Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 2 views

    Organizational Culture and Climate On Group Process and Team Building

    Uploaded by

    kenata
    The objective of this paper was to discuss how organizational culture and climate influence the process of group processing and team building

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Organizational Culture and Climate On Group Process and Team Building

    Uploaded by

    kenata
    2 views2 pages
    The objective of this paper was to discuss how organizational culture and climate influence the process of group processing and team building

    Original Title

    Organizational Culture and Climate on Group Process and Team Building

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The objective of this paper was to discuss how organizational culture and climate influence the process of group processing and team building

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    2 views2 pages

    Organizational Culture and Climate On Group Process and Team Building

    Uploaded by

    kenata
    The objective of this paper was to discuss how organizational culture and climate influence the process of group processing and team building

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 2

    Organizational Culture and Climate on Group Process and Team Building

    Discuss how the perspectives for the PICOT differ depending on the discipline represented by

    each stakeholder? What impact will they have on the group process and in team building? How

    is the group process and team building effected by the organization's culture and climate of

    transparency and safety? How will the outcomes of the committee be impacted?

    The perspective for the PICOT are dependent on stakeholders’ perception regarding their

    feeling about the arrival to provider time. As witnessed in our weekly reading, we had divergent

    views about the time arrival to provider should be. Nonetheless, we were in agreement about the

    busy queue in the emergency department (Mannion, 2018). The stakeholders play critical role in

    ensuring that service delivery and patient care in emergency room is effective and efficient to

    minimize waiting time. A section of stakeholder particularly patients have raised concerns about

    long waiting time. These concerns heightens stress levels among other stakeholders particularly

    the physicians and nurses, which significantly affects their productivity and service delivery.

    The effective triage and incorporating assessment of care at the initial stage have positive

    impact on the group process and team building. By fast tracking these areas with triaging enables

    the service providers and the nursing staff to significantly reduce wait time and crowding in ED

    as well as patient flow. This means that the group process created by the physicians, leadership,

    and the team of staff have positive influence on the organizational culture and climate (Patey, C.,

    2019). For instance, there will be upfront transparency for patient safety measures in place to

    adequately triage patient care. The flow in emergency room culture indicate a positive impact on

    the environmental hospital setting, patient’s and staff’s outcome. Therefore, adding triage

    specific nurses and staff reduces wait time and long queue, and admissions that are not

    necessary.
    References

    Mannion, R. (2018). Understanding Organisational Culture for Healthcare Quality Improvement.

    BMJ, 363: 1-4.

    Patey, C. (2019). SurgeCon: Priming a Community Emergency Department for Patient Flow

    Managemet. Western Journal of Emergency Medicine, 20(4): 654-665.

    You might also like