0% found this document useful (0 votes)
23 views23 pages

Corrigenda

Uploaded by

Rishabh Khatri
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
23 views23 pages

Corrigenda

Uploaded by

Rishabh Khatri
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 23

Relativistic Hydrodynamics

Luciano Rezzolla
Institute for Theoretical Physics, Frankfurt am Main, Germany

Olindo Zanotti
Laboratory of Applied Mathematics, University of Trento, Italy

1
Errata/Corrige

Last update: 19 April 2018


1
A Brief Review of General Relativity

• Page 28, Eq. (1.115). Change


0 0 0
vx + V W vy W vz
vx = , vy = , vz = .
1 + v x0 V 1 + v x0 V 1 + v x0 V

0 0 0
vx + V vy vz
vx = , vy = , vz = .
1 + v x0 V W (1 + v x0 V ) W (1 + v x0 V )

• Page 32, Eq. (1.140). Change

LφV T = φLV T ,

LφV T = φLV T − V LT φ ,

• Page 32, Eq. (1.141). Change


L V φ = V ν ∂ ν φν = ,



LV φ = V ν ∂ν φ = ,

• Page 33, four lines before Eq. (1.147). Change
...not all bases are such that eµ · eν 6= ηµν

...not all bases are such that eµ · eν = ηµν
• Page 38, Eq. (1.174). Change

Lη ξ = Lξ η = 0 ,


Lη ξ = −Lξ η = 0 ,
A Brief Review of General Relativity vii

• Page 43, Eq. (1.196). Change


d2 (xµ + ξ µ ) d(xα + ξ µ ) d(xβ + ξ µ )
2
+ Γµαβ (x + ξ) = 0.
dλ dλ dλ

d2 (xµ + ξ µ ) d(xα + ξ α ) d(xβ + ξ β )
2
+ Γµαβ (xµ + ξ µ ) = 0.
dλ dλ dλ
• Page 44, Eq. (1.202). Change

Rα[βγδ] = 2(Rαβγδ + Rαδβγ + Rαγδβ ) = 0 .


3!Rα[βγδ] = 2(Rαβγδ + Rαδβγ + Rαγδβ ) = 0 .
• Page 45, Eq. (1.207). Change

Γrθθ = − sin θ cos θ , Γθrθ = cot θ .

Γθφφ = − sin θ cos θ , Γφθφ = cot θ .

• Page 45, Eq. (1.208). Change


1 1
Rrθθr = − gθθ = − sin2 θ , Rrθθr = grr = 1 ,
RS2 RS2

1 1
Rθφφθ = − gφφ = − sin2 θ , Rφθφθ = gφφ = 1 ,
RS2 RS2
• Page 45, after Eq. (1.208). Change
while the Ricci scalar is simply R = 1/RS2 .

while the Ricci tensor is Rij = gij /RS2 and the Ricci scalar is simply given by R =
2/RS2 .
• Page 48, Eq. (1.220). Change
 
1 1
Rµν = 8π Tµν − T gµν + Λgµν ,
2 4π
→  
1 1
Rµν = 8π Tµν − T gµν + Λgµν ,
2 8π
• Page 49, one line after Eq. (1.223). Change
...the coordinate time runs slower than the proper time.

...the proper time runs slower than the coordinate time.
viii A Brief Review of General Relativity

• Page 51, Eq. (1.229). Change


" −1 # "   2 #
2
d 2M dr dθ 2 dφ
1− =r + sin θ ,
dτ r dτ dτ dτ


" −1 # " 2  2 #
d 2M dr dθ 2 dφ
1− = r + sin θ
dτ r dτ dτ dτ
" 2  −2  2 #
M dt 2M dr
− 2 + 1− ,
r dτ r dτ
2
A Kinetic-Theory Description of
Fluids

• Page 77, Eq. (2.30). Change


Z
S(t) := −kB V H(t) = −kB V ~,u
f (t, x ~ ) ln(f (t, x ~ )) d3 u ,
~,u

→ Z
S(t) := −kB V H(t) = −kB V ~ )) d3 u ,
~ ) ln(f (t, u
f (t, u

• Page 79, after Eq. (2.39). Change


“...through the evolution of the momentum flux ρvj (i.e., the rate of change of linear
momentum per unit time and unit area), ...”

“...through the flux of the momentum density tensor ρvi vj + Pij (i.e., the rate of change
per unit time and unit area orthogonal to the i-th direction of the j-th component of the
linear momentum), ...”
• Page 80, after Eq. (2.42). Change
“...unlike the kinetic energy, 12 ρv i vi ,...”

