Lecture1 Real Numbers Students
Lecture1 Real Numbers Students
Lecture1 Real Numbers Students
N Z:
R6_ (91 2 R f0g) (8x 2 R) : 1:x = x:1 = x existence of the multiplicative identity
element
1
R7_ (8x 2 R f0g) (9x 2R f0g) : x 1 :x = x:x 1
= 1 existence of the multiplica-
tive inverse
De…nition 5.
1. x 0 = 0
2. ( x) :y = xy
3. x ( y) = (xy) = (xy)
4. x 0, x 0
5. x y, x y
1. One has
x 0 = x (0 + 0) = x:0 + x:0 ) x:0 = 0:
2. since ( x) + x = 0; we have
xy + ( x) y = [x + ( x)] y = 0:y = 0
) xy = ( x) y
Example 2.1. What can we say about a real number x such that:
na > b:
1
And if instead of b we write , where " > 0, then we get:
"
Axiom 2. If " is an arbitrary positive number, then there exists a natural number n such
1
that < "
n
An important consequence of the axiom of Archimedes is that the rational numbers are
“everywhere dense”within the real numbers.
Theorem 2. There exists a rational number between any two real numbers
3 The absolute value of a real number
De…nition 6. The absolute value of a real a is de…ned by
8
< x if x > 0
jxj = 0 if x = 0
:
x if x < 0
3.0.2 Properties
Let x; y in R
1. jxj = 0 , x = 0
2. jxj x jxj
3. 8a > 0 : jxj a, a x a
5.
jx + yj2 = (x + y)2
= x2 + y 2 + 2xy
= jxj2 + jyj2 + 2xy
we know that
8a 2 R; a jaj
then
6. We write
jxj = j(x y) + yj
by the triangular inequality, we get
jx + yj jxj jyj
+
1 + jx + yj 1 + jxj 1 + jyj
4 Intervals in R
The naive de…nition of a real interval is the set of all real numbers lying between any two
numbers. More precisely
1
A= ;n 2 N
n
1 1
A is not an interval. For example, if we take a = and b = which are elements of A
2 3
2
and x = which lies between a and b but it is not in A
5
We distinguish several forms of intervals:
4.0.3 1-Bounded intervals
Let a and b in R such that b > a
Open interval The set fx 2 R : a < x < bg is called open interval and we give this usual
notation
]a; b[= fx 2 R; a < x < bg
The points a and b are called the endpoints of the interval. Furthermore, one has
]a; a[ = ;:
]a; b] = fx 2 R; a < x bg
1. 8k 2 Z; E(x + k) = E(x) + k
0 x 2 Z;
2. E(x) + E( x) =
1 x 2 R=Z:
3. x 1 < E(x) x
4. x y ) E(x) E(y)
E(x + k) = E(x) + k
E(x) 6= x
then
E( x) = E(x) 1:
n + m = 2k;
which gives
n+m
E =k
2
Furthermore, we have
n m+1 2k m m+1 1
= =k m+
2 2 2
n+m
Since m 2 Z and based on the previous proposition, we have
2
n m+1 1
E =k m+E =k m
2 2
Therefore
n+m n m+1
E( ) + E( ) = 2k m=n
2 2
2. Second case: If n + m is odd, then
n + m = 2k + 1;
and
n+m 2k + 1 +1
E =E =k+E =k
2 2 2
we observe that
n m + 1 = 2k + 1 m m+1
which is even since it is the sum of two even integer. Thus
n m+1 2k + 1 m m+1
E =E =k+1 2m
2 2
. We also
n+m n m + 1 + 2m 1
E( ) = E( )=k+k+1 2m
2 2
Hence
n+m n m+1
E( ) + E( ) = n:
2 2
Exercise 5. Show that for all n 2 Z, prove that
n 1 n+2 n+4
E( ) + E( ) + E( )=n
2 4 4
We will consider 4 cases: 8
>
> n = 4k
<
n = 4k + 1
>
> n = 4k + 3
:
n = 4k + 3
For the …st situation one has
n n+21 n+4
E( ) + E(
) + E( )
2 4 4
4k 1 4k + 2 4k + 4
= E( ) + E( ) + E( )
2 4 4
1 1
= E(2k ) + E(k + ) + E(k + 1)
2 2
1 1
= 2k + E( ) + k + E(+ ) + k + 1
2 2
= 2k + ( 1) + k + 0 + k + 1
= 4k = n
One has
p p p p
E ( n + n + 1)2 = E (n + n + 1 + 2 n2 + n = 2n + 1 + E 2 n2 + n
recall that
2
2 1 1
n +n= n+
2 4
then,
2
2 2 1
n n +n< n+
2
s
p p 2
1
) n2 n2 + n < n+
2
s
p p 2
1
) 2 n2 2 n2 + n < 2 n+
2
p
) 2n 2 n2 + n < 2n + 1
the uniqueness of the integer part implies that
p
E(2 n2 + n) = 2n:
then,
p p
E ( n + n + 1)2 = 4n + 1
then p
(n + 1) < n2 + 3n + 4 < n + 2 = (n + 1) + 1
the uniqueness of the integer part implies that
p
E n2 + 3n + 4 ) = n + 1:
6 Upper Bounds
Let S R be a no empty set.
