HW11
HW11
P7.6 For the laminar parabolic boundary-layer profile of Eq. (7.6), compute the shape factor “H”
and compare with the exact Blasius-theory result, Eq. (7.31).
Solution: Given the profile approximation u/U 2 2, where y/, compute
1
u u 2
1 dy (2 )(1 2 )d
2 2
0
U U 0
15
1
u 1
* 1 dy (1 2 2 ) d
0
U 0
3
Hence H / ( /3)/(2 /15) 2.50 (compared to 2.59 for Blasius solution)
P7.10 Repeat Prob. P7.9, using a trigonometric profile approximation:
u y
sin( )
U 2
Does this profile satisfy the conditions of laminar flat plate flow?
This is a good approximation. The velocity profile has u = 0 at the wall, u = U at y = δ, and, for
dp/dx = 0, a flat plate, it has 2u / y 2 0 at the wall, as required from momentum.
To find the skin friction and δ, we need to integrate the boundary layer integral relation:
u U d d
w | y 0 U 2 0.1366 U 2
y 2 dx dx
Good accuracy! The sine wave is an excellent approximation to the Blasius profile.
P7.19 Air at 20C and 1 atm flows at 50 ft/s past a thin flat plate whose area (bL) is 24 ft2. If the total
friction drag is 0.3 lbf, what are the length and width of the plate?
Solution: For air at 20C and 1 atm, take = 0.00238 slug/ft3 and =3.76E-7 slug/ft-s. Low speed
air, not too big a plate: Guess laminar flow and check this later. Use Eq. (7.27):
1.328
CD (one side) hence F C D V 2 2bL , where bL 24 ft 2
Re L 2
Solution: For at 20C and 1 atm, take = 1.2 kg/m3 and = 1.8E-5 kg/m-s. Check the
Reynolds number to see if the flow is laminar or turbulent:
UL (1.2)(3.0)(1.0)
Re L 200, 000 Laminar
1.8E 5
We can proceed with our laminar-flow formulas:
Finally, compute the drag for both sides of the plate, A = 2bL:
1.328
CD 0.00297 ,
200, 000
1.2
or : F CD U 2 (2bL) (0.00297)( )(3.0) 2 [2(2.0)(1.0)] 0.064 N Ans.(c)
2 2
NOTE: For part (b), we never had to compute the boundary layer thickness, 11.2 mm.
P7.33 An alternate analysis of turbulent flat-plate flow was given by Prandtl in 1927, using a
wall shear-stress formula from pipe flow
1/4
w 0.0225 U
2
U
Show that this formula can be combined with Eqs. (7.32) and (7.40) to derive the following
relations for turbulent flat-plate flow.
0.37 0.0577 0.072
cf CD
x Re1/5
x Re1/5
x Re1/5
L
Solution: Use Prandtl’s correlation for the left hand side of Eq. (7.32) in the text:
d d 7
w 0.0225U 2 ( /U )1/4 U 2 U 2 , cancel U 2 and rearrange:
dx dx 72
4 5/4
1/4 d 0.2314( /U)1/4 dx, Integrate: 0.2314( /U)1/4 x
5
Take the (5/4)th root of both sides and rearrange for the final thickness result:
0.37
0.37( /U)1/5x 4/5 , or: Ans. (a)
x Re1/5
x
1/5
2(0.0225) 0.0577
Substitute (x) into w : Cf 1/4 , or Cf Ans. (b)
(0.37) Ux Re1/5
x
1
x 5 0.072
Finally, CD Cf d Cf (at x L) Ans. (c)
0 L 4 Re1/5
L