperHyperGraph With Star and Wheel By Edge Cover”, Zenodo 2024, (doi: 1246
10.5281/zenodo.13457634). 1247
SuperHyperGraph With Bipartite and Path By Edge Cover”, Zenodo 2024, (doi: 1249
10.5281/zenodo.13447621). 1250
SuperHyperGraph With Multipartite and Cycle By Edge Cover”, Zenodo 2024, 1252
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.13386125). 1253
SuperHyperGraph With Star and Wheel By Vertex Cover”, Zenodo 2024, (doi: 1255
10.5281/zenodo.13359880). 1256
SuperHyperGraph With Bipartite and Path By Vertex Cover”, Zenodo 2024, 1258
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.13359103). 1259
SuperHyperGraph With Multipartite and Cycle By Vertex Cover”, Zenodo 2024, 1261
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.13329472). 1262
SuperHyperGraph With Multipartite and Cycle By Burning Number From 1264
Graph Searching”, Zenodo 2024, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.13091499). 1265
SuperHyperGraph With Bipartite and Path By Burning Number From Graph 1267
Searching”, Zenodo 2024, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.13134329). 1268
SuperHyperGraph With Star and Wheel By Burning Number From Graph 1270
SuperHyperGraph With Star and Wheel By Zero Forcing From Graph 1273
SuperHyperGraph With Bipartite and Path By Zero Forcing”, Zenodo 2024, 1276
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.12752339). 1277
SuperHyperGraph With Multipartite and Cycle By Zero Forcing”, Zenodo 2024, 1279
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.12738172). 1280
SuperHyperGraph With Star and Wheel By Connected Perfect Dual 1282
Domination”, Zenodo 2024, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.12680424). 1283
SuperHyperGraph With Bipartite and Path By Connected Perfect Dual 1285
USA
USA
SuperHyperGraph With Multipartite and Cycle By Connected Perfect Dual 1288
SuperHyperGraph With Star and Wheel By Stable Perfect Dual Domination”, 1291
SuperHyperGraph With Bipartite and Path By Stable Perfect Dual 1294
SuperHyperGraph With Multipartite and Cycle By Stable Perfect Dual 1297
SuperHyperGraph With Star and Wheel By Perfect Dual Domination”, Zenodo 1300
2024, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.12174846). 1301
SuperHyperGraph With Bipartite and Path By Perfect Dual Domination”, 1303
SuperHyperGraph With Multipartite and Cycle By Perfect Dual Domination”, 1306
SuperHyperGraph With Star and Wheel By Connected Dual Domination”, 1309
SuperHyperGraph With Bipartite and Path By Connected Dual Domination”, 1312
SuperHyperGraph With Multipartite and Cycle By Connected Dual 1315
SuperHyperGraph With Star and Wheel By Stable Dual Domination”, Zenodo 1318
2024, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.11513482). 1319
SuperHyperGraph With Bipartite and Path By Stable Dual Domination”, 1321
SuperHyperGraph With Multipartite and Cycle By Stable Dual Domination”, 1324
SuperHyperGraph With Star and Wheel By Simple Dual Domination”, Zenodo 1327
2024, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.11253553). 1328
SuperHyperGraph With Bipartite and Path By Simple Dual Domination”, 1330
USA
USA
SuperHyperGraph With Multipartite and Cycle By Simple Dual Domination”, 1333
SuperHyperGraph With Star and Wheel By Stable Perfect Domination”, 1336
SuperHyperGraph With Bipartite and Path By Stable Perfect Domination”, 1339
SuperHyperGraph With Multipartite and Cycle By Stable Perfect Domination”, 1342
SuperHyperGraph With Star and Wheel By Total Perfect Domination”, Zenodo 1345
2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.10929590). 1346
SuperHyperGraph With Bipartite and Path By Total Perfect Domination”, 1348
SuperHyperGraph With Multipartite and Cycle By Total Perfect Domination”, 1351
SuperHyperGraph With Star and Wheel By Perfect Domination”, Zenodo 2023, 1354
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.10899659). 1355
SuperHyperGraph With Bipartite and Path By Perfect Domination”, Zenodo 1357
2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.10895887). 1358
SuperHyperGraph With Multipartite and Cycle By Perfect Domination”, 1360
SuperHyperGraph With Counterproposal Star and Counteroffer Wheel By 1363
Counterargument Stable Sequence As Hyper Findings On Super Gatherings”, 1364
SuperHyperGraph With Counterproposal Bipartite and Counteroffer Path By 1367
Counterargument Stable Sequence As Hyper Findings On Super Gatherings”, 1368
SuperHyperGraph With Counterproposal Multipartite and Counteroffer Cycle 1371
By Counterargument Stable Sequence As Hyper Findings On Super 1372
Gatherings”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.10640905). 1373
SuperHyperGraph With Star and Wheel By Strongly Resolving Sequence As 1375
Hyper Decoration On Super Density”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1376
10.13140/RG.2.2.17389.97769). 1377
USA
USA
SuperHyperGraph With Bipartite and Path By Strongly Resolving Sequence As 1379
Hyper Decoration On Super Density”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1380
10.13140/RG.2.2.28685.10727). 1381
SuperHyperGraph With Multipartite and Cycle By Strongly Resolving Sequence 1383
As Hyper Decoration On Super Density”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1384
10.13140/RG.2.2.24994.20169). 1385
SuperHyperGraph With Star and Wheel By Dominating Sequence As Hyper 1387
Decoration On Super Density”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.10371529). 1388
SuperHyperGraph With Bipartite and Path By Dominating Sequence As Hyper 1390
SuperHyperGraph With Multipartite and Cycle By Dominating Sequence As 1393
Hyper Decoration On Super Density”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 1394
10.5281/zenodo.10263440). 1395
SuperHyperGraph With Star and Wheel By STABLE As Hyper Decoration On 1397
Super Density”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.10028600). 1398
SuperHyperGraph With Bipartite and Path By STABLE As Hyper Decoration 1400
On Super Density”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8310454). 1401
89. Henry Garrett, “Recognition of Cancer With Bipartite and Path as 1402
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph By the Tool Called Stability”, Preprints 2023, 1403
2023081972 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202308.1972.v1). 1404
SuperHyperGraph With Multipartite and Cycle By STABLE As Hyper 1406
SuperHyperGraph With Star and Wheel By REVERSE CONNECTIVE 1409
DOMINATION As Hyper Decoration On Super Density”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 1410
10.5281/zenodo.8206877). 1411
SuperHyperGraph With Bipartite and Path By REVERSE CONNECTIVE 1413
10.5281/zenodo.8206834). 1415
SuperHyperGraph With Multipartite and Cycle By REVERSE CONNECTIVE 1417
10.5281/zenodo.8206773). 1419
SuperHyperGraph With Star and Wheel By EQUAL CONNECTIVE 1421
10.5281/zenodo.8201319). 1423
USA
USA
SuperHyperGraph With Bipartite and Path By EQUAL CONNECTIVE 1425
10.5281/zenodo.8201255). 1427
SuperHyperGraph With Multipartite and Cycle By EQUAL CONNECTIVE 1429
10.5281/zenodo.8201165). 1431
SuperHyperGraph With Star and Wheel By CONNECTIVE DOMINATION As 1433
Hyper Decoration On Super Density”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 1434
10.5281/zenodo.8196147). 1435
SuperHyperGraph With Bipartite and Path By CONNECTIVE DOMINATION 1437
As Hyper Decoration On Super Density”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 1438
10.5281/zenodo.8196132). 1439
SuperHyperGraph With Multipartite and Cycle By CONNECTIVE 1441
10.5281/zenodo.8196099). 1443
SuperHyperGraph With Bipartite and Path By DOMINATION As Hyper 1445
SuperHyperGraph With Star and Wheel By DOMINATION As Hyper 1448
SuperHyperGraph With Multipartite and Cycle By DOMINATION As Hyper 1451
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperPerfect Search As Hyper Perf On Super 1454
Perfidy”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8104836). 1455
104. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Perfidy By Hyper Perf Of 1456
SuperHyperPerfect Search In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1457
SuperHyperGraph”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8104857). 1458
SuperHyperGraph By Reverse Strict Dimension Dominating As Hyper Dimple 1460
On Super Dimity”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8092796). 1461
106. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Dimity By Hyper Dimple Of Reverse 1462
Strict Dimension Dominating In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1463
SuperHyperGraph By Unequal Dimension Dominating As Hyper Dimple On 1466
Super Dimity”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8088438). 1467
USA
USA
108. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Dimity By Hyper Dimple Of Unequal 1468
Dimension Dominating In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1469