De…nition 8. We say "a set S is bounded above" if there exists a number M such that
8x 2 S : x M:
Remark 3. If A has an upper bound M , one can easily …nd other upper bounds, such
as M + 1; M + 2;
Remark 4. An upper bound of a set A, may or may not belongs to the set A.
8x 2 S : x m:
M = sup(A);
if and only if
8
< M is an upper bound of A,i.e 8x 2 A,x M
:
If M 0 is another upper bound of A; then M M0
In the other words, M is the smallest among all the upper bounds of A.
m = inf(A);
if and only if
8
< m is a lower bound of A,i.e 8x 2 A,x m
:
If m0 is another lower bound of A; then m m0
In the other words, m is the largest among all the lower bounds of A
Example 11. If a < b, then b = sup[a; b] = sup[a; b) and a = inf[a; b] = inf(a; b]:
Example 12. If S = fq 2 Q : e < q < g, then inf S = e, sup S =
p p
Example 13. If S = fx 2 R : x2 < 3g, then inf S = 3, sup S = 3
Let A R be a non empty subset
Proposition 3. The supremum or in…mum of a set A is unique if it exists . More-
over, if both exist, then
inf A sup A:
Proposition 4. Every non empty set of real numbers that is bounded from above has a supremum ,
and every non empty set of real numbers that is bounded from below has an in…mum
Proposition 5. if A is bounded above, the supremum of A i.e M = supA is the unique real
number satisfying
8
< M is an upper bound of A,i.e 8x 2 A,x M
:
8" > 0; 9x 2 A ; M "<x M
Proposition 6. if A is bounded below, the in…mum of A i.e m = inf A is the unique real
number satisfying
8
< m is an lower bound of A,i.e 8x 2 A,x m
:
8" > 0; 9x 2 A ; m x<m+"
Remark 5. There are four possibilities for a non empty subset S of R:it can
n+3
A= xn = n ;n 2 N
4
+1
but
1 1 1 1 4 4
n+4 4) ) ) 1)4 4 1=3
n+4 4 n+4 4 n+4 n+4
then,
xn 3
on the other hand, one has
1 4 4
n 0)n+4>4>0) >0) <0)4 <4
n+4 n+4 n+4
then,
xn < 4:
Summing up
xn 2 [3; 4[
which implies
min A = inf A = 3; sup A = 4
Let us that sup A = 4: In fact,
8
< 4 is an upper bound of A,i.e 8an 2 A,an 4
sup A = 4 ,
:
8" > 0; 9an 2 A ; 4 " < an 4
4 " < an
1 2
B= yn = + + 4; n 2 N
n2 n
then,
1 2 1 2
yn < 4 + " ) 2
+ +4<4+") 2 + <"
n n n n
then
2 2
<")n>
n "
it su¢ ces to take
2
n0 = + 1:
"
Exercise 9. Find the supremum and in…mum of each sets ( if they exist) where
1 p p
A = [0; 1]; B =]0; 1[; C = f1 ; n 2 N g; D = f 2n n + 2; n 2 N g
n
1. A is bounded above by 1 and bounded below by 0, so the lower and upper bounds
exist and are respectively 0 and 1
2. B is bounded above by 1 and bounded below by 0, so the lower and upper bounds
exist and are respectively 0 and 1
Exercise 12. Let A and B two non empty subsets of R and f :A B ! R bounded. Compare
between
inf(sup(f (x; y); x 2 A); y 2 B)
and
sup(inf(f (x; y); y 2 B); x 2 A):
Let us move to the lower bound in this inequality for y2B. we obtain
sup [inf(f (x0 ; y); y 2 B)] ; x0 2 A inf(sup(f (x; y); x 2 A); y 2 B):
Exercise 13. Let A and B be two non empty, bounded subsets of R. Show that;
1. A B then
inf B inf A sup A sup B;
3. If A \ B = ; , one have
3. Inductive Step: Show that the statement P(n) is true for n + 1:i.e
1 1 1 1 1 n+1
+ + + ::::: + + =
1 2 2 3 3 4 n (n + 1) (n + 1) (n + 2) n+2
One has
!
1 1 1 1 1
+ + + ::::: + +
1 2 2 3 3 4 n (n + 1) (n + 1) (n + 2)
n
n +!1
n 1
= +
n + 1 (n + 1) (n + 2)
n2 + 2n + 1
=
(n + 1) (n + 2)
n+1
=
n+2
So P(n + 1) is correct. Hence by mathematical induction P(n) is correct.
Exercise 15. Show that for all n 2 N
n (n + 1)
1 + 2 + 3 + ::: + n =
2
Let P(n) be the statement that
n (n + 1)
1 + 2 + 3 + ::: + n =
2
1. Base Case: When n = 1 the left hand side of the equation is 1 and the right hand
1 (1 + 1)
side is So P(1) is correct.
