New Keynesian Economics: A Modern Evolution of Keynesian Thought
New Keynesian Economics: A Modern Evolution of Keynesian Thought
One of the central tenets of New Keynesian Economics is the concept of sticky prices and wages.
Unlike classical Keynesian theory, which assumes that prices and wages can adjust freely in
response to changes in demand, New Keynesian theorists argue that they do not adjust
immediately due to several factors such as contracts, menu costs, and slow information
dissemination. These rigidities can cause prolonged periods of unemployment or inflation. For
instance, a business may be reluctant to lower prices during a recession because of the associated
costs of changing price tags or renegotiating wage contracts (Mankiw, 2021). This framework
helps explain why markets may not reach equilibrium quickly, reinforcing the need for
government intervention, such as fiscal and monetary policies, to correct market imbalances.
Another key aspect of New Keynesian thought is its focus on imperfect competition. In real-
world markets, firms often have some degree of monopoly power, which allows them to set
prices above marginal cost. This diverges from the perfectly competitive markets assumed in
classical Keynesian models. By accounting for market imperfections, New Keynesian
economists offer a more realistic portrayal of economic behavior. For example, in a
monopolistically competitive market, firms may hesitate to lower prices during a downturn to
maintain profit margins, leading to reduced output and higher unemployment. This perspective
helps justify government policies aimed at stabilizing demand, as private sector responses may
not be sufficient to restore full employment (Blanchard, 2021).
New Keynesian Economics also emphasizes the importance of expectations and rational
behavior in macroeconomic outcomes. Unlike classical Keynesian models, which focus on the
short term and assume agents are somewhat myopic, New Keynesian theory integrates
expectations into its analysis. Agents—both consumers and firms—are assumed to have forward-
looking behavior. This means that their decisions are based not only on current economic
conditions but also on expectations about future policies, prices, and income. For example, if
people expect the government to introduce a stimulus package in response to a recession, they
might adjust their consumption and investment decisions accordingly. This can either amplify or
dampen the effectiveness of economic policies, depending on how expectations are managed
(Krugman & Wells, 2020).
New Keynesian Economics has had profound implications for modern macroeconomic policy.
Central banks, for instance, have incorporated many of its principles into monetary policy
frameworks. The idea that inflation does not adjust instantly to changes in demand has led to the
widespread adoption of inflation-targeting regimes by central banks. By adjusting interest rates
to influence inflation expectations, central banks can better manage economic fluctuations.
Similarly, the emphasis on wage and price stickiness has reinforced the argument for
countercyclical fiscal policies—such as government spending and tax cuts—to mitigate the
effects of economic downturns (Blanchard, 2021).
Moreover, the 2008 financial crisis and subsequent Great Recession provided a real-world
testing ground for New Keynesian ideas. During the crisis, many economists advocated for
government intervention to stimulate demand, reflecting New Keynesian beliefs in price and
wage rigidities. In contrast to classical economic models, which might have predicted that
markets would self-correct, the prolonged downturn highlighted the need for government action
to restore full employment. The policies of quantitative easing and fiscal stimulus packages
implemented by governments worldwide were deeply influenced by New Keynesian thought
(Krugman & Wells, 2020).
References
Krugman, P., & Wells, R. (2020). Macroeconomics (6th ed.). Worth Publishers.
http://students.aiu.edu/submissions/profiles/resources/onlineBook/b4L7T8_k_economics.pdf