“...unlike the kinetic energy density, 12 ρv i vi ,...”
• Page 81, Eq. (2.47). Change

3 kB T 2 
= , p= = nkB T ,
2 m 3 nm

3 kB T 2
= , p= n m  = nkB T ,
2 m 3
• Page 82. Change Eq. (2.51)

3kB T 3k T
u2 i =
h~ ui2 = B − ~v 2 ,
− h~
m m

3kB T 3k T
u2 i =
h~ ui2 = B + ~v 2 ,
+ h~
m m
x A Kinetic-Theory Description of Fluids

• Page 83, Eq. (2.54). Change


3/2
mu2
  
m
f0 (u) = 4πnu2 exp − .
2πkB T 2kB T
→ 3/2
mu2
  
m
4πu2 f0 (u) = 4πnu2 exp − .
2πkB T 2kB T
• Page 84, Fig. 2.5. Change the labels on the axes: v → u.
• Page 84, Eq. (2.59). Change
Z
mn m
T = u − ~v )2 f0 d3 u =
(~ u − ~v )2 i .
h(~
3kB 3kB
→ Z
m m
T = u − ~v )2 f0 d3 u =
(~ u − ~v )2 i .
h(~
3nkB 3kB
• Page 84, last paragraph of Sect. 2.2.4. Change
“(Problem 1 is dedicated to showing...)”

“(Problem 4 is dedicated to showing...)”
• Page 86, after Eq. (2.70). Change
“...represents the flux of energy per unit surface and unit time, i.e., the Newtonian energy
flux density vector.”

“...represents the flux of energy per per unit time and unit area, i.e., the Newtonian energy-
density flux vector.”
• Page 90, after Eq. (2.82). Change
“...and recalling that p0x = 0 in the local Lorentz rest frame...”

“...and recalling that px0 = 0 in the local Lorentz rest frame...”
• Page 90, last line. Change
“The relativistic Maxwell–Boltzmann equation can then be obtained...”

“The relativistic Boltzmann equation can then be obtained...”
• Page 91, Eq. (2.88). Change
p
K := (p1 )α (p2 )α − m4 c4 .

→ p
K := (p1 )α (p2 )α − m2 c2 .
• Page 91, after Eq. (2.88). Change
“Note that the collisionless Maxwell-Boltzmann equation, namely (2.86) with...”

“Note that the relativistic collisionless Boltzmann equation, namely (2.86) with...”
A Kinetic-Theory Description of Fluids xi

• Page 95, second line of Sec. 2.3.4. Change

“...we multiply the relativistic Maxwell–Boltzmann equation (2.86) by...”



“...we multiply the relativistic Boltzmann equation (2.86) by...”
• Page 95, after Eq. (2.110). Change

“...can be transformed into a volume integral in momentum space...”



“...can be transformed into a surface integral in momentum space...”
• Page 97, second line of Sec. 2.3.6. Change

“...is a solution of the relativistic Maxwell–Boltzmann equation (2.86)...”



“...is a solution of the relativistic Boltzmann equation (2.86)...”
• Page 107, Eq. (2.168). Change
 
∂p
c2s := ,
∂e s

 
∂p
c2s := c 2
,
∂e s

• Page 108, Eq. (2.171). Change


1 2
c2s = (c ) .
h s N

c2 2
c2s = (c ) .
h s N
• Page 108, Eq. (2.175). Change
 
3 3
G > c2s , G < c2s .
2 2

3 c2s 3 c2s
 
G > , G < .
2 c2 2 c2
• Page 108, Eq. (2.172) and (2.173). Change
  
1
dp d ln h
c2s = = , (2.1)
h
dρ s d ln ρ s
"    # "    #
1 ∂p d ∂p 1 ∂p p ∂p
= + = + . (2.2)
h ∂ρ  dρ ∂ ρ h ∂ρ  ρ2 ∂ ρ

xii A Kinetic-Theory Description of Fluids

c2
   
dp d ln h
c2s = =c 2
, (2.3)
h dρ s d ln ρ s
"  # "    #
c2 c2
 
∂p d ∂p ∂p p ∂p
= + = + . (2.4)
h ∂ρ  dρ ∂ ρ h ∂ρ  ρ2 ∂ ρ

• Page 116, Eq. (2.232). Change

p(5ρh − 8p)
c2s = ,
3ρh(ρh − p)

p(5ρh − 8p)
c2s = c2 ,
3ρh(ρh − p)
• Page 117, Eq. (2.234). Change
h − c2
 
γ(γ − 1) γp
c2s = 2 = (γ − 1) = .
c + γ h ρh

c2 γ(γ − 1) c2 (h − c2 )(γ − 1) c2 γp
c2s = = = .
c2 + γ h ρh
• Page 118, footnote 34. Change

“A fluid obeying the ideal-fluid equation of state with  = 0 would also have a zero
temperature and could provide a reasonable model for a cold and old neutron star.”

