1
5.3 x P(x) x·P(x) (x-µ)2 (x-µ)2·P(x)
0 .461 .000 0.913936 0.421324
1 .285 .285 0.001936 0.000552
2 .129 .258 1.089936 0.140602
3 .087 .261 4.177936 0.363480
4 .038 .152 9.265936 0.352106
E(x) = µ = [x·P(x)]= 0.956 = [(x-µ) ·P(x)] = 1.278064
2 2
= 1.278064 = 1.1305
5.4 x P(x) x·P(x) (x-µ)2 (x-µ)2·P(x)
0 .262 .000 1.4424 0.37791
1 .393 .393 0.0404 0.01588
2 .246 .492 0.6384 0.15705
3 .082 .246 3.2364 0.26538
4 .015 .060 7.8344 0.11752
5 .002 .010 14.4324 0.02886
6 .000 .000 23.0304 0.00000
µ = [x·P(x)] = 1.201 = [(x-µ) ·P(x)] = 0.96260
2 2
= .96260 = .98112
5.5 c) n = 10 p = .60 q = .40
P(x > 7) = P(x=7) + P(x=8) + P(x=9) + P(x=10) =
7 3 8 2 9 1 10 0
10C7(.60) (.40) + 10C8(.60) (.40) + 10C9(.60) (.40) +10C10(.60) (.40) =
120(.0280)(.064) + 45(.0168)(.16) + 10(.0101)(.40) + 1(.0060)(1) =
.2150 + .1209 + .0403 + .0060 = .3822
d) n = 12 p = .45 q = .55
P(5 < x < 7) = P(x=5) + P(x=6) + P(x=7) =
5 7 6 6 7 5
12C5(.45) (.55) + 12C6(.45) (.55) + 12C7(.45) (.55) =
792(.0185)(.0152) + 924(.0083)(.0277) + 792(.0037)(.0503) =
.2225 + .2124 + .1489 = .5838
2
5.6 By Table A.2:
c) n = 20 p = .70
P(x < 12) = P(x=11) + P(x=10) + P(x=9) + ... + P(x=0) =
.065 + .031 + .012 + .004 + .001 + .000 = .113
e) n = 15 p = .40
P(4 < x < 9) =
P(x=4) + P(x=5) + P(x=6) + P(x=7) + P(x=8) + P(x=9) =
.127 + .186 + .207 + .177 + .118 + .061 = .876
f) n = 10 p = .60
P(x > 7) = P(x=7) + P(x=8) + P(x=9) + P(x=10) =
.215 + .121 + .040 + .006 = .382
5.7 a) n = 20 p = .70 q = .30
µ = np = 20(.70) = 14
= n p q 20(.70)(.30) 4.2 = 2.05
b) n = 70 p = .35 q = .65
µ = np = 70(.35) = 24.5
= n p q 70(.35)(.65) 15.925 = 3.99
c) n = 100 p = .50 q = .50
µ = np = 100(.50) = 50
= n p q 100(.50)(.50) 25 = 5
3
5.11 a) n = 20 p = .27 x=8
20C8 (.27)8(.73)12 = 125,970(.000028243)(.022902) = .0815
b) n = 20 p = .30 x=0
20C0 (.30) 0(.70)20 = (1)(1)(.0007979) = .0007979
c) n = 20 p = .30 x>7
Use table A.2:
P(x=8) + P(x=9) + . . . + P(x=14)=
.114 + .065 + .031 + .012 + .004 + .001 + .000 + … = .227
5.13 n = 25 p = .60
a) x > 15
P(x > 15) = P(x = 15) + P(x = 16) + · · · + P(x = 25)
Using Table A.2 n = 25, p = .60
x Prob
15 .161
16 .151
17 .120
18 .080
19 .044
20 .020
21 .007
22 .002
.585
b) x > 20
P(x > 20) = P(x = 21) + P(x = 22) + P(x = 23) + P(x = 24) + P(x = 25) =
Using Table A.2 n = 25, p = .60
.007 + .002 + .000 + .000 + .000 = .009
c) P(x < 10)
4
Using Table A.2 n = 25, p = .60 and x = 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
x Prob.
9 .009
8 .003
7 .001
<6 .000
.013
5.17
3.9 2 e 3.9 (15.21)(.020242)
b) P(x=2 = 3.9) = = .1539
2! 2
c) P(x < 3 = 4.1) = P(x=3) + P(x=2) + P(x=1) + P(x=0) =
4.13 e 4.1 (68.921)(.016573)
= .1904
3! 6
4.12 e 4.1 (16.81)(.016573)
= .1393
2! 2
4.11 e 4.1 (4.1)(.016573)
= .0679
1! 1
4.10 e 4.1 (1)(.016573)
= .0166
0! 1
.1904 + .1393 + .0679 + .0166 = .4142
5
5.20 = 2.84 minutes
a) P(x=6 = 2.8)
from Table A.3 .0407
b) P(x=0 = 2.8) =
from Table A.3 .0608
c) Unable to meet demand if x > 44 minutes:
x Prob.
5 .0872
6 .0407
7 .0163
8 .0057
9 .0018
10 .0005
11 .0001
.1523
There is a .1523 probability of being unable to meet the demand.
Probability of meeting the demand = 1 - (.1523) = .8477
15.23% of the time a second window will need to be opened.
d) = 2.8 arrivals4 minutes
P(x=3) arrivals2 minutes = ??
Lambda must be changed to the same interval (½ the size)
New lambda=1.4 arrivals2 minutes
P(x=3)=1.4) = from Table A.3 = .1128
P(x > 5 8 minutes) = ??
Lambda must be changed to the same interval(twice the size):
New lambda = 5.6 arrivals8 minutes
P(x > 5 = 5.6):
6
From Table A.3: x Prob.
5 .1697
6 .1584
7 .1267
8 .0887
9 .0552
10 .0309
11 .0157
12 .0073
13 .0032
14 .0013
15 .0005
16 .0002
17 .0001
.6579
5.32 N = 16 A = 4 defective n=3
C 0 12 C3 (1)(220)
a) P(x = 0) = 4
= .3929
C
16 3 560
C3 12 C 0 (4)(1)
b) P(x = 3) = 4
= .0071
16 C 3 560
C C
c) P(x > 2) = P(x=2) + P(x=3) = 4 2 12 1 + .0071 (from part b.) =
16 C 3
(6)(12) + .0071 = .1286 + .0071 = .1357
560
d) P(x < 1) = P(x=1) + P(x=0) =
C1 12 C 2
4 (4)(66)
+ .3929 (from part a.) = + .3929 = .4714 + .3929 = .8643
16 C 3 560
5.33 N = 18 A = 11 Hispanic n=5
P(x < 1) = P(1) + P(0) =
C1 7 C 4 C 0 7 C5 (11)(35) (1)( 21)
11
+ 11
= = .0449 + .0025 = .0474
18 C 5 18 C 5 8568 8568
It is fairly unlikely that these results occur by chance. A researcher might want to
further investigate this result to determine causes. Were officers selected based on
leadership, years of service, dedication, prejudice, or some other reason?