SuperHyperGraph By Strict Dimension Dominating As Hyper Dimple On Super 1472
Dimity”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8084436). 1473
110. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Dimity By Hyper Dimple Of Strict 1474
SuperHyperGraph By Reverse Strict Connective As Hyper Conceit On Super 1478
Con”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8080100). 1479
112. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Con By Hyper Conceit Of Reverse Strict 1480
Connective In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, 1481
SuperHyperGraph By Unequal Connective Dominating As Hyper Conceit On 1484
Super Con”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8078445). 1485
114. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Con By Hyper Conceit Of Unequal 1486
Connective Dominating In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1487
SuperHyperGraph By Strict Connective Dominating As Hyper Conceit On 1490
116. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Con By Hyper Conceit Of Strict 1492
SuperHyperGraph By Reverse Dimension Dominating As Hyper Dimple On 1496
Super Dimity”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8072171). 1497
118. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Dimity By Hyper Dimple Of Reverse 1498
SuperHyperGraph By Equal Dimension Dominating As Hyper Dimple On Super 1502
120. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Dimity By Hyper Dimple Of Equal 1504
SuperHyperGraph By Dimension Dominating As Hyper Dimple On Super 1508
122. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Dimity By Hyper Dimple Of Dimension 1510
Dominating In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, 1511
USA
USA
SuperHyperGraph By Reverse Connective Dominating As Hyper Conceit On 1514
124. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Con By Hyper Conceit Of Reverse 1516
SuperHyperGraph By Equal Connective Dominating As Hyper Conceit On 1520
126. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Con By Hyper Conceit Of Equal 1522
SuperHyperGraph By Connective Dominating As Hyper Conceit On Super 1526
Con”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8051346). 1527
128. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Con By Hyper Conceit Of Connective 1528
SuperHyperGraph By United Dominating As Hyper Ultra On Super Units”, 1532
130. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Units By Hyper Ultra Of United 1534
SuperHyperGraph By Zero Forcing As Hyper ford On Super forceps”, Zenodo 1538
2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8017246). 1539
132. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super forceps By Hyper ford Of Zero Forcing In 1540
Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, Zenodo 2023, 1541
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8020128). 1542
SuperHyperGraph By Matrix-Based As Hyper mat On Super matte”, Zenodo 1544
2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7978571). 1545
134. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super mat By Hyper matte Of Matrix-Based In 1546
Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, Zenodo 2023, 1547
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7978857). 1548
SuperHyperGraph By Dominating-Edges As Hyper Dome On Super Eddy”, 1550
136. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Eddy By Hyper Dome Of 1552
Dominating-Edges In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1553
SuperHyperGraph By Edge-Gap As Hyper Gape On Super Gab”, Zenodo 2023, 1556
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7916595). 1557
USA
USA
138. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Gab By Hyper Gape Of Edge-Gap In 1558
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7923632). 1560
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On 1562
Super Nebulous”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7904698). 1563
140. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Nebulous By Hyper Nebbish Of 1564
Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1565
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Decomposition As Hyper 1568
Decompress On Super Decompensation”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 1569
10.5281/zenodo.7904529). 1570
142. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Decompensation By Hyper Decompress Of 1571
Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Decomposition In Cancer’s Recognition With 1572
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 1573
10.5281/zenodo.7904401). 1574
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut As Hyper Nebbish On Super 1576
Nebulous”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7871026). 1577
Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1579
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Cycle-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On Super 1582
Eulerian-Cycle-Neighbor In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1585
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Cycle-Decomposition As Hyper Decompress On 1588
Super Decompensation”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7855661). 1589
Eulerian-Cycle-Decomposition In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1591
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Cycle-Cut As Hyper Eulogy On Super EULA”, 1594
150. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super EULA By Hyper Eulogy Of 1596
Eulerian-Cycle-Cut In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1597
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Type-Path-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On Super 1600
USA
USA
Eulerian-Type-Path-Neighbor In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1603
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Type-Path-Decomposition As Hyper Decompress 1606
On Super Decompensation”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7839333). 1607
Eulerian-Type-Path-Decomposition In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1609
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Type-Path-Cut As Hyper Eulogy On Super 1612
EULA”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7834229). 1613
Eulerian-Type-Path-Cut In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1615
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Path-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On Super 1618
Eulerian-Path-Neighbor In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1621
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Path-Decomposition As Hyper Decompress On 1624
Eulerian-Path-Decomposition In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1627
SuperHyperGraph As Hyper Tool On Super Toot”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 1630
10.5281/zenodo.7812236). 1631
SuperHyperGraph By initial Eulerian-Path-Cut As Hyper initial Eulogy On 1633
Super initial EULA”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7809365). 1634
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Path-Cut As Hyper Eulogy-Path-Cut On Super 1636
EULA-Path-Cut”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7809358). 1637
Eulerian-Path-Cut In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1639
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian-Path-Cut As Hyper Eulogy On Super EULA”, 1642
SuperHyperGraph By Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On 1645
Super Nebulous”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7806767). 1646
USA
USA
Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1648
SuperHyperGraph By Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Decomposition As Hyper 1651
Decompress On Super Decompensation”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 1652
10.5281/zenodo.7804238). 1653
Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Decomposition In Cancer’s Recognition With 1655
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7804228). 1656
SuperHyperGraph By Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Cut As Hyper Hamper On Super 1658
Hammy”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7799902). 1659
171. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Hammy By Hyper Hamper Of 1660
Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Cut In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1661
SuperHyperGraph By Hamiltonian-Cycle-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On Super 1664
SuperHyperGraph By Hamiltonian-Cycle-Decomposition As Hyper Decompress 1667
On Super Decompensation”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7793372). 1668
SuperHyperGraph By Hamiltonian-Cycle-Cut As Hyper Hamper On Super 1670
Hammy”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7791952). 1671
Hamiltonian-Cycle-Cut In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1673