“A fluid obeying a general polytropic equation of state can have, at least mathematically,
 = 0, although such a choice would be difficult to justify from a physical point of
view. However, if the polytropic transformation is isentropic, then the specific internal
energy is fully determined and is proportional to the rest-mass density [cf. Eq. (2.248)
and discussion around it]. A polytropic and isentropic equation of state is often used to
obtain a reasonable approximation of the description of matter of a cold and old neutron
star.
• Page 119, after Eq. (2.247)
Put differently, a polytropic equation of state is equivalent to an ideal-fluid equation of
state only under those isentropic transformations for which the adiabatic index of the
fluid γ is the same as the adiabatic index of the polytrope Γ.”

“Put differently, if a fluid obeys the ideal-fluid equation of state and is isentropic, then
its equation of state can also be written in a polytropic form [cf., Eq. (2.242)], with
polytropic exponent Γ = γ; in this case, the polytropic exponent is also the adiabatic
index. On the other hand, if a fluid obeys the polytropic equation of state and is isentropic,
then it is at least formally possible to express the pressure as p = ρ(Γ − 1) [cf., Eq.
(2.228)]. However, this does not necessarily mean that such a fluid obeys an ideal-fluid
equation of state. For this to be the case, Γ must be the ratio of the specific heats cp /cV
and the specific internal energy must be a function of the temperature only.”
A Kinetic-Theory Description of Fluids xiii

• Page 119, Eq. (2.249). Change


 −1
Γp Γ(Γ − 1)p 1 1
c2s = = = + .
ρh ρ(Γ − 1) + Γp ΓKρΓ−1 Γ−1

 −1
2 Γp Γ(Γ − 1)p 1 1
c2s =c =c 2
= c2 + .
ρh ρ(Γ − 1) + Γp ΓKρΓ−1 Γ−1
3
Relativistic Perfect Fluids

• Page 139, before Eq. (3.28). Change The simplest quantity to determine is the rest-mass
density current, namely → The simplest quantity to determine is the rest-mass current,
namely
• Page 139, before Eq. (3.28). Change

J µ̂ : flux of rest-mass current density in the µ̂-direction,



J µ̂ : flux of rest-mass in the µ̂-direction,
• Page 139, before Eq. (3.29). Change

T 0̂0̂ : total energy density,


T 0̂î : flux of energy density in î-th direction,
T î0̂ : flux of î-momentum in 0̂-th direction (î-momentum density),
T ĵ î : flux of ĵ-th component of momentum density in î-th direction .

T 0̂0̂ : total energy density,
T 0̂î : flux of energy in î-th direction,
T î0̂ : flux of î-momentum in 0̂-th direction ,
T ĵ î : flux of ĵ-momentum in î-th direction .
• Page 139, (3.29). Change the second line as follows:
T 0̂î = T 0̂î = 0 ,

T 0̂î = T î0̂ = 0 ,
• Page 146, Eq. (3.69). Change
1
Lu (huµ ) = − ∇µ p − ∇µ h .
ρ

1
Lu (huµ ) = − ∇µ p = −∇µ h .
ρ
Relativistic Perfect Fluids xv

• Page 146, Eq. (3.71). Change

ξ µ ∇µ p 1
Lu (huµ ξ µ ) = − − ξ µ ∇µ h = − Lξ p − Lξ h ,
ρ ρ

ξ µ ∇µ p 1
Lu (huµ ξ µ ) = − = − Lξ p = −Lξ h ,
ρ ρ
• Page 146, before Eq. (3.72). Change
“and thus use the condition (3.65) with Lu p = 0 and Lu h = 0, to finally obtain”

“and thus use the condition (3.65) with Lξ p = 0 to finally obtain”
• Page 146, after Eq. (3.72). Change
Note the similarity between expression (3.72) and the corresponding equation (1.185)
along geodesic trajectories, i.e., Lu (uµ ξ µ ).

Note the similarity between expression (3.72) and the corresponding equation (1.185)
along geodesic trajectories, i.e., Lu (uµ ξ µ ) = 0.
• Page 155, caption of Fig. 3.4. Change
... Show with blue solid lines

... Shown with blue solid lines

• Page 177, Eq. (3.253). Change


Z
PRαβ := Iν N α N β dνdΩ .


