US03CCHE21 Unit-2 (A) VBT
US03CCHE21 Unit-2 (A) VBT
US03CCHE21 Unit-2 (A) VBT
Introduction
We have already said that Werner was the first to explain the
nature of bonding in complex compounds. However, with the
advancement of theories of valence, modern theories have been
proposed to explain the nature of metal-ligand bonding in complexes.
These theories can also explain the colour, geometry and magnetic
properties of the complex compounds. These mode theories are:
(i) Valence Bond Theory: VBT (due to L. Pauling and JL Slater, 1935)
(ii) Crystal Field Theory: CFT (due to H. Bethe. 1929 and Van Vleck,
1932) (iii) Ligand Field Theory LFT or Molecular Orbital Theory, MOT
(due to J. Van Vleck, 1935). Here we shall discuss only valence bond
theory.
♦
3. Vacant hybrid orbitals of the metal atom or ion overlap with the filled
(containing lone pair of electrons) u-orbitals of the ligands to form
ligand---+ metal u-bond. This bond is known as coordinate bond is a
special type of covalent bond and shows the characteristics of both the
< :J::H
diagonal
T
Ee f pEtTtBqBa.EE
.E
G E
.aeatm.az ghYaed
affettuosoad I Am
B
oEjf.m
Ftzenattretaan.az
ERE
g
Dr. Trupti Darji (V.P. and R.P.T.P. Science College) 4
e
[Fe(CN)6]3- ion) and s and p orbitals are 4s and 4p. Thus the given ion
results from (4s) (4p3) (4dz2) (4dx2-y2) hybridisation as shown in Figure. This
discussion shows that in the formation of [FeF6]3- in the original valence-
shell configuration of Fe3+ ion is not disturbed.
aDooeroadthdy
aGg Ftf
Eh
a re
BEapp
y
BaozEo6odaamta
dem
i.FTB.BI S
Z E
Dr. Trupti Darji (V.P. and R.P.T.P. Science College) 6
Differences between inner orbital and outer orbital
octahedral complexes
(i) These are formed by d2sp3 (i) These are formed by sp3d2
hybridisation i.e.in the formation of hybridisation i.e.in the formation of
six d2sp3 hybrid orbitals, two six sp3d2 hybrid orbitals, two nd
(n-1)d orbitals of e 9 set, one ns orbitals of e 9 set, one ns and three
and three np orbitals are used. np orbitals are used. Thus all the
(n-1)d orbitals belong to the inner orbitals belong to the outer
(penultimate) shell while ns and (ultimate) shell.
np orbitals belong to the outer
(ultimate) shell.
(iii) These are given by strong (iii) These are given by weak
ligands. ligands.
♦
808
E jo
Yggfg't
Ei gqE
a
a.pt
GGBgFn.ggg co
NC Ni
iO
co
CO
c
c
o
safe essEtT3g
tff
F
Limitations of Valence bond theory :
(1) VBT cannot account for the relative stabilities of different shapes and
different coordination numbers in metal complexes, e.g., it cannot
explain satisfactorily as to why Co(+2) (d8 system) forms both octahedral
and tetrahedral complexes while Ni(+2) (d7 system) rarely forms
tetrahedral complexes.
(2) VBT cannot explain as to why Cu(+2) forms only one distorted
octahedral complex even when all the six ligands are identical.
(3) This theory cannot account for the relative rates of reactions of
analogous metal complexes. e.g. [Mn(phen)3]2+ dissociates
instantaneously in acidic aqueous solution while
[Fe(phen)3]2+dissociates at a slow rate.
(7) This theory does not predict or explain the magnetic behaviours of
complexes. This theory only predicts the number of unpaired electrons.
Its prediction even for the number of unpaired electrons and their
correlation with stereochemistry is misleading. VBT cannot explain the
temperature dependent paramagnetism of the complexes.
(8) VBT cannot give any explanation for the order of reactivities of
inner-orbital inert complexes of d3, d4, d5 and d6 ions of the observed
differences in the energies of activation in a series of similar complexes.
(9) The magnetic moment values of the complexes of certain ions (e.g.,
Co2+, Ni2+ etc.) are much higher than those expected by spin-only
formula. VBT can not explain the enhanced values of magnetic
moments.