SuperHyperGraph By Hamiltonian-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On Super 1676
Hamiltonian-Neighbor In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1679
SuperHyperGraph By Hamiltonian-Decomposition As Hyper Decompress On 1682
Hamiltonian-Decomposition In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1685
SuperHyperGraph By Hamiltonian-Cut As Hyper Hamper On Super Hammy”, 1688
USA
USA
Hamiltonian-Cut In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1691
SuperHyperGraph By Trace-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On Super Nebulous”, 1694
Trace-Neighbor In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) 1697
184. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic 1699
SuperHyperGraph By Trace-Decomposition As Hyper Decompress On Super 1700
Decompensation”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7771831). 1701
Trace-Decomposition In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1703
SuperHyperGraph By Trace-Cut As Hyper Nebbish On Super Nebulous”, 1706
ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.20913.25446). 1707
187. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Tract By Hyper Track Of Trace-Cut In 1708
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7764916). 1710
SuperHyperGraph By Edge-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On Super Nebulous”, 1712
Edge-Neighbor In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, 1715
SuperHyperGraph By Edge-Decomposition As Hyper Decompress On Super 1718
Decompensation”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.22545.10089). 1719
Edge-Decomposition In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1721
SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.29544.34564). 1722
SuperHyperGraph By Edge-Cut As Hyper Edify On Super Eddy”, ResearchGate 1724
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.11377.76644). 1725
193. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Eddy By Hyper Edify Of Edge-Cut In 1726
Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchGate 1727
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.23750.96329). 1728
SuperHyperGraph By Vertex-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On Super Nebulous”, 1730
Vertex-Neighbor In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1733
USA
USA
SuperHyperGraph By Vertex-Decomposition As Hyper Decompress On Super 1736
Decompensation”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.30212.81289). 1737
Vertex-Decomposition In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1739
SuperHyperGraph By Vertex-Cut As Hyper Vertu On Super Vertigo”, 1742
199. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Vertigo By Hyper Vertu Of Vertex-Cut In 1744
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.32467.25124). 1746
SuperHyperGraph By Stable-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On Super Nebulous”, 1748
201. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Nebulizer By Hyper Nub Of 1750
Stable-Neighbor In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1751
SuperHyperGraph By Stable-Decompositions As Hyper Stain On Super Stagy”, 1754
203. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Stale By Hyper Stalk Of 1756
Stable-Decompositions In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1757
SuperHyperGraph By Stable-Cut As Hyper Stain On Super Stagy”, 1760
205. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Stale By Hyper Stalk Of Stable-Cut In 1762
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.20170.24000). 1764
SuperHyperGraph By Clique-Neighbors As Hyper Nebbish On Super Nebulous”, 1766
207. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Nebulizer By Hyper Nub Of 1768
Clique-Neighbors In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1769
SuperHyperGraph By Clique-Decompositions As Hyper Decompile On Super 1772
Decommission”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.18780.87683). 1773
Clique- Decompositions In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1775
SuperHyperGraph By Clique-Cut As Hyper Click On Super Cliche”, 1778
USA
USA
211. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Cliff By Hyper Cling Of Clique-Cut In 1780
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.27392.30721). 1782
SuperHyperGraph By Space As Hyper Spin On Super Spacy”, ResearchGate 1784
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.33028.40321). 1785
SuperHyperGraph By List- Coloring As Hyper List On Super Lisle”, 1787
214. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Lith By Hyper Lite Of List-Coloring In 1789
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.16356.04489). 1791
SuperHyperGraph By Space As Hyper Sparse On Super Spark ”, ResearchGate 1793
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.21756.21129). 1794
216. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Solidarity By Hyper Soul Of Space In 1795
Cancer’s Recognition With (Extreme) SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchGate 2023, 1796
(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.30983.68009). 1797
SuperHyperGraph By Edge-Connectivity As Hyper Disclosure On Super 1799
Closure”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.28552.29445). 1800
218. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Uniform By Hyper Deformation Of 1801
Edge-Connectivity In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1802
SuperHyperGraph By Vertex-Connectivity As Hyper Leak On Super Structure”, 1805
220. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super System By Hyper Explosions Of 1807
Vertex-Connectivity In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1808
SuperHyperGraph By Tree-Decomposition As Hyper Forward On Super Returns”, 1811
222. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Nodes By Hyper Moves Of 1813
Tree-Decomposition In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1814
SuperHyperGraph By Chord As Hyper Excellence On Super Excess”, 1817
224. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Gap By Hyper Navigations Of Chord In 1819
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.11172.14720). 1821
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyper(i,j)-Domination As Hyper Controller On 1823
Super Waves”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.22011.80165). 1824
USA
USA
226. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Coincidence By Hyper Routes Of 1825
SuperHyper(i,j)-Domination In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1826
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperEdge-Domination As Hyper Reversion On 1829
Super Indirection”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.10493.84962). 1830
228. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Obstacles By Hyper Model Of 1831
SuperHyperEdge-Domination In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1832
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperK-Domination As Hyper k-Actions On Super 1835
Patterns”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.19944.14086). 1836
230. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Harmony By Hyper k-Function Of 1837
SuperHyperK-Domination In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1838
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperK-Number As Hyper k-Partition On Super 1841
Layers”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.33103.76968). 1842
232. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Gradient By Hyper k-Class Of 1843
SuperHyperK-Number In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1844
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperOrder As Hyper Enumerations On Super 1847
Landmarks”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.35646.56641). 1848
234. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Analogous By Hyper Visions Of 1849
SuperHyperOrder In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1850
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperColoring As Hyper Categories On Super 1853
Neighbors”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.13973.81121). 1854
236. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Relations By Hyper Identifications Of 1855
SuperHyperColoring In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1856
237. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Contradiction By Hyper Detection of 1858
SuperHyperDefensive In Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition and Neutrosophic 1859
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperDimension As Hyper Distinguishing On Super 1862
Distances”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.31956.88961). 1863
239. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Locations By Hyper Differing Of 1864