2
2. Induction Hypothesis: Assume that the statement P(n) is true for any positive
integer n for some n 1.
n (n + 1)
P(n) : 8n 2 N; 1 + 2 + 3 + ::: + n = is true
2
3. Inductive Step: Show that the statement P(n) is true for n + 1:i.e
(n + 1) (n + 2)
1 + 2 + 3 + ::: + n + 1 =
2
One has
!
1 + 2 + 3 + ::: + n + (n + 1)
n (n + 1)
2 !
n (n + 1)
= + (n + 1)
2
n (n + 1) 2
= + (n + 1)
2 2
(n + 1) (n + 2)
=
2
So P(n + 1) is correct. Hence by mathematical induction P(n) is correct.
n (3n 1)
P(n) : 8n 1:1+4+7+ + (3n 2) = is true
2
3. Inductive Step: Show that the statement P(n) is true for n + 1:i.e
(n + 1) (3 (n + 1) 1)
1+4+7+ + (3 (n + 1) 2) =
2
it means
(n + 1) (3n + 2)
1+4+7+ + (3n + 1) =
2
One has
!
1+4+7+ + +(3n 2) + (3n + 1)
n (3n 1)
2 !
n (3n 1)
= + (3n + 1)
2
n (3n 1) 2
= + (3n + 1)
2 2
2
3n + 5n + 2
=
2
(n + 1) (3n + 2)
=
2
So P(n + 1) is correct. Hence by mathematical induction P(n) is correct
Exercise 17. Verify that for all n 1, the sum of the squares of the …rst 2n positive integers
is given by the formula
n (2n + 1) (4n + 1)
12 + 22 + 42 + ::: + (2n)2 =
3
1. Base Case. The statement P (1) says that
1 (2 (1) + 1) (4 (1) + 1) 15
12 + 22 = 5 = = =5
3 3
which is true
2. Induction Hypothesis: Assume that the statement P(n) is true for any positive
integer n for some n 1.
n (2n + 1) (4n + 1)
P(n) : 8n 1 : 12 + 22 + 42 + ::: + (2n)2 = is true
3
1. Inductive Step: Show that the statement P(n) is true for n + 1:i.e
(n + 1) (2 (n + 1) + 1) (4 (n + 1) + 1)
12 + 22 + 42 + ::: + (2n)2 + (n + 1)2 =
3
One has
12 + 22 + 42 + ::: + (2n)2 + (2 (n + 1))2
n (2n + 1) (4n + 1)
= + (2n + 1)2 + (2n + 2)2
3
n (2n + 1) (4n + 1) 3 3
= + (2n + 1)2 + (2n + 2)2
3 3 3
8n3 + 30n2 + 37n + 15
=
3
On the other side of P(n + 1) is
(n + 1) (2n + 3) (4n + 5) 8n3 + 30n2 + 37n + 15
=
3 3
Therefore P(n + 1) holds. Thus, by the principle of mathematical induction, for all
n 1, P(n) holds
Exercise 18. Show that
n! > 3n ;
for n 7
For any n 7, let P(n) be the statement that
n! > 3n
1. Base Case: When n = 7 the left hand side of the equation is
7 6 5 4 3 2 1 = 5040;
and the right hand side is
37 = 2187
So P(1) is correct.
Exercise 19. 1. Induction Hypothesis: Assume that the statement P(n) is true for
any positive integer n for some n 1.
P(n) : 8n 7 : n! > 3n is true
2. Inductive Step: Show that the statement P(n) is true for n + 1:i.e
(n + 1)! > 3n+1
One has
(n + 1)! = (n + 1) n!
> (n + 1) 3n (7 + 1) 3n 8 3n > 3 3n = 3n+1
Therefore P(n + 1) holds
8.2 Proof by contradiction
In logic, proof by contradiction is a form of proof that establishes the truth or the validity of
a proposition by showing that assuming the proposition to be false leads to a contradiction.
Although it is quite freely used in mathematical proofs, not every school of mathematical
thought accepts this kind of nonconstructive proof as universally valid
Exercise 20. For every real number x 2 [0; ], we have sin x + cos x 1
2
Suppose for the sake of contradiction that this is not true. Then there exists an x 2 [0; ],
2
we have
sin x + cos x < 1:
Since x 2 [0; ], neither sin x nor cos x is negative, so
2
0 sin x + cos x < 1:
Thus
02 (sin x + cos x)2 < 12 ;
which gives
02 sin2 x + 2 sin x cos x + cos2 x < 12 :
As
sin2 x + cos2 x = 1;
this becomes
0 1 + 2 sin x cos x < 1;
so
1 + 2 sin x cos x < 1:
Subtracting 1 from both sides gives
But this contradicts the fact that neither sin x nor cos x is negative
Suppose this proposition is false. This conditional statement being false means there exist
numbers a and b for which a; b 2 Z is true but
a2 4b 6= 2:
a2 4b = 2
From this equation we get
a2 = 4b + 2 = 2(2b + 1);
so a2 is even. Since a2 is even, it follows that a is even, so
a = 2c