0% found this document useful (0 votes)
18 views2 pages

RBAC

Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as TXT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
18 views2 pages

RBAC

Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as TXT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

For Role-Based Access Control (RBAC) in database design, here’s a common and

scalable schema approach:

1. Key Tables:
Users Table: Stores information about each user, with unique identifiers.
Roles Table: Stores roles, such as "Admin," "Editor," "Viewer," etc. Each role
represents a specific set of permissions.
Permissions Table: Defines permissions, like "read," "write," "delete," etc., and
assigns them to actions or resources within the system.
Role-Permissions Table: A junction table linking Roles and Permissions. This allows
for assigning multiple permissions to a single role, forming a many-to-many
relationship.
User-Roles Table: A junction table that links Users to Roles. Users can have
multiple roles, and roles can be assigned to multiple users.
2. Database Schema Example:
Here's a simplified structure:

plaintext
Copy code
Users
------
- user_id (Primary Key)
- username
- email
- password

Roles
-----
- role_id (Primary Key)
- role_name

Permissions
-----------
- permission_id (Primary Key)
- permission_name

Role_Permissions
----------------
- role_id (Foreign Key, references Roles.role_id)
- permission_id (Foreign Key, references Permissions.permission_id)

User_Roles
----------
- user_id (Foreign Key, references Users.user_id)
- role_id (Foreign Key, references Roles.role_id)
3. Advantages of This Schema:
Scalability: Easily add new roles or permissions without altering the structure.
Reusability: Permissions are decoupled from specific users, enabling flexible
assignment.
Simplified Auditing: Permissions can be traced through roles, making auditing more
straightforward.
4. Additional Considerations:
Hierarchical Roles: Implement role hierarchies if higher-level roles inherit
permissions from lower-level roles.
Policy Constraints: Some systems require additional conditions (e.g., time
constraints, IP ranges) which can be implemented as additional columns in the
Permissions or as a separate Policies table.
Caching: For large systems, caching user-role-permission relationships can improve
performance, especially for frequently checked permissions.
5. Example Query:
To check if a user has a specific permission:

sql
Copy code
SELECT 1
FROM Users u
JOIN User_Roles ur ON u.user_id = ur.user_id
JOIN Roles r ON ur.role_id = r.role_id
JOIN Role_Permissions rp ON r.role_id = rp.role_id
JOIN Permissions p ON rp.permission_id = p.permission_id
WHERE u.user_id = [User_ID] AND p.permission_name = [Permission];
This schema provides flexibility for complex permission requirements while
remaining efficient for querying.

You might also like