SuperHyperDimension In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1865
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperDominating As Hyper Closing On Super 1868
Messy”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.21510.45125). 1869
USA
USA
241. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Missing By Hyper Searching Of 1870
SuperHyperDominating In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1871
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperConnected As Hyper Group On Super Surge”, 1874
243. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Outbreak By Hyper Collections Of 1876
SuperHyperConnected In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 1877
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperTotal As Hyper Covering On Super Infections”, 1880
245. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Extremism By Hyper Treatments Of 1882
SuperHyperTotal In Cancer’s Recognition with (Neutrosophic) 1883
246. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Isolation By Hyper Perfectness Of 1885
SuperHyperPerfect In Cancer’s Recognition with (Neutrosophic) 1886
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperPerfect As Hyper Idealism On Super Vacancy”, 1889
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperJoin As Hyper Separations On Super Sorts”, 1892
249. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super connections By Hyper disconnections Of 1894
SuperHyperJoin In Cancer’s Recognition with (Neutrosophic) 1895
250. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Mixed-Devastations By Hyper Decisions 1897
Of SuperHyperDuality In Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition and Neutrosophic 1898
251. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition As (Neutrosophic) 1900
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperDuality As Hyper Imaginations On Super 1901
Mixed-Illustrations”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.33275.80161). 1902
252. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition As (Neutrosophic) 1903
SuperHyperGraph By Path SuperHyperColoring As Hyper Correction On Super 1904
Faults”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.30182.50241). 1905
253. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Reflections By Hyper Rotations Of Path 1906
SuperHyperColoring In Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition and Neutrosophic 1907
254. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas As Hyper Deformations On Super Chains In 1909
Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph By 1910
SuperHyperDensity”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.13444.60806). 1911
255. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas As Hyper Ignorance By SuperHyperDensity On 1912
Super Resistances In Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition and Neutrosophic 1913
SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi:10.13140/RG.2.2.16800.05123). 1914
USA
USA
256. Henry Garrett, “New Research On Cancer’s Recognition and Neutrosophic 1915
SuperHyperGraph By Eulerian SuperHyperCycles and Hamiltonian Sets As 1916
Hyper Covering Versus Super separations-VI ”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1917
10.13140/RG.2.2.29913.80482). 1918
Hyper Covering Versus Super separations-V ”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1921
10.13140/RG.2.2.33269.24809). 1922
Hyper Covering Versus Super separations-IV ”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1925
10.13140/RG.2.2.34946.96960). 1926
259. Henry Garrett, “A Research On Cancer’s Recognition and Neutrosophic 1927
Hyper Covering Versus Super separations-III ”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1929
10.13140/RG.2.2.14814.31040). 1930
Hyper Covering Versus Super separations-II ”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1933
10.13140/RG.2.2.15653.17125). 1934
Hyper Covering Versus Super separations-I ”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1937
10.13140/RG.2.2.25719.50089). 1938
262. Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Disruptions In Cancer’s Extreme 1939
Recognition As Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph By Hyper Plans Called 1940
SuperHyperConnectivities”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1941
10.13140/RG.2.2.29441.94562). 1942
263. Henry Garrett, “Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition As Neutrosophic 1943
SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperConnectivities As Hyper Diagnosis On Super 1944
Mechanism”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.17252.24968). 1945
264. Henry Garrett,“Cancer’s Recognition and (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph By 1946
the Criteria of Eulerian and Hamiltonian Type-Sets As Hyper Modified Cycles 1947
On Super Mess”, ResearchGate 2023,(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.16652.59525). 1948
265. Henry Garrett,“Eulerian and Hamiltonian In Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition 1949
and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph On Super Interactions By Hyper Extensions 1950
of Cycles”, ResearchGate 2023,(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.34583.24485). 1951
266. Henry Garrett,“SuperHyperGirth Type-Results on extreme SuperHyperGirth 1952
theory and (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs Toward Cancer’s extreme 1953
Recognition”, Preprints 2023, 2023010396 (doi: 1954
10.20944/preprints202301.0396.v1). 1955
267. Henry Garrett,“Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Warns Hyper Landmark of 1956
neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth In Super Type-Versions of Cancer’s neutrosophic 1957
Recognition”, Preprints 2023, 2023010395 (doi: 1958
10.20944/preprints202301.0395.v1). 1959
USA
USA
268. Henry Garrett,“The Constructions of (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs on the 1960
Cancer’s Recognition in The Confrontation With Super Attacks In Hyper 1961
Situations By Implementing (Neutrosophic) 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in The 1962
Technical Approaches to Neutralize SuperHyperViews”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1963
10.13140/RG.2.2.26240.51204). 1964
269. Henry Garrett,“(Neutrosophic) 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing As the 1965
Entrepreneurs on Cancer’s Recognitions To Fail Forcing Style As the Super 1966
Classes With Hyper Effects In The Background of the Framework is So-Called 1967
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 1968
10.13140/RG.2.2.12818.73925). 1969
270. Henry Garrett,“Super Actions On The Types of Hyper Levels In The Sensible 1970
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth On Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition and 1971
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchGate 2023,(doi: 1972
10.13140/RG.2.2.26836.88960). 1973
271. Henry Garrett,“SuperHyperGirth Approaches on the Super Challenges on the 1974
Cancer’s Recognition In the Hyper Model of (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, 1975
ResearchGate 2023,(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.36745.93289). 1976
272. Henry Garrett,“Extreme SuperHyperClique as the Firm Scheme of 1977
Confrontation under Cancer’s Recognition as the Model in The Setting of 1978
10.20944/preprints202301.0308.v1). 1980
273. Henry Garrett,“Uncertainty On The Act And Effect Of Cancer Alongside The 1981
Foggy Positions Of Cells Toward Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperClique inside 1982
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Titled Cancer’s Recognition”, Preprints 2023, 1983
2023010282 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0282.v1). 1984
274. Henry Garrett,“Neutrosophic Version Of Separates Groups Of Cells In Cancer’s 1985
Recognition On Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2023010267 1986
(doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0267.v1).). 1987
275. Henry Garrett, “The Shift Paradigm To Classify Separately The Cells and 1988
Affected Cells Toward The Totality Under Cancer’s Recognition By New 1989
Multiple Definitions On the Sets Polynomials Alongside Numbers In The 1990
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperMatching Theory Based on SuperHyperGraph and 1991
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph”, Preprints 2023, 2023010265 (doi: 1992
10.20944/preprints202301.0265.v1). 1993
276. Henry Garrett,“Breaking the Continuity and Uniformity of Cancer In The 1994
Worst Case of Full Connections With Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique In 1995
Cancer’s Recognition Applied in (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 1996
2023, 2023010262,(doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0262.v1). 1997
277. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperStable as the Survivors on the 1998
Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition Based on Uncertainty to All Modes in 1999
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2023010240 (doi: 2000
10.20944/preprints202301.0240.v1). 2001
278. Henry Garrett, “Extremism of the Attacked Body Under the Cancer’s 2002
Circumstances Where Cancer’s Recognition Titled (Neutrosophic) 2003
SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2023010224, (doi: 2004
10.20944/preprints202301.0224.v1). 2005
USA
USA
279. Henry Garrett,“SuperHyperMatching By (R-)Definitions And Polynomials To 2006
Monitor Cancer’s Recognition In Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”, 2007
ResearchGate 2023,(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.35061.65767). 2008
280. Henry Garrett,“The Focus on The Partitions Obtained By Parallel Moves In 2009
The Cancer’s Extreme Recognition With Different Types of Extreme 2010
SuperHyperMatching Set and Polynomial on (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, 2011
281. Henry Garrett,“Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique Decides the Failures on the 2013
Cancer’s Recognition in the Perfect Connections of Cancer’s Attacks By 2014
SuperHyperModels Named (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 2015
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.32530.73922). 2016
282. Henry Garrett,“Indeterminacy On The All Possible Connections of Cells In 2017
Front of Cancer’s Attacks In The Terms of Neutrosophic Failed 2018
SuperHyperClique on Cancer’s Recognition called Neutrosophic 2019
SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.15897.70243). 2020
283. Henry Garrett,“Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique Decides the Failures on the 2021
Cancer’s Recognition in the Perfect Connections of Cancer’s Attacks By 2022
SuperHyperModels Named (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 2023
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.32530.73922). 2024
Recognitions And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2026
2023010105 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0105.v1). 2027
285. Henry Garrett,“Perfect Directions Toward Idealism in Cancer’s Neutrosophic 2028
Recognition Forwarding Neutrosophic SuperHyperClique on Neutrosophic 2029
286. Henry Garrett,“Demonstrating Complete Connections in Every Embedded 2031
Regions and Sub-Regions in the Terms of Cancer’s Recognition and 2032
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperClique”, 2033
10.20944/preprints202301.0105.v1). 2038
10.20944/preprints202301.0088.v1). 2042
289. Henry Garrett,“Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic Regions titled 2043
neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperStable in Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition 2044
modeled in the Form of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 2023, 2045
(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.17385.36968). 2046
Neutrosophic Recognition And Beyond ”, Preprints 2023, 2023010044 2049
USA
USA
Well- SuperHyperModelled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2051
2023010043 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0043.v1). 2052
292. Henry Garrett, “Using the Tool As (Neutrosophic) Failed SuperHyperStable To 2053
SuperHyperModel Cancer’s Recognition Titled (Neutrosophic) 2054
Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable To Act on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognitions In 2057
Special ViewPoints”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.11447.80803). 2058
Well-SuperHyperModelled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 2060
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.35774.77123). 2061
Neutrosophic Recognition And Beyond ”, ResearchGate 2022, (doi: 2064
10.13140/RG.2.2.36141.77287). 2065
Recognitions And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 2022, (doi: 2067
10.13140/RG.2.2.29430.88642). 2068
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 2022, (doi: 2071
10.13140/RG.2.2.11369.16487). 2072
Featuring (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperAlliances”, Preprints 2074
2022, 2022120549 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202212.0549.v1). 2075
Featuring (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperAlliances”, 2077
Recognitions And Related (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperClasses”, Preprints 2022, 2082
2022120540 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202212.0540.v1). 2083
Recognitions And Related (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperClasses”, ResearchGate 2087
2022, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.14426.41923). 2088
Preprints 2022, 2022120500 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202212.0500.v1). 2091
ResearchGate 2022 (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.20993.12640). 2094
USA
USA
304. Henry Garrett,“Some SuperHyperDegrees and Co-SuperHyperDegrees on 2095
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs and SuperHyperGraphs Alongside Applications 2096
in Cancer’s Treatments”, Preprints 2022, 2022120324 (doi: 2097
10.20944/preprints202212.0324.v1). 2098
305. Henry Garrett, “Some SuperHyperDegrees and Co-SuperHyperDegrees on 2099
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs And SuperHyperGraphs Alongside Applications 2100
in Cancer’s Treatments”, ResearchGate 2022 (doi: 2101
10.13140/RG.2.2.23123.04641). 2102
Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses”, Preprints 2022, 2022110576 (doi: 2105
10.20944/preprints202211.0576.v1). 2106
Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses”, ResearchGate 2022 (doi: 2109
10.13140/RG.2.2.23324.56966). 2110
308. Henry Garrett, “Basic Neutrosophic Notions Concerning SuperHyperDominating 2111
and Neutrosophic SuperHyperResolving in SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchGate 2112
2022 (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.29173.86244). 2113
309. Henry Garrett, “Initial Material of Neutrosophic Preliminaries to Study Some 2114
Neutrosophic Notions Based on Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) in 2115
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)”, ResearchGate 2022 (doi: 2116
10.13140/RG.2.2.25385.88160). 2117
310. Henry Garrett, ”Triangle-free search Edge In Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”. 2118
Dr. Henry Garrett, 2024 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.13594674). 2119
311. Henry Garrett, ”Diamond search In Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 2120
Henry Garrett, 2024 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.13525750). 2121
312. Henry Garrett, ”Triangle-free search In Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 2122
313. Henry Garrett, ”Edge Cover In Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2124
Garrett, 2024 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.13376543). 2125
314. Henry Garrett, “Vertex Cover In Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2126
315. Henry Garrett, “Burning Number In Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 2128
316. Henry Garrett, “Zero Forcing In Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2130
317. Henry Garrett, “Dual Domination In Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs 6”. Dr. 2132
USA
USA
323. Henry Garrett, “Perfect Domination In Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs 3”. Dr. 2144
324. Henry Garrett, “Perfect Domination In Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs 2”. Dr. 2146
325. Henry Garrett, “Perfect Domination In Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 2148
326. Henry Garrett, “Stable Sequence In Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 2150
327. Henry Garrett, “Resolving Sequence In Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 2152
328. Henry Garrett, “Dominating Sequence In Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 2154
329. Henry Garrett, “Stable In Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2156
330. Henry Garrett, “Reverse Connective Domination In Neutrosophic 2158
SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8206898). 2159
331. Henry Garrett, “Equal Connective Domination In Neutrosophic 2160
SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8201378). 2161
332. Henry Garrett, “Connective Domination In Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”. 2162
333. Henry Garrett, “Domination In Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2164
334. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperPerfect Search In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2166