Z
PRαβ := hαγ hβδ TRγδ = hαγ hβδ Iν N γ N δ dνdΩ .

• Page 179, footnote 26. Change


“Multifluids of this type as sometimes also referred to as...”

“Multifluids of this type are sometimes also referred to as...”
4
Linear and Nonlinear Hydrodynamic
Waves

• Page 200, Eq. (4.54). Change


det(At − λAx ) = 0 ,

det(Ax − λAt ) = 0 ,
• Page 213, Fig. 4.5. The tangents to the fluidlines on either side of the rarefaction tail
should be exactly the same and not as shown.
• Page 216, below Eq. (4.114). Change
“ It is also convenient to rewrite the continuity equation (4.112) and the conservation of
energy (4.113)”

“ It is also convenient to rewrite the continuity equation (4.112) and the conservation of
momentum (4.113)”
• Page 216. Change Eq. (4.117) as follows
 
2 2 ha hb
(hb Wb vb ) − (ha Wa va ) = − + JpK .
ρa ρb
→  
ha hb
(hb Wb vb )2 − (ha Wa va )2 = + JpK .
ρa ρb
• Page 217, first paragraph. Change
“The classical Hugoniot adiabat is readily obtained from (4.118) after recalling that in
the Newtonian limit hN = 1 +  + p/ρ ≈ 1”

“The classical Hugoniot adiabat is readily obtained from (4.118) after recalling that in
the Newtonian limit h = 1 +  + p/ρ ≈ 1”
• Page 221, Eq. (4.138). Change

2 (3ea + eb )(3eb + ea ) 4
Wab = = Wa2 Wb2 ,
16e1 e2 9

2 (3ea + eb )(3eb + ea ) 4
Wab = = Wa2 Wb2 ,
16ea eb 9
Linear and Nonlinear Hydrodynamic Waves xvii

• Page 222, after Eq. (4.141), the expression for the shock velocity should be modified as
follows:

VS± = ρb Wb vb /(ρb Wb ± ρa )

VS± = ρb Wb vb /(ρb Wb ∓ ρa )
• Page 225, Fig. 4.11, panel on bottom right. The labels in the spacetime diagram should
be corrected as follows:
R← → R→ and S→ → S← .
• Page 228, last sentence in the first paragraph should be modified as follows:

These values mark the transition from one wave pattern to another one, and that are
directly computed from the initial conditions (Rezzolla and Zanotti, 2001).

These values mark the transition from one wave pattern to another one, and are directly
computed from the initial conditions (Rezzolla and Zanotti, 2001).
5
Reaction Fronts: Detonations and
Deflagrations

• Page 284, problem 2. Change


“Derive the inequalities (5.4)–(5.6) across a reaction front [Hint: start from the laws of
conservation of momentum and energy (4.114)–(4.113)].

“Derive the inequalities (5.4)–(5.6) across a reaction front [Hint: start from the laws of
conservation of momentum and energy (4.113)–(4.114)].
6
Relativistic Non-Perfect Fluids

• Page 297, Eq. (6.73). Change: χ → χt


• Page 301, Eq. (6.85). Change:

   
1 β1 µ
qν = −κ Dν ln T + aν + β1 q̇ν + T ∇µ u qν ,
2 T

   
1 β1 µ
qν = −κT Dν ln T + aν + β1 q̇ν + T ∇µ u qν ,
2 T

• Page 306: invert the inequalities in Eqs. (6.115) and (6.116).


7
Formulations of the Einstein–Euler
Equations

• Page 337, Eq. (7.100). Change


1
Γ̃ijk = Γijk − (δji Γm i m il m
km + δk Γjm − γjk γ Γlm ) = Γijk + 2(δji ∂k ln φ + δki ∂j ln φ − γjk γ il ∂l ln φ) ,
3

1
Γ̃ijk = Γijk − (δji Γm i m il m
km + δk Γjm − γjk γ Γlm ) = Γijk + δji ∂k ln φ + δki ∂j ln φ − γjk γ il ∂l ln φ ,
3
• Page 339, Eq. (7.108). Change
(3) 1
R + K 2 = K ij Kij + 4πE = Ãij Ãij + K 2 + 4πE ,
3

(3) 1
R + K 2 = K ij Kij + 4πE = Ãij Ãij + K 2 + 16πE ,
3
• Page 339, last two lines:
(note that γ̃ij and Ãij , have only five independent components each since they are trace-
less)

(note that γ̃ij and Ãij , have only five independent components each since they have traces
that are equal to three or zero, respectively)
• Page 345, first term in Eq (7.131). Change