335. Henry Garrett, “Reverse Strict Dimension Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. 2168
336. Henry Garrett, “Unequal Dimension Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 2170
337. Henry Garrett, “Strict Dimension Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 2172
338. Henry Garrett, “Reverse Strict Connective In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2174
339. Henry Garrett, “Unequal Connective Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 2176
USA
USA
340. Henry Garrett, “Strict Connective Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 2178
341. Henry Garrett, “Reverse Dimension Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 2180
342. Henry Garrett, “Equal Dimension Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 2182
343. Henry Garrett, “Dimension Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2184
344. Henry Garrett, “Reverse Connective Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 2186
345. Henry Garrett, “Equal Connective Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 2188
346. Henry Garrett, “Connective Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2190
347. Henry Garrett, “United Dominating In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2192
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8027488). 2193
348. Henry Garrett, “Zero Forcing In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2194
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8020181). 2195
349. Henry Garrett, “Matrix-Based In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2196
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7978921). 2197
350. Henry Garrett, “Collections of Math II”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2198
10.5281/zenodo.7943878). 2199
351. Henry Garrett, “Dominating-Edges In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2200
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7943871). 2201
352. Henry Garrett, “Edge-Gap In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2202
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7923786). 2203
353. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 2204
354. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. 2206
355. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2208
356. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Cycle-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2210
357. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Cycle-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 2212
358. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Cycle-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2214
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7854561). 2215
359. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Type-Path-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 2216
USA
USA
360. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Type-Path-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 2218
361. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Type-Path-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2220
362. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Path-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2222
363. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Path-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 2224
364. Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Path-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2226
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7812750). 2227
365. Henry Garrett, “Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 2228
366. Henry Garrett, “Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. 2230
367. Henry Garrett, “Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2232
368. Henry Garrett, “Hamiltonian-Cycle-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2234
369. Henry Garrett, “Hamiltonian-Cycle-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. 2236
370. Henry Garrett, “Hamiltonian-Cycle-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2238
371. Henry Garrett, “Hamiltonian-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2240
372. Henry Garrett, “Hamiltonian-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2242
373. Henry Garrett, “Hamiltonian-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2244
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7783791). 2245
374. Henry Garrett, “Trace-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2246
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7780123). 2247
375. Henry Garrett, “Trace-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2248
376. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperDuality”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2250
10.5281/zenodo.7637762). 2251
377. Henry Garrett, “Trace-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2252
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7766174). 2253
378. Henry Garrett, “Edge-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2254
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7762232). 2255
379. Henry Garrett, “Edge-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2256
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7758601). 2257
USA
USA
380. Henry Garrett, “Edge-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2258
10.5281/zenodo.7754661). 2259
381. Henry Garrett, “Vertex-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2260
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7750995) . 2261
382. Henry Garrett, “Vertex-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2262
383. Henry Garrett, “Vertex-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2264
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7747236). 2265
384. Henry Garrett, “Stable-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2266
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7742587). 2267
385. Henry Garrett, “Stable-Decompositions In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2268
386. Henry Garrett, “Stable-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2270
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7734719). 2271
387. Henry Garrett, “Clique-Neighbors In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2272
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7730484). 2273
388. Henry Garrett, “Clique-Decompositions In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 2274
389. Henry Garrett, “Clique-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2276
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7722865). 2277
390. Henry Garrett, “Space In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2278
10.5281/zenodo.7713563). 2279
391. Henry Garrett, “Space In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2280
10.5281/zenodo.7709116). 2281
392. Henry Garrett, “Edge-Connectivity In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2282
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7706415). 2283
393. Henry Garrett, “Vertex-Connectivity In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2284
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7706063). 2285
394. Henry Garrett, “Tree-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2286
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7701906). 2287
395. Henry Garrett, “Chord In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2288
10.5281/zenodo.7700205). 2289
396. Henry Garrett, “(i,j)-Domination In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2290
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7694876). 2291
397. Henry Garrett, “Edge-Domination In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2292
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7679410). 2293
398. Henry Garrett, “K-Domination In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2294
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7675982). 2295
399. Henry Garrett, “K-Number In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2296
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7672388). 2297
USA
USA
400. Henry Garrett, “Order In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2298
10.5281/zenodo.7668648). 2299
401. Henry Garrett, “Coloring In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2300
10.5281/zenodo.7662810). 2301
402. Henry Garrett, “Dimension In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2302
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7659162). 2303
403. Henry Garrett, “Cancer In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2304
10.5281/zenodo.7653233). 2305
404. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperWheel ”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2306
10.5281/zenodo.7653204). 2307
405. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperMultipartite”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2308
10.5281/zenodo.7653142). 2309
406. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperBipartite”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2310
10.5281/zenodo.7653117). 2311
407. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperStar ”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2312
10.5281/zenodo.7653089). 2313
408. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperCycle”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2314
10.5281/zenodo.7651687). 2315
409. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperPath”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2316
10.5281/zenodo.7651619). 2317
410. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperDomination”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2318
10.5281/zenodo.7651439). 2319
411. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperDominating”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2320
10.5281/zenodo.7650729). 2321
412. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperConnected ”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2322
10.5281/zenodo.7647868). 2323
413. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperTotal ”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2324
10.5281/zenodo.7647017). 2325
414. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperPerfect”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2326
10.5281/zenodo.7644894). 2327
415. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperJoin”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2328
10.5281/zenodo.7641880). 2329
416. Henry Garrett, “Path SuperHyperColoring”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2330
10.5281/zenodo.7632923). 2331
417. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperDensity”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2332
10.5281/zenodo.7623459). 2333
418. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnectivities”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2334
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7606416). 2335
419. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperConnectivities”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2336
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7606416). 2337
USA
USA
420. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperConnectivities”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2338
10.5281/zenodo.7606404). 2339
421. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2340
10.5281/zenodo.7580018). 2341
422. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperCycle”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2342
10.5281/zenodo.7580018). 2343
423. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperCycle”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2344
10.5281/zenodo.7580018). 2345
424. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperCycle”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2346
10.5281/zenodo.7579929). 2347
425. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2348
10.5281/zenodo.7563170). 2349
426. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperGirth”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2350
10.5281/zenodo.7563164). 2351
427. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperGirth”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2352
10.5281/zenodo.7563160). 2353
428. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperGirth”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2354
10.5281/zenodo.7563160). 2355
429. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On SuperHyperGirth”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2356
10.5281/zenodo.7563160). 2357
430. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperMatching”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2358
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7557063). 2359
431. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperMatching”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2360
10.5281/zenodo.7557009). 2361
432. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On SuperHyperMatching”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2362
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7539484). 2363
433. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2364
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7523390). 2365
434. Henry Garrett, “Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2366
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7523390). 2367
435. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On Failed SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2368
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7523390). 2369
436. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2370
10.5281/zenodo.7574952). 2371
437. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2372
10.5281/zenodo.7574992). 2373
438. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2374
10.5281/zenodo.7523357). 2375
439. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2376
10.5281/zenodo.7523357). 2377
USA
USA
440. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2378
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7504782). 2379
441. Henry Garrett, “Extreme Failed SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2380
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7504782). 2381
442. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On Failed SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2382
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7504782). 2383
443. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2384
10.5281/zenodo.7499395). 2385
444. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2386
10.5281/zenodo.7499395). 2387
445. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2388
10.5281/zenodo.7499395). 2389
446. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperForcing”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2390
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7497450). 2391
447. Henry Garrett, “Extreme Failed SuperHyperForcing”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2392
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7497450). 2393
448. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2394
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7494862). 2395
449. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperForcing”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2396
10.5281/zenodo.7494862). 2397
450. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On SuperHyperForcing”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2398
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7494862). 2399
451. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperAlliances”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2400
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7493845). 2401
452. Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperAlliances”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2402
10.5281/zenodo.7493845). 2403
453. Henry Garrett, “Overlook On SuperHyperAlliances”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 2404
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7493845). 2405
454. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperMatching”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2406
10.5281/zenodo.7539484). 2407
455. Henry Garrett, “Failed SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2408
10.5281/zenodo.7523390). 2409
456. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2410
10.5281/zenodo.7523357). 2411
457. Henry Garrett, “Failed SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2412
10.5281/zenodo.7504782). 2413
458. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2414
10.5281/zenodo.7499395). 2415
459. Henry Garrett, “Failed SuperHyperForcing”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2416
10.5281/zenodo.7497450). 2417
USA
USA
460. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperForcing”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2418
10.5281/zenodo.7494862). 2419
461. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperAlliances”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2420
10.5281/zenodo.7493845). 2421
462. Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2422
10.5281/zenodo.7480110). 2423
463. Henry Garrett, “Neut. SuperHyperEdges”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2424
10.5281/zenodo.7378758). 2425
464. Henry Garrett, “Beyond Neutrosophic Graphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2426
10.5281/zenodo.6320305). 2427
465. Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Duality”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 2428
10.5281/zenodo.6677173). 2429
USA