Dj Θij = 0 ,


Dj Θij = 0 ,
• Page 345, Eq (7.132). Change
1 1
Σij := Θij − γij Θkl Θkl = γ 1/3 Lt γ̄ij ,
3 2

1 1
Σij := Θij − γij Θkl γ kl = γ 1/3 Lt γ̃ij ,
3 2
Formulations of the Einstein–Euler Equations xxi

• Page 345, after Eq (7.132). Change


where γ̄ij := γ −1/3 γij is the conformal metric.

where γ̃ij := γ −1/3 γij is the conformal metric.
• Page 345, first term in Eq (7.133). Change
Dj Σij = 0 ,

Dj Σij = 0 ,
• Page 354, first line. Change
“constraint decouples from the Hamiltonian constraint and it is possible to solve the latter
to obtain the three vectors V̄ i ”

“constraint decouples from the Hamiltonian constraint and it is possible to solve the
former to obtain the three vectors V̄ i ”
• Page 354, fourth line. Change
“The calculation of initial data via the solution of the constrains simplifies considerably
if”

“The calculation of initial data via the solution of the constraints simplifies considerably
if”
• Page 356, first sentence before Eq. (7.180). Change
“we further introduce the conformal metric γ̄ [cf., Eq. (7.152)], such that”

“we further introduce the conformal metric γ̃ [cf., Eq. (7.152), although we here use a
tilde rather than a bar to be closer to the notation of Bonazzola et al. (2004)], such that”
• Page 356, Eq. (7.180). Change
f := det(fij ) = γ̄ := det(γ̄ij ) ,

f := det(fij ) = γ̃ := det(γ̃ij ) ,
• Page 356, Eq. (7.181). Change
ψ = (γ/γ̄)1/12 = (γ/f )1/12 .

ψ = (γ/γ̃)1/12 = (γ/f )1/12 .
• Page 384, second equation in Exercise 7. Change
1 1
Di Dj φ = − D̃i D̃j + 2 ∂i φ ∂j φ .
2φ 2φ

2 1
Di Dj φ = D̃i D̃j φ + ∂i φ ∂j φ − γij ∂ k φ ∂k φ .
φ φ
8
Numerical Relativistic
Hydrodynamics: Finite-Difference
Methods

• Page 393, Eq. (8.16). Change


(h)
j = C̃hp̃j + O(hp̃j +1 ) ,


(h)
j = Chpj + O(hpj +1 ) ,

• Page 393, below Eq. (8.16). Change “with C̃ a constant” to “with C a constant”.
• Page 393, Eq. (8.30). Change
log R(h, k)
p̃ := ,
log(h/k)

log |R(h, k)|
p̃ := ,
log(h/k)
• Page 395, the 7th line before Eq. (8.37). Change

“...its application across a time interval ∆t introduces an associate truncation error j (h).”

“...its application across a time interval ∆t introduces an associated truncation error
(h).”
• Page 406, Eq. (8.87). Change
2 2
ũ(x, t) = e−εk t eik[x−(v+βk )t] ,

→ 2 2
ũ(x, t) = e−εk t eik[x−(λ+βk )t] ,
10
Numerical Relativistic
Hydrodynamics: High-Order
Methods

• Page 464, Eq. (10.14). Change


Z 1
Aik := Ψk (ξ)dξ , ∀ Ii ∈ Sjl .
0

Z
Aik := Ψk (ξ)dξ , ∀ Ii ∈ Sjl .
Ii
11
Relativistic Hydrodynamics of
Non-Selfgravitating Fluids

• Page 518, Eq. (11.84). Change


dW M u
= 2 dr + du .
W r W W

dW M u
= 2 2 dr + 2 du .
W r W W
12
Relativistic Hydrodynamics of
Selfgravitating Fluids

• Page 596, 12th line after Eq. (12.13)


“M = 2.01 ± 0.4 M ” → “M = 2.01 ± 0.04 M ”
• Page 597, caption of Fig. 12.1
“M = 2.01 ± 0.4 M ” → “M = 2.01 ± 0.04 M ”
• Page 601, second term in Eq. (12.31). Change

ε(1 + wR )2
 
2 1
H0 = 2 1 − .
Ri wi

ε(1 + wi )2
 
2 1
H0 = 2 1 − .
Ri wi
• Page 601, second paragraph, change:
... the energy density ρ(r) and the pressure p(r) ...

... the energy density e(r) and the pressure p(r) ...
• Page 606, caption of Fig. 12.4:
“K = 100” → “K = 164”
• Page 606, second but last line:
“K = 100” → “K = 164”

You might also like