New Ideas in Recognition of Cancer and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph With Star and Wheel by Diamond Search Edge

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

New Ideas in Recognition of Cancer and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph With Star and Wheel by Diamond Search Edge

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

New Ideas in Recognition of Cancer and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph With Star and Wheel by Diamond Search Edge

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Dr. Henry Garrett ◦ Independent Researcher ◦ Department of Mathematics ◦ DrHenryGarrett@gmail.

com ◦ Manhattan, NY,

New Ideas In Recognition of Cancer And Neutrosophic 2

SuperHyperGraph With Star and Wheel By Diamond search 3

Dr. Henry Garrett ◦ Independent Researcher ◦ Department of Mathematics ◦ 6

[email protected] ◦ Manhattan, NY, USA 7

In this scientific research, (Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic 9

SuperHyperDiamond search Edge). Let a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (SHG) S be a pair 10

S = (V, E). Consider a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet As = {E1 , E2 , . . . , Es }. Then As is 11

statements is called Neutrosophic SuperHyperDiamond search Edge criteria holds. 13

SuperHyperNotions, namely a Strongly Diamond search Edge and a Neutrosophic 15

them, but research has progressed and SuperHyperNotion, SuperHyperUniform, and 17

SuperHyperClass are well-defined and well-reviewed based on them. Literature review is 18

research, a comparison between this SuperHyperNotion with other SuperHyperNotions 20

and basic SuperHyperNumbers is presented. Definitions are followed by examples and 21

examples, so clarifications are guided by various tools. Applications are designed to 22

the relationships between them all are officially called “SuperHyperEdge”. 28

“SuperHyperGraph” and “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph” frameworks are selected and 29

super-hypermodels open avenues for research on theoretical aspects and “cancer 31

“re-define” the concept of “Strongly Diamond search Edge mastery”. 37

SuperHyperVertices and SuperHyperEdges are assigned by alphabetical labels. In this 38

hyperedges, and hyperedges belonging to Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph” with key 41

points, it is redefined. ”values of vertices & number of positions in alphabet”, ”Values 42

of SuperVertices&maximum values of its vertices”, ”values of edges&maximum values of 43

like to introduce the next SuperHyperClass SuperHyperGraph based on Strongly 46

definition in the SuperHyperClass type would be disciplined. If there is a need to have 48

distinguished because they are characterized in the SuperHyperClass disciplinary 53

methods based on a dominant Strongly Diamond search Edge. Because of having 54

Strongly Diamond search Edge, there is a need to “re-define” the concept of 55

“neutrosophic Strongly Diamond search Edge” and “neutrosophic Strongly Diamond 56

search Edge”. SuperHyperVertices and SuperHyperEdges are assigned by alphabetical 57

Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph” is redefined if the 59

redefined to a “Neutrosophic Strongly Diamond search Edge”. It is useful to define a 61

“Neutrosophic” version of SuperHyperClasses. Since there are more ways to obtain 62

Neutrosophic type results, a SuperHyper- Neutrosophic Strongly Diamond search Edge 63

becomes more understandable. Consider a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. If the 64

desired table exists, there are a number of Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses. So are 65

SuperHyperPath, SuperHyperCycle, SuperHyperStar, SuperHyperBipartite, 66

SuperHyperMultiPartite and SuperHyperWheel. ”Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath”, 67

“Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle”, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar”, “Neutrosophic 68

SuperHyperBipartite”, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultiPartite” and “Neutrosophic 69

SuperHyperWheel”. A graph is SuperHyperUniform if it is a SuperHyperGraph and the 70

number of SuperHyperEdges elements is the same. Consider a Neutrosophic 71

SuperHyperGraph. There are a number of SuperHyperClasses as follows. It is a 72

SuperHyperPath if there is only one SuperVertex as an intersection between two given 73

SuperHyperEdges with two exceptions. If only one SuperVertex is given as an 74

intersection between two SuperHyperEdges, it is SuperHyperCycle. It is 75

SuperHyperStar and only one SuperVertex as intersection among all SuperHyperEdges. 76

It is SuperHyperBipartite, and only one SuperVertex is given as the intersection between 77

SuperHyperEdge in common. This is SuperHyperMultiPartite. Only one SuperVertex is 79

given as an intersection between two SuperHyperEdges, and these SuperVertices, which 80

form separate multisets, have no SuperHyperEdge in common. If only one 81

SuperHyperEdge among the given two SuperHyperEdges is a SuperHyperWheel and a 82

SuperVertex has a SuperHyperEdge with any regular SuperVertex. SuperHyperModel 83

suggests specific designs and specific architectures. SuperHyperModel is officially called 84

“SuperHyperGraph” and “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph”. In this SuperHyperModel, 85

cells and the “special group” of cells. SuperHyperModeled as “SuperHyperEdges”. 88

Sometimes, to have a more accurate SuperHyperModel, it is useful to have some degree 89

of determinism, uncertainty, and neutrality, in this case the SuperHyperModel is called 90